2015; 6:35-42
Oil Crops Biotechnology Lab, Agricultural Genetic Engineering Research Institute (AGERI), Agriculture
Research Center (ARC), Giza, 12619, Egypt. 2Department of Genetics, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo
University, Giza, Egypt.
Canola (Brassica napus L.) is the oilseed crop of cold season countries, yet recently new varieties are being
tested in warmer-climate countries. In Egypt, new varieties have been introduced / tested for adaptation to
Egyptian environment, therefore gaining the interest of workers in the field of oil-crops production. In the
current work, canola var. Pactol, a well adapted variety to Egyptian environment, was tested for regeneration
ability via direct and indirect shoot organogenesis, as the first step for further crop improvement. Hypocotyls
segment were tested on different media; best results for direct shoot organogenesis was achieved on medium
fortified with 0.45 mg/l Thidiazuron + 3.0 mg/l benzyl adenine and 0.1 mg/l Naphthalene acetic acid (88.3%),
with an average shoot number of 10.5 1.23. For indirect shoot organogenesis, (and after an initial incubation of
10 days on 2, 4-dichlorophenoxy acetic acid fortified medium), the best results were obtained on medium
supplemented with 0.15 mg/l Thidiazuron + 1.0 mg/l benzyl adenine and 0.5 mg/l naphthalene acetic acid
(73.75%), with an average shoots of 7.38 0.17. Achieving a reliable regeneration system is a step forward in
production of genetically enhanced dehydration-stress tolerance varieties able to grow in new reclaimed area in
Egypt.
*Corresponding author: Mohamed S. Tawfik, Oil Crops Biotechnology Lab, Agricultural Genetic Engineering Research Institute (AGERI),
Agriculture Research Center (ARC), Giza, 12619, Egypt. E-mail: moh4mon@gmail.com. Phone: +20 10 500 6810. FAX: +20 23 573 1574.
Introduction
35
2015; 6:35-42
36
2015; 6:35-42
Regeneration
Mature seeds of canola var. "Pactol" were
surface sterilized by soaking in 70% (v/v)
ethanol for 1 min, followed by soaking for
another 15 min in 20% commercial Clorox (1.0
% sodium hypochlorite solution) with a drop of
Tween 20 with stirring. Seeds were washed 56 times with sterilized distilled water to ensure
the removal of disinfecting residues. Seeds
were germinated for 5 - 6 days on 1/2 strength
MS medium [41], supplemented with
Gamborg's B5 vitamins [42] + 10.0 g/l sucrose
and 7.0 g/l agar. The pH of this medium and all
subsequent media were adjusted to 5.7,
followed by autoclaving at 121C for 20 min. All
tissue culture materials unless otherwise
mentioned were kept in growth chamber at 25
2C for 16/8hr light/dark photoperiod.
37
2015; 6:35-42
Table 1. Growth regulators combinations of the twenty MS- based shoot regeneration media used for canola var. Pactol shoot formation.
No
Media Name
No
Media Name
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
MS1
MS2
MS3
MS4
MS5
MS6
MS7
MS8
MS9
MS10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
MS11
MS12
MS13
MS14
MS15
MS16
MS17
MS18
MS19
MS20
The experiment was repeated 3 times and each treatment consisted of 4 replicates.
Table 2. Regeneration of canola via direct and indirect shoots production; numbers with the same latter are insignificants.
Shoot No.
0.17 0.10 j
2.00 0.38 h
2.67 0.17 g
5.98 0.51 de
5.50 0.22 de
0.75 0.08 i
8.70 0.23 b
4.70 0.11 de
10.50 1.23 a
7.33 0.49 c
0.08 0.05 j
6.83 0.37 cd
5.33 0.46 de
5.00 0.76 def
4.00 0.76 ef
0.08 0.05 j
1.36 0.46 hi
0.89 0.32 i
1.58 0.24 h
1.71 0.33 h
3.76
Percentage
1.60
20.9
26. 7
58.3
55.0
7.50
69.0
41.8
88.3
66.7
1.00
68.3
46.7
50.0
51.0
1.0
15.0
10.0
15.8
17.1
Shoot No.
0.25 0.12 i
2.13 0.50 e f
2.38 0.01 e
4.88 0.18 c d
5.36 0.30 c
0.63 0.10 h
5.80 0.56 c
3.54 0.50 d
5.75 0.60 c
6.60 0.12 b
0.00 0.00 j
7.38 0.17a
4.38 1.10 cd
5.25 0.60 c
5.25 0.70 c
0.13 0.10 i
1.50 0.08 f
1.54 0.57 f
0.87 0.06 g
1.75 0.47 f
3.27
Percentage
2.50
17.14
23.00
48.75
53.75
6.25
54.20
37.10
57.50
66.25
00.00
73.75
43.75
37.50
52.50
1.25
15.00
17.00
8.75
17.50
Numbers in this table represents mean SE; values followed with similar letters are non significant at p 0.05.
