Organic, faretrade products and green marketing toward the different supermarket offer
is very important as well as the future of the green marketing. Therefore, this
dissertation has been made up of a broad illustration of Fairtrade or organic products?
The Future of Green marketing in the UK supermarkets..
The first chapter has been established to show the background, rational, research aim,
objectives and motivation of the research. The literature review chapter exploits
perception on fairtrade and organic products from supermarkets, consumer buying
decision process on fairtrade and organic products from supermarkets, power of
consumer perception and brand positioning as well as how it is working to attract
consumers in the UK. In the 3rd chapter the dissertation will show industry analysis to
meet the aim and objectives of the research. The data that the researcher collected are
analyzed, and discussed in the fifth chapter. Later, the researcher has shown that how
the result has matched with the literature views of the authors or how the result has
controversies in this chapter.
Finally, this dissertation has been concluded with giving some recommendations and
analyzing scope for further research in future.
Statement of Authenticity
I have read the rules and regulations of University of Huddersfield relating to Plagiarism
and certify that my project is on my own work and it does not contain any
unacknowledged work from any other sources.
I can assure that the word count for this research was 9000 words (approximately).
Acknowledgement
It is really a good chance for me to utilize my theoretical knowledge and understanding
practically through the dissertation. To complete this dissertation I needed support from
different people, so I should thank to them.
Without the support of the supervisor I could not complete my dissertation, therefore, I
would like to thank my supervisor Mrs. to be helpful to me. Im really grateful to
her as she provided me several feedbacks for the correction and improvement of my
dissertation during completing my study. I am going to thank the faculty members of my
department for helping me when requires.
I would like to thank my family members for supporting me in the meantime of
conducting the research. Thanks go to my friends for supporting me in designing the
research and setting the research objectives and completing the research analysis.
Finally, I want to thank each and everyone who supported and contributed in my study.
Contents
Abstract...................................................................................................................... 1
Statement of Authenticity.......................................................................................... 2
Acknowledgement...................................................................................................... 3
Chapter: One............................................................................................................. 4
Intorductions.............................................................................................................. 4
1.1.
1.2.
1.3.
1.4.
1.5.
Research aims................................................................................................... 6
1.6.
1.7.
Research question............................................................................................. 7
1.8.
1.9.
1.10.
Summery....................................................................................................... 8
Chapter 2.................................................................................................................... 9
Literature Review....................................................................................................... 9
2.1.
Introduction....................................................................................................... 9
Purchase decision..................................................................................... 14
2.3.2.
Post-purchase behaviour..........................................................................15
2.3.3.
2.4. Understanding of the brand positioning and its influence on the customers
purchasing decision for fair trade and organic products in UK supermarket............16
2.5. Finally, find out the effectiveness between the fair trade and organic products
in UK supermarkets for consumers...........................................................................20
2.6.
conclusion....................................................................................................... 22
Chapter: Three.......................................................................................................... 23
Industry Analysis...................................................................................................... 23
1.1.
Introductions................................................................................................... 23
1.2.
1.3.
1.4.
1.5.
Conclusion........................................................................................................ 27
Chapter: Four............................................................................................................ 28
Research Methodology............................................................................................. 28
4.1.
Introduction................................................................................................. 28
4.2.
Research Design.......................................................................................... 28
4.3.
Research Philosophy.................................................................................... 29
4.4.
Research Approaches...................................................................................31
4.5.
Research Strategy........................................................................................... 32
4.6.
Research Choices......................................................................................... 33
4.7.
4.8.
Data analysis.................................................................................................. 35
4.9.
4.10.
Research Ethics............................................................................................ 36
4.11.
4.12.
Summary..................................................................................................... 37
Chapter: Five.............................................................................................................. 38
Result analysis............................................................................................................ 38
1.1.
Introduction..................................................................................................... 38
1.2.
1.3.
Relationship of gender.......................................................................................... 44
Relationship of age................................................................................................ 46
1.4.
Discussion....................................................................................................... 47
1.5.
Summary........................................................................................................ 50
Chapter: Six.............................................................................................................. 51
Recommendations and Conclusions.........................................................................51
6.1.
Introduction..................................................................................................... 51
6.1.4. Recommendation on finding out the effectiveness between the fair trade
and organic products in UK supermarkets for consumers.....................................53
6.2.
6.3.
Conclusion....................................................................................................... 54
References:............................................................................................................... 55
List of Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure
List of Appendices
Chapter: One
Introductions
marketing method because it ensures the stability in the environment and effective use
of natural resources.
Peattie (2009) stated that in 1950s and before marketing was not formally recognized
or practiced in the organization but marketing theories and practices started to evolve.
According to Margolis and Lawrence (1999) the idea of green marketing came to
existence in 1980s but before that many experts argued on the fact that whether the
products and the environment are integrated part or not. From 1980s the green
marketing was practiced by some of the companies.
Information from online stated that when an international trade system tries for farmers
of developing countries to ensure better transaction condition, save them from
competitive market then it is called fairtrade. (www.supermarket.co.uk, 2011). As Benn
and Bolton states, Fairtrade is an organised social movement and market-based
approach that looks to promote the development of marginalised actors in the
production process the small farmers and plantation workers of the developing
countries. (Benn and Bolton, 2011, P. 97-98)
According to Benn and Bolton(2011) though fairtrade got the momentum from last 10
years and now it becomes one of the major growing food categories of EU and US
supermarkets, Its first started from 1960s. Burch and Lawrence (2007) ensure that from
1990s supershops of UK maintained the trading of ethical products or fairtrade. In UK,
Sainsbury has highest number of fairtrade products and turnover but the co-operative
started the fairtrade. Along with supermarkets many companies like Starbucks and
Cadbury are trading the fairtrade product. From Fairtrade Foundation (2011) it is seen
that 40% more fairtrade products were sold in 2010 than 2009 which was 1.17 billion.
And they estimated that the trade will cross 2 billion in 2012 in UK.
Engaging actively with the fairtrade business about 7.5 million poor farmers are
improving their lifestyle. Coffee, tea, bananas, chocolate, fresh vegetables, honey, nuts
and nuts oil, rice, sugar, olives and olive oil, etc are considered as the main product of
fairtrade. Fairtrade organization of different companies work under the Fairtrade
Labeling Organization International (FLO) which is a non-profit organization and
established in 1992. To create better social structure for green world it is needed to
grow fairtrade more in future as it is helpful for both the buyer and the seller countries.
Understanding of the consumer perception on the fair trade and organic products
in UK Supermarket.
Analyzing the impact of consumer purchasing decision on fair trade and organic
products.
Finally, find out the effectiveness between the fair trade and organic products in
UK supermarkets for consumers.
Consumers of UK are highly price sensitive as they are well educated and about
80% consumers are from service profession.
Researcher will be able to know about the consumer perception, buying decision
process, brand positioning, supermarkets, fairtrade, organic and green marketing by
choosing the subject area. For these reasons researcher generally choose the
subject area as it works as golden opportunity for him.
1.10.
Summery
With research aims and objectives this chapter shows the background, rational and
importance of the study. In the next chapter on the perspective of UK we will learn the
buying process of consumer on fairtrade and organic product from supermarkets, brand
positioning and consumer perception power and the perception on fairtrade and organic
products from supermarkets and also will review the current literature.
