discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/257566695
CITATIONS
READS
16
3 AUTHORS, INCLUDING:
Su Fang Wu
Zhejiang University
23 PUBLICATIONS 255 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, PR China
Institute of Environmental and Municipal Engineering, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou, Henan 450011, PR China
c
Zhejiang Provincial Engineering Research Center of Industrial Boiler and Furnace Flue Gas Pollution Control, Hangzhou 311202, PR China
b
h i g h l i g h t s
g r a p h i c a l a b s t r a c t
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 13 August 2012
Received in revised form 19 November 2012
Accepted 21 November 2012
Available online 29 November 2012
Keywords:
CO2 adsorbent
Nano CaO
Adsorption phase technique
a b s t r a c t
This study describes for the rst time micro-scale hydrolysis has been used in the adsorption phase to
prepare a nano CaO-based CO2 adsorbent with a highly durable sorption capacity. The hydrolysis of
Ti(OC4H9)4 to form TiO2 was used to prepare TiO2-coated nano CaCO3, which was then calcinated to prepare a nano CaO-based CO2 adsorbent with a controlled coating layer. The coating compactness was
dened for the rst time in this study to describe the mole ratio of Ti to Ca on the surface of the nano
CaCO3. The coating compactness and the durability of the sorption capacity of samples with varying
TiO2 content, hydrolysis temperature, and ester concentration were studied in detail. The properties of
the reactive adsorption of the prepared nano CaO-based CO2 adsorbents were tested using a thermogravimetric analyzer. The results showed that, of the conditions tested, the TiO2 content exerts the most
inuence on the durability of the sorption capacity. The nano CaCO3 that was coated with 10 wt.% TiO2
and prepared under 20 C, which has a corresponding coating compactness of 1.0, exhibited a much more
durable CO2 sorption capacity than the other prepared samples.
Crown Copyright 2012 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
The capture of CO2 through the use of a CaO-based adsorbent
plays an important role in the efcient separation of CO2 from
combustion/gasication gases [13] and sorption-enhanced hydrogen production processes [46]. This capture is based on the
reversible carbonation reaction of CaO [7]. CaO is a potential adsorbent because of its high reactive sorption capacity and the
abundance of its natural precursors, such as limestone (CaCO3)
Corresponding author at: Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering,
Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, PR China. Tel.: +86 571 87953138.
E-mail address: wsf@zju.edu.cn (S. Wu).
1385-8947/$ - see front matter Crown Copyright 2012 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2012.11.095
40
2. Experimental
2.1. Reagents and instruments
Table 1
Preparation conditions of samples.
Sample Nos.
10
11
12
13
14
TiO2 content/wt.%
T/C
Ester concentration/wt.%
5
11.5
9.6
6.5
15
9.6
8
15
9.6
10
12.5
9.6
12
14.5
9.6
15
12
9.6
20
12.5
9.6
10
0
9.6
10
20
9.6
10
40
9.6
10
70
9.6
10
22
5
10
22
17.5
41
Ca LMM
Ti LMM
Intensity (a.u.)
Ti2s
Ti2p3/2&1/2
Ca2p3/2&1/2
Ca2s
C1s
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
nTi
;
nCa
nTi
ITi =STi
;
nCa ICa =SCa
where I is the peak area of the XPS test data tting and S is the sensitivity factor, which is related to the element and equipment used
(in this instrument, STi = 1.1 and SCa = 0.71).
2.4. Sorption capacity test method
The cyclic CO2 sorption capacity was measured with a thermogravimetric analyzer. The tests were conducted under carbonation,
with a CO2 partial pressure of 0.02 MPa in N2 at 600 C for 10 min,
and calcination in N2 at atmospheric pressure and 725 C for
10 min. The temperature was increased at a rate of 15 C/min
and decreased at a rate of 40 C/min. The cyclic CO2 sorption capacity tests were also conducted in a xed bed reactor. We used the
reactive sorption capacity to analyze the reaction of CaO with
CO2. The reactive sorption capacity and decay ratio were calculated
according to the following equations:
Decay ratio
SC1 SCn
100%;
SC1
where (SC)1 is the reactive sorption capacity of the rst run and
(SC)n is the reactive sorption capacity of the nth run.
To investigate the effect of the TiO2 content on the cyclic performance, seven samples (from No. 2 to No. 8) with different TiO2
mass fractions of 5%, 6.5%, 8%, 10%, 12%, 15%, and 20% were prepared. The TEM images of several typical samples are shown in
Fig. 4.
