STUDY OF QUALITY OF
WORK LIFE
AT
ABSTRACT
Quality of work life denotes all the organizational inputs which aim at the employees
satisfaction and enhancing organizational effectiveness. The basic purpose is to develop jobs and
working conditions that are excellent for employees as well as economic health of organization.
It refers to the level of satisfaction, motivation, commitment and involvement an individual
experience with respect to their line at the work.
Trichy Customs and Central Excise Collectorate came into existence with effect from June 01,
1983 with the jurisdiction formed out of erstwhile Madurai and Madras Collectorate.The Central
Excise & Customs Commissionerate is responsible for collection of Union Excise duties on the
manufactured goods and Customs duties on goods imported into the country. These duties form
the biggest source of tax revenue for the Central Government and the Central Excise duties form
the single largest source of Government revenue. The Department of Central Excise and
Customs comes under the Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance. The apex body of the
Department is the Central Board of Excise and Customs (CBEC), which comprises of six
members and is headed by the Chairman. Administratively, the entire country is divided into
Commissionerate of Central Excise and Customs.
This study helps to find the quality of work life in the Office of Commissionerate of Central
Excise and Service Tax. The objective of the study is to determine the various factors influencing
the quality of work life, to measure the level of satisfaction towards the quality of work life and
suggestions to improve the quality of work life.
The type of research adopted in this study is Descriptive Research. Convenience
sampTirucchirappalli Central Excisemethod is used to collect data, the sample size is 70.
Questionnaire was used to collect the primary data.
The findings revealed that the organization is providing good working conditions and the overall
job satisfaction was found to be good and overall quality of work life is good. The organization
can improve infrastructure facilities so as to improve the performance of employees. This study
highlighted only some of the small gaps in employees satisfaction towards the quality of work
life.
Nagapattinam and ICDs at Karur, Pondicherry and Arakkonam and a few bonded
warehouses. There is a Customs Airport at Trichy.
Subsequent re-organisations took place with effect from May 01, 1987 and June 01, 1991, as a
consequence of which Trichy Central Excise Collectorate had 3 Divisions in its fold namely :-
Trichy Central Excise Division was further bifurcated into two Divisions namely Trichy I Central
Excise Division and Trichy II Central Excise Division w.e.f August 01, 1997. With effect from
October 01, 1997, a new Division namely Cuddalore Central Excise Division was carved out of
the
jurisdiction
of
Pondicherry
Division.
Further with effect from 01-11-2002, a new Commissionerate namely Pondicherry was formed
and Cuddalore Division was attached to Pondicherry Commissionerate. Tanjore Division was
bifurcated as Tanjore Division and Karaikal Division. Trichy II Division was bifurcated into two
Divisions namely Trichy II Division and Karur Division.
At present the following are the Divisions of Trichy Central Excise Commissionerate with
jurisdiction as mentioned below :
TIRUCCHIRAPPALLI - I DIVISION
TIRUCCHIRAPPALLI - II DIVISION
KARUR DIVISION
THANJAVUR DIVISION
KARAIKAL DIVISION
Year
SBE Target
2007-08
325
225.98
2008-09
250
201.60
2009-10
295
362.75
2010-11
450
477.28
2011-12
600
741.44
2012-13
950
639.43
2013-14
660
664.82
(Net Revenue)
CPU, Aranthangi.
CPU, Manamelgudi.
CPU, Salem.
CPU, Coimbatore.
ICD, Karur.
Customs Division, Cuddalore.
Divisional Preventive,
Cuddalore.
CSBU, Cuddalore.
CPU, Mahabalipuram.
CPU, Tirumullaivasal.
ICD, Arakkonam.
ICD, Pulichapallam.
CFS, Karasur.
CFS, Ambur
CSBU, Nagapattinam.
CPU, Karaikal.
CPU, Thopputhurai.
CPU, Muthupet.
Karaikal Port.
Custom House,
Nagapattinam.
CPU, Point Calimere.
CPU, Mandapam.
CPU, Thondi.
CPU, Keelakkarai.
CSBU, Rameswaram.
CPU, Tiruchendur.
CSBU, Kulasekarapattinam.
CPU, Kanyakumari.
CPU, Nagercoil.
CPU, Madurai.
STAFF WELFARE
CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE STAFF QUARTERS AT KARUMANDAPAM,
TRICHY
1. Trichy Central Excise Commisionerate was inaugurated on 01.06.1983. The Staff Associations
had been urging for the construction of the residential accomodation. As one of the staff welfare
measures, this Commissionerate purchased land measuring 4.18 acres on 31.10.1994 at Sakthi
Nagar, Karumandapam,Trichy for Rs.63 Lakhs(approx.) for construction of staff quarters.
2. The area is situated 4 Kms. away from the Commissionerate Headquarters Office and lies on
the Trichy-Dindigul road at Karumandapam, Trichy. The said area is a fast developing one in the
City. The staff quarters were constructed by CPWD at a cost of Rs.6.14 Crores(approx.) and
were alloted to the staff members from 01.06.2000 onwards. Presently about 500 staff and their
family members are residing in these 120 quarters of the following types: TYPE - I : 20, TYPE
II :42, TYPE III :54,TYPE IV :4
3. For the development of site and services , the provision viz. Street lights in and around the
complex, Pump House, Sewage Plant, Internal roads and path, filtered water distribution lines,
unfiltered water supply distribution lines, storm water drain and Horticulture operations have
been made.
4. As a staff welfare measure, this office has alloted a flat in Type-III to M/s.KendriyaBhandar,
Trichy for running General Stores. A sentry room has been constructed and round-the-clock
Security System is provided for the safety of the building as well as property of the residents. A
Service Association has also been formed to look after the welfare of the residents. Efforts to
improve the services and facilities are still being continued. It is also proposed to provide a
children's park-cum-playground by installing safe, non-toxic and modern play equipments for
children's recreation and exercise at a cost of about Rs.2 Lakhs from the Customs Welfare Fund.