Chapter 2
Literature Review
2.1. Introduction
Consumer
perception
on
fairtrade
and
organic
perception. Although, perception and sensation is not the same thing, Jansson-Boyd
(2010) found sensation is a process of simply presented information which is interpreted
to consumers by their various senses, whereas perception connects meaning which is
attached to the sensations experienced. From existing attitudes, general disposition,
and beliefs, those meanings is collected. This later is stored in consumers memory that
information is then structured in a perceptual pattern.
Moreover, as like human philosophy, the history of perception is very old, but from the
end of 19th century modern day perception is quite related with experimental
psychology. Some psychological term (Sensory Thresholds) will be necessary to
understand consumer perception in deeply. According to Arnold and Zinkhan (2004),
firstly, if different sensory receptors of human body detected the lowest label of input,
then it will be called absolute threshold. Secondly, the differential threshold is the
capability of a sensory system, which can detect changes or variations between two
senses. Therefore, most supermarkets create massages or information above
customers threshold; then people will focus on them. But Solomon (2010) reviewed
some differentiality that subliminal perception happens when the sensory system is
under the level of customers awareness. Fulberg (2003) added although, the
supermarkets environment gives many opportunities to marketers to play with
consumers stimuli or senses, in order to develop or maintain their good relationship
with brands.
Perceiving
Illustration creation by
through/Stimuli
Vision
Sound
Smell
Taste
smell.
from many marketers, blind test has shown the importance of
brand image.
Touch
Supermarket
consumers
frequently
touch
their
product,
Solomon described that, exposure is the degree to which people notice a stimulus that
is within range of their sensory receptors. Consumers concentrate on certain stimuli, are
unaware of others, and even go out of their way to ignore some messages. (Solomon,
2006, p.47). Adaptation frequently affects exposure; some factors which create
adaptation are:
Morrion and Rathneshwar (2000) analysed that when consumers see familiar or famous
brand name then their attention increase and it also improves the chance for purchasing
that brand again. Jansson-Boyd (2010) has argued that all the sensory receptors have
the power to get consumers attention. Some heavily exercise methods are, buying or
keeping large blocks of advertising or shelf space, and advertising on the backside of
trolleys especially to get consumer attention in the supermarkets. Evans et al. (2009)
described four aspects of attention:
held.
Leading attention: must be followed the message.
Distracting attention: it only needed if the message is weak.
Even though, Jansson-Boyd (2010) approached supermarket can gain attention
through, colour, novelty, personal relevance and preferences, brand identity, and
influence of mass media. Most studies in this field have recognized by Lewis (2008) that
there is no uncertainty that colour is quite helpful to get consumer attention, and
consumers generally spot colourful products. Jansson et al (2009) added that it would
be easy for green products, if they use green colour for their packaging, but green
colour is using on many conventional products packaging with other basic colours
(white, red, black, pink, blue, yellow, orange, brown, and grey) in the supermarket for
getting consumer attention easily. It would be hard for marketers by using colour as an
attention-grabbing or persuasive technique. After that, to get consumer attention for
creating perception, novel elements can be one of the major ways. Researchers like
Berns et al (2007) found that certain areas of human brain respond to novel elements
without awareness. For creating attention through supermarkets' environmental issues
and good quality product characteristics, supermarkets in the UK, organic and fair-trade
products are using novelty. At home (2010) described that Sainsburys as UK
supermarket chain works with milk farmers to reduce carbon footprints, it has the
highest number of fair-trade products, one of the largest number of organic products,
and it as well as helped some other novelty causes (food sourcing, sustainability,
electric vehicles for transport, packaging, recycle, waste management). As a result,
Sainsburys get the highest market share within all groceries market share. Even, Tesco,
the market leader of the UK supermarket chain, started focus on novel element of their
business since 1997, in order to do that Tesco promised more own brand product and
less packaging for consumer.
Chernev (2007) indicated that, consumers who have a personal relevance or preference
for a product pay much more attention on that particular products information. Gendron
et al (2009) indicates that fair-trade is becoming a strong social movement which runs
by green or ethical consumers. Especially, fairtrade is becoming a social movement
within the UK consumers and more than 500 towns of UK are turned as Fairtrade town.
In addition, Jansson-Boyd (2010) wanted to place argument that brand identity can be
quite supportive for making customers to notice certain types of products. To formation
a good product attitude toward that particular product to consumers, the mass media
could be helpful. In order to grow good public perception toward their products,
supermarkets, fair-trade and organic are using lots of media attention. After attention,
here consumer decides what things really matter, interpretation is very essential for
consumer perception. It can be different from people to people when people perceive
the stimuli, and the meanings of those stimuli are various as well.
2.3.1.
Purchase decision
Purchase decision is the most important stage of consumer buying decision process.
Green consumer will spend money on fair-trade or organic products in this stage.
2.3.2.
Post-purchase behaviour
Green or ethical consumer may reuse the whole product or part of the product.
packaging.
Finally, green consumer may focus on their lifespan and health beneficiary issues
2.3.3.
Influential other factors for making purchase
decision
Jansson-Boyd (2010) and Peattie (1995) signposted that, many other factors
would change or persuade consumer to make purchase decision making, for instance;
The buying decision making can be influenced by rational economic status (price
decision.
On the consumers consumption social factors (Boycott and fairtrade movement)
make great difference.
On green consumption, life stages and styles are making massive effect.
Odin et al (2001) included that brand loyal customers always have a great bond,
On buying decision making process, family value and education also can make
impact.
2.4. Understanding
of
the
brand
positioning
and
its
Most people think through Ries and Trout, positioning first started in the 1972. Whereas,
Christopher and green (1976) first talked about brand positioning in their three types of
positioning (Market segmentation, Purpose positioning, and Brand positioning).
However, Nilson (1998) debated that long before the birth date of Christ, the origin of
brand has been found, and first sign of brand was the oil lamps manufactured by the
Greek islands. But because of the rapid technology advances, globalization and
creating competitive advantages influenced companies to create their brand; modern
days of brand came in the early 1990s.
More than 10,000 different types of brands are kept on shelf or display by average
supermarkets. That means, a consumer has to categorize more than 10,000 different
brand names in their mind if he/she wants to buy a brand that time. It is analysed that
this is very difficult for ordinary consumer, but if that particular brand has created a
positioning in consumer mind, then consumer can easily remember that name and
purchase that brand.
Lewis (2009) mentions that typical supermarkets in the UK has four types of brands,
such as;
Premium brands (e.g. Tesco Premium Kitten Cuts in jelly with Duck, Asda Red
coffee)
No-Frills brands (e.g. Asda Smartprice apple juice, Tesco value washing up
liquid)
Furthermore, Solomon (2010) pointed out that, to create brand positioning in the
marketplace, marketers may use different dimensions. To create a strong positioning,
some bigwig brands are being used by different dimensions of brand positioning, such
as;
good value.
Competitors: Nordstroms position retail service as highest level.
Occasions: McDonalds positioning their brand as food and fun.
Quality: FedEx created their brand position through quality of services.
Users: Levis position their brand on users types. (Solomon, 2010)
Whereas, Davis (2010) outlined green brand positioning strategy for marketers. Those
issues are;
For any green product or brand, Evans (2009) attempted to show it is essential to
identify their primary benefit, then it will be easy for them to get market share. Oksanen
and Evans (2009) suggested that the primary benefit of fairtrade or ethical brand is
related with fair payment of products or labour. Whereas, Solomon (2010) indicated that
organic products primary benefit is to maintain ecological balance (environmental
friendly) during production.
