Highways Retaining Wall AIP

CONTROL SHEET
CLIENT:
PROJECT TITLE:
REPORT TITLE:
APPROVAL IN PRINCIPLE
PROJECT REFERENCE:
Issue and Approval Schedule:

ISSUE 1
Name
Signature
Date
<STATUS>
Prepared by
Reviewed by
Approved by
Revision Record:
Issue
Date
Status
Description
By
Chk
App
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
This report has been prepared in accordance with procedure OP/P03 of W A

Fairhurst & Partners' Quality Assurance System.
Engineering/Highways Retaining Wall AIP
1.0
HIGHWAY DETAILS
1.1
Type of Highway
All purpose carriageway with adjacent verges.
1.2
Permitted Traffic Speed

30mph (48kph) adjacent.
1.3
Existing Weight Restriction

Not applicable.
2.0
SITE DETAILS
2.1
Obstacles Retained
All purpose carriageway.
3.0
PROPOSED STRUCTURE
3.1
Description of Structure
The reinforced concrete contiguous bored pile retaining wall which will
retain Assheton Way and an adjacent paved verge. A vehicle restraint
system will be fixed on top of the retaining wall to restrain errant vehicles.
3.2
Structural Type
Reinforced concrete contiguous bored pile retaining wall with a reinforced
concrete capping beam connecting the piles together.
3.3
Foundation Type
600m diameter reinforced concrete contiguous bored pile.
The pile length will vary dependant on the effective retained height and
adapted to suit the ground conditions.
3.4
Span Arrangements
Not applicable.
3.5
Articulation Arrangements
Not applicable.
3.6
Types of Road Restraint Systems

The road restraint system shall be a Vehicular Restraint System in
accordance with TD19/06 with a Containment Class of N1 and a Working
Width of W3.
3.7
Proposed Arrangements for Maintenance and Inspection

3.7.1
Traffic Management
Traffic management for inspection and maintenance to be
described in an appropriate method statement and shall be in
accordance with Chapter 8 of the Traffic Signs and General
Directions.
3.7.2
Access
Access to exposed face of retaining walls will be by ladder or
hydraulic access platform as considered most appropriate for
access.
Access to the retaining wall will be from the verge.
3.8
Sustainability Issues Considered. Materials and Finishes

CONCRETE STRENGTH, fcu
Pile
C32/40 to BS EN 206-1
Capping beam, concrete fascia
C40/50 to BS EN 206-1
Binding
EXPOSURE CONDITION
ST1
Pile
Chloride Class XD2

Carbonation Class XC2
Chloride Class XD3
Carbonation Class XC3

REINFORCEMENT
NOMINAL COVER TO
REINFORCEMENT
Freeze Thaw Attack Class XF2

Grade B500B to BS 4449
Pile
75mm
(50 + c)mm
Allowance in design for deviation, c = 15mm in
accordance with Interim Advice Note IAN 95/07.
Vertical buried surfaces
F1
FINISHES
Vertical exposed surfaces of capping beam
F3
Featured finish (to be agreed)
F6
Buried top surface
U1
Exposed top surface
U3
COATING TO CONCRETE
RETAINING WALL
SURFACES
MOVEMENT JOINT
All buried concrete surfaces to be waterproofed

with two coats of bituminous paint or equivalent
as SHW Clause 204.
All exposed concrete surfaces will be treated with
hygrophobic
pore
lining
impregnant
in
accordance with BD 43/03.
20mm joints to be at 10.5m maximum centres
using expanded polyethylene joint filter.
Joints to be sealed using polysulphide joint
sealant.
3.9
Risks and Hazards Considered

The following risks have been considered.
3.10
Problems of collapse of the trench temporary sheet piles are

required.
Problems of demolition of the existing footing.
Air pollution control the dust in air during construction.
Construction noise.
Construction adjacent to live carriageway temporary local lane

closures or narrow running lane will be required.
Fall from height designed out with the use of vehicle/pedestrian

restraint system.
Unsuitable ground conditions a geotechnical investigation is being

carried out at each site.
In services hazards errant vehicles to be contained by adjacent road

restraint system.
Estimated Cost of Proposed Structure together with other Structural

