From:

To:
Bcc:
Subject:
Date:

Jamie Leigh Cramer

"Cory Rymal"
"alizreik@lowcost-rx.com"
RE: Visitation this weekend
Wednesday, May 25, 2016 12:27:00 PM

Cory,
I have not provided my information to you because I do not & did not agree to the revised order Mr.
Johnson did inform everyone including the judge I did not agree to the revisions. Therefore until the
Order is signed and filed by the Judge and clerk of court the final agreement is not in effect. I have
mailed Missy Brown requesting the transcript. I have filed a motion and your attorney will be getting a
copy in the mail. Until I have agreed to the final revised order Judge Peter Fudges order is still standing.
Therefore your visits are supervised by someone of my choice.
Do to your attorney knowing and understanding the law I am perplexed to why you would think I am
following an order I did not agree upon. I assumed you were properly informed and knew there would be
no visit under the new agreement. Even a signed but unfiled order is still unenforceable. That is
because the order does not become valid until it is actually filed with the clerks office. An order is not
final until it is entered by the clerk of court; and until the order or judgment is entered by the clerk of the
court, the judge retains control of the case. Bowman v. Richland Meml Hosp., 335 S.C. 88, 91, 515
S.E.2d 259, 260 (Ct.App.1999) (citation omitted).
On June 2nd 2016 on a Thursday you may come and exercise your 5 hours and I will properly inform you
and your attorney of the therapeutic setting and supervisor(s) of choice. If you have any questions
please do not hesitate to ask. Also you will not be given my address for future pick-ups but rather we
can meet in a public place.
Jamie Leigh Cramer
From: Cory Rymal [mailto:cory@largo-crhomes.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2016 10:09 AM
To: Jamie Leigh Cramer
Subject: Visitation this weekend

Good Morning Jamie,

I would REALLY appreciate if you would contact me just to let me know your phone number
and home address so I can pick up London this weekend.
Rachael and I will be arriving tomorrow evening and will pick up London Friday morning at
whatever time works best for you. We leave Michigan on Sunday at 5:00 pm.
I am trying to begin this co-parenting relationship so that we can both be best for our child, but
it would really help if you'd be willing to begin this process with me.
Please e-mail or give me a call back (843-540-5901) so we can talk about visitation, Skype
schedule, and us moving forward with raising London together.
Thanks.

-PLEASE NOTE NEW EMAIL ADDRESS

Cory Rymal
Contract Administrator
48C Pennington Drive
Bluffton, SC 29910
Office: (843) 815-6622

From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:

jamieleigh@prestigemedgroup.com
Leanne Eddy
tdjohnson1@hargray.com
RE: FW: Rymal v Cramer proposed order
Friday, May 13, 2016 12:12:38 PM

The order does NOT meet (my) approval. This is not what was discussed at the
hearing. I am requesting a copy of the minute order from the file. Once you receive
the file please send me a copy for my review.
Thank you
Jamie L. Cramer
Prestige Medical Group
7940 N. Lilley Rd.
Suite A-110
Canton, MI 48187
313.879.5047313.879.5047 (l)
888.726.0494 (f)

-------- Original Message -------Subject: FW: Rymal v Cramer proposed order

From: "Leanne Eddy" <leanne@johnsonslawoffice.com>
Date: Thu, May 12, 2016 4:34 pm
To: "'Bree Kennedy'" <bree@kennedyblackshire.com>
Cc: <jamieleigh@prestigemedgroup.com>, "Tom Johnson"
<tdjohnson1@hargray.com>

-----Original Message----From: margaret@margaretsday.com [mailto:margaret@margaretsday.com]

Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2016 11:39 AM
To: tdjohnson1@hargray.com; leanne@johnsonslawoffice.com
Cc: Addison Fender <addison@fenderlawfirm.net>; Tracy Fender
<tracy@fenderlawfirm.net>
Subject: Rymal v Cramer proposed order
Gentlemen and ladies,
Please see attached the latest revised order for Rymal v Cramer which incorporates
the Guardian's requested changes and the proposed provision regarding the
evaluation. If this order meets your approval, please inform me so that I may
forward it to Judge Smoak for signature.
Thank you,
Molly Day
Margaret S. Day, Esquire
Law Office of Margaret S. Day, LLC
Post Office Box 763
Bluffton, South Carolina 29910

To: tdjohnson1@hargray.com
Cc: leanne@johnsonslawoffice.com; alizreik@lowcost-rx.com;
shanigan@gmail.com
Subject: a few concerns

