Energy
and Buildings
28 (1998)
159-166
of Mechanical
Engineeting,
Received
Karadeniz
Technical
University,
61080 Trabzon,
Turkey
Abstract
In this study, the effects of thermophysical properties andthicknessof a wall of a building on time lag and decrement factor have been
investigated. For this purpose, one dimensional transient heat conduction equation was solved using Crank-Nicolson scheme under convection
boundaryconditions.To the outersurface of the wall, periodic boundary conditions were applied. A very general code which can take care
of composite walls under any kind of boundary condition was developed. Single and combined effects of the thickness and thermophysical
properties on the time lag and decrement factor were investigated. It was found that thermophysical properties have a very profound effect on
the time lag and decrement factor. The computations were repeated for different building materials and the results are discussed.
0 1998
Elsevier Science S.A. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
factor;
Thermophysical
properties
1. Introduction
The adobe houseconstruction is very common in many
areasof the world. In the USA, it is developedby the Indians
in the southwestregions.In Turkey, adobehouseconstruction
is seen in eastern and southern part of the country. In the
Black Sea region, northern coast of the country, traditional
humsesalsonave waMs mahe of &one an6 ah&e. It is we%
known that adobehouseconstruction yield a natural air condirtiron@ eI&z~.Tne roomsare coo1at mid&q an& warm a1
night. The houseconstructionsmentionedabove are nothing
but passive so&buildings.
For passivesolarbuildings, heatingthe building is possible
via direct heatgain aridlor thermal storagemelho& andthere
have been many researcheson this area [I--3). Although
direct heat gain method is simple and inexpensive, it suffers
from iage %emperaWeswingsbesidesstrong directiOna day
lighting [ 41. In addition, direct heat gain method can be
effected very fast from outside temperature fluctuations
which results to a bed comfort level for indoors [ 5-71. For
thermal storagebuildings on the other hand, walls and floors
are used as heat storageelements,and stored energy in the
walls and floors during day period can be usedfor heating
during nights.
* Corresponding
author.
0378-7788/98/$
- see front matter 0
PUSO378-7788(98)00007-3
1998 Elsevier
160
and Buildings
wall
28 (1998)
159-166
,T,&X
outdoor
._....... __........--.e....-
Ti
Twin
Fig. I. The schematic
representation
factor5
Cf=A,=,,IA,,)
layer
1
interior
layer
layer
layer
exterior
Ti
TO
hi
h,
#TX,
TX
*X
0-1----+-L
of the problem
geometry.
80
2. Method
Inside
-
k$ =pc,$
Surface
-
T*mpmtun
Analybcalsdutii
( Thdkek! [IS] )
Numerical solutim
(PnuamdY)
(1)
(2)
*=O
whereason the outer surface of the wall, the boundary condition can be written as:
"
Fig. 3. Comparison
Threlkeld [ 151.
"
n"
of present
I "
I 12
Time, hr
computations
16
with
20
analytical
24
solution
of
and Buildings
Here, again hi is the wall inner surface heat transfer coefficient, h, the wall outer surface heat transfer coefficient, TX= o
is the wall inner surface temperature, TxxL is the wall outer
surface temperature,T, is the room air temperatureand rs;;,(t)
is the sol-air
temperature.
This temperature includes the
effects of the solar radiation combined with outside air temperatureand changesperiodically. The sol-air temperatureis
assumedto show sinusoidalvariations during 24-h period.
At the sametime, since time lag and decrement factor are
dependent on wall material only not on the climatological
data [ 141, a very generalequation for sol-air temperatureis
taken as follows:
ITmax-Tminl
+T
(4)
In,".
159-166
161
(3)
28 (1998)
24
20
16
12
6
4
0
1 E+4
Cc)
of time dependent
heat capacity.
1 E+5
1 E+6
1E+6
1E+7
C (J/Km*)
(b)
1 E+4
lE+5
lE+7
C (J/Km*)
with heat capacity.
(b) Variation
(c) Variation
of
162
/Energy
and Buildings
28 (I998)
159-166
24
20
-;
,lnlL
0.01
0.1
10
100
1000
k(WlmK)
0.6
0.5
(cl
Fig. 5. (a) Variation of time dependent wall inner surface temperature
Variation of decrement factorfkth
thermal conductivity.
k (WImK)
with thermal
conductivity,
(b) Variation
conductivity.
