Part 1 CH 1

EULER'S
INSTITUTIONUM CALCULI INTEGRALIS VOL. 1

Part I, Section I,Chapter I.
Translated and annotated by Ian Bruce.
page 22
INTEGRAL CALCULUS
BOOK ONE
PART ONE
OR
A METHOD FOR FINDING FUNCTIONS OF ONE VARIABLE

FROM SOME GIVEN RELATION OF THE DIFFERENTIALS
OF THE FIRST ORDER
FIRST SECTION
CONCERNING THE
INTEGRATION OF DIFFERENTIAL
FORMULAS.
EULER'S
page 23
CHAPTER I
CONCERNING THE INTEGRATION OF RATIONAL

DIFFERENTIAL FORMULAS
DEFINITION
40. The formula of a differential is rational, when the differential dx of the variable x of
which the function is sought is multiplied by a rational function of x; or if X designates a
rational function of x, this formula Xdx of the differential is said to be rational.
COROLLARY 1
41. Hence in this chapter a function of x is sought of this kind, which if it should be put
as y, in order that
to X, so that
dy
dx
dy
dx
is equal to a rational function of x, or with such a function put equal
= X.
COROLLARY 2
42. Hence a function of x of this kind is sought, of which the differential is equal to Xdx;
hence the integral of this, which now is accustomed to be indicated by Xdx , provides
the function sought.

COROLLARY 3
43. But if P should be a function of x of this kind, so that the differential of this is dP =
Xdx, since the quantity P + C likewise is differential, the complete integral of the
proposed formula Xdx is P + C [, for some arbitrary constant C.]
SCHOLION 1
44. Questions of this kind are referred to in the first part of the first book, in which
functions of the single variable x are sought from a given relation of the differentials of
the first degree. It is evident that if the function sought is equal to y and
dy
dx
= p, it is
required to prevail, in order that for some proposed equation between the three quantities
x, y and p, from this the natural form of the function y is found, or an equation between x
and y, with the letter p elicited. But the question thus proposed in general is considered to
outdo the analytical powers so far, so that at no time can a solution be expected.
EULER'S
page 24
Therefore our strengths are to be exercised in the simpler cases, among which the case
occurs, in which p is equal to some function of x, for example X, so that
dy
dx
= X or
dy = Xdx and thus the integral y = Xdx is required, as we arrange in the first section.
Now this case extends widely to various natural forms of the function X and also it is
involved in many more difficult cases, from which we put in place only questions to be
resolved in this chapter, in which that function X is rational, and then to be progressing
to these irrational functions. Hence this part is subdivided conveniently into two parts, in
the first of which the integration of the simple formulas, in which p =
dy
dx
is equal to a
function of x only, is to be treated, but in the other it is appropriate to give an account of

the integration, when the equation proposed is some function of x, y and p. And since in
these two sections and chiefly in the first, most is an elaboration of the geometers, that
occupy the greater part of the whole work.
SCHOLION 2
45. But first the principles of integration are to be desired from the differential calculus,
and in the same way as the principles of division from multiplication, and the principles
of the extraction of roots from an account of raising to powers, are accustomed to be
taken. Since therefore, if a magnitude to be differentiated depends on several parts, such
as P + Q R, the differential of this is dP + dQ dR, thus in turn, if the formula of the
differential depends on several parts as Pdx +Qdx Rdx, the integral is
Pdx + Qdx Rdx

obviously from the integrals of the individual parts separately. Then, since the differential
of the magnitude aP is adP, the integral of the differential formula aPdx is a Pdx ,
clearly as the differential formula is multiplied by that constant magnitude, the integral
must be multiplied by the same. Thus if the formula of the differentials is aPdx + bQdx +
cRdx, whatever functions of x are designated by P, Q, R, the integral is
a Pdx + b Qdx + c Rdx ,

thus in order that the integration is to be put in place of the forms Pdx, Qdx and Rdx,
and thus the above must be increased by the addition of an arbitrary constant C, in order
that the complete integral is obtained.
PROBLEM 1
46. To find the function of x, in order that the differential of this is equal to ax n dx , or to
integrate the differential formula ax n dx .
EULER'S
page 25
SOLUTION
Since the differential of the power x is mx m 1dx , there is in turn
m
mx
m 1
dx = m x m 1dx = x m
and thus
m 1
dx = 1 x m ;
m
on making m 1 = n or m = n +1; there becomes
x dx = n1+1 x
n
n +1
and a x n dx = na+1 x n +1 .
From which the completed integral of the proposed differential formula is

a x n +1 + C ,
n +1
the reason or from which thus is apparent, because the differential actually is equal to
ax n dx . And this integration always has a place, whatever number is attributed to the
exponent n, either positive or negative, either an integer or a fraction, or even irrational.
Hence a single case is excepted, in which the exponent n = 1 or it is proposed to
integrate this formula adx . Now in the differential calculus I have shown, if lx denotes
x
the hyperbolic logarithm of x, the differential of this is equal to dx , from which in turn
x
we can conclude that
dxx = lx
and
adxx = alx .
Whereby with an arbitrary constant added the complete integral of the formula adx is
x
equal to
alx + C= lxa+ C,
that also on putting lc for C can thus be expressed: lcxa.
COROLLARY 1
47. Hence the integral of the differential formulas ax n dx is always algebraic with the
only excepted case, in which n = 1 and the integral is expressed by logarithms, which
are to be referred to as transcendent functions. Obviously, it is given by
adxx = alx + C = lcx
EULER'S
page 26
COROLLARY 2
48. If the exponent n denotes a positive number, then the following integrations are to be
expressed properly, in as much as they are especially easy:
adx = ax + C, axdx = a2 xx + C , ax dx = a3 x + C,
3
4
4
5
5
6
ax dx = a4 x + C, ax dx = a5 x + C, ax dx = a6 x + C.
2
COROLLARY 3
49. If n is a negative number, on putting n = m there becomes
adx
x
m
= a x1 m + C =
1 m
a
( m l ) x m 1
+C ,
from which these simpler cases can be noted :
= a + C, adx = a + C, adx = a + C,
adx
x
2 xx
x
x
x
3x
= a + C, adx = a + C, etc.
adx
x
x
4x
5x
2
COROLLARY 4
50. But also if n denotes a fractional number, hence the integrals can be obtained.
First let n = m ; then
3
adx
x m = 2a x x m + C,
m+2
from which the cases are to be noted :
adx x = 23a x x + C, axdx x = 25a x x + C,

3
3
4
axxdx x = 27a x x + C, ax dx x = 29a x x + C.
2
COROLLARY 5
51. Also there can be put n = m and there is had

2
adx =
2a
2a
+C =
+C,
m
m
x
2m x
( m 2) xm2
from which these cases are to be noted :
EULER'S

adx = 2a x + C,
adx = 2 a + C,
adx = 2 a + C,
x
x x
x
xx x 3 x x
page 27
xadxx = 5 x2ax + C.
3
COROLLARIUM 6
52. If in general we put n =
, then there arises
ax dx = a x
+
+C
or through roots,
x = a x + + C ;
adx
but if there is put n =
then there is had
= a x
adx
+C
or through roots,
adxx = a
+C .
SCHOLIUM1
53. Nevertheless I have decided in this chapter to treat only rational functions, yet these
irrationals can still be presented at once, as likewise they can be treated as rationals.
Hence the remaining more complicated formulas are able to be integrated also, if
functions of a certain variable z are taken for x. Just as if we put x = f +gz, then dx = gdz;
whereby if for a we write ag , there is had
adz ( f + gz )
a
( n +1) g (
f + gz )
n +1
+C ,
but in the particular case, in which n = 1,
= a l ( f + gz ) + C .
( fadz
+ gz ) g
Then if there shall be n = m, the integral becomes
( f adz
+ gz )
But on putting n = there is produced
( m 1) g ( f + gz )
m 1
+C.
EULER'S
+1
adz ( f + gz ) = a ( f + gz ) + C ;
( + ) g
page 28
but on putting n = there is obtained
( f +adzgz )
a( f + gz )
( ) g ( f + gz )
+C .
SCHOLIUM 2
54. Here another significant property deserves to be noted. Since here a function y is
dy
sought, in order that dy = ax n dx , if we put dx = p , this relation is obtained p = ax n , from

which the function y must be investigated. Therefore since
y = na+1 x n +1 + C ,
on account of ax n = p there is also
px
y = n +1 + C
and thus we have the case, where the relation of the differentials through a certain
equation is proposed between x, y and p and now we know for each to be satisfied by the
equation y = na+1 x n +1 + C . Now this no further is the complete integral for the relation
px
held in the equation y = n +1 + C , but only a particular one, because the new integral does
not involve a constant, which is not in the relation of the differentials. Moreover the
complete integral is
y = naD
x n +1 + C
+1
involving a new constant D; hence there becomes

dy
= aDx n = p
dx
and thus
px
y = n +1 + C.
If this is not relevant to the present situation, yet it is helpful to be noted.
PROBLEM 2
55. To find a function of x, of which the differential is equal to Xdx, with X denoting some
rational integer function of x, or to definite the integral Xdx .
SOLUTION
Since X is a function of x of the rational integers [e. g. a polynomial], by necessity it
contained in this form :
X = + x + x 2 + x3 + x 4 + etc.,
EULER'S
page 29
from which by the previous problem the integral sought is
Xdx = C + x + 12 x
+ 13 x3 + 14 x 4 + 15 x5 + 15 x6 + etc.,
And in general if there should be
X = x + x + x + etc.,
then there becomes
Xdx = C + +1 x
+1
+ +1 x +1 + +1 x +1 + etc.,
where the exponents , , etc. are able to signify both positive and negative numbers
as well as fractions, provided it is noted, if there should be = 1 , then there becomes
xdx = lx , which is the single case to be referred to the order of transcendent functions.
PROBLEM 3
56. If X denotes some rational fractional function of x, to describe the method, with the
help of which it is convenient to investigate the integral of the formula Xdx.
Therefore let
X=M
N
SOLUTION
, thus in order that M and N are to become integral functions of x,
and in the first place it is to be considered, whether the sum of the powers of x in the
numerator M is either greater or less than in the denominator N, in which case from the
, integral [i. e. whole] parts can be elicited by division; the integration of
fraction M
N
which can be obtained without difficulty, and the whole calculation is reduced to a
, in which the sum of the powers of x in the numerator M is less
fraction of this kind M
N
than in the denominator N.
Then all the factors of the denominator N itself are sought, both simple if they are real,
as well as real squares, clearly in turn of the simple squares of [complex conjugate]
imaginary factors arising ; likewise it is to be considered whether these factors are all
unequal or not ; for indeed with the equality of the factors another method for the
into simple fractions has to be put in place, since they arise
resolution of the fraction M
N
from the factors of individual fractions, of which the sum of the fractions proposed is
. Certainly from the simple factor a + bx the fraction arises :
equal to M
N
A
a + bx
if two are equal or the denominator N should have the factor (a + bx)2 , hence there arises
the fractions :
A
B ;
2 +
a +bx
(a + bx )
EULER'S
page 30

3
moreover from the factor (a + bx) of this kind these three fractions arise:
A
(a + bx )3
B
(a +bx ) 2
+ a +Cbx :
and thus henceforth.

But a double factor, the form of which is aa 2abxcos. + bbxx , unless the two should be
equal, gives a fraction of the form
A+ Bx
;
aa 2 abxcos . + bbxx
but if the N involves two equal factors of this kind, from this the two partial fractions of
this kind arise :
A+ Bx
C + Dx
2 +
aa 2abxcos . +bbxx
( aa 2abxcos. +bbxx )
but if the cube, thus ( aa 2abxcos. + bbxx ) should be a factor of the denominator N,
3
from that there arises the three partial fractions :

A+ Bx
3
2
cos. +bbxx )
aa
abx
C + Dx
2
2
cos . +bbxx )
aa
abx
E + Fx
+ aa 2abx
;
cos. +bbxx

can be resolved into all its simple
Therefore since in this way the proposed fraction M
N
fractions, all are contained in one or other of these forms : either
A
( a +bx )
or
A+ Bx
and now it is required to integrate the individual terms multiplied by dx; the value of the
.
function sought is the sum of all these integrals Xdx = Mdx
N
COROLLARY 1
57. Hence for an integration of all the forms of this kind Mdx
the whole calculation is
N
reduced to the integration of the two forms of this kind :
( aAdx
+ bx )
and
( A+ Bx )dx
while for n there are written successively the numbers 1, 2, 3, 4, etc.
EULER'S
page 31
COROLLARIUM 2
58. And indeed the integral of the first form above ( 53) is now obtained, from which it
is apparent to be :
Adx = A l a + bx + Const .
)
a + bx b (
( aAdx
+ bx )
( aAdx
+ bx )
A
b( a + bx )
A
2
2b( a + bx )
+ Const .
+ Const .
et generally
( aAdx
+bx )
A
n 1
1
n
b
( ) ( a +bx )
+ Const .
COROLLARY 3
59. Hence in order that the proposition can be completed, nothing else is required, except
that the integration of this form
( A+ Bx )dx
must be shown, indeed for the case n = 1, then for the cases n = 2, n = 3, n = 4, etc.
SCHOLIUM 1
60. Unless we want to avoid imaginary quantities, the whole calculation now can be
completed from what has been treated; for with the denominator N resolved into all its
simple factors, they are either real or imaginary, the proposed fraction always can be
resolved into partial fractions of this form aAdx
or of this Adx n ; since the integrals of
+ bx
( a +bx )
dx can be obtained. But then as

which can be shown, the integral of the whole form M
N
here there might be some inconvenience the pairs of imaginary parts [i. e. complex
conjugates] thus are joined together, in order that a real expression results, which
nevertheless completes the nature of the integration absolutely.
SCHOLION 2
61. Certainly here it is to be conceded that we postulate the resolution of an integral
function into factors, even if the algebra so far has by no means led to that [conclusion],
in order that this resolution actually can be put in place. But this is accustomed to be
postulated in analysis everywhere, in order that, as the longer we progress, those things
which are left behind, even if they have not been explored well enough, we assume as
known ; evidently it suffices here that all the factors are able to be assigned by the
method of approximation, however close they can be assigned. In a like manner in the
EULER'S
page 32
integral calculus the longer we proceed, the integrals of all the formulas of the form Xdx,
whatever function of x may be signified by the letter X, we will consider as known and
by us to be the most outstanding, if we can prevail to reduce more obscure integrals to
these forms ; this also disturbs nothing in practical use, since the values of such formulas
Xdx are allowed to be assigned almost to any extend you wish, as we shall show in
what follows. Otherwise about these integrals, the resolution of the denominator N into
its factors is absolutely necessary, therefore in order that the individual factors are present
in the expression of the integral ; there are just a few cases and these are especially easy,
in which we are able to do without that resolution ; just as if this formula is proposed
x n 1dx
1+ x n
it is at once apparent on putting x n = that it goes into
d
, the integral of
n(1+ )
which is 1n l (1 + ) = 1n l 1 + x n , where there was no need for the resolution of the factors.
Now cases of this kind are so evident in themselves, so that no particular explanation of
these may be needed.
PROBLEM 4
62. To find the integral of this formula
( A+ Bx )dx
y = aa 2abxcos. +bbxx
SOLUTION
Since the numerator depends on the two parts Adx+Bxdx, this latter term Bxdx can be
removed in the following manner. Since there arises
l ( aa 2abxcos. + bbxx ) =
2 abdxcos . + 2bbxdx
aa 2abxcos. +bbxx
this equation is to be multiplied by 2Bbb and taken away from the proposed equation ; for
thus there is produced
y B l ( aa 2abxcos. + bbxx ) =
2bb
( A+
Bacos .
b
)dx
aa 2abxcos. +bbxx
thus in order that only the formula to be integrated remains. For brevity the formula is put
in place
Bacos .
A+ b
=C
so that this becomes
aa 2abxCdx
cos . + bbxx
EULER'S
page 33
which thus can be expressed thus
aa sin . +Cdx
( bx acos. )
2
There is put in place bx acos. = av sin. and hence dx = adv bsin. from which our
formula becomes
Cadv sin . :b
C
dv
aa sin . (1+vv ) = ab sin
. (1+ vv ) .
2
But from the differential calculus we know that this becomes
(1+dvvv ) = Arc.tang.v = Arc.tang.
bx a cos .
a sin .
from which on account of