We should get a copy of the transcript & please let me know when you have the transcript.. I
am not paying for my test when I have already done 2 full evaluations. The plaintiff is
requesting so the evaluation so he can pay for it. I am most certainly not agreeing to pay Dr.
Harari either. This is just an example of the many things I do not agree upon. Im sure you are
in agreement with me considering the fact I DID not agree with anything that took place on
Monday but rather boxed in and made to feel my only option I had and a father about to have
a heart attack crying and begging me to agree. I am refusing their non-sense revised
proposal. I am not agreeing or allowing them to continue with their merit-less requests. This is
a mockery of the court room allowing incestuous pedophile psychopaths to use it as their
playground to cover up the abuse on my daughter. You let Ms. Day and the GAL know this is
not Burger King. They have really crossed the line. Another psychological evaluation makes
no sense they didn't listen to the first one or second one writing, whatever Addison fender or
molly day wanted to say or write they've done anyways and still failed at trying to make me
look crazy. They're every attempt to thwart investigations and throw it on me have succeeded
I have all phone records so there's undisputable evidence, however I just want to know why
everyone is expecting me to agree versus give me advice to take out the non-sense they
added? If the plaintiff and GAL are making revisions then I am requesting we add the plaintiff
undergoes the penile plethysmograph test and the Abel Assessment. I would like to request
the GAL take a 10 panel urine, hair follicle and blood test due to his outlandish behavior and
learning he was in drug and alcohol treatment. I would like the GAL to take a competency test
as well due to his decisions allowing the 3 year old go to a bathroom unsupervised ,
disobeying direct orders by the therapist and breaking the court order along with assisting the
plaintiff in breaking the court order. Id like to know if Mr. Fender just broke the law because
he feels hes above it and acted biased dismissing the childs CLEAR FULL DISCLOSURE ,
was he on drugs allowing this or is he incompetent or suffering from mental illness?? All
evidence has not been presented to the court and my every attempt to get the judge to see
the evidence has been thwarted as even Ms. Bostic has had interesting excuses to why she
could not bring the motions to the to the judge, file an emergency hearing or change non
hearing to hearing. I just want to know what kind of judicial system is running here? The
plaintiff would like to take his visitation on May 26th however the proposed order is not agreed
upon. Please let me know how we are to proceed after we have the transcript. I have emailed
Leanne letting her know last night not to do anything until I had time to look over everything
but I have yet to get a response from anyone. Please confirm everyone is aware I do not
agree on the proposed order because I have not heard from anyone.

With Kind Regards,

Jamie Leigh Cramer

Call
Send SMS
Call from mobile
Add to Skype

Date: Fri, May 13, 2016 2:06 pm

To: "'Jamie Leigh Cramer'" <jamieleigh@prestigemedgroup.com>

Hi Jamie:

Mr. Johnson is extremely busy today preparing for trial on Monday,

as well as some other urgent matters that have arisen throughout
the day, so he has not seen your email from last night, nor
todays.

When Tom instructs me to order the hearing transcript, I will do so.

With kind regards,

Leanne

Leanne M. Eddy
Paralegal
Law Office of Darrell Thomas Johnson, Jr., LLC
Post Office Box 1125 Hardeeville, South Carolina 29927

843-784-2142
843-784-2142
843-784-5770 (facsimile)

CONFIDENTIAL & PRIVILEGED:

Unless otherwise indicated or obvious from the nature of the above
communication, the information contained herein may be an
attorney-client privileged and confidential information/work
product. The communication is intended for the use of the
individual or entity named above. If the reader of this transmission
is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is
strictly prohibited.

If you have received this communication in error or are not sure

whether it is privileged, please immediately notify us by return email and destroy any copies, electronic, paper or otherwise, which
you may have of this communication.

From: Jamie Leigh Cramer

[mailto:jamieleigh@prestigemedgroup.com]
Sent: Friday, May 13, 2016 1:49 PM

From:
To:
Subject:
Date:

Jamie Leigh Cramer

"Tom Johnson"
RE: a few concerns
Friday, May 13, 2016 4:14:54 PM

I appreciate that advice. I will inform him until the court order is signed and filed then he can give
his 2 weeks notice. Does this sound fine?

Thank you so much , I really appreciate it

From: Tom Johnson [mailto:tdjohnson1@hargray.com]
Sent: Friday, May 13, 2016 3:41 PM
To: jamieleigh@prestigemedgroup.com
Subject: RE: a few concerns

Jamie:

Personally, I would take the position that until an Order is signed and filed, I have the child(ren) and
let this play out as long as it takes. Like I said earlier, Tom has not even seen any of the emails
today and has not been in contact with Ms. Day. I will keep you apprised of any matters that
transpire.

Leanne

From: jamieleigh@prestigemedgroup.com [mailto:jamieleigh@prestigemedgroup.com]

Sent: Friday, May 13, 2016 2:42 PM
To: Tom Johnson <tdjohnson1@hargray.com>
Cc: alizreik@lowcost-rx.com
Subject: RE: a few concerns

Thank you for your response. Please confirm the order will not be sent to Judge
Smoak until we come to an agreement. Also please tell me how to proceed in regard
to the plaintiff and his proposal date for visitation due to a signed but unfiled order is
still unenforceable because the order does not become valid until it is actually filed
with the clerk's office. "An order is not final until it is entered by the clerk of court; and
until the order or judgment is entered by the clerk of the court, the judge retains
control of the case." Bowman v. Richland Mem'l Hosp., 335 S.C. 88, 91, 515 S.E.2d
259, 260 (Ct.App.1999) (citation omitted)

Please let me know how to proceed.

