5
5
6
6
8
8
10
11
11
12
13
14
15
15
17
17
17
18
18
18
19
19
20
1.2.1.Practical Applications
21
22
22
22
23
23
23
25
26
29
31
31
31
32
32
32
33
3.2.3. Coordination
3.2.4. Concluding Remarks
33
34
34
35
37
37
38
38
39
40
40
41
42
42
43
43
43
45
46
46
48
REFERENCES
49
The Clause
- can occur successfully in certain
slots inside sentences
- is recognizable in all types of spoken
and written language
- cannot stand on its own, it depends
upon a certain context
- there are occasional dependency
relations across clause boundaries
and there are dense bundles of
dependencies among the constituents
of clauses
- can display a wide range of syntactic
and semantic subcategorisations, as
part of complex sentences
5
11
13
15
17
19
21
23
25
MD
The
NG
VG
owl
sang
2. Pattern II: S P A
a. The dancers seem in a good shape.
S
P
A
S
S
NG
MD
VG
H
PG
H
NG
MD
ME
The
dancers
seem
in
good shape
26
NG
MD
The
ME
new
H
chairs
VG
AdvG
are
outside
3. Pattern III: S P CE
a. Leslie wore a pink pyjamas.
S
P
CE
S
S
NG
CE
VG
NG
Leslie
wore
MD
ME
pink
pyjamas
27
NG
H
CI
VG
NG
He
looked
sad
5. Pattern V: S P CE CI
a. She made him her slave.
S
P
CE CI
S
CE
CI
NG
VG
NG
NG
She
made
MD
him
H
her
slave
NG
VG
NG
MD
The
professor
CE1
handed
CE2
NG
MD
them
the
papers
7. Pattern VII : S P CE A
a. Kim put the bag on the table.
S P
CE
A
S
CE
NG
VG
NG
pG
MD
pG
NG
MD
H
Kim
put
the
bag
on
the
table
29
30
31
33
VP
NP
DET
into
the
N
tunnel
V
sing
34
35
VP
Adj
NP2
DET
Adj
PP
N
NP3
DET
the
N
new
maid
put
the
tiny
thing in
her pocket
Figure 2. Phrase-structure tree for (4.a)
36
S
VP
NP
NP
VP
V
PP
P
DET
NP
DET
the
Crook decided on
plane
the
plane
Crook
decided
on
37
NP
DET
DET
house
my
N
toy
a)
b)
3.3.2.1.2. Quantifiers and Quantifier Phrases
Quantifiers (Q) have the general function of indicating the quantity of
elements referred to by the NP. Unlike determiners, they permit various kinds
of modification and therefore have their own phrasal structure. Typical
quantifiers in English are: all, both, half, every, each, any, either, some,
much, enough, several, many, few, little, neither, together with the cardinal
numerals one, two, three, etc.
NP
NP
Q
much
noise
five
a)
balls
b)
N
Q
two
hours
The Syntax of the Simple Sentence
Adj
Adj
large
N
red
apple
AdjP
DET
NP
very
Adj
PP
Adj
proud man
proud
of his success
a)
b)
The type of modification has an influence on the order of noun head and
adjective-phrase modifier within the noun phrase. Only pre-modified adjective
phrases pattern with single adjectives in occurring before the head noun: a
very proud man.
Post-modified adjective phrases must occur after the head: a man
proud of his achievements, a man proud that he has won so easily.
NP
Adj
Conj
that
S
NP
N
proud
The Syntax of the Simple Sentence
he
VP
Aux MV
AdvP
Perf
DET Adv
s
en
win so
easily
39
NP
DET
N
Q
rubber factory
a two-party committee
a)
b)
3.3.2.1.5. Adpositions and Adpositional Phrases
Adpositions are prepositions or postpositions, typically taking NP
complements.
(i) Postpositional phrases are a common form of NP postmodifiers in English:
the cat on the roof, a house without a roof. Some prepositions can occur
alone as postmodifiers: the room underneath.
NP
NP
DET
PP
P
DET
DET
the
NP
cat on
the
a)
roof
40
execution
the
womans
hall of
PP
halls
of residence
The Syntax of the Simple Sentence
41
43
NP
the window
AP
open
For others (Hoekstra 1984) the subject and the predicate form a single
clausal complement of the preposition.
PP
P
NP
with
? S/NP/AP/any P
AP
the window
open
The question mark in place of a category label for the constituent at
issue marks the fact that there is no agreement as to the category status of
this constituent: it could be an S, a bar S', or an AP (or any other phrasal
category), depending on the category of the predicate of the small clause:
e.g. a. with all our students [NP hostages]
b. without the baby [VP demanding attention]
44
NP
VP
V
NP
NP
VP
V
NP
PP
N
Det
Det
P
He
customers off.
put
off
the customers.
He
put
the
3.3.2.3.2. Distribution
There are a wide range of positions in a sentence in which PPs can
appear. Most commonly, they appear as complements, adjuncts and
predicates.
(i) PPs as complements:
- of nouns
e.g. Adam remembers [NP their argument about the photographs].
- of verbs
e.g. Anna [VP decided on Bangor].
- of adjectives
e.g. They were [AP surprised at the suggestion].
- of prepositions
e.g. The baby crawled [PP from inside the box].
