PAPERS
THEORETICAL EDUCATION MANAGEMENT
ARRANGED BY:
SUSI PARLINA Siswanti
(G VI)
GRADUATE PROGRAM
EDUCATION STUDY PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION
UNIVERSITY pakuan
BOGOR
2014
FOREWORD
Bismillahirrohmanirrohiim ..
Alhamdulillahhirobbil'alamiin. Praise the author turning to the presence of Almighty God who has bestowed His grace and guidance
to the author, so I can complete the task this paper.
This paper the authors collated after searching for relevant data from various sources. This paper was made to fulfill the task
of Lecturers course Educational Management Theory basis, Mr Dr. H. Djoehana Setyamidjaja, M.Pd also to inform new insights to
our coworkers.
There is no ivory that is not cracked, so did the authors were just ordinary people who try to give the best thing a writer can. Criticism
and constructive suggestions very authors expect that the authors can be better in the future.
Highest appreciation authors convey to all those who assisted in the preparation of this paper assignment, may be good deeds and get
the reward from God Almighty. Aamiin.
This paper is basically a summary of results from various sources were adequate regarding Execution Comparison KBK, SBC and
Curriculum 2013. Hopefully this paper can be useful for the reader.
Bogor,
January 2014
Author
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background Masalah....................................................................................................................................... .1
1.2 Problem Formulation ............................................... ......................... 2
1.3 Objective Discussion ............................................... ......................... 2
PART I
PRELIMINARY
1.1. Background
The education process in learning activities or in the classroom, will be running smoothly, enabling, interactive, and so forth, if based
on the basic curriculum is good and right.Education can be run properly when the curriculum becomes the main support in the
learning process. The curriculum contains many constructive elements that performing optimal learning.Some experts curriculum
found in the heart of education is the curriculum. Good and poor educational outcomes are determined by the curriculum.
In the history of education in Indonesia has several times been modified and improved curriculum goal is of course to adapt them to
the development and progress of time. The closest that a change of kurukulum based (KBK) into educational unit level curriculum
(SBC), then switch again to curriculum 2013. Apart from whatever cause whether it was due to political issues, changes in
leadership / minister or because it is deemed to be a definite change its contents have changed. Well, as a minimum academic us
analyze the nature of the curriculum.So we know what and how the CBC, Kpts and the 2013 curriculum.
By knowing the nature of both the comparative analysis we can do. Comparative Analysis of CBC, SBC and Curriculum 2013 views
of shared viewpoints. At least with the comparative analysis, we can know the what the cause that must be held true change in the
curriculum is relevant or not, right or not such changes. With appropriate curriculum and appropriate, it can be expected educational
goals and objectives will be achieved to the fullest
CHAPTER II
THEORITICAL REVIEW
formulation of this curriculum mengandungmakna that includes curriculum plan, content, and materials and ways of teaching and
learning activities. [3]
students can be seen in the ability of the student / students in completing the tasks that must be controlled in accordance with the
standards of a particular procedure.
In the era of autonomy, as now the curriculum in force in national, not a "fixed price" that must be accepted and implemented as is,
but can still be developed in accordance with the circumstances and conditions in the field, as long as not to deviate from the
principal that has been outlined in, national. In this case the teacher / lecturer is curriculum developers who are, in a decisive and
strategic position.
Standards of competence is defined as roundness knowledge, keterampilari, attitudes, and achieved the expected level of mastery in
studying a subject. Scope of the standard of competence standard content (content standards) and appearance standards (performance
standards). [4]
SBC is one form of realization of the decentralization policy in the field of education to the curriculum really fit with the needs of the
development potential of learners at the school in question in the present and the future taking into account the interests of local,
national and global demand with the spirit of school-based management (SBM ).
curriculum content is still too dense, this is indicated by the number of subjects and a lot of material that the extent and level
competency-based are not yet fully in accordance with the demands of the functions and objectives of national education;
(iii)
competency domains holistically not describe attitudes, skills, and knowledge; some competencies required in accordance
with the development needs (eg character education, active learning methodology, the balance of soft skills and hard skills,
entrepreneurship) have not been accommodated in the curriculum;
(iv)
yet sensitive and responsive to social change at the local, national, or global;
(v)
standard not describe the learning process of learning the detailed sequence of opening up the possibility that diverse
assessment standards yet to lead to a competency-based assessment (process and results) and not explicitly demand a
SBC requires more detailed curriculum documents so as not to cause multiple interpretations. In these reasons there is a factor
the competence of the future, where the graduate should be able to communicate, to think clearly and critically, is able to consider the
moral aspects of a problem.
