08.09.16 SPECIAL PC FINAL PACKET - Items - 28-122 PDF

Agenda Item No.: 28.
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING

PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: AUGUST 9, 2016
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
SUP-65400 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: HITEX INC OWNER: RZMZ FAMILY, LLC - SERIES 3 - For possible action on a request for a Special Use
Permit FOR A PROPOSED 1,560 SQUARE-FOOT AUTO TITLE LOAN USE WITHIN AN
EXISTING FINANCIAL INSTITUTION, SPECIFIED USE WITH A WAIVER TO ALLOW A
20-FOOT DISTANCE SEPARATION FROM A RESIDENTIAL USE WHERE 200 FEET IS
REQUIRED AND TO ALLOW A 718-FOOT DISTANCE SEPARATION FROM A SIMILAR
USE WHERE 1,000 FEET IS REQUIRED at 2006 East Charleston Boulevard (APN 162-02512-008), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-65341]. Staff recommends
APPROVAL.
MAY GO TO CITY COUNCIL ON 9/21/2016
OR MAY BE FINAL ACTION (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)
PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE:
APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:
Planning Commission Mtg.
City Council Meeting
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:
BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Location, Aerial and Special Maps
2. Conditions and Staff Report
3. Supporting Documentation
4. Photo(s)
5. Justification Letter
6. Support Postcards
SUP-65400 [PRJ-65341]
AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING

PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: AUGUST 9, 2016
DEPARTMENT:
PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: HITEX INC - OWNER: RZMZ FAMILY, LLC SERIES 3
** STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) **
CASE
NUMBER
SUP-65400
RECOMMENDATION
REQUIRED FOR
APPROVAL
** NOTIFICATION **
NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED
NOTICES MAILED
232
APPROVALS
PROTESTS
37
JB
SUP-65400 [PRJ-65341]
Conditions Page One
August 9, 2016 - Planning Commission Meeting
** CONDITIONS **
SUP-65400 CONDITIONS
Planning
1.
Conformance to all Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.12 for an Auto Title
Loan use.
2.
This approval shall be void two years from the date of final approval, unless exercised
pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension of Time may be filed for
consideration by the City of Las Vegas.
3.
Vehicles whose title is serving as security for a loan may not be stored on-site.
4.
All necessary building permits shall be obtained and final inspections shall be completed in
compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department of Building and
Safety.
5.
These Conditions of Approval shall be affixed to the cover sheet of any plan set submitted
for building permit, as well as submitted as part of any business license application.
6.
All City Code requirements and design standards of all City departments must be satisfied,
except as modified herein.
JB
SUP-65400 [PRJ-65341]
Staff Report Page One
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is requesting a Special Use Permit to add a proposed Auto Title Loan use to an
existing 1,560 square-foot Financial Institution, Specified use located at 2006 East Charleston
Boulevard.
ISSUES
The Auto Title Loan use is permitted in the C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning district with
the approval of a Special Use Permit.
A Waiver from Title 19.12 is required to allow to allow a 20-foot distance separation from a
residential use where 200 feet is required and to allow a 916-foot distance separation from a
similar use where 1,000 feet is required.
Staff has added a condition which states, Vehicles whose title is serving as security for a
loan may not be stored on-site.
ANALYSIS
The Auto Title Loan use is defined by Title 19.18 as,
A business whose primary function is to lend money on security of the title to a motor vehicle
rather than on the security of the vehicle itself.
The proposed use meets the definition above, as the provided justification letter states that it is
the applicants intent to add auto title loan services to an existing Financial Institution, Specified
use.
The Minimum Special Use Permit Requirements for this use include:
*1. The use shall comply with all applicable requirements of LVMC Title 6.
The proposed use will meet this requirement, as the proposed site is subject to Business
Licensing inspections.
*2. The building design and color scheme shall be subject to review by the Department to
ensure that it will be harmonious and compatible with the surrounding area.
JB
SUP-65400 [PRJ-65341]
Staff Report Page Two
The proposed use meets this standard, as the use will be located in an existing Financial
Institution, Specified use that is aesthetically compatible with remaining stores located in the
general retail building.
3. No temporary signs (as described in LVMC 19.14.090) such as balloons, inflated
devices, searchlights, pennants, portable billboards, portable signs, streamers, trucks
parked for signage purposes, or other similar devices are permitted, except that banners
announcing a grand opening or that a business is coming soon may be approved
administratively for a period not to exceed 30 days.
The proposed use meets this condition, as the established Financial Institution, Specified use
where the proposed use will locate is code compliant. The applicant has not stated any intent to
alter the existing signage.
4. Windows shall not:
a. Cover more than 20 percent of the area of all interior windows;
b. Include flashing lights or neon lighting; or
c. Include any text other than text that indicates the hours of operation and
whether the business is open or closed.
where the use will be located is code compliant. The applicant has not stated any intent to alter
or add to the existing signage.
5. The hours of operation shall not extend beyond the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m.
The proposed use meets this requirement, as the applicant states in the justification letter that
they will operate the use at the same time as the current Financial Institution, Specified use,
which opens at 8:00 a.m. and closes at 11:00 p.m.
6. The building or portion thereof that is dedicated to the use shall have a minimum size
of 1,500 square feet, and shall be designed to have sufficient interior space to provide for
adequate customer waiting areas, customer queuing, and transaction space (such as
teller windows or desks).
The proposed use meets this requirement, as the existing Financial Institution, Specified use
operates with 1,560 square feet of floor area.
7. No auto title loan use may be located closer than 200 feet from any parcel used or
zoned for residential use. In addition, no auto title loan use may be located closer than
1,000 from any other auto title loan use, auto pawn use or specified financial institution
use. For purposes of this Requirement 7, distances shall be measured in a straight line
from property line, without regard to intervening obstacles. The term property line
refers to property lines of fee interest parcels and not leasehold parcels.
JB
SUP-65400 [PRJ-65341]
Staff Report Page Three
The proposed use does not meet this requirement, as the proposed site is located 20 feet away
from a residentially zoned parcel and within 718 feet of another Financial Institution, Specified
located to the east. The applicant has requested a Waiver to these distance requirements. The
proposed use will be located within an existing Financial Institution, Specified use that has
operated at this location for the past seven years; therefore, staff supports the waiver request
and recommends approval of the Special Use Permit.
The applicant proposes to add the Auto Title Loan use to an existing Financial Institution,
Specified use at 2006 East Charleston Boulevard. The Financial Institution, Specified use has
been operating at this location since 2009, which obtained a Special Use Permit (SUP-20741) for
such a use in the C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning district. The Financial Institution, Specified
use currently opens for business at 8:00 a.m. and closes at 11:00 p.m., and adheres to the
operating hours listed in Title 19.12 for the Auto Title Loan use of 8:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. The
existing use is located within 20 feet of residentially zoned property to the south where a 200foot minimum distance separation is required and is located 718 feet from another Financial
Institution, Specified use to the east where a minimum 1,000-foot distance separation is required.
Although these issues do not affect the existing Financial Institution, Specified use, the proposed
Auto Title Loan use will require Waivers to the Minimum Special Use Permit requirements prior
to being added to the existing Financial Institution, Specified use. Staff supports the requested
waivers, as the impact from the addition of an Auto Title Loan use to an existing Financial
Institution, Specified use will be negligible to the surrounding land uses.
The proposed Auto Title Loan use will share floor area occupied by the existing Financial
Institution, Specified use and does not require any additional parking beyond that which is
provided onsite. The applicant has indicated in the submitted justification letter that all vehicles
whose title is serving as security for a loan will not be stored on-site. Staff has added a condition
which states, Vehicles whose title is serving as security for a loan may not be stored on-site.
Therefore staff recommends approval of the request with conditions.
FINDINGS (SUP-65400)
In order to approve a Special Use Permit application, per Title 19.16.110(L) the Planning
Commission and City Council must affirm the following:
1.
The proposed land use can be conducted in a manner that is harmonious and
compatible with existing surrounding land uses, and with future surrounding land
uses as projected by the General Plan.
The proposed Auto Title Loan use is compatible with the C (Commercial) General Plan
land use designation and is located within an existing general retail building. The proposed
use can be conducted in a manner that is harmonious and compatible with the surrounding
uses.
JB
SUP-65400 [PRJ-65341]
Staff Report Page Four
2.
The subject site is physically suitable for the type and intensity of land use proposed.
The proposed use will be located within an established commercial building and will be
operated in an existing Financial Institution, Specified use. There is no evidence of a
physical constraint to the proposed uses on the subject site.
3.
Street or highway facilities providing access to the property are or will be adequate in
size to meet the requirements of the proposed use.
Primary site access is from Charleston Boulevard, a 100-foot wide Primary Arterial. The
right-of-way provides adequate capacity to serve the proposed use.
4.
Approval of the Special Use Permit at the site in question will not be inconsistent with
or compromise the public health, safety, and welfare or the overall objectives of the
General Plan.
The proposed Auto Title Loan use will be subject to regular inspections by regulatory
agencies for business licensing and will therefore not compromise the publics health,
safety or general welfare, or the overall objectives of the General Plan.
5.
The use meets all of the applicable conditions per Title 19.12.
Although the use does not comply with all of the conditions per Title 19.12, the applicant
has requested Waivers in order for the proposed use to match the business operations of
the existing Financial Institution, Specified use. Staff supports the applicants request as
the addition of the proposed Auto Title Loan use will not alter or intensify the existing use.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc
The Board of City Commissioners approved a Rezoning (Z-0046-56) from R-4
(High Density Residential) to C-1 (Limited Commercial) on the subject site as
05/21/58
part of a larger request.
The Board of Zoning Adjustment approved a request for a Variance (V-006684) to allow 51 parking spaces where 70 spaces are required for an existing
05/24/84
shopping center where a restaurant is proposed on property located at 2000
East Charleston Boulevard.
JB
SUP-65400 [PRJ-65341]
Staff Report Page Five

The City Council approved a request for a Special Use Permit (SUP-20741)
for a proposed Financial Institution, Specified with Waivers to allow a
distance separation of 20 feet from a residential use where a minimum of 200
06/20/07
feet is required and a distance separation of 688 feet from an existing
Financial Institution, Specified where a minimum of 1,000 feet is required at
2006 East Charleston Boulevard. The Planning Commission and staff
recommended denial of the request.
for a proposed 2,770 square-foot Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale Establishment
12/17/14
within an existing restaurant at 2000 East Charleston Boulevard. The
Planning Commission and staff recommended approval of the request.
Most Recent Change of Ownership

04/09/14
A deed was recorded for a change in ownership.
Related Building Permits/Business Licenses

A business license (#N02-00135) was issued for a Non-Depository Lender
09/29/09
(Nova Financial) located at 2006 East Charleston Boulevard. The license is
still active.
A Code Enforcement case (#154544) was processed for unpermitted signs
05/11/15
along top of window at 2006 East Charleston Boulevard. The case was
resolved on 06/08/15.
Pre-Application Meeting
A pre-application meeting was held with the applicant to discuss the submittal
requirements for a proposed Special Use Permit for an Auto Title Loan. Staff
06/22/16
identified the need of waivers for distance separation from a residential
property where 200 feet is required and distance separation from a similar use
where 1,000 feet is required.
Neighborhood Meeting
A neighborhood meeting is not required, nor was one held.
Field Check
06/30/16
Staff conducted a field check of the subject property and noted the site was
well maintained commercial development.
JB
SUP-65400 [PRJ-65341]
Staff Report Page Six
Details of Application Request

Site Area
Net Acres
0.60
Surrounding
Property
Subject Property
Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12
Restaurant
Financial Institution,
Specified
Planned or Special
Land Use Designation
Existing Zoning District
C (Commercial)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
MXU (Mixed Use)
C-2 (General
Commercial)
General Retail Store,

Other Than Listed
North
South
East
West
Restaurant
Other Than Listed
Single Family,
Detached Dwelling
Other Than Listed
Other Than Listed
L (Low Density
Residential)
C (Commercial)
C (Commercial)
R-1 (Single Family

Residential)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
Master Plan Areas

No Applicable Master Plan Area
Special Purpose and Overlay Districts
No Applicable Special Purpose or Overlay Districts
Other Plans or Special Requirements
Trails
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area
Project of Significant Impact (Development Impact Notification Assessment)
Project of Regional Significance
Compliance
N/A
Compliance
N/A
Compliance
N/A
Y
N/A
N/A
JB
SUP-65400 [PRJ-65341]
Staff Report Page Seven
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Street Name
Charleston
Boulevard
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Primary Arterial
Governing Document
Planned Streets and
Highways Map
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Compliance
with Street
Section
100 Feet
Pursuant to Title 19.08 and 19.12, the following parking standards apply:
Parking Requirement
Required
Provided
Compliance
Gross Floor
Parking
Parking
Area or
Use
Parking
HandiHandiNumber of
Ratio
Regular
Regular
capped
capped
Units
1:50 SF of
2,770 SF
seating
(1,697 SF
area plus
Restaurant
seating area &
40
1:200 of
1,073 SF
remaining
remaining)
floor area
Financial
Institution,
1,560 SF
1:250 SF
7
Specified
General Retail
4,260 SF
1:175 SF
24
Store
71*
28*
Y*
TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED
68
3
28*
0
Y*
Regular and Handicap Spaces Required
*The site is parking impaired as defined by Title 19.18.030(D). No additional spaces are
required, as the proposed use does not add to the parking requirement.
Waivers
Requirement
A 200-foot minimum distance
separation is required from any
residentially zoned property.
A 1,000-foot minimum distance
other Similar Use (Financial
Institution, Specified).
Request
To allow a 20-foot distance
separation from a residentially
zoned property. (south)
separation from a Similar Use
(Financial Institution, Specified
east).
Staff Recommendation
Approval
Approval
JB
SUP-65400
SUP-65400
SUP-65400
SUP-65400
SUP-65400
SUP-65400
SUP-65400 [PRJ-65341] SPECIAL USE PERMIT - APPLICANT: HITEX INC

LLC - SERIES 3
2006 EAST CHARLESTON BOULEVARD
06/30/16
- OWNER: RZMZ FAMILY,
SUP-65400 [PRJ-65341] SPECIAL USE PERMIT - APPLICANT: HITEX INC

LLC - SERIES 3
2006 EAST CHARLESTON BOULEVARD
06/30/16
- OWNER: RZMZ FAMILY,
SUP-65400
SUP-65400
SUP-65400

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
SUP-65403 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: CASH OASIS OWNER: CHAI LV, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR A
PROPOSED 1,121 SQUARE-FOOT AUTO TITLE LOAN USE WITHIN AN EXISTING
FINANCIAL INSTITUTION, SPECIFIED USE WITH WAIVERS TO ALLOW A 30-FOOT
DISTANCE SEPARATION FROM A RESIDENTIAL USE WHERE 200 FEET IS REQUIRED
AND TO ALLOW A 1,121 SQUARE-FOOT TENANT SPACE DEDICATED TO THE USE
WHERE 1,500 FEET IS REQUIRED at 5628 West Charleston Boulevard (APN 138-36-408003), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-65377]. Staff recommends
APPROVAL.
RECOMMENDATION:
4. Photo(s)
6. Protest/Support Postcards
SUP-65403 [PRJ-65377]