Taxes namely Customs, Central Excise and Service Tax. The CBEC also exercises overall
supervision over Customs, Central Excise and Service Tax field formations located all over the
country. The Board discharges various tasks assigned to it, with the help of various Directorates
headed by officers of the rank of Director General (AddlSecy rank) and Director (JtSecy rank)
At the field level there are 34 zones headed by Chief Commissioners of Central Excise and
Customs, who are exercising supervision over the various Commissioners under their charge.
There are 93 Central Excise Commissionerates in the country headed by Commissioners of
Central Excise. These Commissionerates are entrusted with the task of collection of duties in
notified territorial jurisdiction of the Commissionerate and related Administrative functions.
Most of the Commissionerates also deal with work relating to Service Tax & Customs in their
jurisdiction.
Commissionerates:
Immediately below the CBEC are the chief commissioners.The chief of commissioners are
administratively incharge of several commissionarates ranging from 2 to 4,each of which is
headed by a commissioner..The commissione rate, as its name implies,is the main organizational
mechanism for the collection of excise duties. The organisation structure for commissionerate is
as follows:
i.
ii.
iii.
iv.
v.
vi.
vii.
viii.
Commissioner
Commissioner (Appeals)
Additional Commissioner
Joint Commissioners
Deputy Commissioner
Assistant Commissioner (incharge of division)
Superintendent (incharge of range)
Sector officers (Sectors) like inspectors etc.
Taxes
Direct Taxes
I) Income Tax, Wealth Tax
Indirect Taxes
I)
Easier to collect
Inflationary
Customs excise & service tax appellate tribunal (CESTAT ) procedure rules 1982
Power to impose Excise Duty on liquor, opium & narcotics to State. Govt.
Any article can be levied C.E. duty if all following conditions are satisfied :
a)
b)
c)
d)
Goods manufactured in SEZ are excluded excisable gods& no E.D. is livable on such
goods
Once duty liability is fixed, it can be collected from a person at time & place found
administratively most convenient for collection
When goods are stored in a warehouse without payment of duty the liability to pay duty
is on person who stores goods i.e. warehouse keeper.
Goods manufactured or produced in SEZ are excisable goods but no duty is leviable
H.Q. New Delhi. Consists of 6 to 7 members. Board appoints officers & exercise
following powers: To issue instructions & direction to C.E. officers, to ensure uniformity in
classification of goods and to ensure uniformity in levy of E.D.
B) Chief Commissioner of Central Excise
Country is divided into 34 zones. Each zone is under supervision & control of chief
commissioners & commissioners (Appeals) within his zone.
C) Commissioner of Central Excise:
Each zone covers various commission rates & he in-charge of the commissionorate At
present there are 92 commissioners & 71 commissioner (Appeals) they have unlimited
powers of adjudication .
INTRODUCTION TO TOPIC
DEFINITION:
Richard and J. Loy define Quality of Work Life means the degree to much the members of
the working organization are able to satisfy important personnel needs through their experience
in the organization.
Quality of work life denotes all the organizational inputs which aim at the employees
satisfaction and enhancing organizational effectiveness. The basic purpose is to develop jobs and
working conditions that are excellent for employees as well as economic health of organization.
It refers to the level of satisfaction, motivation, commitment and involvement an individual
experience with respect to their line at the work. The quality of work life is the degree of
excellence brought about work and working conditions that contribute to the overall satisfaction
and performance primarily at individual level and finally at organization level.
Quality of Work Life (QWL) has become one of the most important issues these days in every
organization. Employees are the force that is behind every successful organization. No
organization can become successful with technology only because for the use of technology also,
organizations need to have strong work force. Quality of Work Life was the term actually
introduced in the late 1960s. From that period till now the term is gaining more and more
importance everywhere, at every work place. Initially quality of work life was focusing on the
effects of employment on the general well being and the health of the workers. But now its focus
has been changed. Every organization need to give good environment to their workers including
all financial and non financial incentives so that they can retain their employees for the longer
period and for the achievement of the organization goals.. At the end we can say that a happy and
healthy employee will give better turnover, make good decisions and positively contribute to the
organization goal.
The quality of work life is a process by which an organization responds to employee needs for
developing mechanism that allow them to share fully in making decision that designs their life at
work. Thus QWL means having good supervision, good working conditions, good pay and
benefits and interesting, challenging and rewarding job.
Services invites you to hang out at our expanding venues toward the overall enrichment of your
Work Life and toward access to healthier lifestyles.
Improved Quality of Work Life was not considered as important factor in India until recently as
there were important impending factors like resource deficiency, environmental threats and some
services of financial problems.
Quality of Work Life programme has become important in work place for the following reasons:
1. Increase demands at work
2. Loss of long term employee guarantees
3. The need for enhanced work place skills
4. Greater competition for talent
5. Increased women in work fore
Good quality of Work Life leads to an atmosphere of good impersonal relations and highly
motivated employees who strive for their development. Though monetary benefits still occupy
the first place in the cost of elements like physical working conditions, job restructuring and job
re-designing, career development, promotional opportunities etc. are gaining importance rapidly.
As such, workers expect the management to improve all these facilities which thereby improve
Quality of Work life. If provided with good Quality of Work Life, employees concentrate more
on both individual as well as group development which in turn leads to overall development.
According to Walton (1975) proposed eight conceptual categories. They are as follows:
o Adequate and fair compensation
o Safe and healthy working conditions
o Immediate opportunity to use and develop human capacities
WORKLIFE BALANCE
BENEFITS TO THE INDIVIDUAL
ORGANIZATION
Measured increases in
individual productivity,
accountability and
commitment
balance is
communication
Increased productivity
Improved morale
Less negative organizational
stress
Reduced stress
The programs, policies and services through Quality of Work life Programmes:
a. Support faculty and staff efforts to manage the competing demands of work and personal
life
b. Support health promotions and wellness
c. Express appreciation for faculty and staff contribution to the university, highlight
outstanding individual contributions and recognize long term commitment.
