Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Al-Jouf University, P.O. 2014,
Skaka, Saudi Arabia.
2
Microbiology Section, Botany Department, Faculty of Sciences, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, 41522, Egypt.
3
Women Health Department, Faculty of Medicine, King Khaled University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Accepted 6 April, 2013
Natural products are still major sources of innovative therapeutic agents for various conditions,
including infectious diseases. Origanum majorana L., Peganum harmala L. and Salvia officinalis L. oils
had wide range uses as traditional medicinal plants in Egypt. The current study was designed to
evaluate the antibacterial activity of O. majorana, P. harmala and S. officinalis essential oils growing in
Egypt for first time. The chemical constitutes and toxicity of these oils were also determined to obtain
further information on the correlation between the chemical contents and antibacterial activity. The
antibacterial effect of the essential oils of O. majorana, P. harmala and S. officinalis oils were studied
against some food borne pathogenic bacteria species. The oils of each plant were subjected to gas
chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC/MS). The impact of oils administration on the change in rate of
weight gain and complete blood picture in hamsters were investigated. P. harmala oil had strong
antibacterial effect against bacterial species especially at minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) less
than 75.0 g/ml. From the oil of P. harmala, forty one compounds were identified, and the major
constituent was 1-hexyl-2-nitrocyclohexane (9.07%). Acute toxicity test was performed on hamsters and
showed complete survival after 14 days, and there no toxicity symptoms occurred. This study
demonstrated that these essential oils seemed to be destitute of toxic effect which could compromise
the medicinal use of these plants in folk medicine.
Keywords: Analysis mass spectrometry, antibacterial activities, acute toxicity, chemical constitutes, gas
chromatography, weight gain, Origanum majorana, Peganum harmala, Salvia officinalis.
INTRODUCTION
There is a continuous and urgent need to discover new
antimicrobial compounds with diverse chemical structures
and novel mechanisms of action because there has been
an alarming increase in the incidence of new and reemerging infectious diseases. Another big concern is the
development of resistance to the antibiotics in current
726
Selim et al.
727
Statistical analysis
The variations between experiments were estimated by standard
deviations, and statistical significance of changes was estimated by
students t-test. Only the probability P 5% was regarded as
indicative of statistical significance.
RESULTS
The patterns of antibacterial effect of oils from O.
majorana were detected after treatment of the studied
bacterial species (Table 1). Moderate effect was
observed at all concentration on Bacillus cereus. Weak
effect was detected at all concentrations of this oil on
Salmonella indica and S. aureus. No effect (-) was
recorded at concentrations of 250 g/ml of this oil after
treatment of Escherichia coli. The chemical composition
of the commercial oil of O. majorana was determined by
GC/MS method. Seventeen compounds (Table 2 and
Figure 1a) were identified, and the following compounds
are representing the major constituents: (1) 1,30dibromotriacontane (41.07%), (2) 11-tricosene (15.35%),
(3) 1,38-dibromooctatriacontane (9.78%), (4) 1pentacontanol
(9.05%),
(5)
O-2-methylpropylhydroxylamine (7.02%), (6) 2-piperidinone,N-(4-bromo-Nbutyl) (6.39%), (7) 2-methyl-tricosane (3.07%) and (8) 9cyclohexyl-eicosane (2.17%), respectively.
