discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/6517260
CITATIONS
READS
60
306
4 authors, including:
Charlotte Jacobsen
SEE PROFILE
SEE PROFILE
Anne S Meyer
Technical University of Denmark
279 PUBLICATIONS 9,504 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
In this study fish oil was incorporated into commercial homogenized milk using different homogenization
temperatures and pressures. The main aim was to understand the significance of homogenization
temperature and pressure on the oxidative stability of the resulting milks. Increasing homogenization
temperature from 50 to 72 C decreased droplet size only slightly, whereas a pressure increase from
5 to 22.5 MPa decreased droplet size significantly. Surprisingly, emulsions having small droplets,
and therefore large interfacial area, were less oxidized than emulsions having bigger droplets.
Emulsions with similar droplet size distributions, but resulting from different homogenization conditions,
had significantly different oxidative stabilities, indicating that properties of significance to oxidation
other than droplet size itself were affected by the different treatments. In general, homogenization at
72 C appeared to induce protective effects against oxidation as compared to homogenization at 50
C. The results thus indicated that the actual composition of the oil-water interface is more important
than total surface area itself.
KEYWORDS: Fish oil; lipid oxidation; milk; emulsion; homogenization; droplet size; milk fat globule
membrane
INTRODUCTION
Table 1. Experimental Design and Resulting Droplet Size (D[3,2]) and Viscosity of Emulsions
oil
sample
homogenization
amount (wt %)
type
temp (C)
pressure (MPa)
D[3,2] (m)
caseinate (g/L)
viscosity (mPas)
Experiment 1
F_T50P5
F_T72P5
F_T50P22.5
F_T72P22.5
F_T50P15
F_T72P15
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
fish
fish
fish
fish
fish
fish
50
72
50
72
50
72
F_T50P5
F_T72P5
F_T50P22.5
F_T72P22.5
F_cas1
F_cas5
F_cas10
FR_T50P5
FR_T72P22.5
FR1%_T72P22.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.0
fish
fish
fish
fish
fish
fish
fish
fish + rapeseed
fish + rapeseed
fish + rapeseed
50
72
50
72
72
72
72
50
72
72
5
5
22.5
22.5
15
15
1.26
1.16
0.70
0.45
0.89
0.81
5
5
22.5
22.5
22.5
22.5
22.5
5
22.5
22.5
1.31
1.26
0.77
0.51
0.50
0.50
0.51
1.36
0.48
0.55
Experiment 2
1
5
10
3.9
4.1
4.1
4.0
4.0
4.7
5.2
4.0
4.0
4.0
fish oil
rapeseed and
fish oil mixture
14:0
15:0
16:0
17:0
18:0
20:0
SAT
9.9
1.0
34.3
0.5
11.7
0.0
57.4
3.7
2.0
10.8
7.7
2.2
1.5
18.2
2.0
0.3
12.0
14:1
16:1(n-7)
18:1(n-9)
18:1(n-7)
20:1(n-9)
22:1(n-11)
22:1(n-9)
MUFA
0.4
1.8
22.6
2.8
7.3
17.0
4.4
11.1
6.6
0.8
47.2
3.5
38.5
4.0
6.1
3.3
0.7
56.1
1.7
0.9
2.8
9.0
0.9
10.5
25.8
10.5
4.6
1.3
4.2
0.5
5.2
26.3
18:2(n-6)
18:3(n-3)
18:4(n-3)
20:5(n-3)
22:5(n-3)
22:6(n-3)
PUFA
PV ( 0.01) (mequiv/kg)
expt 1
expt 2
tocopherols (ppm)
Ra
27.6
2.9
0.1
3.0
0.09
0.32
330
0.09
273
146
Effect of Treatments on Droplet Sizes. Changes in temperature and pressure during homogenization affected both the
average droplet diameter (D[3,2], Table 1) and the droplet size
distribution (Figure 1) significantly. The size distributions
determined in the two experiments were identical for similar
samples; thus, only emulsions from experiment 2 are shown in
Figure 1. At low and medium pressures (5 and 15 MPa), the
unimodal distribution of the droplets tended to move only
slightly downward as temperature was increased from 50 to
72 C during homogenization (Figure 1). The average droplet
diameter was therefore only slightly affected by the temperature
during homogenization at low and medium pressures (F_T50P5
vs F_T72P5 and F_T50P15 vs F_T72P15, Table 1). Increasing
the pressure from 5 to 22.5 MPa at low temperature moved the
peak further downward, indicating that high pressure reduced
droplet size more than high temperature (F_T50P5 vs F_T50P22.5).
