I. I NTRODUCTION
DC-DC converter must provide a regulated DC output
voltage even when varying load or the input voltage
varies. The two most common closed-loop control methods
for PWM DC-DC converters are the voltage-mode control
and the current-mode control. An important advantage of the
voltage-mode control is its simple hardware implementation
and flexibility [1]-[3].
Among the control methods of DC-DC converters, the
hysteretic control is very simple for hardware implementation.
However, the hysteretic control induces a variable frequency
operation of the power switches.
Fig. 1.
1057
dv0
dt
(1)
1
RC
v0
where the state variables are the inductance currents (iL ) and
capacitance voltages (v0 ).
When the switch is OF F the system is also linear and the
state-space equations are given by:
diL
= vL0
dt
(2)
v0
dv0
= iCL RC
dt
x1
iL
The choice of the state vector x =
=
allows
x2
v0
the state-space representation for mode 1 by:
x 1 = A1 x + B1 u
(3)
v0 = C1 x
Where:
A1 =
vin
1
RC
, B1 =
1
L
, C1 =
and u =
A2 =
u = vin .
v0 (v0 vin )
R
vin
0
C1
1
L
1
RC
, B2 =
0
0
, C2 =
(8)
(9)
(4)
and
The state-space averaging method replaces the stateequations by a single state-space description which represents
approximately the behaviour of the circuit across the whole
period. From the state-space representation of mode 1 (ON
mode) and mode 2 (OF F mode) described by (3) and (4) the
averaged state-space representation of buck-boost converter
system is obtained and represented by the following equations:
x = [dA1 + (1 d)A2 ]x + [dB1 + (1 d)B2 ]vin
(5)
v0 = [dC1 + (1 d)C2 ]x
d takes 1 for the on state of the switcher and 0 for the off
state.
1d
d
L
L
x =
vin
x+
1
0
1d
RC
(6)
C
v0 = 0 1 x
deq =
(10)
The next step is to design the control input so that the state
trajectories are driven and attracted toward the sliding surface
and then remain sliding on it for all subsequent time. Let us
consider the positive definite Lyapunov function V defined as
follows:
V =
1 2
S
2
(11)
(12)
(13)
1058
Fig. 4.
Output singletons
TABLE I
RULE BASE OF THE PROPOSED FSMC
P
Z
N
S
N
Z
NM
NB
Z
PM
Z
NM
P
PB
PM
Z
(14)
Fig. 5. Block diagram of the proposed fuzzy sliding mode control Buck
converter
V. S IMULATION RESULTS
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
1059
Parameters
Values
C
L
R
Switching Frequency
100.106 F
20.103 H
20
30.103 Hz
Fig. 8. Control signal of the buck boost converter by application of the SMC
Fig. 9.
FSMC
Fig. 10.
Fig. 11. Robustness test of the FSMC for the variation of the load current
from 1.6A to 2.45A
1060
Fig. 12.
Fig. 16. Robustness test of the FSMC for the variation of the input voltage
from 30V to 15V
Fig. 13. Robustness test of the FSMC for the variation of the input voltage
from 15V to 10V
Fig. 14. Evolution of the load current when the input voltage changes from
15V to 10V
Fig. 15.
Fig. 17. Evolution of the load current when t the input voltage changes from
30V to 15V
Fig. 18.
Fig. 19. Robustness test of the FSMC for the variation of the input voltage
from 15V to 25V
1061
Fig. 20. Evolution of the load current when the input voltage changes from
15V to 25V
Kamel Ben Saad Was born in 1976 in Tunis, Tunisia. He graduated in 2000
from Ecole Nationale dIngnieurs (ENIT). He received the master degree also
from ENIT in 2001. He received the PhD degree in Electrical Engineering
in 2005 from Ecole Centrale de Lille and Ecole Nationale dIngnieurs de
Tunis. He is currently Matre-Assistant (Assistant Professor) at the ENIT. His
research interests are in the area of machines, classical and intelligent, control.
VI. C ONCLUSION
In this paper, we propose a fuzzy sliding mode control for
improving the robustness and the dynamical performances of
a buck boost DC-DC. The proposed fuzzy controller design
has as inputs the sliding surface and its variation. It defines
the control signal to satisfy the stability and the attraction
condition of the sliding surface. The simulation results show
that the proposed controller overcomes the chattering problem.
Moreover, it is proven that the proposed controller is robust
for the case of the desired output currents variation and input
voltage variations.
R EFERENCES
[1] M. H. Rashid, Power electronics handbook, 2nd ed. Academic Press,
1998.
[2] R.D. Middlebrook and S. Cuk, A General Unified Approach to Modelling
Switching Power Stages, IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference
Rec., pp. 18-34, 1976.
[3] M. Ahmed, M. Kuisma, K. Tolsa and P. Silventoinen, Standard procedure
for modelling the basic three converters (Buck, Boost, and Buck-boost)
with PID algorithm applied, Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Electrical Apparatus and Technologies (SIELA), Plovdive, May
2003.
[4] H. ElFadil, F. Giri and H. Ouadi, Reducing Chattering Phenomenon in
Sliding Mode Control of Buck-Boost Power Converters, IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics, 2008.
[5] S.C. Tan, Y.M. Lai and C.K. Tse, A fixed frequency pulse width modulation based quasi sliding mode controller for buck converter, IEEE
Transactions on Power Electronics, Vol. 20, No. 6, pp. 1379-1392,
November 2005.
[6] S.C. Tan, Y.M. Lai and C.K. Tse, A unified approach to the design of
PWM based sliding mode voltage controllers for basic DC-DC converters
in continuous conduction mode, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and
Systems I, Vol. 53, No. 8, pp.1816-1827, August 2006.
[7] C.K. Tse and K.M. Adams, Quasi-linear analysis and control of DC-DC
converters, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, Vol. 7 No. 2, pp.
315-323, April 1992.
[8] X.F. Zhong, G.J. Ye, N.H. Chen and J.L. Jiang, Study on sliding-mode
control in three-level converters, The 4th International Power Electronics
and Motion Control Conference, 2004. IPEMC 2004, Vol 3, Issue 2, pp.
1105 - 1110, August 2004.
[9] V.M. Nguyen and C.Q. Lee, Indirect implementations of sliding-mode
control law in buck-type converters, Proceedings of the IEEE Applied
Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC), Vol.1, pp.111115, March 1996.
[10] A. Kandel and L. Gideon, Fuzzy control systems, CRC Press. New York,
2000.
[11] M.K. Passino, Fuzzy control, Addison-Wesley. London, 2000.
1062