Abstract
Agricultural wastes from maize culture fields were prepared and activated yielding the natural absorbents designated as SOMAP, SOMAP1,
SOMAP2, HELAP, HELAP1, SAGAP, and SAGAP1. The samples were further characterized using microscopy, FTIR spectroscopy, titration,
and adsorption from solution. The dry and wet methods of analysis confirmed the presence of functional groups (hydroxyl, carboxylic,
phenolic, and lactonic) in the bulk and on the surface, respectively. Each prepared solid sample was tested for adsorption ability using aqueous
dye solutions of basic blue 41 (BB41), acid blue 74 (AB74), and reactive black 5 (RB5). The adsorption affinity decreased according to
BB41 > AB74 > RB5. For BB41 the relative adsorbent saturation followed the series: SOMAP2 < SOMAP1 < SOMAP, HELAP < HELAP1
and SAGAP < SAGAP1. Adsorption equilibrium concentrations were followed by HPLC with diode array detection. The equilibrium data
fitted well with both Langmuir and Freundlich models of adsorption. The values of the Freundlich exponent 1/n correlated with the variance
of the group distribution curves. The monolayer capacity of all studied adsorbents using the basic dye BB41 correlated acceptably with the
corresponding amount of total acid groups on the adsorbent surface.
2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Natural adsorbents; Surface chemistry; Adsorption; Dyes
1. Introduction
Investigations have evaluated inexpensive alternative materials [1,2] as potential adsorbents for pollutants and
coloured compounds. The options considered in dye removal
using adsorption [3,4] included inorganic synthetics [5] and
natural materials [2], however, the use of natural organic
solids has grown exponentially. Among organic compounds,
many materials fill the potentiality demand for dye removal,
without being economical. Naturally occurring materials and
wastes [611] improve the collection of low cost adsorbents,
while being environmental acceptable. A number of articles
have been published on the use of maize cobs [12], palm-fruit
bunch particles [1315], eucalyptus bark [16], cotton [17],
Corresponding author. Tel.: +52 222 229 5500; fax: +52 222 229 5525.
E-mail address: melizald@siu.buap.mx (M.P. Elizalde-Gonzalez).
0927-7757/$ see front matter 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.colsurfa.2004.11.022
108
M.M. Davila-Jimenez et al. / Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 254 (2005) 107114
2. Experimental
2.1. Materials
The adsorbent materials (see Table 1) were prepared from
agricultural waste of maize collected in Puebla (Mexico), by
washing (SOMAP, HELAP and SAGAP) or by washing and
activation (SOMAP1, SOMAP2, HELAP1 and SAGAP1)
[26,27]. Activators A and B consisted of a chlorinated and
oxygenated agent, respectively [27]. The following dyes were
chosen because of their extended regional use in the textile industry: basic blue 41 (BB41), acid blue 74 (AB74),
and reactive black 5 (RB5). Their formulae are presented in
Table 2. They were used as received and the relative content
in the samples determined by HPLC at 220 nm was 7095%.
Other components could correspond to salts, fillers, dyestuff
Table 1
Prepared adsorbents, their raw material, activation and magnitude of the
relative specific surface determined by adsorption isotherms of methylene
blue from aqueous solutions
Raw material
Activation
procedure
OM
none
B
HEL
none
SOMAP
42
SOMAP1
40
SOMAP2
90
HELAP
60
HELAP1
50
HELAP1a
none
Ssp (m2 g1 )
SAG
Adsorbent
SAGAP
50
SAGAP1
30
intermediates or compounds, which served as start materials in the dye synthesis. BB41 (C21 H27 O3 N4 SCl) was a
Clariant product (no. 11154) and it is a basic dye of the azo
type. AB74 (C16 H8 O8 N2 Na2 S2 ) was purchased from Hartman Leddon Co. (product no. 242) and is an indigoid acid
dye. RB5 (C26 H21 O19 N5 Na4 S6 ) is produced by Ciba as reactive dye of the azo-sulphonated type. Dyes solutions were
prepared without pH adjustment in the concentration range
from 0.5 to 3 mM in deionised water obtained from a Milli-Q
reagent grade water system. Deionised water was also used
in the chromatographic analysis together with methanol and
acetonitrile HPLC grade (Burdick and Jackson). Methylene
blue used as probe molecule in the determination of the specific surface was a Sigma product. Phosphate buffer and the
reagents used in the Boehms titration were prepared using
reagent grade salts from J.T. Baker. The carbon samples used
for comparison of the surface functional groups were Carbon
Vulcan XC72 GP-3037 and Bone black from Sigma.