The concept of Quality of Work Life views a work as a process of interaction and joint problem
solving by work in people, managers, supervisors and workers.
ii.
iii.
iv.
v.
Problem solving
vi.
Quality of Work life programme has become important in the work place for the
following reasons:
o Increased women in work force
o Increased male involvement in dependant care activities
o Increased responsibilities for elders
o Increased demand at work
The following are the some of the specific issues in Quality of Work life
o Pay and stability of employment
o Occupational stress
o Organizational health programme
o Alternative work schedules
o Participative management and control of work
o Recognition
o Grievance procedure
o Adequacy of resources
o Seniority and merit in promotions
Managerial attitudes
Union influence
the unions.
Key elements:
o Promote human dignity and growth
o Work together collaboratively
o Participative determine work changes
o Assume comparability of people and organizational goals
Job satisfaction is the favorable or unfavorable with which employees view their work. As with
motivation, it is affected by the environment. Job satisfaction is impacted by job design. Jobs that
are rich in positive behavioral elements such as autonomy, variety, task identity, task
significance and feedback contribute to employees satisfaction. Likewise, orientation is
important because the employees acceptance by the work group contributes to satisfaction. In
sort, each element of the environmental system, can add to, or detract from, job satisfaction.
Pay:Quality of work life is basically built around the concept of equitable pay. In this days
ahead, employees may want to participate in the profit of the organization.
People: Almost everyone has to deal with three set of people in the work place. Those
are namely boss, co-workers in the same level and subordinates. Apart from this, some
professions need interaction with people like patients, media persons, public, customers, thieves,
robbers, physically disabled people, mentally challenged, children, foreign delegates, gangsters,
politicians, public figures and celebrities. These situations demand high level of prudence, cool
temper, tactfulness, humor, kindness, diplomacy and sensitiveness.
Worklife balance:
Organisation should provide the relaxation time for employees and offer tips to balance their
personal and professional lives. They should not strain employees personal and social life by
forcing on them by demanding working hours, overtime work, business travel, untiming
transfers.
By the globalization the modern employees are experiencing distress. To meet the challenges
posed by present standards, organizational must focus their attention in bringing a balance
between work life and personal life. The underlying assumption is that work life balance will
ultimately ensure Quality of work life.
Today an employee desires work to be more meaningful and challenging because quality is the
acid test. A Quality of work life gives an opportunity for deep sense of fulfillment. Employees
seek a supportive work environment that will enable them to balance work with personal
interests.
Quality of work life provides a more humanized work environment. It attempts to serve the
higher order needs of workers as well as their basic needs. Quality of Work Life indicates that the
work should not have excessively negative conditions. It should not put workers under undue
stress. It should not damage or degrade their humanness. It should not be threatening or unduly
dangerous.
Employees in several companies that instituted Quality of work life experienced better health
and greater safety on the job. Other benefits included improved employee satisfaction, morale,
job interest, commitment and involvement ; increased opportunity for individual growth ; greater
sense of ownership and control of the work environment development of managerial ability for
circle leaders, improved communication in the organization and greater understanding and
respect between management and workers.
The term Quality of work life has been applied to a wide variety of organizational improvement
efforts. The common elements seem to be, has good man indicates, an attempt to restructure
multiple dimensions of the organizational and to institute a mechanism which introduces and
sustains changes overtime . Aspects of the change mechanism are usually an increase in problem
solving between the union and management
Responsiveness to employee concerns. In every organization, people and their behavior assumes
vital role in determining the performance and effectiveness. While many studies concentrated on
physical and financial performance of organization. Studies on behavioral aspects seem to be
inadequate. So, the attempts must to understand the human side of the enterprise.
The Quality of work life movement provides a value frame work and a philosophy which has a
long term implication for the human development and enrichment. It tries to balance both the
work and family life. Hence integrated approach with regard to Quality of work life is required
for the success of an individual and an organization. This underlines the necessity of searching
studies on the nature of human relations and the problems of human relations and the problems
of human behavior in the organization and suggests measures to cope with the problems. Hence,
an in depth on aspects like Quality of work life can throw light on many non-identified aspects of
human behavior which may help in understanding the issues involved and improving the overall
performance of these organizations. There it is found that there is need to study in greater detail
about the topic
Compensation Structure
Monthly compensation components include:
Gross salary
Annual Benefits
Retirement Benefits
Other Benefits
Annual Benefits:
Gratuity: This is a statutory obligation to the employer to pay gratuity to the employee
who is completed 5 years of service and leaving the company.
Other Benefits:
Certificate duly filled in and send it to the HR Department before your full and final settlement
will be done.
Leave Policy:
There are 5 types of leaves at Tirucchirappalli Central ExciseTechnologies
Casual Leave
Sick Leave
Earned Leave
Maternity Leave
Paternity Leave
Grievances:
If there is any problems, complaints or suggestions can be post to the organizations ID and they
will assure to take care of it.
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
Various authors and researchers have proposed models of Quality of working life which include
a wide range of factors. Selected models are reviewed below.
1.
In this journal, author suggested that the psychological growth needs are relevant to the
consideration of Quality of working life. Several such needs were identified; Skill variety, Task
Identity, Task significance, Autonomy and Feedback. They suggested that such needs have to
be addressed if employees are to experience high quality of working life.
2.
In an investigation of Quality of working life, the author suggested a range of apparently relevant
factors, including work involvement, intrinsic job motivation, higher order need strength,
perceived intrinsic job characteristics, job satisfaction, life satisfaction, happiness. They
discussed a range of correlations derived from their work, such as those between work
involvement and job satisfaction, intrinsic job motivation and job satisfaction, and perceived
intrinsic job characteristics and job satisfaction
3.