Forms considered, including where appropriate Proprietary
Manufactured Structure and the reasons for their rejection including
Comparative Whole Life Costs with Dates of Estimates.
Other forms of retaining walls (reinforced concrete cantilever, sheet pile)
have been considered to accommodate the site requirements. The
reinforced concrete bored pile option has been adopted as the preferred
retaining wall. The main reasons for choosing this option over other forms
of retaining walls are:
The adjacent carriageway has to be kept open to traffic during the

construction work.
The retaining wall will have to resist vehicular impact from the
carriageway.
There will be less excavation involved compared to the reinforced

concrete cantilever retaining wall.
There will be less environmental impact from the construction on the

surrounding area.
Cost of the reinforced concrete bored pile option is cheaper than the
other forms of retaining walls.
Negates any requirement for temporary works to retain the adjacent

carriageway during the construction of reinforced concrete cantilever
retaining wall.
The overall construction time will be shorter.
The estimated cost (Q2 2007) for the construction of the reinforced
concrete bored pile retaining wall and installation of the vehicle restraint
system is 113,000. The cost excludes preliminaries, optimism bias and
traffic management.
3.11
Proposed Arrangements for Construction

3.11.1 Traffic Management
The works are to be constructed within a one lane closure of the
carriageway.
3.11.2 Service Diversions
Service plans to be identified and diverted.
3.11.3 Interface with Existing Structures
The proposed retaining wall will interface with the existing subway
wing wall. The proposed retaining wall will be installed first before
the demolition of the existing retaining wall.
4.0
DESIGN CRITERIA
4.1
Live Loading, Headroom

4.1.1
Loading relating to normal traffic under AW Regulations and

C & U Regulations
Full HA live load surcharge of 10 kN/m in accordance with

BD37/01.
4.1.2
Loading Relating to General Order Traffic under STGO

Regulations
HB (37.5 units) live load surcharge of 16kN/m in accordance with
BD37/01.
4.1.3
Footway or Footbridge Live Loading

5kN/m footway loading in accordance with BD37/01
4.1.4
Loading relating to Special Order Traffic, Provision for

Exceptional Abnormal Loads Indivisible Loads including
Location of Wheel Track on Deck Cross Section
SV 150 STGO vehicle in accordance with BD 86/04.
4.1.5
Any Special Loading not covered Above

Vehicle impact load in accordance with TD19/06 and BD37/01.
4.1.6
Heavy or High Load Route Requirements and Arrangements

being made to Preserve the Route, including any Provision
for Future Heavier Loads or Future Widening
Assheton Way is classified as a 150 tonne heavy load route.
4.1.7
Minimum Headroom Provided

Not applicable.
4.1.8
Authorities Consulted and Any Special Conditions Required

Statutory undertakers were consulted to ascertain the presence of
plant. These consultations indicated there are:
North West Water
There are 2 No existing 750mm diameter combined drains within
the vicinity of the retaining wall. The utility is impacted by the
alignment of the retaining wall.
Norweb
There is an electric cable (size unknown) within the vicinity of the
retaining wall. This utility is impacted by the alignment of the
retaining wall.
Transco
There are an existing gas main (diameter and type unknown)
within the vicinity of the retaining wall. This utility will be
abandoned.
4.2
List of Relevant Documents from the TAS

