by
Dr. A.M. Hasan R. Khan
&
Ir. P. Ver-haart
The Woodburning Stove Group
Eindhoven University of Technology,
Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Council
of
Industrial Research.
Mirpur Road, Dhaka - 1205
Bangladesh
Scientific
and
CONTENTS
page nr.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
II
ABSI"RACT
II I
1 . INTRODUCTION
1.1 General
2. EXPERIMENTS
2.1 Downdraft Stoves
2.2 Procedure
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
7
7
9
12
12
16
19
23
26
28
32
4. CONCLUSIONS
35
5. REFERENCES
36
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The work reported in this study was made possible by a fellowship
granted by the Commission of the European Communities, Brussels
to Dr. A.M. Hasan R. Khan and arranged by the Science and
Technology Division, Ministry of Education, Government of the
People's Republic of Bangladesh. The work was supervised by Dr.
K. Krishna Prasad of the faculty of Physics, at the Eindhoven
University of Technology. For this investigation, the laboratory
facilities of the Woodburning Stove Group were used. Dr. Hasan
was assisted by Ernst Schutte and Niek Verhoeven in the
laboratory and data processing.
II
ABSTRACT
I II
1.
INTRODUCTION
1.1 General
From the dawn of civilization man has known the use of fire.
Since then, fire-wood and other traditional fuels are used for
cooking purposes. About half of the world's population, living in
predominantly rural areas of the developing countries use
traditional fuels for cooking and other purposes. The most common
device used for this purpose is the three stone stove. Available
information indicates huge amounts of fire-wood are being
consumed in the developing countries for cooking purposes. It is
generally believed that this is due to inefficient cooking
devices used. Apart from low efficiency, these stoves emit smoke
which affects the health of the users and make the kitchen dirty.
With the growth of population in the developing countries the
regeneration rate of traditional sources of fuel is gradually
falling behind the consumption rate. A fuel supply crisis has
appeared on the horizon and in some countries already has assumed
alarming dimensions. Agricultural residues, fallen leaves,
cow-dung, etc. which should be used to increase the fertility of
the soil for cash crops production. now are being used as cooking
fuels. Even the bark of large trees, by the side of the road, is
taken off for cooking fuel. Most developing countries have a
forest area much below the sustainable level. This is causing a
change in the eco-system leading to erosion and changes in the
climate. To check this crisis, attempts are being made the
world-over to improve the efficiency of cooking devices, to
increase the regeneration rate of the traditional sources by more
planting, including fast growing species and to make use of
alternative sources of energy such as solar energy.
For the past 8 - 10 years scientists and technologists all-over
the world realized this alarming crisis of traditional fuels.
1
),
---~coHb
CO + Hb
( 1. 2)
co(%)
atmosphere
015
I
I
I
I
I
0.1
~--
''
------- ---
--- --
poisoning
0.05
~-~---
\
\.,
'.._..__
(MAC)
b resting
60
120
moving
30
60
0
0
-- -------------20
working
40
(ii)
Flame
..---_o____
Char
(
""""'- - - -
-:.
Pyrolytic
_
zone
~
B
:I: - - - - - - -
Virgin
wood
A
- -
T ~200 C
2.
EXPERIMENTS
I;'.
!.~
:~1
~
~
(,?\
~-
--
fl
....,
C "'~
""":
Ii
't
l::
~
i.:i
,r--'" ---'
~
'"
' .1
f::
I]
~:
"~
190
0120
~
:~
J.'
'I
--.
t'
<>-'----C>
cL() l/j'
,.
~
AE
---
0 130
500
The first stove was burnt away after performing only part of the
experiments due to high power outputs, so the rest of the
experiments was done with the second one. Both stoves produced
fluegases which contain very small percentages of carbon
monoxide. As the specifications of the two stoves are different,
the first one is capable of a power output of 2.6 - 4.4, and the
second one between 5.4 - 7.3 kW.
0105
I
I
c
IQ
10
0
0 1 20
1 __ J01___ J
A E ~""'
C>
0 130
<Jc--------C>
24 5
Figure 2.2: Downdraft stove-II (dimensions in mm).
A: bowl; B: grate; C: main body with chimney:
D: insulation; E: Secondary air by-pass.
Principle of combustion
When wood is heated, the volatiles are released and the charcoal
is left on the grate. For proper combustion of the volatiles and
the charcoal in a classical stove, air enters the stove by
natural draught in two different directions. (i) Primary air
enters from under the grate and moves in upward direction through
the fuelbed and helps the burning of the charcoal. (ii) Secondary
air enters along with the fuel through the feedhole and helps the
burning of the volatiles.
In the present design of the downdraft stove, there is no
distinction between primary and secondary air. All the air passes
through the fuelbed by natural draught. It acts both as primary
and secondary air. In the present design there is a provision for
a secondary air by-pass.
