AN EXAMINATION OF EMOTIONAL
INTELLIGENCE (EI) FACTORS ON WORKRELATED OUTCOME AMONG
EMPLOYEES OF AUTOMOBILE INDUSTRY
B.Asha
Ph.D. Research Scholar, Bharathiar University & Assistant Professor at
Asan Memorial College of Arts and Science, Chennai, Tamilnadu
Dr. Jayasree Krishnan
Head of the Department MBA,
St. Josephs College of Engineering, Chennai, Tamilnadu
Cite this Article: B.Asha and Dr. Jayasree Krishnan. An Examination of
Emotional Intelligence (EI) Factors on Work-Related Outcome among
Employees of Automobile Industry. International Journal of Management,
7(3), 2016, pp. 293297.
http://www.iaeme.com/IJM/issues.asp?JType=IJM&VType=7&IType=3
1. INTRODUCTION
Organizations today are facing major challenges in terms of competition, innovation,
productivity and work force diversity (Bhaskar, Haritha & Subrahmanyam, 2011). In
these aspects, emotional intelligence of employees would support played a major role
in providing their better work related outcomes. Emotional Intelligence is defined by
peter Salovey and John Mayer as the ability to monitor and regulate ones own and
other feelings, and use feelings to guide thought and action. EI is also defined, as the
ability of a person to manage himself/herself and others. EI addresses the emotional,
personal, Social and survival dimensions of intelligence, which are often more
important for daily functioning than the more cognitive aspects of intelligence (Bar
On, 2002). It includes what they feel about themselves and also about others. It plays
a vital role in decision making. Its being motivated and remaining hopeful and
optimistic when you have setbacks in working toward goals. And its social skill,
getting along well with other people, managing emotions in relationships, being able
to persuade or lead others (Goleman, 1998).
http://www.iaeme.com/IJM/index.asp
293
editor@iaeme.com
2. PROBLEM STATEMENT
The term emotional in emotional intelligence refers to both moods and emotions.
Emotions actually sometimes feed into moods. Emotions are high intensity feelings
triggered a specific stimulus, evoke attention and interrupt cognitive processing or
behaviors (Forgas, 1992; Morris, 1989; Simon, 1982). Outstanding leaders,
executives and managers distinguish themselves by their ability to understand and
manage themselves and to understand and work with others. It is given that technical
and functional expertise is the foundation for effective performance. But Emotional
Intelligence (EI) competencies overwhelmingly distinguish outstanding leaders from
average performers.
Hence, the following are the research questions:
To find out the relationship between Job Satisfaction and Turnover Intension
To find out the difference between Emotional Intelligence and Turnover Intension
4. REVIEW OF LITERATURE
Emotional intelligence brings the two worlds of intellect and emotions together. The
popularity of emotional intelligence has increased greatly in recent years and with that
has come debate (Matthews, Zeidner, & Roberts, 2004). Feelings are seen as
something that inhibits effective decisionmaking and rationality (Albrow, 1992). In
reality feelings are a central role in the leadership process, not an additional factor
to consider (Fineman, 1993; Forgas, 1995). In addition feelings are necessary for
making good decisions in neurological studies (Goleman, 1995). The Western culture
has viewed reason and intellect as opposing forces to supposedly nonrational
phenomena like passion, intuition, feeling and emotions (Matthews, Zeidner, &
Roberts, 2004). The intense emotional reaction could interfere with effective decision
making stating that a reduction in emotion may constitute an equally important
source of irrational behavior (Damasio 1994). Ambivalence in emotional expression
can
deter
an
individual
from
developing
positive
interpersonal
relations. Ambivalence can be expressed by people who want to express their
emotions, agonize over it, and then fail to act (Emmons & Colby, 1995). Others may
express ambivalence by showing their emotion but then regret doing it (King &
Emmons, 1991). Both examples are linked to anxiety, depression, psychiatric
disorders, less social support and lower wellbeing (Emmons & Colby, 1995; Katz &
Campbell, 1994).
6. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Descriptive Research Design was employed for data collection, analysis and
interpretation.
http://www.iaeme.com/IJM/index.asp
294
editor@iaeme.com
SD
Cronbachs alpha
No. of items
Mean
3.91
0.66
0.770
Self-management
10
3.81
0.62
0.809
Social awareness
10
3.70
0.73
0.824
Relationship management
3.75
0.62
0.820
Work environment
11
3.62
0.87
0.763
Job stress
1.99
0.65
0.710
Job satisfaction
3.59
0.87
0.702
Turnover intention
3.53
0.96
0.698
Job performance
3.18
0.86
0.763
http://www.iaeme.com/IJM/index.asp
295
editor@iaeme.com
Below 5
5-10
10-15
Above 15
Mean (SD)
F value
P value
Self-Awareness
3.68 (0.76)
3.96 (0.56)
4.01 (0.63)
4.25 (0.59)
11.973
<0.001**
Self-Management
3.66 (0.66)
3.84 (0.57)
3.84 (0.56)
4.14 (0.62)
7.797
<0.001**
Social Awareness
3.53 (0.81)
3.74 (0.62)
3.70 (0.72)
4.08 (0.72)
6.981
<0.001**
Relationship
Management
Overall Emotional
3.62 (0.66)
3.72 (0.58)
3.83 (0.61)
4.05 (0.56)
6.709
<0.001**
3.62 (0.61)
3.81 (0.42)
3.85 (0.48)
4.13 (0.54)
12.648
<0.001**
Intelligence
Work Environment
3.41 (0.95)
3.61 (0.82)
3.70 (0.83)
4.17 (0.59)
10.202
<0.001**
Job Stress
2.17 (0.57)
1.99 (0.64)
1.95 (0.65)
1.61 (0.71)
9.790
<0.001**
Job Satisfaction
3.37 (0.96)
3.63 (0.80)
3.67 (0.83)
3.95 (0.80)
6.324
<0.001**
Job Performance
3.23 (1.02)
3.61(0.91)
3.57(0.88)
4.09 (0.81)
11.304
<0.001**
Turnover Intention
3.42 (0.78)
3.14 (0.81)
3.16 (0.87)
2.66 (1.04)
10.069
<0.001**
Table shows the difference in salary among the employees based on the levels of
emotional intelligence and job related factors. Further, the mean values specify that
the employees who earn 5 lakhs and below per annum retain a high level of job stress
and turnover intention compared to the employees who earn 5 lakhs and above. It
explicit that job stress and turnover intention will depend on the employees amount
of salary.
Table 5.2 Difference in emotional intelligence and job related factors between the educational
levels of employees
Educational Qualification
Factors of
Emotional Intelligence and its
Impact on Employees
Diploma
UG
PG
F value
P value
Mean (SD)
Self-Awareness
4.12 (0.74)
3.93 (0.57)
3.82 (0.68)
6.245
0.002**
Self-Management
4.04 (0.69)
3.79 (0.56)
3.76 (0.62)
6.423
0.002**
Social Awareness
3.96 (0.80)
3.72 (0.68)
3.60 (0.72)
7.236
<0.001**
Relationship Management
3.94 (0.70)
3.76 (0.56)
3.67 (0.62)
5.522
0.004**
4.01 (0.64)
3.80 (0.44)
3.71(0.53)
9.847
<0.001**
Work Environment
3.75 (0.99)
3.59 (0.88)
3.60 (0.81)
1.072
<0.001**
Job Stress
1.84 (0.80)
1.99 (0.62)
2.06 (0.60)
3.680
0.026*
Job Satisfaction
3.81 (0.98)
3.55 (0.85)
3.55 (0.84)
2.901
0.056
Job Performance
3.64 (1.17)
3.52 (0.93)
3.50 (0.90)
0.627
0.534
Turnover Intention
2.91 (1.10)
3.18(0.83)
3.28(0.78)
5.402
0.005**
**p<0.01, *p<0.05
296
editor@iaeme.com
7. CONCLUSION
In this study, an increased level of emotional intelligence is linked to the higher use of
transformational leadership behavior and proper communication with superior in
Hyundai Dymos India company midmanagers and employees. The findings from this
study indicate that leaders and superiors can develop and strengthen emotional
intelligence and in doing so, can more likely exhibit the use of transformational
leadership behaviors. As a result, if superiors are trained in EI and those skills are
fostered, they will be more likely to utilize transformational leadership, further
resulting in organizational effectiveness and follower satisfaction.
REFERENCES
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
http://www.iaeme.com/IJM/index.asp
297
editor@iaeme.com