Devis (2008) focuses on organic brand distribution process in the supermarkets, and
mentioned it is not very well received by green consumers, because to sell some low
quality organic products, sometimes supermarkets were using green wash. Whereas,
Evans (2009) suggested that green consumers like the way supermarkets are
distributing fairtrade products, because fairtrade brand is very strict to its quality and
ethical standard. Even though, Fillion (2007) stated that if they focus on environmental
benefit of their brand, fair-trade and organic products will get better brand positioning.
Nevertheless, for green brands labelling (logo) is very important. In the UK, fairtrade
label is quite familiar and all fair-trade products have one labelling (logo). Whereas,
Jones (2010) indicated that in the UK supermarkets, many types of organic brand
labelling are available, this makes consumer confused to choose the right organic
products.
important part for supermarkets and green consumers. Because, here consumer will
compare, contrast and select from organic or fairtrade products. Gendron et al (2009)
suggested for evaluating of alternatives every individual consumer always look
differently, such as:
Criteria: The standards and specifications used to compare different products and
brands (organic or fair-trade).
Importance: ethical issues, environmental effects, reliability, test of that products, review
from consumers and strong brand image is very effective.
Evoked set of alternatives: almost every major brand want to come here, if brands are
here then they can get customer. Among all green products, organic and fairtrade
products are almost first in the UK consumer evoked set from supermarkets.
Criteria
Importance
Evaluate
alternatives
on criteria
Evoked set
of
Combine
information
Select
alternative
Green consumer and general consumer almost follow the same strategy. Smithers
(2011) published paper as to the literature that if they find organic product then they
want to buy organic products. Whereas, Benn and Bolton (2011) described that
consumer choose fairtrade products, especially grocery food items and cloths are
rapidly growing demand categories for supermarkets consumers.
The following chapter, the researcher will explain different types of research methods,
as well the researcher will select the appropriate methods to achieve all objectives and
aims of this research.
2.6. Conclusion
From above explanation, it is clear to understand the UK consumers perception on
fairtrade and organic products from supermarkets, consumer buying decision making
and those influencing factors, and brand positioning of fairtrade and organic products in
the supermarkets.
The following chapter, the researcher will explain different types of research methods,
as well the researcher will select the appropriate methods to achieve all objectives and
aims of this research.
Chapter: Three
Industry Analysis
1.1. Introductions
Comprehensive study of Becchetti and Roasti (2008) focuses on the Fair trade brand
perceptions. From their study it is seen that consumer mainly demand for fair trade
because of the corporate social responsibility (CSR) and corporate values of the brand.
Moore (2011) stated that corporate values should come first in consumer minds and for
building positive marketing image fair trade invested huge amount. There are some
Common Code for the Coffee Community Association (4c) through which the The British
Coffee Association, represents the UK coffee trade and industry, promotes social
responsibility and sustainability in environment. It influences many major firms along
with Nestle UK Ltd and Kraft Food. Fair trade has significantly implications on the
traditional coffee vendors for socially responsible branding. The Fair-trade Foundation
(2010) reported that fair trade marks ensures better deal for the producers of developing
countries and it is well known by about 65% people in UK. there are few firms who
target the socially concerned consumers so the fair trade dominate that market segment
and sizeable corporation has became it's main competitors. With socially responsible
and sustainable strategies the traditional vendors not only approached coffee but also
wine, tea, clothes and other products.
1.2.
Farmers and workers of the developing world get the concentration of fair-trade for
better prices, good working condition, local sustainability, and fair terms of trade etc.
The discrimination of conventional trade towards poorest, weakest produces is
addressed by the fair-trade and it ensures that the company will pay the sustainable
price which will not be lower than market price. For these help of fair-trade they can
improve their lifestyle. 3000 products are for sale through retail and catering outlets in
the UK which are licensed by fair-trade.
The UK market reached approximately retail value of 493 million; generally UK market
is doubling in every 2 years. From another market UK is more awareness about
fairtrade and it is also one of the largest fair trade markets in the world. Nearly 20% of
roast and ground coffee and bananas that are sold in UK are fairtrade. Some
internationally accepted criteria's are set for following products and there is a list of
approved producers which are maintained by a FLO register.
Food products: Bananas, Cocoa, Coffee, Dried Fruit, Fresh Fruit & Fresh Vegetables,
Honey, Juices, Nuts/Oil Seeds/Oil, Quinoa, Rice, Sugar, Tea, Wine
Non-food products: Beauty products, Cotton, Cut Flowers, Ornamental Plants, Sports
Balls
1.3.
The UK supermarkets have been outperforming, on the contrary, in recent months have
seen faster than Tesco profits fall even. Now, it has been said by the managing director
that to extend its existing price match guarantee it was capitalizing tens of millions of
pounds. This was their equivalent of John Lewiss never knowingly undersold pledge
that has been said by him. the squeeze on living standards is probably prompted the
move in double dip recession-hit Britain. as a result, shoppers increasingly was keen to
hunt down the lowest pricesas well as discount vouchers. Industry sales volumes are
falling for the sake of Higher food and fuel prices. Meanwhile:
- Market share has been lost by Morrisons recently, it was suggested and was being
outgunned in a voucher war at the checkout.
-In the last month Tesco has announced a 1bn investment in its UK chain when sales
and profits has been fallen, offered 10 off a 80 groceries shop.
-Brand Match is being run by Sainsbury. It is generating coupons at the till for the
purpose of purchasing branded goods elsewhere. Tesco is larger compared to Waitrose
(where the market share of Tescos 30.7% compared with 4.5%) and to shake off its
reputation it has been sought for being expensive by running more advancements as
well as hosting its the range of budget essentially.
Promotion of green marketing has got more attention than other areas. The Federal
Trade Commission (FTC) had to provide guidelines to understand the words
"recyclable", "degradable" and "environmentally friendly" in environmental advertising
because of rapid growth of the green advertising concept in late 1980s. To prevent any
short of deception the qualities and other important issued should be disclosed.
Organization should clear the fact that whether the environmental issues are applied in
products or packaging or component of either. And the claim of environmental
sustainability of products or package should be qualified.
1.4.
While large competitors are targeting Fairtrades market segment, it still displays strong
growth in the UK market - not just financially, but key distribution contracts with major
supermarkets. In 2009, Sainsburys, The Co-Op, Morrisons, and Tesco all made major
commitments to distribute products and transfer existing products to the Fairtrade
certification (Fairtrade Foundation 2010, p.5). Producers and Caf establishments like
Cadburys and Starbucks also transferred to branded products. This signals a highly
significant expansion of the brand. Some product sales have shown particularly rapid
growth - cocoa grew 93% to 3.6 million kilograms and sugar up by 53% to 69.3 million
kilograms over the year.
Cocoa and the honey part of all sugar containing product were represented by the
figures including the review of 2009, historical figures and updated sales value. By not
making other category the figure covered the fairtrade commodities. Vegetables, pulses,
dried fruit, rice, sesame seeds, quinoa, oils and nuts, spices and sports balls are those
commodities.
though some households are budget conscious and keep their eyes on the expenditure
bills, still they have spend 12 per cent more in 2011 than 2010 on fairtrade products.
The consumers are ready to pay more for the better deal of foreign farmers and it can
be understand as UK sales of Fairtrade goods is 1.3bn. The trend of decline of Great
Britain retail market has been bucked by fairtrade products as it sales was 1.32bn in
2011, compared to 1.17bn in 2010 and fairtrade foundation launches its annual
promoting period of time on Monday.
