,
Montreal, Qubec, H1Z 3V1
tel.: 514-593-5755 or
1-800-625-7577
fax.: 514-593-8338
P4a-MT-103
Rv. 3
PREPARED BY:
Stphane Grimard, Level II
APPROVED BY:
Robert Desautels, Level III
2010-12-15
Page 1 of 67
P4a-MT-103
Rv. 3
2010-12-15
Page 2 of 67
CERTIFICATION STATEMENT
_____________________
Robert Desautels
SNT-TC-1A, Level III
2010-12-15
Date
P4a-MT-103
Rv. 3
_______________________
Robert Desautels
SNT-TC-1A, Level III
2010-12-15
Date
2010-12-15
Page 3 of 67
P4a-MT-103
Rv. 3
2010-12-15
Page 4 of 67
TABLE OF REVISION
DATE
REV.NO.
CHANGE MADE
REVISED/APPROVED BY
2007/12/01
Original
______________________
Robert Desautels Level III
2008-06-27
______________________
Robert Desautels Level III
2010-03-16
General Revision.
______________________
Robert Desautels Level III
2010-12-15
Art.8.7
______________________
Robert Desautels Level III
BUILDINGS
BRIDGES
TRANSMISSION PIPELINES
PRESSURE VESSELS
BOILERS
HEAT EXCHANGERS
FABRICATED PIPE
SHIPS
STORAGE TANKS
MACHINERY
TANK CARS AND TANK TRUCKS
PENSTOCKS, SCROLL CASES
WATER TURBINESGATES AND APPURTENANCES
P4a-MT-103
Rv. 3
2010-12-15
Page 5 of 67
P4a-MT-103
Rv. 3
2010-12-15
Page 6 of 67
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CERTIFICATION STATEMENT .......................................................................................................... 2
DEMONSTRATION STATEMENT ..................................................................................................... 3
TABLE OF REVISION .......................................................................................................................... 4
APPLICATION ....................................................................................................................................... 5
TABLE OF CONTENTS ....................................................................................................................... 6
1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 7
2. SCOPE ........................................................................................................................................... 7
3. REFERENCE DOCUMENTS ...................................................................................................... 7
4. PERSONNEL QUALIFICATIONS .............................................................................................. 8
5. GENERAL ...................................................................................................................................... 8
6. SURFACE PREPARATION AND CLEANING ......................................................................... 9
7. EXAMINATION MEDIUM .......................................................................................................... 10
8. BATH CONCENTRATION AND CONTAMINATION CHECK ............................................. 12
9. PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION................................................................................................ 12
10. METHODS ................................................................................................................................... 13
11. DEMAGNETIZATION ................................................................................................................. 15
12. POST-CLEANING ....................................................................................................................... 15
13. DEFINITION OF INDICATIONS ............................................................................................... 16
14. INTERPRETATION .................................................................................................................... 16
15. EVALUATION OF INDICATIONS ............................................................................................ 16
16. RECORDING OF INDICATIONS ............................................................................................. 16
17. REPORTING................................................................................................................................ 17
18. Annexes ........................................................................................................................................ 18
TABLE OF CONTENT OF SUPPLEMENT ..................................................................................... 22
P4a-MT-103
Rv. 3
1.
2.
2010-12-15
Page 7 of 67
INTRODUCTION
1.1.
1.2.
1.3.
This magnetic particle examination procedure shall be used when ASME Codes
applies or is specified as reference.
SCOPE
2.1.
This magnetic particle examination procedure describes the methods and techniques
to be used whenever magnetic particle examination is specified, to ensure that the
requirements of the applicable Codes, customers specification and other Standards
are fulfiled.
2.2.
3.
REFERENCE DOCUMENTS
This magnetic particle examination procedure is written in accordance with the following
Codes and Standards:
-
ASME SECT. V
ASME SECT. VIII div. 1 app. 6
ASME SECT. VIII div. 2 app. 1
ASME SECT. I
ASME/ANSI B31.1
ASME/ANSI B31.3
API 650
ASTM E 709
ASNT-TC-1A edition 2006
CAN/CGSB-48.9712-2006
P4a-MT-103
Rv. 3
2010-12-15
Page 8 of 67
PROCEDURE QUALIFICATION
When procedure qualification is specified, a change of a requirement in Table T-721
identified as an essential variable from the specified value, or range values, shall
require requalification of the written procedure. A change of a requirement identified as
a nonessential variable from the specified value, or range of values, does not require
requalification of the written procedure. All changes of essential or nonessential
variable from the value, or range of values, specified by the written procedure shall
require revision of, or an addendum to, the written procedure.