In this journal, the authorsuggested that the key factors in quality of working life are: Need
satisfaction based on job requirements, Need satisfaction based on Work environment, Need
satisfaction based on Supervisory behavior. They defined quality of working life as satisfaction
of these key needs through resources, activities, and outcomes stemming from participation in
the workplace. Maslows needs were seen as relevant in underpinning this model, covering
Health & safety, Economic and family, Social, Esteem, Actualization, Knowledge and Aesthetics,
although the relevance of non-work aspects is play down as attention is focused on quality of
work life rather than the broader concept of quality of life. These attempts at defining quality of
working life have included theoretical approaches, lists of identified factors, correlation analyses,
with opinions varying as to whether such definitions and explanations can be both global, or
need to be specific to each work setting.
bring in positive change for betterment of the Quality of Work Life of employees.
6. The objective of the study is also to find out the challenges and difficulties faced by the
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
A Research is a careful investigation or inquiry; especially through search for new facts in any
branch of knowledge .It is a systemized effort to gain more knowledge.
Research methodology is a way to systematically solve the research problem. It may be
understood as a science of studying how research is done scientifically. It is necessary for the
researcher to know not only the research methods or technique but also the methodology.
Researcher always needs to understand the assumption underline various technique and they
need to know the criteria by which they can decide that certain technique and procedures will be
applicable to certain problems and other will not.
Type of research:
The method of conducting research deals with research design, data collection method,
sampTirucchirappalli Central Excisemethod. It explained about the nature of research work to be
done such as descriptive nature of research, which has been used in this study.
Descriptive research:
I have adopted descriptive research design for the purpose of this survey. Descriptive studies are
those studies which is concerned with describing the characteristics of a particular individual, or
of a group.
Types of data
1) Primary data
2)Secondary data
Primary Data:
First time collected data are referred to as primary data. In this research the primary data will be
collected by means of a Structured Questionnaire. The questionnaire consists of number of
questions in printed form. It has both open-end closed end questions in it.
Section I- Personal Data: This section includes questions soliciting the respondents details
such as Age, Gender, Marital status, Education, Designation, section and Work experience.
Section II- Scale for measuring the issues: It comprises of single open ended type and various
close ended questions which includes yes no type, sca Tirucchirappalli Central Excise and other
optional questions.
Secondary Data:
Data which has already gone through the process of analysis or were used by someone else
earlier is referred to secondary data. This type of data will be collected from the books, journals,
company records etc.
Source of Data:
The data has been collecteded from the employees of office of commissionerate of Central
Excise and Service Tax of Trichy.
Sample Size:
Sample size plays a critical role, because the generalizability of the conclusion depends on
sample size. Sample size for the present study will be 200.
S.N
o
Gende
r
No of Respondents
Male
148
74
Female
52
26
Total
200
100
Percentage(
%)
Inference:
From the above table we infer that 74% of data collected from male and 26% of data collected
from female.
Male
Female
74
S.No
Age Group
No of respondents
Percentage(%
)
1
Below 25 yrs
25-35 yrs
38
19
35-45 yrs
56
28
45-55 yrs
64
32
Above 55 yrs
40
20
Total
200
100
Inference:
From the above table we infer that 32% of data collected from age group of 45-55, 28% and
20% of data collected from age group of 35-45 and Above 55% respectively,19% of data
collected from age group of 25-35 and 1% of data collected from age group of below 25 yrs.
28
32
25
19
20
20
15
10
5
0
Below 25 yrs
25-35 yrs
35-45 yrs
45-55 yrs
Above 55 yrs
S.No
Designation
No of respondents
Percentage(%
)
1
Superintendent
60
30
Inspector
88
44
28
14
24
12
Total
200
100
Inference:
From the above table we infer that 44% of data are collected from Inspectors, 30% of the data
are collected from superintendents, 14% of data are collected from Senior Tax Assistants and
12% of the data are collected from Deputy Officer Superintendent.
12
Supt
30
Inspector
14
STA
DOS
44
Section
No of respondents
Percentage(%
)
1
Administrative
28
14
Statistics
28
14
Vigilance
16
Preventive
34
17
Accounts
42
21
Internal Audit
52
26
Total
200
100
Inference:
The above table shows that 26% of data are collected from internal audit section,21% of the
data are collected from Accounts,17% are from preventive section and 8 % are from vigilance
section,14% of the data are collected from administrative section,14% of data are collected from
statistics section.
26
25
21
20
17
14
15
14
8
10
5
In
te
rn
al
Au
di
t
Ac
co
un
ts
Pr
ev
en
tiv
e
vi
gi
la
nc
e
tic
s
St
at
is
Ad
m
in
is
tr
at
iv
e
S.No
Qualification
No of respondents
Percentage(%
)
1
SSLC
12
HSC
UG
122
61
PG
60
30
Total
200
100
Inference:
From the above table we infer that 53% and 33% of respondents has UG and PG Qualification
respectively,8% of respondents are SSLC and 6% of respondents are HSC.
30
UG
61
HSC
SSLC
10
6.
20
30
40
50
60
S.N
o
Experience
No of respondents
Percentage(%
)
70
Less than 5
yrs
28
14
5-10 yrs
24
12
10-15 yrs
20
10
15-20 yrs
42
21
Above 20 yrs
86
43
Total
200
100
Inference:
From the above table we infer that 43% of data collected from respondents having above 20
yrs of experience.21% of data are collected from 15-20 yrs of experience, 14% of data are
collected from respondents having less than 5 yrs of experience, 12%10% of data collected from
respondents having experience of 5-10 yrs and 10-15 yrsrespectively.
45
40
35
30
25
21
20
14
15
12
10
10
5
0
Less than 5 yrs
7.
5-10 yrs
10-15 yrs
15-20 yrs
Above 20 yrs1
S.No
Marital status
No of Respondents
Percentage(%)
Married
174
87
Unmarried
26
13
Total
200
100
Inference:
The above table shows that 84% of respondents are married and 16% of respondents are
unmarried.
13
87
8.