1.5.
Conclusion
Serious level of concerns is possessed by the UK external environment for fair trade.
UK government is stable with policy to remove deficit and the early splinters are likely to
worsen at the time of writing the report. Though the survey used a small and nongeneralized sample, its brand positioning reflects that as an organization with strong
corporate values has succeeded. Free market thinktank show that about 0.01% of food
and drinks sales worldwide are as fair trade.
Chapter: Four
Research Methodology
4.1. Introduction
This chapter requires a detail focus on the research questions, which was
presented in the chapter 1. Research methodology is a combination of knowledge, with
help of this the researcher easily can explain and analyse questions of the research,
and discuss different methods and potentials for advance research (Miller, 2008). This
chapter is based on research questions different methods and strategies, such as,
researcher utilizes descriptive, deductive, interpretive, inductive, analytical, and mixed
methods to take appropriate and sensible decision with view to conduct the research.
Even, this chapter will give the detail explanation that why the researcher choose
certain types of methods, and how those methods will help to fulfil this research
objectives and aim. Finally, this chapter also discuss the data collection methods, such
as; interview and questionnaire to the supermarkets consumers.
Figure (4) different types of research approaches are depicted and from it the
researcher can select any suitable study approach to conduct this research.
Many authors and writers described research philosophy and their elements in
their research (Jha, 2008)). It is a certain belief of the researcher for collecting and
analysing the research data (Sachdeva, 2009). Gaillet (2012) indicate that research
philosophy has two primary alternatives; positivist philosophy and phenomenological
philosophy (Figure- 5).
The positivist paradigm suppose that the behavioural relationships of human being can
be predicted and described with regard cause and results (May, 2007). Positivist
paradigm thinks that all data should be collected in the certain social environment for
predicting the behaviour. Even, the data collection technique of positivist paradigm
includes survey, experiments, and observations and includes the systematic data
analysis to get best possible result and to examine the hypothesis (Gomm, 2008)).
Although, the primary aim of this types of research is depend on the theory test
formulation for generating result from large number of population. If that theory fails,
then new theory will be formulated in order to replace the testing order.
The overall research was conducted in the business organization rather than
laboratory.
The collected data were high quality in nature and the researcher involvement
As described the research objectives in the chapter 1, the best philosophy for this
research is positivism philosophy because, this research will help to know current trend
of consumer buying behavior in UK supermarket, their point of view for buying the
particular types of product from the supermarkets in the UK.
4.4. Research Approaches
The researcher used both deductive and inductive approach in this research, in
order to acquire the objectives of this research. Many writers and authors have been
indicated about the selection of deductive and inductive approach for achieving the
research objectives (Flick, 2011).
Yeboah state deductive research approach as, a study in which a conceptual and
theoritical structure is developed which is then tested by empirical observation; thus
particular instances are deducted from general influences. (Yeboah, 2010, p.19). This
approach clearly explained that how the researcher focuses on the particular ways
rather than general ways for solving the research problems.
Whereas, Yeboah describe inductive research approach as, a theory which is
developed from the observation of empirical reality; thus general inferences are induced
from particular instances, which is the reverse of the deductive method since it involves
moving from individual observation to statements of general patterns or laws. (Yeboah,
2010, p.13).
However, Gaillet (2012) and Sanger (2012) contradict both deductive and inductive
approach can be explained in the particular research. Even, Perry (2001) suggests this
research approach used pure induction (theory formulating) to pure deduction (theory
examining).
Figure 6: The 3 Ways for mixing qualitative and quantitative data methods
Source: (Jha, 2008))
In this research, the researcher used quantitative method for data collection and
analyzing processes. the researcher used survey questionnaire qualitative data
collection process. The researcher used quantitative method as questionnaire. In
questionnaire the researcher tried to find out of the perception on fairtrade and organic
products from supermarket, with influencing power of consumer perception, consumer
buying decision process on fairtrade and organic products from supermarkets, and
brand positioning and the way of attracting consumers in the UK. At the end, the data
collected for this research has been mixed together for acquiring the research
objectives.
Although, this method has many advantages, and the disadvantages of this method can
be reverse into advantages for the research. But, there are some limitations observe in
this method, where the researcher will focus more and try to solve those limitations.
Data collection methods are quite significant for completing any research. All
questions of the research have to answer with the support of data collected, which the
researcher collected through this research. Sanger (2012) indicates that data collection
methods can use secondary or primary or combination of both. Even though, Axinn et
al. (2006) believe that mixed method (primary and secondary) will help the researcher to
find more concise and precise information about the research questions.
Furthermore, there are many different ways to collect data from the case study
research. Some of them are; questionnaire (primary), journal articles, newspaper
articles, and company annual reports from company websites. Author like Yeboah
(2010) contradicts about different sorts of methods can be utilized for data collection for
the research.
order to find answer for research question which helped to fulfil research objectives.
Moreover, in chapter 5, the researcher used result analysis to get quantitative data from
survey.
4.12. Summary
This chapter focus on various methods available for the research and it clearly
mentioned that, which types of methods will be appropriate to fulfil this research. Even,
it is clear that this research was based on the phenomenological research. In addition,
this research mix the non-empirical and empirical research approach, and deduction
and induction methods are using combine as well. However, this research conducted
as exploratory research and various data collection and analysing methods and
technique have been explained. The following chapter of this research will discuss
about the data collection result and analysis.
Chapter: Five
Result analysis
5.1. Introduction
Full result of analysis and description about the qualitative and quantitative
collected data will be presented by the researcher in this chapter. For analyzing the data
the researcher needed to take help from result analysis. To decide, whether the fairtrade
and organic products are more helpful for green marketing or not, the data will help and
will be able to determine the future of Green marketing in the UK supermarkets. The
data, collected from consumers, are summarized for more analysis.
In this part, researcher presents the frequency table in the appendix(7) and the
bar
chart in the appendix (8) and appendix (6) of all questionnaire. the customers of
supermarkets answer the questionnaire. To achieve the objectives and aim of the
research those bar chart can help him.
Consumer perception, brand positioning, consumer buying decision on fairtrade
and
organic product and the impact of green marketing on UK supermarkets are the subject
matter of the study. Researcher tried to collect information from different consumers
from supermarkets and got 57 respondents from the customers. At first some general
question about age, gender etc. were asked by the researcher. 54% of total
respondents were female. According to many scholars generally female consumers buy
more from supermarkets.
Valid
Male
Fema
Frequen
cy
Percent
26
45.6
31
54.4
Valid
Cumulativ
Percent
e Percent
45.6
45.6
54.4
100.0
le
Total
57
100.0
100.0
Frequen
cy
Percent
Valid
Percent
Cumulativ
e Percent
Valid
2020
35.1
35.1
35.1
30
3116
28.1
28.1
63.2
40
419
15.8
15.8
78.9
50
517
12.3
12.3
91.2
60
60+
5
8.8
8.8
100.0
Total
57
100.0
100.0
Figure 8:Frequency table on total 57 responses age groups.
'If they often shop in supermarkets stores?'' when the question was asked about 79%
that means 45 people answered yes and 5 people made no comment.
