ISSN 2250-3153
101
Department of Polymer Science & Tech, S.K.University, Anantapuramu 515003 A.P, India.
2
Department of Chemistry, S.K.University, Anantapuramu 515003 A.P, India.
I. INTRODUCTION
www.ijsrp.org
International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 6, Issue 6, June 2016
ISSN 2250-3153
II. EXPERIMENTAL
2.1Materials
Poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) having a viscosity average
molecular weight of 70,000 and degree of Hydroxylation 86 89
% , Acetone and Hydrochloric acid were purchased from S.d.
102
www.ijsrp.org
International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 6, Issue 6, June 2016
ISSN 2250-3153
103
of
swelling
(S)
(%)
(W s -W d )
100
Wd
Where W S and W d are the mass of the swollen and dry
membranes, respectively.
International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 6, Issue 6, June 2016
ISSN 2250-3153
104
www.ijsrp.org
International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 6, Issue 6, June 2016
ISSN 2250-3153
105
www.ijsrp.org
International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 6, Issue 6, June 2016
ISSN 2250-3153
106
www.ijsrp.org
International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 6, Issue 6, June 2016
ISSN 2250-3153
107
Fig. 5: XRD spectra of (a) Pristine PVA and MMMs of (b) PVHNC-2 (c) PVHNC -3
90
80
Degree of swelling (%)
V. MEMBRANE PERFORMANCE
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
11
12
13
14
15
www.ijsrp.org
International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 6, Issue 6, June 2016
ISSN 2250-3153
108
prepared in this work is useful for the separation of isopropanolwater mixtures by pervaporation (PV) experiment.
6.2. Effect of feed water composition on the PV performance
PV studies have shown that membrane performance is
affected by the water content in the feed mixture. In PV, the
effect of feed is also an important factor, and thus we have
carried out a PV study at different mass % of water in the feed
and resulting data is presented in Fig.7 & 8. It is observed that
the flux was increased with increase of the water composition in
the feed. This is mainly because of increased membrane
swelling. This is expected due to an establishment of greater
interaction between the membrane and the water molecules as
membrane contains a large number of hydrophilic groups such as
OH, -COOH and CH2, which prefer water molecules rather
than IPA. On the contrary, the selectivity was decreased
exponentially with increasing the mass% of water in the feed. At
a higher concentration of water in the feed, a small amount of
water dissolves in the membrane, which in turn acts as a
plasticizer for the membrane, leading to more flexible polymeric
chains in the matrix. In addition, as water is more polar in nature
its absorption in the membrane might have weakened the
interaction between polymer and clay material, resulting in a
somewhat loose structure, which becomes responsible for
facilitating the diffusion of some of the IPA molecules in
association with water molecules.
1: Pervaporation data of the Pristine PVA and MMMs of
PVHNC-2, PVHNC-3 for feed mixture of water IPA at 30 0
C.
Wt.%.
water
feed
of
in
Wt.%.
water
permeate
of
in
Flux (J)
(Kg/m2 h)
()
Selectivity
Pristine PVA
10.0
94.32
0.1600
12.5
92.32
0.1804
84
15.0
90.08
0.2681
50
10.0
99.60
0.3643
2241
12.5
99.20
0.3878
868
15.0
98.84
0.4021
477
10.0
99.63
0.3725
2423
12.5
99.30
0.3985
992
15.0
98.91
0.4096
508
151
PVHNC-2
PVHNC-3
www.ijsrp.org
International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 6, Issue 6, June 2016
ISSN 2250-3153
109
Pristine PVA
PVHNC-2
PVHNC-3
2500
Selectivity
2000
1500
1000
500
0
10
11
12
13
14
15
Fig. 7: Selectivity vs. wt. % of water in feed mixture for pristine PVA membrane and MMMs of PVHNC-2, PVHNC-3.
Pristine PVA
PVHNC-2
PVHNC-3
0.42
0.40
0.38
0.36
0.34
Flux (J)
0.32
0.30
0.28
0.26
0.24
0.22
0.20
0.18
0.16
10
11
12
13
14
15
Fig. 8: Flux vs. wt. % of water in feed mixture for pristine PVA membrane and MMMs of PVHNC -2,
PVHNC-3.
www.ijsrp.org
International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 6, Issue 6, June 2016
ISSN 2250-3153
110
Table.2: Comparison of PV performance of the present MMMs with literature data for water-isopropanol separation.