C=
our integral is now
Ab + Ba cos .
b
Ab + Ba cos .
bx a cos .
Arc.tang. a sin .
abb sin .
On account of which the integral of the proposed formula
( A+ Bx )dx
aa2abxcos. +bbxx
is equal to
B l aa 2abxcos.
2bb (
Ab + Ba cos .
+ bbxx ) + abb sin .
bx a cos .
Arc.tang. a sin .
which so that is complete, an arbitrary constant C is added above.

bx a cos .
63. If to Arc.tang. a sin .
COROLLARY 1
cos .
we add Arc.tang. sin . , which obviously is considered

bx sin .
agreeable to be the constant to be added, there is produced Arc.tang. a bx cos . and thus
we have
EULER'S
page 34

( A+ Bx )dx
aa 2 abxcos . +bbxx
Ab + Ba cos .
bx sin .
= 2Bbb l ( aa 2abxcos. + bbxx ) + abb sin . Arc.tang. a bx cos .
with the constant C added.

COROLLARY 2
64. If we wish, so that the integral thus vanishes on putting x = 0, the constant C may be
B laa and thus there arises
taken as equal to 2bb
( A+ Bx )dx
aa2abxcos. +bbxx
Bl
= bb
a
Ab + Ba cos .
+ abb sin .
bx sin .
Arc.tang. a bx cos .
Hence this integral depends on logarithms in part, and in part on the arc of circles or
angles.
COROLLARY 3
65. If the letter B vanishes, the part depending on logarithms vanishes and there is
produced
bx sin .
= A Arc.tang. a bx cos . + C
aa2abxAdx
cos . + bbxx ab sin .
and thus is defined by an angle alone.
COROLLARY 4
66. If the angle is right and thus cos . = 0 and sin . = 1 , there is obtained
( A+ Bx )dx
aa +bbxx
Bl
= bb
( aa +bbxx )
a
A Arc.tang. bx + C ;
+ ab
a
if the angle is 60 and thus cos. = 12 and sin . = 23 , then there arises
( A+ Bx )dx
aaabx+bbxx = bbB l
( aa abx +bbxx )
a
3
+ 2 Ab + Ba Arc.tang. 2bx
a bx
But if = 120o and thus cos. = 12 and sin . =
abb 3
3
, then there arises
2
EULER'S
( A+ Bx )dx
= Bl
aa + abx +bbxx bb
( aa + abx +bbxx )
a
page 35
3
+ 2 Ab Ba Arc.tang. 2bx
a + bx
abb 3
SCHOLIUM 1
67. Here it comes about entirely worthy to be noted, that in the case = 0 , in which the
denominator aa 2abx + bbxx becomes a square, the account of the angle disappears
from the integral. Indeed on putting the angle to be infinitely small then there becomes
B l a bx and the other part
cos. = 1 and sin . = , from which the logarithmic becomes bb
a
Ab + Ba Arc.tang. bx = ( Ab + Ba ) x
abb
a bx
ab( a bx )
, because the arc of the infinitely small tangent itself is
bx
equal to a bx , and thus this part becomes algebraic. On account of which there becomes
( A+ Bx )dx B a bx ( Ab + Ba ) x
( abx )2 = bb l a + ab( a bx ) + Const.,
the truth of which is obvious from the preceding; for there is
( A+ Bx )
B + Ab + Ba
2 =
2
( a bx ) b( a bx ) b( a bx )
Now there becomes
B la = B l a bx ,
= B l ( a bx ) bb
b(aBdx
bb
a
bx ) bb
( Ab + Ba )dx Ab + Ba Ab + Ba ( Ab + Ba ) x
=
abb =
,
2
bb( a bx )
ab( a bx )
b( a bx )
if indeed each integration is thus determined, as in the case x = 0 the integrals vanish.
SCHOLION 2
68. In a similar manner, which we have used here, if in the formula with the differential
the sum of the powers of x in the numerator M shall be one degree less than
fraction Mdx
N
in the denominator N, also that boundary can be lifted. For let the equations be
M = Ax n 1 + Bx n 2 + Cx n 3 + etc.
and
N = x n + x n 1 + x n 2 + etc.
and there is put Mdx

= dy . Now since there shall be
N
dN = n x n 1dx + ( n 1) dx x n 2 + ( n 2 ) dx x n 3 + etc.
then there will be
EULER'S
AdN
n N

dx Ax n 1 + ( n 1) A x n 2 + ( n 2 ) A x n 3 + etc. ,
N
n
n
page 36
with which value then subtracted there remains
( n 1) A
( n 2 ) A
= dx
dy nAdN
B n x n 2 + C n x n 3 + etc.
N
N
Whereby if for the sake of brevity there is put

B
( n 1) A
there is obtained
= B, C
( n 2 ) A
= C, D
( n 3) A
n
= D, etc.,
dx( Bx n2 +Cx n3 + Dx n 4 + etc.)

y = nA lN +
= Mdx
.
n
n 1
n2
n 3
N
x + x
+ x
+ x
etc.
Therefore in this manner all the differential formulas of the fractions can be reduced by
that, so that the sum of the powers of x in the numerator shall be less by two or more
degrees than in the denominator.
PROBLEM 5
69. The integral formula

y=
( A+ Bx )dx
n +1
is to be reduced to another like formula, where the power of the denominator is less by
one degree.
SOLUTION
For the sake of brevity let the formula be aa 2abxcos. + bbxx = X and there is put
Since on account of
( A+ Bx )dx
X n +1
= y.
dX = 2abdxcos. + 2bbdxx
let
d . C + Dx
=
n
X
n( C + Dx ) dX
X
n +1
1
+ Ddx
n
X
and thus [for some constants C and D ],

C + Dx =
Xn
2nb( C + Dx )( a cos . bx ) dx
+
X n +1
,
Ddx
X
n
EULER'S
page 37
we have
y + C + Dx
=
n
X
dx( A+ 2 nCab cos . + x( B + 2nDab cos . 2nCbb ) 2 nDbbxx )

X n+1
+ Ddx
n .
Now in the first formula the letters C and D thus are to be defined, in order that the
numerator becomes divisible by X ; hence [see * below] it is necessary for the numerator
to be equal to 2nDXdx ,
[i.e. the numerator becomes 2nDdx ( aa 2abx cos . + bbxx ) = 2nDXdx ]
from which we arrive at
A + 2nCab cos . = 2nDaa
and
B + 2nDab cos . 2nCbb = 4nDab cos .
or B 2nCbb = 2nDabcos. and hence

2nCbb ;
2nDa = Bbcos
.
but from the former condition there is
2nDa =
A 2nCab cos .
a
from which equated there arises

Ba + Abcos. 2nCabbsin 2 . = 0
or
C=
Ba + Abcos .
2 nabbsin 2 .
from which
B 2nCbb =
Ba sin .2 Ba Ab cos .
a sin .2
thus so that there is found

D=
Ab Ba cos .
.
2naab sin .2
Hence with the letters taken :

C=
Ba + Ab cos .
2nabb sin 2 .
Ab cos . Ba cos .2
a sin .2
and D =
Ab Ba cos .
2 naab sin 2 .
then there becomes [*]

dx
y + C + Dx
= 2nDdx
+ Ddx
n
n
n = ( 2 n 1) D
n
X
and thus
or
( A+ Bx )dx
X n +1
= C nDx ( 2n 1) D dxn ,
X
EULER'S
page 38

( A+ Bx )dx Baa Aab cos . +( Abb + Bab cos . ) x
=
2 naabb sin .2 X n
X n +1
( 2n 1)( Ab + Ba cos . )
2 naab sin .2
Xdx .
n
Whereby, if the formula dxn should be agreed upon, then it is also possible to assign the
integral
( A+ Bx )dx
X n+1
COROLLARY 1
70. Therefore since on keeping X = aa 2abx cos . + bbxx there shall be
dxX
bx sin .
1
= absin
Arc.tang . a bx cos . + Const .,
.
then there becomes
( A+ Bx )dx
X
Baa Aab cos . +( Abb + Bab cos . ) x Ab + Ba cos .

+
2aabb sin .2 X
2 na 3bb sin .3
bx sin .
Arc.tang. a bx cos . + Const .
And thus on putting B = 0 and A = 1 there becomes

a cos . +bx
bx sin .
Xdx = 2aab sin . X + 2a b 1sin . Arc.tang. a bx cos . + Const .

2
Hence the integral
( A+ Bx )dx
X2
does not involve logarithms.
COROLLARY 2
71. Hence therefore since there becomes
a cos . +bx
Xdx = 4aab sin . X

3
3
4 aa sin .2
Xdx + Const .,
2
on substituting that value, it becomes
dx
X3
a cos . +bx
4 aab sin .2 X 2
and hence in turn it is concluded
3( a cos . +bx )
24 a 4b sin .4 X
13
24 a 5b sin .5
bx sin .
Arc.tang . a bx cos .
EULER'S
Xdx =
4

5( a cos . +bx )
3( a cos . +bx )
a cos . + bx
+
+
6aab sin .2 X 3 46 a 4b sin .4 X 2 246 a 6b sin .6 X
135
246 a 7b sin .7
page 39
bx sin .
COROLLARIUM 3
72. Thus by progressing further the integrals of all the formulas of this kind are obtained :
dxX , Xdx , Xdx , Xdx

2
etc.,
the first of which is expressed by the arc of a circle only, while the remaining contain
algebraic parts as well.
SCHOLIUM
73. Moreover it is sufficient to know the integral dxn+1 , because the formula
( A+ Bx )dx
X n +1
is easily reduced to that ; for thus it is possible to represent this by

1
2bb
2Abbdx + 2 Bbbxdx 2 Babdxcos . + 2 Babdxcos .

X n+1
which on account of 2bbxdx 2abdxcos. = dX , goes into this form

1
2bb
+ 21b
BdX
X
( Ab + Ba )cos. dx
n +1
X n +1
But
XdX
n +1
= 1n ,
nX
from which there is obtained
( A+ Bx )dx
X n +1
B + Ab + Bacos .
b
2nbbX n
from which there is only the need to know the integral
Xdx
n +1
XdX
n +1
, but which we have shown.
And these are all the aids we require by which all the fractional formulas M
dx are to be
N
integrated. Provided M and N are integral [i. e. polynomial] functions of x. On account of
which in general the integration of all the formulas of this kind Vdx , where V is some
rational function of x, is in the rule; from which it is to be noted, unless the integration
should be algebraic, it can always be shown in terms of either logarithms or angles.
EULER'S
page 40
Therefore nothing different remains, unless that we should illustrate the method with a
few examples.
EXAMPLE 1
(A+ Bx )dx
74. With the proposed differential formula + x + xx , to define the integral of this.
Since in the numerator of the variable x there is fewer dimensions than in the
denominator, this fraction includes no integral parts. Hence the nature of the denominator
must be assessed carefully, whether it should have two real simple factors or not, and in
the first case, if the factors are equal ; from which we have three cases to be explained.
1. The denominator has both factors equal and let it be equal to (a + bx)2 and the
fraction
(A+ Bx )dx
(a +bx ) 2
is resolved into these two :

Ab Ba
b (a + bx ) 2
+ b(aB+bx ) ,
from which there is produced
(A+ Bx )dx
= bbBa(a+Ab
+ B l (a + bx) + Const. ;
bx ) bb
(a +bx )2
if the integral is thus to be determined, so that it vanishes on putting x = 0, then there is

found :
(A+ Bx )dx
(a + bx ) 2
( Ab Ba ) x
B l a + bx .
= ab(a +bx ) + bb
a
II. If the denominator has two unequal factors and let this be the proposed formula :
A+ Bx
dx ; and this fraction is resolved into these partial fractions :
(a + bx )(f + gx )
Ab Ba dx
bf -ag a +bx
Ag Bf
+ ag-bf f dx
,
+ gx
from which there is obtained the integral sought
( A+ Bx )dx
Ag Bf
f + gx
f
Ag Bf
g (ag-bf )
= m n,
Ba l a + bx +
l
(a +bx)(f + gx) = bAb
(bf -ag )
a
g (ag-bf )
+ Const .
Putting
Ab Ba
b (bf -ag )
= m + n and
in order that the integral becomes

ml
there becomes :
( a +bx )( f + gx )
af
+ nl
f ( a + bx )
;
a ( f + gx )
EULER'S
B ( bf ag )
2 Abg Bag Bbf
2m =
= B and 2n =
bg ( bf ag ) bg
bg ( bf ag )
hence there becomes :
( A+ Bx )dx
(a +bx)(f + gx) = 2Bbg l
( a +bx )( f + gx )
af
page 41
;
2 Abg B ( ag +bf ) f ( a + bx )
l
.
2bg (bf -ag )
a ( f + gx )
III. Let the simple factors of the denominator both be imaginary, in which case there is
had aa 2abxcos. + bbxx ; now as we have treated this case above [ 64], it becomes
( A+ Bx )dx
aa2abxcos. +bbxx
Bl
= bb
a
Ab + Ba cos .
+ abb sin .
bx sin .
COROLLARIUM 1
75. In the second case, in which f = a and g = b , there will be
( A+ Bx )dx
aa bbxx
B l aa bbxx + A l a +bx
= 2bb
aa
2 ab a bx
hence separately there follows :
= A l a +bx + C ,
aaAdx
bbxx 2 ab a bx
and
bbxx = B l
= B l aa aa
aaBxdx
bbxx 2bb
bb
( aa bbxx )
+ C.
COROLLARY 2
76. In the third case, if we put cos. = 0 , then we have
( A+ Bx )dx
Bl
= bb
aa +bbxx
( aa +bbxx )
a
A Arc.tang. bx + c
+ ab
a
and hence singly:
= A Arc.tang. bx
+c,
aaAdx
a
+ bbxx ab
and
Bxdx
aa +bbxx
Bl
= bb
( aa +bbxx )
a
+c
EULER'S
page 42
EXAMPLE 2
m 1
77. With the proposed differential formula x dx
n , if indeed the exponent m 1 is less
1+ x
than n, to define the integral.
In the final chapter of the Institutionum Calculi Differentialis we have found the
m 1
is to be resolved, on taking for the
simple fractions, into which this fraction x dx
n
1+ x
measure of two right angles, to be contained in this general form :

