Feed Material
Density
Feed Rate (dry solids)
Moisture
Deck 1
Desired Separation
Wet or Dry
Desired Efficiency
Deck 2
Desired Separation
Wet or Dry
Desired Efficiency
Deck 3
Desired Separation
Wet or Dry
Desired Efficiency
Size
(inches)
4.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
0.50
0.25
0.00
%
Retained
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
20.0%
15.0%
10.0%
10.0%
Vibrating Screen Design & Analysis is provided "as is" without warranty of any
kind, and is for the use of knowledgeable professionals, capable of evaluating the
accuracy of the results. The author is not responsible for the use to which these
results are put.
inches
(W/D)
%
inches
(W/D)
%
inches
(W/D)
%
% Cum
Pass
90.0%
75.0%
55.0%
35.0%
20.0%
10.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
% Cum
Retained
10.0%
25.0%
45.0%
65.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
Process Data
Material Factor
112.5 Number of Decks
150.0
5.0
Screening Conditions
Deck 4
3.00
Desired Separation
W
Wet or Dry
90%
Desired Efficiency
Deck 5
2.00
Desired Separation
W
Wet or Dry
90%
Desired Efficiency
Deck 6
1.00
Desired Separation
W
Wet or Dry
90%
Desired Efficiency
Feed Size Distribution
1.00
5
inches
(W/D)
%
0.50
W
90%
inches
(W/D)
%
0.38
W
90%
inches
(W/D)
%
0.50
W
90%
Size Distribution
100.0%
% We ight
Location
Number Required
Screen Type
Units
80.0%
% Retained
60.0%
% Cum
Pass
% Cum
Retained
40.0%
Notes
20.0%
0.0%
0.00
(inche
s)
1.00 Size
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
My Plant
one
Horizontal vibrating
Vibrating Screen Design & Analysis is provided "as is" without warranty of any
kind, and is for the use of knowledgeable professionals, capable of evaluating the
accuracy of the results. The author is not responsible for the use to which these
results are put.
DECK 1
US
Feed Material
Density
Feed Rate (dry solids)
Moisture
Process Data
Material Factor
Number of Decks
112.5
150.0
5.0
Screening Conditions
Base Capacity
O'size
inches
3.00
O'size Fact0r
(W/D)
W
Halfsize
%
90%
Halsize Factor
t/hr/ft^2
5.05 Deck Factor
Density Factor
t/hr
28.50 Wet Factoror
% wt
19.0% Open areaFactor
t/hr
121.50 Screen Efficiency Factor
% wt
81.0% Screen Surface Factor
Deck 1
Desired Separation
Wet or Dry
Desired Efficiency
Deck Capacity
Over Size
Undersize
1.0
5
t/hr/ft^2
%
%
6.52
25.0%
0.9910
35.0%
0.8943
1.0000
1.1250
1.0000
1.0371
1.25
1.0000
% Cum
Pass
90.0%
75.0%
55.0%
35.0%
20.0%
10.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
% Cum
Retained
10.0%
25.0%
45.0%
65.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
Size Distribution
100.0%
% We ight
Size
(inches)
4.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
0.50
0.25
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Notes
80.0%
60.0%
40.0%
% Retained
% Cum
Pass
% Cum
Retained
20.0%
0.0%
Size
(inches)
0.00 0.50 1.00
1.50
2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00
My Plant
one
Horizontal vibrating
Vibrating Screen Design & Analysis is provided "as is" without warranty of any
kind, and is for the use of knowledgeable professionals, capable of evaluating the
accuracy of the results. The author is not responsible for the use to which these
results are put.
