Chromium Trioxide
Automotive Industry
Challenges
27 March 2014
Dr. Wolfgang Marquardt
BMW Group
REACH
Over 32 billion
in R&D spending,
largest private
investor
92 billion
of net trade
contribution
and employment
12.9 million direct and indirect jobs
385 billion
of tax revenues
(EU 14)
Topics
Introduction: Automotive Industry and REACH
Authorisation
Importance of CrO3 in the Automotive Industry
Strategic Aspects on Chrome plating from
2017 onwards
Summary
Recommendation: Strategic Aspects on Timing
and Submission
CrO3/Cr(VI) in cars?
End-of-Life Vehicles (ELV) Directive
(2000/53/EC)
Ban of Cr(VI) since 2003
No potential risk in passenger cars with Cr(VI)
Example: Fuel-Injection-Technology
Current Product Situation
No alternatives for use of chromium
trioxide known, for comparable
function and life-endurance
No Cr(VI) in the end product
Current Situation on Worker Safety and Environment
Electro-plating sites with high standards
Skilled workers
Emission-free production
Conflict with European goal on CO2-Emissions
Hard-chrome plating is irreplaceable to meet current and
future CO2 emission
targets
Strategic Aspects
Mingle-Mangle from Supply chain
an unlimited authorisation for chromium
trioxide is guaranteed
we will not apply for authorisation because an
alternative is available for our specific use
we will relocate our production outside of
Europe
a technical alternative to chromium trioxide is
unknown
slowly, ECHA realises that they made a
mistake
What is fact, what is fiction?
Current Facts
In REACH Annex XIV since April 2013
Strategic Aspects
5 Ways to go?
Now
2017
2018
Strategic Aspects
5 Ways to go?
Change the law?
Now
2017
2018
Strategic Aspects
5 Ways to go?
Change the law?
Non-EU Production?
Now
2017
2018
Non-EU Production?
Relocation of production sites
outside the EU can be foreseen
Unproblematic under REACH because
imported chrome-plated parts without Cr(VI)
Critical for EU labour market (once dislocated
always dislocated)
Loss of competence in the EU
The automotive industry acts global, but
Additional logistics
Level of workers safety the same in other
countries?
Critical step from a sustainable perspective
An early authorisation would send a signal
Strategic Aspects
5 Ways to go?
Change the law?
Non-EU Production?
Now
On stock production?
2017
2018
On stock production?
Production of chrome plated parts on stock
before sunset date in 2017
High storage cost and low resource efficiency
Very limited (some models, some spare parts)
Only temporary
Not a solution for spare parts issue (>12
years spare part guarantee):
Unlike ELV and other directives, REACH does
not offer the repair-as-produced-principle
(yet)
Strategic Aspects
5 Ways to go?
Change the law?
Non-EU Production?
Now
On stock production?
Substitution?
2017
2018
Substitution?
Aim of REACH Annex XIV is Substitution
Where to start? Which parts?
Average of 500,000 parts to search
No search for CAS-No CrO3
Instead search via complex supply chain with
1,500 to 4,500 suppliers (Tier 1)
Substitution?
Substitution?
Substitution?
Strategic Aspects
5 Ways to go?
Change the law?
Non-EU Production?
Now
On stock production?
Substitution?
Authorisation?
2017
2018
Authorisation?
The OEMs cannot apply for CrO3 authorisation
Dependent on authorisation submission by
supply chain
Expected authorisation dossiers with
automotive applications
CTAC Consortium
VECCO e.V.
Planning reliability crucial for strategy
Express request to consortia/applicants: early
submission
Express request to authorities: fast processing
Strategic decisions at OEMs required in 2014
Authorisation?
Authorisation crucial: sunset date vs life time
Example car model 1 (Start of Production
2018)
2013 to 2017 Sunset
Type
approval
Period to introduce changes
> 24 years from concept to recycling
Use of Alternative only after validation and under large scale production
Authorisation?
Authorisation crucial: sunset date vs life time
Example car model 2 (Start of Production
2013)
2013 to 2017 Sunset
Type
approval
Period to introduce changes
> 24 years from concept to recycling
Gain planning certainty with early authorisation and long review periods
Authorisation?
Authorisation crucial: sunset date vs life time
Example car model 3 (Start of Production
2003)
2013 to 2017 Sunset
Type
approval
Period to introduce changes
> 24 years from concept to recycling
Another Example:
Recast of the Pyrotechnic articles directive (2013/29/EC) :
59) Pyrotechnic articles for vehicles are designed for vehicle life cycles and therefore
require special transitional arrangements. It is necessary for such a pyrotechnic article to
comply with the requirements of the law applicable at the time it is first made available on
the market and for the period of the lifetime of the vehicle in which it is installed.
Strategic Aspects
5 Ways to go?
Change the law?
Non-EU Production?
Now
On stock production?
Substitution?
Authorisation?
2017
2018
Summary
Authorisation is essential
Planning reliability increases by an early
authorisation
Long lead time for substitution and required
large scale production and available
capacities in Europe for all OEMs asks for
long review periods
Substitution of CrO3
Aim should be use of sustainable products
that are environmentally safe and will not
become the next SVHC-Generation
The automotive life-time and complexity
requires appropriate time for substitution
http://www.acea.be/reach/
Available languages (Released: 05/12)
English
German
Chinese
Japanese
French
Korean
Thank you!