La poltica exterior de los Estados Unidos de Norteamrica
examinada bajo la teora realista de las relaciones internacionales
2. Estructura del trabajo
Sumario
Introduccin
Breve definicin de la teora realista en las relaciones
internacionales
Breve descripcin de las relaciones internacionales de los
Estados Unidos a travs del siglo XX y dos dcadas del siglo XXI
Anlisis de las relaciones internacionales de Estados Unidos en
el siglo XXI a travs de la teora realista o Anlisis de los intereses econmicos o Anlisis de los intereses polticos
Comparacin de la posicin realista e idealista de los Estados
Unidos en sus relaciones internacionales
Conclusin
Bibliografa
3. Bibliografa a. En ingls:
Worldviews in Foreign Policy: Realism, Liberalism, and
External Conflict o Abstract: International relations studies have been unable to determine whether realist or liberal theories better fit state behavior in various situations, possibly because these studies have attributed motive and action to the states rather than to the decision-makers within them. This article develops a new, more direct approach to
resolving this problem. Hypotheses were tested regarding
conditions under which decision-makers are likely to articulate a problem representation consistent with liberal or realist elements of a worldview. This was done by content analysis of statements about 36 foreign conflicts by the governments of three 'bystander' nations-the United States, Canada, and India-over a 16-year period. The findings indicate that systemic and situational factors are far more important than domestic factors. States tend to represent wars in congruence with liberalism primarily when their security is already assured by another power or when the conflict does not involve allies, rivals, or fellow democracies. Thus, most of the expectations of realism are supported at the psychological level. o Mowle, T. (2003). Worldviews in Foreign Policy: Realism, Liberalism, and External Conflict. Political Psychology, 24(3), 561-592. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3792326
Obama's Foreign Policy: "Smart Power," Realism and
Cynicism o Abstract: This article reviews the foreign policy of the Obama administration with a special focus on the Middle East. It shows the gap between the lofty rhetoric of the President, a great orator, and the decisions taken by the Administration. This gap is the inevitable result of the normal play of forces in the decision-making process involving many actors and the interplay of domestic policies and foreign policy. The author argues that if Obama's foreign policy is analyzed in electoral and domestic terms then it is quite wrong to argue, as some have done, that it is dumb. Smart in electoral terms, however, does not necessarily mean smart on the international stage. o Guerlain, P. (2014). Obama's foreign policy: "smart power," realism and cynicism. Society, 51(5), 482-491. doi:http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.ulima.edu.pe/10.1007/s12115 -014-9814-x
Obama, the foreign policy realist
o Abstract: There are many (I'm among them) who see [Obama] primarily as a foreign policy realist. Especially after our adventures in Iraq, realism looks a whole lot better than it once did. I say this as someone who still thinks that the U.S. needs to stand up for democratic values and human rights, but also sees military overreach
as a grave danger to our interests and long-term strength.
The principal defense of Obama's stewardship rests on the idea that, despite some miscues, his realism about what military power can and can't achieve has recalibrated America's approach, moving it in the right direction. A useful place to start this discussion is "The Realist Persuasion, Richard K. Betts' article in the 30th anniversary issue of The National Interest, realism's premier intellectual outpost. Betts, a Columbia University scholar, argues that realists "focus more on results than on motives and are more attuned to how often good motives can produce tragic results. While idealistic liberals and conservatives alike are often eager to "support the righteous and fight the villainous, realists insist that the actual choices we face are "often between greater and lesser evils. o Dionne, E. J. (2015, Aug 31). Obama, the foreign policy realist. Charleston Gazette - Mail Retrieved from http://fresno.ulima.edu.pe/ss_bd00102.nsf/RecursoReferi do?OpenForm&id=PROQUEST41716&url=/docview/1708216761?accountid=45277
Liberalism in a Realist World: International Relations as
an American Scholarly Tradition o Abstract: The study of international relations (IR) is a worldwide pursuit with each country having its own theoretical orientations, preoccupations and debates. Beginning in the early twentieth century, the US created its own scholarly traditions of IR. Eventually, IR became an American social science with the US becoming the epicenter for a worldwide IR community engaged in a set of research programs and theoretical debates. The discipline of IR emerged in the US at a time when it was the worlds most powerful state and a liberal great power caught in a struggle with illiberal rivals. This context ensured that the American theoretical debates would be built around both power and liberal ideals. Over the decades, the two grand projects of realism and liberalism struggled to define the agenda of IR in the US. These traditions have evolved as they attempted to make sense of contemporary developments, speak to strategic position of the US and its foreign policy, as well as deal with the changing fashions and standards of social science. The rationalist formulations of realism and liberalism sparked reactions and constructivism has arisen to offer counterpoints to the rational choice theory.