2.2. Methods
A Beckman DU 7500 spectrophotometer was used to determine the maximum absorption wavelength of the dyes and
a Nicolet Magna FT-IR-750 spectroscopy apparatus was employed to determine the presence of functional groups at
room temperature. The pellets were prepared by using the
same dilution of every sample in KBr. Optical photographs
were taken with a LEICA MZ 125 stereomicroscope by region mapping (n = 6) of the sample. Quantification of the
functional groups was performed according to the Boehms
titration methodology [28] for activated carbons by using analytical grade reagents.
Adsorption isotherms were measured at a room temperature (25 C). A definite amount of adsorbent was introduced
into polycarbonate cylindrical cells with a lid, and placed in
contact with a measured volume of the aqueous dye solutions
of a known concentration in the range 0.53.0 mM. The mass
to volume relation was 1:50. After stirring for 1 h, the dye solution that resulted from the adsorption equilibrium was separated from the exhausted adsorbent after 24 h and analyzed
by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The
chromatographic system consisted of a Model Constametric
I pump (LDC/Milton Roy), a Model 7125 syringe loading
sample injector (Rheodyne) with a 20 l loop and a Model
994 programmable photodiode array detector (Waters) operated at max for each dye. The chromatographic analysis [29]
was performed on Beckman and Dionex columns: Ultrapore
Octyl (7.5 cm 4.6 mm i.d.) for the BB41 dye solution, OmniPac PCX500 (25 cm 4 mm i.d.) for AB74 and Ultrasphere
Octyl (15 cm 4.6 mm i.d.) for the RB5 dye. The equilibrium
concentrations of adsorption were determined by interpolating in the following calibration curves: CBB41 = Ap /989,949
(R2 = 0.9976) at 615 nm, CAB74 = Ap /516,203 (R2 = 0.9996)
at 609 nm and CRB5 = Ap /857,428 (R2 = 0.9783) at 600 nm,
where C is the concentration of the corresponding dye solution, Ap is the area of the chromatographic peak and R2 is
M.M. Davila-Jimenez et al. / Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 254 (2005) 107114
109
Table 2
Studied dyes, their formulae, codes used in this work and calculated molecular areas
110
M.M. Davila-Jimenez et al. / Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 254 (2005) 107114
Fig. 2. Optical photographs obtained by stereomicroscopy of the adsorbents HELAP (A), HELAP1 (B), SAGAP (C) and SAGAP1 (D).
760500 cm1 , similar as that presented in the sodium phosphate salt of cellulose. Spectroscopy is usually considered a
tool just confirming the structure of synthetic adsorbents, but
also verifying the presence of functional groups introduced
by modification as for example the crosslinking of starch [32].
However, it has not been applied in any of the studies we reviewed describing the application of wastes in the adsorption
of dyes. The exception is represented by bagasse fly ash [11],
for which the presence of calcium silicate was demonstrated
by IR spectroscopy.
Although no marked differences could be observed in the
FTIR spectra of the bulk samples, a variation in the surface
chemistry could be expected after activation, as it was viewed
Fig. 3. FT-IR spectra of the adsorbents SOMAP (1), SOMAP1 (2), SOMAP2
(3), HELAP (4), HELAP1 (5), SAGAP (6) and SAGAP1 (7).