Valid
Yes
No
No
commen
ts
Total
Frequen
cy
Percent
45
78.9
7
12.3
5
8.8
Valid
Percent
78.9
12.3
Cumulativ
e Percent
78.9
91.2
8.8
100.0
57
100.0
100.0
Figure 9: Frequency table on faretrade and organic product perception
With the scholar suggested some names (Q4) of the supermarket, the researcher asked
another question on which are their favorite supermarkets are. 26% vote was for Mark
and Spencer. 6 tick marks was for ASDA and the favorite supermarkets of 3
respondents was not in the suggested list.
Q. 4
Valid
Frequen
cy
Percent
9
15.8
Valid
Cumulativ
Percent
e Percent
15.8
15.8
Tesco
Marks and
15
26.3
26.3
Spencer
Sainsbury
11
19.3
19.3
Morison
13
22.8
22.8
ASDA
6
10.5
10.5
Others
3
5.3
5.3
Total
57
100.0
100.0
Figure 10: frequency table on favourites supermarkets
42.1
61.4
84.2
94.7
100.0
At the time of knowing about the perception of fairtrade products the statement was that
fairtrade mean ethical business transaction, where farmers or labors get fair price. After
analyzing the result (Q5) the researcher will get that 33 respondents agreed with the
statement but 14 consumers think that sometimes it does unethical job and the farmers
don't get fair price. Another statement was that the fairtrade products do not harm
environment. Positive feedback came from 33 respondents on the other hand 14
thought different perception about fairtrade products. By analyzing (Q4, Q5, Q6) it is
seen that consumer's perception was similar with literature reviews of consumer
Valid
Strongly
agree
Agree
Neither
Agree or
Disagree
Disagree
Strongly
Disagree
Total
Frequen
cy
Percent
Valid
Percent
Cumulativ
e Percent
15
26.3
26.3
26.3
18
31.6
31.6
57.9
15.8
15.8
73.7
10
17.5
17.5
91.2
8.8
8.8
100.0
57
100.0
100.0
The researcher asked for the availability of the information in the supermarkets. 15
respondents did not comment but 29 respondents disagreed with the statement. Major
participants were influced by consumer buying decision making process on fairtrade
products from the Q9 and Q10. which are similar with literature review of consumer
perception on organic product.
Understanding of the brand positioning and its influence on the customers
purchasing decision for fair trade and organic products in UK supermarket
For brand positioning the first question was, if fairtrade product is available they
will choose fairtrade product. Gendron et al (2009) that as a problem recognition matter
and that why consumers of UK are buying fairtrade products. In this analysis 33
participants agreed or strongly agreed and 11 participants did not comment.
The
second statement (Q12) was that consumers will pay fair price for fairtrade products
from supermarkets. Here 8 respondents were confused and 13 were disagreed to this
statement and 36 were willing to pay fair price. The third questions were about the
impressions of fair-trades corporate values is very good. 32 agreed or strongly agreed
and 8 respondents were confused about the question.
it was clear that major proportion of respondents were influenced by Brand positioning
of fairtrade products are attracting more consumers, from Q11, Q12 and Q13
Find out the effectiveness between the fair trade and organic products in UK
supermarkets for consumers
Effectiveness between fairtradeor organic products will be discussed here. Two logics
were used her. In first statement (Q14), 14 consumers strongly agreed and 17 were
agreed and 11 respondents disagreed with the quality of the fairtrade. In the frequency
table analysis (Q15), seek to know the impressions of how convenient to purchase
fairtrade products. though 15 consumers were disagreed but 33 consumers agreed and
strongly agreed with the statement.
5.3.
With help of descriptive statistics the chi-square analysis has done and overall results
were in Appendix (8). To find solution for future green marketing the researcher tried to
find various dimensions of organic and fairtrade products. So performance will be
compared with the given results of respondents.
The researcher should have clear idea and he calculated mean and standard deviation
for green marketing. These results will help the researcher to identify and understand
the relation between each section.
Atributes- 1: Relationship with consumer perception on the fair
Test Statistics
Q6
Chi-Square
Q7
Q8
Df
Asymp. Sig.
.473
.249
.278
Q. 06
Chi-Square Tests
Pearson ChiSquare
Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
Value
3.533(a
)
3.761
.057
Asymp.
Sig. (2sided)
df
4
.473
.439
.811
57
a 5 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.19.
Q.07
Chi-Square Tests
Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
Value
3.533(a)
3.761
4
4
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.473
.439
.811
df
.057
57
a 5 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.19.
Q.08
Chi-Square Tests
Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
Value
5.088(a)
5.172
.138
4
4
Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.278
.270
.710
df
57
a 5 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.28.
Test Statistics
Q11
ChiSquare
Q12
16.565(a 9.437(a)
)
Q13
25.278(a)
df
16
16
Asymp.
Sig.
.414
.307
.065
Result: Since the significance p <0.05, the null hypothesis have been rejected.
The researcher found that the effective and valid relationship of consumers was about
45% medium from the analysis.
That the relationship of the consumers age was not valid was understood from the table
that the respondents agreed. It is being cleared that for valid relationship of consumers
with the product, supermarkets failed to utilize the resources and time.
Even the participants consented that they do not satisfy with the information of the
supermarkets that might lose their consumers in future to the competitors. It is
necessary for the organization to schedule the task in a proper way and according to
the current trends in the market, it is necessary to satisfy the customer needs in order to
avoid it.
Company need to ensure more credible fair price payment system that is responded by
the most of the consumers to the questions. What will help the supermarkets to improve
towards the high scale, the company need to take those proper steps and follow those
steps.
Researcher found that the company needs to focus on some of the areas of SCM
activities where there performance is ineffective with the help of statistical analysis. In
order to improve the scale level to high standards, they need to take appropriate steps.
Where there is ineffective performance, the organizations should focus on some of the
areas of faretrade and green marketing is showed by the statistical analysis. If they
want to improve the scale level to high standards, they need to take appropriate steps.
That the organization need to improve in faretrade products should more focus on
environmental issues, making available all important information to the consumers and
environment friendly transportation is showed by the frequency table and chi square.
5.4. Discussion
Discussion on Consumer perception about fairtrade and organic products
To understand UK consumer's perception on fairtrade and organic products from
supermarkets is the 1st objective of this research. Many scholars like; Jansson-Boyd,
(2010); Peattie, (1992); Ranchhod and Gurau, (2007); and Oyewole, (2001); discussed
about consumer perceptions on fairtrade, organic products and green marketing in the
UK supermarket (chapter 2).
The researcher discussed many authors point of views in the chapter 2, and analysed
qualitative and quantitative data from consumers (chapter 5) in order to find out the
supermarkets consumer perception about fairtrade products.
In the literature review section, Oksanen and Uusitalo (2004) indicated that fairtrade
focus on fair payment and ethical business transaction. As Oksanen and Uusitalo
described, in the chapter 4, the researcher found that maximum number of respondents
from quantitative data analyzed, as well as qualitative data analyzed felt the same way.
In the literature review section, Raynolds (2000) focused on environmental issues with
fairtrade products. The researcher found Raynolds's statement is supported by 33
participants, but there is a large number of participants, almost 15 participants did not
support that statement.
However, in the chapter 2, Gendron et al. (2009) suggested that fairtrade is becoming a
social movement in the UK. As Gendron et al. explained in the chapter 2, the highest
number of participants thought the same way in this research. Only few participants had
shown different points of view.
To summarise, as many literature explained in earlier chapter, the researcher found that
consumers have the correct perception on fairtrade products.