As shown in Fig. 4, the more dispersed nano calcium carbonate
particles were lighter in color.1 The formation of the TiO2 layer
darkened the colors of the edges. As the TiO2 content increases,
the thickness and distribution of the dark parts become more obvious. The samples with 5% and 10% TiO2 showed a thin layer and a
partial coating around the edges of the particles. The sample with
20% TiO2 showed a thick and almost complete coating around the
edges of the particles. The thickness of the coating layer ranged
from 4.5 nm to 11.6 nm as the TiO2 content increased from 5% to
20%.
The reactive sorption capacity test results are shown in Fig. 5.
The sample marked 0% was not coated with TiO2. The initial reactive sorption capacity of each sample was high, decayed rapidly in
the initial ve to six cycles, and then decayed slowly. After 30 cycles of carbonationcalcination, the reactive sorption capacity of
most samples remained at a relatively stable value; this was true
for all samples except the samples with 5% and 6.5% TiO2, which
continued to decay. The non-TiO2 coated sample continued to decay with a lower reactive sorption capacity than the other samples,
which indicates that the coating operation improved the durability
of the sorption capacity. A few samples, such as those with 10% and
12% TiO2, showed an increase in the CO2 reactive sorption capacity
after 20 cycles. We conjecture that this phenomenon is caused by
self-reactivation [14,33]. An additional 30 cycles of carbonation
calcination of the 10% TiO2 sample were run after the initial 30 cycles. The sorption capacity was almost stable after the 40th run, as
shown in Fig. 6.
The results of the BET surface area measurements on samples 1
and 5 before and after several runs are shown in Table 2. As shown
in the results, after 12 runs, the surface area and the average pore
size of sample No. 5, which was coated with TiO2, were maintained
at almost constant levels, whereas those of sample No. 1 decreased.
This nding indicates that the TiO2 coating may provide a partition
wall that prevents the agglomeration of the CaO particles and thus
improves the durability of the reaction sorption capacity of the
coated samples.
Fig. 7 shows the effect of the TiO2 content on the sorption
capacity in the 1st and the 30th runs. With increasing TiO2 content,
the sorption capacity of the initial sorbent decreased and that of
the sample in the 30th run rst increased and then decreased. In
the rst run, the increasing content of the coating material led to
a reduction in the relative content of CaO, which reduces the number of CO2 adsorption sites and decreases the CO2 sorption capacity. As the cycles of adsorption and desorption progressed, the
activity of CaO decreased, and thus, the sorption capacity decreased. When the TiO2 content was greater than 8%, the decay ratio was smaller, which meant that the durability was improved.
Taking into account the sorption capacity, a TiO2 content in the
range of 810% was considered to be optimal. Among those values,
after 30 cycles, the sample with 10% TiO2 had the highest sorption
capacity, with a value of 0.404 g of CO2/g of CaO, and the lowest
decay ratio at 28.3%, which results in the best adsorption
1
For interpretation of color in Fig. 4, the reader is referred to the web version of
this article.
42
600
400
300
200
600
400
300
200
100
100
0
340
342
344
346
348
350
352
354
356
358
500
Intensity (a.u.)
Intensity (a.u.)
500
454
456
458
460
462
464
466
468
470
Fig. 4. TEM images of samples with different TiO2 content. (a) Non-TiO2 coated nano CaCO3 (sample No. 1), (b) 5% TiO2 (sample No. 2), (c) 10% TiO2 (sample No. 5), (d) 20%
TiO2 (sample No. 8).
the initial cycles. As the cycles progressed, the impact of the temperature became apparent. The sorption capacities of the samples
prepared under 40 C and 70 C temperature conditions were gradually reduced; these were not as stable as the other three samples,
which were prepared under temperatures in the range of 020 C.
In general, the sorption capacity of the sample prepared under
40 C was higher than that of the sample prepared under 70 C.
Thus, a lower temperature is relatively favorable, and a temperature range of 020 C is optimal.
The reactant concentration of butyl titanate dissolved in the
ethanol solution also had some impact on the adsorption performance of the adsorbent. Fig. 9 shows the CO2 reactive sorption
capacities of the adsorbent samples Nos. 10, 13, and 14, which
were prepared under the different ester concentrations of 5%,
9.6%, and 17.5%, respectively. As the cycles progressed, when the
ester concentration was 17.5%, the sorption capacity gradually
43
0%
6.5%
10%
15%
0.6
5%
8%
12%
20%
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
0
10
15
20
25
1st run
30th run
0.6
0.7
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
30
number of cycles
10
15
20
TiO2 content/%
Fig. 5. CO2 reactive sorption capacity of sample Nos. 18 with different TiO2
content (carbonation: CO2 partial pressure of 0.02 MPa at 600 C for 10 min, and
calcination with an atmospheric pressure in N2 at 725 C for 10 min).
