In This Issue
Diabetes Mellitus and Tooth Loss
10
11
Educational Objectives
After reading this issue of the Colgate
Oral Care Report and correctly answering the questions in the Continuing
Education Quiz, you will
1. better understand the relationship of
dysglycemia (diabetes and pre-diabetes) to tooth loss, which is another
important oral complication of
diabetes;
2. understand the benefits of participation
in a Dental Practice-Based Research
Network, including increased emphasis
on evidence-based dental care;
3. become familiar with the latest evidence on the clinical benefits and risks
associated with the use of lasers in periodontal therapy;
4. know why dental professionals can play
an important role in the early detection and diagnosis of HIV/AIDS and in
monitoring the outcomes of highly
active anti-retroviral therapy; and
5. better understand the necessity for
stressing to implant patients the importance of regular maintenance visits and
personal oral hygiene to minimize and
manage peri-implant disease.
2
of tooth loss data has emerged.3 In the interval
from 1971 to 2012, for patients with DM, tooth
loss decreased from an average of 11.2 teeth
to 6.6 teeth (p < 0.001), and for persons without DM, from an average of 9.4 teeth to 3.4
teeth (p < 0.001; see Figure 1). In 2012, the
percent of persons with a functional dentition
was 68.8% for those with DM and 86.6% for
those without DM (at least 21 teeth), versus
38.6% and 52.3%, respectively, in 1971
(p < 0.001; see Figure 2).3 Differences between
ethnic/racial groups were also observed. NonHispanic blacks with DM were found to be at
increased risk for tooth loss compared to
Mexican-Americans or non-Hispanic whites
with DM (p < 0.001), and had a lower percent
of patients with a functional dentition.3
n 1971
n 2012
11.2
9.4
6.6
3.4
with DM
without DM
n 1971
n 2012
68.8%
86.6%
52.3%
38.6%
with DM
without DM
A French study on subjects with and without DM also found significant differences in
rates of tooth loss.10 The overall prevalence
of tooth loss was 1.88 times greater for sub-
DM and Pre-Diabetes:
Identifiers in the Dental Office
Study 1 participants
4 missing teeth and 26% teeth with
a deep pocket
Accurate 73% of time
Above plus HbA1c test
Accurate 92% of time (n = 535)
Study participants
4 missing teeth and 26% teeth with
a deep pocket
Accurate 72% of time
Above plus HbA1c test
Accurate 87% of time (n = 591)
Figure 3. DM and pre-diabetes: identifiers in the dental office.
Conclusions
Increased awareness and education is
required at the public health level to contain
the rapidly increasing number of patients with
DM and pre-diabetes. All healthcare personnel should encourage a healthy lifestyle, screening when indicated, and appropriate medical care. Efforts should also include increasing awareness of the oral complications associated with DM and promoting dental visits
for oral health care. Findings that periodontal status and tooth loss may help identify persons with dysglycemia are encouraging and
could result in earlier diagnosis and referral
for medical assessment and care.
3
In conclusion, increased collaboration
across healthcare disciplines is required to
C
identify and treat patients with DM. O
References
Lalla E, Papapanou PN. Diabetes mellitus
and periodontitis: A tale of two common
interrelated diseases. Nat Rev Endocrinol
2011;7(12):738-48.
2. Chapple IL, Genco R, Working Group 2 of
the Joint EFP/AAP Workshop. Diabetes and
periodontal diseases. Consensus report of
the Joint EFP/AAP Workshop on periodontitis and systemic diseases. J Periodontol
2013;84(4):S106-12.
3. Luo H, Pan W, Sloan F, Feinglos M, Wu B.
Forty-year trends in tooth loss among
American adults with and without diabetes
mellitus: An age-period-cohort analysis. Prev
Chronic Dis 2015;12:E211.
4. Preshaw PM, Alba AL, Herrera D, Jepsen
S, Konstantinidis A, Makrilakis K, Taylor R.
Periodontitis and diabetes: a two-way relationship. Diabetologia 2012;55:21-31.
5. Taylor JJ, Preshaw PM, Lalla E. A review of
the evidence for pathogenic mechanisms
that may link periodontitis and diabetes. J
Periodontol 2013;84(4 Suppl):113-34.
6. Lamster IB, Cheng B, Burkett S, Lalla E.
Periodontal findings in individuals with
newly identified pre-diabetes or diabetes
mellitus. J Clin Periodontol 2014;41(11):
1055-60.
7. Furuta M, Liu A, Shinagawa T, Takeuchi
K, Takeshita T, Shimazaki Y, Yamashita Y.