The effect of P. harmala oil on the growth of B. cereus,
S. indica, S. aureus and E. coli are shown in Table 1. The
obtained results revealed that concentrations (75 g/ml)
of P. harmala oil had the highest antibacterial activity
against B. cereus and S. aureus. The concentration of
250 g/ml was not effective against S. indica. The chemical composition of the commercial oil of P. harmala
was determined by GC/MS method. Forty one compounds (Table 3 and Figure 1b) were identified and the
following compounds are representing the major constituents: (1) 1-hexyl-2-nitrocyclohexane (9.07%), (2) Z-2octadecan-1-ol (8.13%), (3) 3,5,24-trimethyltetracontane
(7.84%), (4) 2-octadecyl-1,3- propane-diol (6.18%), (5) E2-tetradecen-1-ol (5.89%), (6) 11,14-ecosadienoic acid
728
43
100
Scan EI+
TIC
3.49e7
x0.5
37.30
57.0
38.93
57.0
40.09
57.0
9.15
57.0
9.45
57.0
41.37
57.0
35.59
57.0
11.13
57.0
47.85
57.0
40.51
57.0
36.82
57.0
42.52
57.0
34.94
57.0
12.39
57.0
46.19
57.0
34.43
33.12 57.0
57.0
Tim e
13.47
18.47
23.47
28.47
33.47
38.47
43.47
44
16.76
164.2
b
Concentration (%)
Scan EI+
TIC
7.37e7
34.14
55.1
100
34.03
67.1
27.58
43.1
10.95
95.1
29.67
43.1
30.74
73.0
31.68
43.1
25.33
43.1
35.43
43.1
37.17
43.1
33.58
43.1
9.07
43.1
12.31
43.1
14.43
43.1
17.80
43.1
19.92
119.2
22.52
43.1
29.24
57.0
22.92
43.1
32.88
43.1
38.85
43.1
40.46
43.1
27.15
57.0
24.93
57.0
22.11
43.1
41.48
57.1
28.92
43.1
42.07
57.1
47.18
57.1
46.19
43.1
47.80
207.1
Tim e
13.50
18.50
23.50
28.50
33.50
38.50
43.50
45
100
Scan EI+
TIC
1.20e7
x0.5
c
9.18
43.1
9.23
43.1
9.66
43.1
10.06
43.1
47.64
207.2
38.88
57.1
11.80
43.1
33.98
55.1
37.27
57.1
35.56
57.1
15.12
43.1
40.03
57.1
47.18
207.2
40.46
57.1
42.44
57.1
46.03
57.1
43.89
57.1
33.87
67.1
17.78
43.1
Tim e
13.44
18.44
23.44
28.44
33.44
38.44
43.44
Time (s)
Figure 1. Gas chromatographic profile of the major constituents of (a) Origanum majorana, (b) Peganum harmala and (c) Salvia
officinalis oils.
Selim et al.
729
Table 1. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Origanum majorana , Peganum harmala and Salvia officinallis oils against
studied bacterial species.
Plant species
Origanum majorana
Peganum harmala
Salvia officinallis
Bacillus cereus
M
S
W
Bacterial species
Staphylococcus aureus Salmonella indica
W
W
S
N
W
W
Escherichia coli
N
M
N
Where MIC less than 75.0 g/ml was considered to have strong antimicrobial activity (S), from 75.0 to 150.0 g/ml, the
antimicrobial activity was moderate (M), from 150.0 to 250.0 g/ml, the antimicrobial activity was weak (W), and over 250.0
g/ml, the extract was considered inactive (N).
Compound
1,30-Dibromotriacontane
11-Tricosene
1,38-Dibromooctatriacontane
1-Pentacontanol
O-2-Methylpropyl-hydroxylamine
2-Piperidinone, N-[4-bromo-N-butyl]
2-Methyl-tricosane,
9-Cyclohexyl-eicosane,
1,54-Dibromo-tetrapentacontane,
2,4,6-Tritert-butyl-4-methyl-2,5-cyclohexadien-1-one
1-Hexyl-2-nitrocyclohexane
2-Azido-2,3,3-trimethylbutane
6-Ethyl-2-methyl-decane
N-(1-phenyl-2-propanyl)-1-decanamine
DL-3,4-dimethyl-3,4-hexanediol
Taurolidine
2-Aminononadecane
Identied components (%)
MW
578
322
690
718
89
233
338
364
914
276
213
141
184
275
146
284
283
Formula
C30H60Br2
C23H46
C38H76Br2
C50H102O
C4H11ON
C9H16ONBr
C24H50
C26H52
C54H108Br2
C19H32O
C12H23O2N
C7H15N3
C13H28
C19H33N
C8H18O2
C7H16O4N4S2
C19H41N
RT
41.85827
38.86413
41.666
36.2113
11.391
33.71163
29.721
37.01467
38.37167
21.659
33.323
15.553
26.7075
27.177
25.7035
10.999
28.087
wt %
41.07
15.346
9.777
9.046
7.023
6.391
3.071
2.173
1.493
1.441
0.719
0.699
0.598
0.597
0.308
0.126
0.121
100
methyl ester (5.79%), (7) eugenol (5.22%), (8) 2,6,10,15tetramethyl-heptadecane, (4.26%), (9) 11-tricosene
(4.10%),
(10)
2-piperidinone,N-(4-bromo-N-butyl)
(3.49%), (11) L-(+)-ascorbic acid 2,6-dihexadecanoate
(3.47%), (12) 14-heptadecenal (2.87%), (13) E-9-tetra
decenoic acid (2.77%), (14) 1,1-dodecanediol, diacetate
(2.64%) and (15) 2-methyl-7-octadecyne (2.45%),
respectively.