Membrane
Temperature (
0
C)
Wt. %. of
water in
feed
Flux
(Kg/m2h )
Selectivity
( )
Reference
PVA-H-ZSM5
30
10
144-138
568
[36]
PVA-SPTA(M4)
40
10
0.060
1991
[37]
PVHNC -2
30
10
0.3643
2241
Present
work
PVHNC -3
30
10
0.3725
VII. CONCLUSIONS
The Pervaporation results of PVHNC-2 & PVHNC-3
membranes indicates that it is possible to enhance both flux and
selectivity over that of pristine PVA membrane. The present
experimental data indicated that due to the strong intercalated
structure of PVA formed with Halloysite nanoclay (HNC)
galleries, it is possible to obtain the layered crystalline structures
in the PVA matrix. It was observed that the crystalline and
hydrophilic nature of nanoclay particles could hinder the
transport of organic components of the mixed aqueous media to
offer an easy passage to water molecules through the membranes.
An increase in flux and selectivity of the PVHNC-3 membrane
can be attributed to the increase of membrane swelling as a result
of more number of water selective sites available for such
hydrophilic hydrophilic interactions, but selectivity has
decrease due to a decrease in crystallinity in addition to increased
plasticization effect of the PVA membrane in the presence of a
large amount of water during Pervaporation technique.
The effect of change in content of HNC particles and
change in feed water concentration on flux and selectivity was
investigated for the PV dehydration of IPA from the different
water % of feed mixture. The results clearly show improved
membrane performance due to the presence of hydrophilic nature
of HNC particles and PVA. The 0.3 wt. % HNC incorporated
mixed matrix membranes have shown the better selectivity of
2423. Pervaporation (PV) through HNC incorporated membranes
provides the alternative to the industrial purification of aqueous
organic liquid mixtures. These PV experimental results of the
present study clearly explain the PV dehydration of IPA as
influenced by the amount of HNC particles incorporated into the
PVA mixed matrix membranes.
2423
VIII. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The authors thank the Department of Science and
Technology (DST) SERB, New Delhi, India, for the financial
support (L.No.SR/S1/OC-53/2012) to one of the author in the
form of DST Major Research Project.
REFERENCES
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
Chapman, P. D.; Oliveira, T.; Livingston, A. G.; Li, K. Membranes for the
dehydration of solvents by pervaporation. Journal of Membrane Science,
2008, 318, 5-37.
Huang, Z.; Shi, Y.; Wen, R.; Guo. Y. H.; Su, J. F.; Matsura, T. Multilayer
poly (vinyl alcohol)-zeolite 4A composite membranes for ethanol
dehydration by means of pervaporation. Separation and Purification
Technology, 2006, 51, 126-136.
Chapman, P. D.; Tan, X.; Livingston, A. G.; Li, K.; Oliveira, T.
Dehydration of tetrahydrofuran by pervaporation using a composite
membrane. Journal of Membrane Science, 2006,268, 13-19.
Mali, M. G.; Gokavi, G. S. Sorption and permeation studies for isopropanol
+ water mixtures using alginate based highly water selective nanocomposite
membranes. Journal of Polymer Research, 2012, 19, 9976.
Lin, W. H.; Li, Q.; Zhu, T. R. New Konjac Glucomannan-PVA Composite
Membrane for Application in Pervaporation Dehydration of Caprolactam
Solution. Chemical Engineering and Technology, 2012, 35, 1069-1076.
Uragami, T.; Mastugi, H.; Miyata, T. Pervaporation Characteristics of
Organic Inorganic Hybrid Membranes Composed of Poly (vinyl alcoholco-acrylic acid) and Tetraethoxysilane for water/Ethanol Separation.
Macromolecules, 2005, 38, 8440 - 8446.
Guo, R. L.; Hu, C. L.; Pan, F. S. PVA-GPTMS/TEOS hybrid pervaporation
membrane for dehydration of ethylene glycol aqueous solution. Journal of
Membrane Science, 2006, 281,454 462.
Zhang, Q. G.; Liu, Q. L.; Jiang, Z. Y. Anti-trade-off in dehydration of
ethanol by novel PVA/APTEOS hybrid membranes. Journal of Membrane
Science, 2007, 287, 237 - 245.
Pen, F. B.; Lu, L. Y.; Sun, H. L.; Wang, Y.; Wu, H.; Jian, Z. Correlations
between free volume characteristics and pervaporation permeability of
novel PVA-GPTMS hybrid membranes, Journal of Membrane Science,
2006,275, 97 - 104.
www.ijsrp.org
International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 6, Issue 6, June 2016
ISSN 2250-3153
[10] Sajjan, A. M.; Jeevan Kumar, B. K.; Kittur, A. A.; Kariduraganavar, M. Y.
Development of novel grafted hybrid PVA membranes using
glycidyltrimethylammonium chloride for pervaporation separation of water
isopropanol mixtures. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry,
2013,19, 427 - 437.
[11] Premakshi, H. G.; Kariduraganavar, M. Y.; Mitchell, G.R. Development of
Composite anion exchange membranes using poly(vinyl alcohol) and
silica precursor for pervaporation separation of water isopropanol
mixtures. RSC Advances, 2016, 6,11802 11814.