2 sin .(
2 k 1)
n
sin .(
2 k 1)
n
2 cos .
n 1 2 x cos .
( x cos .(
)
+ xx )
m( 2 k 1)
n
2 k 1)
n
( 2 k 1
n
),
where for k it is agreed to substitute all the numbers 1, 2, 3 etc., until 2k - 1 begins to
surpass the number n . [See the notes at the end of this translation.]
Hence this form is multiplied by dx and since it is to be compared with our general form
( A+ Bx )dx
aa 2 abxcos. +bbxx
then
a = 1, b = 1, =
and
( 2k 1)
n
( 2k 1) sin . m ( 2k 1) + 2 cos . ( 2k 1) cos . m ( 2k 1)

A = n2 sin .
n
n
n
n
n
or
( m 1)( 2k 1)
A = n2 cos .
n
B = n2 cos .
from which there arises

Ab + Ba cos . = n2 sin .
and
m ( 2k 1)
,
n
( 2k 1) sin . m ( 2k 1)
n
and therefore the integral of this part is :

n2 cos .
m ( 2k 1)
( 2k 1) + xx
l 1 2 x cos .
n
n
( 2k 1)
x sin .
m ( 2k 1)
n
+ n2 sin .
Arc.tang.
.
( 2k 1)
n
1 x cos .
EULER'S
page 43
And if n is an odd number, in addition to the agreed fraction dx
n(1+ x )
, the integral of
which is 1n l (1 + x) , where the upper sign prevails, if m is odd, now the lower, if m is
1+ x
m 1
even. On account of which the integral sought x dx
can be expressed in the following
n
manner
n2 cos . m l
n
x sin .
n
1 2 x cos . + xx + n2 sin . m Arc.tang.
n
n
1 x cos .
x sin .3
n2 cos . 3m l
n
n2 cos . 5m l
n
n2 cos . 7 m l
n
n
1 2 x cos . 3 + xx + n2 sin . 3m Arc.tang.
n
n
1 x cos .3
n
x sin .5
n
n
n
1 x cos .5
n
x sin .7
n
1 2 x cos . 7 + xx + n2 sin . 7 m Arc.tang.
n
n
1 x cos .7
n
etc.
according to the odd numbers being less than to n itself ; and thus the whole integral is
obtained, if n should be an even number, but if n should be an odd number, the part
1n l (1 + x) is agreed upon above according to whether m should be either an odd or even
number; from which if m = 1, + 1n l (1 + x) is agreed above.
COROLLARY 1
78. We take m = 1, in order that the form dx n is obtained, and for the various cases of n
1+ x
we arrive at :
I. 1dx
= l (1 + x )
+x
II. dx = Arc.tang.x
1+ x
III. dx = 23 cos . 3 l (1 2 x cos . 3 + xx )
1+ x
2
+ 23 sin . 3 Arc.tang.
x sin . 3
1 x cos . 3
+ 13 l (1 + x )
EULER'S
page 44
1+dxx
IV.
(1 2 x cos . 4 + xx ) + 42 sin . 4 Arc.tang.1xxsincos. .

x sin .
24 cos . 34 l (1 2 x cos . 34 + xx ) + 24 sin . 34 Arc.tang.
1 x cos .
= 24 cos . 4 l
3
4
3
4
V.
dx
1+ x5
= 52 cos . 5 l
1 2 x cos . 5 + xx
(1 2 x cos . 35 + xx )
52 cos . 35 l
VI.
+ 52 sin . 5 Arc.tang .
x sin . 5
1 x cos . 5
x sin . 35
1 x cos . 35
+ 15 l (1 + x )

x sin .
62 cos . 36 l (1 2 x cos . 35 + xx ) + 62 sin . 36 Arc.tang .
1 x cos .
x sin .
1 x cos .
dx = 2 cos . l
6
6
1+ x 6
3
6
3
6
5
6
5
6
COROLLARY 2
79. In place of the sines and cosines the values are to be substituted, where this can be
conveniently done, and we obtain :
1+dxx
= 13 l
(1 x + xx ) +
1 Arc.tang . x 3 + 1 l 1 + x
)
2 x 3 (
3
or
1+dxx
= 13 l
1+ x
(1 x + xx )
+ 1 Arc.tang . x2 3x
3
Then on account of sin . 4 = cos . 4 = 1 = sin . 34 = cos . 34 there becomes

2
dx
1+ x 4
=+ 1 l
(1+ x
(1 x
)
2 + xx )
+ 1 Arc.tang.1x xx2 ,
2 2
dx
1+ x 6
=+ 1 l
(1+ x
(1 x
)
3 + xx )
+ 16 Arc.tang.
2 2
then
2 3
2 + xx
3 + xx
3 x (1 xx )
1 4 xx + x 4
EULER'S
page 45
EXAMPLE 3
m 1
80. With the proposed differential formula x dx
n , if indeed the exponent m 1 is less
1+ x
than n, to define the integral itself.

m 1
The part of the fraction of the function x n is required to come from some factor
1+ x
contained in this form :
2 sin . 2 kn sin . 2 mkn 2 cos . 2 mkn ( x cos . 2 kn )

n(1 2 x cos . 2 kn + xx )
( A+ Bx )dx
which on comparison with our form aa 2abxcos. +bbxx gives

a = 1, b = 1, = 2kn ,
A = n2 sin . 2k sin . 2mk + n2 cos . 2k cos . 2mk , B = n2 cos . 2mk
n
n
n
n
n
and hence
Ab + Ba cos . = n2 sin . 2k sin . 2mk .
n
n
From which the integral hence arising is equal to
n2 cos . 2mk l
n
x sin . 2 k
n ,
1 2 x cos . 2k + xx + n2 sin . 2mk Arc.tang.
2
n
n
1 x cos . k
n
where all the successive values for k ,1, 2, 3 etc. must be substituted, as long as 2k
is less than n. These parts of the integral arising, 1n l (1 x ) and 1n l (1 + x ) , are to be
added above from the fraction n(11 x) and, if n is an even number, from the fraction
1
, where the upper sign prevails if m is even, and truly the lower, if m is odd. [A
n (1+ x )
correction to the first edition has been added here, by the editor of the O. O. edition]
On account of which the integral
x1+ xdx can be expressed in this way :

m 1
EULER'S
page 46
1n l (1 x )
x sin . 2
n2 cos . 2m l
n
n2 cos . 4m l
n
(1 2x cos . 4n + xx ) +
2 sin . 4m
n
n
n2 cos . 6m l
n
(1 2x cos . 6n + xx ) +
2 sin . 6m
n
n
n
1 2 x cos . + xx + n2 sin . 2m Arc.tang.
n
n
1 x cos . 2
n
x sin . 4
n
Arc.tang.
1 x cos . 4
n
x sin .6
n
Arc.tang.
1 x cos .6
n
etc.
COROLLARY
81. If m = 1 and for n successively the numbers 1, 2, 3 etc. are substituted, in order that
we arrive at the following integrations :
I. 1dx
= l (1 x )
x
(1+ x )
II. 1dxxx = 12 l (1 x ) + 12 l (1 + x ) = 12 l
(1 x )
III.
1dxx
= 13 l (1 x ) 23 cos . 23 l
(1 2 x cos . 23 + xx )
IV.
dx
1 x 4
= 14 l (1 x ) 24 cos . 24 l
x sin . 23
1 x cos . 23
(1 2 x cos . 24 + xx )
x sin . 24
1 x cos . 24
+ 24 l (1 + x )
V.
dx
1 x5
52 cos . 45 l
VI.
dx
1 x 6

2
5
2
5
= 15 l (1 x ) 52 cos . 25 l
4
5
4
5
= 16 l (1 x ) 62 cos . 26 l
62 cos . 46 l
+ 16 l (1 + x )
1 2 x cos . 26 + xx
(1 2 x cos . 45 + xx )
x sin . 46
1 x cos . 46
x sin . 26
1 x cos . 26
EULER'S
page 47
EXAMPLE 4
82. With the proposed differential formula
(x
m 1
+ x n m1 dx
1+ x
on n > m 1 arising, to define
the integral of this.

From Example 2 it is apparent that any part of the integral in general, on taking i for
some odd number not greater than n,
n2 cos . im l
n
x sin .i
n ,
1 2 x cos . i + xx + n2 sin . im Arc.tang.
n
n
1 x cos .i
n
i ( n m )
n2 cos .
l
n
x sin .i
i ( n m )
n .
1 2 x cos . i + xx + n2 sin .
Arc.tang.
n
n
1 x cos .i
Now there is
cos .
i ( n m )
= cos . i imn = cos . imn
n
and
i ( n m )
= sin . i imn = + sin . imn ,
n
from which the logarithmic parts cancel each other, and the part of the integral in general
is equal to :
sin .
x sin .i
n .
4 sin . im Arc.tang.
n
n
1 x cos .i
n
Hence there is put in place the angle of convenience n = and there becomes :
(x
m 1
+ x n m1 dx
1+ x
.
= + n4 sin .m Arc.tang. 1x xsin
cos
.3
+ n4 sin .3m Arc.tang. 1x xsin
cos 3
.5
cos 5
.i
+ n4 sin .im Arc.tang. 1x xsin
cos i
EULER'S
page 48
on taking for i the greatest odd number not greater than n. If the number n is itself odd,
the part arising from the position i = n vanishes on account of sin. mn = 0. Hence it is to
be noted here that the whole integral is to expressed by pure angles.
COROLLARY
83. In a like manner the following integral can be elicited, where only in this manner the
following integral is elicited, where logarithms alone are left, on retaining n = :
(x
m 1
x n m1 dx
1+ x n
(1 2 x cos . + xx )
= n4 cos .m l
n4 cos .3m l
(1 2 x cos .3 + xx )
n4 cos .5m l
(1 2 x cos .5 + xx )
n4 cos .im l
(1 2 x cos .i + xx ) ,
clearly as long as the odd number i does not exceed the exponent n.
EXAMPLE 5
84. With the proposed differential formula
(x
m 1
x n m1 dx
1+ x n
with n > m 1 arising, to define
the integral of this.

From example 3 it can be deduced that any part of the integral, if indeed for the sake
of gravity we put n = , can be written as
n2 cos .2mk l
.2 mk
(1 2 x cos .2k + xx ) + n2 sin .2mk Arc.tang. 1xxsin
cos .2 mk
+ n2 cos .2k ( n m ) l
But there is
and
.2mk
(1 2 x cos .2k + xx ) + n2 sin .2k ( n m ) Arc.tang. 1xxsin
cos .2mk
cos .2k ( n m ) = cos .( 2k 2km ) = cos .2km

sin .2k ( n m ) = sin .( 2k 2km ) = sin .2km ,
from which the general part goes into

4 sin .2km Arc.tang. x sin .2k ,
n
1 x cos .2m
EULER'S
page 49
from which hence this integration is deduced :
(x
m 1
x n m1 dx
1+ x
.2
= + n4 sin .2m Arc.tang. 1x xsin
cos 2
.4
cos 4
.6 ,
cos 6
with the even numbers increasing all the while, as long as they do not exceed the
exponent n.
COROLLARY
85. Also from the same place this integral is completed with n = in place :
(x
m 1
+ x n m1 dx
1 x n
= n2 l (1 x )
n4 cos .2m l
(1 2 x cos .2 + xx )
n4 cos .4m l
(1 2 x cos .4 + xx )
n4 cos .6m l
(1 2 x cos .6 + xx ) ,
where also the even numbers are not to be continued beyond the term n.
EXAMPLE 6
86. With the proposed differential dy = 3 dx 4 , to find the integral of this.
x (1+ x ) 1 x
The fractional function attached to dx following the factors of the denominator is

1
2
x 3 (1+ x ) (1 x )(1+ xx )
which is resolved into these simple fractions

dy
1 1 +1
1
9 + 1 + 1+ x = ,
x 3 x 2 x 4(1+ x )2 8(1+ x ) 8(1 x ) 4(1+ xx ) dx
from which there is elicited by integration:

y = 1 2 + 1x + lx + 1 98 l (1 + x ) 81 l (1 x )
4(1+ x )
2x
+ 18 l (1 + xx ) + 14 Arc.tang.x,
which expression can be changed into this form :
xx + 1 Arc.tang .x,
y = C + 2+ 2 x +5 xx l 1+xx + 18 l 11+ xx
4
4 xx(1+ x )
EULER'S
page 50
SCHOLIUM
87. Therefore by this the chapter has been made clear, so that nothing further from this
dy
kind can be desired. Hence as often as a function y of x of this kind is sought, so that dx
is equal to some rational function of x, so the integration presents no difficulty, except
perhaps in the elucidation of the particular factor of the denominator where the teaching
of algebra has not been sufficient; then indeed the difficulty must be attributed to the
defects of the algebra, not the method of integration which we have treated here. Then
dy
also chiefly it is agreed to be noted always, since dx is put equal to a rational function of
x, the function of y, unless it is algebraic, does not involve other transcending functions
in addition to logarithms and angles ; where indeed here it is to be observed always that
hyperbolic logarithms are to be understood, since the differential of lx in not equal to 1x ,
unless the hyperbolic logarithm is taken ; but the reduction of these to common
logarithms is very simple, thus so that hence the application of the calculus to the practice
is not bothered by any impediment. Whereby we may progress to these other cases, in
dy
which the formula dx is equal to an irrational function of x, where indeed at first it must
be noted, whenever this function by a suitable substitution can be reduced to rationals, the
case to be returned to this chapter. Just as if there should be
3
dy = 1+ x 3 xx dx,
1+ x
it is clear on putting x = z , from which there arises dx = 6 z 5dz , to become
(1+ z z ) 6 z 5dz
3
dy =
1+ zz
and thus
dy
= 6 z 7 + 6z 6 + 6 z 5 6 z 4 + 6zz 6 + 1+6zz ,
dz
from which on integrating

y = 34 z 8 + 76 z 7 + z 6 65 z 5 + 2 z 3 6 z + 6Arc.tang .z
and on restoring the value :

