Submitted by:
Ampoon, Arnold P.
Avila, Aiko S.
Bularon, Eunio C.
Jumangpang, Artemis O.
Manliguez, Christine Mae L.
Submitted to:
Mr. Ramie L. Bulaybulay, M.A
retirement age for all would be unfair, impracticable and absurd. It would also interfere
with the peoples freedom to enter into contracts relating to their employment.
Retirement USA is a national initiative working for a new retirement system that,
along with Social Security, will provide universal, secure, and adequate income for
future retirees.
Our retirement system is failing too many Americans. While Social Security
continues to do its part, our private pension system is not delivering what most retirees
need to provide for their basic needs.
Even before the recent economic downturn, retirement security had become a
major national concern, as companies increasingly shifted from traditional pensions to
do-it-yourself savings plans.
The faltering stock market and dwindling 401(k) accounts have turned a major
concern into a crisis, highlighting the weaknesses in our nations patchwork retirement
system.
Retirement USA has issued a call for the submission of visionary proposals for
a future private retirement income program. Selected proposals were presented at
a Re-Envisioning Retirement Security conference in Washington, D.C. on October 21,
2009.
Principles for a New Retirement System in the US
Lifetime Payouts. Benefits should be paid out over the lifetime of retirees and
any surviving spouses, domestic partners, and former spouses.
Working longer. Individuals are pushing back their retirement age both because they
need more time to save and because they enjoy many aspects of their jobs. Threequarters (76 percent) of employees say they will continue working past retirement age,
with 40 percent working because they want to and 35 percent because they will have to,
Gallup found. Part-time work in retirement (61 percent) is greatly preferred to a full-time
job (15 percent). But only 19 percent of those surveyed plan to completely stop working
at retirement age by choice.
Individuals with high salaries are the most likely to want to stick with their jobs. Nearly
half (49 percent) of those earning $75,000 or more say they plan to work past retirement
age because they want to, compared to about a third of people earning less money. In
contrast, people earning between $30,000 and $74,999 (39 percent) and especially
employees earning less than $30,000 (43 percent) are more likely to continue working
in retirement because it's necessary to maintain their standard of living.
Medicare eligibility. Qualifying for Medicare plays a big role in many people's
retirement decisions. Medicare coverage can start as early as the month you turn age
65. People who retire before age 65 face the risk of being forced to pay high premiums
for private health insurance or COBRA coverage, or even being denied health insurance
altogether. "One of the greatest retirement costs people face, even if they are healthy, is
medical care and health insurance," says Brent Neiser, a certified financial planner and
a senior director at the National Endowment for Financial Education in Denver. "You
probably do not want to get out of a reasonable health insurance situation before age 65
because if you have a gap that needs to be filled, it could be very expensive."
Higher Social Security retirement age. The increasing Social Security retirement age
may also be inspiring people to work longer. While you can sign up for Social Security
as early as age 62, your payments will be reduced unless you wait until your full
retirement age to start payments. The full retirement age is 65 for everyone born in
1937 and earlier, but has since increased to 66 for most baby boomers and will further
climb to 67 for everyone born in 1960 or later. "You are not tapping into the full potential
of Social Security if you elect to claim Social Security before age 66 because it is
significantly discounted. Some people might call it a haircut," Neiser says. "That smaller
amount adds up to thousands and thousands of dollars less throughout your lifetime."
Story
Jeanne Majors
Brooklyn, NY
On May 4th of this year I was able to leave the NYC Shelter system for a room at the
YWCA in downtown Brooklyn. How did this occur? Well, I started collecting early Social
Security retirement benefits in March of this year and I was able to move in. Prior to this,
I was in the shelter system from August 2010 because my retirement income wasn't
enough to get affordable housing in NYC without a job (full time or part time). My
savings were exhausted due to bills, transportation and helping a disabled younger
sister (who is 45) with some incidentals.
If the Republicans look to take monies from Social Security to offset the deficit, then I
can no longer afford to live at the YWCA and would have to go back to depending upon
tax-supported dollars for shelter living. At 62, (single, and African American) this would
be detrimental to my health and everything that I worked for. I retired with the thought
that some employment for seniors would be available until I could collect my Social
Security retirement benefits. Then I would be able to live somewhat comfortably.
I don't think our Congressional Representatives have any idea what it is to live on a
fixed income, let alone skip meals or do without medications. They should try it
sometime!!!!
Proposal
Retirement Security and Longevity Risk- Mark Shemtob, Abar Pension Services
Inc.
The Retirement Security and Longevity Risk proposal would provide near universal
longevity insurance protection in a cost efficient manner. The program would be
mandatory to all workers and would provide insurance to protect against the risk
individuals face in outliving their retirement savings by providing lifetime benefits
beginning at the extended longevity age. Employers, employees and the government
would share in funding the program which would be administered privately with
government oversight.