Two patterns were observed after treatment of S.
officinalis oil on the studied bacterial species. No effect
(N) and weak effect (W). The first one, no effect, was
recovered in E. coli after treatment with concentration
(250 g/ml) of S. officinalis oil (Table 1). The weak effect
was also recorded in B. cereus, S. aureus and S. indica
at all concentrations of S. officinalis oil. The chemical
composition of the commercial oil of S. officinalis was
730
Compound
1-Hexyl-2-nitrocyclohexane
Z-2-Octadecen-1-ol
3,5,24-Trimethyltetracontane
2-Octadecyl-1,3-propane-diol
E-2-Tetradecen-1-ol
11,14-Eicosadienoic acid methyl ester
Eugenol
2,6,10,15-Tetramethyl-heptadecane,
11-Tricosene
2-Piperidinone, n-[4-bromo-n-butyl]
l-(+)-Ascorbic acid 2,6-dihexadecanoate
14-Heptadecenal
E-9-Tetradecenoic acid
1,1-Dodecanediol, diacetate
2-Methyl-7-octadecyne
2,6,10,14-Tetramethyl-heptadecane,
E-3-Pentadecen-2-ol
16-Heptadecenal
2-Dodecyl-oxirane,
E-15-Heptadecenal
Dl-3,4-Dimethyl-3,4-hexanediol
9-Octyl eicosane
1-(1,5-Dimethyl-4-hexenyl)-4-methylbenzene
6,10,14-Trimethyl-2-pentadecanone
Docosanoic acid, docosyl ester
Taurolidine
Heptafluorobutyric acid,n-tridecyl ester
9-Ethyl-9-heptyl octadecane
1,1-Dodecanediol, diacetate
1-Pentacontanol
4-Methyl cyclopentadecanone
Dl-3,4-dimethyl-3,4-hexanediol
Heptafluorobutyric acid, n-octadecyl ester
2,6,10,14-Tetramethyl heptadecane
Hexadecanoic acid, (3-bromoprop-2-ynyl) ester
Oxirane, 2-decyl-3-(5-methylhexyl)-, cis
2-Nonadecanone
Heptadecyl ester heptadecanoic acid
Dl-3,4-dimethyl-3,4-hexanediol
Eicosanoic acid
Heptane, 4-azido
Identied components (%)
MW
213
268
604
328
212
322
164
296
322
233
652
252
226
286
264
296
226
252
212
252
146
394
202
268
648
284
396
380
286
718
238
146
466
296
372
282
282
508
146
312
141
Formula
C12H23O2N
C18H36O
C43H88
C21H44O2
C14H28O
C21H38O2
C10H12O2
C21H44
C23H46
C9H16ONBr
C38H68O8
C17H32O
C14H26O2
C16H30O4
C19H36
C21H44
C15H30O
C17H32O
C14H28O
C17H32O
C8H18O2
C28H58
C15H22
C18H36O
C44H88O2
C7H16O4N4S2
C17H27O2F7
C27H56
C16H30O4
C50H102O
C18H36O
C8H18O2
C22H37O2F7
C43H88
C19H33O2Br
C19H38O
C19H38O
C34H68O2
C8H18O2
C21H44O2
C7H15N3
RT
34.087
30.88133
37.48822
28.502
28.2885
34.033
16.758
29.81033
25.97133
32.403
30.712
42.193
34.167
17.186
10.973
24.927
37.193
38.854
17.776
32.881
16.3454
44.3045
19.918
28.194
36.122
14.401
34.515
47.184
14.722
34.89
30.337
23.695
30.953
22.65
33.337
36.363
27.284
38.131
17.7555
26.587
10.598
wt %
9.072
8.125
7.84
6.181
5.893
5.787
5.216
4.261
4.097
3.486
3.465
2.875
2.765
2.64
2.448
1.954
1.679
1.576
1.446
1.323
1.264
1.228
0.967
0.82
0.738
0.704
0.689
0.628
0.616
0.519
0.458
0.408
0.364
0.329
0.321
0.27
0.217
0.169
0.113
0.096
0.504
99.67
Selim et al.