See attached schedule in Appendix B, where the relevant documents are
highlighted.
4.2.1
Additional Relevant Standards
BS EN 206-1 Concrete Part 1 Specification, performance

production and conformity.
IAN 41/02 European Cement Standards.
IAN 48/03: Measures to Minimise the Risk of Sulphate Attack
(including Thaumasite): New Construction and Structures under
Construction.
BS 866: 2005 Scheduling. Dimensioning, Bending and Cutting of
Steel Reinforcement for Concrete.
IAN 70/06 Implementation of New Reinforcement Standards (BS
4449:2005, BS 4482:2005, BS4483:2005, BS8666:2005).
IAN 05/96 BD24/92 The Design of Concrete Highway Bridges and
Structures.
IAN 95/07 Revised Guidance Regarding The Use of BS8500
(2006) for The Design and Construction of Structures using
Concrete.
BS 8500-1: 2006 Concrete Complementary British Standard to
BS EN 206-1 Part 1: Method of Specifying and Guidance for the
Specifier.
BS 8500-2: 2006 Concrete Complementary British Standard to
BS EN 206-1 Part 2: Specification for Constituent Materials and
Concrete.
4.3
Proposed Departures from Standards given in 4.2 and 4.2.1

None.
4.4
Proposed Methods of Dealing with aspects not covered by

Standards in 4.2 and 4.2.1
None.
5.0
STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS
5.1
Methods of Analysis Proposed for Superstructure, Substructure and

Foundations
The retaining wall will be analysed statically by hand on a metre strip

basis or per pile basis as an embedded cantilever beam in accordance
with BD 42/00. The wall will be subjected to horizontal earth pressure,
live load surcharge and vehicle impact load where applicable.
5.2
Description and Diagram of Idealised Structure to be used for

Analysis
5.3
Assumptions intended for calculation of structural element stiffness

Flexural stiffness of elements will be based on plain uncracked sections
and will be calculated from the gross concrete sections ignoring any steel
reinforcement.
5.4
Proposed Earth Pressure Coefficients (ka, ko or kp) to be used in

Design of Earth Retaining Elements
Pulverised Fill Ash (PFA) layer:
Structural Fill (SF2/SF3) layer:
Alluvium layer:
Glaciofluvial Deposits:
6.0
Ka = 0.33, Kp = 3.0,
Ka = 0.27, Kp = 3.7,
Ka = 0.41, Kp = 2.44,
Ka = 0.33, Kp = 3.0,
the
Ko = 0.5.
Ko = 0.43
Ko = 0.58
Ko = 0.5.
GEOTECHNICAL CONDITIONS
6.1
Acceptance of Recommendations of Section 8 of the Geotechnical

Report to be used in the design and reasons for any proposed
changes.
Extracts from Section 8 of the Geotechnical Report and all relevant Form
Cs will be supplied in a Separate Addendum.
Awaiting geotechnical investigation results.
6.2
Geotechnical Report Highway Structure Summary Information

(Form C)
10
To be supplied in a separate Addendum.

6.3
Differential Settlement to be allowed for in the design of the

Structure
Not applicable.
6.4
If the Geotechnical Report is not yet available, State when the

Results are expected and List the Sources of Information used to
justify the Preliminary Choice of Foundations
The Geotechnical Report will be available in early November 2007.
The proposed earth pressure coefficients stated above is taken from the
Ground Investigation Final Factual Report No. 2100, July 2001 for Tesco
Stores Ltd., Middleton.
7.0
CHECKING
7.1
Proposed Category
Category 1.
11
7.2
If Category 3, Name of Proposed Independent Checker

Not applicable.
7.3
Erection Proposals or Temporary Works for which an Independent

Check will be required, listing parts of the Structure affected with
reasons for Recommending an Independent Check
Not applicable.
8.0
DRAWINGS AND DOCUMENTS

8.1
List of Drawings (including

Accompanying the Submission
Appendix A
Appendix B
Appendix C
9.0
10.0
Numbers)
and
Documents
General Arrangement Drawings

Technical Approval Schedule (TAS) August 2007
Extract of Results from Geotechnical Investigation.
THE ABOVE IS SUBMITTED FOR ACCEPTANCE
Signed
Name
Engineering Qualifications
Date
THE ABOVE IS REJECTED/AGREED SUBJECT TO THE AMENDMENTS AND