DECK 2
US
Feed Material
Density
Feed Rate (dry solids)
Moisture
Process Data
Material Factor
Number of Decks
112.5
121.5
5.0
Screening Conditions
Base Capacity
O'size
inches
2.00
O'size Fact0r
(W/D)
W
Halfsize
%
90%
Halsize Factor
t/hr/ft^2
6.08 Deck Factor
Density Factor
t/hr
30.38 Wet Factoror
% wt
25.0% Open areaFactor
t/hr
91.13 Screen Efficiency Factor
% wt
75.0% Screen Surface Factor
Deck 2
Desired Separation
Wet or Dry
Desired Efficiency
Deck Capacity
Over Size
Undersize
1.0
5
t/hr/ft^2
%
%
5.41
38.9%
0.8921
38.9%
0.9555
1.0000
1.1250
1.0000
0.7426
1.25
1.0000
% Cum
Pass
100.0%
83.3%
61.1%
38.9%
22.2%
11.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
% Cum
Retained
0.0%
16.7%
38.9%
61.1%
77.8%
88.9%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
Size Distribution
100.0%
% We ight
Size
(inches)
4.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
0.50
0.25
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Notes
80.0%
60.0%
40.0%
% Retained
% Cum
Pass
% Cum
Retained
20.0%
0.0%
Size
(inche
s) 3.00 3.50 4.00
0.00 0.50 1.00
1.50
2.00 2.50
My Plant
one
Horizontal vibrating
Vibrating Screen Design & Analysis is provided "as is" without warranty of any
kind, and is for the use of knowledgeable professionals, capable of evaluating the
accuracy of the results. The author is not responsible for the use to which these
results are put.
DECK 3
US
Feed Material
Density
Feed Rate (dry solids)
Moisture
Process Data
Material Factor
Number of Decks
112.5
91.1
5.0
Screening Conditions
Base Capacity
O'size
inches
1.00
O'size Fact0r
(W/D)
W
Halfsize
%
90%
Halsize Factor
t/hr/ft^2
6.76 Deck Factor
Density Factor
t/hr
30.98 Wet Factoror
% wt
34.0% Open areaFactor
t/hr
60.14 Screen Efficiency Factor
% wt
66.0% Screen Surface Factor
Deck 3
Desired Separation
Wet or Dry
Desired Efficiency
Deck Capacity
Over Size
Undersize
1.0
5
t/hr/ft^2
%
%
3.80
53.3%
0.7635
26.7%
0.7826
1.0000
1.1250
1.1000
0.6074
1.25
1.0000
% Cum
Pass
100.0%
100.0%
73.3%
46.7%
26.7%
13.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
% Cum
Retained
0.0%
0.0%
26.7%
53.3%
73.3%
86.7%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
Size Distribution
100.0%
% We ight
Size
(inches)
4.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
0.50
0.25
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Notes
80.0%
60.0%
40.0%
% Retained
% Cum Pass
% Cum
Retained
20.0%
0.0%
Size
(inches)
0.00 0.50 1.00
1.50
2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00
Retained
40.0%
20.0%
0.0%
Size
(inches)
0.00 0.50 1.00
1.50
2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00
My Plant
one
Horizontal vibrating
Vibrating Screen Design & Analysis is provided "as is" without warranty of any
kind, and is for the use of knowledgeable professionals, capable of evaluating the
accuracy of the results. The author is not responsible for the use to which these
results are put.
DECK 4
US
Feed Material
Density
Feed Rate (dry solids)
Moisture
Process Data
Material Factor
Number of Decks
112.5
60.1
5.0
Screening Conditions
Base Capacity
O'size
inches
0.50
O'size Fact0r
(W/D)
W
Halfsize
%
90%
Halsize Factor
t/hr/ft^2
5.34 Deck Factor
Density Factor
t/hr
25.70 Wet Factoror
% wt
42.7% Open areaFactor
t/hr
34.45 Screen Efficiency Factor
% wt
57.3% Screen Surface Factor
Deck 4
Desired Separation
Wet or Dry
Desired Efficiency
Deck Capacity
Over Size
Undersize
1.0
5
t/hr/ft^2
%
%
2.50
63.6%
0.6664
18.2%
0.6703
1.0000
1.1250
1.3000
0.5738
1.25
1.0000
% Cum
Pass
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
63.6%
36.4%
18.2%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
% Cum
Retained
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
36.4%
63.6%
81.8%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
Size Distribution
100.0%
% We ight
Size
(inches)
4.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
0.50
0.25
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Notes
80.0%
60.0%
40.0%
% Retained
% Cum
Pass
% Cum
Retained
20.0%
0.0%
Size
(inches)
0.00 0.50 1.00
1.50
2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00
% Retained
% Cum Pass
60.0%
% Cum
Retained
40.0%
20.0%
0.0%
Size
(inches)
0.00 0.50 1.00
1.50
2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00
My Plant
one
Horizontal vibrating
Vibrating Screen Design & Analysis is provided "as is" without warranty of any
kind, and is for the use of knowledgeable professionals, capable of evaluating the
accuracy of the results. The author is not responsible for the use to which these
results are put.