2.2 Procedure
During each experiment, the fuel consumption rate and CO, C0 2 and
0 2 contents of flue gases were recorded. Figure 2.3, represents
the experimental set-up. The entire downdraft stove was made with
mild steel sheet. It has three parts: stove body, bowl and
chimney. The dimensions are mentioned in Figures 2.1 and 2.2. At
the bottom of the bowl there is a grate. The grate was made by
welding 8 metal strips at lOmm intervals at the bottom of the
bowl. The distance between the last strip to the wall, where the
provision was made for secondary air by-pass, was 20 mm. The
entire stove was covered with insulating material, Al 2 0 3 fibre.
It was then placed on an electronic balance, with a sensitivity
of lg. The desired number of wood blocks for an experiment was
placed on a tray attached to the balance. The bowl was placed in
the mouth of the stove. The calibration of the appratus was done
with pure Nitrogen gas for 4 minutes, calibration gas for 6 min.
(0 2 = 7.34%; CO= 0.47%; C0 2 = 6.04%; N2 = 86.15%) and with air
for 12 min. (0 2 = 20.94%; C0 2 = 0.03%; N2 = 79.03%).
12
2a
~~==~,--8---,1======1
11
3.
20
0 .0 8
15
(.)
(\J
0 .06
':!?.
10
':!?.
_j
_J
>
0.04
>
71
0 .0 2
0.00
0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
TI M E (MIN)
Figure 3.1:
10.80
2 0:
J 0 .60
~
(\J
0
ci'2
_J
C\J
0 .4 0
10
u
......
>
0.20
0 L.....!...~L.!_~~----'-"_L.'.---'---------"---'-'--'--'---'--'--~'----~~-~ 0 .00
60
50
40
30
10
20
0
TIME (MIN)
Figure 3.2:
A.
(3.1)
Figure 3.3 represents the excess air factor in the flue gases.
The horizontal line through the experimental data indicates the
average value, which is 2.33 .
5
;---~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-
4.5
iI
4 jI
I
I
er
1(.)
<
LI..
er
<
3.5
3
(/)
(/)
lJJ
(.)
><
lJJ
2.5
1
I
i
I
/:: I(\
I~ i/ ~
1
J,v
,J .
' .
\)
I
0
20
40
TME!MINI
Figure
3.~:
Fuel consumption
The fuel consumption rate is represented in figure 3.4. The
average charging rate of the fuel was 333.3 mg/s, and the average
combustion rate recorded by the computer is 334.6 mg/s. The
figure shows that the fuel consumption rate during the experiment
is constant.
14
60
1000
800
>
0
w
2
600
:i
({)
400
_J
:i
LL
200
10
20
30
40
50
60
TIME (MIN)
Figure 3.4:
Power output
The general equation for the average power output is:
av
(3.2)
Where:
=average power output of the fire (kW).
sum of the individual wood charges during the experiment
(kg).
B
tT
15
i)
Smell
ii)
Inflamability
Accumulation of charcoal
wa~
chimney. In this experiment, the flue gases did not catch fire.
The presence of dust particels in the flue gases and the
accumulation of charcoal were determined by observation. This
experiment showed neither dust particles in the flue gases nor
accumulation of charcoal.
The downdraft stove, in its present design, is very sensitive to
its operational variables. To ascertain these, a systematic study
of various variables, viz effect of woodblock sizes, fuel
charging intervals, wood species, secondary air by-pass and power
output was carried out. The results in tables I and II were
obtained by using downdraft stove-I and the rest of the tables
contain the results obtained by using downdraft stove-II.
av A
(3.3)
= Penetration
rate (nun/s)
v = Volume/surface
A
= Volatile
area (mm)
fraction
~.SC .
::J/)70
I!
!
'
I'
:
~
oc.
~
/
u
u
I
I
l'!
ll
?'
'-
0.50
"
'-,
%6)
.,
r-
~r050
c<
z
f--
<
[[
f--
0 .0 40
+
<J
w
w
Q_
000
0.30
0.40
0.50
0 .030
0.60
Figure 3.5:
17
Sl.
/Jr.
.....
00
Penetration
rate
le11arks
{mm/s)
0.367
2/45
3.74
0.016
11.49
8.99
0.136
0.039
X, A, N
0.393
1/30
3.83
0.014
10.99
9.66
0.128
0.043
X, A, N
0.423
2/75
4.38
0.006
6.42
13.79
0.088
0.044
X, A, N
0.485
1/45
3.79
0.019
11.29
9.21
0.175
0.046
X, D, N
0.532
1/60
3.87
0.032
9.21
11.34
0.364
0.052
X, A, N
0.589
1/120
3.00
0.086
7.52
13.15
1.228
0.059
S, A, N
0.393
0.485
0.589
3/60
2/60
1/60
2.65
0.084
10.55
9.90
0.751
X, A, N
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
S
X
I
D
A
C
N
vI
5 11 5 0
I:I I
0
6
2160
u
'-
0
6
1130
""'-'~~=-<:~~~~-L.o........~=-Co.....,,i::~ci.,.."'"""""'=>l::t:::::::..~-=~~~~"""'8:~
Figure 3.6:
10
20
30
40
50
60
Charging
SL. rate
Kr.