M.M. Davila-Jimenez et al. / Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 254 (2005) 107114
111
Table 3
Functional groups on the surface of the studied adsorbents quantified by Boehms titration in millimoles per gram of adsorbent and in percentage (in parentheses)
Adsorbent
SOMAP
SOMAP1
SOMAP2
HELAP
HELAP1
SAGAP
SAGAP1
Carbon
Bone black
0.15 (8.2)
0.05 (2.6)
0.12 (12.8)
0 (0)
0.10 (5.6)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0.10
1.40
Carboxylic
Lactonic
Phenolic
Total
mmol g1
mol m2
0.40 (22.0)
0.05 (2.6)
0.10 (10.6)
0.37 20.9)
0.25 (14.1)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0.05
0.25
0.07(3.8)
0.50 (26.3)
0.05 (5.3)
0.33 (18.6)
0.32 (18.1)
0.30 (23.1)
0.40 (36.4)
0.05
0.05
1.20(65.9)
1.30 (68.4)
0.67 (71.3)
1.07 (60.4)
1.10 (62.1)
1.00 (76.9)
0.70 (63.6)
0.40
0.20
1.67
1.85
0.82
1.77
1.67
1.30
1.10
0.50
0.50
1.82
1.90
0.94
1.77
1.77
1.30
1.10
0.60
1.90
43.3
47.5
10.4
29.5
35.4
20.0
36.7
in the morphology (Figs. 1 and 2). All the samples maintained their functional groups in the bulk after activation with
the exception of SOMAP2 (Fig. 3, line 3), where the band
at 760500 cm1 disappeared. The results of the Boehms
titration gathered in Table 3 confirmed the absence of carboxylic groups on the surface of the adsorbents SAGAP and
SAGAP1, as it was found by FTIR spectroscopy. As shown
from the titration with base, all samples were predominantly
acidic. Moreover, the sample SAGAP indicated absence of
basic groups before and after activation, and lack of carboxylic groups. Among the oxygen-containing groups, the
phenolic acidic functionality was the most abundant in all
samples and made the main contribution to the acidic surface groups. The density of the total acidic groups was similar in the pairs SOMAPSOMAP1, HELAPHELAP1 and
SAGAPSAGAP1, which represented samples before activation and after activation with B. The contrary case was
observed with the pair SOMAPSOMAP2, where the activation A produced a decrease of 50% of the acidic groups. For
comparison, titration of two carbon samples with opposite
basic character and identical total acidic groups was accomplished. The total amount of surface groups (1.90 mmol g1 )
of the bone black sample (Table 3) used commonly for decolourisation was similar to that of the natural adsorbents
SOMAP, SOMAP1 and HELAP studied in this work. Interestingly, their total amount of groups was less than that
present in wood and mineral carbon reported in [28] to test
the Boehm titration. From the penultimate column in Table 3,
it did not turn out to be clear the effect of activation on the
total amount of surface groups, since after activation the specific area changed (see Table 1). The specific density of total
functional groups in mol m2 calculated in the last column
showed that activation B increased the total number of surface
groups, while activation A produced a different result.
Fig. 4. Adsorption isotherms of the basic dye BB41 (A), the acid dye AB74
(B) and the reactive dye RB5 (C) by the adsorbents SOMAP ( ), SOMAP1
(), SOMAP2 (), HELAP (), HELAP1 (), SAGAP () and SAGAP1
().
112
M.M. Davila-Jimenez et al. / Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 254 (2005) 107114
Table 4
Adsorption parameter values of the calculated monolayer capacity am (mol m2 ) in the Langmuir adsorption isotherm equation (a = (am kL C)/(1 + kL C)),
of the heterogenity degree 1/n in the Freundlich equation (a = kF C1/n ) and of the coverage degree = amax /am
Adsorbent
Basic blue 41
am
1/n
SOMAP
S0MAP1
SOMAP2
HELAP
HELAP1
SAGAP
SAGAP1
3.3
3.0
2.7
2.3
2.6
2.0
3.0
0.48
0.35
0.69
0.48
0.38
0.89
0.37
0.82
0.91
0.55
0.85
0.92
0.79
0.83
Acid blue 74
am
1/n
1.4
0.1
0.2
0.6
0.7
0.22
1.06
0.47
0.50
0.22
1.24
0.37
0.97
0.81
0.75
0.86
0.81
Reactive black 5
am
1/n
0.5
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.30
0.83
1.04
0.29
0.31
0.47
0.37
0.94
0.78
0.51
0.94
0.91
0.69
0.87
M.M. Davila-Jimenez et al. / Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 254 (2005) 107114
113
Fig. 6. Model depicting the interaction between dye molecules and a cellulosic surface, according to the charge in the adsorbate molecules and the surface
functional groups on the adsorbent.
potential of a molecule is enhanced by increasing molecular size and for example, aromaticity in the case of carbon.
