Lampiran 4.

Analisis statistik
Analisis Univariat
Case Processing Summary
Cases

Usia 31-40
tahun

Valid
N

Missing
Percent

Total

Percent

Percent

GDS

30,4%

16

69,6%

23

100,0%

Kadar Asam urat

10,1%

62

89,9%

69

100,0%

Descriptives

Usia 31-40 tahun

GDS

Mean

Statistic
223,1429

95% Confidence Interval for

Lower Bound

142,6398

Mean

Upper Bound

303,6459

5% Trimmed Mean

223,2698

Median

237,0000

Variance

7576,810

Std. Deviation

87,04487

Minimum

120,00

Maximum

324,00

Range

204,00

Interquartile Range

178,00

Skewness
Kurtosis

Std. Error
32,89987

-,094

,794

-2,310

1,587

Descriptives

Usia 31-40 tahun

Statistic

Kadar asam Mean

urat

6,3000

95% Confidence Interval for

Lower Bound

4,6242

Mean

Upper Bound

7,9758

5% Trimmed Mean

6,2889

Median

6,0000

Variance

3,283

Std. Deviation

Std. Error
,68487

1,81200

Minimum

4,40

Maximum

8,40

Range

4,00

Interquartile Range

3,90

Skewness

,181

,794

-2,355

1,587

Kurtosis
Case Processing Summary
Cases

Usia 41-50
tahun

Valid
N

Missing
Percent

Total

Percent

Percent

GDS

23

100,0%

,0%

23

100,0%

Kadar asam

23

33,3%

46

66,7%

69

100,0%

urat

Descriptives

Usia 41-50 tahun

GDS

Mean

Statistic
234,9130

95% Confidence Interval for

Lower Bound

195,4618

Mean

Upper Bound

274,3643

5% Trimmed Mean

234,5749

Median

260,0000

Variance

8323,083

Std. Deviation

91,23093

Minimum

72,00

Maximum

412,00

Range

340,00

Interquartile Range

154,00

Std. Error
19,02296

Skewness

-,242

,481

Kurtosis

-,857

,935

Descriptives

Usia 41-50 tahun

Kadar

Mean

Statistic
8,8913

95% Confidence Interval for

Lower Bound

7,9718

Mean

Upper Bound

9,8108

5% Trimmed Mean

8,7220

Median

8,5000

Variance

4,522

Std. Deviation

Std. Error
,44339

2,12644

Minimum

6,00

Maximum

15,00

Range

9,00

Interquartile Range

2,10

Skewness

1,477

,481

Kurtosis

2,631

,935

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Usia 51-60
tahun

Valid
N

Missing
Percent

Total

Percent

Percent

GDS

22

100,0%

,0%

22

100,0%

Kadarasamurat

22

100,0%

,0%

22

100,0%

Descriptives

Usia 51-60 tahun

GDS

Mean

Std.
Statistic

Error

262,5000 19,746
20

95% Confidence

Lower Bound

221,4355

Interval for Mean

Upper Bound

303,5645

5% Trimmed Mean

264,2020

Median

279,5000

Variance

8578,071

Std. Deviation

92,61788

Minimum

68,00

Maximum

428,00

Range

360,00

Interquartile Range

104,50

Skewness
Kurtosis

-,534

,491

,038

,953

Kadarasamurat

Mean

8,3318

95% Confidence Interval for

Lower Bound

7,1192

Mean

Upper Bound

9,5445

5% Trimmed Mean

8,1162

Median

8,2000

Variance

7,480

Std. Deviation

,58311

2,73503

Minimum

3,80

Maximum

16,90

Range

13,10

Interquartile Range

2,32

Skewness

1,602

,491

Kurtosis

4,177

,953

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Usia >60 tahun

Valid
N

Missing
Percent

Total

Percent

Percent

GDS

17

77,3%

22,7%

22

100,0%

Kadarasamurat

17

77,3%

22,7%

22

100,0%

Descriptives

Usia >60 tahun

GDS

Kadarasamurat

Statistic

Mean

Std. Error

247,0588

95% Confidence Interval for

Lower Bound

206,5677

Mean

Upper Bound

287,5500

5% Trimmed Mean

252,1209

Median

280,0000

Variance

6202,059

Std. Deviation

78,75315

Minimum

73,00

Maximum

330,00

Range

257,00

Interquartile Range

136,00

19,10044

Skewness

-,908

,550

Kurtosis

-,251

1,063

7,1588

,66011

Mean
95% Confidence Interval for

Lower Bound

5,7595

Mean

Upper Bound

8,5582

5% Trimmed Mean

7,0042

Median

6,5000

Variance

7,408

Std. Deviation

2,72169

Minimum

3,50

Maximum

13,60

Range

10,10

Interquartile Range

3,95

Skewness

,779

,550

Kurtosis

,375

1,063

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Perempuan

Valid
N

Missing
Percent

Total

Percent

Percent

GDS

48

100,0%

,0%

48

100,0%

Kadarasamurat

48

100,0%

,0%

48

100,0%

Descriptives

JK Perempuan
GDS

Kadarasamurat

Statistic

Mean

Std. Error

241,1250

95% Confidence Interval for