4.
5.
PERSONNEL QUALIFICATIONS
4.1.
4.2.
All test reports relating the complete magnetic particles examination and results must
be signed by a qualified technician Level II or Level III.
4.3.
An eyes test shall be performed annually as per art. 8.2 of the written practice P4aSNT-100,rev1
4.4.
The level III is certified as per art. 5.1 of the written practice P4a-SNT-100, rev1 and as
per art UW-54 (a) code ASME section VIII Division 1.
GENERAL
5.1.
The sensitivity of the method is greatest for surface discontinuities and diminishes
rapidly with depth below the surface.
5.2.
One hundred percent (100%) of the surface of the finished welds shall be examined.
Components sections (other than welds) shall be examined as required by the
governing Code section, and/or customer specifications.
5.3.
5.4.
Whichever technique is used to produce the magnetic flux in the part, maximum
sensitivity will be to linear discontinuities oriented perpendicular to the lines of flux. For
optimum effectiveness in detecting all types of discontinuities, each area should be
examined at least twice, with the lines of flux during one examination approximately
perpendicular to the lines of flux during the other.
6.
P4a-MT-103
Rv. 3
2010-12-15
Page 9 of 67
6.2.
Prior to magnetic particle examination, the surfaces to be inspected and adjacent area
(at least one inch on either side) shall be dry and free of all dirt, grease, lint, scale,
welding flux and spatter, oil or other extraneous matter that could interfere with the
examination.
6.3.
Detergent
Organic solvents
Decaling solutions
Paint removers
Vapour degreasing
Sand and grid blasting
Ultrasonic cleaning method
Mechanical or manual brushing
6.4.
If coating is left on the part in the area being examined, it must be demonstrated that
indications can be detected through the existing coating thickness applied. When AC
yoke technique is used on ferretic coated material a procedure shall be written
according to appendix 1 of art. 7 of ASME code Section V.
6.5.
6.6.
If nonmagnetic coatings are left on the part in the area being examined, it shall be
demonstrated that indications can be detected through the existing maximum coating
thickness applied.
7.
P4a-MT-103
Rv. 3
2010-12-15
Page 10 of 67
EXAMINATION MEDIUM
7.1. Dry Particles
7.1.1. The dry particles may be applied on the surface to be examined, by spraying or
dusting from bulb applicators.
7.1.2. Excess of dry particle shall be removed with a light air stream from a bulb or
syringe providing low pressure dry air. The current shall be maintained while
removing the excess of particles.
7.1.3. The colour of the particles shall provide adequate contrast with the background
of the surface being examined
7.1.4. Magnetic particles may be used in the red, black, yellow or gray colours. The
colour given the better contrast shall be chosen.
7.1.5. The powder shall be dry to permit ease of application.
7.1.6. Magnetic particle examination shall not be performed on the parts surface
where temperature exceeds 600F (316C).
P4a-MT-103
Rv. 3
2010-12-15
Page 11 of 67
7.2.6. The temperature of the wet particle suspension and the surface of the part shall
not exceed 135F (57C).
7.2.7. Ardrox 8031 or Magnaflux 7HF particles shall be used in black colour.
7.2.8. Ardrox 8901W or Magnaflux WCP-2 shall be used for white contrast paint.
The examiner shall be in the dark area for at least 5 minutes prior
performing the examination to enable its eyes to adapt to dark viewing.
If the examiner wears glasses or lenses, they shall not be
photosensitive or exhibit any fluorescence.
The black light intensity shall be measured with a black light meter. A
minimum of 1000 W/cm2 shall be required at 15" from the light lens
filter. It shall be measured at least once every 8 hours, and whenever
the work station or the bulb is changed and at the completion of the
examination or a series of examination.
8.
9.
P4a-MT-103
Rv. 3
2010-12-15
Page 12 of 67
The container shall be thoroughly agitated to ensure thorough mixing of all particles in
the solutions.