In the case of dyes and carbon, only small molecules penetrate into micropores, whose content reduces dramatically
after thermal regeneration. The molecular area of the dyes
studied here, increases AB74 < BB41 < RB5 as it is shown
in Table 2 and did not correspond with their adsorbability
on the studied adsorbents (see Fig. 4). Hence, on natural adsorbents as SOMAP1, HELAP and SAGAP the intermolecular interactions between the functional groups of each dyes
and the surface chemistry of the adsorbents may play an
important role. To test this hypothesis, we chose precisely
adsorbates carrying diverse groups and exhibiting different
character: the cationic organic base BB41 used for acrylic
fibers, the organic acid AB74 that associates with nitrogenous basic groups in wool and the reactive molecule RB5
that bonds with the fibers by addition method. The values
presented in Table 3 demonstrated that acidic groups prevailed over basic groups on the surface of the studied adsorbents. This explained the higher adsorption values of the
basic dye BB41 in comparison with the acid dye AB74, due to
the electrostatic interactions depicted schematically in Fig. 6.
Furthermore, the calculated monolayer capacity of all studied adsorbents upon the basic dye BB41 correlated acceptably (R2 = 0.8599) with the corresponding amount of total
acid groups nH as it can be seen in Fig. 5C. Examining the
positive charge on the basic dye molecule interacting with
the negatively charged surface, it was not surprising why for
example HELAP (without basic groups) adsorbed the basic
BB41. Looking at the concentration of basic and acid groups
in the SOMAP adsorbent series in Table 3, it will be useful to
examine the adsorption isotherms of the acid dye (Fig. 4B),
where SOMAP (nOH = 3.6 mol m2 ) occupied the upper
position, SOMAP1 (nOH = 1.2 mol m2 ) the intermediate
and SOMAP2 (nOH = 1.3 mol m2 ) the lowest. This corresponded approximately to the surface amount of basic groups
(nOH , in mol per square meter). SOMAP1 and SOMAP2
presented similar amount of basic groups and very different surface concentration of acid groups. This fact can explain probably the form of the SOMAP1 adsorption isotherm,
which at low concentrations suggested low affinity as a result of the repulsion produced by the high amount of acid
groups (46.2 mol m2 ) in comparison with 9.1 mol m2
in SOMAP2. The attraction of cationic dye bases by anionic
cellulosic structures has already been mentioned [15], but
not demonstrated quantitatively. Qualitative mechanisms for
the adsorption interaction of acid dyes have been presented
for modified silica [5] and cotton [17]. In spite of the cellulosic character of the studied adsorbents, the low adsorption
of the reactive dye RB5 used in dyeing of cellulosic fibers
could be due to the absence of mediators and conditions favoring the reaction between the dye and the specific sites
on the adsorbent surface. Judging in general from the adsorption magnitudes depicted in the adsorption isotherms in
Fig. 4 and the calculated monolayer values listed in Table 4,
the high adsorption capacity of the studied solids under the
given conditions cannot be declared. However, a visible and
considerable decolourisation of the dye solution at the given
concentration was observed. Comparable adsorption (98%)
of the RB5 dye could be achieved on SOMAP2 and carbon from 400 mg l1 solutions [26] by using a 1:10 mass to
volume relation, while SOMAP1s efficiency reached 60%
upon RB5 and 98% upon BB41. As known, and precisely
demonstrated for the adsorption of RB5 on different natural
adsorbents [7,10,16]; dye and adsorbent concentration have
the most significant influence on the adsorption magnitude.
Concluding this section, we can say that the present part
of this study served to demonstrate qualitatively and semiquantitatively the role of the physicochemical interactions
between dyes and adsorbents. By considering the coverage
degree reached in each system (see Table 4) a model depicting quantitatively the surfacedye interaction could be
proposed. However, any model, which does not take into account the orientation and aggregation of the dye molecules
114
M.M. Davila-Jimenez et al. / Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 254 (2005) 107114
4. Conclusions
The present study showed that natural adsorbents prepared
from maize waste might be characterized. According to the
composition, texture, and surface chemistry, the adsorption
potential of a natural maize waste product can be evaluated.