Lower Bound

215,5001

Mean

Upper Bound

266,7499

5% Trimmed Mean

241,9398

Median

263,5000

Variance

7787,899

Std. Deviation

88,24907

Minimum

68,00

Maximum

428,00

Range

360,00

Interquartile Range

151,50

12,73766

Skewness

-,451

,343

Kurtosis

-,552

,674

7,9083

,40868

Mean
95% Confidence Interval for

Lower Bound

7,0862

Mean

Upper Bound

8,7305

5% Trimmed Mean

7,7157

Median

8,1000

Variance

8,017

Std. Deviation

2,83142

Minimum

3,50

Maximum

16,90

Range

13,40

Interquartile Range

3,02

Skewness

1,019

,343

Kurtosis

1,728

,674

Case Processing Summary

Cases

JK Laki

Valid
N

Missing
Percent

Total

Percent

Percent

GDS

21

43,8%

27

56,3%

48

100,0%

Kadarasamurat

21

43,8%

27

56,3%

48

100,0%

Descriptives

JK Laki-laki
GDS

Kadarasamurat

Statistic

Mean

256,9524

95% Confidence Interval for

Lower Bound

217,5994

Mean

Upper Bound

296,3054

5% Trimmed Mean

256,7407

Median

285,0000

Variance

7474,148

Std. Deviation

86,45315

Minimum

108,00

Maximum

412,00

Range

304,00

Interquartile Range

139,50

Std. Error
18,86562

Skewness

-,331

,501

Kurtosis

-,837

,972

8,2857

,40481

Mean
95% Confidence Interval for

Lower Bound

7,4413

Mean

Upper Bound

9,1301

5% Trimmed Mean

8,1241

Median

8,2000

Variance

3,441

Std. Deviation

1,85507

Minimum

6,00

Maximum

13,60

Range

7,60

Interquartile Range

2,20

Skewness

1,170

,501

Kurtosis

2,116

,972

Jenis kelamin-Hiperurisemia (Uji Koefisien kontingensi + Risk factor)

Case Processing Summary

Cases
Valid
N

Missing
Percent

Jeniskelamin *

69

97,2%

Total

Percent
2

2,8%

Percent
71

100,0%

Hiperurisemia4

Jeniskelamin * Hiperurisemia4 Crosstabulation

Hiperurisemia4
tidak
Jeniskelamin

Laki-laki

ya

Count

18

21

20,0%

33,3%

30,4%

4,3%

26,1%

30,4%

12

36

48

% within Hiperurisemia4

80,0%

66,7%

69,6%

% of Total

17,4%

52,2%

69,6%

15

54

69

100,0%

100,0%

100,0%

21,7%

78,3%

100,0%

% within Hiperurisemia4
% of Total
Perempuan

Total

Total

Count

Count
% within Hiperurisemia4
% of Total

Chi-Square Tests

Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correction

Likelihood Ratio

df

Asymp. Sig. (2-

Exact Sig. (2-

Exact Sig. (1-

sided)

sided)

sided)

,986a

,321

,457

,499

1,046

,306

Fisher's Exact Test

,527

Linear-by-Linear Association

,971

N of Valid Cases

,324

69

a. 1 cells (25,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4,57.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Symmetric Measures
Value
Nominal by Nominal
N of Valid Cases

Contingency Coefficient

Approx. Sig.

,119
69

,321

,255

Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
Odds Ratio for Jeniskelamin

Lower

Upper

,500

,125

1,999

,571

,180

1,817

1,143

,900

1,452

(Laki-laki / Perempuan)
For cohort Hiperurisemia4 =
tidak
For cohort Hiperurisemia4 =
ya
N of Valid Cases

69

Usia-Hiperurisemia (Uji Koefisien kontingensi + Risk factor)

Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid
N
Usia * Hiperurisemia

Missing
Percent

69

100,0%

Total

Percent
0

,0%

Percent
69

100,0%

Usia * Hiperurisemia Crosstabulation

Hiperurisemia
tidak
Usia

>40 tahun

31-40 tahun

Count

Total

11

51

62

% within Hiperurisemia

73,3%

94,4%

89,9%

% of Total

15,9%

73,9%

89,9%

26,7%

5,6%

10,1%

5,8%

4,3%

10,1%

15

54

69

100,0%

100,0%

100,0%

21,7%

78,3%

100,0%

Count
% within Hiperurisemia
% of Total

Total

ya

Count
% within Hiperurisemia
% of Total

Chi-Square Tests

Value

Asymp. Sig. (2-

Exact Sig. (2-

Exact Sig. (1-

sided)

sided)

sided)

df

Pearson Chi-Square

5,739a

,017

Continuity Correctionb

3,657

,056

Likelihood Ratio

4,729

,030

Fisher's Exact Test

,036

Linear-by-Linear Association

5,656

N of Valid Cases

,036

,017

69

a. 1 cells (25,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1,52.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Symmetric Measures
Value
Nominal by Nominal

Contingency Coefficient

Approx. Sig.