o Ikenberry, G., 2009. Liberalism in a Realist World:
International Relations as an American Scholarly Tradition, International Studies, 46(1, 2), pp.203-219. b. En espaol:
EL CONCEPTO DE REALISMO POLITICO - Captulo
Primero: En torno a la nocin de realismo poltico o Sumario: Este captulo tiene por propsito esbozar una nocin de realismo poltico. Para cumplir con tal meta partir bosquejando, de manera compendiada, la genealoga del objeto de estudio desde la antigedad clsica hasta mediados del siglo xx. En seguida, someter a anlisis uno de los ms conocidos intentos que se han llevado a cabo para disipar la vaguedad conceptual de la expresin realpolitik : el de Hans Morgenthau y sus clebres seis principios del realismo poltico; despus identificar las fisuras que tiene el planteamiento de Morgenthau. Finalmente, propondr algunas ideas para configurar un concepto de realismo poltico. o Oro Tapia, Luis R.. El concepto de realismo poltico. Santiago de Chile, CL: RIL editores, 2013. ProQuest ebrary. Web. 3 July 2016. Copyright 2013. RIL editores. All rights reserved.
La poltica exterior de Estados Unidos hacia Amrica Latina
en el periodo 2001 al 2014 o Sumario: El artculo analiza el comportamiento de Estados Unidos, en especial su posicin de potencia internacional para el mantenimiento del orden y la seguridad internacional durante la transicin entre el gobierno de George Bush y Barack Obama. La tradicin poltica seala que ste debe mantener una posicin firme con el propsito de salvaguardar un sistema internacional en equilibrio. Sin embargo, dos teoras resultan enfrentadas a la hora de resolver un dilema de caractersticas internacionales. Por un lado, Mearsheimer, terico del realismo ofensivo, propone una actitud de los Estados siempre en competencia, debido a un sistema internacional en desequilibrio; pero, por otro lado, la tendencia liberal de Ikemberry seala que el orden internacional liberal, propuesto por Estados Unidos, no debe estar ceido a un esquema de competencia radical sino a todo lo contrario, es decir, a un espacio de cooperacin internacional que reduzca la tensin internacional. Por esta va Estados Unidos podra fijar la ruta con Amrica Latina.
o Muoz Snchez, O. A., & Vieco Maya, L. E. (2015). La
politica exterior de estados unidos hacia america latina en el periodo 2001 al 2014. Analecta Poltica, 5(8) Retrieved from http://fresno.ulima.edu.pe/ss_bd00102.nsf/RecursoReferido? OpenForm&id=PROQUEST41716&url=/docview/1667366349?accountid=45277
Ideales democrticos, religin y el destino manifiesto en la
poltica exterior de los Estados Unidos o La poltica exterior de los Estados Unidos a pesar de sus orgenes idealistas, se define, de manera usual, como realista. Sin embargo, ese idealismo siempre est presente en el manejo de sus asuntos internacionales. Desde el Mensaje de despedida del presidente Washington, en 1796, hasta la intervencin en Irak en 2003, los dirigentes norteamericanos han jugado un juego doble entre el idealismo y sus modelos democrticos, y el realismo y sus intereses puntuales. Intereses que pueden ser estratgicos, militares y econmicos, pero que a pesar de su peso en los procesos de formulacin y legitimacin de polticas internacionales, se encuentran sumisos a los ideales democrticos. o Aya Smitmans, M. T. (2007). Ideales democraticos, religion y el destino manifesto en la politica exterior de los Estados Unidos. Observatorio de Analisis de los Sistemas Internacionales [OASIS], (12), 143+. Retrieved from http://go.galegroup.com.ezproxy.ulima.edu.pe/ps/i.do? id=GALE %7CA363237258&sid=summon&v=2.1&u=ulima&it=r&p=IF ME&sw=w&asid=2c91b26f8108b19020a446600625afd2
LA POLTICA EXTERIOR DE LOS ESTADOS UNIDOS
DE NORTEAMRICA EXAMINADA BAJO LA TEORA REALISTA DE LAS RELACIONES INTERNACIONALES
Rodrigo Alonso Taipe Paredes
Crculo de Investigacin de Derecho Internacional 3 de jul. de 2016