DEPARTMENT:
PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: CASH OASIS - OWNER: CHAI LV, LLC
CASE
NUMBER
SUP-65403
RECOMMENDATION
REQUIRED FOR
APPROVAL
** NOTIFICATION **
NOTICES MAILED
190
APPROVALS
PROTESTS
22
JB
SUP-65403 [PRJ-65377]
Conditions Page One
** CONDITIONS **
Planning
1.
Loan use.
2.
3.
4.
Safety.
5.
6.
JB
SUP-65403 [PRJ-65377]
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is requesting a Special Use Permit to add a proposed Auto Title Loan use to an
existing 1,121 square-foot Financial Institution, Specified use located at 5628 West Charleston
Boulevard.
ISSUES
The Auto Title Loan use is permitted in the C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning district with
A Waiver from Title 19.12 is required to allow a 30-foot distance separation from a
residential use where 200 feet is required.
A Waiver from Title 19.12 is required to allow a 1,121 square-foot tenant space dedicated to
the use where 1,500 feet is required.
Staff has added a condition which states, Vehicles whose title is serving as security for a
loan may not be stored on-site.
ANALYSIS
use.
JB
SUP-65403 [PRJ-65377]
The proposed use meets this standard, as the use will be located in an existing Financial
Institution, Specified use that is aesthetically compatible with remaining General Retail and
Office, Other than Listed uses located in the building.
which opens at 8:00 a.m. and closes at 11:00 p.m.
The proposed use does not meet this requirement, as the existing Financial Institution, Specified
use operates with 1,121 square feet of floor area. The applicant has requested a Waiver of this
condition to allow the existing floor area utilized for the Financial Institution, Specified use to
remain.
JB
SUP-65403 [PRJ-65377]
The proposed use does not meet this requirement, as the proposed site is located 30 feet away
from a residentially zoned parcel where 200 feet is required. The applicant has requested a
Waiver to address this distance requirement. The proposed use will be located within an existing
Financial Institution, Specified use that has operated at this location for the past seven years;
therefore, staff supports the waiver request.
Specified use at 5628 West Charleston Boulevard. The Financial Institution, Specified use has
been operating at this location since 2009. The subject site is a classified as a legal
nonconforming use, which was established prior to the need for a Special Use Permit outlined by
Title 19.12 for the C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning district. The Financial Institution, Specified
use currently opens for business at 8:00 a.m. and closes at 11:00 p.m., and adheres to the
operating hours listed in Title 19.12 for the Auto Title Loan use of 8:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. The
existing use is located within 30 feet of residentially zoned property to the north where a 200foot minimum distance separation is required. In addition, the existing Financial Institution,
Specified use occupies 1,121 square feet of floor area where 1,500 square feet is required.
Auto Title Loan use will require Waivers to the Minimum Special Use Permit requirements prior
to being added to the existing Financial Institution, Specified use. Staff supports the requested
waivers, as the impact from the addition of an Auto Title Loan use to an existing Financial
Institution, Specified use will be negligible to the surrounding land uses.
1.
JB
SUP-65403 [PRJ-65377]
The proposed Auto Title Loan use is compatible with the MXU (Mixed Use) General Plan
land use designation and is located within an existing general retail building. The proposed
use can be conducted in a manner that is harmonious and compatible with the surrounding
uses.
2.
3.
Primary site access is from Charleston Boulevard, a 100-foot wide Primary Arterial. The
right-of-way provides adequate capacity to serve the proposed use.
4.
General Plan.
5.
has requested Waivers in order for the proposed use to match the business operations of
the existing Financial Institution, Specified use. Staff supports the applicants request as
the addition of the proposed Auto Title Loan use will not alter or intensify the existing use.
The Board of Commissioners approved a zoning reclassification (Z-0106-63)
1963
from R-1 (Single Family Residential) to C-1 (Limited Commercial) and R-4
(Apartment Residence).
The City Council denied a request for a Variance (V-0077-83) for an outdoor
10/19/83
bicycle racetrack at 5620 West Charleston Boulevard.
JB
SUP-65403 [PRJ-65377]

The City Council approved an appeal of a Variance (V-0082-93) to allow a
09/15/93
proposed pawn shop where such use is not allowed, thereby approving the
request. The Board of Zoning Adjustment denied the request on 08/24/93.
The City Council approved a Variance (V-0111-93) to allow the buying and
selling of used jewelry, etc., in conjunction with in conjunction with an
11/17/93
existing pawnshop. The Board of Zoning Adjustment recommended approval
of the request.
06/07/06
for Motorcycle/Motor Scooter Sales at 5620 West Charleston Boulevard. The
Planning Commission and Staff recommended approval of the request.
The Planning Department approved a request for Minor Site Development
05/08/08
Plan Review (SDR-27504) for an exterior renovation to an existing retail
center at 5620 West Charleston Boulevard.
The City Council approved a request for a General Plan Amendment (GPA43991) to establish Redevelopment Area 2 and change the future land use
04/18/12
designation on various parcels within the redevelopment area to Commercial
or Mixed Use. The Planning Commission and Staff recommended approval of
the request.

04/06/09

A business license (#B20-01732) was issued for a Business Support Services
02/05/03
(Hitex Inc.) located at 5628 West Charleston Boulevard. The license is still
active.
09/21/09
(Cash Oasis) located at 5628 West Charleston Boulevard. The license is still
active.
A Code Enforcement case (#88207) was processed for a magnet sign located
03/30/10
at 5628 West Charleston Boulevard. The case was resolved on 07/30/10.
A Code Enforcement case (#95767) was processed for a unpermitted
10/28/10
flag/banner sign located at 5628 West Charleston Boulevard. The case was
JB
SUP-65403 [PRJ-65377]
06/22/16
identified the need of waivers for distance separation from a residential
property where 200 feet is required and to allow a tenant space that does not
meet the 1,500 square-foot minimum listed in Title 19.12.
Field Check
06/30/16

Site Area
Net Acres
0.67
Surrounding
Property
Subject Property
North
South
East
West
Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12
Specified
Other Than Listed
Office, Other than
Listed
Single Family,
Detached Dwelling
Liquor
Establishment
(Tavern)
Other Than Listed
Planned or Special
MXU (Mixed Use)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
L (Low Density
Residential)
R-1 (Single Family

Residential)
MXU (Mixed Use)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
Banquet Facility
MXU (Mixed Use)
Auto Repair Garage,

Minor
Other Than Listed
MXU (Mixed Use)

MXU (Mixed Use)
C-2 (General
Commercial)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
JB
SUP-65403 [PRJ-65377]
Master Plan Areas

A-O (Airport Overlay) District (200 Feet)
Trails
*The subject site is located within 500 feet of the Citys jurisdictional boundary.
Compliance
N/A
Compliance
Y
Compliance
N/A
Y
Y*
Y*
Street Name
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Charleston
Boulevard
Primary Arterial
Governing Document
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Compliance
with Street
Section
Planned Streets and

Highways Map
100 Feet
Parking Requirement
Required
Provided
Compliance
Gross Floor
Parking
Parking
Area or
Use
Parking
HandiHandiNumber of
Ratio
Regular
Regular
capped
capped
Units
Financial
Institution,
1,121 SF
1:250 SF
5
Specified
General Retail
Store, Other
619 SF
1:175 SF
4
Than Listed
Office, Other
9,180 SF
1:300 SF
31
than Listed
40
31*
Y*
38
2
30*
1*
Y*
*The site is parking impaired as defined by Title 19.18.030(D). No additional spaces are
required, as the proposed use does not add to the parking requirement.
JB
SUP-65403 [PRJ-65377]
Staff Report Page Eight
Waivers
Requirement
A 1,500-foot tenant space is
required.
Request
zoned property. (north)
To allow a 1,121 square-foot
tenant space.
Approval
Approval
JB
SUP-65403
SUP-65403
SUP-65403
SUP-65403
SUP-65403
SUP-65403 [PRJ-65377] SPECIAL USE PERMIT - APPLICANT: CASH OASIS - OWNER: CHAI LV, LLC
5628 WEST CHARLESTON BOULEVARD
06/30/16
SUP-65403 - REVISED
SUP-65403 - REVISED

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
SUP-65404 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: CASH NEVADA
- OWNER: RAFI OHANIAN REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST - For possible action on a request
for a Special Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED 1,520 SQUARE-FOOT AUTO TITLE LOAN
USE WITHIN AN EXISTING FINANCIAL INSTITUTION, SPECIFIED USE WITH A
WAIVER TO ALLOW A ZERO-FOOT DISTANCE SEPARATION FROM A RESIDENTIAL
USE WHERE 200 FEET IS REQUIRED at 1117 North Nellis Boulevard (APN 140-29-601005), C-2 (General Commercial) Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-65325]. Staff recommends
APPROVAL.
RECOMMENDATION:
4. Photo(s)
SUP-65404 [PRJ-65325]

DEPARTMENT:
PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: CASH NEVADA - OWNER: RAFI OHANIAN
REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST
CASE
NUMBER
SUP-65404
RECOMMENDATION
REQUIRED FOR
APPROVAL
** NOTIFICATION **
NOTICES MAILED
116
APPROVALS
PROTESTS
10
JB
SUP-65404 [PRJ-65325]
Conditions Page One
** CONDITIONS **
Planning
1.
Loan use.
2.
3.
4.
Safety.
5.
6.
JB
SUP-65404 [PRJ-65325]
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is requesting a Special Use Permit to add a proposed 1,520 square-foot Auto Title
Loan use to an existing Financial Institution, Specified use located at 1117 North Nellis
Boulevard.
ISSUES
The Auto Title Loan use is permitted in the C-2 (General Commercial) zoning district with
A Waiver from Title 19.12 is required to allow a zero-foot distance separation from a
residential use where 200 feet is required.
ANALYSIS
use.
The proposed use meets this standard as the use will be located in an existing Financial
Institution, Specified use that is aesthetically compatible with remaining general retail uses
located in the building.
JB
SUP-65404 [PRJ-65325]
Staff Report Page tWO

which opens at 8:00 a.m. and closes at 11:00p.m.
The proposed use meets this requirement, as the existing Financial Institution, Specified use
operates with 1,520 square feet of floor area.
JB
SUP-65404 [PRJ-65325]
The proposed use does not meet this requirement, as the proposed site is located zero feet away
from a residentially zoned parcel where 200 feet is required. The applicant has requested a
Waiver to address this distance requirement. The proposed use will be located within an existing
Financial Institution, Specified use that has operated at this location for the past seven years;
therefore, staff supports the waiver request.
Specified use at 1117 North Nellis Boulevard. The Financial Institution, Specified use has been
operating at this location since 2009. The subject site is a classified as a legal nonconforming
use, which was established prior to the need for a Special Use Permit outlined by Title 19.12 for
the C-2 (General Commercial) zoning district. The Financial Institution, Specified use currently
opens for business at 8:00 a.m. and closes at 11:00 p.m., and adheres to the operating hours listed
in Title 19.12 for the Auto Title Loan use of 8:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. The existing use is located
zero feet from a residentially zoned property to the west where a 200-foot minimum distance
separation is required.
Auto Title Loan use will require a Waiver of the Minimum Special Use Permit requirements
prior to being added to the existing Financial Institution, Specified use. Staff supports the
requested waiver, as the impact from the addition of an Auto Title Loan use to an existing
Financial Institution, Specified use will be negligible to the surrounding land uses.
1.
The proposed Auto Title Loan use is compatible with the GC (General Commercial)
General Plan land use designation and is located within an existing general retail building.
The proposed use can be conducted in a manner that is harmonious and compatible with
the surrounding uses.
JB
SUP-65404 [PRJ-65325]
2.
3.
Primary site access is from Nellis Boulevard, a 100-foot wide Primary Arterial. The rightof-way provides adequate capacity to serve the proposed use.
4.
General Plan.
5.
has requested a Waiver of distance separation from a residential property in order for the
proposed use to match the business operations of the existing Financial Institution,
Specified use. Staff supports the applicants request, as the addition of the proposed Auto
Title Loan use will not alter or intensify the existing use.
Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc.
There are no related relevant City Actions related to the subject site.
05/15/09
09/21/09
(Cash Nevada) located at 1117 North Nellis Boulevard. The license is still
active.
JB
SUP-65404 [PRJ-65325]
06/22/16
identified the need of a waiver for distance separation from a residential
property where 200 feet is required.
Field Check
06/30/16

Site Area
Net Acres
0.64
Surrounding
Property
Subject Property
North
South
Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12
Specified
Other Than Listed
Mini-Storage
Facility
Parking Lot
Planned or Special
GC (General
Commercial)
C-2 (General
Commercial)
GC (General
Commercial)
GC (General
Commercial)
C-2 (General
Commercial)
C-2 (General
Commercial)
C-2 (General
Commercial) Clark
County
East

Other Than Listed
CG (Commercial
General) Clark County
West
Single Family,
Detached Dwelling
R (Rural Density
Residential)
Master Plan Areas

R-E (Residence Estates)
Compliance
N/A
JB
SUP-65404 [PRJ-65325]

Rural Preservation Overlay District
Trails
*The subject site is located within 500 feet of the Citys jurisdictional boundary.
Compliance
Y
Compliance
N/A
N/A
Y*
Y*
Street Name
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Nellis Boulevard
Primary Arterial
Governing Document
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Compliance
with Street
Section
Planned Streets and

Highways Map
100 Feet
Parking Requirement
Required
Provided
Compliance
Gross Floor
Parking
Parking
Area or
Use
Parking
HandiHandiNumber of
Ratio
Regular
Regular
capped
capped
Units
Financial
Institution,
1,520 SF
1:250 SF
7
Specified
General Retail
Store, Other
13,830 SF
1:175 SF
80
Than Listed
87
72
Y*
84
3
64
8
Y*
*The site is parking impaired as defined by Title 19.18.030(D).
Waivers
Requirement
Request
To allow a zero-foot distance
zoned property. (west)
Approval
JB
SUP-65404
SUP-65404
SUP-65404
SUP-65404
SUP-65404
SUP-65404 [PRJ-65325] SPECIAL USE PERMIT - APPLICANT: CASH NEVADA - OWNER: RAFI
OHANIAN REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST
1117 NORTH NELLIS BOULEVARD
06/30/16
SUP-65404 - REVISED

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
SUP-65405 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: THE URBAN
LOUNGE - OWNER: MAIN STREET INVESTMENTS, LLC - For possible action on a request
for a Special Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED 1,657 SQUARE-FOOT TAVERN-LIMITED
ESTABLISHMENT USE at 60 East California Street (APN 162-03-110-081), C-M
(Commercial/Industrial) Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-65218]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
RECOMMENDATION:
4. Photo(s)
SUP-65405 [PRJ-65218]

DEPARTMENT:
PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: THE URBAN LOUNGE - OWNER: MAIN
STREET INVESTMENTS, LLC
CASE
NUMBER
SUP-65405
RECOMMENDATION
REQUIRED FOR
APPROVAL
N/A
** NOTIFICATION **
NOTICES MAILED
223
APPROVALS
PROTESTS
30
RG
SUP-65405 [PRJ-65218]
Conditions Page One
** CONDITIONS **
Planning
1.
Conformance to all Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.12 for a TavernLimited Establishment use.
2.
3.
Safety.
4.
5.
Minors shall only be permitted in such areas wherein spirituous, malt or fermented liquors
or wines are served only in conjunction with regular meals and where dining tables or
booths are provided separate from the bar in conformance with Title 6.50.
6.
Approval of this Special Use Permit does not constitute approval of a liquor license.
7.
This business shall operate in conformance to Chapter 6.50 of the City of Las Vegas
Municipal Code.
8.
RG
SUP-65405 [PRJ-65218]
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This is a request for a Special Use Permit for a proposed 1,657 square-foot Tavern-Limited use
at 60 East California Street. The subject property contains an existing multi-tenant building and
is located within the 18b Las Vegas Arts District of the Downtown Centennial Plan.
ISSUES
A Tavern-Limited Establishment use is permitted in the C-M (Commercial/Industrial) zoning

district with the approval of a Special Use Permit. Staff supports this application request.
ANALYSIS
The Tavern-Limited Establishment use is defined as An establishment that is licensed with a
tavern-limited license in accordance with LVMC Chapter 6.50. A business license can only be
issued for this use on property that is located within the Downtown Centennial Plan. The
proposed establishment will provide entertainment with no more than 50 percent of the floor area
within the establishment. As proposed, the use is in compliance with Title 19, with no Minimum
Special Use Permit Requirements.
The Las Vegas Valley Water District (LVVWD) has commented on the requested Special Use
Permit, This parcel is currently served but does not have the required backflow prevention per
NAC 445A.67195. Civil and plumbing plans will need to be submitted to LVVWD for domestic
meter sizing, fire flow availability and backflow retrofit. It should be noted that the main and
meter serving this parcel are located on California Street and the above-ground backflow
prevention assembly will be within the right of way unless the service is relocated. Pursuant to
the Downtown Centennial Plan Standards, Utility vaults shall be located underground for all
new developments. Ideally, these will be incorporated within the building footprint. In no case
shall they be located along the street frontage of the project. If the assembly cannot be designed
to meet the standards, a Waiver application of the Downtown Centennial Plan will be required.
The subject property is designated as C-M (Commercial/Industrial) zoning district. A Special
Use Permit application for a Tavern-Limited Establishment use is required for approval within
the 18b Las Vegas Arts District of the Downtown Centennial Plan and pursuant to Title 19.12.
There are no Minimum Special Use Permit Requirements; therefore, the proposed use can be
conducted in a manner that is harmonious and compatible with existing and future surrounding
land uses. Staff recommends approval, with conditions. If this Special Use Permit application is
denied, the proposed Tavern-Limited Establishment use cannot be operated at this location.
RG
SUP-65405 [PRJ-65218]
1.
The proposed Tavern-Limited Establishment use can be conducted in a manner that is
harmonious and compatible with existing and future surrounding land uses. The subject
property for the proposed use is located within the 18b Las Vegas Arts District.
2.
The subject site is physically suitable for a proposed Tavern-Limited Establishment use
and is in close proximity to other Taverns-Limited and Urban Lounges in the area.
3.
Site access is provided from California Street, a 70-foot local street. California Street is
sufficient in size to accommodate the needs of the proposed use.
4.
General Plan.
Approval of this proposed Special Use Permit will not compromise the public health,
safety and general welfare of the public. The use will be subject to regular inspections and
is subject to licensing restrictions.
5.
There are no applicable Minimum Special Use Permit Requirements listed in Title 19.12
for the Tavern-Limited Establishment use.
RG
SUP-65405 [PRJ-65218]
A code enforcement case (#158593) was processed for water palette located
08/20/15
behind the property at 1201 South Main Street. The case was resolved on
08/24/16.
A code enforcement case (#162103) was processed for graffiti at 1201 South
01/05/16
Main Street. The case was resolved on 01/20/16.