,277

N of Valid Cases

,017

69

Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
Odds Ratio for Usia (>40

Lower

Upper

,162

,032

,828

,310

,135

,716

1,919

,810

4,550

tahun / 31-40 tahun)

For cohort Hiperurisemia =
tidak
For cohort Hiperurisemia =
ya
N of Valid Cases

69

Case Processing Summary

Cases
Valid
N
Usia1 * Hiperurisemia1

Missing
Percent

69

100,0%

Total

Percent
0

,0%

Percent
69

100,0%

Usia1 * Hiperurisemia1 Crosstabulation

Hiperurisemia1
tidak
Usia1

<41 dan >50 tahun

41-50 tahun

Count

Ya
14

32

46

% within Hiperurisemia1

93,3%

59,3%

66,7%

% of Total

20,3%

46,4%

66,7%

22

23

% within Hiperurisemia1

6,7%

40,7%

33,3%

% of Total

1,4%

31,9%

33,3%

15

54

69

100,0%

100,0%

100,0%

21,7%

78,3%

100,0%

Count

Total

Total

Count
% within Hiperurisemia1
% of Total

Chi-Square Tests

Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correction

df

Likelihood Ratio

Exact Sig. (2-

Exact Sig. (1-

sided)

sided)

sided)

,013

4,696

,030

7,494

,006

6,133
b

Asymp. Sig. (2-

Fisher's Exact Test

,014

Linear-by-Linear Association

6,044

N of Valid Cases

,014

69

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 5,00.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Symmetric Measures
Value
Nominal by Nominal
N of Valid Cases

Contingency Coefficient

Approx. Sig.

,286
69

,013

,011

Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
Odds Ratio for Usia1 (<41

Lower

Upper

9,625

1,179

78,609

7,000

,980

49,996

,727

,589

,897

dan >50 tahun / 41-50

tahun)
For cohort Hiperurisemia1 =
tidak
For cohort Hiperurisemia1 =
Ya
N of Valid Cases

69

Case Processing Summary

Cases
Valid
N
Usia2 * Hiperurisemia2

Missing
Percent

69

98,6%

Total

Percent
1

1,4%

Percent
70

Usia2 * Hiperurisemia2 Crosstabulation

Hiperurisemia2
tidak
Usia2

<51 dan >60

51-60 tahun

Count

Total

12

35

47

% within Hiperurisemia2

80,0%

64,8%

68,1%

% of Total

17,4%

50,7%

68,1%

19

22

20,0%

35,2%

31,9%

4,3%

27,5%

31,9%

15

54

69

100,0%

100,0%

100,0%

21,7%

78,3%

100,0%

Count
% within Hiperurisemia2
% of Total

Total

ya

Count
% within Hiperurisemia2
% of Total

100,0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio

Asymp. Sig. (2-

Exact Sig. (2-

Exact Sig. (1-

sided)

sided)

sided)

df

1,246a

,264

,645

,422

1,328

,249

Fisher's Exact Test

,355

Linear-by-Linear Association

1,228

N of Valid Cases

,214

,268

69

a. 1 cells (25,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4,78.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Symmetric Measures
Value
Nominal by Nominal

Contingency Coefficient

Approx. Sig.

,133

N of Valid Cases

,264

69

Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
Odds Ratio for Usia2 (<51

Lower

Upper

2,171

,545

8,657

1,872

,587

5,969

,862

,681

1,092

dan >60 / 51-60 tahun)

For cohort Hiperurisemia2 =
tidak
For cohort Hiperurisemia2 =
ya
N of Valid Cases

69

Case Processing Summary

Cases
Valid
N
Usia3 * Hiperurisemia3

Missing
Percent

69

98,6%

Total

Percent
1

1,4%

Percent
70

100,0%

Usia3 * Hiperurisemia3 Crosstabulation

Hiperurisemia3
tidak
Usia3

<61

Count

>60 tahun

Total

44

52

% within Hiperurisemia3

53,3%

81,5%

75,4%

% of Total

11,6%

63,8%

75,4%

10

17

% within Hiperurisemia3

46,7%

18,5%

24,6%

% of Total

10,1%

14,5%

24,6%

15

54

69

100,0%

100,0%

100,0%

21,7%

78,3%

100,0%

Count

Total

ya

Count
% within Hiperurisemia3
% of Total

Chi-Square Tests

Value
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correction

df

Likelihood Ratio

Exact Sig. (2-

Exact Sig. (1-

sided)

sided)

sided)

,025

3,608

,058

4,571

,033

5,009
b

Asymp. Sig. (2-

Fisher's Exact Test

,040

Linear-by-Linear Association

4,937

N of Valid Cases

,026

69

a. 1 cells (25,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3,70.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Symmetric Measures
Value
Nominal by Nominal
N of Valid Cases

Contingency Coefficient

Approx. Sig.