To understand the brand positioning and its influence on the customers purchasing
decision for fair trade and organic products in UK supermarket was the objective of this
research. Many authors like; Regm (2001); Raynolds (2002) discussed about green
brand positioning.
In the chapter 2, the primary benefit of fairtrade brand is giving fair price for products
was explained by Oksanen and Uusitalo (2004). Similarly, in this research, the primary
benefit of fair-trade brand was understood by 33 respondents. Raynolds (2002)
suggested in the literature review section that consumers liked fairtrade products
distribution process through supermarkets. Even, the researcher found similarity with
Raynolds statement in this research. Because of fairtrade products, 32 participants liked
supermarkets distribution process.
However, in this research, 67% of respondents easily recognized the label of fairtrade
products. In the literature review section, fairtrade Foundation (2011) mentioned that
fairtrade logo can be recognized by UK consumers easily. To conclude, it was clear that
brand positioning of fairtrade products from supermarkets attracted major proportion of
respondents.
5.5. Summary
In this chapter, the researcher explained about qualitative and quantitative collected
datas result and analysis. Then, the researcher found about all answers from questions,
and those are primary researched result and analysis.
The following chapter, the researcher will discuss all those answers and make some
recommendations.
Chapter: Six
Recommendations and Conclusions
6.1. Introduction
According to the findings and results of study as well as result analysis (chapter5) data will recommend in this chapter so that it can fulfil these research objectives.
After that, some recommendations will be made as to future research scope for the
sake of improving the current situation between fairtrade and organic products along
with the future of green marketing in the UK supermarkets.
6.1.1.
Recommendations on Consumer perception about
fairtrade and organic products
Some participants have lack of knowledge within the all participants about
6.1.2.
Recommendations
on
the
impact
of
consumer
6.1.3.
Recommendations on fairtrade brand positioning in
the UK supermarkets
6.1.4.
Recommendation on finding out the effectiveness
between the fair trade and organic products in UK
supermarkets for consumers
There was very little chance to be specific in some factors like current trends in
organic and faretrade merchandise furthermore as advanced steps to travel for
is obtainable here.
Moreover, the research worker has solely taken questionnaires from the workers.
There are scopes of concluding in-depth interviews from the managers on each
As the scholar has notice wide variations in some answers of the similar queries from
varied respondents, he believes that an extra analysis on this issue are going to be a lot
of correct.
6.3. Conclusion
The researcher found from all quantitative and qualitative information analysis that
consumer perceptions in different types of fairtrade and organic products, the influence
of consumer purchasing decision on fair trade and organic products, brand positioning.
Then, how it influences on the customers purchasing decision for fair trade and organic
products in UK supermarket and the effectiveness between the fair trade and organic
products in UK supermarkets for consumers are also discovered in this dissertation.
Firstly, the researcher found from this dissertation firstly that majority number of
consumers perception about fairtrade products were ethical business transaction where
farmers or labours get fair price as well as they do not harm environment; and it is
becoming social movement in the UK. All those perception about fairtrade products
were supported by various scholars in chapter one. Secondly, this analysis found that
organic product perceptions inside participants were; stable and environmental friendly
approach of production; take a look at higher than industrial merchandise; and dear
than industrial products. Those specific shopper perception results were positive,
therefore consumers perception concerning organic and fairtrade merchandise was
correct.
Thirdly, fairtrade products consumer buying decision process was influenced by farmers
who do not get fair price for their product. Consumers are not getting proper information
so much available in the supermarkets as long as they pay fair price types of
perception. So, from result analysis and literatures statements, this research found
positive result. Finally, fairtrade brand positioning can attract more supermarkets going
consumer. More supermarkets going consumer can be attracted by organic brand
positioning. Those two were tested by the researcher and found the objectives were
correct.
References:
Ajzen, I. (2008). Consumer attitudes and behaviour, In C.P. Haugtvedt, P.M. Herr &
F.R. Kardes (Eds.), Handbook of consumer psychology (pp. 525 548), New York:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Anderson, S.J. McCandless, P.M. Klausner, k. Taketa, R. and Yerger, B.V. (2011)
'Tobacco Documents Research Methodology' BMJ Publishing Group, Vol 20, issue
ii8-II11
Arnold, E.,Price, L.& Zinkhan, G., (2010) '' How Green Is Your Supermarket? ,
[online] Available at: <http://www.athomemagazine.co.uk/green-a-eco/3040-howgreen-is-your-supermarket> [Accessed 3rd August 2011]
Benn, S. and Bolton, D. (2011) Key Concepts in Corporate Social Responsibility,
London: SAGE
Burch, D. and Lawrence, G. (2007) Supermarkets and Agri-food Supply Chains :
Transformations in the Production and Consumption of Foods . Cheltenham :
Edward Elgar
Centre for Retail Research (2010) 'Retail Ethics and Green Retailing 2011: More
Than
Plastic
Bags?,
[online]
Available
at:
at:
<http://www.ethicalconsumer.org/buyersguides/food/supermarkets.aspx> [Accessed
17th August 2011]
Evans, M., Jamal, A. & Foxall, G., (2009) Consumer Behaviour. 2nd ed. Chichester:
John Wilely & Sons Ltd.
Fairtrade Foundation (2011) 'Fairtrade Sales Soar to Well Over 1bn Showing the
UK
Still
Cares
in
Tough
Times'
[online]
Available
at:
<http://www.fairtrade.org.uk/press_office/press_releases_and_statements/february_
2011/fairtrade_sales_soar_to_well_over_1bn_showing_the_uk_still_cares_in_tough
_times.aspx> [Accessed 17 August 2011]
Fillion, L. Arazi, S. (2007) 'Does Organic Food Taste Better? a Claim Substantiation
Approach' Nutrition & Food Science, Vol 32, Part: 4: p. 155 [online] Available at:
<http://www.emeraldinsight.com/journals.htm?articleid=866175&show=abstract>
[Accessed 20th August 2011]
Flick, U. (2011) Introducing Research Methodology: a Beginner's Guide to Doing a
Research Project. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications
Gaillet, L.L. (2012) Forming Archival Research Methodologies, Horsham West
Sussex, UK: Global Media
Gendron, C., Bisaillon, V., and Rance, A. (2009) 'The Institutionalization of Fair
Trade: More Than Just a Degraded Form of Social Action ' Journal of Business
Ethics,
Vol
86,
Part:
1:
p.
64
[online]
Available
at:
at:
<http://www.greenwisebusiness.co.uk/news/uk-green-product-sales-
Lawrence, F. (2009) Not on the Lable: What Reality Goes Into the Food on Your
Plate. London: penguin
Lewis, M.S. (2009) 'Supermarket Shopping' The Downshift Challenge, [online]
Available
at:
<http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/shopping/cheap-supermarket-
at:
<http://www.statistics.gov.uk/cci/nugget.asp?id=6>
[Accessed
22
August 2011]
Ottman, J. A., Stafford, E.R. and Hartman, C.L. (2006) Avoiding green marketing
myopia: ways To improve consumer appeal for environmentally preferable products,
Environment, 48,(5) pp.22-36.
Pride, W.M. and Ferrell, O.C. (2006) Marketing: Concepts and Strategies, Boston:
Houghton Mifflin Company
Regmi, A. (2011) Changing Structure of Global Food Consumption and Trade.
Washington: U.S. Department of Agriculture
Ries, A. and Trout, J. (2007) Positioning: the Battle For Your Mind. 20th anniversary
ed. London: McGraw-Hill
Ries, A. and Trout, J. (2010) Positioning : the Battle For Your Mind. London:
McGraw-Hill
N.