6
y = 34 x 3 x + 76 x 6 x + x 65 x5 + 2 x 6 6 x + 6Arc.tang .6 x + C.
EULER'S
page 51
APPENDICES FROM
INTRODUCTIO IN ANALYSIN INFINITORUM CH.2 &
INSTITUTIONES CALCULI DIFFERENTIALIS CH.18,Part 2.
In Ch. 9 145 of the Introductio..., Euler proceeds as follows : The
quadratic p qz + rzz in the variable z has imaginary roots if 4 pr > qq or
q
2 pr
< 1. Since
the sines and cosines of angles are less than 1, then the formula p qz + rzz has simple
imaginary factors, if
q
should be the sine or cosine of some angle. Hence, let
2 pr
q
2 pr
= cos . , or q = 2 pr cos .
and the trinomial p qz + zz contains the imaginary simple factors. But lest the
irrationality should produce any trouble, I assume this form pp 2 pqz cos . + qqzz , and
the simple imaginary factors of this are these :
qz p cos . + 1 sin . and qz p cos . 1 sin . .
Where indeed it is apparent, if cos . = 1 , then both the factors are equal and real since
sin . = 0 . [In modern terms, we would say that qz pei
and qz pei are the
n
factors, and powers of z can be expressed in the form z n = r n cos . 1 sin . ]. In
147, Euler assumes DeMoivre's Theorem :
( cos .
and hence
1 sin .
= cos .n 1 sin .n ,
z n = r n cos .n 1 sin .n , where r = q
In 150 Euler examines the function a n + z n , and the form of the trinomial factors of
p
this factor pp 2 pqz cos . + qqzz is to be determined. On putting r = q into the equation,
there are produced these two equations : a n = r n cos .n , and 0 = r n sin .n . From the
latter equation we must have, for some integer k, n = 2k , or n = ( 2k + 1) ; but in
the former equation, we must choose n = ( 2k + 1) , in order that we have a n r n = 0 ,
and hence r = a = q . Hence in the above equation, p = a, q = 1, and = ( 2k + 1) n .
p
EULER'S
page 52
Hence the quadratic factor with conjugate roots of the function a n + z n can be shown to
be aa 2az cos . 2kn+1 + zz , where k is less than n. Euler goes on to look at numerous
cases involving this factorization.
The partial fraction reduction quoted above in Examples 2 and 3 comes from the
Institutionum...., Part 2, Ch.18, which we now address at length, we take up the story at
the end of 406 to Example 1 of 417 in translation :
P , then the values of the factors of the
If the rational fraction is expressed by Q
denominator can be found from the resolution of the equation Q = 0 , and here we make
use of a method involving the differential calculus in order that any simple factors of the
denominator can thus be defined.
P to have a factor f + gx ,
407. Therefore we arrange the denominator Q of the fraction Q
thus so that Q = ( f + gx ) S , and indeed here, neither does S contain in addition the same
factor f + gx . Let the simple fraction arising from this factor be equal to f +Agx and the
P.
complement has a form of this kind VS , thus so that f +Agx + VS = Q
P A =
P
f +Agx = P AS , and thus V = P AS .
Hence there arises : VS = Q
f + gx ( f + gx ) S
( f + gx ) S
( f + gx )
Therefore, as V is an integral function of x, it is necessary that P AS should be divisible
by f + gx ; and therefore, if there is put f + gx = 0 or x = g , then the expression

P AS vanishes, [as f + gx is a factor of P AS or x =
f
g
is a root of this polynomial].
f
Hence on making x = g , since P AS = 0 , then A = PS , [for this value of x] as now we
( f + gx ) P , if there is
Q
have found above. But since S = f + gx , then there arises A =
Q
f
put f + gx = 0 or x = g everywhere. Now since in this case both the numerator
( f + gx ) P as well as the denominator Q vanish here, by means of that, which we are

about to set out in the investigation of fractions of this kind, then if indeed there is put
f
x= g ,
A=
( f + gx ) dP + Pgdx .
dQ
But in this case on account of ( f + gx ) dP = 0 then A =
Pgdx
.
dQ
EULER'S
page 53
[One can see that Euler is thinking of the ratio becoming zero on zero when x = g , and
so the ratio is to the differential of the numerator to the differential of the denominator.
One can see also that the problem is essentially an application of L'Hpital's Rule : as is
well known, in the neighbourhood of a common simple zero x = a of well-behaved
functions r and s of x, or a common root of polynomials, the values of the functions at a
are represented by their differentials, and it is an easy matter to show that
r ( a ) r' ( a )
=
x a s ( a ) s' ( a )
lim
, where the rule can be extended to higher derivatives if necessary .]
P has a simple factor

408. Therefore if the denominator Q of the proposed fraction Q
Pgdx
f + gx , from that there arises the simple fraction f +Agx with A =

being present,
dQ
f
after everywhere here the value g is put in place of x arising from the equation
f + gx = 0 must be substituted. Hence, if Q is not expressed in factors, this division can
often be omitted without any bother, particularly if the denominator Q has indefinite
exponents, since the value of A can be obtained from the formula
Pgdx
dQ
. But if the
denominator now was expressed in factors, thus in order that hence the value of S should
be at once apparent, then the other expression is to be preferred, in which we found
f
A = PS on putting everywhere equally x = g . And thus for finding the value of A itself
in whatever case that formula can be used, which is seen to be the more convenient and
expedient. But we illustrate the use of the new formula with some examples.
EXAMPLE 1
Let this fraction be proposed
x9
1+ x17
, a simple fraction of which is required to be defined
from the factor of the denominator 1 + x .
Since here Q = 1 + x17 , even if 1 + x is agreed to be a factor of this, yet, if as the first
method demands, we wish to divide by that, there is produced
S = 1 x + xx x3 + ... + x16
Therefore it is more convenient to use the new formula A =
Pgdx
dQ
g = 1 and P= x9, on account of dQ = 17 x16dx there becomes A =
putting x = 1, from which there arises A =

factor of the denominator 1 + x is
1 .
17(1+ x )
1
17
; and thus since f= 1,

x9
1
16 =
17 x
17 x 7
and on
, and the simple fraction arising from the
EULER'S
page 54
EXAMPLE 2
For the proposed fraction
x
1 x 2 n
, to find the simple fraction arising from the factor 1 x
of the denominator.
On account of the proposed factor 1 x there is f = 1 and g = 1 . Then the
denominator 1 x gives dQ = 2nx 2n 1dx , from which because of P = x m there is

2n
obtained A =
Pgdx
xm
=
2nx 2 n1
dQ
becomes A =
1
1
, thus so that the simple fraction is
2n
2 n(1 x )
. And on putting from the equation 1 x , x = 1 there
EXAMPLE 3
For the proposed fraction

1 x of the denominator.
x
1 4 x k +3 x n
, to find the simple fraction arising from the factor
Hence here there becomes f = 1, g = 1, P = x m ,and Q = 1 4 xk + 3 x n and

xm
dQ
k 1
n 1
=
4
kx
+
3
nx
;
from
which
there
arises
A
=
and on putting
dx
4 kx k 1 + 3nx n1
1
x = 1 then A =
. The simple fraction arising from this simple factor of the
4 k 3n
1
.
denominator 1 x is now
( 4k 3n )(1 x )
P to have the square factor

409. Now we put the denominator Q of the fraction Q
( f + gx )2 and the simple fractions hence arising are
A
2
( f + gx )
+ fB
.
+ gx
Let Q = ( f + gx ) S and the complement = VS , thus in order that

2
V
S
P
=Q
A
2
( f + gx )
P AS B( f + gx ) S
fB
and V =
2
+ gx
( f + gx )
Now because V is an integral function, it is necessary that P AS B ( f + gx ) S

is divisible by ( f + gx ) ; and since S does not contain a further factor f +gx,
2
2
A B ( f + gx ) is divisible by ( f + gx ) , and thus with the
also this expression P
S
f
factor f + gx = 0 or x = g not only this expression, but also the differential of this
f
Bgdx . Therefore on putting x = , there arises from the first

vanishes , d . P
S
g
EULER'S
page 55
1 = d . P ; from
equation A = PS , and from the second equation there now arises B gdx
S
which the values of the fractions sought
A
2
+
f
( gx )
+ fB
can be found .
+ gx
EXAMPLE
From the proposed fraction,
x
1 4 x 3 + 3 x 4
the denominator of which has the factor (1 x ) ,

2
to find all the simple fractions thus arising.

Since here there is f = 1, g = 1, P = x m and Q = 1 4 x3 + 3x 4
then [on factorising the denominator], S = 1 + 2 x + 3 xx , then
P
S
= 1+ 2 xx +3 xx and d . PS =
mx m1dx + 2( m 1) x m dx +3( m 2 ) x m+1dx
(1+ 2 x +3 xx )
Hence on putting x = 1 there arises

A = 16 and B = 1 6m368 = 4183m ;
from which the fractions sought are
43m .
1
2 +
18(1 x )
6(1 x )
P have three equal simple fractions, or

410. Let the denominator Q of the fraction Q
Q = ( f + gx ) S and let the simple fractions arising from the cube of the factor ( f + gx )
3
be these
A
3
+
f
( gx )
B
2
+
f
( gx )
( f + gx )
P is
now the complement of these fractions to be established for the proposed fraction Q
equal to VS and it follows that
V=
P AS BS ( f + gx ) CS ( f + gx )
( f + gx )
2
Whereby this expression PS A B ( f + gx ) C ( f + gx ) = 0 is divisible by ( f + gx )3 ;
f
from which on putting f + gx = 0 or x = g not only this expression, but also the first
f
and second differentials are able to become equal to 0. Clearly on putting x = g
EULER'S
page 56

P
S
2
A B ( f + gx ) C ( f + gx ) = 0
d . PS Bgdx 2Cgdx ( f + gx ) = 0
dd . PS 2Cg 2dx 2 = 0.
Hence from the first equation there becomes
A = PS .
Now from the second
1 d.P .
B = gdx
S
And from the third there is defined

C=
1 dd . P .
S
2 g 2 dx 2
P has the factor f + gx n ,

411. Hence generally, if the denominator Q of the fraction Q
(
)
thus in order that Q = ( f + gx ) S ,with these simple fractions arising from the factor
n
( f + gx )n
:
A
( f + gx )
( f + gx )
n 1
( f + gx )
n2
( f + gx )
n 3
( f + gx )
n4
+ etc.,
until finally the fraction is arrived at, of which the denominator is f + gx, if the method is
put in place as before, then this expression is found:
P A - B f + gx C f + gx 2 D f + gx 3 E f + gx 4 etc.
(
) (
)
(
)
(
)
S
which must be divisible by ( f + gx ) ; hence this expression as well as the individual

n
differentials of this as far as the degree n 1 must vanish when we set x = g

f
From which equations it can be concluded on putting x = g everywhere :
EULER'S
A = PS
1 d. P
B = 1gdx
S
C=
1
12 g 2 dx 2
D=
1
123 g 3 dx3
E=
1
1234 g 4 dx 4
page 57
dd . PS
d 3 . PS
d 4 . PS
etc.
Where indeed it is to be observed it is required to take the differentials themselves of
P
S
beforehand, as in place of x there is to be put g ;
412. Hence in this way these numbers A ,B,C ,D etc can be expressed more easily than
in the manner treated in the Introductio, and the values of these can be found more
readily on many occasions too by this new method. Which comparison by which, in the
previous manner, we can define the values of the letters A ,B,C ,D etc , can be put in
f
place more easily : Put x = g

For the variable x , the remainder is put in place
P AS = P,
A= P
S
f + gx
B= S
P BS
f + gx
= Q,
C=Q
S
QCS
f + gx
= R,
D= R
S
R DS
f + gx
= S,
E=S
S
P should not have all real simple factors,

413. But if the denominator Q of the fraction Q
then two of the imaginary factors are to be taken together, the product of which is real.
Hence let a factor of the denominator Q be ff 2 fgx cos + ggxx , which on being put
equal to zero gives this two-fold imaginary value :
f
x = g cos
sin ;
g 1
from which there arises
xn =
fn
gn
cos n
fn
sin n .
g n 1
EULER'S
page 58
We put the denominator Q = ( ff 2 fgx cos + ggxx ) S and in addition S is not to be
divisible by ff 2 fgx cos + ggxx . Let the fraction originating from this denominator be
A +ax
ff 2 fgx cos + ggxx
P is equal to V ; then
and the complement for the proposed fraction Q
S
P ( A + ax ) S
V = ff 2 fgx cos + ggxx ,

from which P ( A + ax ) S and in addition also PS A ax is divisible by
ff 2 fgx cos + ggxx . Hence PS A ax vanishes, if there is put
ff 2 fgx cos + ggxx = 0 , that is, if there is put either

f
x = g cos +
sin
g 1
or
x = g cos
sin
g 1
414. Because P and S are integral [i. e. polynomial] functions of x, the substitution can
be made separately into each in turn ; and because for any power of x, for example x n ,
this binomial must be substituted
xn =
in the first place we can put
fn
gn
fn
gn
cos n
fn
sin n ,
g n 1
cos n for x n everywhere, and with this done P is
fn
changed into P and S into S . Then in place of x n everywhere there is put n sin n and
g
with this done P becomes p and S becomes s ; where it is to be noted that before these
substitutions each function P and S must be expanded out completely, thus in order that,
if perhaps factors are to be involved, then these are to be removed. From these values
f
P , p, S, s found it is evident, if there is put x = g cos

sin , the function P is
g 1
changed into P
Hence since
p
1
and the function S changed into S s
P A ax or P A + ax S
(
)
S
p
1
must vanish in each case, then
af
af
sin S s
= A + g cos
g 1
1
from which on account of the sign condition these two equations arise :
EULER'S
page 59

af S
af s
P = AS + g cos g sin
af s
af S
p = As + g cos + g sin ,
from which on eliminating A there arises
Sp- sP =
and thus there becomes
a=
af S2 + s2
) sin
g ( Sp-sP )
f S2 + s2 sin
Then on eliminating sin there becomes
)(
af
SP + sp = S2 + s2 A + g cos .
Hence
A=
SP+sp ( Sp-sP ) cos
S2 + s2
S2 + s2 sin
415. Since now there shall be S = ff 2 fgx cos + ggxx ,

because on putting ff 2 fgx cos + ggxx = 0
both the numerator as well as the denominator vanish, in this case there arises
dQ:dx
S = 2 ggx 2 fgcos
Now we may put, if
fn
gn
dQ
cos n is substituted everywhere, the function dx to become Q ,
but if there is put in place everywhere

f
fn
gn
sin n , that goes into q ; and it is evident, if

q
dQ
sin , the function dx becomes Q

there is put x = g cos
g 1
1
From which the function S is changed into
Qq: 1
.
2 fgsin : 1
Therefore since S = S s with the same value for x put in place, there is obtained :
1
q
2 fgS
=
sin 2 fg s sin .
1
1
Hence there becomes

Q
s = 2 fg sin
and S = 2 fg sin
EULER'S
page 60
With these values in place there arises
a=
and
A=
2 gg ( pq+PQ )
Q2 +q2
2 fg ( Pq-pQ ) sin 2 fg ( pq+PQ) cos