CONDITIONS BELOW
Signed
Name
Position Held
Engineering Qualifications
TAA
12
Date
13
APPENDIX A
GENERAL ARRANGEMENT DRAWING
APPENDIX B
TECHNICAL APPROVAL SCHEDULE (TAS)
TECHNICAL APPROVAL SCHEDULE
Schedule of Documents Relating to Design or Assessment of Highway Bridges

and Structures
All relevant documents are identified with a tick on the left hand side, and the print colour
changed to black.
British Standards
BS 5268: Part 2 2002
Structural Use of Timber.
BS 5400:
Steel Concrete and Composite Bridges
Part 1 1988
General Statement (See BD 15 (DMRB 1.3.2)).
Part 2: 2006
Specification for Loads (as implemented by BD 37 (DMRB 1.3)).
Part 3: 2000
CP for design of steel bridges (see BD 13 (DMRB 1.3)).
Part 4: 1990
CP for design of concrete bridges (see BD 24 (DMRB 1.3.1)).
Part 5: 1979
CP for design of composite bridges (see BD 16 (DMRB 1.3)).
Part 9.1: 1983
CP for design of bridge bearings (see BD 20 (DMRB 2.3.1)).
Part 10: 1980
CP for fatigue (See BD 0 (DMRB 1.3)).
Part 10C: 1990
Charts for classification of details for fatigue.
BS 5628: Part 1: 1992
Unreinforced Masonry.
BS5930; 1999
Site Investigations.
BS 6031: 1981
Earthworks.
BS 8002: 1994
Earth retaining structures.
BS 8004: 1986
Foundations.
BS 8118: Part 1: 1991
The structural use of aluminium. CP for design.
BS
EN
1317-1-1998
Road Restraint Systems Part 1
Terminology and general criteria for test methods.
BS
EN
1317-2-1998
Road Restraint Systems
-Part 2
Performance classes, impact test acceptance criteria and test

methods for safety barriers.
BS
EN
1317-3-2000
Road Restraint Systems Part 3
Performance classes, impact test acceptance criteria and test

methods for crash cushions.
Tick relevant standards and blacken test
Department of Transport Local Government and the Regions (DTLR)
Railway Group Approved Code of Practice GC/RC5510: Recommendations for the

Design of Bridges (1998).
Railway Group Approved Code of Practice GC/RT5204: Structure Gauging and
Clearances.
Simplified Tables of External Loads on Buried Pipelines (1986).
Miscellaneous
Circular Roads No. 61/72 Routes for heavy and high abnormal loads.
The Manual of Contract Documents for Highway Works (MCDHW)
Volume 1: Specification for Highway Works May 2007.
Volume 2: Notes for Guidance on the Specification for Highway Works May 2007.
Volume 3: Highway Construction Details November 2006.
Bridges and Structures, Advice Notes (BA Series) from Design Manual for Roads
and Bridges (DMRB)
Document
Reference
BA 9/81
BA 16/97
Title
Date of
Issue
The use of BS 5400: Part 10: 1980: Code of

Practice for Fatigue
Dec 1981
Amendment No. 1
Nov 1983
The Assessment
Structures.
of
Highway
Bridges
and
May 1987
Decimal
Reference
1.3
3.4.4
Amendment No. 1
Nov 1997
BA 19/85
The Use of BS 5400: Part 3: 1982
Jan 1985
1.3
BA 24/87
Early Thermal Cracking of Concrete
Jul 1987
1.3
Amendment No. 1
Aug 1989
BA 26/94
Expansion Joints for Use in Highway Bridge

Decks
Nov 1994
2.3.7
BA 27/99
Quality Assurance Scheme for Paints and Similar

Protective Coatings
Aug 1999
2.4.2
BA 28/92
Evaluation of Maintenance Costs in Comparing

Alternative Designs for Highway Structures
Aug 1992
1.2.2
BA 30/94
Strengthening of Concrete Highway Structures

using Externally Bonded Plates
Feb 1994
3.3.1
BA 34/90
Technical Requirements for the Assessment and

