How will we build an artificial human brain?

1 of 4

http://io9.com/5906945/how-will-we-build-an-artificial-human-brain

TOP STORIES

LATEST STORIES

SATURDAY, MAR 9, 2013

WE COME FROM THE FUTURE

EVIL DEAD
4,575
First Evil Dead reviews paint
remake as a psychotic gorefest
that will make fans of the original
laugh
IO9 BACKGROUNDER

How will we build an

artificial human brain?
There's an ongoing debate among
neuroscientists, cognitive scientists, and
even philosophers as to whether or not we
could ever construct or reverse engineer the
human brain. Some suggest it's not
possible, others argue about the best way to
do it, and still others have already begun
working on it.

BY GEORGE DVORSKY

MAY 2, 2012 8:05 AM

FOLLOW IO9.COM

Regardless, it's fair to say that ongoing breakthroughs in brain science are steadily paving the
way to the day when an artificial brain can be constructed from scratch. And if we assume
that cognitive functionalism holds true as a theory the idea that our brains are a kind of
computer there are two very promising approaches worth pursuing.
Interestingly, the two approaches come from two relatively different disciplines: cognitive
science and neuroscience. One side wants to build a brain with code, while the other wants to
recreate all the brain's important functions by emulating it on a computer. It's anyone's guess
at this point in time as to who will succeed and get there first, if either of them.
Before we take a deeper look into these two approaches, however, it's worth reviewing what
our friend Alan Turing had to say about brains.

The Church-Turing Hypothesis

Given that scientists are looking to model the human brain in digital substrate (i.e. a
computer), they're having to work in accordance to a rather fundamental assumption:
computational functionalism. This goes back to the Church-Turing thesis which states that a
Turing machine can emulate any other Turing machine. Essentially, this means that every
physically computable function can be computed by a Turing machine. And if brain activity is
regarded as a function that is physically computed by brains, then it should be possible to
compute it on a Turing machine, namely a computer.
So, if you believe that there's something mystical or vital about human cognition you're
probably not going to put too much credence into these two approaches.
Or, if you believe that there's something inherently unique about intelligence that can't be
translated into the digital realm, you've got your work cut out for you to explain what that is
exactly keeping in mind that any informational process is computational, including those
brought about by electrical and chemical reactions. Minds are what brains do, so it's not too
implausible to suggest that minds are what computers can do, too.

Rules-based artificial intelligence

One very promising strategy for building brains is the rules-based approach. The basic idea is

MEDICINE
21,692
Nanoparticles Made From Bee
Venom Can Kill HIV
VIKINGS
1,688
Heres Why You Should Start
Watching Vikings Right Now
TRAILER FRENZY
4,468
Kirk gets a dose of fatherly love in
the latest action-packed Star Trek
Into Darkness trailer
ANIMAL BEHAVIOR
727
Mighty mouse attacks venomous
snake to free its fellow mouse
GAME OF THRONES
2,622
Beautiful black-and-white
illustrations put a gothic spin on
Game of Thrones
MOVIE REVIEW
3,227
Oz the Great and Powerful Should
Have Been a B-Movie
SUPERLIST
6,799
6 Things From the Walking Dead
Comic That We Need to See on TV
EARTH SCIENCE
5,035
Russian scientists say theyve
found unclassified life in
Antarctic Lake
SPACE
5,219
The Earths most powerful
telescope goes online next week
THIS IS AWESOME
2,177
An astoundingly accurate 90s style
Walking Dead introduction
SPACE
1,166
NASAs Guide to Viewing the
Comet PANSTARRS this Month
WRECK-IT RALPH
391
Wacky Wreck-It Ralph
mockumentary tracks the fall and
rise of the Fix-It Felix Jr. world
champion

3/9/2013 11:42 PM

How will we build an artificial human brain?