S. No
Level of
satisfaction
Highly satisfied
No. of
Respondent
s
40
Satisfied
118
59
Neutral
28
14
Dissatisfied
12
Highly
dissatisfied
Total
200
percentage(%)
20
100
Inference:
The above table shows that 59% of the respondents are satisfied about their salary and
benefits 20% of respondents are highly satisfied,14% of the respondents are neutral,6% of the
respondents are dissatisfied with salary and benefits and only 1% of the respondents are highly
dissatisfied
Chart representing the Percentage of level of satisfaction with salary and benefits
70
59
60
50
40
30
20
20
14
10
6
1
0
Highly Satisfied
Satisfied
Neutral
S. No
Level of
satisfaction
No. of
Respondents
percentage(%)
Highly satisfied
40
20
Satisfied
122
61
Neutral
28
14
Dissatisfied
Highly
dissatisfied
Total
200
100
Inference:
From the above table we infer that 61% of the respondents are satisfied with their work
assignment , 20% of the respondents are highly satisfied with their work assignment,14% of the
respondents are neutral,4% of the respondents are dissatisfied with their work assignment and
only 1% of the respondent are highly dissatisfied with their work assignment.
at
is
fie
d
H
ig
hl
y
di
ss
at
is
fie
d
eu
tr
al
N
Sa
tis
fie
d
di
ss
H
ig
hl
y
sa
tis
fie
d
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
S. No
Level of
satisfaction
No. of
Respondents
percentage(%)
Highly satisfied
Satisfied
92
46
Neutral
52
26
Dissatisfied
28
14
Highly
dissatisfied
Total
22
11
200
100
Inference:
The above table shows that 46% of the respondents are satisfied with the transfer policies,26%
of the respondents are neutral, 14% of the respondents are dissatisfied,11% of the respondents
are highly dissatisfied and 2% of the respondents are highly satisfied
46
26
14
di
ss
at
is
fie
d
11
H
ig
hl
y
at
is
fie
d
eu
tr
al
N
Sa
tis
fie
d
D
is
s
H
ig
hl
y
sa
tis
fie
d
11. Table representing the level of satisfaction with the promotion policy
S.
Level of
satisfaction
1
2
3
4
5
Highly satisfied
No
percentage(%)
Highly dissatisfied
No. of
Respondents
0
46
32
66
56
Total
200
100
Satisfied
Neutral
Dissatisfied
0
23
16
33
28
Inference:
The above table shows that 33% of the respondents are dissatisfied with the promotion
policies,28% of the respondents are highly dissatisfied, 23% of the respondents are satisfied,
16% of the respondents are neutral, and no one is highly satisfied
28
Dissatisfied
33
Neutral
16
Satisfied
23
Highly satisfied0
0
10
15
20
25
30
35
S. No
Level of
satisfaction
No. of
Respondents
percentage(%)
Highly satisfied
Satisfied
60
30
Neutral
40
20
Dissatisfied
52
26
Highly
dissatisfied
Total
42
21
200
100
Inference:
The above table shows that 30% of the respondents are satisfiedwith the bonus provided for
them, 26% of the respondents are dissatisfied, 21% of the respondents are highly dissatisfied
20% of the respondents are neutral, and only 3% of the respondents are highly satisfied
21
Dissatisfied
26
Neutral
20
Satisfied
30
Highly satisfied
3
0
13.
10
15
20
25
30
35
S. No
Level of
satisfaction
No. of
Respondents
percentage(%)
Highly satisfied
Satisfied
38
19
Neutral
34
17
Dissatisfied
62
31
Highly
dissatisfied
Total
66
33
200
100
Inference:
The above table shows that 33% of the respondents are dissatisfied with the medical check
upprovided by the concern,31% of the respondents are dissatisfied ,19% of the respondents are
satisfied with the medical checkup,17% of the respondents are neutral, and.no one is highly
satisfied with the medical checkup
Chart representing the Percentage of level of Satisfaction with the medical checkup
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
33
31
19
17
at
is
fie
d
hi
gh
ly
di
ss
at
is
fie
d
eu
tr
al
N
sa
tis
fie
d
D
is
s
H
ig
hl
y
sa
tis
fie
d
14. Table representing the level of satisfaction with the recognized list of
hospitals
S. No
Level of
satisfaction
No. of
Respondents
percentage(%)
Highly satisfied
10
Satisfied
74
37
Neutral
72
36
Dissatisfied
22
11
Highly
dissatisfied
Total
22
11
200
100
Inference:
The above table shows that 37% of the respondents are satisfiedwith the authorized list of
hospitals provided by the concern , 36% of the respondents are neutral, 11% of the respondents
are dissatisfied and 11% of the respondents are highly dissatisfied and 5% of the respondents
are highly satisfied.
di
ss
at
is
fie
d
fie
d
H
ig
hl
y
D
is
sa
tis
eu
tr
al
N
sa
tis
fie
d
H
ig
hl
y
sa
tis
fie
d
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
S. No
1
2
3
4
5
Level of
satisfaction
No. of
Respondents
percentage(%)
Highly satisfied
Satisfied
68
34
Neutral
74
37
Dissatisfied
36
18
Highly
dissatisfied
Total
20
10
200
100
Inference:
The above table shows that 1% of the respondents are highly satisfied about the quality and
quantity of food provided in the canteen, 34% of the respondents are satisfied, 37% of the
respondents are neutral, 18% of the respondents are dissatisfied and 10% of the respondents are
highly dissatisfied.
Chart representing the Percentage level of satisfaction with quantity and quality of food
37
34
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
18
10
at
is
fie
d
H
ig
hl
y
di
ss
at
is
fie
d
eu
tr
al
N
sa
tis
fie
d
di
ss
H
ig
hl
y
sa
tis
fie
d
16. Table representing the level of satisfaction with the rate of food available
in the canteen
S. No
1
2
3
4
5
Level of
satisfaction
No. of
Respondents
percentage(%)
Highly satisfied
20
10
Satisfied
120
60
Neutral
40
20
Dissatisfied
20
10
Highly
dissatisfied
Total
200
100
Inference:
From the above table we infer that 60% of the respondents are satisfiedabout the rate food
available in the canteen, 20% of the respondents are neutral, 10% of the respondents are highly
satisfied10% of the respondents are dissatisfied about the rate of food in the canteen and no one
is highly dissatisfied.