.
Q2 +q2
Q2 +q2
416. Hence therefore a suitable ratio is obtained and here a simple fraction can be formed
from whatever the factor of the second power, since the denominator of the proposed
denominator is retained in the computation, since we avoid a division, in which the value
of the letter S must be defined and which often is more than a little troublesome.
P has such a factor
Therefore if the denominator Q of the fraction Q
ff 2 fgx cos + ggxx = 0 , a simple fraction arising from this factor can be defined in
the following manner, so that we may produce :
+ax
= ff 2 fgxAcos
.
+ ggxx
fn
There is put x = g cos and for whatever the power of x n there is written n cos n ;
g
dQ
with which done P is changed into P and the function dx into Q . Then likewise there
fn
dQ
is put x = g sin and any power of this x n = n sin n and P is changed into p and dx
g
into q . And in this manner with the values of the letters P , Q, p and q found, A and a
can thus be found, in order that there becomes
A=
2 fg ( Pq-pQ ) sin
Q2 +q2
a=
2 fg ( pq+PQ ) cos
Q2 +q2
2 gg ( pq+PQ )
.
Q2 +q2
Hence the fraction arising from the factor ff 2 fgx cos + ggxx of the denominator Q is
given by
2 fg ( Pq-pQ ) sin + 2 g ( PQ+pq)( gx f cos )
( Q +q )( ff 2 fgx cos + ggxx )

2
EULER'S
page 61
EXAMPLE 1
If this fraction is proposed
xm
a +bx n
, the denominator of which a + bx n has this factor
ff 2 fgx cos + ggxx , to find the simple fraction agreeing with this factor.
dQ
Because here P = x m and Q = a + bx n , then dx = nbx n and thus there arises
P=
fm
gm
Q=
nbf n1
cos ( n 1) ,
g n1
cos m ,
p=
fn
gn
q=
nbf n1
g n1
sin m ,
sin ( n 1) .
From these there becomes
Q2 + q2 =
n 2b 2 f (
2 n 1
g( )
2 n 1)
PQ - pq =
nbf m+ n1
sin ( n m 1) ,
g m+ n1
PQ + pq =
nbf m+ n1
cos ( n m 1) .
g m+ n1
and
On account of which the simple fraction sought is

2 g nm ( f sin sin( n m 1) + gx cos ( n m 1) f cos cos( n m 1) )
nbf nm1 ( ff 2 fgx cos + ggxx )
or
2 g nm ( gx cos ( n m 1) f cos ( n m ) )
nbf n m1 ( ff 2 fgx cos + ggxx )
EXAMPLE 2
If this fraction should be proposed, m 1 n , the denominator of which has the factor
x
( a +bx )
ff 2 fgx cos + ggxx ; to find the simple fraction arising from this.
dQ
As there is p= 1 and Q = ax m + bx m + n , then dx = max m 1 + (m + n)bx m + n 1
and thus on putting x n =
fn
cos n , on account of P = x 0 , P = 1 ,and
gn
( m + n )bf
maf m1
m 1 cos ( m 1) +
g
g m+ n1
m + n 1
Q=
fn
and [on putting x n = n sin n ] p = 0 and
g
cos ( m + n 1)
EULER'S
m 1
q=
maf
g m1
page 62

( m + n )bf m+n1
sin ( m 1) +
sin ( m + n 1) .
g m+ n1
Hence
A 2 + q2 =
m2 a 2 f (
g m1
2 m 1)
2 m( m + n ) abf 2 m+ n2
( m + n ) b2 f (
cos
n
+
2 m + n 1)
g 2 m+ n 2
g(
2 m + n 1)
For if now ff 2 fgx cos + ggxx is a divisor of a + bx n , then

a+
bf n
bf n
bbf 2 n
.
n cos n = 0 and
n sin n = 0 , on account of which aa =
g
g
g 2n
Hence there becomes
A 2 + q2 =
( m+ n )
g
bbf
2( m + n 1)
2( m + n 1)
m( 2n + m )aaf
g
2( m 1)
2( m 1)
nnaaf (
2 m 1
g( )
2 m 1)
nnbbf (
2 m + n 1)
g(
2 m + n 1)
Then there now becomes
( m + n )bf
maf m1
sin ( m 1) +
g m1
g m+ n1
m + n 1
Pq - pQ =
sin ( m + n 1)
bf m+ n1
g m+ n1
bf m+ n1
n cos n sin ( m 1) + ( m + n ) sin n cos ( m 1)
g m+ n1
( ( m + n ) sin ( m + n 1) m cos n sin ( m 1) )

(
and
Pq + pQ =
bf m+ n1
g m+ n1
( ( m + n ) cos ( m + n 1) m cos n cos ( m 1) ) .
Either since ff 2 fg cos + ggxx is also a divisor of ax m 1 + bx m + n 1 , then

af m1
bf m+ n1
cos ( m + n 1) = 0
m 1 cos ( m 1) +
g
g m+ n1
and
af m1
bf m+ n1
sin ( m + n 1) = 0 ,
m 1 sin ( m 1) +
g
g m+ n1
from which there becomes
Q=
nbf m+ n1
cos ( m + n 1) and
g m+n1
q=
nbf m+ n1
sin ( m + n 1)
g m+ n1
or
Q=
naf m1
cos ( m 1)
g m1
and q =
From which there results the fraction sought
naf m1
g m1
sin ( m 1)
EULER'S
2 g m ( f cos m gx cos ( m 1) )
naf m1 ( ff 2 fgx cos + ggxx )
page 63
Which formula follows from the first example, if m is put negative, from which there was
no need to have put in place this particular example.
EXAMPLE 3
If the denominator of this fraction
xm
should have a factor of the form
a + bx n + cx 2 n
ff 2 fgx cos + ggxx , to find the simple fraction arising from this factor.
If ff 2 fgx cos + ggxx is a factor of the denominator a + bx n + cx 2n , then, as we

have shown above,
a+
bf n
cf 2 n
bf n
cf 2 n
cos
n
+
cos
2
n
=
0
and
sin
n
+
sin 2n = 0
gn
g 2n
gn
g 2n
Therefore since there shall be P = x m and Q = a + bx n + cx 2n , then

dQ
= nbx n 1 + 2ncx 2n 1 ,
dx
from which there is produced
P=
Q=
q=
fm
cos m and
gm
p=
fm
sin m ,
gm
nbf n1
2ncf 2 n1
cos ( 2n 1) ,
n 1 cos ( n 1) +
g
g 2 n1
2 ncf 2 n1
nbf n1
sin ( 2n 1) .
n 1 sin ( n 1) +
g
g 2 n1
On account of which we have

A 2 +q2 =
n2 f ( )
2 n 1
g( )
2 n 1
bb + 4bcf n cos n + 4ccf 2 n
gn
g 2n
But from the two former equations there is

f 2n
2bcf n
ccf 2 n
cos n + 2 n = aa
2 n bb +
n
g
g
g
and thus
4bcf n
2 g 2 n aa
2ccf 2 n
cos
n
2
bb
;
gn
f 2n
g 2n
EULER'S
page 64
from which value substituted there, there becomes

n 2 f 2 n 2 2aag 2 n
2ccf 2 n
A 2 + q2 = 2 n2 2 n bb + 2 n
g
g
f
or
2
A +q =
n 2 2aag 4 n bbf 2 n g 2 n + 2ccf 4 n

ffg
4 n2
).
Then there becomes
Pq - pQ =
nbf m+ n1
2 ncf m+ 2 n1
sin
n
+
sin ( 2n m 1) ,
(
)
g m+ n1
g m+ 2 n1
PQ + pq =
2 ncf m+ 2 n1
nbf m+ n1
cos
n
1
+
cos ( 2n m 1) .
(
)
g m+ n1
g m+2 n1
From which values found the simple fraction sought becomes

2 fg ( Pq-pQ ) sin + 2 g ( PQ+pq)( gx f cos )
( Q +q )( ff 2 fgx cos + ggxx )

2
417. But these values are more easily expressed if we determine these factors themselves
from the denominator. Therefore let the denominator of the proposed fraction be
a + bx n ;
of which if the trinomial factor is put in place ff 2 fgx cos + ggxx ,
there will be, as we have shown in the Introductio,
a+
bf n
bf n
sin n = 0
n cosn = 0 and
g
gn
therefore since sin n = 0 , either n = (2k - 1) or n = 2k ; in the first case then

cos n = 1 , in the latter cos n = +1 . Hence if a and b are positive quantities, in the first
case only the condition is had, in which there arises a =
1
bf n
and hence
gn
f = a n and g = b n .
But we may retain in place of these irrational quantities the letters f and g or we may put
rather a = f n and b = g n , thus in order that the factors of this function are to be found :
f n + g n xn .
(2 k -1)
, where k can be designated to some positive number, but
n
indeed numbers for k greater than 2kn-1 are not to be taken, than which return 2kn-1 less
n
n n
Therefore since =
than unity ; hence the factors of the proposed fraction f + g x are the following :
EULER'S
page 65
ff 2 fgxcos n + ggxx
ff 2 fgxcos 3n + ggxx
ff 2 fgxcos 5n + ggxx
etc,
where it is to be noted that if n is an odd number, then this one binomial factor is present,
f + gx
but if n is an even number then no binomial factor is present.
EXAMPLE 1
To resolve this fraction
xm
into its simple fractions.
f + g n xn
n
Since a factor of each trinomial denominator is contained in this form

ff 2 fgxcos
( 2k 1)
n
+ ggxx ,
( 2k 1)
,
in example 1 in the preceding paragraph, a = f n , b = g n , and =
n
from which there shall be
sin ( n m 1) = sin (m + 1) = sin
( m+1)( 2k 1)
and
cos ( n m 1) = cos (m + 1) = cos
( m+1)( 2k 1)
n
Hence from this factor this simple fraction arises

2 f sin .(
2 k 1)
n
sin .(
nf
m +1)( 2 k 1)
n
n m 1
2 cos .(
( gx f cos .(
)
+ ggxx )
m +1)( 2 k 1)
n
( ff 2 fgx cos .
2 k 1)
n
( 2 k 1
n
On account of which the proposed fraction can be resolved into these simple parts :
( gx f cos .n )
nf
g ( ff 2 fgx cos .n + ggxx )
3 m +1
3 m +1
2 f sin .3n sin . ( n ) 2 cos . ( n ) ( gx f cos . 3n )
+
nf nm1 g m ( ff 2 fgx cos .3n + ggxx )
5 m +1
5 m +1
2 f sin .5n sin . ( n ) 2 cos . ( n ) ( gx f cos .5n )
+
nf nm1 g m ( ff 2 fgx cos .5n + ggxx )
2 f sin .n sin .(
m +1)
n
n m 1 m
2 cos .(
etc.
m +1)
n
EULER'S
page 66
Therefore if n were an even number, in this way all the simple fractions arise;
but if n should be an odd number, on account of the binomial factor f +gx this must be
added to the resulting fractions above
1
n
m
1
nf
g m ( f + gx )
where the sign + prevails, if m is an even number, and conversely for the sign. If m
should be a number greater than n, then to these fractions the above integral parts of this
kind must be added
Ax m n + Bx m 2n + Cx m 3n + Dx m 4n + etc.,
as long as the exponents remain positive, and there becomes

Ag n = 1 hence
A = 1n
Af n + Bg n = 0
B=
fn
g 2n
Bf n + Cg n = 0
C=+
f 2n
g 3n
Cf n + Dg n = 0
D=
f 3n
g 4n
etc.
etc.
EULER'S
page 67
LIBER PRIOR
PARS PRIMA
SEU
METHODUS INVESTIGANDI FUNCTIONES UNIUS
VARIABILIS
EX DATA RELATIONE QUACUNQUE DIFFERENTIALIUM
PRIMI GRADUS
SECTIO PRIMA
DE
INTEGRATIONE FORMULARUM
DIFFERENTIALIUM.
EULER'S
page 68
CAPUT I
DE INTEGRATIONE FORMULARUM
DIFFERENTIALIUM RATIONALIUM
DEFINITIO
40. Formula differentialis rationalis est, quando variabilis x, cuius functio

quaeritur, differentiale dx multiplicatur in functionem rationalem ipsius x, seu si
X designet functionem rationalem ipsius x, haec formula differentialis Xdx dicitur
rationalis.
COROLLARIUM 1
41. In hoc ergo capite eiusmodi functio ipsius x quaeritur, quae si ponatur y, ut
aequetur functioni rationali ipsius x, seu posita tali functione = X ut sit
dy
dx
dy
dx
= X.
COROLLARIUM 2
42. Hinc quaeritur eiusmodi functio ipsius x, cuius differentiale sit = Xdx; huius ergo
integrale, quod ita indicari solet Xdx , praebebit functionem quaesitam.
COROLLARlUM 3
43. Quodsi P fuerit eiusmodi functio ipsius x, ut eius differentiale dPsit = Xdx, quoniam.
quantitatis P + C idem est differentiale, formulae propositae Xdx integrale completum est
P + C.
SCHOLION 1
44. Ad libri promi partem priorem huiusmodi referuntur quaestiones, quibus functiones
solius variabilis x ex data differentialium primi gradus relatione quaeruntur. Scilicet si
functio quaesita = y et
dy
dx
= p, id praestari oportet, ut proposita aequatione quacunque
inter ternas quantitates x, y et p inde indoles functionis y seu aequatio inter x et y, elisa
littera p, inveniatur. Quaestio autem sic in genere proposita vires Analyseos adeo
superare videtur, ut eius solutio nunquam expectari queat. In casibus igitur
simplicioribus vires nostrae sunt exercendae, inter quos primum occurrit casus,
quo p functioni cuipiam ipsius x, puta X, aequatur, ut sit
dy
dx
= X seu dy = Xdx
ideoque integrale y = Xdx requiratur, in quo primam sectionem collocamus.

Verum et hic casus pro varia indole functionis X latissime patet ac plurimis
difficultatibus implicatur, unde in hoc capite eiusmodi tantum quaestiones evolvere
instituimus, in quibus ista functio X est rationalis, deinceps ad functiones irrationales
EULER'S
page 69
atque adeo transcendentes progressuri. Hinc ista pars commode in duas sectiones
subdividitur, in quarum altera integratio formularum simplicium, quibus p =
dy
dx
functioni
tantum ipsius x aequatur, est tradenda, in altera autem rationem integrandi doceri
conveniet, cum proposita fuerit aequatio quaecunque ipsarum x, y et p. Et cum in his
duabus sectionibus ac potissimum priore a Geometris plurimum sit elaboratum, eae fere
maximam partem totius operis complebunt.
SCHOLION 2
45. Prima autem integrationis principia ex ipso calculo differentiali sunt petenda, perinde
ac principia divisionis ex multiplicatione et principia extractionis radicum ex ratione
evectionis ad potestates sumi solent. Cum igitur, si quantitas differentianda ex pluribus
partibus constet ut P + Q R, eius differentiale sit dP + dQ dR, ita vicissim, si formula
differentialis ex pluribus partibus constet ut Pdx +Qdx Rdx, integrale erit
Pdx + Qdx Rdx

singulis scilicet partibus seorsim integrandis. Deinde cum quantitatis aP differentiale sit
adP, formulae differentialis aPdx integrale erit a Pdx scilicet per quam quantitatem
constantem formula differentialis multiplicatur, per eandem integrale multiplicari debet.