2 of 4

http://io9.com/5906945/how-will-we-build-an-artificial-human-brain

that scientists don't need to mimic the human brain in its entirety. Instead, they just have to
figure out how the "software" parts of the brain work; they need to figure out the algorithms of
intelligence and the ways that they're intricately intertwined. Consequently, it's this approach
that excites the cognitive scientists.
Some computer theorists insist that the rules-based approach will get us to the brain-making
finish line first. Ben Goertzel is one such theorist. His basic argument is that other
approaches over-complicate and muddle the issue. He likens the approach to building
airplanes: we didn't have to reverse engineer the bird to learn how to fly.
Essentially, cognitive scientists like Goertzel are confident that the hard-coding of artificial
general intelligence (AGI) is a more elegant and direct approach. It'll simply be a matter of
identifying and developing the requisite algorithms sufficient for the emergence of the traits
they're looking for in an AGI. They define intelligence in this context as the ability to detect
patterns in the world, including in itself.
To that end, Goertzel and other AI theorists have highlighted the importance of developing
effective learning algorithms. A new mind comes into the world as a blank slate, they argue,
and it spends years learning, developing, and evolving. Intelligence is subject to both genetic
and epigenetic factors, and just as importantly, environmental factors. It is unreasonable, say
the cognitive scientists, to presume that a brain could suddenly emerge and be full of
intelligence and wisdom without any actual experience.
This is why Goertzel is working to create a "baby-like" artificial intelligence first, and then
raise and train this AI baby in a simulated or virtual world such as Second Life to produce a
more powerful intelligence. A fundamental assumption is that knowledge can be represented
in a network whose nodes and links carry "probabilistic truth values" as well as "attention
values," with the attention values resembling the weights in a neural network. There are a
number of algorithms that need to be developed in order to make the whole neural system
work, argues Goertzel, the central one being a probabilistic inference engine and a custom
version of evolutionary programming. Once these algorithms and associations are established,
it's just a matter of teaching the AI what it needs to know.

Whole brain emulation

DAILY EXPLAINER
2,434
How does the Anthropic Principle
change the meaning of the
universe?
SPONSORED
Your Favorite Fantasy Characters
Are Now Fighting To the Death
THIS IS AWESOME
8,803
Imagine Carl Sagan, Stephen
Hawking and Arthur C. Clarke
together in conversation. It
happened.
SATURDAY CARTOONS
2,252
A Very Special Episode of Archer
Tackles Human Trafficking
WRITING ADVICE
266
Flesh out your fictional characters
by having Redditors interview
them
SPACE
754
A star that looks older than the
universe itself
DEADPOOL
172
Bullet casings and shotgun shells
are the perfect media for
Deadpools portrait
WEBCOMICS
4,424
The Loneliest Unicorn is the
saddest, most beautiful thing
weve seen in ages

Neuroscientists aren't entirely convinced by the rules-based approach. They feel that
something is being left out of the equation, literally. Instead, they argue that researchers
should be inspired by an actual working model: our brains.

SUPERLIST
23,597
20 Lies Back to the Future II Told
Us (Besides the Hoverboard)

Indeed, whole brain emulation (WBE), the idea of reverse engineering the human brain,
makes both intuitive and practical sense. Unlike the rules-based approach, WBE works off a
tried-and-true working model; neuroscientists are not having to re-invent the wheel. Natural
selection, through excruciatingly tedious trial-and-error, created the human brain and all
without a preconceived design. They say there's no reason to believe that we can't model this
structure ourselves. If the brain could come about through autonomous processes, argue
neuroscientists, then it can most certainly come about through the diligent work of intelligent
researchers.

SCI FASHION
508
Crocheted Bane face mask keeps
you warm while youre terrorizing
Gotham

When talking about WBE it's important to distinguish between emulation and simulation.
Emulation refers to a 1-to-1 model where all relevant properties of a system exist. This doesn't
mean re-creating the human brain in exactly the same way as it resides inside our skulls.
Rather, it implies the re-creation of all its properties in an alternative substrate, namely a
computer system.
Moreover, emulation is not simulation. Neuroscientists are not looking to give the
appearance of human-equivalent cognition. A simulation implies that not all properties of a
model are present. Again, it's a complete 1:1 emulation that they're after.
A number of critics point out that we'll never completely emulate the human brain on account
of the chaos and complexity inherent in such a system. Others disagree. As researchers from
Oxford University have pointed out, we will not need to understand the whole system in order
to emulate it. What's required is a functional understanding of all necessary low-level
information about the brain and knowledge of the local update rules that change brain states
from moment to moment. What is meant by low-level at this point is an open question, but it
likely won't involve a molecule-by-molecule understanding of cognition. And as Ray Kurzweil
has revealed, the brain contains masterful arrays of redundancy; it's not as complicated as we
currently think.