(ii) PPs as adjuncts:
- as NP adjuncts:
e.g. Adam remembers [NP their argument before supper.]
- as VP adjuncts:
The Syntax of the Simple Sentence
45
47
1. Analyse the clauses in the text below in terms of traditional syntax. Identify
cases of exceptions to word order.
Elliot Vereker was always coming into and going out of my life. He was the
only man who ever continuously stimulated me to the brink of a nervous
breakdown. Vereker was a writer ;he was gaunt and emaciated from sitting
up all night talking; he wore an admiral s hat which he had stolen from an
admiral. Usually he carried with him an old Gladstone bag filled with burnedout electric-light bulbs which it was his pleasure to throw, unexpectedly,
against the sides of houses and the walls of the rooms.
2. Analyse the sentences in the text below in terms of structural grammar.
Draw the diagramming trees.
The morning of the ninth of April ,1865, dawned beautifully. General Meade
was up with the first streaks of crimson in the eastern sky. The day continued
beautiful. It drew on toward eleven oclock. General Grant was still not up. He
was asleep in his famous old navy hammock, swung high above the floor of
his headquarters bedroom. Headquarters was distressingly disarranged:
papers were strewn on the floor; confidential notes from spies scurried here
and there in the breeze from an open window; the dregs of an overturned
bottle of wine flowed pinkly across an important military map.
3. Analyse in terms of transformational syntax and represent the constituency
structure of the sentences in the text below:
She turned the page; there were only a few lines, to finish the story. It was
getting late. The light in the garden told her that; and the whitening of the
flowers and something grey in the leaves conspired together to rouse in her a
feeling of anxiety. Paul and Minta and Andrew had not come back. She
summoned before her again the little group on the terrace in front of the hall
door, standing looking up into the sky.
48
References
REFERENCES
Aarts, B. 1997. English Syntax and Argumentation, Macmillan Press LTD.
Abney, S.P. 1987. The English Noun Phrase in Its Sentential Aspect,
PhD,diss.,
MIT.
Banta, A. 1996. Descriptive English Syntax, Institutul European, Iai.
Badescu, A., 1984, Gramatica limbii engleze, Ed. Stiintifica si Enciclopedica,
Bucuresti
Bresnan, J., ed. 1982a. The mental representation of grammatical relations.
Cambridge, MA:
MIT Press
Bryant, M.M., 1945.A Functional English Grammar, Boston
Celce- Murcia, Larsen- Freeman, 1999. The Grammar Book. An ESL/EFL
Teachers Course,
Heinle & Heinle Publishers
Chomsky, N. 1957. Syntactic structures. (Janua linguarum 4). Gravenhage:
Mouton.
Chomsky, N. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT
Press.
Chomsky, N.1986a. Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin and Use,
Praeger, New York.
Chomsky, N. 1995. The minimalistic program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cole, P. and Jerrold Sadock, eds. 1977. Syntax and semantics, vol.III:
Grammatical relations.
New York: Academic Press.
Cornilescu, A.. 1986. English Syntax, Volume two, Ediia a II-a, Bucureti.
Cornilescu, A. 1995. Concept of Modern Grammar, A Generative Grammar
Perspective, Editura Universitii Bucureti.
Croft, W. 1991. Syntactic categories and grammatical relations. Chicago and
London: University of Chicago Press.
Croitoru, E. 2002. The English Sentence Structure, Editura Fundaiei
Universitatea Dunrea de Jos din Galai.
Crystal, D. 1995. A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics, Blackwell.
Dima, G. 2003. Outlines of English Syntax, Editura Fundaiei Universitare
Dunrea de Jos Galai
Gazdar, G. 1982. Phrase structure grammar, In Pauline Jacobson and
Geoffrey Pullum, eds. The nature of syntactic representation, 131-86.
Dordrecht: Reidel
Hoekstra, T., 1984, Transitivity, Foris: Dordrecht
Huddleston, R., Pullum, K. G. et al. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the
English Language,
Cambridge University Press
Miller, J. 2002, An Introduction to English Syntax, Edinburgh University Press
Keenan, E. L. 1976b. Towards a universal definition of subject. In Li (1976),
305-33.
Palmer, F. R. 1994. Grammatical roles and relations. Cambridge University
Press.
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. and Svartvik, J. 1972, 1985. A
Comprehensive Grammar of English, Longman, London.
The Syntax of the Simple Sentence
49
References
Radford, A. 1988. Transformational Grammar: a first course. Cambridge
University Press.
Scott, F.S.et al, 1970. English Grammar. A Linguistic Study of its Classes and
Structures, Heinemann Educational, Books LTD. London
Siewierska, A., 2005, Word Order and Linearization in A Concise
Encyclopedia of Syntactic Theories, Brown K., Miller, J., Pergamon
Swan, M., 1989, Practical English Usage, Oxford University Press
erban, D. 1986. English Syntax, Volume One, Ediia a II-a, Bucureti.
Van Riemsdijk, H.C.(1998) 'Head movement and adjacency' NLLT 1
Van Valin, R. Jr. and R. LaPolla. 1997. Syntax: structure, meaning & function.
Cambridge
University Press
Zandvoort, R.W., 1948.A Handbook of English Grammar, Groningen
A Concise Encyclopedia of Grammatical Categories, Elsevier, Amsterdam,
1999.
50