08/12/15

A business license (P64-00138) was processed for a Tavern Limited at 1201
South Main Street. The license has not been issued.
07/05/16
A business license (G64-04961) was processed for a Food Service at 1201
South Main Street. The license has not been issued.
06/16/16
A pre-application meeting with the applicant was held.
A neighborhood meeting was not required, nor was one held.
Field Check
06/30/16
A field check by staff notes that the subject suite is currently vacant and the
property is well maintained.

Site Area
Net Acres
0.34
RG
SUP-65405 [PRJ-65218]
Surrounding
Property
Subject Property
North
South
East
Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12
Other Than Listed
Restaurant with
Service Bar
Other Than Listed
Other Than Listed
Planned or Special
C (Commercial)
C-M
(Commercial/Industrial)
Vacant
MXU (Mixed Use)
C (Commercial)
C (Commercial)
Urban Lounge
West
Restaurant
C (Commercial)
C-M
C-M
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
C-M
Master Plan Areas

Downtown Centennial Plan
Downtown Centennial Plan Overlay District
Live/Work Overlay District
Trails
Compliance
Y
Compliance
Y
N/A
Compliance
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Street Name
California Street
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
local
Governing Document
N/A
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
70
Compliance
with Street
Section
Y
RG
SUP-65405 [PRJ-65218]
Parking Requirement - Downtown
Base Parking Requirement
Provided
Compliance
Gross Floor
Parking
Parking
Area or
Use
Parking
HandiHandiNumber of
Ratio
Regular
Regular
capped
capped
Units
911 SF
Tavern1/50 SF
20
(seating area)
Limited
Establishment 746 SF (back
1/200 SF
4
(Proposed)
of house)
1,033 SF
(indoor
1/50 SF
21
seating)
Restaurant
463 SF
with Service
(outdoor
1/50 SF
10
Bar
seating)
731 SF (back
1/200 SF
4
of house)
General Retail
Store, Other
7,363 SF
1/175 SF
43
than Listed
102
0
Y
97
5
0
0
Y
Projects located within the Las Vegas Downtown Centennial Plan area are not subject to the
automatic application of parking requirements. However, the above table should be used to illustrate
the requirements of an analogous project in another location in the City.
RG
SUP-65405
SUP-65405
SUP-65405
SUP-65405 [PRJ-65218] SPECIAL USE PERMIT - APPLICANT: THE URBAN LOUNGE - OWNER: MAIN
STREET INVESTMENTS, LLC
60 EAST CALIFORNIA STREET
06/30/16
77
7
77
777
7777
777777
777777
777
b777
7
777
777
7b77777A7777777
A77
7777b
7777777777777
7777777777777
777774777A77777
777777777777777777
7777777777777
777
7
7
7

SUP-65405

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
SUP-65419 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: FU ZU BA
SCHOOL OF MASSAGE AND REFLEXOLOGY - OWNER: G G P MEADOWS MALL, LLC
- For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED 165 SQUAREFOOT MASSAGE ESTABLISHMENT WITH A WAIVER TO ALLOW A DISTANCE
SEPARATION OF ZERO FEET FROM A CHURCH/HOUSE OF WORSHIP AND 100 FEET
FROM A SCHOOL USE WHERE 400 FEET IS THE MINIMUM DISTANCE REQUIRED at
4300 Meadows Lane (APN 139-31-510-019), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 1
(Tarkanian) [PRJ-64883]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
RECOMMENDATION:
4. Photo(s)
SUP-65419 [PRJ-64883]

DEPARTMENT:
PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: - APPLICANT: FU ZU BA SCHOOL OF MASSAGE AND
REFLEXOLOGY - OWNER: G G P MEADOWS MALL, LLC
CASE
NUMBER
SUP-65419
RECOMMENDATION
REQUIRED FOR
APPROVAL
** NOTIFICATION **
NOTICES MAILED
371
APPROVALS
PROTESTS
31
NE
SUP-65419 [PRJ-64883]
Conditions Page One
** CONDITIONS **
Planning
1.
Conformance to all Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.12 for a Massage
Establishment use.
2.
3.
A Waiver from Title 19.12 is hereby approved, to allow a zero-foot distance separation
from a Church/House of Worship where 400 feet is required.
4.
A Waiver from Title 19.12 is hereby approved, to allow a 100-foot distance separation
from a School where 400 feet is required.
5.
Safety.
6.
7.
NE
SUP-65419 [PRJ-64883]
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This application is a request for a Special Use Permit for a Massage Establishment use to be
located within a Regional Mall located at 4300 Meadows Lane.
ISSUES
A Special Use Permit is required to operate a Massage Establishment use within the C-1
(Limited Commercial) zoning district.
A Waiver is requested to allow a distance separation of zero feet from a Church/House of
Worship, where 400 feet is required.
A Waiver is requested to allow a distance separation of 100 feet from a School where 400
feet is required.
ANALYSIS
The proposed Massage Establishment use will occupy approximately 162 square feet of common
kiosk area on the second floor of the JC Penney wing of the regional mall. The applicant has
proposed four ergonomic massage chairs, and a small stand for a cash register. Services will be
provided in the common kiosk area by licensed massage professionals during mall hours only.
There are no walls or privacy screens surrounding the proposed use.
The Massage Establishment use requires a Special Use Permit in the C-1 (Limited Commercial)
zoning district. Due to the subject site encompassing approximately 80 acres, the proposed
location was unable to meet the distance separation requirements set forth by Title 19.12 for a
Massage Establishment use. Because the services offered by the Massage Establishment will be
performed in an open, common kiosk area of the mall on ergonomic massage chairs, staff
supports the requested Waivers.
The Massage Establishment use is defined by Title 19.12 as A facility which is occupied and
used for the purpose of practicing massage therapy as defined in LVMC Chapter 6.52. This use
does not include the accessory massage, as defined in this Title.
1. Requirement 1:
The use shall comply with all applicable requirements of LVMC

Title 6.
NE
SUP-65419 [PRJ-64883]
The proposed use is subject to all applicable code requirements including Title 6, if not in
compliance the business license will be revoked.
2. Requirement 2:
The use must be located on a secondary thoroughfare or larger.
The proposed use meets this requirement as the subject site is adjacent to Valley View
Boulevard, an 80-foot Major Collector as defined by the Master Plan of Streets and
Highways. /
3. Requirement 3:
The use may not be located within 400 feet of any church/house of
worship, school, City park, individual care center licensed for more
than 12 children, or any parcel zoned for residential use.
The proposed use meets does not meet this requirement as the applicant has requested a
Waiver to allow a zero-foot distance separation from a Church/House of Worship, and a
100-foot distance separation from a school where 400 feet is required for both. The
subject site for the proposed Massage Establishment is the common area of a regional
mall, with the Massage Establishment use to be set-up as a kiosk type facility. With the
Massage Establishment being a kiosk in the common area of a regional mall, staff is
supporting both Waiver requests.
4. Requirement 4:
The use may not be located within 1,000 feet of any other massage
establishment.
There is no other Massage Establishment within 1,000 feet of the subject site and the
proposed use meets this requirement.
5. Requirement 5:
The hours of operation shall be limited to the period between 6:00

a.m. and 10:00 p.m., unless further limited by the City Council on
a case-by-case basis.
The proposed use will be subject to mall operating hours which are 10: a.m. to 9:00 p.m.
Monday through Saturday, and 11:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. on Sundays, thus meeting this
requirement.
Staff recommends approval of this request with conditions, as the proposed kiosk will be located
within the Regional Mall and can be operated in a manner that is compatible and harmonious
with nearby uses. If the requested Special Use Permit is denied, the applicant will not be able to
operate his business from this location.
NE
SUP-65419 [PRJ-64883]
1.
The proposed Massage Establishment use can be conducted in a manner that is
harmonious and compatible with existing surrounding land uses and with future uses as
projected by the General Plan. As the Massage Establishment use is operated from a
commercial kiosk and located inside the Regional Mall, this use will be have no adverse
impact on the surrounding properties.
2.
The subject site is physically suitable for the type and intensity of land use proposed. The
site has been in operation as a Regional Mall since 1978 without major incident or impact
to the adjacent properties.
3.
The site is accessed from Valley View Boulevard and Meadows Lane, both of which
adequately support the existing regional mall.
4.
General Plan.
The approval of this Special Use Permit will not be inconsistent with or compromise the
public health, safety, and welfare or the overall objectives of the General Plan. The
proposed Massage Establishment use is consistent with the operation of a Regional Mall
use and the overall objectives of the General Plan.
5.
The proposed Massage Establishment use does not meet requirement number three as the
proposed use when measured parcel line to parcel line does not meet the distance
separation requirements for two protected uses. The Massage Establishment is being
proposed as a kiosk in the common area of the regional mall, and staff supports the
Waivers requested.
NE
SUP-65419 [PRJ-64883]
There are no relevant City actions related to this application.

08/01/03

There are no related building permits or business licenses relevant to this application.
Staff conducted a pre-application meeting where the submittal requirements
05/31/16
for a Special Use Permit were discussed.
Field Check
06/30/16
Staff performed a routine field of the regional mall where the exterior and the
interior of the subject site was well-maintained and free of trash and debris.

Site Area
Net Acres
80
Surrounding
Property
Subject Property
North
South
Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12
Regional Mall
Right-of-Way
Elementary School
Single-Family
Residences
Planned or Special
SC (Service
Commercial)
Right-of-Way
PF (Public Facilities)
L (Low Density
Residential)

C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
Right-of-Way
C-V (Civic)
R-1 (Single Family
Residential)
NE
SUP-65419 [PRJ-64883]
Surrounding
Property
East
West
Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12
Museum and
Outdoor Gardens
Shopping Center
Planned or Special
C-V (Civic)
SC (Service
Commercial)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
Master Plan Areas

A-O (Airport Overlay) District -140 Feet
Trails Pioneer Trail
Meadows Walkable Community Plan
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area Redevelopment Area 2
Compliance
N/A
Compliance
Y
Compliance
Y
Y
Y
N/A
N/A
Street Name
Meadows Lane
Valley View
Boulevard
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Local
Major Collector
Governing Document
Title 13
Master Plan of Streets
and Highways
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
70
Compliance
with Street
Section
Y
80
Parking Requirement
Required
Provided
Compliance
Gross Floor
Parking
Parking
Area or
Use
Parking
HandiHandiNumber of
Ratio
Regular
Regular
capped
capped
Units
Regional Mall 1,153,159 SF
1:250
4,613
4,613
5,188
Y
4,556
57
5,156
32
Y
NE
SUP-65419 [PRJ-64883]
Waivers
Requirement
separation is required from a
Church/House of Worship.
separation is required from a
School.
Request
To allow a zero-foot distance
separation from a Church/House
Approval
of Worship.
separation from a School.
Approval
NE
SUP-65419
7
SUP-65419
77b7A7b77777
b777777
77
77
77
77
77
7
b
b
b
SUP-65419
SUP-65419
7777777777
SUP-65419
SUP-65419
SUP-65419
77777A
b7
SUP-65419 [PRJ-64883] SPECIAL USE PERMIT - APPLICANT: FU ZU BA SCHOOL OF MASSAGE AND

4300 MEADOWS LANE
06/30/16

4300 MEADOWS LANE
06/30/16

4300 MEADOWS LANE
06/30/16
777777
77
7777
777777
7777
77777*777
*777777
77
7 b7777777
777 7777b7777
7b
*77777777777777777
77777777b777
777777777777777777
77777777**777777777
77777777777777b7777777
77777777777777777
77777777777777777777
7777A77777777777
777777777 7777
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
77777777
777777777777777
7b7777777777777
7777777777777777
777777777777
7b7777777 777777
77777777>7b7777777
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7777777777777777
7777777777
77777777777777777777
7777 7 77777777777777
777 77777777 77
77777777777777
777777777777
77
SUP-65419
SUP-65419
77777A

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
VAC-65407 - VACATION - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: THE HOWARD
HUGHES COMPANY, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Petition to Vacate a portion
of Lake Mead Boulevard generally located west of Clark County 215, Ward 2 (Beers) [PRJ65201]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps
4. Photo(s)
VAC-65407 [PRJ-65201]

DEPARTMENT:
PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION:
CASE
NUMBER
VAC-65407
RECOMMENDATION
REQUIRED FOR
APPROVAL
** NOTIFICATION **
NOTICES MAILED
APPROVALS
PROTESTS
NE
VAC-65407 [PRJ-65201]
Conditions Page One
** CONDITIONS **
VAC-65407 CONDITIONS
1.
The limits of this Petition of Vacation shall be defined as a sliver of right-of-way on Lake
Mead Boulevard located generally west of Clark County 215.
2.
Prior to or concurrent with the recordation of the Order of Vacation, dedicate the portions
of Lake Mead Boulevard, if any, that will not be part of a Summerlin owned and
maintained median island adjacent to the area being requested for vacation.
3.
Prior to the recordation of the Order of Vacation, construction drawings for the new
median and roadway improvements for Lake Mead Boulevard that correspond to this
vacation request shall be approved by the City Engineer.
4.
All public improvements, if any, adjacent to and in conflict with this vacation application
are to be modified, as necessary, at the applicant's expense prior to the recordation of an
Order of Vacation.
5.
The Order of Vacation shall not be recorded until all of the conditions of approval have
been met provided, however, that conditions requiring modification of public
improvements may be fulfilled for purposes of recordation by providing sufficient security
for the performance thereof in accordance with the Subdivision Ordinance of the City of
Las Vegas. City Staff is empowered to modify this application if necessary because of
technical concerns or because of other related review actions as long as current City right
of way requirements are still complied with and the intent of the vacation application is not
changed. If applicable, a five foot wide easement for public streetlight and fire hydrant
purposes shall be retained on all vacation actions abutting public street corridors that will
remain dedicated and available for public use. Also, if applicable and where needed, public
easement corridors and sight visibility or other easements that would/should cross any
right-of-way or easement being vacated must be retained.
6.
Reservation of easements for the facilities of the various utility companies together with
reasonable ingress thereto and egress there from shall be provided if required.
7.
All development shall be in conformance with code requirements and design standards of
all City Departments.
8.
If the Order of Vacation (or Order of Relinquishment of Interest if a Patent Reservation)

is not recorded within one (1) year after approval by the City of Las Vegas or an Extension
of Time is not granted by the Planning Director, then approval will terminate and a new
petition must be submitted.
NE
VAC-65407 [PRJ-65201]
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is petitioning to vacate a portion of right-of-way within Lake Mead Boulevard,
immediately west of the Clark County 215 Beltway.
ANALYSIS
The median island line work from the recorded Summerlin Village 26 Parcel Map (PMP-61340)
did not align with the existing improvements constructed on Lake Mead Boulevard with the
Clark County 215 Beltway. The vacation is necessary to correct and align future Lake Mead
Boulevard median island improvements and right-of-way with the existing median island and
right-of-way constructed to date; therefore, staff recommends approval of this application.
Public Works had the following comments:
1.
Does this vacation request result in uniform or non-uniform right-of-way widths?

Neither, this is for the location of a future median.
2.
From a traffic handling viewpoint will this vacation request result in a reduced traffic
handling capability?
No, since it is a sliver of right-of-way to match median island geometrics.
3.
Does it appear that the vacation request involves only excess right-of-way?
Yes.
4.
Does this vacation request coincide with development plans of the adjacent parcels?
Yes, Summerlins Lake Mead Boulevard design.
5.
Does this vacation request eliminate public street access to any abutting parcel?
No.
6.
Does this vacation request result in a conflict with any existing City requirements?
No.
NE
VAC-65407 [PRJ-65201]
7.
Does the Department of Public Works have an objection to this vacation request?
No.
FINDINGS
The vacation request is to correct a mapping error and ensure that future median alignment along
Lake Mead Boulevard is in sync with existing improvements. Staff recommends approval of this
application.
The City Council approved a request for a Major Modification (MOD-12395)
to the Summerlin Master Plan to amend the existing land use designation
from ER (Estate Residential) to SF-3 (Single Family Detached), MF-2
07/06/06
(Medium Density Multi-Family), COS (Community Open Space), and COS-1
(Drainage Channel) in Village 26 on 314.36 acres adjacent to the northwest
corner of Clark County 215 and Lake Mead Boulevard. The Planning
Commission and staff recommended approval.
The City Council approved a request for a Summerlin Major Modification
(MOD-61039) of an approved Development Plan for Village 26 on 300.16
acres at the northwest corner of Lake Mead Boulevard and Clark County 215.
The Planning Commission and staff recommended approval.
The City Council approved a request for a Tentative Map (TMP-60968) for a
master planned village containing 323 single-family residential lots, one
11/18/15
multi-family residential lot, and 14 large pod lots on 300.16 acres at the
northwest corner of Lake Mead Boulevard and Clark County 215. The
Planning Commission and staff recommended approval.
Parcel Map (PMP-61340) was released for recordation for the technical
review of a four-lot parcel map on 150.05 acres at the southwest corner of
Lake Mead Boulevard and Clark County 215.

