Gaston Gelos
Division Chief
Outline
1. What is shadow banking, how has it evolved
and what are common drivers?
2.
shadow
banking
become
2 When
Wh does
d
h d
b
ki activity
ti it b
a risk to financial stability?
3. How has regulation and supervision changed
and
d what
h t ffurther
th measures are lik
likely
l or
necessary?
Benefits
f
Broad:
Narrow:
Greater
on more
G t focus
f
risky entities/activities or
that involve regulatory
arbitrage
Risks
(-) bank-like risks
(-) run risk & contagion
Deposits
Loans
Money
Securitie
es
Banks
Mone
Money
Securities
Loan
ns
Money
y
Securitties
Mone
ey
Borrowers
Loans
S
Securitization
iti ti
Money
Hedge funds
Loans
Mo
oney
Mo
oney
Sec
curities
Securities
Money market
mutual
t l funds
f d
Money
Money
Money
Securities
S
Securities
Lenders1
Money
M
Money
Dealers
Loans
400
300
UK
Euro area
US
Other AE
China
O h EM
Other
200
100
0
2002
2006
2010
2014e
in % banking assets
200
150
100
50
0
2002
2006
2010
2014e
10
11
Shadow banking
g in Asia
Subsectors
Money Market Funds
(ex Japan)
MMFs in
MMF
i Japan,
J
US,
US
Canada
12
13
Shadow banking
g in Asia
Subsectors
Finance Companies
Structured Finance
14
Emerrging
Econo
omies
Adv
vanced
Econ
nomiess
15
16
17
Benefits
Enhancing
access to
credit
Better risk
sharing
tailor
il risk-return
i k
di ib i
distributions
that
h
fit ultimate investors
Improving
market
k t
liquidity
help fixed-income
fixed income market liquidity
as banks reduce presence
18
Risks
Run risk
Agency
problems
Opacity and
complexity
Leverage and
procyclicality
p
y
y
Spillovers
p
Evaluation of risks:
Quantitative or Qualitative Analysis
Ri k S
Risk
Scoring
i iin Ad
Advanced
dE
Economies
i
Ri k S
Risk
Scoring
i iin E
Emerging
i M
Markets
k t
21
Interaction
banks/shadow
banks
Regulatory arbitrage
22
Cross-border Impact?
p
Based on RCGA survey (2014)
Impact on rest
of Asia: mostly
insignificant
Some impact
beyond Asia
from crosscross
border
exposures
p
23
24
25
The figure shows four activity types (A1A4) and three entity types (E1E3). Entity-based regulation that covers only entity type E2 would miss
the migration of, say, activity type A3 from E2 to E1; but that migration would be picked up by activity-based regulation covering A3. Similarly,
activity-based regulation that covers activity type A3 would miss situations in which covered entities (E1E3) migrate to activities, say A2, that
are not covered but have similar economic outcomes.
26
MMF susceptibility
to runs
Securitization
Sec lending and
repo markets
Other shadow
entities
towards
t
d more activity-based
ti it b
d policy
li measures
Data gaps
further identify
y known unknowns across the
whole shadow banking universe
Implementation
monitoring
i i
Making derivatives
markets
k t safer
f
FSB Workstreams
Applicability in Asia
MMF
susceptibility to
runs
Securitization
Other shadow
entities
Monitoring
and data
New ttools
N
l
((regulation+)
g
)
31
32
Macroprudential Framework
Address
y
systemic
stability
risks
No onesize-fits-all
i fit ll
C
Country
t examples
l ffor di
discussion
i
35
Bangladesh
FSAP 2010:
p g
growth in nontraditional banking
g activities
The rapid
in recent years is generating new risks, underlining
the importance of strengthening the regulatory
framework.
Although some of these changes reflect desirable
i
innovation
ti and
d growth
th off th
the fifinancial
i l sector,
t th
they
partly reflect differences in the regulatory and tax
environment
environment.
As MFIs are small, this in itself does not pose risks
y
However,, banks are opening
p
g
to the financial system.
microfinance units. Hence, the border between the
regulated banking sector and the largely unregulated
microfinance sector is increasingly porous.
36
Bangladesh
37
AIV 2014:
Bhutan
Financial service p
providers in Bhutan can be broadly
y
categorized as formal financial institutions (banks and
nonbank financial institutions), informal moneylenders,
and semiformal providers such as NGOs and
cooperatives.
p
and p
pension boards- have
NBFIs -insurance companies
been allowed to engage in retail lending activities.[]
authorities are now developing investment guidelines for
non banks to encourage them to gradually lend less
non-banks
less.
There is no formal microfinance sector in Bhutan,
although several civil society organizations or
intermediaries provide financial services. Informal
creditors dominate the market in communities where
fi
financial
i l institutions
i tit ti
have
h
little
littl presence.
38
Bhutan
39
Cambodia
AIV 2013:
Proliferation of real estate financing from the
shadow banking system adds to overall risks.
risks.
Some
Some real estate developers are reportedly offering
real estate loans at competitive interest rates,
effectively competing with banks.
However, their funding
g sources remain largely
g y
obscure and beyond regulatory and supervisory
oversight.
40
Cambodia
41
Myanmar
Art IV 2014:
By most international standards, Myanmars financial
sector is still small. And the current structure of the
financial ssystem
stem consists of fo
fourr state o
owned
ned banks
banks,
23 private banks, 42 foreign bank representative
offices about 800 branches of banks
offices,
banks, one statestate
owned insurance company, 12 private insurance
companies, 189 microfinance institutions licensed,
and 3 upcoming policy-based banks, impending entry
of foreign banks and a nascent capital market.
Other
O
priorities include developing a plan to reform
f
the state-owned banks and establishing appropriate
regulation of nonbank financial institutions
institutions
42
Nepal
AIV 2014:
As of April 2014, the NRB regulated 30 Class A
commercial banks, 86 Class B development banks,
56 Class C finance companies, and 35 Class D
microfinance banks.
In addition, a very large number (about 17,000) of
credit cooperatives exist outside the NRBs
supervisory
i
perimeter.
i t
The largely unsupervised cooperatives sector is
growing rapidly
rapidly, partly fueled by directed lending
policies, and poses a significant risk to the stability of
the financial system
system.
43
Sri Lanka
44
Sri Lanka
AIV 2014:
There are 24 commercial banks in Sri Lanka and nine
specialized banks. In the NBFI sector, there are 58
firms47 finance companies and 11 specialized leasing
companies.
g the NBFI sector has been more p
prone to
While not large,
weakness.
The CBSL announced in January 2014 a financial sector
consolidation
lid ti plan
l tto reduce
d
th
the number
b off NBFI
NBFIs and
d
create larger banks.
Consolidating NBFIs with a view to building a stronger
capital base may add some resilience to shocks,
potentially generate cost efficiencies, and should also
allow
ll
ffor closer
l
oversight.
i ht
45
Wrapping up
46
THANK YOU