as
comprehensive
synthetic
science
is
the
learning
and
teaching?
Epistemology,
Axiology
and
Logic
Metaphysics.
Metaphysics is the study of nature of reality. It involves
speculative way of thinking about realities in man, world
and hereafter and cannot be answered merely by
scientific investigation. It also can be defined as the
study of creation, existence, reality ,essence or nature
of the world. Ontology, a central branch of metaphysics
deals with the investigation the categorization of
elements in the world and their relations. In simpler
words, it is the study ultimate of reality. Metaphysics
tries to resolve issues like what is the ground basis of
human existence? Whether man has a soul and its
function?
The
metaphysical
studies
allows
educationist
to
Epistemology
Epistemology
is
the
branch
of
philosophy
that
validity
and
limits
of
the
knowledge
certainty
can
only
be
possible
in
field of
sciences.
(Chandra,Sharma,2004)
Axiology
This branch of philosophy philosophically studies moral
values such and human development such as ethics,
aesthetics and religions. Main aspect of ethics covers
mainly on the criteria of right and good while aesthetics
studies the nature and elements pertaining to beauty.
(Chandra,Sharma,2004)
Logic
Logic might be summarized as the organisation of
knowledge or science that assess arguments to
differentiate between valid and fallacious thinking.
(Hurley,1982). It facilitates to evaluate the learners
reasoning, the validity of newly encountered information
and communicate more efficiently by encouraging
systematic thoughts. The knowledge of logic helps
students
in
avoiding
error
and
drawing
correct
and
point
out
misconception.
(Chandra,Sharma,2004)
Deductive
draws
conclusion
from
to
citizen
of
Malaysia
(Ministry
of
Education,2001).
This
Thisshiftalsoembedofabalancedsetofknowledgeandskills
likecriticalandcreativethinking,problemsolvingandleaderships.
Theseskillsarecrucialandwillbenurturedtodrivestudents
towardsgreaterandprolongintrincsicmotivation,selfexpression
andfreedomintheirlearningpatternsandthusdeveloptheir
lifelonglearningprocess.Hence,MOEaspirestolaunchnew
Secondary School Standard Curriculum or Kurikulum Standard
Sekolah Menengah (KSSM) and revised Primary School Standard
Curriculum or Kurikulum Standard Sekolah Rendah (KSSR) in 2017.
These curricula will stress on student-centeredness and
differentiated teaching where it will cater different needs of its
learners. Moreover, it will focus more on project-based and
problem-based work to promote intellectual growth and develop
sets of skills mentioned above.
toleverageICTandscalingupqualitylearningacrossMalaysia
includingruralarea.ICTineducationareimperativeasitprovides
opportunitiestolearnerstoexplorewiderandinteractivecontent.
ICThastonnesofpotientaltoacceleratelearningandenhance
teachinglearningprocesswhereitassiststeachersandprincipalsto
improvetheirteachingpracticingbymakingaccesstoboth
nationalandinternationalonlineresourcesavailable.(Malaysian
Education Blueprint 2013-2025,page E-19).
Malaysiahasbeenamongthefirstcountriesintheworld
constructedandpioneeredastrategiceducationalICTplan.MOE
perceivesIctasasameananddevelopingtoolnourishcurricula,
enhancepedagogiesandpromoteseffectivenessinschool
organisationstructure.TofulfillMoesmissionstatementand
accomplishthegoalsofVision2020,theMinisterofMOE,YAB
TanSriDatoSeriMusaMohammad,reiteratestheimportance
knowledgebasedsocietybyimplyingthatliteracyshouldnotonly
beperceivedasinabilitytowritenorreadonly,butalsoincluding
computerliteracy.(Mohamad,2002).Hence,Malaysiais
determinedtosteertheeconomytowardsaknoledgebased
economytofacetheglobalizationandchallengingfuture.
InordertosupportprogressivetransformationofICTmasterplan
andalligningthisplanwithNPE,MinisterofEducationhascame
upwithvariousinitiaviteforinstace:Smartschoolproject,ICT
traininginschools,andInternetConnectionandUsageinnational
schools.
TheMalaysiansmartschoolprojectwaslaunchedbythePrime
MinisterinJuly1997tohelpthiscountryachievetheaimsofNPE
andnurturethedevelopmentofskilledworkforceandprepared
themtomeetthechallengesof21stcentury.MalaysianSmart
SchoolorlocallyknownasSekolahBestarihasbeensystemically
renownedinaspectofteachinglearningpracticesandschool
administration.Theintroductionofsmartschoolhelpsprimaryand
schoolschooltomovefrommemorybasedlearningtoanew
educationsystemthatpromotescriciticalthinking,creativityand
catersvariouslearningstylesanddifferences.(MoE, 1997).
Previous two decade, MOE had made capitalinvestment in education field and spent almost RM6
billion towards additional computer labs and building
computer lab in every school. In spite of bulk of these
funds go for betterment ICT facilities in school; the
ICT usage was still limited. Only 20% of teachers
spend more than one hour a week using ICT and only
a third of students recognised their teachers had
integrated ICT in their lesson. The usage of ICT only
limited to the Power Point usage as an instructional
and teaching tool and ICT is not being used to
nourish students creativity, problem solving, critical
thinking and communication skills. (Malaysian
Education Blueprint 2013-2025,page 6-20).
This problem arises due to insufficient training and
services like technicians to maintain ICT equipment.
Even in cases where services and supports are
available, it is not always sustainable. Another
problem is the lack of long-term strategy in
continuing and elevating key implementation
elements policy like ICT infrastructure and teacher
capabilities. Therefore, these investments have not
been rigorously and closely monitored to determine
impact. . (Malaysian Education Blueprint 20132025,page 6-21).
Therefore with the new education wave, MOE aspires
for all school to meet minimum standard of ICT
availability, utilization, and application. Hence, MOE
adopts several guidelines for ICT strategy
InadditiontoSmartSchoolprojectTheMOEhasspentbilliionsof
RinggitMalaysiatoovercomeeducatinaldisparitywithinruraland
urbanareabyprovidingcomputerlaboratoriestothousandsos
chools.
Reference
1. http://oregonstate.edu/instruct/ed416/PP1.html
2. Dewey, J. (1966). Democracy and education: An
introduction to the philosophy of education. New
York: The Free Press.
3. Windelband,W.,&Tufts,J.H.(1958).Ahistoryof
philosophy.NewYork:Harper&Brothers.
4. Leighton,J.A.(1930).Thefieldofphilosophy;an
introductiontothestudyofphilosophies.NewYork:D.
AppletonandCompany.
5. Lal,C.(1). Metaphysical Problems and Education,
IJELH Journal of Research
6. Dew,J.K.(2014).HowDoWeKnow?:AnIntroductionto
Epistemology.IVPAcademic.
7. Hurley,P.J.(1982).Instructor'smanual:Aconcise
introductiontologic.Belmont,CA:WadsworthPub.
8. Ministry of Education. (2001). Falsafah pendidikan
kebangsaan, matlamatdan misi [national
philosophy of education, Goal, and mission].
Putrajaya, Malaysia: Curriculum Development Centre.
AchievementsinTechnologyEducationandDevelopment.
doi:10.5772/9231
16.
Rosnaini Mahmud and Mohd Arif Hj. Ismail
(2009). Integrating Eduwebtv into Malaysian
schools:
17.
Challenges ahead. In S.L. Wong, Mas Nida
Md Khambari, Abu Daud Silong and Othman Talib
(Eds.), Technology and Education Issues,
Empirical and Applications (pp. 47-58). Serdang:
Universiti Putra Malaysia Press.
18.
19.