(2012)
'Identity
Constructions;
Feminist
Research
B.
(2010)
Consumer
Society:
Critical
Issues
and
Environmental
This is a survey to explore and analyze the future of green marketing in the UK
supermarkets. I would expect your honest and impartial participation to achieve an
exclusive unbiased outcome. All the information will be used for academic purpose and
kept under strict confidence.
Please go through the following text to know what the questionnaire is about and
answer the following questions:
1. What is your gender?
O Male
O Female
O Yes
O No
O No comments
O Tesco
O Marks and Spencer
O Sainsbury
O Morrison
O ASDA
O Other
Please put tick mark for each statement in appropriate box where 1- Strongly agree (1),
2- Agree, 3- Neither agree nor Disagree, 4- Disagree, 5- Strongly disagree (5)
O Strongly agree
O Agree
O Neither agrees nor disagrees
O Disagree
O Strongly disagree
O Strongly agree
O Agree
O Neither agrees nor disagrees
O Disagree
O Strongly disagree
O Strongly agree
O Agree
O Neither agrees nor disagrees
O Disagree
O Strongly disagree
O Strongly agree
O Agree
O Neither agrees nor disagrees
O Disagree
O Strongly disagree
Analyzing the impact of consumer purchasing decision on fair trade and organic
products
O Strongly agree
O Agree
O Neither agrees nor disagrees
O Disagree
O Strongly disagree
O Strongly agree
O Agree
O Neither agrees nor disagrees
O Disagree
O Strongly disagree
Understanding of the brand positioning and its influence on the customers
purchasing decision for fair trade and organic products in UK supermarket
11. In a product category, if fairtrade product is available you will choose fairetrade
product
O Strongly agree
O Agree
O Neither agrees nor disagrees
O Disagree
O Strongly disagree
12. You will pay fair price for fairtrade products from supermarkets.
O Yes
O No
O No comments
O Strongly agree
O Agree
O Neither agrees nor disagrees
O Disagree
O Strongly disagree
Find out the effectiveness between the fair trade and organic products in UK
supermarkets for consumers
O Strongly agree
O Agree
O Strongly agree
O Agree
O Neither agrees nor disagrees
O Disagree
O Strongly disagree
This is a survey to explore and analyze the future of green marketing in the UK
supermarkets. I would expect your honest and impartial participation to achieve an
exclusive unbiased outcome. All the information will be used for academic purpose and
kept under strict confidence.
Please go through the following text to know what the questionnaire is about and
answer the following questions:
1. What is your gender?
O Male (26)
O Female (31)
O Yes (45)
O No (7)
O No comments (5)
O Tesco (9)
O Marks and Spencer (15
O Sainsbury (11)
O Morrison (13)
O ASDA (6)
O Other (3)
Please put tick mark for each statement in appropriate box where 1- Strongly agree (1),
2- Agree, 3- Neither agree nor Disagree, 4- Disagree, 5- Strongly disagree (5)
B
a
r
C
h
t
3cments
1152 YN
eosQ
O Strongly disagree (5)
C
ount
96
3020-331-404A
1g
-5e
051-6060+
Age * Q4
B
a
r
C
h
t
4unnyd
765 ATSM
eM
sSpaoiD
crrksobQ
C
ount
O
t
h
e
r
s
423
1020-331-404A
1g
-5e
051-6060+
Age * Q5
B
a
r
C
h
t
180 ASSN
tD
rtsooiaehnnggrQ
lelyyA5
aD
riseagore
C
ount
64
2020-331-404A
1g
-5e
051-6060+
Age * Q6
B
a
r
C
h
t
180 ASSN
tD
rtsooiaehnnggrQ
lelyyA6
aD
riseagore
C
ount
64
2020-331-404A
1g
-5e
051-6060+
Age * Q7
B
a
r
C
h
t
765 ASSN
tD
rtsooiaehnnggrQ
lelyyA7
aD
riseagore
C
ount
423
1020-331-404A
1g
-5e
051-6060+
Age * Q8
B
a
r
C
h
t
180 ASSN
tD
rtsooiaehnnggrQ
lelyyA8
aD
riseagore
C
ount
64
2020-331-404A
1g
-5e
051-6060+
Age * Q9
B
a
r
C
h
t
65 ASSN
tD
rtsooiaehnnggrQ
lelyyA9
aD
riseagore
C
ount
43
21
020-331-404A
1g
-5e
051-6060+
Age * Q10
B
a
r
C
h
t
0isreagore
765 ASSN
tD
rtsooiaehnnggQ
lrelyy1
aAD
C
ount
423
1020-331-404A
1g
-5e
051-6060+
B
a
r
C
h
t
86 ASSN
tD
rtsooiaehnnggQ
lrelyy1
aAD
riseagore
C
ount
42
020-331-404A
1g
-5e
051-6060+
Age * Q12
B
a
r
C
h
t
2ments
111420 YN
eoQ
sc1
C
ount
846
2020-331-404A
1g
-5e
051-6060+
Age * Q13
B
a
r
C
h
t
3isreagore
86 ASSN
tD
rtsooiaehnnggQ
lrelyy1
aAD
C
ount
42
020-331-404A
1g
-5e
051-6060+
Age * Q14
B
a
r
C
h
t
4isreagore
180 ASSN
tD
rtsooiaehnnggQ
lrelyy1
aAD
C
ount
64
2020-331-404A
1g
-5e
051-6060+
Age * Q15
B
a
r
C
h
t
5isreagore
765 ASSN
tD
rtsooiaehnnggQ
lrelyy1
aAD
C
ount
423
1020-331-404A
1g
-5e
051-6060+
Valid
Male
Female
Total
Frequency
26
31
Percent
45.6
54.4
Valid Percent
45.6
54.4
57
100.0
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
45.6
100.0
Age
Valid
20-30
31-40
Frequency
20
16
Percent
35.1
28.1
Valid Percent
35.1
28.1
Cumulative
Percent
35.1
63.2
41-50
15.8
15.8
78.9
51-60
12.3
12.3
91.2
60+
8.8
8.8
100.0
Total
57
100.0
100.0
Q3
Valid
Yes
No
No
comments
Total
Frequency
45
7
Percent
78.9
12.3
Valid Percent
78.9
12.3
Cumulative
Percent
78.9
91.2
8.8
8.8
100.0
57
100.0
100.0
Q4
Valid
Tesco
Marks and
Spencer
Sainsbury
Morisson
Frequency
9
Percent
15.8
Valid Percent
15.8
Cumulative
Percent
15.8
15
26.3
26.3
42.1
11
19.3
19.3
61.4
13
22.8
22.8
84.2
10.5
10.5
94.7
100.0
ASDA
Others
Total
5.3
5.3
57
100.0
100.0
Q5
Frequency