Strengthening Programme for Highway Structures.
Sep 1990
3.4
Stage 1 Older Short Span Bridges and Retaining

Structures
BA 35/90
Inspection and Repair of Concrete Highway

Structures
Jun 1990
3.3
BA 36/90
The Use of Permanent Formwork
Feb 1991
2.3
BA 37/92
Priority Ranking of Existing Parapets
Oct 1992
2.3.2
BA 38/93
Assessment of the Fatigue Life of Corroded or

Damaged Reinforcing Bars
Oct 1990
3.4.5
BA 39/93
Assessment of Reinforced Concrete Half-joints
Apr 1993
3.4.6
BA 40/93
Tack Welding of Reinforcing Bars
Apr 1993
1.3.4
BA 41/98
The Design and Appearance of Bridges
Feb 1998
1.3.11
BA 42/96
The Design of Integral Bridges (incorporating

Amendment No. 1 dated May 2003}
Nov 1996
1.4.12
BA 43/94
Strengthening, Repair and Monitoring of Posttensioned Concrete Bridge Decks
Dec 1994
3.3.2
BA 44/96
Assessment of Concrete Highway Bridge and

Structures
Nov 1996
3.4.15
Document
Reference
Title
Date of
Issue
Decimal
Reference
BA 47/99
Waterproofing and surfacing of Concrete Bridge

Decks
Aug 199
2.3.5
BA 50/93
Post-tensioned Concrete Bridges.

Planning,
Organisation and Methods for carrying out Special
Inspections.
Jul 1993
3.1.3
BA 51/95
The Assessment of Concrete Structures affected

by Steel Corrosion
Feb 1995
3.4.13
BA 52/94
The Assessment of Concrete Highway Structures

affected by Alkali Silica Reaction
Nov 1994
3.4.10
BA 53/94
Bracing Systems and the Use of U-Frames in

Steel Highway Bridges
Dec 1994
1.3.13
BA 54/94
Load Testing for Bridge Assessment
Apr 1994
3.4.8
BA 55/06
The Assessment of Bridge Substructures and

Foundations, Retaining Walls and Buried
Structures
May 2006
3.4.9
BA 56/96
The Assessment of Steel Highway Bridges and

Structures
Nov 1996
3.4.12
BA 57/01
Design for Durability
Aug 2001
1.3.8
BA 58/94
Design of Bridges and Concrete Structures with

External Unbonded Prestressing
Nov 1994
1.3.10
BA 59/94
Design of Highway Bridges for Hydraulic Action
May 1994
1.3.6
BA 61/96
The Assessment of Composite Highway Bridges
Nov 1996
3.4.17
BA 63/94
Inspection of Highway Structures
Oct 1994
3.1.5
BA 67/96
Enclosure of Bridges
Aug 1996
2.2.8
BA 68/97
Crib Retaining Walls
Feb 1997
2.1.4
BA 72/03
Maintenance of Road Tunnels
May 2003
3.2.3
BA 74/06
Assessment of Scour at Highway Bridges
Aug 2006
3.4.21
BA 80/99
Use of Rockbolts
Feb 1999
2.1.7
BA 82/00
Formation of Continuity Joints in Bridge Decks
Nov 2000
2.3.7
BA 83/02
Cathodic Protection for use

Concrete Highway Structures
Reinforced
Feb 2002
3.3.3
BA 84/02
Use of Stainless Steel Reinforced in Highway

Structures
Feb 2002
1.3.15
BA 85/04
Coatings for Highway Structures and Ancillary

Structures
May 2004
2.4.3
BA 86/06
Advice Notes on the Non-Destructive Testing of

Highway Structures
Aug 2006
3.1.7
BA 87/04
Management of Corrugated Steel

Structures (Correction to Page D/4)
Feb 2006
3.3.4
BA 88/04
Management of Buried Concrete Box Structures
Aug 2004
3.3.5
BA 92/07
The Use of Recycled Concrete Aggregates in