ALIENS
1,241
This Aliens-inspired
advertisement is so awesome it
hurts
ASTRONOMY
3,272
Does our solar system have a
special connection to the structure
of the universe?
ANATOMY
2,814
What a trombonists lips look like
from inside the trombone
PHYSICS
643
Yes, the Vanilla Boson May Be
Real

In order to gain this "low-level functional understanding" of the human brain, neuroscientists

3/9/2013 11:42 PM

How will we build an artificial human brain?

3 of 4

http://io9.com/5906945/how-will-we-build-an-artificial-human-brain

will need to employ a series of interdisciplinary approaches (most of which are currently
underway). Specifically, they're going to require advances in:
Computer science: The hardware component has to be vastly improved. Scientists are
going to need machines with the processing power required to host a human brain. They're
also going to need to improve the software component so that they can create algorithmic
correlates to specific brain function.
Microscopy and scanning technologies: Scientists need to better study and map the
brain at the physical level. Brain slicing techniques will allow them to visibly study cognitive
action down to the molecular scale. Specific areas of inquiry will include molecular studies of
individual neurons, the scanning of neural connection patterns, determining the function of
neural clusters, and so on.
Neurosciences: Researchers need more impactful advances in the neurosciences so that
they can better understand the modular aspects of cognition and start mapping the neural
correlates of consciousness (what is currently a very grey area).
Genetics: Scientists need to get better at reading our DNA for clues about how the brain is
constructed. It's generally agreed that our DNA will not tell us how to build a fully functional
brain, but it will tell us how to start the process of brain-building from scratch.
Essentially, WBE requires three main capabilities: (1) the ability to physically scan brains in
order to acquire the necessary information, (2) the ability to interpret the scanned data to
build a software model, and (3) the ability to simulate this very large model.
WBE may be the right approach, but it's not going to be easy. Nor is it going to be quick. This
will be a multi-disciplinary endeavor that will require decades of data collection and the use
of technologies that don't yet exist. And importantly, success won't come about all at once.
This will be an incremental process in which individual developments will provide the
foundation for overcoming the next conceptual hurdle.

Time-frames
Inevitably the question as to "when" crops up. Unfortunately, we are still quite a ways off.
Kurzweil's prediction of emulating the brain by 2030 seems uncomfortably short that's only
18 years away. Moreover, his analogies to the human genome project are unsatisfying. This is
a project of much greater magnitude, not to mention that we're still likely heading down some
blind alleys. Similarly, Goertzel's predictions of success via the rules-based approach within
the next decade or two seems overly optimistic though arguably not impossible given his
"learning AI" approach.
A more likely scenario would see us code or emulate the human brain in about 50 to 75 years.
Possibly 100. That said, this is an exceptionally difficult thing to predict given the crudeness
of the neurosciences on the one hand, and the rate of accelerating change on the other. The
year 2050 is a kind of black hole when it comes to predictions.
Lastly, it's worth noting that, given the capacity to re-create a human brain in digital
substrate, we won't be too far off from creating considerably greater-than-human intelligence.
Computer theorist Eliezer Yudkowsky has claimed that, because of the brain's particular
architecture, we may be able to accelerate its processing speed by a factor of a million
relatively easily. Consequently, predictions as to when we may achieve greater-than-human
machine intelligence will likely co-incide with the advent of a fully emulated human brain.
Top image via pixeldreams.eu/Shutterstock.

Contact George Dvorsky:

COMMENT

DISCUSSIONS

FACEBOOK

FEATURED

TWITTER

ALL

Discussion now closed.

3/9/2013 11:42 PM

How will we build an artificial human brain?

4 of 4

http://io9.com/5906945/how-will-we-build-an-artificial-human-brain

First Evil Dead

reviews paint remake
as a psychotic
gorefest that will
make fans of the
original laugh

Staring Into the

Abyss

Top 10 Ways You Can

Waste Money
Without Realizing It

How To Cook A Steak

Indoors: A Guide For
The Winterbound

The First Unofficial

'Steam Box' Will
Launch This Holiday
Season Starting At
$1,000

You'll Be Jealous of
Your Local Prepper
Chick When the
SHTF and YOYO

Watch This
736-Horsepower
Volkswagen Golf
Declare War On Its
Front Tires

How to Opt Out of

Facebook's Creepy
New Targeted Ads

About

Help

Jobs

Legal

Privacy

Permissions

Advertising

Subscribe

Send a tip

3/9/2013 11:42 PM