Tooth loss and metabolic syndrome in middle-aged Japanese adults. J Clin Periodontol
2016 Feb 4. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12523. [Epub
ahead of print]
8. Kapp JM, Boren SA, Yun S, LeMaster J.
Diabetes and tooth loss in a national sample of dentate adults reporting annual dental visits. Prev Chronic Dis 2007;4(3):A59.
9. Patel MH, Kumar JV, Moss ME. Diabetes
and tooth loss: an analysis of data from the
National Health and Nutrition Examination
Survey, 2003-2004. J Am Dent Assoc
2013;144(5):478-85.
10. Mayard-Pons ML, Rilliard F, Libersa JC,
Musset AM, Farge P. Database analysis of a
11.
1.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
CLINICAL PRACTICE
Dental Practice-Based Research Networks
Clinical studies evaluating or comparing treatments have often been conducted
in controlled university settings, and are sometimes criticized as not representing the conditions encountered in clinical practice. As a
result, medical and dental practice-based
research networks have been developed that
combine data from a large number of private
practices, each following a defined protocol,
and allow for the variances that occur in the
provision of care in the community. Dental
practice-based research networks (DPBRNs)
have generated data on clinical questions and
reports are now being published. In particular, information regarding different approaches to the management of dental caries and
endodontic lesions is being generated.1-7 This
information provides insight into current practices and challenges, and suggests future clinical approaches.
ent DPBRN regions, proposed to be associated with differences in training and local norms.
Adjunctive diagnostics were rarely used.1
16%
6%
Occlusal with
enamel caries
Proximal with
enamel caries
Outcomes of Involvement
in a DPBRN
Treatment differences based on the
degree of involvement of clinicians within a
DPBRN have been observed. The management
of dental caries was investigated in one study
spanning 2005 through 2011 and involving
17 clinic sites; increasing involvement lead to
significantly decreased restoration rates.11 Over
the six-year period, restoration rates for dental caries lesions dropped from 79.5% to 47.6%
overall (p < 0.01). Between 2005 and 2008,
the reduction in restoration rates by dentists
who were highly involved in the DPBRN was
approximately double the reductions of less
involved dentists (see Figure 3). It was also
found that attendance at meetings was associated with reductions in the number of restorations placed by individual dentists, and that
over time an additional effect was noted, whereby less engaged dentists within the DPBRN
also changed treatment behaviors.11
n 2005
n 2008
88%
82%
12%
73%
5%
63%
n
n
n
n
High Involvement
Low Involvement
Conclusions
Although DPBRN studies involve nonrandom selection of clinicians, they have more
commonalities with general practice than university settings. Research studies within
DPBRNs, as discussed in this article, provide
insights on treatment differences in a reallife setting. Participating in a DPBRN offers
opportunities for involvement in research
which in itself increases the practice of evidence-based care, and over time less engaged
practitioners in the same DPBRN setting also
make care decisions based on evidence. This
research can then be used to determine strategies to promote the use of evidence-based care
by dental professionals, leading to improved
clinical outcomes. O
C
References
1.
TECHNOLOGY
Use of Lasers for Periodontal Treatment
Laser is an acronym for light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation,
and is a technology that utilizes light emitted
coherently, resulting in an intensely focused
beam that can be used to accomplish a range
of tasks. The application of lasers in surgery
has generated a great deal of interest in many
healthcare disciplines. In dentistry, the use
of lasers for periodontal therapy has been of
particular interest, however results regarding efficacy are mixed. There is some evidence
that lasers can be an effective adjunct when
used as part of nonsurgical periodontal therapy, while the data regarding use of lasers during periodontal surgery does not support the
use of these devices. This area of research suffers from a paucity of well-controlled clinical
trials.
Evidence for Benefit of Adjunctive Use of Lasers with Traditional Periodontal Debridement9
Type
#
Studies
Total
Participants
10
306
Diode (non-PDT)
Erbium
Nd:YAG
4
3
3
98
82
82
Evidence
of Benefit
Some benefit, unclear if benefit
outweighs potential harm
Insufficient
Insufficient
Insufficient
Adapted from: ADA Center for Evidence-Based Dentistry. Systematic review and meta-analysis on the nonsurgical
treatment of chronic periodontitis by scaling and root planing with or without adjuncts. July 2015.