(block~/~)
~rface
le11ark~ #
1/30
0.393
3.83
0.014
10.99
9.66
0.129
x,
2/60
0.393
3.97
0.029
9.37
11.20
0.346
X, A, N
5/150
0.393
3.44
0.068
5.54
14.71
1.117
X, D,
3/75
0.393
3.87
0.038
7.78
12.33
0.445
1/60
0.532
3.87
0.032
9.21
11.34
0.364
2/150
0.532
2.97
0.043
8.62
11.89
0.534
x,
x,
x,
A' N
I'.)
A,
c
c
A' N
A' N
SL. rate
Kr. {block&/&)
loer
oat pat
(kl/}
Cl
Cl2
12 Cl/Cl2
(1.)
{Vol.'!.) (Vol.'!.} (Vol.'!.)
le11arb
2/30
5.57
0.003
9.18
11.30
0.030
X, A, N
4/60
5.49
0.016
7.47
13.07
0. 266
X, A, N
8/120
5.61
0.024
8.78
11.83
0.415
16/240
5.92
0.035
9.64
10.70
0.624
x,
x,
20/240
7.03
0.013
10.78
9.37
0.151
A, N
A, N
X, I, D, N
=
=
=
=
= x
= I
= D
resulting in
9
0
9
~
C\J
0
9
u
0
u
'-
81120
0
9
4/60
0
9
2 130
0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
TIME (MIN)
Figure 3.7:
22
It was also noticed that, during the experiment due to high power
output, sometimes flames appeared at the top of the chimney. At
that time the flue gas collection point in the chimney was about
20 cm from the top (see figure 2.3), and took in unburnt gas. So
the CO/C0 2 peaks which appear at the top of the figure (20
blocks/240 s) are not indicative of complete combustion. We
conclude that it is possible to bring down the CO/C0 2 ratio's by
proper adjustment of the charging intervals.
,...,
b, Vol% C02
Vo!%
02
I
r
0.04
,-,
I L.V
Vo!% CC
+
6
C'~
r;
15
'o~
>
0~
10
_I
>
(\!
0.02
0~
_J
>
0.00
White f 1r
Oak
Beech
WOOD SPECIES
Figure 3.8:
23
t=..
_,
CO!C02
I
0.30
(\)
()
2...
II
0.20
0'
tr
2
()
0 .1 0
u
<t
i.L
a:
<[
if)
en
w
()
,;
E1
0.00 ~-----~------~-------' 0
Oak
Beech
WOOD SPECIES
Figure 3.9:
The CO/C0 2 ratio's show not much difference among the wood
species. But the excess air factor is much lower in case of Oak
and Beech. The lowest excess air factor recorded in this
investigation for Beech is 1.38.
24
Sl.
Kr.
food
species
Vo lame/
surface
area(cm}
1 Vhite Fir
0.367
Oak
Beech
Charging Po11er
rate
output
{blocks/s) {kY}
Excess
air
co
C02
CO/C02 factor
02
(Yol. 7.) (Vol. 7.) (Yol. i.)
('!.)
lemarks u
5.58
0.017
7.44
13.27
0.257
2.87
X, D, N
0.295
0.013
14.58
5.47
0.083
1.46
X, I, D, N
0.295
0.052
15.57
5.09
0. 269
1.38
x,
2/30
*Due
I ' D, N
to high ppwer output, the aimed charging rate could not be maintained and consequently the
charging rate was lowered
**
= s
= x
= I
= D
= A
= c
= N
0.020
+ Vol%
CO
2C,
,6 Vol% C02
02
Vo110
I
I
~I
0.015
1 '.':
,-
u
'0:!?.
_J
>
0.010
-l
10
>
,,c
0
u
0.005
>
OPEN
HALF OPEN
CLOSED
The figure shows that there is not much difference among the
concentrations of C0 2 and 0 2 for different by-pass settings.
However, the concentration of CO in the case of a closed
secondary air by-pass is 0.003%, which is little lower than that
of the other two settings. Figure 3.11 represents the CO/C0 2
ratio and excess air factor of the flue gases as a function of
different secondary air by-pass settings.
26
::<
SL.
Nr.