With Kind Regards,

Jamie Leigh Cramer

Even a signed but unfiled order is still unenforceable. That is because the order does
not become valid until it is actually filed with the clerks office. An order is not final
until it is entered by the clerk of court; and until the order or judgment is entered by
the clerk of the court, the judge retains control of the case. Bowman v. Richland
Meml Hosp., 335 S.C. 88, 91, 515 S.E.2d 259, 260 (Ct.App.1999) (citation omitted).

- See more at: http://www.gregoryforman.com/blog/2013/10/when-does-a-judgesruling-become-a-valid-order/#sthash.QJhzY9pK.dpuf

Even a signed but unfiled order is still unenforceable. That is because the order does
not become valid until it is actually filed with the clerks office. An order is not final
until it is entered by the clerk of court; and until the order or judgment is entered by
the clerk of the court, the judge retains control of the case. Bowman v. Richland
Meml Hosp., 335 S.C. 88, 91, 515 S.E.2d 259, 260 (Ct.App.1999) (citation omitted).
- See more at: http://www.gregoryforman.com/blog/2013/10/when-does-a-judgesruling-become-a-valid-order/#sthash.QJhzY9pK.dpuf
Even a signed but unfiled order is still unenforceable. That is because the order does
not become valid until it is actually filed with the clerks office. An order is not final
until it is entered by the clerk of court; and until the order or judgment is entered by
the clerk of the court, the judge retains control of the case. Bowman v. Richland
Meml Hosp., 335 S.C. 88, 91, 515 S.E.2d 259, 260 (Ct.App.1999) (citation omitted).
- See more at: http://www.gregoryforman.com/blog/2013/10/when-does-a-judgesruling-become-a-valid-order/#sthash.QJhzY9pK.dpuf
Even a signed but unfiled order is still unenforceable. That is because the order does
not become valid until it is actually filed with the clerks office. An order is not final
until it is entered by the clerk of court; and until the order or judgment is entered by
the clerk of the court, the judge retains control of the case. Bowman v. Richland
Meml Hosp., 335 S.C. 88, 91, 515 S.E.2d 259, 260 (Ct.App.1999) (citation omitted).
- See more at: http://www.gregoryforman.com/blog/2013/10/when-does-a-judgesruling-become-a-valid-order/#sthash.QJhzY9pK.dpuf
Even a signed but unfiled order is still unenforceable. That is because the order does
not become valid until it is actually filed with the clerks office. An order is not final
until it is entered by the clerk of court; and until the order or judgment is entered by
the clerk of the court, the judge retains control of the case. Bowman v. Richland
Meml Hosp., 335 S.C. 88, 91, 515 S.E.2d 259, 260 (Ct.App.1999) (citation omitted).
- See more at: http://www.gregoryforman.com/blog/2013/10/when-does-a-judgesruling-become-a-valid-order/#sthash.QJhzY9pK.dpuf

Jamie L. Cramer
Prestige Medical Group
7940 N. Lilley Rd.
Suite A-110
Canton, MI 48187

313.879.5047
888.726.0494 (f)

313.879.5047 (l)

-------- Original Message -------Subject: RE: a few concerns

From: "Tom Johnson" <tdjohnson1@hargray.com>

From:
To:
Subject:
Date:

Tom Johnson
"Jamie Leigh Cramer"
RE: a few concerns
Friday, May 13, 2016 5:30:25 PM

What specifically did you not tell the Judge you agreed to???

Tom

From:
To:
Subject:
Date:

jamieleigh@prestigemedgroup.com
Tom Johnson
Re: a few concerns
Friday, May 13, 2016 8:00:23 PM

Mr. Johnson ,
There are many things added into this order that was not discussed nor agreed upon. I will need a copy of the
transcript but in the event you cannot obtain a copy I will contact the court Monday regarding the transcript. After I
review the transcript I will then provide the changes to your office . Per example , I will not be paying for another
evaluation. They are requesting it and doctor shopping. I will not be paying Dr. Hariri either. I am done jumping
through hoops and complying to all their ridiculous demands. They filed a frivolous litigation and I will not ever be
paying for any more tests at their requests. My rights have been violated in everyway and the law has been broken
far too much to count. They have done nothing but take me for a fool insulting my intelligence , motherhood and
character while making my children suffer through the process. Enough is enough about their revisions. I do not
approve until I have the transcript in hand.

I will not approve not negotiate until I have the transcript. As a man representing me and my best interests Believe
you can understand why it is I make such a request.

I look forward to your prompt reply if you will be obtaining the transcript or if I need to.
A Blind man can see what's taking place here but this is a test of moral character Mr. Johnson that's as far as I can
say
Good Day Sir

------ Original message-----From: Tom Johnson

Date: Fri, May 13, 2016 5:30 PM
To: 'Jamie Leigh Cramer';
Cc:
Subject:RE: a few concerns

What specifically did you not tell the Judge you agreed to???

Tom