There are no building permits or business licenses related to this petition to vacate.
NE
VAC-65407 [PRJ-65201]
06/15/16
for a petition to vacate were discussed. This particular portion of Lake Mead
Boulevard is currently not open to vehicular traffic.
Field Check
06/30/16
Staff conducted a routine field check where the portion of Lake Mead
Boulevard to be vacated was observed.
Street Name
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Governing Document
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Compliance
with Street
Section
Lake Mead
Boulevard
Primary Arterial

and Highways
100
NE
VAC-65407
VAC-65407
VAC-65407
VAC-65407
VAC-65407
VAC-65407
VAC-65407 [PRJ-65201] VACATION - APPLICANT/OWNER: THE HOWARD HUGHES COMPANY, LLC

A PORTION OF LAKE MEAD BOULEVARD WEST OF CLARK COUNTY 215
06/30/16
VAC-65407 [PRJ-65201] VACATION - APPLICANT/OWNER: THE HOWARD HUGHES COMPANY, LLC

A PORTION OF LAKE MEAD BOULEVARD WEST OF CLARK COUNTY 215
06/30/16
VAC-65407

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
HPC-64622 - HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION - PUBLIC HEARING - For
possible action on a request to designate the Beverly Green Historic District, generally bound by
Oakey Boulevard (on the north), Rexford Drive (on the west), East St. Louis Avenue (on the
south), and South 6th Street (on the east), to be included on the City of Las Vegas Historic
Property Register as a Historic District, Multiple APNs, R-1 (Single Family Residential) Zone,
Ward 3 (Coffin). Staff recommends APPROVAL.
RECOMMENDATION:
NONE
4. Protest/Support Postcards submitted for the Historic Preservation Commission Meeting
5. Historic Preservation Commission Meeting of June 22, 2016 Action Letter
Agenda Item No.: 6
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE

HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING OF: JUNE 22, 2016
DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Action
HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER:
COURTNEY MOONEY
Report
SUBJECT:
HPC-64622 Discussion and possible action regarding an application to designate the Beverly
Green Historic District, generally bound by Oakey Boulevard (on the north), Rexford Drive (on
the west), East St. Louis Avenue (on the south), and South 6th Street (on the east), to be included
on the City of Las Vegas Historic Property Register as a Historic District, multiple APNs, R-1
(Single Family Residential) Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin).
PURPOSE/BACKGROUND:
The Beverly Green Neighborhood Association has submitted an application to nominate the
Beverly Green Historic District (boundaries in subject) on the City of Las Vegas Historic
Property Register as a Historic District.
If recommended for approval at the June 22, 2016 Commission meeting, the item will be
scheduled for consideration by the Planning Commission and City Council.
The Beverly Green Neighborhood Association will schedule an additional informational public
meeting in July. The date will be published as soon as it is determined.
FINDINGS:
The Historic Preservation Officer has reviewed the nomination and has found that the district
meets the following criteria for designation as a Historic District on the City of Las Vegas
Historic Property Register, Chapter 19.10.150, Section I.1:
b. It is determined to be of exceptional local significance and expresses a distinctive
character because:
i. A significant portion of it is at least 40 years old;
ii. It is reflective of the Citys cultural, social, political or economic past; and
iii. Either: (A) It is associated with a person or event significant in local, state or
national history; or (B) It represents an established and familiar visual feature of
an area of the City because of its location or singular physical appearance.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approval
Application for historic district designation and required documentation
NOTICES MAILED
707 (By Planning)
Agenda Item No.: 6

Included for 05/25/16
Included for 6/22/16
Application for historic district

Application for historic district
designation
designation
Statement of eligibility and survey reports Statement of eligibility and survey reports
Letter of property owner consent
Letter of property owner consent
Letter of request for action.
Letter of request for action.

Vicinity ownership map
List of property owners and addresses
within the proposed district
Legal descriptions for four corner
properties within the proposed district
Documentation of a minimum of three
public meetings
Statement of Financial Interest.
HPC-64622
Statement of Eligibility
Beverly Green Historic District
Las Vegas, Nevada
Summary
The Beverly Green neighborhood is being nominated to the City of Las Vegas Historic Property
Register because it meets several of the criteria for such a designation: (1) all of the included
buildings are at least forty years old; (2) it is reflective of the City's cultural, social, political and
economic past; and (3) it represents an established visual feature of this area. The proposed
Beverly Green Historic District also meets the additional requirements for a historic district
because it includes a substantial concentration of contributing and individually eligible buildings;
it is bounded by historic boundaries, in this case, subdivision plats; and it includes noncontributing properties only to the extent necessary to establish appropriate boundaries.
The period of significance for the Beverly Green Historic District begins in 1951 when the first
tract was platted by David Zenoff and Jerome Mack of Federal Homes. The period of
significance ends in 1964 when the bulk of the construction of these homes was completed.
Tracts 1 and 3 in the proposed district were developed by a single developer, Federal Homes, and
were all custom homes, many designed by well-known local architects. While tract 4 was
developed by Melvin Moss' Beverly Green Development Company and designed by David
Freedman and Don Van Camp, the design continuity with the two earlier tracts mainly Ranch
style of which some have Modern characteristics serve to create a coherent look to the
proposed historic district.
Not only is Beverly Green significant for its architecture, but it was also home to many wellknown Las Vegans from pit bosses and casino owners to local politicians and business owners.
As "Las Vegas' Finest Residential Area" (LVRJ, 1960), it was home to many of the early creators
of Las Vegas. Coupled with the significant architecture of these homes, Beverly Green serves as
an excellent example of both the expansion of Las Vegas and the styles of architecture that were
characteristic of mid-century Las Vegas.
The Beverly Green Historic District
Beverly Green is comprised of 117 single family homes and 7 multi-family buildings. It is
bounded on the north by Oakey Boulevard and at the south by St. Louis Avenue. The western
border of the district is Rexford Drive and includes the buildings on the west side of the street.
The eastern boundary is Sixth Street and excludes the homes on the east side of this street.
Within these boundaries, three of the four Beverly Green tracts are included. We did not include
Beverly Green tract 2 because it differed architecturally and socially has become part of the El
Centro area to Beverly Greens immediate west.
The buildings in the district were built between 1952 and 1963 and include tracts 1, 3, and 4 of
the Beverly Green neighborhood. Tracts 1 and 3 were platted in 1951 and 1954, respectively, by
Federal Homes, which was owned by David Zenoff, Jerome Mack and other members of the
Mack family. Tract 1 includes homes north of Canosa Avenue between Beverly Way and Sixth
Street. Tract 3 comprises the majority of the Beverly Green district. It includes all of the multifamily buildings along Rexford as well as the single-family homes on Canosa Avenue and north
to Oakey Boulevard. Tract 4 was platted in 1959 by the Beverly Green Development
Corporation, with Melvin Moss as the owner. This tract is made up of homes on Bonita Avenue,
the north side of St. Louis Avenue, and homes between Beverly Way and Sixth Street that are
located south of Canosa Avenue.
Historic Integrity/Eligibility
With the exception of two single-family homes that were built in 1973 (1819 Beverly Way, 544
Oakey Blvd.), the development of Beverly Green places the period of significance at 1951 to
1964. According to the historic survey conducted by the City of Las Vegas, among the 124
homes and buildings in Beverly Green 45 were judged to be individually eligible for a National
Register listing, 51 are contributing, 26 are ineligible, and the 2 built in 1973 were not surveyed
because at the time of the survey they did not meet the age threshold for possible listing. Please
refer to section 4.3 of this survey that states the eligibility recommendations for Beverly Green.
All of the Beverly Green homes and buildings, are at least 40 years old, reflect the citys cultural
and social past, and are associated with events significant in local and state history. Not only
were the developers of the Beverly Green important in the early years of Las Vegas history, but
many of the architects who designed these homes were prolific in their work in our community.
In addition, Beverly Green marks an important point in the expansion of Las Vegas.
Las Vegas Development
A significant history of the development of Las Vegas is given in the Beverly Green survey and
inventory conducted in 2011 by Kautz Environmental Consultants for the City of Las Vegas. We
will provide a brief summary of the relevant information provided in the survey and inventory.
Prior to the late 1920s, population growth in the Las Vegas Valley was anything but rapid. There
was little water available, resulting in little growth (Mooney, 2002). However, the building of the
Hoover Dam brought increased construction and a surge in population. According to Mooney
(2002), between 1920 and 1930 the population in the Las Vegas Valley grew from 2,304 to
5,165. These numbers continued to increase with the population rising to 8,422 by the 1940
census.
World War II brought further growth. The military was looking to build inland bases and plants
to supply the war effort. It was thought that placing this infrastructure inland made it less
vulnerable to attack. In 1941, the Basic Magnesium and Army Air Gunnery Range were
completed. While there were jobs, there was a significant shortage in housing. The Federal
Housing Administration enabled the mass building of homes in order to help meet the needs of
the growing Las Vegas population.
By the 1950s, the population of Las Vegas had exploded to 24,624. And Las Vegas was looking
for further growth opportunities to not only create more jobs but also to bring in tourists. With
general economic prosperity, increased defense spending, and the proliferation of casinos, there
was an even greater demand for housing units, especially ones that were economical and
profitable. The lack of development policies, and increase property values no doubt contributed
to the increase in speculative building. During the 1950s and early 1960s, construction of singleand multi-family residential buildings spread (Kautz, 2011:17).
The development of much of Las Vegas was significantly influenced by the G.I. Bills home size
requirements. While the homes in Beverly Green did meet these requirements, according to
Harmon et al. (2009) many buyers opted for conventional mortgages rather than federal
programs. Yet, many subdivisions built at this time, including Beverly Green, conformed to
street layouts, setbacks and other requirements put in place by the FHA.
Major Architects & Architectural Styles
Architecture in Las Vegas during this era was significantly influenced by California Modernism.
Many developers during this era were looking for architects who could build in this medium. In
Beverly Green, these developers included Labby Construction and Development, Irwin Molasky,
Melvin Moss, Tee Construction, several members of the Mack family, and many others (Kautz,
2011).
Architecturally, the California Modern style express [sic] the carefree consumerism
trend of the postwar period. The typical suburban home gradually became larger,
expanding on the Ranch style while becoming lower with a distinct horizontality,
incorporating a more contemporary design element. Several of the multi-family
buildings in the area followed the International Style, which reflects a more austere mode
of Modernist architecture that had its origins in post-World War I Europe for workers
housing. (Kautz, 2011:17)
Beverly Green exhibits a significant diversity of architectural styles. While the Ranch style
dominates the home designs, other styles of architecture are present. The multi-family buildings
along Rexford are mainly in the International style, with flat roofs and little ornamentation.
Among the single family homes, there are some more modernist homes with low-sloping (e.g.
544 Canosa) and asymmetrical rooflines (e.g. 549 Canosa). Lastly, a sub-type of the Ranch style
is the Cinderella or Storybook ranch of which there are a couple of Beverly Green (e.g. 546
Barbara). For a less than large neighborhood, Beverly Green contains a broad range of home
styles that are characteristic of this period of Las Vegas history. For your reference, Kautz (2011)
contains photos of many of these homes throughout the survey.
Unsurprisingly, this diversity of home/building styles was due to Tracts 1 and 3 of the Beverly
Green tracts containing all custom homes, designed predominantly by architects known locally
or regionally. Among these were Don Van Camp, Hugh E. Taylor, Jack Knighton, Jim
McDaniel, and Jack Belcher. The most prolific architect in the three Beverly Green tracts was
Don Van Camp, having designed 16 of the Beverly Green homes. However, there is little known
about Mr. Van Camp's work in Las Vegas or elsewhere.
Hugh E. Taylor designed 7 Beverly Green homes. Educated at the University of Southern
California, he began his career in Los Angeles. Mr. Taylor is best known for his design of the
Desert Inn Casino and many of the Desert Inn Estate homes, including the Morelli House. He
lived in Las Vegas until his death in October 2015 and designed homes and buildings through the
late 1980s. While the majority of his work was residential, including the original portion of
Paradise Palms (Larime, 2015), much of Southridge, and many homes in Rancho Circle (Hess,
2007), he also designed Sunrise Hospital and the Country Club Towers (Kautz, 2011).
Jim McDaniel, Jack Knighton, and Jack Belcher all designed homes in Beverly Green, though in
smaller numbers than Mr. Van Camp and Mr. Taylor. One notable Jack Belcher home is located
at 548 Barbara Way, as it has retained the rare tropicool roof and other distinctive features.
The development of tract 4 took a different approach. Developed by Melvin Moss's Beverly
Green Development Company, he hired architect David Freedman to design the 22 homes that
make up the majority of tract that was called Beverly Green Estate Homes. These homes are
located on the south side of Bonita and north side of St. Louis Avenue. There are also four
homes on Beverly Way (1909-1921). There were three models: the Contemperama, the Villa and
the Nottingham. In order to give this development a more diverse look, these three models had
nine distinctive exteriors. Mr. Freedman, a California educated and based architect, specialized
in tract-home design. He designed many such neighborhoods in places like Long Beach, Buena
Park, and Sunland in California. He was among the top 15 architects chosen to design some
Sherman Woods custom homes (Kautz, 2011). Mr. Freedman lived in California until his death
in 1999.
Don Van Camp was also employed to design homes along the north side of Bonita. Round Up
Realty owned these lots and hired Mr. Van Camp. Owned by a brother and sister group
Murray, Faye, and Dean Petersen, they moved to Las Vegas from Utah in 1954 to avoid a tax
evasion charge and start anew. They were best known in Las Vegas realty for their creative
financing, including a scheme called house-swapping (Kautz, 2011:47) that allowed potential
buyers to use their current homes equity as a down payment on a Round Up Realty home.
According to Kautz, at their height the Petersen family business accounted for 63% of the Las
Vegas real estate market.
Significant Beverly Green Residents
"Las Vegas' Finest Residential Area"
"...perfect location for perfect living. Near town near fun near everything!
Only 3 blocks from schools shopping -- 'the Strip'"
(Las Vegas Review Journal, 1960)
When Beverly Green was first developed, it catered to many of the well-to-do in Las Vegas.
Liberace himself owned several apartments in the Beverly Rexford (1800 1818 Rexford Drive)
and his mother owned one in the Rexford (1700 Rexford Drive). As with much of urban Las
Vegas, Beverly Green saw a period of change starting in the 1980s. The demographics of the
neighborhood shifted, including a drop in socioeconomics. Some of the homes fell into disrepair.
Over the past decade there has been a slow return of homeowners who care for their homes and a
resurgence in neighborhood involvement. Today, Beverly Green is home to a diverse population.
Residents' occupations range from lawyers, retirees, casino workers, and a state legislator to
Strip entertainers and artists. There are significant Hispanic and white populations and a fewer
number of African American residents. The majority of the homes are owner occupied,
indicating that this neighborhood may be returning to a more stable period.
There were many well-known, though few famous, early residents of Beverly Green. On Barbara
Way, there was Elmo Ellsworth (at 544 & inspiration for Vegas Vic sign), Ted & Ann Otis (later
544 & of Otis elevator company), Rose & Louis Molasky (546), former City Councilman
Wendell Bunker (559), and Louis Prima and Kiely Smith (554). The Mindens of Minden
Jewelers lived at 548 Bonita and Vice President of Southwest Gas, Max Nauman, lived at 556
Bonita. Other notable residents include Frank Schivo, Dean and Elaine Shendal (Elaine still
resides in her home), Parry Thomas, and Hank and Joann Henry. There were many pit bosses
and business owners as well as bank executives and local politicians.
Over the more than fifty years of Beverly Green history there has been a shift in demographics
but today with the resurgence in downtown living, Beverly Green seems to be returning to the
stability it once had but has become a more diverse community than it was originally.
Conclusions
During the period of significance, 1951 1964, Beverly Green was becoming what would be
considered one of Las Vegas' premier residential areas. The homes, ranging from 1,200 to 2,000
square feet and selling for $12,000 - $20,000 (Kautz, 2011), exemplify some of the architecture
that is characteristic of this era. Many of the single-family homes are in the ranch style, with
some showing Modernist and International Style influences. Drawing from California
Modernism, Beverly Green homes are excellent examples of local and regional architectural
trends. In addition to the significant architecture of this proposed district, many prominent people
made their home in Beverly Green. Taking the architecture and residents together, Beverly
Green is an excellent example of how Las Vegas expanded and the types of architecture that
were characteristic of this era.
References
1960. Introducing Nevadas First Homes in the Great Builder Series: Beverly Green Estate
Homes. Las Vegas Review Journal, 7 February 1960.
Harmon, M.R., J.R. Breitling, T. Morley, and James McCarty. 2009. The Alta Vista Acres and
Oakridge Tracts: Phase I Survey and Inventory of the Southridge Neighborhood, Las
Vegas, Clark County, Nevada. Prepared for the City of Las Vegas.
Hess, Alan. 2008. A New Architecture for a New City. In The Morelli House: A Preservation
Project of the Junior League of Las Vegas. The Junior League of Las Vegas.
Kautz Environmental Consulting. 2011. The South Fifth Street, El Centro, and Beverly Green
Tracts: Phase 1 Beverly Green Neighborhood Survey and Inventory, Las Vegas, Clark
County, Nevada. Prepared for the City of Las Vegas.
Larime, Michelle. 2015. Hugh E. Taylor: Las Vegas Mid-Century Architect. On file at the State
Historic Preservation Office.
Mooney, Courtney. 2002. John S. Park Historic District, Las Vegas, Clark County, Nevada.
National Register of Historic Places Nomination. On file at the State Historic
Preservation Office.
Agenda Item No.: 6
SUPPORT
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
Street Name
Barbara Way
Barbara Way
Barbara Way
Barbara Way
Barbara Way
Barbara Way
Barbara Way
Barbara Way
Barbara Way
Barbara Way
Barbara Way
Barbara Way
Barbara Way
Beverly Way
Beverly Way
Beverly Way
Beverly Way
Beverly Way
Beverly Way
Beverly Way
Beverly Way
Beverly Way
Beverly Way
Bonita Avenue
Bonita Avenue
Bonita Avenue
Bonita Avenue
Bonita Avenue
Bonita Avenue
Bonita Avenue
Bonita Avenue
Bonita Avenue
Bonita Avenue
Bonita Avenue
Canosa Avenue
Canosa Avenue
Canosa Avenue
Canosa Avenue
Canosa Avenue
Canosa Avenue
House
Number
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
557
558
559
1705
1711
1805
1807
1815
1819
1901
1921
1917
1925
544
545
548
552
556
557
568
569
572
573
577
544
545
546
548
550
554
Last Name 1
Duro
Drumm
Swank
Rosales
Delikanakis
Ramirez
Havey
Harris
Rude
Beck
Shetler
Schlien
Saunders
Bovenizer
Morey
Mark
Schultz
DeGrandis
Perlman
Frank
Lopez
Villanueva
Rubio
Monahan
Smith
Ryan
Griffith
Libbon
Cornthwaite
Naumann
Kilmer
Schmitt
Ryder
Knapp
Swank
Walsh
Ceffalio
Reid
Prowell
Amora
First Name 1
Michael
Jennifer
Scott
Angelica
John
Guillermo
Richard
Richard
Jan Leslie
Harold
Michael
David
Dennis
John
Adam Rogers
Anthony
William
Loretta
Joyce
J.
Lilia
Rodolfo
Jesus
Mike
Summer
John
Sharon
Robert
Sharon
Alexander
Gary
John David
Kirk
George
Scott
Kevin
Carol
Richard
Grover Harry
Matiana
Last Name 2
First Name 2
Swank
Heidi
Havey
Geraldine
McGeorge LLC
Kveck
Wendy
Saunders
Petra
Mark
Bruno
Rubio
Monahan
Smith
Ryan
Griffith
Gilbert
Lilia
Ann
Michael
Vivian
Don
Gail
Moreau
Mark
Swank
Heidi
Paul
Claire
Lauren Earl
Benita
Joseph
Jerry
Belem
555
556
559
546
548
550
560
549
561
565
1704
1706
1708
1710
1712
1718
1722
1916
1700
Nagy
McAllister
Elsrode
Villasenor
Salguerio
Crader
Perez
Even Flow
Investments LLC
Larime
Blanco
Moreno-Marquez
Diawatan
Fernandez
Potter
Rogers
Amial
Abadjian
Leslie
Leslie
Guillory
Guerra
Delpino
Mejia
Anderson
Gardner
Bradley
1814
561
1700
573
Tobias
Tobias
Kelesis
Katchen
Darrel
Darrel
Paula
Samuel
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
Canosa Avenue
Canosa Avenue
Canosa Avenue
Ellen Way
Ellen Way
Ellen Way
Ellen Way
555
556
569
546
551
552
554
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
Ellen Way
Ellen Way
Ellen Way
Oakey Boulevard
Oakey Boulevard
Oakey Boulevard
Oakey Boulevard
St. Louis Avenue
St. Louis Avenue
St. Louis Avenue
Sixth Street
Sixth Street
Sixth Street
Sixth Street
Sixth Street
Sixth Street
Sixth Street
Sixth Street
Rexford Drive
1
2
3
4
OPPOSE
Beverly Way
Bonita Avenue
Sixth Street
St. Louis Avenue
Michelle
Miguel
Norberto
Rommel
Jose Rodrigo
Richard
Thorin
Arturo
Sossy
Jacob
Jacob
John Adam
Salvador
Sergio
Ana
Susan
Brian
Bonnie
Blanco
Rosa
Diawatan
Angelina
Guerra
Bertha
Gardner
Hartley
Brenda
Pam
7780 NORCANYON WY SAN DIEGO CA 92126-1160