0%TiO2
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
10%TiO2
0.6
Fig. 7. Effect of TiO2 content on sorption capacity of 1st and 30th run.
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0.0
10
20
30
40
50
number of cycles
15
20
25
30
number of cycles
Table 2
BET analytic results of samples 1 and 5 before and after several runs.
5%
9.6%
17.5%
0.6
No. 1
No. 5
No. 1
No. 5
5.90
4.35
3.33
20.76
10.92
10.33
20.80
18.42
16.60
19.14
12.42
13.18
decayed and did not reach a steady state even after 30 cycles. In
contrast, when the ester concentration was relatively low, the
sorption capacity was basically stable after only 10 cycles.
3.3. Compactness and durability
Fresh
After 12 runs
After 20 runs
10
Fig. 8. CO2 reactive sorption capacity of sample Nos. 5, and 912 prepared under
different temperatures varying from 0 C to 70 C.
Sample
60
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
The adsorption performance of the novel adsorbent was correlated with the compactness of the coating layer. The compact factors of the TiO2 coating layers of samples with different adsorption
performances are shown in Table 3.
10
15
20
25
30
number of cycles
Fig. 9. CO2 reactive sorption capacity of sample Nos. 10, and 13,14 prepared under
different ester concentrations of 517.5%.
44
Table 3
The compact factors of TiO2 coating layer under different experimental conditions.
Sample Nos.
C
2
0.81
4
1.31
7
1.52
8
1.89
10
1.03
11
1.09
12
0.77
80
0.6
60
0.5
40
0.4
0.3
decay ratio(%)
0.7
20
0.2
0.1
0.6
0
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
compact factor
Fig. 10. The relationship between compact factor and the 30th sorption capacity
and decay ratio.
The TiO2 content and the compact factor both increased in samples Nos. 2, 4, 7, and 8. It is easy to understand that an increased
TiO2 content indicates that more TiO2 is gathered on the surface
of the nano calcium carbonate. Thus, the relative content of titanium to calcium on the surface was greater. The hydrolysis temperature is critical for the control of the reaction kinetics that
determines the formation rate and the growth pattern of TiO2,
which results in the dispersion of TiO2 on the surface of the nano
calcium carbonate. Higher temperatures were conducive to the
growth of the Ti(OH)4 precipitate crystal, which led to an inferior
dispersion of TiO2 and thus a smaller compact factor.
As shown in Fig. 10, the sorption capacity in the 30th run rst
increases and then decreases with increasing compact factor. A
compact factor in the range of 0.81.3 resulted in a small decay
ratio and a high sorption capacity in the 30th run; this range was
thus regarded as an optimal range of C. When C was less than
0.85, the sorption capacity decayed the most throughout the 30cycles because the coating layer was not dense and the distribution
of the coating material on the surface was not uniform. Thus, this
coating was not able to prevent the agglomeration of the CaCO3
or the sintering of the nano particles. When C was greater than
1.3, the coating layer was uniform and sufciently dense. For
example, the compact factor of sample 8 was 1.89, and the sorption
capacity of this sample gradually stabilized after the rst few initial cycles of decay. However, the increase in the coating material
content led to a reduction in the relative content of CaO, which
greatly reduced the overall sorption capacity of the sorbent.
There were two main factors that affected the compact factor C:
the coating content and the operating conditions, which include
the temperature and the concentration used in the preparation of
the absorbent. The coating content mainly determined the coating
thickness, whereas the operating conditions regulated the coating
uniformity. When the coating material content was constant, both
the sorption capacity and the durability of the sorbent prepared at
a low temperature and a low reactant concentration were improved probably because these conditions reduce the reaction rate,
thus making the coating material on the surface of the nano
calcium carbonate distribute more evenly. In addition, when the
Acknowledgments
The National Natural Science Foundation of China is thanked for
its nancial support (20876142). Kimberly Braches from McMaster
University is also acknowledged for her editing assistance.
Appendix A. Supplementary material
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
the online version, at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2012.11.095.
References
[1] D.A. Green, B.S. Turk, R.P. Gupta, J.W. Portzer, W. McMichael, D. Harrison,
Capture of carbon dioxide from ue gas using solid regenerable sorbents, Int. J.
Environ. Technol. Manage. 4 (2004) 5367.