Ita si formula differentialis sit aPdx + bQdx + cRdx, quaecunque functiones ipsius x
litteris P, Q, R designentur, integrale erit
a Pdx + b Qdx + c Rdx ,
ita ut integratio tantum in singulis formulis Pdx, Qdx et Rdx sit instituenda,
hocque facto insuper adiici debet constans arbitraria C, ut integrale completum
obtineatur.
PROBLEMA 1
46. Invenire functionem ipsius x, ut eius differentiale sit = ax n dx , seu
integrare formulam differentialem ax n dx .
SOLUTIO
m
Cum potestatis x differentiale sit mx
mx
m 1
dx , erit vicissim
m 1
dx = m x m 1dx = x m
ideoque
x
fiat m 1 = n seu m = n +1; erit
m 1
dx = 1 x m ;
m
EULER'S
page 70
dx = 1 x n +1 et a x n dx = a x n +1 .
n +1
n +1
Unde formulae differentialis propositae ax n dx integrale completum erit

a x n +1 + C ,
n +1
cuius ratio vel inde patet, quod eius differentiaIe revera fit = ax n dx . Atque
haec integratio semper locum habet, quicunque numerus exponenti n tribuatur,
sive positivus sive negativus, sive integer sive fractus, sive etiam irrationalis.
Unicus casus hinc excipitur, quo est exponens n = 1 seu haec formula integranda
adx proponitur. Verum in calculo differentiali iam ostendimus, si lx denotet logarithmum
x
hyperbolicum ipsius x, fore eius differentiale = dx , unde vicissim concludimus esse
x
adx
= lx et
x
adx
Quare adiecta constante arbitraria erit formulae
x
dx
x
= alx .
integrale completum
= alx + C= lxa+ C,
quod etiam pro C ponendo 1c ita exprimitur: lcxa.
COROLLARIUM 1
47. Formulae ergo differentialis ax n dx integrale semper est algebraicum solo excepto
casu, quo n = 1 et integrale per logarithmos exprimitur, qui ad functiones transcendentes
sunt referendi. Est scilicet
adxx = alx + C = lcx
COROLLARIUM 2
48. Si exponens n numeros positivos denotet, sequentes integrationes
utpote maxime obviae probe sunt tenendae
adx = ax + C, axdx = a2 xx + C , ax dx = a3 x + C,
3
4
4
5
5
6
ax dx = a4 x + C, ax dx = a5 x + C, ax dx = a6 x + C.
2
COROLLARIUM 3
49. Si n sit numerus negativus, posito n = m fit
adx
x
m
= a x1 m + C =
1 m
unde hi casus simpliciores notentur
( m l ) x m 1
+C ,
EULER'S

adx = a + C,
adx = a + C,
adx = a + C,
2 xx
x
3 x3
x2
x3
x4
adx = a + C,
adx = a + C, etc.
4 x4
5 x5
x5
x6
COROLLARIUM 4
50. Quin etiam si n denotet numeros fractos, integralia hinc obtinentur.
Sit primo n = m ; erit
3
adx
x m = 2a x x m + C,
m+2
unde casus notentur
adx x = 23a x x + C, axdx x = 25a x x + C,

3
3
4
axxdx x = 27a x x + C, ax dx x = 29a x x + C.
2
COROLLARIUM 5
51. Ponatur etiam n = m et habebitur

2
adx =
2a
2a
+C =
+C,
m
m
x
2m x
( m 2) xm2
unde hi casus notentur
adxx = 2a
xadxx = 2xa + C , xxadxx = 3x2ax + C ,

xadxx = 5 x2ax + C.
x + C,
COROLLARIUM 6
52. Si in genere ponamus n = , fiet
ax dx = a x
+
+C
seu per radicalia
adx
sin autem ponatur n =
habebitur
x = a x + + C ;
+
page 71
EULER'S
= a x
adx
page 72
+C
seu per radicalia
adxx = a
+C .
SCHOLION 1
53. Quanquam in hoc capite functiones tantum rationales tractare institueram, tamen istae
irrationalitates tam sponte se obtulerunt, ut perinde ac rationales tractari possint.
Caeterum hinc quoque formulae magis complicatae integrari possunt, si pro x functiones
alius cuiuspiam variabilis z statuantur. Veluti si ponamus x = f +gz, erit dx = gdz; quare si
pro a scribamus ag , habebitur
adz ( f + gz )
( n +1) g (
a
f + gz )
n +1
+C ,
casu autem singulari, quo n = 1,

= a l ( f + gz ) + C .
( fadz
+ gz ) g
Tum si sit n = m, fiet
( f adz
+ gz )
( m 1) g ( f + gz )
m 1
+C.
At posito n = prodit
adz ( f + gz ) =
a ( f + gz ) +1 + C ;
( + ) g
posito autem n = obtinetur
( f + gz )
adz
a( f + gz )
( ) g ( f + gz )
+C .
SCHOLION 2
54. Caeterum hic insignis proprietas annotari meretur. Cum hic quaeratur functio y, ut
dy
sit dy = ax n dx , si ponamus dx = p , haec habebitur relatio p = ax n , ex qua functio y

investigari debet. Quoniam igitur est
y = na+1 x n +1 + C ,
EULER'S
page 73
ob ax n = p erit quoque
px
y = n +1 + C
sicque casum habemus, ubi relatio differentialium per aequationem quandam inter x, y et
p proponitur cuique iam novimus satisfieri per aequationem y = na+1 x n +1 + C . Verum

px
haec non ampius erit integrale completum pro relatione in aequatione y = n +1 + C

contenta, sed tantum particulare, quoniam integrale non involvit novam constantem, quae
in relatione differentiali non insit. Integrale autem completum est
y = naD
x n +1 + C
+1
novam constantem D involvens; hinc fit
dy
= aDx n = p
dx
ideoque
px
y= n +1 + C.
Etsi hoc non ad praesens institutum pertinet, tamen notasse iuvabit.
PROBLEMA 2
55. Invenire functionem ipsius x, cuius differentiale sit = Xdx denotante X
functionem quamcunque rationalem integram ipsius x, seu definire integrale
Xdx .
SOLUTIO
Cum X sit functio rationalis integra ipsius x, in hac forma contineatur necesse est
X = + x + x 2 + x3 + x 4 + etc.,
unde per problema praecedens integrale quaesitum est
Xdx = C + x + 12 x
+ 13 x3 + 14 x 4 + 15 x5 + 15 x6 + etc.,
Atque in genere si sit
X = x + x + x + etc.,
erit
Xdx = C + +1 x
+1
+ +1 x +1 + +1 x +1 + etc.,
ubi exponentes , , etc. etiam numeros tam negativos quam fractos significare
possunt, dummodo notetur, si fuerit = 1 , fore
ordinem transcendentium referendus.
xdx = lx , qui est unicus casus ad
EULER'S
page 74
PROBLEMA 3
56. Si X denotet functionem quamcunque rationalem fractam ipsius x, methodum
describere, cuius ope formulae Xdx integrale investigari conveniat.
SOLUTIO
Sit igitur X = M
, ita ut M et N futurae sint functiones integrae ipsius x, ac primo
N
dispiciatur, num summa potestas ipsius x in numeratore M tanta sit vel etiam maior quam
in denominatore N, quo casu ex fractione M
partes integrae per divisionem eliciantur;
N
quarum integratio cum nihil habeat difficultatis, totum negotium reducitur ad eiusmodi
fractionem M
, in cuius numeratore M summa potestas ipsius x minor sit quam in
N
denominatore N.
Tum quaerantur omnes factores ipsius denominatoris N, tam simplices, si fuerint
reales, quam duplices reales, vicem scilicet binorum simplicium imaginariorum gerentes;
simulque videndum est, utrum hi factores omnes sint inaequales necne; pro factorum
enim aequalitate alio modo resolutio fractionis M
in fractiones simplices est instituenda,
N
quandoquidem ex singulis factoribus fractiones partiales nascuntur, quarum aggregatum
fractioni propositae M
aequatur. Scilicet ex factore simplici a + bx nascitur fractio
N
A ;
a + bx
si bini sint aequales seu denominator N factorem habeat (a + bx)2 , hinc nascuntur
fractiones
A
B ;
2 +
a +bx
(a + bx )
ex huiusmodi autem factore (a + bx)3 hae tres fractiones

A
(a + bx )3
B
(a +bx ) 2
+ a +Cbx :
et ita porro.
Factor autem duplex, cuius forma est aa 2abxcos. + bbxx , nisi alius ipsi fuerit
aequalis, dabit fractionem partialem
A+ Bx
;
aa 2 abxcos . + bbxx
si autem denominator N duos huiusmodi factores aequales involvat, inde nascuntur binae
huiusmodi fractiones partiales
A+ Bx
C + Dx
2 +
aa 2abxcos . +bbxx
EULER'S
page 75

3
at si cubus adeo ( aa 2abxcos. + bbxx ) fuerit factor denominatoris N, ex eo oriuntur

huiusmodi tres fractiones partiales
A+ Bx
C + Dx
E + Fx
+ aa 2abx
;
cos. +bbxx
et ita porro.
Cum igitur hoc modo fractio proposita M
in omnes suas fractiones simplices fuerit
N
resoluta, omnes continebuntur in alterutra harum formarum vel
A+ Bx
n
aa
abx
2
cos . + bbxx )
(
A
n vel
a
+
( bx )
ac singulos iam per dx multiplicatos integrari oportet; erit omnium horum integralium
aggregatum valor functionis quaesitae Xdx = Mdx
.
N
COROLLARIUM 1
57. Pro integratione ergo omnium huiusmodi formularum Mdx
totum negotium reducitur
N
ad integrationem huiusmodi binarum formularum
( aAdx
+ bx )
et
( A+ Bx )dx
dum pro n successive scribuntur numeri 1, 2, 3, 4 etc.

COROLLARIUM 2
58. Ac prioris quidem formae integrale iam supra ( 53) est expeditum, unde patet fore
= A l a + bx ) + Const .
aAdx
+ bx b (
= A + Const .
( aAdx
b( a + bx )
+ bx )
2
( aAdx
+ bx )
A
2
2b( a + bx )
+ Const .
et generatim
( aAdx
+bx )
A
n 1
( n 1)b( a +bx )
+ Const .
COROLLARIUM 3
EULER'S
page 76
59. Ad propositum ergo absolvendum nihil aliud superest, nisi ut integratio huius
formulae
( A+ Bx )dx
doceatur, primo quidem casu n = 1, tum vero casibus n = 2, n = 3, n = 4 etc.

SCHOLION 1
60. Nisi vellemus imaginaria evitare, totum negotium ex iam traditis confici posset;
denominatore enim N in omnes suos factores simplices resoluto, sive sint reales sive
imaginarii, fractio proposita semper resolvi poterit in fractiones partiales huius formae
Adx vel huius Adx ; quarum integralia cum sint in promtu, totius formae
n
a + bx
( a +bx )
M dx integrale habetur. Tum autem non parum molestum foret binas partes imaginarias
N
ita coniungere, ut expressio realis resultaret, quod tamen rei natura absolute exigit.
SCHOLION 2
61. Hic utique postulamus resolutionem cuiusque functionis integrae in factores nobis
concedi, etiamsi algebra neutiquam adhuc eo sit perducta, ut haec resolutio actu institui
possit. Hoc autem in Analysi ubique postulari solet, ut, quo longius progrediamur, ea,
quae retro sunt relicta, etiamsi non satis fuerint explorata, tanquam cognita assumamus;
sufficere scilicet hic potest omnes factores per methodum approximationum quantumvis
prope assignari posse. Simili modo cum in calculo integrali longius processerimus,
integralia omnium huiusmodi formularum Xdx, quaecunque functio ipsius x littera X
significetur, tanquam cognita spectabimus plurimumque nobis praestinisse videbimur, si
integralia magis abscondita ad eas formas reducere valuerimus; atque hoc etiam in usu
practico nihil turbat, cum valores talium formularum Xdx quantumvis prope assignare
liceat, uti in sequentibus ostendemus. Caeterum ad has integrationes resolutio

denominatoris N in suos factores absolute est necessaria, propterea quod singuli hi
factores in expressionem integralis ingrediuntur; paucissimi sunt casus iique maxime
obvii, quibus ista resolutione carere possumus; veluti si proponatur haec
n 1
formula x dx
statim patet posito x n = eam abire in
n
1+ x
d
, cuius integrale est
n(1+ )
1 l 1 + = 1 l 1 + x n , ubi resolutione in factores non fuerat opus. Verum huiusmodi

) n
n (
casus per se tam sunt perspicui, ut eorum tractatio nulla peculiari explicatione indigeat.
PROBLEMA 4
62. Invenire integrale huius formulae
( A+ Bx )dx
y = aa 2abxcos. +bbxx
EULER'S
page 77
SOLUTIO
Cum numerator duabus constet partibus Adx+Bxdx, haec posterior B xdx sequenti modi
tolli poterit. Cum sit
2 abdxcos . + 2bbxdx
l ( aa 2abxcos. + bbxx ) =
aa 2 abxcos . +bbxx
multiplicetur haec aequatio per 2Bbb et a proposita auferatur; sic enim prodibit
y B l ( aa 2abxcos.
2bb
+ bbxx ) =
( A+
Bacos .
b
)dx
aa 2abxcos. +bbxx
ita ut haec tantum formula integranda supersit. Ponatur brevitatis gratia formula
Bacos .
=C
b
A+
ut habeatur haec
aa 2abxCdx
cos . + bbxx
quae ita exhiberi potest
aa sin . +Cdx
( bx acos. )
2
Statuatur bx acos. = av sin . hincque dx = adv bsin. unde formula nostra erit
Cadv sin . :b
C
dv
aa sin . (1+vv ) = ab sin
. (1+ vv ) .
2
Ex calculo autem differentiali novimus esse
(1+dvvv ) = Arc.tang.v = Arc.tang.
bx a cos .
,
a sin .
unde ob
C=
erit nostrum integrale
Ab + Ba cos .
b
Ab + Ba cos .
bx a cos .
Arc.tang. a sin .
abb sin .
EULER'S
page 78
Quocirca formulae propositae
( A+ Bx )dx
aa2abxcos. +bbxx
integrale est
B l aa 2abxcos.
2bb (
Ab + Ba cos .
+ bbxx ) + abb sin .
bx a cos .
Arc.tang. a sin .
quod ut fiat completum, constans arbitraria C insuper addatur.