545 BARBARA WY LAS VEGAS NV 89104-2857
5823 BARGULL BAY AVE LAS VEGAS NV 89131-2169
DRUMM JENNIFER LYNN
DURO MICHAEL A
E R S O F INC
549 BONITA AVE LAS VEGAS NV 89104-2803
DELANEY THOMAS A & CAROL
DIAWATAN ROMMEL S & ANGELINA A
1815 BEVERLY WAY LAS VEGAS NV 89104-2833
DEGRANDIS LORETTA F
548 BARBARA WAY LAS VEGAS NV 89104-2858
CRADER JERRY WILLIAM TRS 552 ELLEN WAY LAS VEGAS NV 89104-2860
CRADER JERRY TRUST
DELPINO GABRIELLE & SERGIO TRS 1712 S 6TH ST LAS VEGAS NV 89104-2837
ROJAS-GOMEZ MARIA 551 CANOSA AVE LAS VEGAS NV 89104-2812
CORREO-RAMIREZ ROMUALDO
DELPINO FAMILY TRUST
CORNTHWAITE SHARON & ARTHUR B
DELIKANAKIS JOHN
CHAVEZ AGATA TRS 1912 S 6TH ST LAS VEGAS NV 89104-2831
9428 BERKSHIRE LN VALLEJO CA 94591-3856
CABRERA MANAGEMNET L L C
9428 BERKSHIRE LN VALLEJO CA 94591-3856
CABRERA ABELARDO & E REV LIV TR
CHAVEZ AGATA LIVING TRUST
BOVENIZER JOHN
559 ELLEN WY LAS VEGAS NV 89104-2859
BLANCO MIGUEL & ROSA MARIA
BIAVA LUCILLE E TRS 1720 INDIAN SUMMER DR LAS VEGAS NV 89123-2456
BIAVA LUCILLE E REVOCABLE TRUST
MORALES ESPERANZA 18202 E HESPERO ST ROWLAND HEIGHTS CA 91748-3505
AYSON AUGUSTO & ELIZABETH
CEFFALIO PAUL G & CAROL C TRS 546 CANOSA AVE LAS VEGAS NV 89104-2813
AUSTIN-GEMAS BRIAN L
1912 S 6TH ST LAS VEGAS NV 89104
557 E ST LOUIS AVE LAS VEGAS NV 89104-2564
ARROYO GONZALO & IRENE
CHAVEZ AGATA
1722 S 6TH ST LAS VEGAS NV 89104-2837
ANDERSON SUSAN E
CEFFALIO PAUL G & CAROL C REV TR
2620 S MARYLAND PKWY BOX 623 LAS VEGAS NV 89125-0623
ALEXANDERS SVEINBJORG
554 CANOSA AVE LAS VEGAS NV 89104-2813
AVALOS LUIS MIGUEL 552 E OAKEY BLVD LAS VEGAS NV 89104-1442
ALBINO MARIA DEL PILAR NAVVOR
AMORA MATIANA
ABADJIAN SOSSY
16203314021
16203314030
16203314045
16203314064
16203316016
16203314032
16203315002
16203316009
16203314050
16203314026
16203315004
16203314018
16203315035
16203315036
16203316015
16203314015
16203314012
16203314011
16203316002
16203314054
16203315010
16203315006
16203314055
16203315022
16203316013
16203314019
16203315023
16203314059
16203314066
16203315024
16203314008
Parcel Numbe
16203314007
Printed On: Mon: June 13, 2016
AMIAL ARTURO & MARIA
A S Y S L L C 9108 COVERED WAGON AVE LAS VEGAS NV 89117
A S Y S L L C ETAL
Beverly Green District Owners
Address
A S Y S L L C 9108 COVERED WAGON AVE LAS VEGAS NV 89117
Case Number:
Owner
A S Y S L L C ETAL
Report of All Selected Parcels
1 of 5
GARDUQUE ANTHONY
LOPEZ LILIA I TRS 1921 BEVERLY WY LAS VEGAS NV 89104-2835

MAGNES MICHAEL TRS 448 S ARDEN BLVD LOS ANGELES CA 90020-4736
LOPEZ PAUL E & LILIA I FAMILY TR
MAGNES MICHAEL
MAGNES MICHAEL
MAGNES MICHAEL
3765 PAMA LN LAS VEGAS NV 89120-2916

LIBBON ROBERT P
LESLIE JOHN H & JACOB M
LEVIN LESLIE G & MICHELLE B
CAMTAN NGA 544 E OAKEY BLVD LAS VEGAS NV 89104-1442

556 ELLEN WAY LAS VEGAS NV 89104-2860
LARIME MICHELLE M
LESLIE JACOB M
KNOLLER RANDALL D
LAU LORETTA
MOREAU MARK 569 BONITA AVE LAS VEGAS NV 89104-2803

1029 EASTRIDGE WY LAS VEGAS NV 89110-2908
KAUPPINEN CHRISTINE M REV TR
KNAPP GEORGE
KAUPPINEN CHRISTINE TRS 111 KAHULUI BEACH RD #C411 KAHULUT HI 96732-1233
KATCHEN SAMUEL M
KILMER GARY T
LOPEZ ANDREA J 569 E ST LOUIS AVE LAS VEGAS NV 89104-2564

HERMAN EDA M

HAVEY RICHARD SR & GERALDINE TRS 550 BARBARA WY LAS VEGAS NV 89104-2858
HAVEY REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST
GUERRA SALVADOR & BERTHA A
GUILLORY JOHN A

GUERRA ANA
554 E OAKEY BLVD LAS VEGAS NV 89104-1442
GARDNER BRIAN C & BRENDA L
FRANK JOSHUA
GRIFFITH DON L & SHARON
1901 BEVERLY WAY LAS VEGAS NV 89104
FERNANDEZ JOSE RODRIGO
GILBERT BRUCE STEVEN
1821 LOCH LOMOND WAY LAS VEGAS NV 89102

FAVELA ERASMO
TESFAZION ALGANESH 1709 BEVERLY WY LAS VEGAS NV 89104-2832

10091 PARK RUN DR LAS VEGAS NV 89145
EVEN FLOW INVESTMENTS SERIES III
P O BOX 1380 BEVERLY HILLS CA 90213
E-RIO VENTURES LLC
ESTEFANOS HABTE
16203314003
16203314004
16203314005
16203315029
16203315015
16203314060
16203316020
16203316019
16203314062
16203314052
16203314028
16203315009
16203315007
16203314040
16203315026
16203315025
16203314033
16203316018
16203316017
16203314049
16203315016
16203315039
16203314067
16203315037
16203315033
16203314065
16203314068
16203314056
16203316004
16203314013
16203316011
Parcel Numbe
16203315003
ELSRODE LOREN E
Address
ECKERT RUBY MARGOT TRS 553 BONITA AVE LAS VEGAS NV 89104-2803
Case Number:
Owner
ECKERT RUBY MARGOT REV LIV TR
2 of 5
PEREZ KELLIE ANGEL 554 ELLEN WY LAS VEGAS NV 89104-2860

PERLMAN JOYCE TRS 850 TAM O SHANTER LAS VEGAS NV 89109-1453
PAYAN SAM
PEREZ ANGEL & BELEM
PERLMAN 1991 TRUST

1410 FREEMAN AVE LONG BEACH CA 90804
7322 S RAINBOW BLVD #180 LAS VEGAS NV 89139
RODRIGUEZ ANA K MEJIA
ROGERS THORIN
ROSALES ANGELICA R
ROZOLYO YIZHAQ
2555 W CHEYENNE AVE NORTH LAS VEGAS NV 89032

549 BARBARA WAY LAS VEGAS NV 89104
REID RICHARD P
REYES PATRICK & KERI
PROWELL GROVER TRUST
REXFORD INC

PROWELL GROVER H TRS 550 CANOSA AVE LAS VEGAS NV 89104-2813
PREECHAYOS SANAN
4465 S JONES BLVD LAS VEGAS NV 89103
2015 E COUGAR AVE LAS VEGAS NV 89123-2828
PATEL JITENDRA & JAYSHREE J
7361 HAWK SHADOW AVE LAS VEGAS NV 89113-0745
PPKLLC
POTTER RICHARD J
7424 ALICE SPRINGS CIR LAS VEGAS NV 89129
OLIVEROS MIGUEL SILVA
PETERSEN MELISSA 2012 SPEND THRI
19 HILLANDO DR SHREWSBURY MA 01545

1913 BEVERLY WY LAS VEGAS NV 89104-2835
NGUYEN THERESA

568 BONITA AVE LAS VEGAS NV 89104
NAUMANN ALEXANDER
MOREY ADAM R
NAGY PAUL E & KIMBERLIE L
546 E OAKEY BLVD LAS VEGAS NV 89104

1711 BEVERLY WAY LAS VEGAS NV 89104
MORENO-MARQUEZ NORBERTO
LAS VEGAS NV 89104
MCALLISTER CLAIRE
MONAHAN MICHAEL & ANN MARIE
MARTIN LETHA
P O BOX 94442 LAS VEGAS NV 89193
MARSCHNER JOHN D
WASHINGTON SONG MI 553 CANOSA AVE LAS VEGAS NV 89104-2812
MARK BRUNO F LIVING TRUST 6560 TARA LAS VEGAS NV 89146-5103
MARK ANTHONY B
MIERSWA MI K
P O BOX 19072 LAS VEGAS NV 89132-0072
MARCUS BARBARA
MCGEORGE I LLC
HARRIS RICHARD W 551 BARBARA WY LAS VEGAS NV 89104-2857
16203314023
16203314044
16203315020
16203316014
16203314043
16203314001
16203314016
16203314017
16203314069
16203316001
16203314036
16203316010
16203314051
16203315027
16203315021
16203316021
16203315031
16203314057
16203315012
16203314024
16203316005
16203314063
16203315018
16203314025
16203314041
16203314020
16203316003
16203314035
16203316006
16203316012
16203314042
Parcel Numbe
16203314006
MALEY PETER ARMSTRONG
Address
Case Number:
Owner
MAGNES MICHAEL
3 of 5

TOBIAS DARREL J TRS 1814 BEVERLY WY LAS VEGAS NV 89104-2834
GERMINO ANTHONY B 806 LIBERTY ST EL CERRITO CA 94530
RYAN JOHN P & VIVIAN CO-TRS 1570 BOZEMAN DR HENDERSON NV 89012-2419
1904 REXFORD DR LAS VEGAS NV 89104
1904 REXFORD DR LAS VEGAS NV 89104
VANDORMOLEN LUCILLE D TRUST 1920 S 6TH ST LAS VEGAS NV 89104-2831
10432 EASTBORN AVE #205 LOS ANGELES CA 90024
545 CANOSA AVE LAS VEGAS NV 89104
TOBIAS DARREL J REVOCABLE TRUST
TRUE KURT W
TUNQUEN TRUST
UCHIZONO FAMILY TRUST
UCHIZONO FAMILY TRUST
VALDES MARLENE BARZAGA
VANDORMOLEN ROBERT J TRUST
VEXFORD 1 L L C
VILLANUEVA RODOLFO
VILLASENOR BENITA C
WALSH KEVIN
WEGNER HART L & ALEXANDRA S
16203314027
16203314029
16203314047
16203315030
16203314002
16203315038
16203315032
16203314009
16203314010
16203315017
16203314053
16203314022
16203315005
16203315014
16203316008
16203315040
16203314031
16203314014
16203314046
16203315001
16203314037
16203314039
16203314048
16203316007
16203315011
16203314038
16203314058
16203314061
16203315008
16203315034
16203314034
Parcel Numbe
16203315028
TOBIAS DARREL J
14900 VENTURA BLVD #200 SHERMAN OAKS CA 91403-3471
TIPACTI LUIS ALEJANDRO
SWANK SCOTT & HEIDI