Conclusions
Based on the available data, laser therapy may offer some benefits when used adjunctively with nonsurgical periodontal therapy;
specifically, a benefit has been attributed to
the use of diode and Nd:YAG lasers. No statistically significant differences in clinical outcomes have been observed with use of a laser
as a monotherapy or as an adjunct for surgical periodontal therapy. Nonetheless, laser
use can reduce inflammation and post-operative discomfort, and the ability of lasers to
provide relief from dentinal hypersensitivity
is advantageous. The challenging nature of
comparisons of existing studies is a recurring
theme, as many studies involve only a few subjects and demonstrate a great deal of variation in study design and subjects, the types
of lasers used, and the parameters under which
they are used.16
In conclusion, there is still a need for welldesigned, long-term, randomized controlled
clinical trials with large numbers of subjects
to obtain conclusive evidence on the clinical
benefits and risks associated with the use of
lasers in periodontal therapy. O
C
References
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
9
9.
10.
11.
References
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Conclusions
The oral manifestations of HIV/AIDS differ in HAART and non-HAART patients. It is
important for dental professionals to recognize these differences and the associated oral
manifestations. By detecting these oral manifestations, dental professionals can play an
important role in the early detection and diagnosis of HIV/AIDS, and in monitoring the outcomes of HAART. This in turn leads to earlier intervention, reduced morbidity and mortality, and reduced risk of transmission. O
C
12.
7.
8.
Greenspan JS. Sentinels and signposts: the epidemiology and significance of the oral manifestations of HIV disease. Oral Dis 1997;3(1
Suppl):13-7.
Lamster IB, Grbic JT, Bucklan RS, Mitchell-Lewis
D, Reynolds HS, Zambon JJ. Epidemiology and
diagnosis of HIV-associated periodontal diseases.
Oral Dis 1997;3(1 Suppl):141-8.
Reznik DA. Oral manifestations of HIV disease.
Perspective December 2005/January 2006;
13(5):143-8.
Dos Santos Pinheiro R, Frana TT, Ribeiro CMB,
Leo JC, De Souza IPR, Castro GF. Oral manifestations in human immunodeficiency virus
infected children in highly active antiretroviral
therapy era. J Oral Path & Med 2009;38:613-22.
Pongsiriwet S, Iamaroon A, Kanjanavanit S,
Pattanaporn K, Krisanaprakornkit S. Oral lesions
and dental caries status in perinatally HIV-infected children in Northern Thailand. Int J Paediatr
Dent 2003;13(3):180-5.
Meless D, Ba B, Faye M, Diby JS, Nzor S, Datt
S, Diecket L, NDiaye C, Aka EA, Kouakou K,
Ba A, Ekouvi DK, Dabis F, Shiboski C, Arriv
E. Oral lesions among HIV-infected children
on antiretroviral treatment in West Africa. Trop
Med Int Health 2014;19:246-55.
Schmidt-Westhausen AM, Priepke F, Bergmann
FJ, Reichart PA. Decline in the rate of oral opportunistic infections following introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy. J Oral Pathol Med
2000;29(7):336-41.
Patton LL, Ramirez-Amador V, Anaya-Saavedra
G, Nittayananta W, Carrozzo M, Ranganathan
K. Urban legends series: oral manifestations of
HIV infection. Oral Dis 2013;19(6):533-50.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
10
PREVENTIVE DENTISTRY
Maintenance of Dental Implants
Dental implants have proven to be a
transformative treatment for the replacement
of missing teeth.1 Nevertheless, complications
do occur and it can be anticipated that these
will be encountered more frequently in clinical practice with the widespread adoption
of dental implant treatment.2 Potential complications following osseointegration include
peri-implant mucositis, peri-implantitis,
implant loss, and prosthetic problems. Periimplant mucositis and peri-implantitis, respectively, are similar to gingivitis and periodontitis.3 Peri-implant mucositis is a plaque-induced
inflammation of the peri-implant soft tissues
that presents with bleeding on probing and/or
suppuration, and increased probing depths;
peri-implantitis additionally involves progressive loss of peri-implant bone in excess of the
amount that would be expected with physiological bone remodelling.3
No
maintenance
Irregular
maintenance
94.3%
Regular
maintenance
97.6%
titis, which is especially important since periimplantitis typically progresses more quickly
than periodontitis.3,13 Furthermore, at this time
there is no evidence-based standard of care
or effective nonsurgical intervention treatment for peri-implantitis;3 this further increases the importance of prevention, early diagnosis, and treatment of peri-implant mucositis before it can progress to peri-implantitis.
Given the increasing number of implants
placed each year, improved patient compliance with maintenance therapy is one of the
key components required to combat an
increasing number of complications.