Here we can see that the graduates were born of this character-based curriculum implementation can be a great graduates and able to
compete internationally if the curriculum is well run and right by all parties concerned.
CHAPTER III
DISCUSSION
Generally the purpose of implementation of the curriculum is to empower education unit's independence and through the granting of
authority (autonomy) to educational institutions.SBC provides the opportunity for schools to participate actively in the development
of the curriculum.
1. The implementation of the curriculum in all schools and levels of education, namely:
July 2015: class I, II, III, IV, V, VI, VII, VIII, IX, X, XI, and XII
course adds to the complexity of the implementation of education. Finally, the victims are the people and children who are being
educated.
Substitution ongoing curriculum, 2004 curriculum called Competency Based Curriculum (KBK) still whole corn suddenly turned
into the so-called 2006 Curriculum Education Unit Level Curriculum (SBC). The author himself has not been so long engaged in
education, new almost stepped on the fourth year, therefore it is not a lot of experience are qualified to write CBC comparison, SBC
and Curriculum 2013.
I never experienced a period of learning on CBC, but from some of the experiences of their colleagues writer, the writer can draw
a little understanding, that the CBC focuses on mastery of learners will be the subject matter. Teachers will continue to strive to make
the entire participant students understand the material that he gave, so the weakness that shows up is the completion of all of the
material that should be given. Thus the teacher will have a material debt, because he had to wait until all children understand. While
learning in the curriculum is focused on the delivery completeness teaching materials, so they can make some students who struggle
to digest the lessons left behind.
Then other differences are on the subject, when the CBC and SBC, subjects such as stand-alone, while the latest curriculum
already terintegratif and tied to core competencies.For more details can be seen from the table below:
PBC and SBC
curriculum 2013
1.
1.
2.
2.
subjects
3.
knowledge shaper
4.
5.
knowledge,
4.
subjects.
competency
5.
Table 3.2.
curriculum 2013
ICT as a subject
knowledge
10
CHAPTER IV
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
4.1. Conclusion
From the explanation in this paper, it can be concluded:
1.
Competency-Based Curriculum is a concept of a curriculum that emphasizes the development of the ability to perform tasks
with the competence of a particular performance, so the results can be felt by students, such as mastery of a particular set of
competencies.Competence is essentially a blend of knowledge, skills, values and attitudes are reflected in the habit of thinking and
acting.
2.
SBC is one form of realization of the decentralization policy in the field of education to the curriculum really fit with the needs
of the development potential of learners at the school in question in the present and the future taking into account the interests of
local, national and global demand with the spirit of school-based management (SBM ).
3.
Curriculum 2013 is part of the continuing development of the CBC which were initiated in 2004 to include competency
attitudes, knowledge, and skills in an integrated manner, as mandated by Law 20 of 2003 on National Education System in the
explanation of Article 35, where the competence of graduates qualified in the ability of graduates includes attitudes, knowledge, and
skills in accordance with national standards that have been agreed.
The curriculum now is a refinement of the previous curriculum, therefore Based on the author's experience is still green, every
curriculum certainly has advantages and disadvantages of each, of course, there will never be perfect, because the government
continues its efforts to improve education in Indonesia through innovation -inovasi, curriculum changes along with the change of
education minister.
4.2. Suggestion
Basically, all the curriculum is the same, the government's efforts in improving the quality of education is precisely to cause
confusion, difficult and complicated because of the lack of socialization and training of teachers.Competency-Based Curriculum has
not been entirely successful already changed into the curriculum Education Unit, curriculum is not a long walk has been replaced
with the curriculum in 2013.
Nothing is perfect, although the curriculum is constantly changing, the author can draw the conclusion that the achievement of
the objectives of education is not only the task of the government, but it is the duty of all of us, teachers, students, community. The
curriculum now we should learn and execute well.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
http://linda-haffandi.blogspot.com/2013/10/kbk-ktsp-dan-kurikulum-2013.html
http://risafebriindrian.blogspot.com/
[5] Dian Sukmara, Implementation of life skills in thecurriculum. (Bandung: Mugni prosperous 2007),
hlmn. 21
[6] Vienna Sanjaya, curriculum and learning. (Jakarta:Kencana, 2010), hlmn. 128
[7] E. Mulyasa. Implementation of the 2004 curriculum learning guides CBC. (Bandung: Rosda
works 2006), hlmn. 3