Chart representing the Percentage level of satisfaction with the rate of food available in the canteen
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
10
60
20
Highly satisfied
Satisfied
Neutral
10
0
Dissatisfied Highly dissatisfied
S. No
Level of
satisfaction
No. of
Respondent
s
percentage(%)
Highly satisfied
Satisfied
94
47
Neutral
72
36
Dissatisfied
30
15
Highly
dissatisfied
Total
200
100
Inference:
From the above table we infer that 47% of the respondents are satisfied about the grievance
redressel, 36% of the respondents are neutral, 15% of the respondents are dissatisfied 2% of the
respondents are highly dissatisfied and no respondents are highly satisfied
H
ig
hl
y
di
ss
at
is
fie
d
fie
d
eu
tr
al
N
Sa
tis
fie
d
D
is
sa
tis
H
ig
hl
y
sa
tis
fie
d
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
S. No
Rate
No. of
Respondents
percentage(%)
1
2
3
4
5
42
21
82
41
52
26
24
12
Total
200
100
Inference:
From the above table we infer that , 41% of the respondents rated 4 out of 5for seating
arrangement,26% of the respondents rated 3 out of 5, 21% of the respondents rated 5 out of 5
for seating arrangement,12% of the respondents rated 2 out of 5 and no respondents rated 1 out
of 5 for seating arrangement.
S. No
Rate
No. of
Respondents
percentage(%)
46
23
102
51
52
26
Total
200
100
Inference:
The above table shows that51% of the respondents rated 4 out of 5for computer configuration,
26% of the respondents rated 3 out of 5 , 23% of the respondents rated 5 out of 5, no one rated 2
out of 5 and 1 out of 5 for computer configuration
Percentage
60
50
40
Percentage
30
20
10
0
5
S. No
1
2
3
4
5
Rate
No. of
Respondents
percentage(%)
18
66
33
64
32
32
16
20
10
Total
200
100
Inference:
The above table shows that, 33% of the respondents rated 4 out of 5 for ventilation and A/C,
32% of the respondents rated 3 out of 5,16% of the respondents rated 2 out of 5, 10% of the
respondents rated 1 out of 5 9% of the respondents rated 5 out of 5 for ventilation and A/C.
S. No
1
2
3
4
5
Rate
No. of
Respondents
percentage(%)
56
28
96
48
48
24
Total
200
100
Inference:
The above table shows that 48% of the respondents rated 4 out of 5 for lightings, 28% of the
respondents rated 5 out of 5, 24% of the respondents rated 3 out of 5,no respondents rated 2 out
of 5 and 1 out of 5 for lighting facility .
S. No
1
2
3
4
5
Rate
No. of
Respondents
percentage(%)
108
54
44
22
48
24
Total
200
100
Inference:
The above table shows that 54% of the respondents rated 3 out of 5for fire extinguisher, 24% of
the respondents rated 1 out of 5,22 % of the respondents rated 2 out of 5no one rated 5 out of 5
and 4 out of 5.
54
50
40
30
20
22
24
10
0
50
0
4
S. No
Variables
No. of
Respondents
percentage(%)
Strongly agree
34
17
Agree
122
61
Moderate
32
16
Disagree
12
Strongly
disagree
Total
200
100
Inference:
The above table shoes that 61% of the respondents agreed that their superiors are cooperative,
17% of the respondents strongly agreed, 16% of the respondents are moderate, 6 % of the
respondents are disagreed and no one is strongly disagreed that their superiors are cooperative.
17
16
10
0
Strongly agree
Agree
Moderate
Disagree
Strongly0disagree
Levels
Strongly agree
Agree
Moderate
Disagree
Strongly
disagree
Total
No. of
Respondents
22
98
60
6
14
percentage(%)
200
100
11
49
30
3
7
Inference:
From the above table, we infer that 49% of the respondents are agreed about their workspace
satisfaction, 30% of the respondents are moderate,11% of the respondents are strongly agreed
that they are satisfied about their work space,7% of the respondents are highly disagreed about
their workspace satisfaction,3% of the respondents are disagreed.
35
30
25
20
15
11
7
10
5
0
Strongly agree
Agree
Moderate
Disagree
Strongly disagree
Variables
percentage
Strongly disagree
No. of
Respondents
12
84
58
38
8
Total
200
100
Strongly agree
1
2
3
4
5
Agree
Moderate
Disagree
6
42
29
19
4
Inference:
The above table shows that 42% of the respondents agreed that they are given freedom to offer
suggestions on official matters, 29% of the respondents are moderate, 19% of the respondents
disagreed, 6% of the respondents are strongly agreed and 4% of the respondents strongly
disagreed.
Strongly disagree
19
disagree
29
Moderate
42
Agree
6
Strongly agree
0
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Variables
percentage(%)
Strongly disagree
No. of
Respondent
s
2
94
78
6
20
1
2
3
4
5
Strongly agree
Total
200
100
No
Agree
Moderate
Disagree
1
47
39
3
10
Inference:
The above table shows that that 47% of the respondents agreedthey are getting reward for
outstanding performance, 39% of the respondents are neutral, 10% of the respondents strongly
disagreed, 3% of the respondents disagreed and 1% of the respondents strongly agreed.
Strongly disagree
3
Disagree
39
Moderate
47
Agreed
1
Strongly agree
0
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Level of
satisfaction
1
2
3
4
5
Strongly agree
No
percentage(%)
Strongly disagree
No. of
Respondents
8
106
60
26
0
Total
200
100
Agree
Moderate
Disagree
4
53
30
13
0
Inference:
The above table shows that 53% of the respondents are satisfied, 30% of the respondents are
neutral, 13% of the respondents are dissatisfied only 3% of the respondents are highly satisfied
with the training given for them, and no respondents are highly dissatisfied about the training
given for them.