Structural Concrete
May 2007
2.3.6
in
Buried
Bridges and Structures, Standards (BD Series) from Design Manual for Roads and
Bridges (DMRB)
Document
Reference
Title
Date of
Issue
Decimal
Reference
BD 2/05
Technical Approval of Highway Structures
Aug 2005
1.1.1
BD 7/01
Weathering Steel for Highway Structures
Nov 2001
2.3.8
BD 9/81
Implementation of BS 5400: Part 10: 1980 Code of

Practice of Fatigue
Dec 1981
1.3
BD 10/97
Design of Highway Structures in Areas of Mining

Subsidence
May 1997
1.3.14
BD 12/01
Design of Corrugated Steel Buried Structures with

Spans Greater than 0.9 metres and up to 8 metres
Nov 2001
2.2.6
BD 13/06
Design of Steel Bridges. Use of BS 5400-3: 2000
May 2006
1.3.14
BD 15/92
General Principles for the Design and

Construction of Bridges. Use of BS 5400: Part 1:
1998
Dec 1992
1.3.2
BD 16/82
Design of Composite Bridges. Use of BS 5400:

Part 5: 1979
Nov 1982
1.3
Amendment No. 1
Dec 1987
BD 20/92
Bridge Bearings. Use of BD 5400: Part 9: 1983
Oct 1992
2.3.1
BD 21/01
The Assessment
Structures
and
May 2001
3.4.3
BD 24/92
Design of Concrete Bridges.

Part 4: 1990
Use of BS 5400:
Nov 1992
1.3.1
BA 26/04
Design of Lighting Columns
Nov 2004
2.2.1
BD 27/86
Materials for the Repair of Concrete Highway

Structures
Nov 1986
3.3
BD 28/87
Early Thermal Cracking of Concrete
Jul 1987
1.3
Amendment No. 1
Aug 1989
BD 29/04
Design Criteria for Footbridges
Aug 2004
2.2.8
BD 30/87
Backfilled Retaining Walls and Bridge Abutments
Aug 1987
2.1
BD 31/01
The Design of Buried Concrete Box and Portal

Frame Structures
Nov 2001
2.2.12
BD 33/94
Expansion Joints for Use in Highway Bridge

Decks
Nov 1994
2.3.6
BD 34/90

Strengthening Programme for Highway Structures
Sep 1990
3.4
BD 35/06
Quality Assurance Scheme for Paints and Similar

Protective Coatings
May 2006
2.4.1
BD 36/92
Evaluation of Maintenance Costs in comparing

Alternative Designs for Highway Structures
Aug 1992
1.2.1
BD 37/01
Loads for Highway Bridges
Aug 2001
1.3.14
BD 41/97
Reinforced Clay Brickwork Retaining Walls of
May 1997
2.1.1
of
Highway
Bridges
Pocket Type and Grouted Cavity type construction
Document
Reference
Title
Date of
Issue
Decimal
Reference
BD 42/00
Design of Embedded Retaining Walls and Bridge

Abutments
May 2000
2.1.2
BD 43/03
The impregnation of Reinforced and Prestressed

Concrete Highway Structures using Hydrophobic
Pore-Lining Impregnations
Feb 2003
2.4.2
BD 44/95
The Assessment of Concrete Highway Bridges

and Structures
Jan 1995
3.4.14
BD 45/93
Identification Marking of Highway Structures
Aug 1993
3.1.1
BD 46/92

Strengthening Programme for Highway Structures.
Aug 1992
3.4.1
[Stage 2 Modern Short Span Bridges]

BD 47/99
Waterproofing and surfacing of concrete bridge

decks
Aug 1999
2.3.4
BD 48/93
The Assessment and Strengthening of Highway

Bridge Supports
Jun 1993
3.4.7
BD 49/01
Design Rules for Aerodynamic Effects on Bridges
May 2001
1.3.3
BD 50/92