P O BOX 400938 LAS VEGAS NV 89140
546 BARBARA WAY LAS VEGAS NV 89104
SWANK SCOTT & HEIDI
SOTELO JACQUELIN
TECUANHUEHUE PEDRO H
545 BONITA AVE LAS VEGAS NV 89104
SMITH MICHAEL & SUMMER
T O V INVESTMENT 3 L L C
557 BARBARA WAY LAS VEGAS NV 89104-2857
SHENDAL ELAINE TRS 548 ELLEN WY LAS VEGAS NV 89104-2860
SHENDAL ELAINE FAMILY TRUST
P O BOX 3654 HOLLYWOOD CA 90078-3654
SCHULTZ WILLIAM D
SHLIEN DAVID J
SCHMITT JOHN D
SHETLER-KVECK FAMILY TRUST ETAL
SARDINA REGINA 7135 BABILONIA ST CARLSBAD CA 92009
245 FISCHER AVE #D-2 COSTA MESA CA 92626
S J C PROPERTIES L L C
RYDER KIRK
SAUNDERS PETRA M & DENNIS W
RUIZ MARCO A & TRINIDAD
SALGUEIRO JOSEPH A REVOCABLE TR
RUDE JAN L TRS 552 BARBARA WY LAS VEGAS NV 89104-2858
RUDE JAN L LIVING TRUST
Address
Case Number:
Owner
RUBIO JESUS & LILIA
4 of 5
11024 BALBOA BLVD #699 GRANADA HILLS CA 91344
YSODLLC
Address
Case Number:
Owner
WU SUNG CHENG & CHEN Y
16203315019
Parcel Numbe
16203315013
5 of 5
Agenda Item No.: 6
Legal Descriptions:
162-03-314-001
BEVERLY GREEN TRACT #3
PLAT BOOK 4 PAGE 20
LOT 1 BLOCK C
& LOTS 2,3
The portion of the Northeast Quarter (NE ) of the Southwest Quarter (SW ) ) of Section 03,
Township 21 South, Range 61 East, M.D.M., Lot 1, inclusive in Block C of Beverly Green
Tract No. 3, as shown by map thereof on file in Book 4 of Plats, Page 20 in the Office of the
County Recorder of Clark County, Nevada
162-03-316-021
PLAT BOOK 3 PAGE 19
LOT 22 BLOCK 1
The portion of the Northeast Quarter (NE ) of the Southwest Quarter (SW ) of Section 03,
Township 21 South, Range 61 East, M.D.M., Lot Twenty-two (22), Block one (1) of the Beverly
Green Tract No. 1, as shown by map thereof on file in Book 3 of Plats, Page 19 in the Office of
the County Recorder of Clark County, Nevada.
162-03-315-040
PLAT BOOK 5 PAGE 51
LOT 14 BLOCK 3
Township 21 South, Range 61 East, M.D.M., Lot Twenty-two (22), Block one (1) of Beverly
Green Tract No. 1, as shown by map thereof on file in Book 3 of Plats, Page 19 in the Office of
the County Recorder of Clark County, Nevada.
162-03-314-013
PLAT BOOK 4 PAGE 20
LOT 11 BLOCK D
& LOTS 12,13
Township 21 South, Range 61 East, M.D.M., Lots Eleven (11), Twelve (12) AND Thirteen (13)
In Block D of Beverly Green Tract No. 3, as shown by map thereof on file in Book 4 of Plats,
Page 20 in the Office of the County Recorder of Clark County, Nevada.
JUNE 22, 2016 HPC MEETING

ITEM
NUMBER
6
CASE
NUMBER
HPC-64622 (Beverly Green)
PROTEST/SUPPORT POSTCARDS
REVISED AGENDA ITEM SUPPORTING
DOCUMENTATION
(SUBMITTED AFTER FINAL AGENDA)
6/22/2016 8:21 AM

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
GPA-64838 - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: BOOS
DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC. - OWNER: NEVADA STATE BANK - For possible action on
a request for a General Plan Amendment FROM: O (OFFICE) TO: SC (SERVICE
COMMERCIAL) on 2.17 acres at the northwest corner of Cheyenne Avenue and Fort Apache
Road (APN 138-07-801-011), Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-64792]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
C.C.: 9/21/2016
261
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends APPROVAL
2. Staff Report - GPA-64792 and ZON-64839 [PRJ-64792]
4. Photo(s) - GPA-64792 and ZON-64839 [PRJ-64792]
5. Justification Letter - GPA-64792 and ZON-64839 [PRJ-64792]
6. Protest Letters and Protest/Support Postcards - GPA-64792 and ZON-64839 [PRJ-64792]
7. Protest Petition GPA-64838, ZON-64839, SUP-65273, SDR-65272 and TMP-65348 [PRJ64792]
GPA-64838, ZON-64839, SUP-65273, SDR-65272, and TMP-65348 [PRJ-64792]

DEPARTMENT:
PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: BOOS DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC. OWNER: NEVADA STATE BANK
CASE
NUMBER
GPA-64838
ZON-64839
SUP-65273
SDR-65272
TMP-65348
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends APPROVAL.
Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved subject to
conditions:
conditions:
REQUIRED FOR
APPROVAL
GPA-64838
GPA-64838
ZON-64839
GPA-64838
ZON-64839
SUP-65273
** NOTIFICATION **
34
NOTICES MAILED
437 GPA-64838 and ZON-64839

437 SUP-65273 and SDR-65272
437 TMP-65348
APPROVALS
1 GPA-64838 and ZON-64839

1 SUP-65273 and SDR-65272
1 TMP-65348
PROTESTS
261 GPA-64838 and ZON-64839

210 SUP-65273 and SDR-65272
210 TMP-65348
NE/CS

Conditions Page One
** CONDITIONS **
Planning
1.
Conformance to all Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.12 for an Auto Repair
Garage, Minor use.
2.
Approval of and conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Site Development Plan
Review (SDR-64886) shall be required.
3.
All repair and service work shall be performed within a completely enclosed building.
4.
All disabled vehicles shall be stored on a concrete or asphalt surface in an area which is
screened from view from the surrounding properties and adjoining streets, pursuant to
LVMC 19.08.040. Vehicles shall not be stored on the property longer than 45 days.
5.
6.
Safety.
7.
8.
SDR-65272 CONDITIONS
Planning
1.
Approval of and conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Special Use Permit (SUP65273) shall be required, if approved.
NE/CS

Conditions Page Two
2.
3.
All development shall be in conformance with the site plan and landscape plan date
stamped July 15, 2016; and building elevations date stamped July 18, 2016, except as
amended by conditions herein.
4.
A Waiver from Title 19.08 is hereby approved, to allow service bay doors to face the
public right-of-way where such is not allowed.
5.
A Waiver from Title 19.08 is hereby approved, to not orient the building to the corner
where such is required.
6.
All trash enclosures shall be constructed in accordance with Title 19.08.
7.
All mechanical and electrical equipment shall be screened in accordance with Title 19.08.
8.
Safety.
9.
for building permit.
10.
A technical landscape plan, signed and sealed by a Registered Architect, Landscape

Architect, Residential Designer or Civil Engineer, must be submitted prior to or at the same
time application is made for a building permit. A permanent underground sprinkler system
is required, and shall be permanently maintained in a satisfactory manner; the landscape
plan shall include irrigation specifications. Installed landscaping shall not impede visibility
of any traffic control device.
11.
A fully operational fire protection system, including fire apparatus roads, fire hydrants and
water supply, shall be installed and shall be functioning prior to construction of any
combustible structures.
12.
Prior to the submittal of a building permit application, the applicant shall meet with
Department of Planning staff to develop a comprehensive address plan for the subject site.
A copy of the approved address plan shall be submitted with any future building permit
applications related to the site.
13.
All City Code requirements and design standards of all City Departments must be satisfied,
NE/CS

Conditions Page Three
Public Works
14.
Dedicate the area necessary for a dedicated right turn lane/bus turnout meeting the intent
of Standard Drawing 234.4 on Cheyenne Avenue into this site prior to the approval
of
construction documents for this site or concurrent with the recordation of a Map for this
site, whichever may occur first. Additionally grant a 5-foot Pedestrian
Access
Easement along Cheyenne Avenue prior to the issuance of permits for this site.
15.
Construct all incomplete half-street improvements on Cheyenne Avenue and Fort Apache
Road adjacent to this site meeting Complete Street standards concurrent with development
of this site. Additionally, reconstruct the raised median island, as approved by the City
Traffic Engineer, in Fort Apache Road concurrent with on-site development activities. All
existing paving damaged or removed by this development shall be restored at its original
location and to its original width concurrent with development of this site.
16.
The Developer of this site shall construct median island improvements on Fort Apache
Road to prohibit lefts out at the northern driveway onto Fort Apache Road. Median island
geometric design shall be approved by the Traffic Engineering Section of the Department
of Public Works.
17.
Landscape and maintain all unimproved rights-of-way on Cheyenne Avenue and Fort
Apache Road adjacent to this site. All private improvements and landscaping installed
with this project shall be situated and maintained so as to not create sight visibility
obstructions for vehicular traffic at all development access drives and abutting street
intersections.
18.
Submit an Encroachment Agreement for landscaping and private improvements in the

Cheyenne Avenue and Fort Apache Road public rights-of-way, if any, prior to the issuance
of permits for these improvements. The applicant must carry an insurance policy for the
term of the Encroachment Agreement and add the City of Las Vegas as an additionally
insured entity on this insurance policy. If requested by the City, the applicant shall remove
property encroaching in the public right-of-way at the applicant's expense pursuant to the
terms of the City's Encroachment Agreement. The installation and maintenance of all
private improvements in the public right of way shall be the responsibility of the applicant
and any successors in interest to the property and assigns pursuant to the terms of the
Encroachment Agreement. Coordinate all requirements for the Encroachment Agreement
with the Land Development Section of the Department of Building and Safety (229-4836).
19.
A Traffic Impact Analysis must be submitted to and approved by the Department of Public
Works prior to the issuance of any building or grading permits, or the submittal of any
construction drawings. Comply with the recommendations of the approved Traffic Impact
Analysis prior to occupancy of the site. The City shall determine area traffic mitigation
contribution requirements based upon information provided in the approved Traffic Impact
Analysis; such monies shall be contributed prior to the issuance of any permits for this site.
NE/CS

Conditions Page Four
The Traffic Impact Analysis shall also include a section addressing Standard Drawings
#234.1 #234.2 and #234.3 to determine additional right-of-way requirements for bus
turnouts adjacent to this site, if any; dedicate all areas recommended by the approved
Traffic Impact Analysis. All additional rights of way required by Standard Drawing #201.1
for exclusive right turn lanes and dual left turn lanes shall be dedicated prior to or
concurrent with the commencement of on site development activities unless specifically
noted as not required in the approved Traffic Impact Analysis. If additional rights of way
are not required and Traffic Control devices are or may be proposed at this site outside of
the public right of way, all necessary easements for the location and/or access of such
devices shall be granted prior to the issuance of permits for this site. Phased compliance
will be allowed if recommended by the approved Traffic Impact Analysis. No
recommendation of the approved Traffic Impact Analysis, nor compliance therewith, shall
be deemed to modify or eliminate any condition of approval imposed by the Planning
Commission or the City Council on the development of this site.
20.
A Drainage Plan and Technical Drainage Study must be submitted to and approved by the
Department of Public Works prior to the issuance of any building or grading permits,
submittal of any construction drawings or the recordation of a Map subdividing this site,
whichever may occur first. Provide and improve all drainage ways recommended in the
approved drainage plan/study. The developer of this site shall be responsible to construct
such neighborhood or local drainage facility improvements as are recommended by the
City of Las Vegas Neighborhood Drainage Studies and approved Drainage Plan/Study
concurrent with development of this site.
TMP-65348 CONDITIONS
Planning
1.
Approval of the Tentative Map shall be for no more than four (4) years. If a Final Map is
not recorded on all or a portion of the area embraced by the Tentative Map within four (4)
years of the approval of the Tentative Map, this action is void.
2.
3.
The Final Map shall contain a note granting perpetual common access and parking across
the entire subdivision.
4.
All development is subject to the conditions of City Departments and State Subdivision
Statutes.
NE/CS

Conditions Page Five
Public Works
5.
Dedicate the area necessary for a dedicated right turn lane/bus turnout meeting the intent of
Standard Drawing 234.4 on Cheyenne Avenue into this site with the recordation of a Final
Map for this site. Additionally grant a 5-foot Pedestrian Access Easement along Cheyenne
Avenue on the Final Map for this site.
6.
Construct all incomplete half-street improvements on Cheyenne Avenue and Fort Apache
Road adjacent to this site meeting Complete Street standards concurrent with development
of this site. Additionally, reconstruct the raised median island, as approved by the City
Traffic Engineer, in Fort Apache Road concurrent with on-site development activities. All
location and to its original width concurrent with development of this site.
7.
Per Title 19.16.060.W.1, provide a note on the Final Map that states "All parcels created
through this map shall have perpetual unobstructed access to all driveways servicing the
overall subdivision unless incompatible uses can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the
City Engineer."
8.
The onsite sewer shall be private and per Title 19.16.060.W. 2, sewer service for this
commercial subdivision shall be shown in accordance with one of the following two
alternatives, and the appropriate note shall appear on the face of the recorded Final Map:
I.
On-site sewers are a common element privately owned and maintained
per the
Conditions, Covenants, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) of this
commercial
subdivision.
II. On-site sewers are a common element privately owned and maintained per the Joint
Use Agreement of this commercial subdivision.
9.
Per Title 19.16.060.W.3, provide a note on the Final Map that states "All subdivided lots
within this Final Map shall provide perpetual inter-lot drainage rights across all existing
and future parcel limits."
10.
Department of Public Works prior to the recordation of a Final Map for this site. Provide
and improve all drainage ways recommended in the approved drainage plan/study. The
developer of this site shall be responsible to construct such neighborhood or local drainage
facility improvements as are recommended by the City of Las Vegas Neighborhood
Drainage Studies and approved Drainage Plan/Study concurrent with development of this
site. The Drainage Study required by SDR-65272 may be used to satisfy this condition.
11.
Prior to the recordation of the Final Map, all requirements must be complied with or such
future compliance must be guaranteed by an approved performance security method(s) in
accordance with Unified Development Code sections 19.02.130.C and 19.02.130.E.
NE/CS

Conditions Page Six
12.
The approval of all Public Works related improvements shown on this Tentative Map is in
concept only. Specific design and construction details relating to size, type and/or
alignment of improvements, including but not limited to street, sewer and drainage
improvements, shall be resolved prior to approval of the construction plans by the City. No
additional deviations from adopted City Standards shall be allowed unless specific written
approval for such is received from the City Engineer prior to the recordation of a Final Map
or the approval of subdivision related construction plans, whichever may occur first.
Approval of this Tentative Map does not constitute approval of any deviations. If such
approval cannot be obtained, a revised Tentative Map must be submitted showing
elimination of such deviations.
NE/CS

** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is requesting to amend the General Plan designation and rezone an undeveloped
2.17 acre lot on the northwest corner of Cheyenne Avenue and Fort Apache Road in order to
develop a one-lot commercial subdivision. The proposed development includes an 8,500 squarefoot General Retail Store, Other Than Listed, a 2,418 square-foot Restaurant with Drive
Through, and a 3,115 square-foot Auto Repair Garage, Minor.
ISSUES
A Special Use Permit is required for an Auto Repair Garage, Minor in the C-1 (Limited
Commercial) zone.
A Waiver is required to allow for the service bays to face the public right-of-way where such
is not allowed.
A Waiver is required to allow the buildings on corner lots to not be oriented to the corner and
to the street fronts where such is required.
ANALYSIS
The subject site is located in the Northwest Sector of the General Plan and has a current General
Plan designation of O (Office). The applicant has requested to amend this designation to SC
(Service Commercial). In addition, the applicant is also requesting to rezone the subject site from
O (Office) to C-1 (Limited Commercial). The Service Commercial category allows low to
medium intensity retail, office, or other commercial uses that serve primarily local area patrons
and that do not include more intense general commercial characteristics. Examples include
neighborhood shopping centers, theaters, and other places of public assembly and public and
semi-public uses. This category also includes offices either singly or grouped as office centers
with professional and business services. The Service Commercial category may also allow
mixed-use development with a residential component where appropriate. The proposed Service
Commercial General Plan designation is compatible with the existing Multi-Family Residential
land use to the west, and the existing Office, Other Than Listed land use to the north.
Due to the location of the subject property at the intersection of two Primary Arterials, staff finds
the requested General Plan Amendment and rezoning to be appropriate and compatible with the
surrounding area and is recommending approval of both applications. If denied, the subject site
will maintain the O (Office) General Plan Designation and O (Office) zoning designation and the
proposed commercial development will not be permitted.
NE/CS