The largest difference was observed at both high temperature
and pressure (Table 1). By studying the droplet size distribution,
it was evident that all emulsions homogenized at high temperature and pressure were now bimodal (Figure 1). Hence, the
apparent decrease in droplet size was not caused by a general
decrease in size, but rather a result of the droplets being spilt
into two groups: one with unchanged size compared to the
emulsion homogenized at only high pressure and one group
having very small diameters (Figure 1). The emulsion containing 1% added fish oil was homogenized at both high temperature
and pressure and was also bimodal and similar to those
containing 0.5% added fish oil. However, increase in the oil
content to 1% resulted in a small decrease in the portion of the
very small droplets (FR_T72P22.5 vs FR1%_T72P22.5) and
also led to a slightly increased D[3,2].
Effect of Treatments on Oxidation. The different treatments
affected PV, concentrations of volatile oxidation products, and
the sensory evaluations of the emulsions during storage. The
overall progressions of oxidation were similar in the two storage
experiments. Differences in PV were already evident at the
beginning of the storage period. Furthermore, a significant and
increasing difference between emulsions homogenized at low
and high temperature and pressure (F_T50P5 and F_T72P22.5)
was observed regarding PV and volatiles. During storage, all
samples supplemented with neat fish oil thus had a significant
increase in PV and concentrations of 1-penten-3-one, 1-penten3-ol, 2-penten-1-ol, (E)-2-pentenal, (E)-2-hexenal, and (E,E)2,4-heptadienal (Figure 2; Table 3). At the end of the storage
experiment, the F_T50P5 emulsion had approximately twice the
amount of lipid hydroperoxides and volatiles compared to the
F_T72P22.5 emulsion (Figure 2; Table 3). Emulsions homogenized at either high temperature or high pressure had intermediate PVs (Figure 2). Overall, the PVs of the emulsions were
significantly different after 7 and 11 days in the following
order: F_T50P5 > F_T72P5 > F_T50P22.5 > F_T72P22.5.
Similar results were obtained regarding the volatiles, as
exemplified by development of (E)-2-hexenal in the emulsions
(Figure 3). After 7 days of storage, concentrations of (E)-2hexenal were significantly different in the fish oil enriched milks,
in the same order as PV. During the first 7 days, the emulsions
Figure 1. Droplet size distributions in emulsions containing fish oil or fish and rapeseed oil mixture from experiment 2. Sample names refer to Table 1.
homogenized at high temperature and low pressure had significantly higher PV and concentration of volatiles than those
homogenized at low temperature and high pressure (F_T72P5
> F_T50P22.5), but after 11 days they had similar and not
significantly different concentrations of the quantified volatiles.
The emulsions homogenized at intermediate pressure (15 MPa)
in the first experiment were located close to the emulsions
Table 3. Concentration of Selected Volatile Oxidation Products (Nanograms per Gram of Emulsion) in Emulsions from Experiment 2 after 1 and 11
Days of Storage
1-penten-3-onea
1-penten-3-ol
2-penten-1-ol
(E)-2-pentenal
(E)-2-hexenal
(E,E)-2,4-heptadienal
day 1
day 11
day 1
day 11
day 1
day 11
day 1
day 11
day 1
day 11
day 1
day 11
F_T50P5
F_T72P5
F_T50P22.5
F_T72P22.5
F_cas1
F_cas5
F_cas10
FR_T50P5
FR_T72P22.5
FR1%_T72P22.5
3.4
5.0
2.9
1.3
1.2
1.4
1.9
0.1
0.0
0.2
19.4
14.3
19.4
10.9
9.9
9.1
9.2
0.1
0.1
0.7
1.4
2.3
1.1
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
23.4
15.6
17.6
8.7
8.0
8.4
10.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
3.5
4.8
2.2
0.5
1.2
1.5
1.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
50.9
37.0
40.8
20.9
18.8
18.9
23.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.8
1.4
1.3
0.4
0.3
0.6
0.4
0.0
0.0
0.4
5.9
4.1
5.0
3.1
3.0
2.8
2.9
0.6
0.2
0.4
0.4
1.4
0.5
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
11.9
8.7
8.5
5.0
4.6
4.5
5.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.8
2.7
1.5
0.7
0.6
1.4
1.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
14.8
10.2
11.2
7.0
6.6
6.5
6.9
0.0
0.0
2.1
Average standard deviation of determinations was 0.7 ng/g of emulsion. Sample names refer to Table 1.
JF062391S