Disagree
13
Moderate
30
Agree
53
Strongly agree
4
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
S.No
Variables
No. of Respondents
Yes
140
70
No
60
30
Total
200
100
Percentage(%)
Inference:
The above table shows that 70% of the respondents required that the speciality hospitals to be
added in the list of hospitals provided by the concern, 30% of the respondents do not require the
specialty hospitals to be added in the list of hospitals provided.
rt representing the Percentage of requirement of speciality hospitals to be added in th list of hospitals provided
30
70
Variables
No. of Respondents
percentage(%
)
1
Yes
168
84
No
32
16
Total
200
100
Inference:
The above table shows that 84% of the respondents required the health and fitness club
and 16% of the respondents do not require the health and fitness club.
84
Variables
No. of
Respondents
percentage(%)
Always
34
17
Often
28
14
Occasionally
28
14
Rare
88
44
Never
20
10
Total
200
100
Inference:
The above table shows that 44% of the respondents are getting feedback rarely,17% of the
respondents are always getting feedback on their performance, 14% of the respondents are
getting feedback often ,14% of the respondents are getting feedback occasionally, and only10%
of the respondents never getting feedback.
50
45
40
35
30
percentage(%)
25
20
15
10
5
0
Always
Often
Occasionally
Rare
31. Table representing the opinion about the overall quality of work life
S. No
Variables
No. of
Respondents
percentage(%)
Excellent
16
Very good
62
31
Typical
108
54
Fair
14
poor
Total
200
100
1
2
3
4
5
Inference:
The above table shows that54% of the respondents feel that the overall quality of work life is
typical, 31% of the respondents feel very good,8 % of the respondents feel that the overall
quality of work life is excellent, 7% of the respondents feel fair and no respondents feel that the
overall quality of worklife is poor.
Chart representing the Percentage of opinion about the overall quality of worklife
54
60
50
40
31
30
20
8
10
0
Excellent
Very good
Good
Poor
0
Very Poor
Designation of
the
respondents
dissatisfi
Dissatisfi
ed
ed
Supt
Inspector
Senior Tax
Assistant
Deputy
officer
superintende
0
3
3
6
Neutral
3
2
Satisfie
satisfie
d
37
66
11
17
Total
54
94
14
29
23
15
17
125
40
200
nt
Total
Correlation
Asymp.
Std.
Value
Interval by
Pearson's R
Interval
Ordinal by
Spearman
Ordinal
Correlation
N of Valid Cases
Inference:
Error(a
Approx
Approx.
. T(b)
Sig.
-.120
.123
-.997
.322(c)
-.118
.128
-.978
.331(c)
70
The above table infers that there is negative correlation between the designation and level of
satisfaction with the work assignment. Therefore designation doesnt influence the level of
satisfaction with the work assignment.
33. Table representing the relationship between the gender of the respondents
and the level of satisfaction with transfer Policies
Male
Total
17
28
28
76
151
23
14
49
22
33
51
90
200
the
respondent
Femal
e
Total
Chi-Square Tests
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
4.669(a
)
4.461
.032
df
0.32
.047
.859
70
Inference:
The significant value 0.32 is greater than 0.05, hence null hypothesis is accepted. Therefore it is
concluded that there is no relationship between the gender of the respondents and transfer
policies.
34. Table representing the relationship between Age group of the respondents
and the level of satisfaction with medical check up
Total
Age group of
Below 25 yrs
the
25-35yrs
17
37
respondents
35-45yrs
23
20
16
61
45-55 yrs
23
20
11
62
Above 55 yrs
11
11
38
71
57
32
40
200
Total
Chi-Square Tests
Pearson ChiSquare
Likelihood
Ratio
Linear-byLinear
Value
df
10.635(a)
12
.560
10.074
12
.609
.311
.577
Association
N of Valid Cases
70
Inference:
Significant value 0.560 is greater than 0.05, hence null hypothesis is accepted. So it is inferred
that there is no relationship between age group and medical checkup.
H1:There is significant relationship between the marital status of the respondents and the level
of satisfaction with transfer Policies
Single
Married
Total
Total
11
10
26
11
22
28
28
49
52
80
90
6
8
174
200
Sig.
3.146
.081
ANOVA
Sum of
Square
df
s
Between
Groups
Within
Groups
Total
Mean
Square
3.562
3.562
77.009
69
1.132
80.571
70
Inference:
Significant value 0.081 is greater than 0.05, hence null hypothesis is accepted. Therefore it is
concluded that there is no relationship between the marital status of the respondents and the
level of satisfaction with transfer Policies
36. Table representing the relationship between the designation and the
Opinion about overall Quality of work life
Assumption:
H0: There is no significant relationship between designation and the Opinion about overall
Quality of work life
H1: There is significant relationship between designation and the Opinion about overall Quality
of work life
Opinion about overall Quality of worklife
Very
Excelle
Poor
Designation of
the
respondents
Supt
Inspector
Senior Tax
Assistant
Deputy officer
superintendent
Total
Fair
0
3
3
3
Typical
28
17
19
18
Good
20
37
nt
12
11
63
71
16
37
17
23
81
73
25
200
ANOVA
Between
Groups
Within
Groups
Total
Inference:
Total
Sum of
Square
s
df
Mean
Square
Sig.
4.087
1.362
2.322
.043
38.713
67
.587
42.800
70
Significant value 0.043 is lesser than 0.05, hence null hypothesis is rejected. It is concluded that
the designation influences the opinion about the overall quality of work life.