(c)
figure, for increasing heat capacity, wall inner surface temperature goes to a constant value. This was expected because
if the heat capacity is too high, the stored heat energy in the
wall can sustain almost constant inner wall temperature.
From Fig. 4a, time lags and decrement factors are also apparent. But to see the effects of heat capacity on time lags and
decrement factors more clearly, time lag vs. heat capacity and
decrement factor vs. heat capacity are plotted in Fig. 4b and
4c, respectively. As seen from Fig. 4b, there is an exponential
relationship between time lag and heat capacity. As the heat
capacity goes to its maximum value, time lag exponentially
goes to infinity. On the other hand, as the heat capacity goes
to zero, time lag goes to zero also. In Fig. 4c, the relationship
between decrement factor and heat capacity is given. Here,
an inverse exponential relationship between decrement factor
and heat capacity is present. As heat capacity goes to its
maximum value, decrement factor goes to zero and as heat
capacity goes to zero, decrement factor takes certain constant
value.
Fig. 5 gives the time dependent wall inner surface temperature in the case of varying thermal conductivity and constant
heat capacity. As seen from Fig. 5, for small values of thermal
I63
24
16
0.001
0.01
0.1
1 (ml
&I
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
0.001
Cc)
0.01
0.1
l(m)
Fig. 6. (a) Variation of time dependent wall inner surfacetemmrature with thickness of the wall. (b) Variation of time lag QIwith thickness of the wall, (c)
Variation of decrement facrorfwith thickness of the wall.
In Fig. 7a, the combined effects of heat capacity and thermal conductivity on time lag is given. As seen from Fig. 7a,
low thermal conductivity and large heat capacity results to
high time lags. Fig. 7b is nothing but the top view of Fig. 7a.
Here, computed time lags for different materials are presented. As seen from Fig. 7b, since metals like steel ant
aluminum have high heat capacities, it is expected that the
should have high time lags. But since they have high therrr
conductivity which is inversely proportional with time 1,
164
and Buildings
159-166
logk(WlmK)
logk(WlmK)
Fig. 7. (a) Combined effects of heat capacity
time lag. (b) Computed time lags for different
28 (1998)
on
the desired time lags are not high enough. On the other hand,
materials with low thermal conductivity like formaldehyde
and polyurethane have low heat capacity at the same time and
results to low time lags. As seen from Fig. 7b, especially
asbestos, rubber and, to some extent, asphalt andgraniteresult
to considerably high time lags because these materials have
low thermal conductivity and high heat capacity.
The combined effects of heat capacity and thermal conductivity on decrement factor is given in Fig. 8a. As seen
from Fig. 8a, heat capacity has very mild effect on decrement
factor and it is determined mostly by thermal conductivity.
As mentioned before, materials with high thermal conductivity results to high decrement factor. Again Fig. 8b is the top
view of Fig. 8a. Here, computed decrement factors for different materials are shown. As seen from Fig. 8b, formaldehyde and polyurethane result to very small decrement factors
because they have very low thermal conductivity. But as
remembered before, since these materials have small heat
capacities they have small time lags also. Comparing Fig. 7b
with Fig. 8b, it is seen that asbestos, rubber and, to some
extent, asphalt and granite result to high time lags and small
decrement factors.
In Fig. 9a, the cross-section of three-layer wall without
insulation and in Fig. 9b, the cross-section of five-layer wall
(with insulation) are given. In Fig. lOa, the transient temperature profiles of any location of the wall without insulation
is given. Here, x = 0 represents the wall inner surface and
x= 14 cm represents the wall outer surface. From Fig. lOa,
time lags and time factors are also visible. Fig. lob shows the
decrease of amplitude of the temperature profile with respect
to x.