[12] Kahya, S.; Solak, E. K.; Sanli, O. Sodium alginate / Poly(vinyl alcohol)
alloy membranes for the pervaporation,vapour permeation and vapour
permeation with temperature difference separation of dimethylformamide /
water mixtures: A comparative study. Vacuum, 2010, 84, 1092 - 1102.
[13] Kulkarni, S. S.; Kittur, A. A.; Aralaguppi, M. I.; Kridurganavar, M. Y.
Synthesis and characterization of hybrid membranes using poly(vinyl
alcohol) and tetraethylorthosilicate for the pervaporation separation of water
isopropanol mixtures. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 2004, 94,
1304 1315.
[14] Kittur, A. A.; Tambe, S. M.; Kulkarni, S. S.; Karidurganavar, M. Y.
Pervaporation separation of water-acetic acid mixtures through NaY Zeolite
incorporated Sodium alginate membranes. Journal of Applied Polymer
Science, 2004,94, 2101 2109.
[15] Alghezawi, N.; Sanli, O.; Aras, L.; Asman, G. Separation of acetic acid
water mixtures through acrylonitrile grafted poly(vinyl alcohol) membranes
by pervaporation. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process
Internsification, 2005, 44, 51 - 58.
[16] Jiraratananon, R.; Chanachai, A.; Huang, R. Y. M.; Uttapap,
D.Pervaporation dehydration of ethanol water mixtures with chitosan /
hydroxyethylecellulose(CS / HEC) composite membranes :I.Effect of
operating conditions. Journal of Membrane Science, 2002,195, 143 - 151.
[17] Benguergoura, H.; Aouak, T.; Moulay, S. Use of pervaporation technique to
monitor the oxidation of primary alcohols: n-propanol and n- butanol,
Journal of Membrane Science, 2004,229, 107-116.
[18] Chiellini, E.; Corti, A.; Antone, S. D.; Solaro, R. Biodegradation of poly
(vinyl alcohol) based materials. Progress in Polymer Science, 2003, 28,
963- 1014.
[19] Schildtnecht,C.E.Poly(vinyl alcohol) properties and Applications, Wiley
Interscience, New York(1973).
[20] Peng. F.; Lu, L.; Sun, H.; Pan, F.; Jiang, Z. Organic Inorganic Hybrid
Membranes with Simultaneously Enhanced Flux and Selectivity. Journal of
Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 2007, 46, 2544 2549.
[21] Adoor, S. G.; Sairam, M.; Manjeshwa, L. S.; Raju, K. V. S. N.;
Aminabhavi, T. M. Sodium montmorillonite clay loaded novel mixed
matrix membrane sof poly(vinyl alcohol) for pervaporation dehydration of
aqueous mixtures of isopropanol and1,4 - dioxane. Journal of Membrane
Science, 2006, 285, 182 - 195.
[22] Liu, C.; Yang. Y. Effects of zirconium phosphate aspect ratio on the
properties of polyvinyl alcohol nanocomposites. Polymer Testing, 2009, 28,
801 - 807.
[23] Du, M.; Guo, B.; Jia, D. Newlyemerging applications of Halloysite
nanotubes : a reviw. Polymer International, 2010, 59, 574 582.
[24] Joussein, E.; Petit, S.; Churchman, J.; Theng, B.; Righi, D.; Delvaux, B.
Halloysite clay minerals a review. Clay Minerals, 2005, 40,383 - 426.
[25] Singh, B. Why Does Halloysite Roll? A New Model. Clays and Clay
Minerals, 1996, 44, 191 - 196.
[26] Lee, Y. M.; Nam. S. Y.; Ha, S. Y. Pervaporation of water / isopropanol
mixtures through polyaniline membranes doped with poly(acrylic acid).
Journal of Membrane Science, 1999,159, 41 46.
[27] Lokesh, B. G.; Krishna Rao, K. S. V.; Mallikarjuna Reddy, K.; Chowdoji
Rao,K.; Srinivasa Rao, P. Novel nanocomposite membranes of sodium
[28]
[29]
[30]
[31]
[32]
[33]
[34]
[35]
[36]
[37]
[38]
111
AUTHORS
First Author U. Sajankumar ji Rao, Department of Polymer
Science & Tech, S.K.University, Anantapuramu 515003 A.P,
India.
Second Author K.Sreenivasulu, Department of Polymer
Science & Tech, S.K.University, Anantapuramu
Third Author Y.Maruthi, Department of Polymer Science &
Tech, S.K.University, Anantapuramu
Fourth Author P. Kumara Babu, Department of Polymer
Science & Tech, S.K.University, Anantapuramu
Fifth Author G.Nagarjuna M.C.S.Subha, Department of
Chemistry, S.K.University, Anantapuramu 515003 A.P, India.
Sixth Author K. Chowdoji Rao, Department of Polymer
Science & Tech, S.K.University, Anantapuramu
www.ijsrp.org