In the current scenario every organization expects their employees to perform at their
peak potential. Though monetary aspects play an important role in motivating employees,
organization around the world have come to understand that there are many other aspects that
contributes better employee performance. It is these aspects that form the basis for this study. In
particular this study aims to identify the various tangible and intangible aspects that contribute to
the quality of the workplace. It is very important for an organization to create a very conducive
working environment for employees.
This study is needed to ensure that all employees are performing at their peak potential,
free from stress and strain, and to ensure all their needs are fully satisfied. This study will be
used as feedback from employees to know their current perspective of workplace and also to
identify the areas of improvement for the organization.
The term Quality of work life in its broader sense covers various aspects of employment and
non-employment conditions of work. This study covers the overall quality of work life of
employees, i.e. their job satisfaction, work environment, working hours, work stress, their
relation with their colleagues, work assignments, infrastructure provided etc ..The present study
aims at measuring the level of satisfaction of employees and to know about the various welfare
activities and benefits provided for the employees. The study is dependent on the opinion
expressed by all the employees of all the departments.
Quality of work life is a multi dimensional aspect. Some of these aspects are
By providing better quality of work life, the following results can be achieved.
FINDINGS:
General observation:
Most of the employees are satisfied with salary and benefits.
Most of the employees are satisfied with their work space and work assignment.
Most of the employees are satisfied with transfer policies but some of North Indian
employees are dissatisfied about the transfer policies.
Most of the employees are satisfied with the quality, quantity and rate of food in the
canteen
The superiors are cooperative
Most of the employees required health and fitness club.
Most of the employees required the speciality hospitals to be added in the authorized list
of hospitals provided.
34% of the respondents are satisfied and 18% of the respondents are dissatisfied with the
quality and quantity of food available in the canteen.
60% of the respondents are satisfied and only 10% of the respondents are dissatisfied
about the rate of food available in the canteen.
Only 23% of the respondents are satisfied with the promotion policies and 33% of the
respondents are dissatisfied.
Merely 61% of the respondents agreed that their superiors are cooperative and only 6% of
the respondents are disagreed.
Merely 31% of the respondents feel that the overall quality of work life is very good and
no respondents feel poor.
Only 17% of the respondents are getting always feedback for their performance and 44%
of the respondents are getting feedback on yearly report basis and 10% of the respondents
are never getting feedback.
53% of the respondents are satisfied with the training given for them and only 13% of
the respondents are dissatisfied.
47% of the respondents are agreed that they are getting reward for their outstanding
performance.
42% of the respondents agreed that they are given freedom to offer suggestion on official
matters and 19% of the respondents are disagreed.
21% of the respondents rated 5 out of 5 for seating arrangement, 41% of the respondents
rated 4 out of 5 for seating arrangement and no respondents rated 1 out of 5 for seating
arrangement.
23% of the respondents rated 5 out of 5 for computer configuration, 51% of the
respondents rated 4 out of 5 and no one rated 2 out of 5 and 1 out of 5 for computer
configuration.
9% of the respondents rated 5 out of 5 for ventilation and A/C
28% of the respondents rated 5 out of 5 for lightings, 48% of the respondents rated 4 out
of 5 and no respondents rated 2 out of 5 and 1 out of 5 for lighting facility.
No one rated 5 out of 5 and 4 out of 5 for fire extinguisher.
There is no relationship between the gender of the respondents and transfer policies
There is no relationship between age group and medical checkup
The designation of the respondents influences the opinion about the overall quality of
work life.
The designation doesnt influence the level of satisfaction with salary and benefits
SUGGESTION:
Job satisfactions are found to be good and it can improve by providing the satisfactory
seating arrangement.
The organization can provide separate computers on each table so that they can reduce
paper works and increase speed and accuracy in maintenance and retrieval of records
The organization can provide regular medical checkup for improving the medical
facilities.
The organization can provide bus/cab facilities from quarters to office.
The organization can provide effective training for efficient performance of employees.
The Organization can appoint special computer trainee to meet out the present
Conclusion:
Every organization has to satisfy some of the basic needs and demands of its employees
because the satisfied and motivated employees are the source of achieving the organizational
goals and objectives. In order to use the maximum potential of the human resource, the
organization has to provide them with the best quality of their working life. Therefore every
organization needs to update and improve the quality of work life of the employees.
From the study it is clear that the overall quality of work life of employees is good in the
office of commissioner of central excise and service tax department of Trichy. This research
highlights some of the small gaps in employees satisfaction towards the quality of work life.
Annexure
Questionnaire
Personal Details:
:
Gender
Male
Female
: SSLC+2UGPG
Designation
Section
Marital status
___________________________
: SingleMarried
: Less than 5 yrs 5-10 yrs 10-15 yrs 15-20yrs
Experience
Above20 yrs
Pay and
Highly
satisfied
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Previlages
Salary and benefits
Work Assignment
Transfer policies
Promotion policies
Bonus
Medical Check up
List of recognized
hospitals
Quality & Quantity
of food provided in
canteen
Satisfied
Neutral
Dissatisfied
Highly
dissatisfied
Rate of food
10
provided in canteen
Grievance
Redressel
Infrastructure
Seating Arrangement
Computer configuration
Ventilation, A/c
Lights
Fire extinguisher
Very good
Good
Average
poor
Very Poor
Statements
Strongly Agree
Agree
Moderate
disagree
Strongly
disagree
cooperative
I am comfortable
with the present
workspace
allotment
I am given
freedom to offer
suggestions on
official work
I am rewarded for
my outstanding
work.
I am satisfied with
training
given for me
Requirement
Do you require any specialty hospital to be added in the
Yes
No
6.
Often
Occasionally
Rare
Never
Very good
Typical
Fair
poor
8. Any suggestions would you like to improve overall quality of work life in your organization?
Reference
Books:
1. K. Human Resources and Personnel Management
Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing Company Limited, New Delhi-110 001
2. C.R. Kothari Research Methodology of WishwaPrakashan publishing, Chennai -17
Websites:
www.citehr.edu
www.mbaguys.net
www.centralexcisetrichy.gov.in