8.2.
Take a 100ml portion of the suspension in the container to the centrifuge tube.
8.3.
Allow a settling time for approximately 60 min with petroleum distillate suspensions or
30 min with water-based suspensions.
8.4.
8.5.
The concentration shall be as per art. 7.2.2 for non fluorescent particles and as per art.
7.3.2 for fluorescent particles.
8.6.
8.7.
The graduated portion of the tube shall be examined under fluorescent excitation light if
the bath is fluorescent and under visible light (for both fluorescent and nonfluorescent
particles) for striations or bands, differences in color or appearance. Bands or striations
may indicate contamination. If the total volume of the contaminates, including bands or
striations exceeds 30% of the volume magnetic particles, or if the liquid is noticeably
fluorescent, the bath shall be replaced.
8.8.
The contamination check shall be done every time that concentration check is made.
PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION
9.1.
P4a-MT-103
Rv. 3
2010-12-15
Page 13 of 67
10. METHODS
10.1. Yoke method
10.1.1.
This method shall only be applied to detect discontinuities that are open to the
surface of the part.
10.1.2.
10.1.3.
10.1.4.
The examination shall be carried out in two directions on each area; in the
second examination, the line of magnetic flux shall be approximately
perpendicular to those used for the first examination in that area
10.1.5.
Coverage shall be such that the area being examined will ensure 100%
overlap or total coverage at the established test sensitivity.
10.1.6.
The minimum pole spacing shall be 3 inches and the maximum shall be the
pole spacing used for the calibration, but in no case more than 8 inches.
10.1.7.
The calibration of the equipment shall be carried out annually, after major
equipment repairs or whenever equipment has been damaged. If equipment
has not been in use for a year or more, a check shall be done prior to the first
use.
10.1.8.
For the calibration, each alternating current electromagnetic yoke shall have a
lifting power of at least 10 pounds at the maximum pole spacing that will be
used (in no case more than 8 inches).
10.1.9.
The DC Yoke shall have a lifting power of at least 50 pounds at the maximum
pole spacing that will be used (in no case more than 8 inches).
10.1.10. Each weight shall be weighed with a scale from a reputable manufacturer and
stencilled with the applicable nominal weight prior first use. A weight needs
only to be verified against damage in a manner that could have caused
potential loss of material.
10.1.11. Permanent magnet Yoke shall not be used.
NOTE: See technical data MT-01 attached to this procedure.
10.1.12. Yoke technique with fluorescent particles in an undarkened area is not
permitted.
Q:\PROCDURES\TECHNIQUES\E.N.D. (4a)\MT\P4a-MT-103, rev.3.doc
P4a-MT-103
Rv. 3
2010-12-15
Page 14 of 67
P4a-MT-103
Rv. 3
2010-12-15
Page 15 of 67
See Supplement 5.
11. DEMAGNETIZATION
11.1.
When required by the client, or when residual magnetism in the part could interfere
with subsequent processing or usage, the part shall be demagnetized any time after
completion of the examination. Complete demagnetization is required.
12. POST-CLEANING
12.1.
12.2.
When using wet particles, post-cleaning may be done at the customer and the
inspection companys discretion. When post-cleaning is required, it should be
conducted as soon as practical using a process that does not adversely affect the part.
12.3.
Medium shall be removed by wiping with a lint free cloth or absorbent paper repeating
the operation, until most traces of medium have been removed.
P4a-MT-103
Rv. 3
2010-12-15
Page 16 of 67
Valid indication - All valid indications formed by magnetic particle examination are the
results of magnetic leakage field. Indication may be relevant or non relevant.
13.2.
Relevant indications - Relevant indications are produced by leakage fields which are
the result of discontinuities. Relevant indications require evaluation with regards of the
acceptance standard mentioned in art. 15.1 below.
13.3.
Non relevant indications - Non relevant indications can occur as a single or in patterns
as a result of leakage fields created by conditions that requires no evaluation such as
change in section (keyways, drill holes, etc.) inherent material properties, magnetic
writing, etc...
13.4.
False indications - False indications are not the results of magnetic forces. Examples
are; particles held mechanically or by gravity in shallow depressions or particles held
by rust or scale on the surface.