Seco~dary
air
by-pa~~
open
2 half open
3
closed
Exce~~
air
factor
le11ark~
5.44
0.009
8.30
12.32
0.120
2.57
X, D, N
5.58
0.016
7.44
13.27
0.257
2.87
X, D, N
5.57
0.003
9.18
11.30
0.030
2.33
X, D, N
=
=
s
x
= I
= D
=
=
O.S O
+ COIC02
/::,.
E xc ess
i'l''
fac l ( r
~ ~
0.40
0.30
C\J
u
....._
0
~I 3
0 .20
/.
0 . 10
0.00 ~-----~------~-----~
OPEN
HALF OPEf''\J
(!
CLOSED
SECOr'-JDARY AIR B Y -P A SS
Figure 3.11: CO/C0 2 and excess air factor in the flue gases as a
function of the secondary air by-pass setting.
28
co
C02
CO/C02
02
{Yol. 7.) {Yol. 7.) {Yol. 7.)
(7.)
Excess
air
factor
lemarks n
5.57
2/30
0.003
9.18
11.30
0.030
2.33
X, A, N
6.73
3/30 *
0.007
12.93
7.85
0.054
1. 73
x,
7.32
4/30 *
0.006
11.58
8.31
0.054
1.85
A, N
X, I, D, N
Due to high power output, the aimed charging rate could not be maintained and
consequently the charging rate was lowered.
**
= s
= x
= I
= D
= A
= c
=
output was varied from 5.6 - 7.3 kW. It has not been possible to
bring the power output below 5.6 kW or above 7.3 kW with this
particular size of woodblocks and charging rate because the power
output will be too low and too high respectively and impossible
to control. Figure 3.12 represents the effect of power output on
the carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide and oxygen content of the
flue gases as a function of time .
0.015
+ Vol% co
(\j
!:::, V o l% C02
0.0 10
:-:'
0 Vol% 0 2
u
0~
_J
>
0.00 5
(\J
G
~
o
...J
>
30
of the flue gases. With the increase of power output, the CO/C0 2
ratio slightly increased. It is very interesting to note that at
a power output of 5.6 kW, the CO/C02 ratio was 0.030%, but even
at the highest power output of 7.3 kW it was 0.054%. The
difference in CO/C02 ratio is still very low. In most of the
other woodburning devices, with the increase of power output,
this ratio increases sharphly. The excess air factor also
decreases with an increase of the power output. The lowest value
is 1.73.
0.30
3.00
+ COIC02
!:::,.
2.40
c::
f(j
0.20
1.80
(\J
(j
<!
---..
(j
<!
LL
1.20
0. 10
(./)
lf)
(j
0.60
~__+--t
0.00
0.00
4
Figure 3. 13: CO/C02 ratio and excess air factor in the flue gases as a
function of different power outputs.
Figure 3.14 shows the CO/C02 ratio's in the flue gases of various
burning devices viz. wood, gas, kerosene, coal etc . along with
the downdraft stove, as a function of the power output. It is
clearly shown that the downdraft stove has very low CO/C0 2
ratio's even at a power output of 7.3 kW, which is even much
lower than the figure allowed for gas burners.
31
10
~,~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.
- - - - - - -
-- /"'
-- - - - - -- -
;.f.
/
./
o/
f-
<t
(\!
u
u
'-
Figure 3.14: CO/C0 2 ratio in the flue gases as a function of the power
output, for various burning devices.
--4= Downdraft stove;
= Cas appliances;
= Kerosene burners;
- =Anthracite burners;
=Domestic space heaters (P max):
.
=Domestic space heaters (P ma.x/2);
Woodburning cookstoves, shielded fire type
~= Combustion chamber diameter = 20cm;
-o= Combustion chamber diameter = 25cm;
-0= Combustion chamber diameter = 30cm.
c=
Q K (1 - e-Rt)
co
VR
Where: C
Qco
= CO
= CO
(3.4)
100
(%)
emission
(m3/h)
32
= Inhomogeneity
= Air exchange
v = Space volume
t
= time
(-)
factor
-1
rate
(h
(mo)
(h)
= 0 means a
K = 1, means
Stove
type
Powe.r
Consumed aJ2
aJ
OUtp.Lt
IDOod
(kW)
kg/h
Downdraft
5.58
1.22
metal
0.84
9. 1
Table VII:
g/h
ppm
/h
'"'/h
-4
0.36
41
0.036
10
893
33
w
0::
I
o_
U)
\
C1.Ci 2r-=.+
!
r
I-
<
. ,., ,.....
1.
- r\ L
0 .U
- 1
./
I
i
v . ,......., -
"-...
/
/
E .x::.cs~.r=~
34
4.
(i)
CONCLUSIONS
The downdraft stove in its present design, is very
sensitive to its operational variables.
(ii)
= 0.006%)
in a small device .
(v)
(vi)
5.
REFERENCES
36