In Fig. 1 la, the transient temperature profiles of any location of the wall with insulation is given. Here, also time lags
and decrement factors are seen from the graph. Comparing
Fig. 1Oawith Fig. 1la, it is apparent that wall with insulation
results to high time lag and small decrement factor even if
both walls have the same total thickness. As seen from Fig.
lla, between wall inner surface and insulation location,
almost constant temperature profile is obtained (small decrement factor). Again in Fig. 1lb, the decrease of the amplitude of the temperature profile with respect to x is given. The
work is going on to optimize the insulation thickness and
/ Energy
and Buildings
28 (I 998) 159-166
165
insulation)
outdoor
10
I 2 I[cml
(4
five-layer wall (with insulation)
outdoor
! 2 I[cml
I
0.02
/
0.04
I
0.06
(b)
(b)
I
0.08
/
0.10
I
0.12
I
0.14
x(m)
1
0.00
insulation).
4. Conclusions
In this study, to determine the effects of the thickness and
thermophysical properties of a wall on time lag and decrement
factor, a detailed computational study was made. Single and
combined effects of the thickness and thermophysical properties on the time lag and decrement factor were investigated.
It was found that thermophysical properties have a very profound effect on the time lag and decrement factor. The computations were repeated for different building materials and
the results are discussed. The results of this study are useful
for designing more effective passive solar buildings and other
related areas.
A 1 I
0.00
0.02
(b)
I,
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.10
0.12
.I, 1
0.14
x(m)
166
Table 1
Compound
Building
decrement
material
Cement sheet
Concrete block
Brick block
Gypsum plastering
Granite (red) block
Marble (white) block
Sandstone block
Clay sheet
Asphalt sheet
Steel slab
Aluminum
slab
Cork board
Wood block
Plastic board
Rubber board
P.V.C. board
Asbestos sheet
Formaldehyde
board
Thermalite board
Fibreboard
Siporex board
Polyurethane
board
Light plaster
Dense plaster
building
Energy
[21
131
141
L-51
[61
[71
28 (1998)
159-166
materials
P Wm3)
Cp (J/kg K)
k (W/m
700
1400
1800
1200
2650
2500
2200
1900
2300
7800
2700
160
800
1050
1600
1379
2500
30
753
300
550
30
600
1300
1050
loo0
840
837
900
880
712
837
1700
502
880
1888
2093
837
200
1004
1050
1674
837
1000
1004
837
1000
1000
0.36
0.5 1
0.62
0.42
2.90
2.00
1.83
0.85
1.20
50.00
210.00
0.04
0.16
0.50
0.30
0.16
0.16
0.03
0.19
0.06
0.12
0.03
0.16
0.50
References
Cl1 C.
and Buildings
Carter, I. DeWilliers,
Principles of Passive Solar Building Design,
Pergamon, NY, 1987.
J.D. Balcomb et al., Passive Solar Buildings, MIT Press, MA, 1992.
B. Givoni, Characteristics,
design implications,
and applicability
of
passive solar heating systems for buildings,
Solar Energy 47 (6)
(1991) 425435.
A.K. Athienitis,
H.F. Sullivan, K.G.T. Hollands, Analytical
model,
sensitivity analysis, and algorithm for temperature
swings in direct
gain rooms, Solar Energy 36 (4) ( 1986) 303-3 12.
J. Maloney, T. Wan, B. Chen, J. Thorp, Thermal network predictions
of the daily temperature
fluctuations
in a direct gain room, Solar
Energy29(3)
(1982) 207-223.
M.S. Sodha, J.K. Nayak, N.K. Bansal, I.C. Goyal, Thermal performance of a solarium with removable insulation, Building Environ.
17
(1) (1982) 23-32.
G. Athanassouli,
A model to the thermal transient state of an opaque
K)
C (kJ/K
735
1400
1512
1004
2385
2200
1566
1590
3910
3916
2376
302
1674
879
3200
1385
2625
50
630
300
552
25
600
1300
m)
4 (h)
0.26
0.44
0.46
0.28
0.59
0.56
0.40
0.45
1.03
0.89
0.55
0.32
0.79
0.27
1.17
0.65
1.23
0.06
0.28
0.24
0.26
0.03
0.28
0.4 1
0.544
0.588
0.609
0.564
0.701
0.689
0.688
0.639
0.647
0.179
0.733
0.174
0.403
0.587
0.50 1
0.406
0.396
0.139
0.439
0.234
0.355
0.139
0.408
0.586