DECK 5
US
Feed Material
Density
Feed Rate (dry solids)
Moisture
Process Data
Material Factor
Number of Decks
112.5
34.4
5.0
Screening Conditions
Base Capacity
O'size
inches
0.38
O'size Fact0r
(W/D)
W
Halfsize
%
90%
Halsize Factor
t/hr/ft^2
7.02 Deck Factor
Density Factor
t/hr
16.73 Wet Factoror
% wt
48.6% Open areaFactor
t/hr
17.71 Screen Efficiency Factor
% wt
51.4% Screen Surface Factor
Deck 5
Desired Separation
Wet or Dry
Desired Efficiency
Deck Capacity
Over Size
Undersize
1.0
5
t/hr/ft^2
%
%
2.06
71.4%
0.6038
0.0%
0.4412
1.0000
1.1250
1.5000
0.5221
1.25
1.0000
% Cum
Pass
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
57.1%
28.6%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
% Cum
Retained
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
42.9%
71.4%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
Size Distribution
100.0%
% We ight
Size
(inches)
4.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
0.50
0.25
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
80.0%
60.0%
40.0%
% Retained
% Cum
Pass
% Cum
Retained
20.0%
0.0%
Size
(inches)
0.00 0.50 1.00
1.50
2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00
80.0%
% Retained
60.0%
% Cum
Pass
% Cum
Retained
40.0%
Notes
20.0%
0.0%
Size
(inches)
0.00 0.50 1.00
1.50
2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00
My Plant
one
Horizontal vibrating
Vibrating Screen Design & Analysis is provided "as is" without warranty of any
kind, and is for the use of knowledgeable professionals, capable of evaluating the
accuracy of the results. The author is not responsible for the use to which these
results are put.
DECK 6
US
Feed Material
Density
Feed Rate (dry solids)
Moisture
Process Data
Material Factor
Number of Decks
112.5
17.7
5.0
Screening Conditions
Base Capacity
O'size
inches
0.50
O'size Fact0r
(W/D)
W
Halfsize
%
90%
Halsize Factor
t/hr/ft^2
1.40 Deck Factor
Density Factor
t/hr
1.77 Wet Factoror
% wt
10.0% Open areaFactor
t/hr
15.94 Screen Efficiency Factor
% wt
90.0% Screen Surface Factor
Deck 6
Desired Separation
Wet or Dry
Desired Efficiency
Deck Capacity
Over Size
Undersize
1.0
5
t/hr/ft^2
%
%
2.50
0.0%
1.2989
50.0%
1.1824
1.0000
1.1250
1.3000
0.6369
1.25
1.0000
% Cum
Pass
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
% Cum
Retained
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
50.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
Size Distribution
100.0%
% Weight
Size
(inches)
4.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
0.50
0.25
0.00
0.00
0.00
80.0%
60.0%
40.0%
20.0%
% Retained
% Cum Pass
% Cum
Retained
% Weight
100.0%
80.0%
60.0%
0.00
0.00
0.00
0%
0%
0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
40.0%
% Retained
% Cum
Pass
% Cum
Retained
Notes
20.0%
0.0%
Size
0.00 0.50 1.00
1.50(inches)
2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00
Factor "D"
Factor "G"
Open Area of Screen Surface
Factor "G" % Open Area of Surface Used
% Open Area Indicated in Capacity
Factor "J"
Efficiency
Objective Factor "J"
95%
1 0.999996
90%
1.15 1.179118
85%
1.35 1.358239
80%
1.5 1.53736
75%
1.7 1.716481
70%
1.9 1.895603
0.5
2.612088
0.25
3.507694
1
1.25
1.5
1.75
2.25
ied opening when feed to deck contains 25% oversize (Factor "B") and 40% halfsize (Factor "C").
