16, 2016
Copyright 2016 Elsevier Inc.
Printed in the USA. All rights reserved
0736-4679/$ - see front matter
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2015.11.034
Brief
Reports
TRACHEAL TUBE POSITION SHIFT DURING INFANT RESUSCITATION BY CHEST
COMPRESSION: A SIMULATION COMPARISON BY FIXATION METHOD AND WITH
OR WITHOUT CUFF
Takeshi Ueno, MD, Nobuyasu Komasawa, MD, PHD, Nozomi Majima, MD, PHD, Ryosuke Mihara, MD, and
Toshiaki Minami, MD, PHD
Department of Anesthesiology, Osaka Medical College, Osaka, Japan
Reprint Address: Nobuyasu Komasawa, MD, PHD, Department of Anesthesiology, Osaka Medical College, 2-7 Daigaku-machi, Takatsuki,
Osaka 569-8686, Japan
INTRODUCTION
Asphyxial cardiac arrest is more common than ventricular
fibrillation cardiac arrest in infants and children, and
definite tracheal intubation is extremely important in
infant resuscitation (1,2). Once tracheal intubation is
completed, continuous chest compression is possible
because there is definite separation and protection of the
trachea from the esophagus and stomach and the quality
of chest compressions can be measured by assessing
end-tidal CO2 values (3). Endotracheal tube placement
during resuscitation is important for definite tracheal protection, especially in infants and children. After successful
endotracheal intubation, the infant endotracheal tube must
be secured to prevent movement of the tube that can result
in extubation (4). Accidental extubation due to endotracheal tube displacement results in severe complications.
Unplanned infant extubation has been reported
frequently in the context of critical care, but very little
T. Ueno et al.
research has examined its frequency of this in the emergency department or in the context of resuscitation
(46). Activities that involve patient movement are
known to increase the risk of unintentional extubation,
and it seems likely that patients who are intubated
during chest compression will exhibit a high risk of
accidental extubation.
Tracheal tube displacement leading to accidental
extubation during infant resuscitation is a rare event, but
can lead to severe complications. Therefore, the present
study evaluated tracheal tube displacement, as it is affected
by various fixation methods in a manikin and autochest
compression machine simulation. Specifically, we
compared adhesive extensive tape, nonextensive tape,
and tube holder fixation, with no fixation set as a control.
We hypothesized that the infant tracheal tube would
shift with continuous chest compression, and that the fixation method would affect this shift. As a clinical evaluation of such fixation during resuscitation would be
unethical, we decided to use the infant manikin to
compare fixation methods.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The advanced life support (ALS) Baby manikin (Laerdal, Stavanger, Norway), which is designed to represent
a 3-month-old infant (11 lb), was used for tracheal tube
placement and continuous chest compression (7,8). The
cuffed internal diameter of the tracheal tube
(Mallinkrodt; Covidien, MA, USA) was 3.5 mm. We
placed the tracheal tube at 10 cm from the gum ridge in
the baby manikin. The manikin or tracheal tube was
well prepared with attached lubricant before the study.
For the first experiment, cuff pressure was adjusted to
15, 20, and 25 cmH2O. Cuff pressure adjustments were
performed with an automated cuff pressure controller
(Mallinckrodt Pressure Control; Covidien, Dublin,
Ireland), which perform automated calibration and
contains accuracy down to 1 decimal place, according to
the manufacturer. After tracheal tube placement and cuff
pressure adjustment, the following four fixation methods
were compared: 1) no fixation; 2) adhesive nonextensive
tape (Durapore; 3M, St Paul, MN); 3) adhesive
extensive tape (Multipore; 3M); and 4) pediatric tube
holder (Thomas Tube Holder; Laerdal, Stavanger,
Norway) (Figure 1AD).
Next, 5 min of continuous chest compression was performed by two-thumb method according to the 2010
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines (2). After
5 min of chest compressions, the incidence of accidental
extubation and the extent of tube shift from gum ridge to
the point of displacement were measured with the same
ruler, which contains scale down to 1 decimal millimeter.
Trials were performed five times in each setting.
Figure 1. Fixation methods. (A) No fixation of the tracheal tube. (B) Tube fixation by Durapore adhesive nonextensive tape. (C)
Tube fixation by Multipore adhesive extensive tape. (D) Thomas Tube Holder.