Our results demonstrated the important role of the surface
chemistry, contrary to the leading function of the magnitude
of the specific surface. The characterization of non-expensive
solids prepared and adapted from natural agricultural wastes
will help customize dyeadsorbent interactions and therefore, optimize adsorption efficiency for environmental applications.
Acknowledgement
AAPC thanks CONACyT for a scholarship grant
(130497).
References
[1] M.M. Nassar, M.S. El-Geundi, J. Chem. Tech. Biotechnol. 50 (1991)
257.
[2] K.R. Ramakrishna, T. Viraraghavan, Water Sci. Technol. 36 (1997)
189.
[3] O.J. Hao, H. Kim, P.-Ch. Chiang, Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol.
30 (2000) 449.
[4] T. Robinson, G. McMullan, R. Marchant, P. Nigam, Bioresour. Technol. 77 (2001) 247.
[5] A. Krysztafkiewicz, S. Binkowski, T. Jesionowski, Appl. Surf. Sci.
199 (2002) 31.
[6] R.M. Liversidge, G.J. Lloyd, D.A.J. Wase, C.F. Forster, Process
Biochem. 32 (1997) 473.
[7] T. Robinson, B. Chandran, P. Nigam, Environ. Int. 28 (2002)
29.
[8] G. Annadurai, R.-Sh. Juang, D.-J. Lee, J. Hazard. Mater. B92 (2002)
263.
[9] R. Sivaraj, C. Namasivayam, K. Kadirvelu, Waste Manage. 21 (2001)
105.
[10] T. Robinson, B. Chandran, P. Nigam, Water Res. 36 (2002) 2824.
[11] V.K. Gupta, D. Mohan, S. Sharma, M. Sharma, Sep. Sci. Technol.
35 (2000) 2097.
[12] M.S. El-Geundi, Water Res. 25 (1991) 271.
[13] M.M. Nassar, M.F. Hamoda, G.H. Radwan, Water Sci. Technol. 32
(1995) 27.
[14] M.M. Nassar, Y.H. Magdy, Chem. Eng. J. 66 (1997) 223.
[15] M.M. Nassar, Water Sci. Technol. 40 (1999) 133.
[16] L.C. Morais, O.M. Freitas, E.P. Goncalves, L.T. Vasconcelos, C.G.
Gonzalez Beca, Water Res. 33 (1999) 979.
[17] I. Bouzaida, M.B. Rammah, Mater. Sci. Eng. C21 (2002) 151.
[18] G. Sun, X. Xu, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 36 (1997) 808.
[19] W.T. Tsai, C.Y. Chang, S.L. Lee, Carbon 35 (1997) 1198.
[20] W.T. Tsai, C.Y. Chang, S.L. Lee, Bioresour. Technol. 64 (1998)
211.
[21] F.C. Wu, R.L. Tseng, R.S. Juang, Environ. Technol. 22 (2001)
205.
[22] C. Namasivayam, D. Kavitha, Dyes Pigments 54 (2002) 47.
[23] C. Namasivayam, M.D. Kumar, K. Selvi, R.A. Begum, T. Vanathi,
R.T. Yamuna, Biomass Bioenerg. 21 (2001) 477.
[24] P.K. Malik, Dyes Pigments 56 (2003) 239.
[25] F.Ch. Wu, R.-L. Tseng, R.-Sh. Juang, J. Hazard. Mater. 69 (1999)
287.
[26] M.P. Elizalde-Gonzalez, A.A. Pelaez-Cid, Environ. Technol. 24
(2003) 821.
[27] M.M. Davila, M.P. Elizalde, A.A. Pelaez, Patent in preparation.
[28] I.I. Salame, T.J. Bandosz, J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 240 (2001) 252.
[29] M.M. Davila-Jimenez, M.P. Elizalde, A. Gonzalez, A.A. GutierrezGonzalez, Pelaez-Cid, J. Chromatogr. A 889 (2000) 253.
[30] N.V. Keltsev, Teoreticheskie Osnovy Adsorbtsionnoi Tekhniki,
Khimiya, Moscow, 1976.
[31] A.A. Pelaez-Cid, M.Sc. thesis, UAP, Mexico, 2001.
[32] F. Delval, G. Crini, N. Morin, J. Vebrel, S. Bertini, G. Torri, Dyes
Pigments 53 (2002) 79.