(Adjusts Factor "A" to suit conditions)
aperture. (Adjusts Factor "A" to suit conditions).
op deck separation. Time delay for material to pass top deck and 2nd or 3rd decks leaves less effective area available. This factor is expre
creening deck. Generally, about 5 to 7 GPM of water is used per STPH of solids fed to the screen. The volume of water required should be
f one cubic foot of material weighs 100 lbs. cu.ft. .
enings will pass more material per square foot than square openings.
5
5
4.424779 4.761905
10
7.8125
1
110
ssing Per Sq
7.78
6.96
6.38
6.12
5.86
5.29
4.96
4.59
4.18
3.71
3.45
3.15
2.82
2.45
2.01
1.51
1.22
0.91
0.75
0.58
0.40
5
5
8.333333 7.142857
2.941176 2.777778
Factor "B"
Factor "C"
Percent of Oversize Material in Feed to Deck Percent of Halfsize Material in Feed to Deck
% OversizeFactor "B"
% Halfsize Factor "C"
y = 86.024*n28^6 - 212.58*n28^5 +
5%
1.21
1.07
0%
0.4
0.44
0.44
10%
1.13
1.05
1.05
5%
0.45
0.48
15%
1.08
1.03
10%
0.5
0.55
0.55
20%
1.02
1.01
1.01
15%
0.55
0.62
25%
1
0.99
20%
0.6
0.7
0.70
30%
0.96
0.98
0.98
25%
0.7
0.76
35%
0.92
0.96
30%
0.8
0.8
0.83
40%
0.88
0.95
0.95
35%
0.9
0.89
45%
0.84
0.93
40%
1
1
0.97
50%
0.79
0.9
0.91
45%
1.1
1.07
55%
0.75
0.88
50%
1.2
1.2
1.18
60%
0.7
0.86
0.86
55%
1.3
1.31
65%
0.66
0.83
60%
1.4
1.4
1.45
70%
0.62
0.8
0.80
65%
1.55
1.60
75%
0.58
0.76
70%
1.7
1.8
1.77
80%
0.53
0.7
0.71
75%
1.85
1.95
85%
0.5
0.64
0.64
80%
2
2.2
2.19
90%
0.46
0.55
0.54
85%
2.2
2.5
2.51
95%
0.33
0.4
0.40
90%
2.4
3
3.00
95%
3.75
3.74
Factor "E"
Factor "F"
Factor "H"
Wet Screening
Opening Factor "E"
0.03125
1
0.0625
1.25
0.125
2
0.1875
2.5
0.25
2
0.375
1.75
0.5
1.4
0.75
1.3
1
1.25
1.5
2
ed in Capacity
1
1.25
1.5 y = -5x + 5.75
1.75
2
2.25
3.25
4.5
1.25
3
3.5
3.5
3
2.5
1.75
1.35
1.25
1.1
1
1.1
2
2.5
2.5
2
1.5
1.3
1.2
1.1
1
1
Material Weight
Lbs./cu. ft. Factor "F"
150
1.5
125
1.25
100
1
90
0.9
80
0.8
75
0.75
70
0.7
60
0.6
50
0.5
40
0.4
30
0.3
lable. This factor is expressed as a percentage of the top deck effective area.
water required should be supplied so that a portion is combined with the solids into a feed box to prepare a slurry feed to the screen. The ba
0.45
0.84
eed to the screen. The balance of water is added through a series of spray bars located over the screening deck.