In addition to the General Plan Amendment and the Rezoning requests, the applicant has
proposed to develop a one-lot commercial subdivision which will consist of an 8,500 squarefoot General Retail Store, Other than Listed, a 2,418 square-foot Restaurant with Drive Through
and a 3,115 square-foot Auto Repair Garage, Minor. The proposed location of the Auto Repair
Garage, Minor, requires a Waiver to allow the service bays to face the public right-of-way; with
the proposed location of the Restaurant with Drive Through also requiring a Waiver, as buildings
on corner lots are required to be oriented to the corner and to the street fronts, and to make a
strong tie with the building lines of each street frontage. The applicant has not demonstrated
substantial and/or convincing evidence that the subject site does not allow for alternative
building configurations to aid in the service bays being inconspicuous from the direct line of
sight from the public right-of-way, and the Restaurant with Drive Through not able to be
oriented to the corner. For example, the General Retail building could be oriented to the corner,
with the Restaurant with Drive Through located along a street frontage and the Auto Repair
Garage, Minor located to the rear of the site allowing for the service bays to be shielded from
view of the public right-of-way.
Staff finds that the subject site is adequate in size to allow for the applicant to rearrange the
configuration of the buildings in order to avoid the need for the requested waivers, and that an
alternative site plan design would allow for the proposed one-lot commercial subdivision to meet
these requirements set forth by Title 19. For these reasons, staff is recommending denial of both
the Site Development Plan Review (SDR-65272) and the associated Special Use Permit (SUP65273) applications.
The requested Special Use Permit is required by Title 19.12 to allow for an Auto Repair Garage,
Minor use within a C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning district. Title 19 defines an Auto Repair
Garage, Minor as:
A facility for the performance of minor repairs and service on vehicles of 10,000 pounds
gross vehicle weight or less. Such repairs and service are limited to electronic tune ups,
brake repairs (including drum turning), air conditioning repairs, generator and starter
repairs, tire repairs, front end alignments, battery recharging, lubrication,
selling/installing minor parts and accessories, and other similar activities. The term also
includes the repair and installation of other minor elements of an automobile such as
windshield wipers, hoses, windows, etc., but excludes general engine repairs, engine
installation, and the repair and installation of transmissions and differentials.
Staff supports the proposed Auto Repair Garage, Minor land use, but is unable to support the
requested Waiver to allow for the service bays to face the public right-of-way and is
recommending denial of this request. An alternative site design could eliminate the requested
Waiver, or at least mitigate the request by shielding the service bays with other buildings.
NE/CS

Building elevations proposed for the General Retail building demonstrates typical retail lease space
potentially accommodating up to seven different small businesses or as few as one large tenant. The
number of tenants will be determined as leasable space is acquired by future tenants, with the
interior tenant improvements being completed as the space is leased. The exterior finish of the
building includes a stucco finish with stone veneer accents. Concern was raised by the neighbors to
the west about errant light from signage disturbing their sleep during the night hours. A Condition
of Approval has been added to prevent signage from being installed on the western faade of the
8,500 square-foot General Retail Building.
The proposed Restaurant with Drive Through building elevations demonstrate a typically fastfood type restaurant model with decorative metal canopies and stone veneer accented facades. The
building placement did not meet the minimum requirements set forth by Title 19.08 requiring the
building to be oriented to the corner. A Waiver has been requested to waive this requirement to
allow for the drive through lane to circulate around the building. For this reason, staff has
recommended denial of the Site Development Plan Review.
Signage that has been depicted on the elevations is not part of this review and will be reviewed
separately during the sign permit application process.
The proposed tentative map demonstrates a one-lot commercial subdivision that allows for
shared parking among the proposed building structures and associated land uses within the
subject site. Staff recommends approval of this request. Public Works noted that the north/south
cross section shows a slope less than 2% and no retaining walls are proposed. The east/west
cross section shows an average slope greater than 2% and a maximum 4-foot retaining wall is
shown on the east property line.
FINDINGS (GPA-64838)
Section 19.16.030(I) of the Las Vegas Zoning Code requires that the following conditions be met
in order to justify a General Plan Amendment:
1.
The density and intensity of the proposed General Plan Amendment is compatible
with the existing adjacent land use designations,
The proposed SC (Service Commercial) General Plan designation is compatible with the
existing O (Office) General Plan designation to the north and the MLA (Medium Low
Attached Residential Density) General Plan designation to the west.
2.
The zoning designations allowed by the proposed amendment will be compatible with
the existing adjacent land uses or zoning districts,
NE/CS

The proposed SC (Service Commercial) General Plan designation allows for the P-O
(Professional Office), O (Office), and C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning districts. All of
which are compatible with the existing adjacent land uses and zoning districts.
3.
There are adequate transportation, recreation, utility, and other facilities to

accommodate the uses and densities permitted by the proposed General Plan
Amendment; and
The surrounding area is completely developed with all infrastructure and utilities in place.
In addition, both Cheyenne Avenue and Fort Apache Road are designated as 100-foot
Primary Arterials by the Master Plan of Streets and Highways and are adequate in size to
provide sufficient access to the subject site.
4.
The proposed amendment conforms to other applicable adopted plans and policies
that include approved neighborhood plans.
As part of the Centennial Hills Sector Plan Area, these applications support the goals of
the Centennial Hills Sector Land Use Plan by encouraging the use of vacant land
adjacent to developed land in order to efficiently use infrastructure and protect
undeveloped land or spaces from premature development.
FINDINGS (ZON-64839)
In order to approve a Rezoning application, pursuant to Title 19.16.090(L), the Planning
Commission or City Council must affirm the following:
1.
The proposal conforms to the General Plan.

With approval of the proposed General Plan Amendment to the SC (Service Commercial)
designation, the proposed rezoning of the subject site to C-1 (Limited Commercial) would
conform to the Citys General Plan.
2.
The uses which would be allowed on the subject property by approving the rezoning
will be compatible with the surrounding land uses and zoning districts.
The C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning district is intended for the periphery of residential
neighborhoods and for intersections of primary and secondary thoroughfares. Rezoning the
subject site to C-1 (Limited Commercial) would allow for retail shopping, restaurants and
personal services, which would be compatible with the surrounding land uses and zoning
districts.
NE/CS

3.
Growth and development factors in the community indicate the need for or
appropriateness of the rezoning.
The undeveloped property is appropriate for commercial development, as it is surrounded
by Multi-Family Residences, Offices, and other commercial uses such as Restaurants and
General Retail.
4.
size to meet the requirements of the proposed zoning district.
The subject site is located on the northwest corner of Cheyenne Avenue and Fort Apache
Road. Both thoroughfares are designated as 100-foot Primary Arterials by the Master Plan
of Streets and Highways and are adequate in size to provide sufficient access to the subject
site.
1.
Dependent upon the approval of the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezoning
applications, the proposed General Retail Store, Other Than Listed and Restaurant with
Drive Through would be in conformance with the Las Vegas 2020 Master Plan if
approved, and would be compatible with the existing Office use to the north and the
existing Multi-Family Residential to the west.
2.
The subject site is a proposed one-lot commercial subdivision that will include a General
Retail Store, Other than Listed; a Restaurant with Drive Through; and an Auto Repair
Garage, Minor. The site is approximately 2.17 acres, and allows for adequate parking and
site circulation and access.
3.
NE/CS

This site has direct access from Cheyenne Avenue and Fort Apache Road which are both
100-foot wide primary arterial streets. Arterial roads are designed to handle the traffic
generated by commercial establishments such as the proposed Restaurant with Drive
Through.
4.
General Plan.
The proposed general plan designation of SC (Service Commercial) supports the requested
Rezoning from O (Office) to C-1 (Limited Commercial). An Auto Repair Garage, Minor
requires a Special Use Permit in the C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning district. Staff has
recommended denial of the requested Special Use Permit due to the associated Waiver
requested to allow for the service bay doors to face the public right-of-way.
5.
The requested Auto Repair Garage, Minor land use requires a Special Use Permit in order
to operate within the C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning district. While there are no
Minimum Special Use Permit Requirements in Title 19.12for the proposed land use, the
proposed structure does not meet the minimum design requirements set forth by Title
19.08 and requires a Waiver to allow the service bay doors to face the public right-of-way.
For this reason, staff has recommended denial of the Special Use Permit application.
FINDINGS (SDR-65272)
In order to approve a Site Development Plan Review application, per Title 19.16.100(E) the
Planning Commission and/or City Council must affirm the following:
1.
The proposed development is compatible with adjacent development and

development in the area;
The proposed commercial development is located on the northwest corner of Cheyenne
Avenue and Fort Apache Road, adjacent to two, 100-foot Primary Arterials. In addition the
subject site is adjacent to an existing Office development to the north, and a Multi-Family
Residential development (Condominiums) to the west. The existing Office development
and Multi-Family Residential provide adequate buffering to the existing detached single
family residences in the area and is compatible with adjacent development in the area.
2.
The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan, this Title, the Design
Standards Manual, the Landscape, Wall and Buffer Standards, and other dulyadopted city plans, policies and standards;
NE/CS

If approved, the proposed development will be consistent with the proposed General Plan
Amendment of SC (Service Commercial). In addition, the proposed development has met
all minimum development standards set forth by Title 19 for landscape buffers, parking
requirements, and building setbacks. The proposed project did not meet the requirements
for buildings on corner lots to be oriented to the corner, and for service bays to not face the
public right-of-way, and a Waiver has been requested for each requirement. Staff does not
support these Waiver requests.
3.
Site access and circulation do not negatively impact adjacent roadways or

neighborhood traffic;
This site has direct access from Cheyenne Avenue and Fort Apache Road which are both
100-foot wide primary arterial streets. Arterial roads are designed to handle the traffic
generated by commercial establishments such as the proposed one-lot commercial
subdivision.
4.
Building and landscape materials are appropriate for the area and for the City;
Stucco with stone veneers has been proposed for the building finishes, with Mexican Palo
Verde trees and Yellow Rabbit Brush shrubs being proposed for landscape materials. All
of which are commonly used building and landscape materials here in the City, and are
appropriate for a desert climate.
5.
Building elevations, design characteristics and other architectural and aesthetic

features are not unsightly, undesirable, or obnoxious in appearance; create an
orderly and aesthetically pleasing environment; and are harmonious and compatible
with development in the area;
While the building elevations are not obnoxious or unsightly, by positioning the Drive
Through to orient to the corner instead of the building itself, and having service bay doors
face the public right-of-way along Fort Apache Road, two Waivers are now necessary for
the proposed project. By reconfiguring the site, the Waivers could have been avoided.
6.
Appropriate measures are taken to secure and protect the public health, safety and
general welfare.
The proposed commercial development will be subject to plan check reviews during the
building permit review process, and physical site inspections during the construction
phase of the proposed project. Additionally, the proposed land uses are also subject to
periodic reviews and inspections by the Business Licensing division of Planning and
the Clark County Health District.
NE/CS

The City Council approved a request to amend a portion of the Centennial
Hills Inter local Land Use Plan of the General Plan from ML (Medium-Low
Density Residential) to O (Office) on 3.88 acres adjacent to the northwest
corner of Cheyenne Avenue and Fort Apache Road. Staff and the Planning
Commission recommended approval.
05/19/04
The City Council approved a request for a Rezoning from U (Undeveloped)
[ML (Medium Low Density Residential) General Plan Designation] to O
(Office) on 3.00 acres adjacent to the northwest corner of Cheyenne Avenue
and Fort Apache Road. Staff and the Planning Commission recommended
approval.
The City Council approved a Petition to Vacate U.S. Government Patent
10/06/04
Reservations generally located north of Cheyenne Avenue, west of Fort
Apache Road. Staff and the Planning Commission recommended approval.
Due to a notification error this item was not acted upon as a part of the
07/12/16
07/12/16 Planning Commission meeting and has been scheduled for a Special
Planning Commission meeting date.

08/10/04

There are no related building permits or business licenses for the subject site.
Staff conducted a pre-application conference where the submittal
05/25/16
requirements for a General Plan Amendment and Rezoning were discussed
via email and telephone.
Staff conducted a pre-application conference where the submittal
06/21/16
requirements for a Special Use Permit, Site Development Plan Review, and a
Tentative Map where discussed.
NE/CS

Staff Report Page Nine
A neighborhood meeting was held on July 7, 2016 at 6:00 p.m. at the
Rainbow Library located at 3150 North Buffalo Drive.
Meeting Start Time: 6:10 p.m.
Meeting End Time: 7:30 p.m.
Attendance:
07/07/16
5 Representatives for the Applicant/Owner

1 Representative from the Planning Department
1 Representative from Councilman Stavros Anthonys
Office (Ward 4)
Approximately 47 Members of the public (neighbors)
were in attendance.
The applicant and their representatives presented some conceptual drawings

that included a site plan that demonstrated a restaurant with drive-through
(Del Taco), a retail building (tenant unknown at this time), and a minor auto
repair service (Jiffy Lube) to be built on the subject site. Jiffy Lube and Del
Taco have signed leases pending approval of these applications, and the
applicant is currently searching for a single, national chain to lease the entire
retail building. The applicant indicated they are not looking to lease to a
Tavern or Tattoo type business. The applicant and their representatives also
informed the neighbors that they have requested an abeyance of the General
Plan Amendment and the Rezoning application to allow for the Site
Development Plan Review and the Special Use Permit applications to be
heard all at once as one development proposal. They informed the neighbors
that are anticipating presenting everything together to the Planning
Commission on August 9, 2016.
Concerns:
The neighbors do not want the General Plan designation or the zoning to
change. The neighbors feel that once the zoning is changed, Special Use
Permits are easy to get and any type of land use would be able to occupy
the proposed retail building.
Are afraid homeless will hide behind the retail building and hop the
wall to the adjacent residential units to the west.
Concerned with the noise associated with having a 24-hour drive-through
restaurant.
They are also concerned about lighting, and the lighting disturbing them
during the night.
The neighbors expressed concern over increased traffic on Cheyenne
Avenue and Fort Apache Road, as well as garbage trucks and delivery
trucks during early morning hours.
NE/CS

Staff Report Page Ten
There was concern expressed about the current status of traffic along both
Cheyenne Avenue and Fort Apache in regards to excessive speeding and
u-turns.
Concern was also raised about property values. The neighbors feel this
development would reduce their property values, and do not want these
proposed businesses in their neighborhood. These type of services are
already available to them just down the road.
The neighbors would like to see a sound wall to be constructed on top of
the existing 6-foot wall.
The neighbors in attendance were opposed to the proposed General Plan
Amendment and Zone change, and the conceptual shopping center
presented. They want the lot to remain Office, and for it to be developed like
the office complex adjacent to this lot to the north.
Field Check
06/02/16
Staff performed a routine field check where a vacant, undeveloped lot was
observed.

Site Area
Net Acres
2.17
Surrounding
Property
Subject Property
North
South
East
West
Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12
Undeveloped
Office, Other Than
Listed
Detached Single
Family Residential
Other Than Listed
Planned or Special
O (Office)
Public Utility
PF (Public Facility)
Multi-Family
Residential
MLA (Medium Low

Attached Density
Residential)
O (Office)
ML (Medium Low
Density Residential)
ML (Medium Low

O (Office)
O (Office)
P-C (Planned Community)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
U (Undeveloped) [PF
(Public Facilities)]
R-PD8 (Residential
Planned Development 8
Units Per Acre)
NE/CS

Staff Report Page Eleven
Master Plan Areas

Compliance
N/A
Compliance
N/A

Trails Pedestrian Path
Compliance
Y
N/A
N/A
N/A
Pursuant to 19.08, etc., the following standards apply:
Standard
Required/Allowed
Min. Lot Width
100 Feet
Min. Setbacks
Front
10 Feet
Side
10 Feet
Corner
10 Feet
20 Feet
Rear
Max. Lot Coverage
50 %
Max. Building Height
N/A*
Screened, Gated, w/
Trash Enclosure
a Roof or Trellis
Mech. Equipment
Screened
* Residential Adjacency Standards do not apply.
Provided
Feet
Compliance
Y or N
15 Feet
20 Feet
26 Feet
20 Feet
15 %
24 Feet
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Screened
Pursuant to Title 19.08, the following standards apply:

Landscaping and Open Space Standards
Required
Standards
Ratio
Trees
Buffer Trees:
North
1 Tree / 20 Linear Feet
13 Trees
South
10 Trees
East
14 Trees
19 Trees
West
Provided
Compliance
13 Trees
10 Trees
14 Trees
19 Trees
Y
Y
Y
Y
NE/CS

Staff Report Page Twelve

Required
Standards
Ratio
Trees
TOTAL PERIMETER TREES
56 Trees
1 Tree / 6 Uncovered
Parking Area Trees
Spaces, plus 1 tree at the
37 Trees
end of each row of spaces
LANDSCAPE BUFFER WIDTHS
Min. Zone Width
North
8 Feet
South
15 Feet
East
15 Feet
8 Feet
West
Wall Height
6 to 8 Feet Adjacent to Residential
Street Name
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Cheyenne Avenue
Primary Arterial
Fort Apache Road
Primary Arterial
Governing Document
and Highways
and Highways
Provided
Compliance
56 Trees
37 Trees
8 Feet
15 Feet
15 Feet
8 Feet
6 Feet
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Compliance
with Street
Section
100
100
Parking Requirement
Required
Provided
Compliance
Gross Floor
Parking
Parking
Area or
Use
Parking
HandiHandiNumber of
Ratio
Regular
Regular
capped
capped
Units
Five spaces,
plus one
Auto Repair
space for
3,115 SF
21
Garage, Minor
each 200 SF
of gross
floor area.
NE/CS