COROLLARIUM 1
bx a cos .
cos .
63. Si ad Arc.tang. a sin . addamus Arc.tang. sin . , quippe qui in constante addenda
bx sin .
contentus concipiatur, prodibit Arc.tang. a bx cos . sicque habebimus
( A+ Bx )dx
aa 2abxcos. +bbxx
Ab + Ba cos .
bx sin .
= 2Bbb l ( aa 2abxcos. + bbxx ) + abb sin . Arc.tang. a bx cos .
adiecta constante C.
COROLLARIUM 2
64. Si velimus, ut integrale hoc evanescat posito x = 0, constans C sumi debet
B laa sicque fiet
= 2bb
( A+ Bx )dx
aa2abxcos. +bbxx
Bl
= bb
a
Ab + Ba cos .
+ abb sin .
bx sin .
Pendet ergo hoc integrale partim a logarithmis, partim ab arcubus circularibus seu
angulis.
COROLLARIUM 3
65. Si littera B evanescat, pars a logarithmis pendens evanescit fitque
bx sin .
= A Arc.tang. a bx cos . + C
aa2abxAdx
cos . + bbxx ab sin .
sicque per solum angulum definitur.
EULER'S
page 79
COROLLARIUM 4
66. Si angulus sit rectus ideoque cos . = 0 et sin . = 1 , habebitur
( A+ Bx )dx
aa +bbxx
Bl
= bb
( aa +bbxx )
a
A Arc.tang. bx + C ;
+ ab
a
si angulus sit 60 ideoque cos. = 12 et sin . = 23 , erit
( A+ Bx )dx
aaabx+bbxx = bbB l
( aa abx +bbxx )
a
3
+ 2 Ab + Ba Arc.tang. 2bx
a bx
abb 3
At si = 120 ideoque cos. = 12 et sin . = 23 , erit

o
( A+ Bx )dx
aa+ abx+bbxx = bbB l
( aa + abx +bbxx )
a
3
+ 2 Ab Ba Arc.tang. 2bx
a + bx
abb 3
SCHOLION 1
67. Omnino hic notatu dignum evenit, quod casu = 0 , quo denominator
aa 2abx + bbxx fit quadratum, ratio anguli ex integrali discedat. Posito enim angulo
B l a bx et altera pars
infinite parvo erit cos. = 1 et sin . = , unde pars logarithmica fit bb
a
Ab + Ba Arc.tang. bx
abb
a bx
( Ab + Ba ) x
bx
, quia arcus infinite parvi a bx tangens ipsi est aequalis,
ab( a bx )
sicque haec pars fit algebraica. Quocirca erit
( A+ Bx )dx B a bx ( Ab + Ba ) x
= bb l a +
+ Const .,
2
ab( a bx )
( a bx )
cuius veritas ex praecedentibus est manifesta; est enim
( A+ Bx )
B + Ab + Ba
2 =
bx ) b( a bx )2
b
a
(
( a bx )
Iam vero est
B la = B l a bx ,
= B l ( a bx ) bb
b(aBdx
bb
a
bx ) bb
( Ab + Ba )dx Ab + Ba Ab + Ba ( Ab + Ba ) x
=
abb =
,
2
bb( a bx )
ab( a bx )
b( a bx )
siquidem utraque integratio ita determinetur, ut casu x = 0 integralia evanescant.
EULER'S
page 80
SCHOLION 2
68. Simili modo, quo hic usi sumus, si in formula differentiali fracta Mdx
summa
N
potestas ipsius x in numeratore M uno gradu minor sit quam in denominatore N, etiam is
terminus tolli poterit. Sit enim
M = Ax n 1 + Bx n 2 + Cx n 3 + etc.
et
N = x n + x n 1 + x n 2 + etc.
= dy Cum iam sit
ac ponatur Mdx
N
dN = n x n 1dx + ( n 1) dx x n 2 + ( n 2 ) dx x n 3 + etc.
erit
AdN
n N
n 1 ( n 1) A n 2 ( n 2 ) A n 3
= dx
+ n x
+ etc. ,
Ax + n x
N
quo valore inde subtracto remanebit
( n 1) A
( n 2 ) A
dy nAdN
B n x n 2 + C n x n 3 + etc.
= dx
N
N
Quare si brevitatis gratia ponatur
B
obtinebitur
( n 1) A
n
= B, C
( n 2 ) A
n
= C, D
( n 3) A
n
= D, etc.,
dx( Bx n2 +Cx n3 + Dx n4 + etc.)

y = nA lN +
= Mdx
.
n
n 1
n2
n 3
N
x + x
+ x
+ x
etc.
Hoc igitur modo omnes formulae differentiales fractae eo reduci possunt, ut

summa potestas ipsius x in numeratore duobus pluribusve gradibus minor sit quam in
denominatore.
PROBLEMA 5
69. Formulam integralem

y=
( A+ Bx )dx
n +1
ad aliam similem reducere, ubi potestas denominatoris sit unogradu inferior.

SOLUTIO
EULER'S
page 81
Sit brevitatis gratia aa 2abxcos. + bbxx = X ac ponatur
Cum ob
( A+ Bx )dx
X n +1
= y.
dX = 2abdxcos. + 2bbdxx
sit
n( C + Dx ) dX Ddx
+ n
X n +1
X
d . C + Dx
=
n
X
ideoque
C + Dx
Xn
habebimus
y + C + Dx
=
n
X
2nb( C + Dx )( a cos . bx ) dx
X n +1
+ Ddx
n ,
dx( A+ 2 nCab cos . + x( B + 2nDab cos . 2nCbb ) 2 nDbbxx )

X n+1
+ Ddx
n .
Iam in formula priori litterae C et D ita definiantur, ut numerator per X fiat divisibilis;
oportet ergo sit = 2nDXdx , unde nanciscimur
A + 2nCab cos . = 2nDaa

et
B + 2nDab cos . 2nCbb = 4nDab cos .
seu B 2nCbb = 2nDabcos. hincque

2nCbb ;
2nDa = Bbcos
.
at ex priori conditione est

2nDa =
A 2nCab cos .
a
quibus aequatis fit
Ba + Abcos. 2nCabbsin 2 . = 0
seu
C=
Ba + Abcos .
2 nabbsin 2 .
unde
B 2nCbb =
Ba sin .2 Ba Ab cos .
a sin .2
ita ut reperiatur
D=
Sumtis ergo litteris
C=
Ab cos . Ba cos .2
,
a sin .2
Ab Ba cos .
.
2naab sin .2
Ba + Ab cos .
et
2nabb sin 2 .
D=
Ab Ba cos .
2naab sin 2 .
EULER'S
page 82
erit
dx
y + C + Dx
= 2nDdx
+ Ddx
n
n
n = ( 2 n 1) D
n
ideoque
sive
( A+ Bx )dx
X n +1
( A+ Bx )dx
X
= C nDx ( 2n 1) D dxn ,
n +1
Baa Aab cos . + ( Abb + Bab cos . ) x

2 naabb sin .2 X n
( 2n 1)( Ab + Ba cos . )
2 naab sin .2
Xdx .
n
( A+ Bx )dx
Quare, si formula dxn constet, etiam integrale hoc
assignari
n +1
poterit.
COROLLARIUM 1
70. Cum igitur manente X = aa 2abx cos . + bbxx sit
dxX
erit
( A+ Bx )dx
X2
bx sin .
1
= absin
Arc.tang . a bx cos . + Const .,
.
=
+
Baa Aab cos . +( Abb + Bab cos . ) x

2 aabb sin .2 X
Ab + Ba cos .
2 na 3bb sin .3
bx sin .
Arc.tang. a bx cos . + Const .
Ideoque posito B = 0 et A = 1 fiet

a cos . +bx
bx sin .
Xdx = 2aab sin . X + 2a b 1sin . Arc.tang. a bx cos . + Const .

2
Integrale ergo
( A+ Bx )dx
X2
logarithmos non involvit.
COROLLARIUM 2
71. Hinc ergo cum sit
a cos . +bx
Xdx = 4aab sin . X

3
erit ilIum valorem substituendo
3
4 aa sin .2
Xdx + Const .,
2
EULER'S

bx sin .
13
dx = a cos . + bx + 3( a cos . +bx ) +
3
2
2
4
4
5
5
4 aab sin . X
24 a b sin . X 24 a b sin .
X
page 83
hincque porro concluditur

a cos . +bx
Xdx = 6aab sin . X

4
5( a cos . +bx )
46 a b sin . X
4
135
246 a 7b sin .7
3( a cos . +bx )
246 a 6b sin .6 X
bx sin .
Arc.tang . a bx cos .
COROLLARIUM 3
72. Sic ulterius progrediendo omnium huiusmodi formularum integralia obtinebuntur
dxX , Xdx , Xdx , Xdx

2
etc.,
quorum primum arcu circulari solo exprimitur, reliqua vero praeterea partes
algebraicas continent.
SCHOLION
73. Sufficit autem integralia
Xdx
n +1
nosse, quia formula
( A+ Bx )dx
X n +1
facile eo reducitur; ita
enim repraesentari potest

1
2bb
2Abbdx + 2 Bbbxdx 2 Babdxcos . + 2 Babdxcos .

X n +1
quae ob 2bbxdx 2abdxcos. = dX abit in hanc

1
2bb
BdX
X n +1
+ 21b
( Ab + Ba )cos. dx
X n +1
At
XdX
n +1
unde habebitur
( A+ Bx )dx
X n +1
unde tantum opus est nosse integralia
= 1n ,
B
2nbbX n
XdX
n +1
nX
Ab + Bacos .
b
Xdx
n +1
, quae modo exhibuimus. Atque haec sunt
dx integrandas,
omnia subsidia, quibus indigemus ad omnes formulas fractas M
N
Dummodo M et N sint functiones integrae ipsius x. Quocirca in genere integratio omnium

huiusmodi formularum Vdx , ubi V est functio rationalis ipsius x quaecunque, est in
EULER'S
page 84
potestate; de quibus notandum est, nisi integralia fuerint algebraica, semper vel per
logarithmos vel angulos exhibeti posse. Nihil aliud igitur superest, nisi ut hanc
methodum aliquot exemplis illustremus.
EXEMPLUM 1
74. Proposita formula differentiali
(A+ Bx )dx
+ x + xx
definire eius integrale.
Cum in numeratore variabilis x pauciores habeat dimensiones quam in denominatore,

haec fractio nullas partes integras complectitur. Hinc denominatoris indoles perpendatur,
utrum habeat duos factores simplices reales necne, ac priori casu, num factores sint
aequales; ex quo tres habebimus casus evolvendos.
1. Habeat denominator ambos factores aequales sitque = (a + bx)2 et
fractio
(A+ Bx )dx
(a +bx ) 2
resolvitur in has duas

Ab Ba
b (a + bx ) 2
+ b(aB+bx ) ,
unde fit
(A+ Bx )dx
(a +bx )2
= bbBa(a+Ab
+ B l (a + bx)+Const. ;
bx ) bb
si integrale ita determinetur, ut evanescat posito x = 0, reperitur
(A+ Bx )dx ( Ab Ba ) x B a + bx
= ab(a +bx ) + bb l a .
(a + bx ) 2
II. Habeat denominator duos factores inaequales sitque proposita haec

A+ Bx
formula (a +bx
dx et haec fractio resolvitur in has partiales
)(f + gx )
Ab Ba dx + Ag Bf dx ,
bf -ag a +bx
ag-bf
f + gx
unde obtinetur integrale quaesitum
( A+ Bx )dx
Ag Bf
f + gx
f
Ag Bf
g (ag-bf )
= m n,
Ba l a + bx +
l
(a +bx)(f + gx) = bAb
(bf -ag )
a
g (ag-bf )
Ponatur
Ab Ba
b (bf -ag )
= m + n et
ut integrale fiat
ml
( a +bx )( f + gx )
af
+ nl
f ( a + bx )
a ( f + gx )
+ Const .
EULER'S
page 85
erit
2m =
erit ergo
B ( bf ag )
bg ( bf ag )
( A+ Bx )dx
(a +bx)(f + gx) = 2Bbg l
B
= bg
et 2n =
( a +bx )( f + gx )
af
2 Abg Bag Bbf

bg ( bf ag )
2 Abg B ( ag +bf ) f ( a + bx )
l
.
2bg (bf -ag )
a ( f + gx )
III. Sint denominatoris factores simplices ambo imaginarii, quo casu formam habebit
aa 2abxcos. + bbxx ; qui casus cum supra [ 64] iam sit tractatus, erit
( A+ Bx )dx
aa2abxcos. +bbxx
Bl
= bb
75. Casu secundo, quo f = a et
Ab + Ba cos .
+ abb sin .
bx sin .
COROLLARIUM 1
g = b , erit
( A+ Bx )dx
aa bbxx
B l aa bbxx + A l a +bx
= 2bb
2 ab a bx
aa
hinc seorsim sequitur
= A l a +bx + C
aaAdx
bbxx 2 ab a bx
et
bbxx = B l
= B l aa aa
aaBxdx
bb
bbxx 2bb
a
( aa bbxx )
+ C.
COROLLARIUM 2
76. Casu tertio, si ponamus cos. = 0 , habemus
( A+ Bx )dx
aa +bbxx
Bl
= bb
( aa +bbxx )
a
A Arc.tang. bx + c
+ ab
a
hincque singillatim
= A Arc.tang. bx
+c
aaAdx
+ bbxx ab
a
et
= Bl
aaBxdx
+bbxx bb
( aa +bbxx )
a
EXEMPLUM 2
+c
EULER'S
page 86
m 1
, siquidem exponens m 1 minor sit quam n,
77. Proposita formula differentiali x dx
1+ x n
integrale definire.
In capite ultimo Institutionum Calculi Differentialis [L. EULERI Institutiones calculus
differentialis cum eius usu in analysi finitorum ac doctrina serierum, Petropoli 1755]
m 1
resolvitur, sumto pro
invenimus fractiones simplices, in quas haec fractio x dx
n
1+ x
mensura duorum angulorum rectorum in hac forma generali contineri

2 sin .(
2 k 1)
n
sin .(
2 k 1)
n
2 cos .
n 1 2 x cos .
( x cos .(
)
+ xx )
m( 2 k 1)
n
2 k 1)
n
( 2 k 1
n
),
ubi pro k successive omnes nnmeros 1, 2, 3 etc. substitui convenit, quoad 2k - 1 numerum
n superare incipiat. Hac ergo forma in dx ducta et cum generali nostra
( A+ Bx )dx
aa 2 abxcos . +bbxx
comparata fit
a = 1, b = 1, =
et
seu
( 2k 1)
n
( 2k 1) sin . m ( 2k 1) + 2 cos . ( 2k 1) cos . m ( 2k 1)

A = n2 sin .
n
n
n
n
n
( m 1)( 2k 1)
A = n2 cos .
n
B = n2 cos .
unde fit
Ab + Ba cos . = n2 sin .
ac propterea huius partis integrale erit
et
m ( 2k 1)
,
n
( 2k 1) sin . m ( 2k 1)
n
EULER'S
page 87
n2 cos .
m ( 2k 1)
( 2k 1) + xx
l 1 2 x cos .
n
n
( 2k 1)
x sin .
m ( 2k 1)
n
.
+ n2 sin .
Arc.tang.
n
( 2k 1)
1 x cos .
Ac si n sit numerus impar, praeterea accedit fractio dx
n(1+ x )
, cuius integraIe
est 1n l (1 + x) , ubi signum superius valet, si m impar, inferius vero, si m par. Quocirca
integrale quaesitum
x1+ xdx
m 1
x sin .
n2 cos . m l
n
sequenti modo exprimetur
n
1 2 x cos . + xx + n2 sin . m Arc.tang.
n
n
1 x cos .
n2 cos . 3m l
n
n2 cos . 5m l
n
n2 cos . 7 m
n
x sin .3
n
n
n
1 x cos .3
n
x sin .5
n
n
n
1 x cos .5
n
x sin .7
n
1 2 x cos . 7 + xx + n2 sin . 7 m Arc.tang.
n
n
1 x cos .7
n
etc.
secundum numeros impares ipso n minores; sicque totum obtinetur integrale, si n fuerit
numerus par, sin autem n sit numerus impar, insuper accedit haec pars 1n l (1 + x) , prout
m sit numerus vel impar vel par; unde si m = 1, accedit insuper + 1n l (1 + x) .