731
Compound
Docosanoic acid, docosyl ester
2-Piperidinone, n-[4-bromo-n-butyl]Dl-3,4-Dimethyl-3,4-hexanediol
1,30-Dibromo- triacontane,
11-Tricosene
1-Pentacontanol
1,38-Dibromo-octatriacontane,
Heptane, 4-azido3-Ethyl-5-(2-ethylbutyl)-octadecane,
3-Bromo-decane
1-Hexyl-2-nitrocyclohexane
2-Methyl-tricosane
o-(2-Methylpropyl)-hydroxylamine
1-(2-Decyldodecyl)-2,4-dimethyl- cyclopentane
2,3,4,5,6,7-hexahydro-3,6-dihexyl-10,11-diphenylbis[1,3]oxazino[6,5-f:5',6'-h]quinoxaline
Di-n-undecylamine
3,5,24-Trimethyltetracontane
Identied components (%)
MW
648
233
146
578
322
718
690
141
366
220
213
338
89
406
Formula
C44H88O2
C9H16ONBr
C8H18O2
C30H60Br2
C23H46
C50H102O
C38H76Br2
C7H15N3
C26H54
C10H21Br
C12H23O2N
C24H50
C4H11ON
C29H58
RT
43.45
34.6328
24.75505
39.9655
38.24571
37.40014
41.13075
12.20945
44.7088
26.065
34.12
31.06
9.928
40.555
wt %
16.625
15.022
12.821
10.906
9.027
6.497
5.856
4.153
4.11
3.07
2.434
1.929
1.802
1.147
564
C36H44O2N4
15.3605
1.057
325
604
C22H47N
C43H88
26.078
36.852
0.665
0.538
99.96
Table 5. Body weight (g) of hamsters treated with potent oils (mg/kg) for 14 days and percentage of weight gain.
Weight
Control
0
247.75
Weight
Weight gain (%)
241.16
-2.66
185.51
-16.15
131.2
0.68
156.88
-11.42
163.77
10.66
159.9
1.38
199.37
-5.28
92.82
2.54
138.12
0.82
160.19
-3.3
Weight
Weight gain (%)
264.54
6.78
196.4
-11.23
132.5
1.68
150.12
-15.23
170.92
15.49
160.88
2
190.2
-9.64
95.9
5.94
140.29
2.4
157.84
-4.72
Weight
Weight gain (%)
253.9
2.48
199.8
-9.69
133.43
2.39
143.44
-19
180.96
22.27
151.09
-4.2
183.48
-12.83
99.93
10.39
141.11
3
152.93
-7.68
12
Weight
Weight gain (%)
250.8
1.23
202.08
-8.66
127.52
-2.14
141.83
-19.91
174.3
17.77
158.5
0.49
200.36
-4.81
100.3
10.8
130.55
-4.7
135.57
-18.16
14
Weight
Weight gain (%)
240.42
-2.96
215.68
-2.52
129.47
-0.64
140.86
-20.46
158.42
7.4
167.8
6.39
181.13
-13.94
102.25
12.96
144.3
5.33
163.75
-1.15
Day
Weight (g)
Origanum majorana
80
160
320
221.25 130.31 177.1
Peganum harmala
80
160
320
148
157.72 210.48
Salvia officinalis
80
160
320
90.52
137
165.66
732
Table 6. Hematological parameters of blood of hamsters treated with oils (mg/kg) after 14 day.