Educating patients on the importance of regular maintenance visits based on individual
risk and encouraging patient personal oral
hygiene are critical to minimize and manage
peri-implant disease, and thereby improve
treatment outcomes for patients. O
C
References
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
87.4%
13.
11
HEALTHCARE TRENDS
The Best Jobs of 2016: Good
News for the Dental Profession?
U
Editor-in-Chief
Ira B. Lamster, DDS, MMSc
Professor of Health Policy &
Management,
Mailman School of Public Health
Dean Emeritus,
Columbia University College of
Dental Medicine
Earn 3 CE credits
for this issue
of the
Oral Care Report
online at
www.colgateprofessional.com.
.S. News and World Report is a weekly magazine covering news and current events. It is well known
for its rankings of colleges and universities, hospitals, and other aspects of our society. The magazines
rankings are well publicized, and are used as an unofficial gauge of what is best in the United States.
A recent report from U.S. News and World Report listed the best jobs for 2016.1 The report ranks jobs in
essential industries, including health care, technology, business, sales and marketing, and social services.
Overall, the editors believe the job market is robust, with a projected increase of 6.5% between 2014 and
2024. This will mean 10 million new jobs in the next decade. The rankings for jobs consider the number
of job opportunities, potential for growth, work-life balance, and compensation. The list includes the 100
top jobs, as well as by specific criteria, such as best salary. Of note, Orthodontist and Dentist were the
two top jobs on the list, and Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon was third on the list of best-paying jobs,
after Anesthesiologist and Surgeon. Dental Hygienist was on the list at number thirty-two.
Since the U.S. News and World Report rankings are highly regarded and often cited, this ranking
reflects positively upon the dental profession. A report such as this, however, must stimulate a broader
discussion of both the current state of the dental profession and the professions future.
The dental profession offers many advantages to someone considering a career in health care.
Enhancing a persons ability to function and eat a balanced diet, alleviating pain when present, and
improving a patients smile, general appearance, and ability to socialize are all important, meaningful
outcomes. Dental providers often develop long-standing relationships with their patients, and become
more than just a provider delivering a service on a routine schedule. However, the external and internal
stressors faced by the profession must also be considered.
The American Dental Association, through its Health Policy Institute, has examined the Future of
Dentistry2 and identified a number of trends that define the profession at present, and will shape the
future. The five trends that define the present include
1. increased utilization of dental services by children, but reduced utilization by working age
adults;
2. cost barriers for some working-age adults needing oral healthcare services;
3. per capita spending on dental services in the United States has plateaued;
4. an increasing number of dentists entering the workforce; and
5. dentists earnings are declining, which is similar to what is seen for other professions, including attorneys and veterinarians.
The 5 forces reshaping dental practice include
1. a changing, larger healthcare environment with a greater emphasis on prevention and wellness, and a so-called pay for performance that places value on longer-term outcomes of
care;
2. an increase in the number of children seeking dental care (due in part to the expansion of
Medicaid coverage), as well as the percent of older adults who require care as edentulism is
reduced;
3. an increase in consumerism as health care is viewed by patients as a commodity and value
becomes important.
4. the need for dental care to consider how it can become involved in interprofessional practice, as the focus shifts to providers working together; and
5. a diminishing number of solo dental practices and a greater number of group practices.
Further, these challenges will be accompanied by opportunities:
1. Dental professionals should welcome the emphasis on value, where the focus is on improved
patient outcomes at a lower cost.
2. The greater demand for services by children and older adults should be addressed. Further,
there is expected to be an increase in the number of adult Medicaid enrollees as states expand
these programs.
3. Collaboration with other healthcare providers will improve patient flow between healthcare
disciplines.
These vectors are driven in part by external forces, but changes in how care is delivered are also
occurring, including a reduced reliance on dental amalgam,3 the development of new, smart dental
materials, and the continuing development of implantology. The use of auxiliaries to expand access to
care continues to be discussed and debated,4 and the ability to provide dental services to a greater number of people will be one critical measure of how successful the dental profession will be in the future.
Change characterizes health care. While health care in general remains an attractive career option,
the dental profession must try to shape, not be shaped, by these influences. As the healthcare landscape
changes, each of us, either individually or as part of a local, regional, or national effort, must participate
in defining the future of the profession. This will be accomplished by balancing exciting clinical advances5,6
with the need to deliver cost-efficient care to the largest number of patients, especially those with difficulty accessing services.7,8 O
C
References:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.