Short communication
Corresponding Author:
Ahmad Haerian-Ardakani, Shahid
Sadoughi Dental faculty, Dahe-fajr
Blvd.,Yazd, Iran.
Email: ahmad.haerian@gmail.com
Tel: (+98) 9133536957
Received: 20 April 2014
Revised: 27 September 2014
Accepted: 28 December 2014
Abstract
Background: There have been speculations about the effects of hormonal changes
and socio-demographic factors on periodontal health during pregnancy.
Objective: According to the lack of sufficient epidemiologic information about the
periodontal status of pregnant women in Yazd, this study was accomplished to
determine the changes of Community Periodontal Index for Treatment Needs
(CPITN) during pregnancy and evaluating the possible relationship between this
index and demographic characteristics of the mothers.
Materials and Methods: This was a longitudinal descriptive study. The samples
included 115 pregnant women who were referred to health centers of Yazd, Iran.
The mothers data were obtained from a questionnaire consisted of 3 parts: consent
paper, demographic data and CPITN records. Examination was performed with
dental unit light, flat dental mirror and WHOs scaled probe.
Results: In the beginning of the study, 60.1% of checked sextants had healthy
gingival status. 25.9% had code1 and 14% had code 2. Code 3 and 4 were not seen
in any sextants. There was a significant relationship between lower CPITN and
higher maternal education, occupation and more frequencies of tooth-brushing but
there was not a relationship between CPITN and mothers age and number of
pregnancies. CPITN had a significant relationship with increasing of the gestational
age.
Conclusion: There might be a relationship between increasing the month of
pregnancy and more periodontal treatment needs. CPITN Increasing during
pregnancy shows the importance of periodontal cares during this period.
Key words: CPITN, Pregnancy, Periodontal status, Demographic.
This article extracted from D.D.S. thesis. (Salem Mohammadi-Asl)
17T
Introduction
Iranian Journal of Reproductive Medicine Vol. 13. No. 2. pp: 107-112, February 2015
Results
In this study, 115 pregnant women with an
average age of 26.284.03 participated.
Demographic information of pregnant women
in the study is shown in table I. Among all
examined sextants of participants, there were
a total of 11 edentulous Sextants which were
not included in the study and findings were
reported on the base of 679 remained
Sextants. At baseline, 408 Sextants (60.1%)
were healthy and had code 0, 176 sextants
(25.9%) had code 1 and 95 Sextants (14%)
had code 2 and no Sextants with codes 3 and
4 were observed.
As can be seen in table II, the initial
CPITNs in different age groups were
compared with each other by Chi-square test
and no significant relationship between this
index and age was indicated (p=0.36) (Table
II). Code zero, which indicates healthy
periodontal status was more frequent in
Iranian Journal of Reproductive Medicine Vol. 13. No. 2. pp: 107-112, February 2015
Number
Percentage
41
52
22
35.7
45.2
19.1
11
20
54
30
9.6
17.4
47
26
92
23
80
20
109
Rashidi Maybodi et al
Table II. Comparison of different codes of the first trimester CPITNs frequency on the basis of demographic data, brushing
frequency, and parity
0
Total
p-value
Age
Under 25 years-old
187 (60.5)
88 (28.5)
34 (11)
0 (0)
0 (0)
309 (100)
25-30 years-old
159 (65.4)
55 (22.6)
29 (11.9)
0 (0)
0 (0)
243 (100)
0.36
Over 30 years-old
62 (48.8)
33 (26)
32 (25.2)
0 (0)
0 (0)
127 (100)
Education
Illiterate
21 (35)
20 (33.3)
19 (31.7)
0 (0)
0 (0)
60 (100)
Under Diploma
50 (43.1)
35 (30.2)
31 (26.7)
0 (0)
0 (0)
116 (100)
0.001
Diploma
207 (64.1)
81 (25.1)
35 (10.8)
0 (0)
0 (0)
323 (100)
Higher than Diploma
130 (72.2)
40 (22.2)
10 (5.6)
0 (0)
0 (0)
180 (100)
Occupation
Housekeeper
3.8 (56.9)
143 (26.4)
90 (16.6)
0 (0)
0 (0)
541 (100)
0.001
Employed
100 (72.5)
33 (23.9)
5 (3.6)
0 (0)
0 (0)
138 (100)
Brushing frequency
1
117 (50.2)
56 (24)
60 (25.8)
0 (0)
0 (0)
233 (100)
2
169 (58.3)
88 (30.3)
33 (11.4)
0 (0)
0 (0)
290 (100)
0.001
3
122 (78.2)
32 (20.5)
2 (1.3)
0 (0)
0 (0)
156 (100)
Parity
1
185 (61.1)
80 (26.4)
38 (12.5)
0 (0)
0 (0)
303 (100)
2
168 (62.5)
70 (26)
31 (11.5)
0 (0)
0 (0)
269 (100)
3
49 (53.8)
20 (22)
22 (24.2)
0 (0)
0 (0)
91 (100)
0.12
4
2 (18.2)
6 (54.5)
3 (27.3)
0 (0)
0 (0)
11 (100)
5
4 (80)
0 (0)
1 (20)
0 (0)
0 (0)
5 (100)
Data are presented as n (%).
Chi-Square test
CPITN: Community Periodontal Index for Treatment Needs
* In housekeepers group, 11 edentulous sextants existed which were not considered as separated ones.