Strengthening Programme for Highway Structures
Stage 3 Long Span Bridges
Dec 1992
3.4.2
BD 51/98
Portal and Cantilever Sign/Signal Gantries
May 1998
2.2.4
BD 52/93
The Design of Highway Bridge Parapets
Apr 1993
2.3.3
BD 53/95
Inspection and Records for Road Tunnels
Jul 1995
3.1.6
BD 54/93
Post-tensioned Concrete Bridges
Apr 1993
3.1.2
Prioritisation of Special Inspections.
BD 56/96
The Assessment of Steel Highway Bridges and

Structures
Nov 1996
3.4.11
BD 57/01
Design for durability
Aug 2001
1.3.7
BD 58/94
The Design of Concrete Highway Bridges and

Structures
with
External
and
Unbonded
Prestressing Design of Highway Bridges for
Vehicle Collision
Nov 1994
1.3.9
BD 60/04
Design of Highway Bridges for Vehicle Collision

Loads
May 200?
1.3.5
BD 61/96
The Assessment of Composite Highway Bridges
Nov 1996
3.4.16
BD 62/07
As Built, Operational and Maintenance Records

for Highway Structures
Feb 2007
3.2.1
BD 63/07
Inspection of Highway Structures
Feb 2007
3.1.4
BD 65/97
Design criteria for Collision Protector Beams
Feb 1997
2.2.5
BD 67/96
Enclosures of Bridges
Aug 1996
2.2.7
BD 68/97
Crib Retaining Walls
Feb 1997
2.1.3
Document
Reference
Title
Date of
Issue
Decimal
Reference
BD 70/03
Strengthening Reinforced Soils and Other Fills for

Retaining Walls and Bridge Abutments Use of
BS8006: 1995, incorporating Amendment No. 1
(Issue 2 March 1999).
May 2003
2.1.5
BD 74/00
Foundations
May 2000
2.1.8
BD 78/99
Design of Road Tunnels
Aug 1999
2.2.9
BD 81/02
Use of Compressive Membrane Actions in Bridge

Decks
May 2007
2.4.20
Correction 2
BD 82/00
Design of Buried Rigid Pipes
Aug 2000
2.2.10
BD 83/01
The Design of Highway Bridge Parapets
Apr 1993
2.3.3
BD 84/02
Strengthening of Concrete Bridge Supports

Vehicle Impact Using Fibre Reinforced Polymers
Aug 2002
1.3.16
BD 86/04
The Assessment of Highway Bridges and

Structures for the Effects of Special Types General
Orders (STGO) and Special Order (SO) Vehicles
Nov 2004
3.4.19
BD 87/05
Maintenance Painting of Steelwork
May 2005
3.2.2
BD 88/05
Design of Cantilever Masts for Traffic Signals

and/or Speed Cameras
May 2005
2.2.13
BD 89/03
The Conservation of Highway Structures
Nov 2003
3.2.4
BD 90/05
Design of FRP Bridges and Highway Structures
May 2005
1.3.17
BD 91/04
Unreinforced Masonry Arch Bridges
Nov 2004
2.2.14
BD 94/07
Design of Minor Structures
Feb 2007
2.2.1
BD 95/07
Treatment of existing structures on Highway

Widening Schemes
Aug 2007
1.2.3
Bridges and Structures, Technical Memoranda (BE Series) from DMRB

Document
Reference
Title
Date of
Issue
Decimal
Reference
BE 13
Fatigue Risk in Bailey Bridges
Apr 1968
3.4
BE 23
Shear Key Decks
Nov 1970
1.3
Amendment No. 1 to Annex
June 1971
BE 5/75
Rules for the Design and Use of Freyssinet

Concrete Hinges in Highway Structures
Mar 1975
1.3
BE 7/04
Departmental Standard (Interim)
Aug 2004
2.2
Motorway Sign/Signal Gantries