[2] J.C. Abanades, E.J. Anthony, D.Y. Lu, C. Salvador, D. Alvarez, Capture of CO2 from
combustion gases in a uidized bed of CaO, AIChE J. 50 (2004) 16141622.
[3] H. Gupta, L.S. Fan, Carbonationcalcination cycle using high reactivity calcium
oxide for carbon dioxide separation from ue gas, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 41
(2002) 40354042.
[4] J.R. Hufton, S. Mayorga, S. Sircar, Sorption-enhanced reaction process for
hydrogen production, AIChE J. 45 (1999) 248256.
[5] C. Han, D.P. Harrison, Simultaneous shift reaction and carbon dioxide
separation for the direct production of hydrogen, Chem. Eng. Sci. 49 (1994)
58755883.
[6] S.F. Wu, L.B. Li, Y.Q. Zhu, X.Q. Wang, A micro-sphere catalyst complex with
nano CaCO3 precursor for hydrogen production used in ReSER process, Eng. Sci.
8 (2010) 2226.
[7] A. Silaban, D.P. Harrison, High temperature capture of carbon dioxide:
characteristics of the reversible reaction between CaO(s) and CO2(g), Chem.
Eng. Commun. 137 (1995) 177190.
[8] P.S. Fennell, R. Pacciani, J.S. Dennis, J.F. Davidson, A.N. Hayhurst, The effects of
repeated cycles of calcination and carbonation on a variety of different
limestones, as measured in a hot uidized bed of sand, Energy Fuels 21 (2007)
20722081.
[9] Z.X. Chen, H.S. Song, M. Portillo, C.J. Lim, J.R. Grace, E.J. Anthony, Long-term
calcination/carbonation cycling and thermal pretreatment for CO2 capture by
limestone and dolomite, Energy Fuels 23 (2009) 14371444.
[10] S. Dobner, L. Sterns, R.A. Graff, A.M. Squires, Cyclic calcination and
recarbonation of calcined dolomite, Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev. 16
(1977) 479486.
[11] J.C. Abanades, D. Alvarez, Conversion limits in the reaction of CO2 with lime,
Energy Fuels 17 (2003) 308315.
[12] P. Sun, J.R. Grace, C.J. Lim, E.J. Anthony, The effect of CaO sintering on cyclic CO2
capture in energy systems, AIChE J. 53 (2007) 24322442.
[13] D. Alvarez, J.C. Abanades, Determination of the critical product layer thickness
in the reaction of CaO with CO2, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 44 (2005) 56085615.
[14] S.F. Wu, Y.Q. Zhu, Behavior of CaTiO3/nano-CaO as a CO2 reactive adsorbent,
Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 49 (2010) 27012706.
45
[25] B.V. Materic, C. Sheppard, S.I. Smedley, Effect of repeated steam hydration
reactivation on CaO-based sorbents for CO2 capture, Environ. Sci. Technol. 44
(2010) 94969501.
[26] V. Manovic, E.J. Anthony, Steam reactivation of spent CaO-based sorbent for
multiple CO2 capture cycles, Environ. Sci. Technol. 41 (2007) 14201425.
[27] N.H. Florin, A.T. Harris, Screening CaO-based sorbents for CO2 capture in
biomass gasiers, Energy Fuels 22 (2008) 27342742.
[28] W.Q. Liu, B. Feng, Y.Q. Wu, G.X. Wang, J. Barry, J.C. Diniz da Costa, Synthesis of
sintering-resistant sorbents for CO2 capture, Environ. Sci. Technol. 44 (2010)
30933097.
[29] R. Filitz, A.M. Kierzkowska, M. Broda, C.R. Muller, Highly efcient CO2
sorbents: Development of synthetic, calcium-rich dolomites, Environ. Sci.
Technol. 46 (2012) 559565.
[30] J. Park, K.B. Yi, Effects of preparation method on cyclic stability and CO2
absorption capacity of synthetic CaOMgO absorbent for sorption-enhanced
hydrogen production, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 37 (2012) 95102.
[31] X. Jiang, T. Wang, Preparation of TiO2 nanoparticles on different SiO2 supports
by the adsorption phase technique, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 91 (2008)
4650.
[32] H. Deng, X. Jiang, Preparation of CuOAg/SiO2 nano-composites via adsorption
phase reaction technique, Chin. J. Inorg. Chem. 27 (2011) 119124.
[33] V. Manovic, E.J. Anthony, Thermal activation of CaO-based sorbent and selfreactivation during CO2 capture looping cycles, Environ. Sci. Technol. 42
(2008) 41704174.