0 penilaian0% menganggap dokumen ini bermanfaat (0 suara)
12 tayangan2 halaman
CNIL and its European counterparts have united in an unprecedented attack on the way the search giant collects information on its users. Last year, in a letter to Google's co-founder and chief executive, the regulators found shortcomings in the search engine giant's privacy regime. The eventual fine, if indeed there is a fine, would barely make a difference to the policy that covers the majority of our company, whose revenues hit $50bn last year.
CNIL and its European counterparts have united in an unprecedented attack on the way the search giant collects information on its users. Last year, in a letter to Google's co-founder and chief executive, the regulators found shortcomings in the search engine giant's privacy regime. The eventual fine, if indeed there is a fine, would barely make a difference to the policy that covers the majority of our company, whose revenues hit $50bn last year.
CNIL and its European counterparts have united in an unprecedented attack on the way the search giant collects information on its users. Last year, in a letter to Google's co-founder and chief executive, the regulators found shortcomings in the search engine giant's privacy regime. The eventual fine, if indeed there is a fine, would barely make a difference to the policy that covers the majority of our company, whose revenues hit $50bn last year.
Privacy watchdogs have united in an unprecedented attack on the way the search giant collects information on its users Nikhil Kumar Wednesday, 3 April 2013 That Google likes to keep things simple is
apparent from its spartan home page: a logo, a
text box for search queries, two buttons to process queries, and an unobtrusive strip of links 5 to the internet behemoths email, maps and other services along the top. Links along the
bottom connect you to the company, and up in the top right-hand corner theres a button to sign
in to your Google account. 10
16
21
26
30
35
which found shortcomings in the search engine
giants privacy regime. Last year, in a letter to
Larry Page, Googles co-founder and chief executive, and signed by CNIL and its European 40 counterparts, the regulators said: Google empowers itself to collect vast amounts of
personal data about internet users, but Google has not demonstrated that this collection was
proportionate to the purposes for which they are processed. Moreover, Google did not set It was in this minimalist spirit that Google decided 46 any limits to the combination of data nor to overhaul its privacy policies last year. In a post provide clear and comprehensive tools
on the companys official blog in January last year allowing its users to control it. its head of privacy, Alma Whitten, explained that despite trimming out policies in 2010, we still What is the risk for the search engine, which have more than 70 (yes, you read right 70) has been working with regulators to resolve 51 privacy documents covering all of our different the concerns over the last year? Financially, it products. This approach is somewhat hardly merits a mention. While the joint
announcement was billed as a showdown, complicated. the eventual fine, if indeed there is a fine, So Google said it was rolling out a new main 55 would barely make a difference to the policy that covers the majority of our company, whose revenues hit $50bn last year. products.What does this mean in practice? In CNIL, for example, has the right to impose a short, well treat you as a single user across all fine of up to 300,000 or what Google earns
our products, which will mean a simpler, more in a few minutes. Any penalties, then, are intuitive Google experience, Ms Whitten wrote. unlikely to force Google cut back on the free 60 lunches it offers its employees. Theres that word simple again. But this week, regulators from no fewer than six European More damaging for the business, which countries (Britain, Germany, France, Italy, Spain maintains that its privacy policy respects and the Netherlands) said they werent sure that European law and allows us to create simpler, the policy was simple enough. (Ms Whitten, more effective services, would be the incidentally, stepped down from her post just 65 negative publicity, and the possible concerns it ahead of the European announcement, in what creates in users minds. Only last month, the
has been described, simply, as an unrelated company agreed to cough up $7m to settle a move.) multi-state US investigation into the
interception of private information as its The unprecedented joint action came after an Google Maps vehicles drove around gathering 70 investigation led by the French watchdog CNIL, images for its Street View service. The
company blamed a rogue engineer, and did not
admit any wrongdoing in the matter.
Worries, meanwhile, are also growing about the
possible privacy implications of another Google product, one that hasnt even been released yet.
75
81
85
91
In grand Google tradition, the Google Glass is a
simple gadget: a hands-free device shaped like a pair of spectacles. A visor in the wearers line of sight displays the interface. Earlier this year, Googles co-founder Sergey Brin was spotted on the New York subway wearing a prototype. The device will respond to voice commands, and comes equipped with a camera, meaning that you can be sitting in a coffee shop in downtown Mountain View, near the search engines headquarters, say, wearing a Google Glass, looking as if youre doing nothing more than sipping a skinny cappuccino when you are, in fact, videoing your surroundings. Or so it seems after viewing the snippets of information that the company has released about the project.
Rivals, meanwhile, are swinging into action as the
headlines add up, with Microsoft running an ad
campaign based on the privacy worries surrounding Google. The adverts, which began 96 airing before the European announcement, are accompanied by a website (www.scroogled.com)
which is meant to lure users to Microsofts Outlook email service by highlighting what the 100 campaign says are problems with the way Google treats the privacy of GMail users. It highlights the
concerns and not-so-subtly asks: Have you been Scroogled?