,260
69

,025

,033

Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
Odds Ratio for Usia3 (<61 /

Lower

Upper

,260

,076

,884

,374

,159

,878

1,438

,951

2,177

>60 tahun)
For cohort Hiperurisemia3 =
tidak
For cohort Hiperurisemia3 =
ya
N of Valid Cases

69

Diabetes-Hiperurisemia (Uji Koefisien kontingensi + Risk factor)

Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid
N
Diabetes * Hiperurisemia

Missing
Percent

69

95,8%

Total

Percent
3

4,2%

72

Diabetes * Hiperurisemia Crosstabulation

Hiperurisemia
Tidak
Diabetes

<200

>200

Count

Total

11

20

% within Hiperurisemia

73,3%

16,7%

29,0%

% of Total

15,9%

13,0%

29,0%

45

49

26,7%

83,3%

71,0%

5,8%

65,2%

71,0%

15

54

69

100,0%

100,0%

100,0%

21,7%

78,3%

100,0%

Count
% within Hiperurisemia
% of Total

Total

Ya

Count
% within Hiperurisemia
% of Total

Percent
100,0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value

df

Asymp. Sig. (2-

Exact Sig. (2-

Exact Sig. (1-

sided)

sided)

sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

18,313a

,000

Continuity Correctionb

15,664

,000

Likelihood Ratio

17,021

,000

Fisher's Exact Test

,000

Linear-by-Linear Association

18,048

N of Valid Cases

,000

69

a. 1 cells (25,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4,35.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Symmetric Measures
Value
Nominal by Nominal

Contingency Coefficient

Approx. Sig.

,458

N of Valid Cases

,000

69

Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
Odds Ratio for Diabetes

Lower

Upper

13,750

3,566

53,026

6,738

2,431

18,673

,490

,300

,801

(<200 / >200)
For cohort Hiperurisemia =
Tidak
For cohort Hiperurisemia =
Ya
N of Valid Cases

69

Hubungan Usia-Jenis Kelamin-DMT 2 dengan Hiperurisemia

(Uji Regresi Logistik)

Logistic Regression

,000

Categorical Variables Codings

Parameter coding
Frequency
Usia

Diabetes
Jenis Kelamin

(1)

(2)

(3)

31-40

1,000

,000

,000

41-50

23

,000

1,000

,000

51-60

22

,000

,000

1,000

>60

17

,000

,000

,000

>200

49

1,000

<200

20

,000

21

1,000

48

,000

Classification Tablea,b
Observed

Predicted
Hiperurisemia
Ya

Step 0

Hiperurisemia

Tidak

Correct

Ya

54

100,0

Tidak

15

,0

Overall Percentage
a. Constant is included in the model.
b. The cut value is ,500

Percentage

78,3

Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

Chi-square
Step 1

Step 2a

df

Sig.

Step

36,022

,000

Block

36,022

,000

Model

36,022

,000

-,132

,717

Block

35,890

,000

Model

35,890

,000

Step

a. A negative Chi-squares value indicates that the Chi-squares

value has decreased from the previous step.

Variables in the Equation

95% C.I.for EXP(B)
B
Step 1a

Sex(1)

S.E.

-,390

1,089

Usia

Wald

df

Sig.

,128

,720

9,543

,023

Exp(B)

Lower

,677

,080

Usia(1)

,463

1,244

,139

,710

1,589

,139

Usia(2)

1,585

8,178

,004

,011

,000

1,253

3,073

,080

,111

,010

1,169

11,956

,001

,018

,002

1,231

4,904

,027

15,259

9,898

,019

4,53
3
Usia(3)

2,19
7

KadarG
ula(1)

4,04
3

Constan
t
Step 2

2,72
5

Usia
Usia(1)

,485

1,237

,154

,695

1,624

,144

Usia(2)

1,583

8,531

,003

,010

,000

1,233

2,978

,084

,119

,011

1,171

11,991

,001

,017

,002

1,211

4,740

,029

13,950

4,62
3
Usia(3)

2,12
8

KadarG
ula(1)

4,05
6

Constan
t

2,63
5

a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: Sex, Usia, KadarGula.

Upper