Traffic Engineering and Control, Standards (TD Series) from DMRB

Document
Reference
TD 9/93
Title
Date of
Issue
Decimal
Reference
Highway Link Design
Jun 1993
6.1.1
Amendment No. 1
Feb 2002
TD 19/06
Requirement for Road Restraint Systems
Aug 2006
2.2.8
TD 27/05
Cross Sections and Headroom
Feb 2005
6.1.2
TD 36/93
Subways for pedestrians and cyclists, layout and

dimensions
Jul 1993
6.3.1
Date of
Issue
Decimal
Reference
Highway, Advice Notes (HA Series) from DMRB

Document
Reference
HA 66/95
Title
Environmental Barriers Technical Requirements
Sep 1995
10.5.2
Highways, Standards (HD Series) from DMRB

Document
Reference
Title
Date of
Issue
Decimal
Reference
HD 22/02
Managing Geotechnical Risk
May 2002
APPENDIX C
EXTRACT OF RESULTS FROM GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION

(To be supplied in a separate Addendum)
4.1.2

Highways Retaining Wall AIP

Diunggah oleh

Informasi Dokumen

Deskripsi Asli:

Hak Cipta

Format Tersedia

Bagikan dokumen Ini

Bagikan atau Tanam Dokumen

Opsi Berbagi

Apakah menurut Anda dokumen ini bermanfaat?

Apakah konten ini tidak pantas?

Hak Cipta:

Format Tersedia

Highways Retaining Wall AIP

Diunggah oleh

Hak Cipta:

Format Tersedia

CONTROL SHEET

Issue and Approval Schedule:

This report has been prepared in accordance with procedure OP/P03 of W A

Engineering/Highways Retaining Wall AIP

Permitted Traffic Speed

Existing Weight Restriction

Engineering/Highways Retaining Wall AIP

Types of Road Restraint Systems

Proposed Arrangements for Maintenance and Inspection

Sustainability Issues Considered. Materials and Finishes

Capping beam, concrete fascia

Chloride Class XD2

Capping beam, concrete fascia

Engineering/Highways Retaining Wall AIP

Chloride Class XD3

Carbonation Class XC3

Freeze Thaw Attack Class XF2

Capping beam, concrete fascia

Engineering/Highways Retaining Wall AIP

Vertical exposed surfaces of capping beam

Featured finish (to be agreed)

Buried top surface

Exposed top surface

All buried concrete surfaces to be waterproofed

Risks and Hazards Considered

Problems of collapse of the trench temporary sheet piles are

Problems of demolition of the existing footing.

Air pollution control the dust in air during construction.

Construction adjacent to live carriageway temporary local lane

Fall from height designed out with the use of vehicle/pedestrian

Unsuitable ground conditions a geotechnical investigation is being

In services hazards errant vehicles to be contained by adjacent road

Estimated Cost of Proposed Structure together with other Structural

The adjacent carriageway has to be kept open to traffic during the

Engineering/Highways Retaining Wall AIP

There will be less excavation involved compared to the reinforced

There will be less environmental impact from the construction on the

Negates any requirement for temporary works to retain the adjacent

The overall construction time will be shorter.

Proposed Arrangements for Construction

Live Loading, Headroom

Loading relating to normal traffic under AW Regulations and

Engineering/Highways Retaining Wall AIP

Full HA live load surcharge of 10 kN/m in accordance with

Loading Relating to General Order Traffic under STGO

Footway or Footbridge Live Loading

Engineering/Highways Retaining Wall AIP

Loading relating to Special Order Traffic, Provision for

Any Special Loading not covered Above

Heavy or High Load Route Requirements and Arrangements

Minimum Headroom Provided

Authorities Consulted and Any Special Conditions Required

List of Relevant Documents from the TAS

Additional Relevant Standards

Engineering/Highways Retaining Wall AIP

BS EN 206-1 Concrete Part 1 Specification, performance

Proposed Departures from Standards given in 4.2 and 4.2.1

Proposed Methods of Dealing with aspects not covered by

Methods of Analysis Proposed for Superstructure, Substructure and

Engineering/Highways Retaining Wall AIP

The retaining wall will be analysed statically by hand on a metre strip

Description and Diagram of Idealised Structure to be used for

Assumptions intended for calculation of structural element stiffness