Group
Normal value
RBCs
HGB
HCT%
MCHC
WBCs
lymphocyte
Lymphocyte%
Monocyte
Monocyte%
Granulocyte
Granulocyte%
9-1510 g/l
9-15 g/dl
27-45
31-34 g/dl
4-12108 g/l
2-9108 g/l
40-75
ND
0-5%
0.70-6.00
10.0-50.0
control
0
4.9
11.6
42.8
27.1
8.38
3.66
43.7
0.06
0.8
4.66
55.6
Origanum majorana
80
160
320
Peganum harmala
80
160
320
Salvia officinalis
80
160 320
4.58
11.4
37
30.9
4.46
1.35
30.2
0.04
0.8
3.08
68.9
5.52
12.2
45.8
26.5
20.2
2.44
12.1
1.2
5.9
16.6
82
6.8
12.5
43.6
28.7
6.61
2.07
31.3
0.23
3.4
4.32
65.3
5.53
11.9
42.6
28
4.1
0.99
24.3
0.04
0.9
3.07
74.9
4.53
11.2
36.9
30.2
5.3
1.03
19.3
0.05
0.9
4.23
79.8
5.47
11.4
38.1
29.9
4.02
1.22
30.2
0.03
0.8
2.77
68.9
5.41
11.6
39.4
29.5
7.64
3.04
39.8
0.17
2.2
4.42
57.9
6.84
14.7
48.3
30.9
12.8
2.46
19.2
0.11
0.9
10.2
80
6.46
12.8
43.9
29.2
3.06
0.73
23.8
0.03
0.9
2.31
75.3
DISCUSSION
Many herbs, essential oils and species have
demonstrated some inhibitory effect against spoilage
microorganisms in variety of foods (Ellin, 2007). Also,
herbs are used as substances enhancing the taste and
varieties of regular foods. Some herbs are used as meat
additives which have been reported to have bactericidal
or bacteriostatic additives (Dyankova et al., 2009). The
inhibitory effects of herbs are mostly because of their
content of volatile oils (Vazgecer et al., 2004). Many
medicinal plants have been known to synthesize active
secondary metabolites such as phenolic compounds
found in essential oils, with established potent
insecticides and antimicrobial activities (Kambu et al.,
1982). Many research groups screened various plants
extracts as secondary metabolities to detect their
biological activities. Plant extracts have great potential as
antimicrobial compounds against microorganisms. Thus
they can be used in the treatment of infectious disease
caused by resistant microbes. The essential oils of plants
are used as antioxidant, laxatives erosive and in
treatment of skin, sleep, cold, cough, urinary system, and
nervous system disorders (Abo-Ghalia et al., 2004).
This investigation was directed to study the effect of
three essential plant oils on the growth of most potent
proteolytic bacterial species B. cereus, E. coli, S. indica
and S. aureus. All oils were tested for their antimicrobial
activity using microdilution method. The results revealed
that extracts of all plants oils had variations in antibacterial activity against B. cereus, E. coli, S. indica and
S. aureus. It also revealed that P. harmala essential oils
have a highest antibacterial activity against the studied
bacterial species. The plant extracts and the essential
oils of plants exhibited various reduction in the growth
Selim et al.
733
734
Conclusions
In summary, our study demonstrated that O. majorana, P.
harmala and S. officinalis oils seem to be destitute of
toxic effect which could compromise the medicinal use of
these plants in folk medicine. More detailed study in the
future is necessary to clarify exactly the safety of plants
extracts and plants oils for human.
REFERENCES
Abdallah EM, Khalid HE, Al-Khalifa KS (2009). Toxicological
assessement of the oleo-gum resins of Commiphora molmol and
Boswellia papyrifera in rats. J. Med. Plants Res. 3(6):526-532.
Abo-Ghalia HH, Al-Khalifa MT, El-Mokadem AM, Ghanem KA (2004).
Antimicrobial activity of essential oils of some medical plants. N.
Egypt. J. Microbiol. 9: 221-241.
Adams RP (2001). Identification of Essential Oil Components by Gas
Chromatography/ Quadrupole Mass Spectroscopy. Allured, Carol
Stream, IL, USA.
Alma MH, Mavi A, Yildirim A, Digrak M, Hirata T (2003). Screening
chemical composition and in vitro antioxidants and antimicrobial
activities of the essential oils from the Origanum syriacum L, growing
in Turkey. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 26:1725-1729.
Selim et al.
735