DISCUSSION
Airway management is considered an essential element
for both in-hospital and out-of-hospital infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) (9,10). Current European
Resuscitation Council Guidelines for pediatric
resuscitation emphasize the importance of airway
management with as few interruptions as possible (2).
After confirmation of infant tracheal tube placement,
tracheal tube fixation is highly critical because even a
small tracheal tube shift can result in accidental extubation or one-lung ventilation. In adult studies, securing
the tracheal tube during the use of a tube holder, or
wire anchoring the tube to the oral cavity, can reduce
T. Ueno et al.
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
15cmH2O
20cmH2O
0.4
25cmH2O
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
No fixation
Durapore
Multipore
Tube Holder
Figure 2. Tracheal tube movement by infant chest compression (mean standard deviation) at initial cuff pressure at 15,
20, and 25 cmH2O. Durapore, Durapore adhesive nonextensive tape; Multipore, Multipore adhesive extensive tape;
Tube holder, Thomas Tube Holder. Differences were
analyzed by two-way analysis of variance. NS, no significant
difference; *p < 0.05 compared with the other three simulations; #p < 0.05 compared with no fixation.
REFERENCES
1. Monsieurs KG, Nolan JP, Bossaert LL, et al. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015: Section 1. Executive summary. Resuscitation 2015;95:180.
5
10. Suominen P, Olkkola KT, Voipio V, Korpela R, Palo R, Rasanen J.
Utstein style reporting of in-hospital paediatric cardiopulmonary
resuscitation. Resuscitation 2000;45:1725.
11. Chiang AA, Lee KC, Lee JC, Wei CH. Effectiveness of a continuous
quality improvement program aiming to reduce unplanned extubation: a prospective study. Intensive Care Med 1996;22:126971.
12. Gardner A, Hughes D, Cook R, Henson R, Osborne S, Gardner G.
Best practice in stabilisation of oral endotracheal tubes: a systematic
review. Aust Crit Care 2005;18:158. 160165.
13. Eason J, Tayler D, Cottam S, et al. Manual chest compression for
total bronchospasm. Lancet 1991;337:366.
14. Al-Metwalli RR, Mowafi HA, Ismail SA. Gentle chest compression
relieves extubation laryngospasm in children. J Anesth 2010;24:
8547.
15. Owen R, Castle N, Hann H, Reeves D, Naidoo R, Naidoo S. Extubation force: a comparison of adhesive tape, non-adhesive tape and
a commercial endotracheal tube holder. Resuscitation 2009;80:
1296300.
16. Carlson J, Mayrose J, Krause R, Jehle D. Extubation force: tape
versus endotracheal tube holders. Ann Emerg Med 2007;50:
68691.
17. Komasawa N, Ueki R, Itani M, Nishi S, Minami T. Validation of
Pentax-AWS Airwayscope utility for intubation device during cardiopulmonary resuscitation on the ground. J Anesth 2010;24:5826.
18. Komasawa N, Fujiwara S, Miyazaki S, Soen M, Minami T. Comparison of fluid leakage from four different cuffed pediatric endotracheal tubes using a pediatric airway simulation model. Pediatr Int
2014;56:6346.
T. Ueno et al.
ARTICLE SUMMARY
1. Why is this topic important?
Tracheal tube placement during infant resuscitation is
essential for definite airway protection. Accidental extubation due to tracheal tube displacement is a rare event,
but it results in severe complications, especially in infants.
2. What does this study attempt to show?
The present study evaluated infant tracheal tube shift
with continuous chest compression and how tracheal
tube displacement is affected by tape vs. tube holder fixation using a manikin. We also hypothesized the cuff affects the infant tracheal tube shift and evaluated the
displacement with or without cuff.
3. What are the key findings?
Relative to no fixation, tracheal tube shift was significantly less in the Durapore, Multipore, and tube holder
groups (p < 0.05) at all initial cuff settings. Of the three
fixation methods, the tube holder showed significantly
less shift (p < 0.05) relative to tape regardless of the initial
cuff pressure. The positional shift after chest compressions was significantly larger in the trials with cuff than
in those without cuff.
4. How is patient care impacted?
Tube holder fixation is effective for tracheal tube fixation during infant chest compression. The tube cuff can
contribute to the positional shift of the tube during infant
chest compression.