14. INTERPRETATION
14.1.
14.2.
Interpretation shall be carried out to identify the locations of indications and the
character of the indication (see art. 17.1 of this procedure)
15.2.
15.3.
Broad are particle accumulations which could mask indications of discontinuities are
unacceptable, and those areas shall be cleaned and re-examined.
P4a-MT-103
Rv. 3
2010-12-15
Page 17 of 67
16.2. Rejectable indications shall be recorded. As a minimum, the type of indications (linear
or rounded), location and extent (length or diameter or aligned) shall be recorded.
17. REPORTING
17.1.
Note 1: Rejectable and non rejectable indication shall be recorded. As a minimum, the type of
indication (linear or rounded), location and extend (length or diameter or aligned shall
be recorded.
18. Annexes
FIGURE 1
MAGNETIC PARTICLE FIELD INDICATOR
P4a-MT-103
Rv. 3
2010-12-15
Page 18 of 67
P4a-MT-103
Rv. 3
2010-12-15
Page 19 of 67
P4a-MT-103
Rv. 3
2010-12-15
Page 20 of 67
P4a-MT-103
Rv. 3
2010-12-15
Page 21 of 67
P4a-MT-103
Rv. 3
Page 22 of 67
SUPPLEMENT 1
SUPPLEMENT 2
SUPPLEMENT 3
SUPPLEMENT 4
SUPPLEMENT 5
SUPPLEMENT 6
SUPPLEMENT 7
Specimen of Flawtech
2010-12-15
P4a-MT-103
Rv. 3
2010-12-15
Page 23 of 67
SUPPLEMENT 1 (1/2)
ACCEPTANCE STANDARD FOR PRESSURE VESSEL
SECT. VIII DIV. 1 App.6 AND A.P.I. 650. Art 6.2.3
A) Evaluation of indication
An indication is the evidence of a mechanical imperfection. Only indications which have
any dimension greater than 1/16 in. shall be considered relevant.
B)
a)
A linear indication is one having a length greater than three times the width.
b)
c)
Acceptance standards
These acceptance standards shall apply unless other more restrictive standards are
specified for specific materials or applications within this Division.
All surfaces to be examined shall be free of:
a)
b)
c)
d)
C)
P4a-MT-103
Rv. 3
2010-12-15
Page 24 of 67
SUPPLEMENT 1 (2/2)
D)
Examination of areas from which imperfections have been removed. After a defect is
thought being removed and prior to making weld repairs the area shall be examined by
suitable methods to ensure that is has been removed or reduced to an acceptably
sized imperfection.
E)
After repairs have been made, the repaired area shall be blended into the surrounding
surface so as to avoid sharp notches, crevices, or corners and re-examined by the
magnetic particle method and by all other methods of examination that were originally
required for the affected area, except that, when the depth of repair is less than the
radiographic sensitivity required, re-radiography may be omitted.
P4a-MT-103
Rv. 3
2010-12-15
Page 25 of 67
SUPPLEMENT 2 (1/2)
ACCEPTANCE STANDARD FOR POWER PIPING B31.1 art.136.4.3
AND SECTION I art A-260.3
Evaluation of Indications
1)
2)
3)
4)
An indication of a discontinuity may be larger than the discontinuity that caused it;
however, the size of the indication and not the size of the discontinuity is the basis of
acceptance or rejection.
Acceptance standards
The following relevant indications are unacceptable :
a)
b)
c)
d)
P4a-MT-103
Rv. 3
2010-12-15
Page 26 of 67
SUPPLEMENT 2 (2/2)
ACCEPTANCE STANDARD FOR POWER PIPING B31.1
AND SECTION I
Evaluation of Indications
CASTING ACCORDING TO Section I (page 25)
The technique for magnetic particle examination shall be in accordance, with Article 7
of Section V. Imperfections causing magnetic particle indications exceeding degree 1
of Type I, degree 2 off Type II, and degree 3 off Type III, and exceeding degree 1 off
Types IV and V of ASTM E 125, Standard Reference Photographs for Magnetic
Particle Indications on Ferrous Castings, are unacceptable.