0
408 (59.1)
388 (57.1)
316 (46.5)
1
176 (25.5)
156 (23)
132 (19.4)
Chi-Square test
CPITN
p-value
2
3
4
95 (13.8)
0 (0)
0 (0)
135 (19.8)
0 (0)
0 (0)
0.018
220 (32.4)
11 (1.6)
0 (0)
CPITN: Community Periodontal Index for Treatment Needs
Discussion
In the present study, among 679 examined
sextants, 60.1% of these sextants were
healthy and 25.9% and 14% had code 1 and 2
respectively. No sextant with code 3 and 4
was observed. This can be a sign of fairly
good hygiene performance in pregnant
women, compared to the past. The results of
two previous studies conducted in the city of
Yazd showed that the oral health of pregnant
women in Yazd has also been steadily
improving in the interval between those
studies (14, 15).
In this study, the CPITN indices among
pregnant women in three age groups (less
than 25 years, 30-25 years and 30 years)
were not significantly different with each other,
but the fact that the sextants with zero code in
women over age 30 were less than two
younger age groups and the highest
frequency of code 2 were seen in this age
group, showed that the higher the age, the
periodontal status gets worse. These results
110
Iranian Journal of Reproductive Medicine Vol. 13. No. 2. pp: 107-112, February 2015
Acknowledgments
This study was done by financial support of
Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical
Sciences.
Conflict of interest
Authors have no conflicts of interest in this
study.
References
1. Newman MG, Takei HH, Carranza FA, Klokkevold
th
PR. Carranza's clinical periodontology 10 Ed.
Philadelphia, WB Saunders; 2006.
2. Gnc GN, Tzm TF, Calayan F. Effects of
endogenous sex hormones on the periodontiumreview ofliterature. Aust Dent J 2005; 50: 138-145.
3. Rose LF, Mealey BL, Genco R. Periodontics,
medicine, surgery and implant. St. Louis Missouri,
Mosby; 2004.
4. Haerian-Ardakani A, Eslami Z, Rashidi-Meibodi F,
Haerian A, Dallalnejad P. Relationship between
maternal periodontal disease and low birth weight
babies. Iran J Reprod Med 2013; 11: 625-630.
5. Khader Y, Al-shishani L, Obeidat B, Khassawneh M,
Burgan S, Amarin ZO, et al. Maternal periodontal
status and preterm low birth weight delivery: a casecontrol study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2009; 279: 165169.
6. Mokeem SA, Molla GN, AL-Jewair TS. The
prevalence and relationship between periodontal
disease and preterm low birth weight infants at King
Khalid University Hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. J
Contemp Dent Pract 2004; 5: 40-56.
7. Toygar HU, Seydaoglu G, Kurklu S, Guzeldemir E,
Arpak N. periodontal health and adverse pregnancy
outcome in 3576 Turkish women. J Periodontol
2007; 78: 2081-2094.
8. Shirinzad M, Tiznobaik A, Ranjbari A, Abdolsamadi
HR. The Study of MothersPeriodontal Status and
newborns low birth weight. J Hamadan Univ Med Sci
2006; 41: 57-61.
9. Wandera M, Engebretsen IM, Okullo I, Tumwine JK,
Astrm AN. Socio-demographic factors related to
periodontal status and tooth loss of pregnant women
in Mbale district, Uganda. BMC Oral Health 2009; 9:
18.
10. Golpasand Hagh L, Zakavi F, Taymuri H. Evaluation
of Community Periodontal Index of Treatment Needs
in Pregnant and Non Pregnant Women. Sci Med J
2011; 10: 309-316.
11. Yalcin F, Eskinazi E, Soydinc M, Basegmez C,
Issever H, Isik G, et al. The effect of sociocultural
status on periodontal conditions in pregnancy. J
Periodontol 2002; 73: 178-182.
12. Tezel A. periodontal condition of pregnant women
assessed by CPITN and the role of nurses according
to the needs of treatment. Health Med 2011; 1: 19511955.
13. Pak Nejad M, Ghavam M, Khoshbar M. [The
prevalence of CPITN in pregnant and feeding women
Iranian Journal of Reproductive Medicine Vol. 13. No. 2. pp: 107-112, February 2015
111
Rashidi Maybodi et al
112
1902.
17. Safavi SD, Gholak Kheibari P. Evaluation of CPI
index of pregnant women referring to Taleghani and
29 Bahman hospitals, Tabriz, 2001. J Dent Sch 2003;
21: 536-543. (In Persian)
18. Nouri M, Valaie N, Sadeghi SF, Bidarmanesh A. An
epidemiological assessment on periodontal status of
pregnant women (Tehran-Ghaemshahr) 1997. J
Dent Sch 1999; 4: 374-380. (In Persian)
19. Vogt M, Sallum AW, Cecatti JG, Morais SS. Factors
associated with the prevalence of periodontal
disease in low-risk pregnant women. Reprod Health
2012; 9: 3.
20. Torabi M, Najafi GhA, Mskani AR. Evaluation of
CPITN index in pregnant women Kerman 2001-2002.
J Dent Sch 2006; 24: 33-39. (In Persian)
10T
10T
Iranian Journal of Reproductive Medicine Vol. 13. No. 2. pp: 107-112, February 2015