Anda di halaman 1dari 2

7/12/2016

IPCNotesunit1

Home

LawNotes

AboutDejuris

StudentForum

Studymaterial

IPCNotesUNIT1
INTRODUCTION
HistoryoftheIndianPenalCode:
DuringtheBritishPeriodtheGovernorGeneralAppointedtheIndianLawCommissionersinordertojudgetheconditionofthepenallawsprevalentin
IndiaandsuggestacomprehensivePenalCode.Intheyear1834theFirstLawCommissionwasconstitutedheadedbyLordMacauleyfordraftingthe
IndianPenalCode.TheDraftunderwentvariouslevelsofscrutinyandwasfinallypassedandreceivedtheGovernorGeneralsassenton6thOctober
1860andcametoforceon1stJanuary1862.
TheIPCisacomprehensivepieceoflegislation,whichinitiallyconsistedof23Chaptersand511Sectionsandasaresultofvariousamendmentsthatithas
gonethroughtherearefinally538sections.
ExtentandOperationoftheIndianPenalCode:
TheChapter1(Sections15)oftheIndianPenalCodedealswiththeextentandoperation.AccordingtoSection1oftheCodetheNameoftheCodeshall
beIndianPenalCodeandthesameshallbeapplicabletowholeofIndiaexceptJammuandKashmirvideArticle370oftheConstitutionofIndia.Every
personshallbeliabletopunishmentunderthiscodeforeveryactoromissioncontrarytotheActandnototherwise[1].
Section2oftheActdealswiththeIntraTerritorialJurisdiction,i.e.offencecommittedinIndiaandpunishedundertheCode.Thissectionassertsliability
onthebasisoflocalityandplaceofcommissionofoffence.InordertoinvokethecodeitmustbeproventhattheoffencewascommittedwithintheIndian
Territory.ThetermIndianTerritoryhasbeendefinedtoincludeland,water(inlandwaterincludingtheriver,canalsetc.)andtheportionsofsea.Every
PersonincludesCitizen,noncitizenandevenForeignersvisitingIndia.Althoughthesameexcludesjudicialperson(companiesetc.),thoughthesame
shallbeliablefortheactionsoftheirdirectorsbecauseoftheprincipleofVicariousLiability.
Cases:
InthecaseofStateofMaharashtravs.M.H.George(AIR1965SC722),itwasheldthattheforeignerwhoentersIndiabyacceptingtheallegianceof
Indianlawsisalsoliableforpunishmentincaseanoffenceiscommittedunderthecodeandthathecannottakeapleaofignoranceoflaw.
InthecaseofRvs.Esop[(1836)7ER203],itwasheldthatnopersoncantakethepleaofnotbeingawareofthecriminalityoftheactinthecountry.In
thiscasethepersonhadcontendedthatunnaturaloffencewasnotacriminalactinhislandoforiginBaghdadandthathewasnotawareofthefactthatthe
samewasacriminalact.Suchanargumentwasnegatedandthepersonwasconvicted.
InthecaseofMobarkAlivs.StateofBombay(AIR1957SC857),PakistanicitizenmadeafalserepresentationwhileinKarachiothecomplainantin
Bombaythroughletters,phonecallsandtelegramswhichinducedthecomplainanttopartwithanamountofaroundRs.5lacstotheagentoftheaccused
inBombaysothatricecouldbeshippedfromKarachitoBombay.NOricewassupplied.TheaccusedwascaughtinEnglandandbroughttoBombay
wherehewasprosecutedandconvictedunderSection420forcheating.TheSupremeCourtupheldtheconvictioneventhoughthepersonwasphysically
presentinBombay.
TheapplicationoftheActdependsupontheplacewheretheoffenceiscommittedandnotonthenationalityorplaceofresidenceoftheoffender.So,a
personphysicallypresentoutsideIndiacancommitanoffencewithinIndiaandshallbePunishableunderthecode.Thus,thecodeshallbeExtra
Territoriallyapplicableinthefollowingcases:

1.anycitizenofIndiainanyplacewithoutorbeyondIndia
2.anypersononashiporaircraftregisteredinIndia
3.anypersoninanyplacebeyondIndiawhereinthetargetoftheoffencebeingacomputerresourcelocatedin
India[2].
Section4oftheIPCextendstheapplicationofthecodetoanoffencecommittedoutsideIndiabyanIndiancitizenandoffencecommittedonashipor
aircraftregisteredinIndia.Therationalebehindthisextensionofcriminaljurisdictionothecourtsisbasedonthecontentionthateverysovereignstatecan
regulatetheconductofitscitizen,wheretheymightbeforthetimebeing.Clause2ofsection4givesAdmiraltyjurisdiction[3]totheIndianCourtsandthe
powertotryoffencescommittedonanyshiporaircraftregisteredinIndia.Ashipisconsideredtobeafloatingislandbelongingtothecountrywhoseflag
itisbearing.Thusallthevesselsareconsideredasthepartoftheterritoryofthecountrywhoseflagtheyfly.
ExceptiontoapplicabilityoftheAct:
TheActisnotapplicabletosoldiers,sailorsorairmenintheserviceoftheGovernmentofIndiabecausetherearedifferentlawsforpunishingsuch
personnel[4].

[1]Section2IPC
[2]Section4IPC
[3]Section188CrPC
[4]Section5IPC

GotoPage1

Page2

Page3

Page8

Page4

Page11
Page12
http://dejurislawnotesin.cluster2.hostgator.co.in/lawnotes/ipcnotesunit1

Page9

Page5

Page13

Page10

Page6

Page7

Page14

1/2

7/12/2016

IPCNotesunit1

Page11

Page12

Page13

Page14

Copyright2014@DejurisConsultants

Social

Email

Dejurislawnotes@gmail.com
Pranam.pankaj@gmail.com

Tweet
Like

http://dejurislawnotesin.cluster2.hostgator.co.in/lawnotes/ipcnotesunit1

0
Share 697peoplelikethis.

2/2

Anda mungkin juga menyukai