P4a-MT-103
Rv. 3
2010-12-15
Page 27 of 67
SUPPLEMENT 3 (1/1)
ACCEPTANCE STANDARDS
ASME SECT. VIII DIV. 2 art 7.5.6.1
Evaluation of indications
d) - Indications will be revealed by retention of magnetic particles. All such indications are not
necessarily imperfections, however, since excessive surface roughness, magnetic
permeability variations (such as at the edge of heat affected zones, etc), may produce similar
indications.
Any indication is the evidence of a mechanical imperfection. Only indications which have any
dimension greater than 1/16 in. shall be considered relevant.
(a)
(b)
(c)
A linear indication is one having a length greater than three times the width.
A rounded indications is one of circular or elliptical shape with a length equal to or
less than three times its width.
Any questionable or doubtful indications shall be re-examined to determine
whether or not they are relevant.
ACCEPTANCE STANDARDS
These acceptance standards shall apply unless other more restrictive standards are specified
for specific materials or applications within Division 2.
All surfaces to be examined shall be free of :
(a)
(b)
(c)
P4a-MT-103
Rv. 3
2010-12-15
Page 28 of 67
P4a-MT-103
Rv. 3
2010-12-15
Page 29 of 67
P4a-MT-103
Rv. 3
2010-12-15
Page 30 of 67
P4a-MT-103
Rv. 3
2010-12-15
Page 31 of 67
P4a-MT-103
Rv. 3
2010-12-15
Page 32 of 67
P4a-MT-103
Rv. 3
2010-12-15
Page 33 of 67
P4a-MT-103
Rv. 3
2010-12-15
Page 34 of 67
P4a-MT-103
Rv. 3
2010-12-15
Page 35 of 67
P4a-MT-103
Rv. 3
2010-12-15
Page 36 of 67
P4a-MT-103
Rv. 3
2010-12-15
Page 37 of 67
P4a-MT-103
Rv. 3
2010-12-15
Page 38 of 67
P4a-MT-103
Rv. 3
2010-12-15
Page 39 of 67
P4a-MT-103
Rv. 3
2010-12-15
Page 40 of 67
P4a-MT-103
Rv. 3
2010-12-15
Page 41 of 67
P4a-MT-103
Rv. 3
2010-12-15
Page 42 of 67
P4a-MT-103
Rv. 3
2010-12-15
Page 43 of 67
P4a-MT-103
Rv. 3
2010-12-15
Page 44 of 67
P4a-MT-103
Rv. 3
2010-12-15
Page 45 of 67
P4a-MT-103
Rv. 3
2010-12-15
Page 46 of 67
P4a-MT-103
Rv. 3
2010-12-15
Page 47 of 67
P4a-MT-103
Rv. 3
2010-12-15
Page 48 of 67
P4a-MT-103
Rv. 3
2010-12-15
Page 49 of 67
P4a-MT-103
Rv. 3
2010-12-15
Page 50 of 67
P4a-MT-103
Rv. 3
2010-12-15
Page 51 of 67
P4a-MT-103
Rv. 3
2010-12-15
Page 52 of 67
P4a-MT-103
Rv. 3
2010-12-15
Page 53 of 67
P4a-MT-103
Rv. 3
2010-12-15
Page 54 of 67
P4a-MT-103
Rv. 3
2010-12-15
Page 55 of 67
P4a-MT-103
Rv. 3
2010-12-15
Page 56 of 67
P4a-MT-103
Rv. 3
2010-12-15
Page 57 of 67
P4a-MT-103
Rv. 3
2010-12-15
Page 58 of 67
P4a-MT-103
Rv. 3
2010-12-15
Page 59 of 67
P4a-MT-103
Rv. 3
2010-12-15
Page 60 of 67
P4a-MT-103
Rv. 3
2010-12-15
Page 61 of 67
P4a-MT-103
Rv. 3
2010-12-15
Page 62 of 67
P4a-MT-103
Rv. 3
2010-12-15
Page 63 of 67
P4a-MT-103
Rv. 3
2010-12-15
Page 64 of 67
P4a-MT-103
Rv. 3
2010-12-15
Page 65 of 67
P4a-MT-103
Rv. 3
2010-12-15
Page 66 of 67
P4a-MT-103
Rv. 3
2010-12-15
Page 67 of 67