COROLLARIUM 1
78. Sumamus m = 1, ut habeatur forma dx n , et pro variis casibus
1+ x
ipsius n adipiscimur
EULER'S
page 88
I. 1dx
= l (1 + x )
+x
II. dx = Arc.tang.x
1+ x
III. dx = 23 cos . 3 l (1 2 x cos . 3 + xx )
1+ x
2
IV.
V.
dx
1+ x 4
dx
1+ x 5
x sin . 3
1 x cos . 3
(
)
24 cos . 34 l (1 2 x cos . 34 + xx )
= 24 cos . 4 l
1 2 x cos . 4 + xx
+ 13 l (1 + x )
x sin . 4
1 x cos . 4
x sin . 34
1 x cos . 34

x sin .
1 x cos .
= 52 cos . 5 l
3
5
3
5
VI.
dx
1+ x 6
(
)
62 cos . 36 l (1 2 x cos . 35 + xx )
62 cos . 56 l (1 2 x cos . 55 + xx )
= 62 cos . 6 l
1 2 x cos . 6 + xx
+ 15 l (1 + x )
x sin . 6
1 x cos . 6
x sin . 36
1 x cos . 36
x sin . 56
1 x cos . 56
COROLLARIUM 2
79. Loco sinuum et cosinuum valores, ubi commode fieri potest, substituendo
obtinemus
1+dxx
= 13 l
(1 x + xx ) +
1 Arc.tang . x 3
2 x
3
+ 13 l (1 + x )
seu
1+dxx
= 13 l
1+ x
(1 x + xx )
+ 1 Arc.tang . x2 3x
3
Deinde ob sin . 4 = cos . 4 = 1 = sin . 34 = cos . 34 fit

2
tum vero
dx
1+ x 4
=+ 1 l
2 2
(1+ x
(1 x
)
2 + xx )
2 + xx
+ 1 Arc.tang.1x xx2 ,
2 2
EULER'S
page 89
=+ 1 l
dx
1+ x 6
2 3
(1+ x
(1 x
)
3 + xx )
3 + xx
+ 16 Arc.tang.
3 x(1 xx )
1 4 xx + x 4
EXEMPLUM 3
x m1dx , siquidem exponens m 1

1+ x n
sit minor quam n,
eius integrale definire.

m 1
Functionis fractae x n pars ex factore quocunque oriunda hac forma continetur
1+ x
2 sin . 2 kn sin . 2 mkn 2 cos . 2 mkn ( x cos . 2 kn )

n(1 2 x cos . 2 kn + xx )
( A+ Bx )dx
quae cum forma nostra aa 2abxcos. +bbxx comparata dat

a = 1, b = 1, = 2kn ,
A = n2 sin . 2k sin . 2mk + n2 cos . 2k cos . 2mk , B = n2 cos . 2mk
n
n
n
n
n
hincque
Ab + Ba cos . = n2 sin . 2k sin . 2mk .

n
n
Ex quo integrale hinc oriundum erit
n2 cos . 2mk l
n
x sin . 2 k
n ,
1 2 x cos . 2k + xx + n2 sin . 2mk Arc.tang.
2
n
n
1 x cos . k
n
ubi pro k successive omnes numeri 1, 2, 3 etc. substitui debent, quamdiu 2k

minor est quam n. Accedunt insuper hae ex fractione n(11 x) et, si n est
numerus par, ex fractione n(1+1x ) oriundae integralis partes 1n l (1 x ) et 1n l (1 + x ) ,
ubi signum superius valet, si m est par, inferius vero, si m impar.
Quocirca integrale
x1+ xdx hoc modo exprimitur

m 1
EULER'S
page 90
1n l (1 x )
x sin . 2
n2 cos . 2m l
n
n2 cos . 4m l
n
(1 2x cos . 4n + xx ) +
2 sin . 4m
n
n
n2 cos . 6m l
n
(1 2x cos . 6n + xx ) +
2 sin . 6m
n
n
n
1 2 x cos . + xx + n2 sin . 2m Arc.tang.
n
n
1 x cos . 2
n
x sin . 4
n
Arc.tang.
1 x cos . 4
n
x sin .6
n
Arc.tang.
1 x cos .6
n
etc.
COROLLARIUM
81. Sit m = 1 et pro n successive numeri 1, 2, 3 etc. substituantur, ut nanciscamur
sequentes integrationes
I. 1dx
= l (1 x )
x
(1+ x )
II. 1dxxx = 12 l (1 x ) + 12 l (1 + x ) = 12 l
(1 x )
III.
1dxx
= 13 l (1 x ) 23 cos . 23 l
(1 2 x cos . 23 + xx )
IV.
dx
1 x 4
= 14 l (1 x ) 24 cos . 24 l
x sin . 23
1 x cos . 23
(1 2 x cos . 24 + xx )
x sin . 24
1 x cos . 24
+ 24 l (1 + x )
V.
dx
1 x5
52 cos . 45 l
VI.
dx
1 x 6

2
5
2
5
= 15 l (1 x ) 52 cos . 25 l
4
5
4
5
= 16 l (1 x ) 62 cos . 26 l
62 cos . 46 l
+ 16 l (1 + x )
1 2 x cos . 26 + xx
(1 2 x cos . 45 + xx )
x sin . 46
1 x cos . 46
x sin . 26
1 x cos . 26
EULER'S
page 91
EXEMPLUM 4
(x
m 1
+ x n m1 dx
1+ x
existente n > m 1 eius integrale
definire.
Ex exemplo 2 patet integralis partem quamcunque In genere esse, sumto i pro numero
quocunque impare non maiore quam n,
n2 cos . im l
n
n2 cos .
x sin .i
n ,
1 2 x cos . i + xx + n2 sin . im Arc.tang.
n
n
1 x cos .i
i ( n m )
l
n
1 2 x cos . i + xx + n2 sin .
n
Verum est
cos .
x sin .i
i ( n m )
n .
Arc.tang.
n
1 x cos .i
n
i ( n m )
= cos . i imn = cos . imn
n
et
i ( n m )
= sin . i imn = + sin . imn ,
n
unde partes logarithmicae se destruent, eritque pars integralis In genere
sin .
x sin .i
n .
4 sin . im Arc.tang.
n
n
1 x cos .i
n
Ponatur commoditatis ergo angulus n = eritque
(x
m 1
+ x n m1 dx
1+ x
.
= + n4 sin .m Arc.tang. 1x xsin
cos
.3
cos 3
.5
cos 5
.i
+ n4 sin .im Arc.tang. 1x xsin
cos i
sumto pro i maximo numero impare exponentem n non excedente. Si ipse numerus n sit
impar, pars ex positione i = n oriunda ob sin. mn = 0 evanescet. Notetur ergo hic totum
integrale per meros angulos exprimi.
EULER'S
page 92
COROLLARIUM
83. Simili modo sequens integrale elicitur, ubi soli logarithmi relinquentur,
manente n = :
(x
m 1
x nm1 dx
1+ x
(1 2 x cos . + xx )
= n4 cos .m l
n4 cos .3m l
(1 2 x cos .3 + xx )
n4 cos .5m l
(1 2 x cos .5 + xx )
n4 cos .im l
(1 2 x cos .i + xx ) ,
donec scilicet numerus impar i non superet exponentem n.

EXEMPLUM 5
(x
m 1
x n m1 dx
1+ x
existente n > m 1 eius integrale
definire.
Ex exemplo 3 integralis pars quaecunque concluditur, siquidem brevitatis
gratia n = statuamus,
n2 cos .2mk l
.2mk
(1 2 x cos .2k + xx ) + n2 sin .2mkArc.tang. 1xxsin
cos .2mk
+ n2 cos .2k ( n m ) l
At est
et
.2 mk
(1 2 x cos .2k + xx ) + n2 sin .2k ( n m ) Arc.tang. 1xxsin
cos .2 mk
cos .2k ( n m ) = cos .( 2k 2km ) = cos .2km

sin .2k ( n m ) = sin .( 2k 2km ) = sin .2km ,
unde ista pars generalis abit in

4 sin .2km Arc.tang. x sin .2k ,
n
1 x cos .2m
quare hinc ista integratio colligitur
EULER'S
(x

m 1
n m 1
1+ x
)dx = + 4 sin .2m Arc.tang.

n
page 93
x sin .2
1 x cos 2
.4
cos 4
.6
cos 6
numeris paribus tamdiu ascendendo, quoad exponentem n non superent.

COROLLARIUM
85. Indidem etiam haec integratio absolvitur manente n =
(x
m 1
+ x nm1 dx
1 x
= n2 l (1 x )
n4 cos .2m l
(1 2 x cos .2 + xx )
n4 cos .4m l
(1 2 x cos .4 + xx )
n4 cos .6m l
(1 2 x cos .6 + xx ) ,
ubi etiam numeri pares non ultra terminum n sunt continuandi.

EXEMPLUM 6
86. Proposita formula differentiali dy = 3 dx 4 eius integrale invenire.
x (1+ x ) 1 x
Functio fracta per dx affecta secundum denominatoris factores est

1
2
x3 (1+ x ) (1 x )(1+ xx )
quae in has fractiones simplices resolvitur

dy
1 1 +1
1
9 + 1 + 1+ x = ,
x3 x 2 x 4(1+ x )2 8(1+ x ) 8(1 x ) 4(1+ xx ) dx
unde per integrationem elicitur

y = 1 2 + 1x + lx +
2x
1 9 l 1+ x 1 l 1 x
( ) 8 ( )
4(1+ x ) 8
+ 18 l (1 + xx ) + 14 Arc.tang.x,
quae expressio in hanc formam transmutatur
xx + 1 Arc.tang .x,
y = C + 2+ 2 x +5 xx l 1+xx + 18 l 11+ xx
4
4 xx(1+ x )
SCHOLION
87. Hoc igitur caput ita pertractare licuit, ut nihil amplius in hoc genere desiderari possit.
dy
Quoties ergo eiusmodi functio y ipsius x quaeritur, ut dx aequetur functioni rationali

ipsius x, toties integratio nihil habet difficultatis, nisi forte ad denominatoris singulos
EULER'S
page 94
factores eliciendos Algebrae praecepta non sufficiant; verum tum defectus ipsi Algebrae,
non vero methodo integrandi, quam hic tractamns, est tribuendus. Deinde etiam
dy
potissimum notari convenit semper, cum dx functioni rationali ipsius x aequale ponitur,
functionem y, nisi sit algebraica, alias quantitates transcendentes non involvere praeter
logarithmos et angulos; ubi quidem observandum est hic perpetuo logarithmos
hyperbolicos intelligi oportere, cum ipsius lx differentiale non sit = 1x , nisi logarithmus
hyperbolicus sumatur; at horum reductio ad vulgares est facillima, ita ut hinc applicatio
calculi ad praxin nulli impedimento sit obnoxia. Quare progrediamur ad eos casus,
dy
quibus formula dx functioni irrationali ipsius x aequatur, ubi quidem primo notandum
est, quoties ista functio per idoneam substitutionem ad rationalitatem perduci poterit,
casum ad hoc caput revolvi. Veluti si fuerit
3
dy = 1+ x 3 xx dx,
1+ x
5
evidens est ponendo x = z , unde fit dx = 6 z dz , fore
(1+ z z ) 6 z5dz
3
dy =
1+ zz
ideoque
dy
= 6 z 7 + 6z 6 + 6 z 5 6 z 4 + 6zz 6 + 1+6zz ,
dz
unde integrale
y = 34 z 8 + 76 z 7 + z 6 56 z 5 + 2 z 3 6 z + 6Arc.tang .z
et restituto valore
6
y = 34 x 3 x + 76 x 6 x + x 65 x5 + 2 x 6 6 x + 6Arc.tang .6 x + C.

Part 1 CH 1

Diunggah oleh

Informasi Dokumen

Judul Asli

Hak Cipta

Format Tersedia

Bagikan dokumen Ini

Bagikan atau Tanam Dokumen

Opsi Berbagi

Apakah menurut Anda dokumen ini bermanfaat?

Apakah konten ini tidak pantas?

Hak Cipta:

Format Tersedia

Part 1 CH 1

Diunggah oleh

Hak Cipta:

Format Tersedia

EULER'S

INSTITUTIONUM CALCULI INTEGRALIS VOL. 1

A METHOD FOR FINDING FUNCTIONS OF ONE VARIABLE

Translated and annotated by Ian Bruce.

CONCERNING THE INTEGRATION OF RATIONAL

is equal to a rational function of x, or with such a function put equal

the function sought.

occurs, in which p is equal to some function of x, for example X, so that

function of x only, is to be treated, but in the other it is appropriate to give an account of

Pdx + Qdx Rdx

a Pdx + b Qdx + c Rdx ,

Translated and annotated by Ian Bruce.

on making m 1 = n or m = n +1; there becomes

From which the completed integral of the proposed differential formula is

we can conclude that

adxx = alx + C = lcx

Translated and annotated by Ian Bruce.

from which these simpler cases can be noted :

from which the cases are to be noted :

adx x = 23a x x + C, axdx x = 25a x x + C,

51. Also there can be put n = m and there is had

from which these cases are to be noted :

Translated and annotated by Ian Bruce.

52. If in general we put n =

, then there arises

then there is had

but in the particular case, in which n = 1,

But on putting n = there is produced

Translated and annotated by Ian Bruce.

but on putting n = there is obtained

sought, in order that dy = ax n dx , if we put dx = p , this relation is obtained p = ax n , from

involving a new constant D; hence there becomes

If this is not relevant to the present situation, yet it is helpful to be noted.

from which by the previous problem the integral sought is

And in general if there should be

Translated and annotated by Ian Bruce.

and thus henceforth.

from that there arises the three partial fractions :

and thus henceforth.

reduced to the integration of the two forms of this kind :

while for n there are written successively the numbers 1, 2, 3, 4, etc.

dx can be obtained. But then as

it is at once apparent on putting x n = that it goes into

62. To find the integral of this formula

Translated and annotated by Ian Bruce.

which thus can be expressed thus

But from the differential calculus we know that this becomes

(1+dvvv ) = Arc.tang.v = Arc.tang.

from which on account of

our integral is now

On account of which the integral of the proposed formula

+ bbxx ) + abb sin .

which so that is complete, an arbitrary constant C is added above.

63. If to Arc.tang. a sin .

we add Arc.tang. sin . , which obviously is considered

Translated and annotated by Ian Bruce.

with the constant C added.

But if = 120o and thus cos. = 12 and sin . =

, because the arc of the infinitely small tangent itself is

and there is put Mdx

then there will be

Translated and annotated by Ian Bruce.

with which value then subtracted there remains