Valid
Strongly
agree
Agree
Neither
Agree or
Disagree
Disagree
Strongly
Disagree
Total
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
14
24.6
24.6
24.6
19
33.3
33.3
57.9
10
17.5
17.5
75.4
15.8
15.8
91.2
8.8
8.8
100.0
57
100.0
100.0
Q6
Frequency
Valid
Strongly
agree
Agree
Neither
Agree or
Disagree
Disagree
Strongly
Disagree
Total
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
17
29.8
29.8
29.8
16
28.1
28.1
57.9
10
17.5
17.5
75.4
12.3
12.3
87.7
12.3
12.3
100.0
57
100.0
100.0
Q7
Frequency
Valid
Strongly
agree
Agree
Neither
Agree or
Disagree
Disagree
Strongly
Disagree
Total
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
13
22.8
22.8
22.8
20
35.1
35.1
57.9
12
21.1
21.1
78.9
12.3
12.3
91.2
8.8
8.8
100.0
57
100.0
100.0
Q8
Frequency
Valid
Strongly
agree
Agree
Neither
Agree or
Disagree
Disagree
Strongly
Disagree
Total
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
14
24.6
24.6
24.6
19
33.3
33.3
57.9
10
17.5
17.5
75.4
15.8
15.8
91.2
8.8
8.8
100.0
57
100.0
100.0
Q9
Frequency
Valid
Strongly
agree
Agree
Neither
Agree or
Disagree
Disagree
Strongly
Disagree
Total
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
15
26.3
26.3
26.3
18
31.6
31.6
57.9
15.8
15.8
73.7
10
17.5
17.5
91.2
8.8
8.8
100.0
57
100.0
100.0
Q10
Frequency
Valid
Strongly
agree
Agree
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
8.8
8.8
8.8
14.0
14.0
22.8
Neither
Agree or
Disagree
Disagree
Strongly
Disagree
Total
15
26.3
26.3
49.1
19
33.3
33.3
82.5
10
17.5
17.5
100.0
57
100.0
100.0
Q11
Frequency
Valid
Strongly
agree
Agree
Neither
Agree or
Disagree
Disagree
Strongly
Disagree
Total
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
15
26.3
26.3
26.3
18
31.6
31.6
57.9
10
17.5
17.5
75.4
12.3
12.3
87.7
12.3
12.3
100.0
57
100.0
100.0
Q12
Valid
Yes
No
No
comments
Total
Frequency
36
13
Percent
63.2
22.8
Valid Percent
63.2
22.8
Cumulative
Percent
63.2
86.0
14.0
14.0
100.0
57
100.0
100.0
Q13
Frequency
Valid
Strongly
agree
Agree
Neither
Agree or
Disagree
Disagree
Strongly
Disagree
Total
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
11
19.3
19.3
19.3
21
36.8
36.8
56.1
14.0
14.0
70.2
10
17.5
17.5
87.7
12.3
12.3
100.0
57
100.0
100.0
Q14
Frequency
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid
Strongly
agree
Agree
Neither
Agree or
Disagree
Disagree
Strongly
Disagree
Total
16
28.1
28.1
28.1
17
29.8
29.8
57.9
13
22.8
22.8
80.7
15.8
15.8
96.5
3.5
3.5
100.0
57
100.0
100.0
Q15
Frequency
Valid
Strongly
agree
Agree
Neither
Agree or
Disagree
Disagree
Strongly
Disagree
Total
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
13
22.8
22.8
22.8
20
35.1
35.1
57.9
15.8
15.8
73.7
10
17.5
17.5
91.2
8.8
8.8
100.0
57
100.0
100.0
G
e
n
d
r
5400
Frequncy
Frequncy
3200
100.511G
M
e
a
n
=
1
.
5
4
S
t
d
.
D
v
0
3
N
7
.n
5d
22
.
5
e
r
A
g
e
2105
150
M
e
a
n
=
2
.
3
S
t
d
.
D
v
1
N
5
7
012A
3g
e456
Q
3
5400
Frequncy
Frequncy
3200
100.511.52Q
M
e
a
n
=
1
.
3
S
t
d
.
D
v
0
6
2
N
5
7
24
.533.5
3Q
1150
50 SM
e
a
n
=
3
.
0
2
t
d
.
D
v
1
4
3
N
5
7
123Q
44567
Q
5
2105
Frequncy
Frequncy
150
M
e
a
n
=
2
.
5
1
S
t
d
.
D
v
6
9
N
7
0123Q
4Q
5
6
5
6
2105
150
M
e
a
n
=
2
.
4
9
S
t
d
.
D
v
1
3
6
4
N
5
7
0123Q
6456
Q
7
2105
Frequncy
Frequncy
150
M
e
a
n
=
2
.
4
9
S
t
d
.
D
v
1
2
7
N
5
7
0123Q
4Q
5
6
7
8
2105
150
M
e
a
n
=
2
.
5
1
S
t
d
.
D
v
6
9
N
7
0123Q
8456
Q
9
2105
Frequncy
Frequncy
150
M
e
a
n
=
2
.
5
1
S
t
d
.
D
v
9
7
N
7
0123Q
4Q
5
6
9
1
0
2105
150
M
e
a
n
=
3
.
7
S
t
d
.
D
v
1
9
N
5
012Q
31
0456
Q
1
2105
Frequncy
Frequncy
150
M
e
a
n
=
2
.
5
3
S
t
d
.
D
v
1
8
N
7
012Q
31Q
41
5
6
2
4300
2100
M
e
a
n
=
1
.
5
S
t
d
.
D
v
0
7
3
5
N
7
0.511.5Q
21
22.533.5
Q
1
3
2250
Frequncy
Frequncy
1150
5012Q
M
e
a
n
=
2
.
6
7
S
t
d
.
D
v
1
3
4
N
5
31
4Q
5
6
3
1
4
2105
150
M
e
a
n
=
2
.
3
7
S
t
d
.
D
v
1
5
9
N
5
012Q
31
4456
Q
1
5
2105
Frequncy
150
M
e
a
n
=
2
.
5
4
S
t
d
.
D
v
1
6
9
N
7
012Q
31
5456
Graph
Notes
Output Created
Comments
Input
16-APR-2013 16:53:53
Data
Filter
<none>
Weight
<none>
Split File
<none>
N of Rows in
Working Data File
Syntax
Resources
E:\Downloads\mv\rango\SPSS\thesefi
rst\3_Fahad\spss\Fahad_super_mark
et.sav
Elapsed Time
57
GRAPH /PIE=COUNT BY Gender .
0:00:00.03
G
eMFnamdler
Graph
Notes
Output Created
Comments
Input
16-APR-2013 16:54:15
Data
Filter
<none>
Weight
<none>
Split File
<none>
N of Rows in
Working Data File
Syntax
Resources
E:\Downloads\mv\rango\SPSS\thesefi
rst\3_Fahad\spss\Fahad_super_mark
et.sav
Elapsed Time
57
GRAPH /PIE=COUNT BY Age .
0:00:00.00
A2g01e-+-35460
Graph
Notes
Output Created
Comments
Input
16-APR-2013 16:54:34
Data
Filter
<none>
Weight
<none>
Split File
<none>
N of Rows in
Working Data File
Syntax
Resources
E:\Downloads\mv\rango\SPSS\thesefi
rst\3_Fahad\spss\Fahad_super_mark
et.sav
Elapsed Time
57
GRAPH /PIE=COUNT BY Q3 .
0:00:00.00
3cments
YN
eosQ
Graph
Notes
Output Created
Comments
Input
16-APR-2013 16:54:57
Data
Filter
<none>
Weight
<none>
Split File
<none>
N of Rows in
Working Data File
Syntax
Resources
E:\Downloads\mv\rango\SPSS\thesefi
rst\3_Fahad\spss\Fahad_super_mark
et.sav
Elapsed Time
57
GRAPH /PIE=COUNT BY Q4 .
0:00:00.02