38
2015; 6:35-42
Figure 1. Regeneration in canola var. Pactol via direct-shoot organogenesis; pictures were taken 4 weeks post incubation on different
regeneration media and represents a sample of explant response to treatments.
Figure 2. Regeneration in canola var. Pactol via indirect shoot formation; pictures represents a sample of explant responding to different media
treatments almost 3 weeks post starting of regeneration process (10 days incubation on 2,4-D containing medium +11 days on the different
regeneration media).
39
2015; 6:35-42
Figure 3. Different developmental stages of canola shoots. (a) Vitrified canola shoots, (b) Shoots recovering and elongated on hormone-free
medium, (c) Plantlets of canola after root formation on 1/2 strength MS medium supplemented with IBA, (d) Acclimatization in growth
chamber, (e) Plants in greenhouse, (f) Seed-setting in greenhouse.
40
2015; 6:35-42
References
1. FAO Statistical Yearbook 2013: World food and agriculture.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
Rome
2013.
http://www.fao.org/docrep/018/i3107e/i3107e00.htm.
2. Raymer PL. 2002. Canola: An Emerging Oilseed Crop. Trends
in New Crops and New Uses. pp: 122 126.
3. Masoud S, Noormohamadi Z, Sotodeh M. 2006. Cytogenetic
variability in several canola (Brassica napus) cultivars.
Caryologia. 59:267276.
4. Hassan MB and Shafique FA. 2011. Current situation of edible
vegetable oils and some propositions to curb the oil gap in
Egypt. Nature and Science. 8:1-7.
5. FAOSTAT: Egypt. 2011. Food and Agriculture Organization of
the
United
Nations.
http://faostat.fao.org/site/666/default.aspx.
6. Sharaky A, Atta S, El Hassanein A, Khallaf K. 2007.
Hydrogeochemistry of groundwater in the western nile delta
aquifers, Egypt. 2nd Int Conf Geol Tethys. pp:123.
7. Chinnusamy V, Jagendorf A, Zhu JK. 2005. Understanding and
improving salt tolerance in plants. Crop Sci. 45:437448.
8. Chi G, Bradfield G, Sim G, Pua E. 1990. Effect of AgNO3 and
aminoethoxyvinyl- glycin on in vitro shoot and root
organogenesis from seedling explants of recalcitrant Brassica
genotypes. Plant Cell Rep. 9:195198.
9. Hachey JE, Sharma KK, Moloney MM. 1991. Efficient shoot
regeneration of Brassica campestris using cotyledon explants
cultured in vitro. Plant Cell Rep. 9: 549554.
10. Ono Y, Takahata Y, Kaizuma N. 1994. Effect of genotype on
shoot regeneration from cotyledonary explants of rapseed
(Brassica napus L.). Plant Cell Rep. 14:13-17.
11. Hu Q, Andersen SB, Hansen LN. 1999. Plant regeneration
capacity of mesophyll protoplasts from Brassica napus and
related species. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 59:189196.
12. Phogat SK, Burma PK, Pental D. 2000. High frequency
regeneration of Brassica napus varieties and genetic
transformation of stocks containing fertility restorer genes for
two cytoplasmic male sterility systems. J Plant Biochem
Biotechnol. 9:73-79.
13. Khan MR, Rashid H, Quraishi A. 2002. High frequency shoot
regeneration from hypocotyl of canola (Brassica napus L) cv.
Dunkled. Plant Tissue Cult. 12:131138.
14. Khan MR, Rashid H, Quraishi A. 2002. Effects of various
growth regulators on callus formation and regeneration in
Brassica napus cv. Oscar. Pakistan J Biol Sci. 5:693695.
15. Jonoubi P, Mousavi A, Majd A. 2004. Improved Brassica napus
L. regeneration from hypocotyls using thidiazuron and
benzyladenine as cytokinin sources. Pakistan J Bot. 36:321
329.
16. Akasaka-Kennedy Y, Yoshida H, Takahata Y. 2005. Efficient
plant regeneration from leaves of rapeseed (Brassica napus
L.): influence of AgNO3 and genotype. Plant Cell Rep. 24:649654.
17. Moghaieb RA, El-awady MA, El-Mergawy RG, Youssef SS, ElSharkawy MA. 2006. A reproducible protocol for regeneration
and transformation in canola (Brassica napus L.). African J
Biotechnol. 5:143148.
18. Kamal BK, Lllich KG, Asadollah A. 2007. Effects of genotype,
explant type, and nutrient medium components on canola
(Brassica napus L.) shoot in vitro organogenesis. African J
Biotechnol. 6:861-867.
19. Ben-Ghnaya A, Charles G, Branchard M. 2008. Rapid shoot
regeneration from thin cell layer explants excised from
Acknowledgement
We would like to thank Professor Taymour
Naser El-Din, and Professor Hanayia El_Itriby for
their critical review of the manuscript.
41
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
2015; 6:35-42
42