Staff Report Page Thirteen
Parking Requirement
Gross Floor
Area or
Use
Number of
Units
General Retail
Store, Other
8,580 SF
Than Listed
Required
Provided
Compliance
Parking
Parking
Parking
HandiHandiRatio
Regular
Regular
capped
capped
1:175
One space
for each 50
846 SF
square feet
Public
of public
seating and
waiting area
Restaurant
plus one
with Drive
space
for
1576 SF
Through
each 200
(Remaining
square
feet
Gross Floor
of the total
Area)
remaining
gross floor
area.
Waivers
Requirement
Buildings on corner lots should
be oriented to the corner and to
the street fronts.
Service bay doors shall not face
public rights-of-way.
50
17
96
92
Request
To not orient the
buildings to the corner
and the street fronts.
To allow the service
bay doors to face the
public right-of-way.
97
91
Y
Y
Denial
Denial
NE/CS
GPA-64838
GPA-64838
A
77 7
77AA 7A
777
A77 777A
77
b
b
b777b
77
7

7

6bb 6
6bb776
b57b
b5 b
7b

77

7
b777b
b
b
b
77
77
b77
b
7b
b
77
b777b

775
5
7

7777
67776
6
6
777
b777b
777b
77
7
77

77 77
7 7b
77A b A7b
77
777
7A 7 A7
77 A A
77A
777

77A 7b
77b 7
7
77
77 A 7b
7b 7A
AA
77 7
77 A
777 7
77Ab A7b
77A7b
77A7b
77b 7A
77 b
777 7
77AAb 7
77A7 7
77 7 7
77A 7b 7
77 7 7b
7A
b777b
b

b7777b
b

7
7777 7
7 77777777 7b
7 77 777 7
777 77777
7 7
77 7 7
b77
77 77
GPA-64838, ZON-64839, SUP-65273, SDR-65272 and TMP-65348 - REVISED
777
b7 b7AA7777
7
7?7A77b7
7777
A77
77
7A
77A7
7A
777
777777777777777777777777777777
A7
AA
A
7A
77AA
7A
77b7
7b
7Ab7b
7bb777
A7?7bA?A
bAb77
7777777
777777
777
7777
7777
77
77b77
777
7777
777
b7 b7AA7777
A77
A
77
7A
77A7
7A
777
777777777777777777777777777777
7
A7A
7A
77AA
7A
77b7
7b
7Ab7b
7bb777
A7=7bA=A
bAb77
7777777
777777
7
7=7A77b7
b
7777
777
7777
7777
77
77b77
777
7777
GPA-64838 [PRJ-64792] - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT RELATED TO ZON-64839, SUP-65273, SDR65272 AND TMP-65348 - APPLICANT: BOOS DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC. - OWNER: NEVADA STATE
BANK
NORTHWEST CORNER OF CHEYENNE AVENUE AND FORT APACHE ROAD
06/02/16
BANK
06/02/16
BANK
06/02/16
BANK
06/02/16
BANK
06/02/16
GPA-64838 and ZON-64839
GPA-64838 and ZON-64839
GPA-64838 and ZON-64839
JuI.05.2OL6 05:15 PM J. W. WOOD
PAGE.
70261 57 27 2
REEIVED
City of
Depa
Devel
333
JUL
Planning
Services Center
o Drive,3rd Floor
1t 2016
0ity of Las Veoas

Dept. of ptanriing
da-89L96-
MaryJ
Unit 102
940t
{7ozi
rie Ave
Dear Sir:
l'm w
Group in
Lneye
When
above'm
Now c
of
Ac
lSe,yen-E
one mile
which
to Silver
way we
It isa kn
Burger
a
allow
Cfie,yenn
miles
beating
the I
vehicle
is
let you know that I heartily object to the attempt by The Boos Development
request to rezone the vacant land next to the Silver Spur Housing located at
Forf Apache (S9T29)i Application'GFA-6.4838'* ZcrN:6-4839;
it was Wth the understanding that the

oned property was zoned for OFFICE BUILDINGS, which we had no objection to
Boos Developrnent Group wanting to rezone to be commercial' The very idea
ed our home here
Slx years ago,
r-hour drive through fast food and auto repair next door is unacceptable
m'the property is a stiip mll'with a'subway saneJwieh shop, dry claners, a
Timbers sasino-restaurnt, igs st'tion;andan'empty bilding for lease.'fldthin
is location, we already have McDonald'5 Burger King, KFC, and Taco Bell' All of
find their wrappers and drink cups along cheyenne and in front of the entrance
On top of that The Boos Group wants to put in a Jiffy Lube when again; one mile
ave aMidas Muff]er and serteral rrinor vehicle repair shops'
factthattheety,pesof briEinesses,liketoj"CLUSTER'look'attheMcDonald'land
own the road. First, we had Burger King and KFC. Now we have a McDonald's with
-hour drive through. However, there are no homes next to these properties' To
Group to rezone and move in is the beginning of the downward spiral of our
,ful v.afire of o**r hsnes ar*d animEitat4cr to c*'ime'
aql.d t{ae,n ti red+*ctiorn
ls lightty pa:olledand is treacherous to dve.at best rspeeds of frfl'v-five tosixty

r a common ocurrence. Just pulling out onto the street can often be a heart
ence for those of us at Silver Spur. The intersection of Fort Apache and Cheyenne
of vehicle and pedestrian near misses (not reported but often seen by us) and of
sofe with deadly esults. Now this group Wnts ro to fezone an bring
to s.tart maneuverlngfor entrr/ and.exitingthese prOposed and un-needed
lq-7I ?
Pg t oPz
Jul.05.2OL6 05:l-6 PM J. w.
WOOD
70267 57 27 2
PAGE.
ir, try negotiating past McDonald*s, Burger King and KFC down the street during,
b
ch or dinner. The sudden maneuverings of vehicles entering and exiting from
these
hments on the four-lane Boulevard are hazardous at best.
'Oirr'llttl
munity f'silver'Spur is quieL law-biding and'many of'us are retred.'Our-FIOA is

keeping the ground*rlpand our homes,in top repair. t{.e feel we arefortunate
a place to live. Our properties just began to recover from the historic crash of a
firm but
to have
few yea
Please, don't ruin this for us by rezoning and placing unwanted, unneeded,
to
busi
us.
Property
Sllver
l0.,-?
Qgn 8z
RCEIVE
JUt I
Ztlh
C'ity of Las Vegas
Dept. of Planning
Dear Members of the Department of Planning:
My wife and I live across the street of Cheyenne in Sun City from the property adjacent to the proposed
Boos Development Group, lnc.
We strongly oppose their general plan development to change the O (office) to SC {servce commercial)'
We purchased our home located on 9300 Fresh Spring rive here in Las Vegas , zip 89L34, in May of
2015, Our reason for disproval of said development are for the reasons, as follow...
Noise, the 7 eleven is a constant reminder of such a development, which is adjacent on Fort
Apache Rd. to the Boos proposed ste. Drunken people at night, yelling, cars peeling out, engines
rewing from kids racing and showing off. Driving too fast. I have seen a lot of accidents here.
Lights, the post signs are very tall and are intrusive.
Property value, noise, lights, and genral development of these type of commercial property will
lower our neighborhood property values.
Bottom line, office buildings are adjacent to this Boos development site on Fort Apache Rd. Their quiet,
non-invasive and reasonable with sign height. lmportantly, a O (office) will allow a servce, that s more
beneficial for the surrounding development of our community.
1.
2.
3.
Sincerely,
William Kacensky
-4
Dare: 07106 /2016
pn.uqWb
Lot'v4L4
l\'l)7
REEruD
JUL
\ utt
Cily Hall
lo
11
2016
eity of Las Vegas
Dept. of Planning
$t
Gty Hrlt
Lulsrl
l
If
you u'ish
to fle your
protest
or
lh
support on this requcst. chcck thc
appropriate box below and relurn this card in an envelope with postage to the
Depanment of Planning at thc adclress listcd above, fax this side of'tltis card tc
(702) 464-'1499. lf you would like to contact your Council Representativc,
pleasc call (7 02), 229-6405.
lfy,i
@i,,'.",:*
Please use a vailable blank space on card for your comments
GPA.4E38 & ZON-64839 [PRJ-64792]

Planning Commission Meeting of 7ll2l2l6
5 f ['i?lrurr
i'
t '5'$
lct-?J>7
Tr sn f RnNNr\r
1or- thq.- 1\q1
Ltur*lhN G [3aR
FRuv.'n:_
l?.
? a b*
R l GP - bTaEB 4 uN - tf
=y
RECIV
JUL
11
2016
G'ity of l-as Vegas
Dept. of Planning
City of Las Vegrs

epartrnent r.rf Planni n g
Developrne.tx Senices Cctr
333 Noilh Racho Dri.ve. 3'o F'loot
Las Vegas, Nevsds 891 06
PAI DLae Vegas; N
Return Servi*e Requested

Officlal Notice of Public Ilenring
\
0arl
PRSBT
FIRSTTLASS M
U.S. Postanr
-Pv!-lo'1q
The noise, odors arl taf.frc generflted
by the proposed develoPrnont ofa
Jifff Lube and a Del Taco restaurent
vill bt detrimntal to our peacefui
communttY.
Property values will drop becuse
aforementioned proble.ms, and for
City Hall
ofthe
many in the commuitY, ourhomss
ll
you wish to file yc'ur protest or support on this requcst, check tie
approprirte bcx below a[d tuil this card in an envelr:pe with postage to the
Departiltent of Plannirtg at the address listed above. fax thir rirle of this car] to
(1O2) 464-1499. If you rvoukl like ta cntct your courtcil Rplpsentative,
please call m) ?79- 64$5.
I SUPPORT
this Regucst
I OPPOS
this Request
foryour comrnentsGpA-64838 & ZON.|839 IPRI-47921
Pleas use svailable blank space on ca.d
Planning Conrmission Meeting
f.
are or only asset,

Please deny the rtquest
fol rzing
fromOtoC-1. ThankYoul38oz8lzooe
case: GPA44a3B
BFIDERS LILLIAN G 1897 FAM TR

BOHDERS LILLIAN GRACE THS
e3o1 MT CASH AVE #loa
LASVEGASNV 8S1297503
7 112]?016
ttt.. ttttttt,.i,,tt,,il,l Itl, I il L,,1,,1, ll lll,lil
l'il,lI,:,??
.n
rtr
m
RECEIVD
ciryorlas\egrs
i'r
3i3 ),,lorrh Rancho Dric.

Las vcsls, )le!da 8el
PHSRT
FIRS: CLSS I"IIL
U.5. Pos.tage
JUL 112016
Depirrnrent f PlaniDg
Drvelorlrrerrt Strviccs Center
Floor
Oity Of LaS VegaS

g'pt. Of planning
Return Servite Requested

Ofticial Notice of Public Hearing
PID
-as /gas. \\t

Perrni: No. lCt
l--
-'.*0-+
-i.t
'L7
z
F
d-o
A-t--
|ri
19
Citp Hall
L^t
.J
L.J
If
lilc
or
support on this rcqucst. check the
]our
-vou wisb [o
appropriate box beloru and relurn ths card in an cnvelope B'jth poslage to th
Department of Plailning at the adrftrss listed above, fax this side of this card 1
prolsf
{7t2) 164-?499. If you rvoul<l like 1 coact 'our Counci} Representalive*

plerse call (72) 229-6405.
I SUPPORT
is Request
I
.i
(r,?,"ff,
on card for your cornmnts.
availatrle blank ipace

GP.-64838 & Z.ON-6483e [PRJ-64792]
Planning Conrrnission }fof#J#l}Sfrp
Please use
yr1 a.&zZ
:'S
J
#..
.s
lllrlf llfllrrllllrJtl',.i,llt'fllf
,,,lfl,lllrtf ,lll'tr,,f,ll
f
15:
fi
E
t
1l
-0
\q-u?
IL
IL
LD
$
tl
IU
tsr
r-
's
r:!
t!
rs
:J
F)
Cit of Las Vegas

Drprtreen of Pianning
PESNT
FIFSTCI.,SS \NAIL
U.S. Postaoe
frrclopment Scrrices Center

-l-i I'iilnh Rrnchn Drice. 3'o Floor
Lrs \-qas, Ncvada 8910
PA
Return Service Requested

Officil Notice of Pullic Hearing
JUL
f'l
lU-
Las Vegas, NV
REGEIV
Pernit I'J0.1630
11 2016
City of Las Vegas

Dept. of Plannlng
tf)
n-
P1
I
rs
u]
Cty Hll
:
U
z
(f
t!
lt tr;tr ,ish trr li[c -vou flotst .!r sr)l]ort on this r*qucsl, chcck thc
iirptoFrialc hor hclt>* ilnd relurl this rri! in irn cnvelope llJ1h postagc to the
DcFirnnrnl of Planning l the ddrr:ss lisled attove' J'a,t ths sideol rhis card to
:1,:lll 44-1499. lf yOu rvould like 10 contct your CounciI Rpresetrtative,
',crs.' tall tl{tl r :29-4O5.
L.iPP{)R'r
thi\ ll.cqr'ssl
Please use
case: GPA'64838
fi[lf,"[:l:*
ar'ailable hlank ipace on card for your cornmenls
GPl-6,18-8
Planrrin-e
rggo7g1zo41
BEM LINDA I. TRUS]'

BEM LINDA lel TRS
9437 MT CHERIE AVE 103
LAS VEGAS NV 89129-7574
& Z0-64S39 [PRJ-64792]
Comlrrission N{Tl1,l.t,"f3,21?.,9*+.-
cH
Fii-
lfllltlfifl{I{flff
tf
l,r'J'lll,tllll','fl,llt,llt,llf,ttI,,l,ll
ul
tL
\q-uP
vv
. vfj
t-lJ I
lv: L tuz4tj+'/4gg
FROM : 2023888688
Page:
PRSRT
Cit' ol Las Vegas

Depanment ot Pianning
FIRST CLSS I'iAIL
U.S. Postage
Dcr'elopment Serr icr's Centcr

33 orth Rancho Drre. 'J Focr
l5 \iegas. Nevada 89 I
PAII)
Las Vegas, NV
Permit No. 130
Return Setviee Requested

Official liotice'of Publie Hearing
RECEIVFD
JUL
!
693
11
2016
City of Las Veoas

Dept. of Planriing
Gty $rlt
1,ou riish to I'ile your plotest or supllon on this request' cheek the
appropriate box belt.rr and return this card in an envelope rvith postage to tlte
Depatment oi Planning at the a<Jdress listed above. far' this .siile ol this card ro
(?01) -164-7499- lf :ou rvould like to corllact -vour Council Represcrntatite.
please call t?02) 229-6'105.
Il
I SUPPORT
this Request
139078'18064
HUNI JASOI-I W
3328 BIG SANDY CtR
I OPPOSE
this Request
Case: GPA4838
LASVEGASNV 89129-f52
Please use available blank space on card for your comments.
GpA-64838 & ZON-4839 [PRJ-64792]

Planning Commission lvleeting of 1ll7l716
; irr i:rrti.:l;i'ji3;:
rs'
J:
;T1
l, l lln
ii11,,,,il,tlll,'fftittt,flf I'1,'lli'llfl'{llllrl
v-??
City ot'Las Vegas
PRSRT
FIRSTCLASS MAIL
U.S, Postage
PAI O
Las Vegas, NV
Permit No. 1630
Departmcnt ol' Planning

Development Serviccs Center
333 Nonh Rancho Drivc. 3d Floor
Las Vegas. Ncvada 89 I 06

Official Notice of Public Hearing
RCF'IV}
6tt
.luL
City Hall
at*
Il' you wish to lile your
1 21b
titv of Las Vegas

Oe-Pt. of Planntng
5t
or suppon on this
request, check the

appropriate box hclow and relurn this card in an envelopc wth postage to the
Dcpartmcnt of Planning at thc address listcd above. fax this side ofthis card to
QA2) 464-'1499. If you would likc to conct your Council Representative.
plcase call (7 02) 2?9 -6405.
I SUPPORT
this Rcqucst
protcst
1ggorg17o27
case: GP464838
G & G-TRUST
HAUCK RICHARD G A MARY G TRS
9413 MT BRET AVE *101
LAS VGAS NV 89129.7580
,K li,.",,i3o'.,,
Please use available blank spa'Ce on card for your comments.
cpA-64838 & ZON.6483e [PRJ-64792]

Planning Commission Meeting of 7ll2DAl6
t 5 jr.i?f{i:r:
ll,,',1,flff, ll,llt
ft
tll,f, l,,,flf l,f, l, lf, l,Jffll,l,ll,llll
\q-u
City of Las Vcgas

l)cpatmcnt of Planning
PRST
FIRST CI-ASS IAIL
U.S. Postaoe
l)cvelopment Services Center

333 North Rancho Drive. 3d Floor
Las Vegas. Nelada 8910
PAI DLas Vagas, NV

Permil No. 1630

Official Notice of Publc Hearing
RGIVD
@6tl
JUL
Cry Hall
11
201b
of Las Vegas
et. ot Planning
CTtv
Il' you wish to fle your protest or
support on this request. check thc

appropriate box bclow and return this card in an envelope with postage to thc
Dcpartment of Planning at the address listed above, fax this side of this card to
('102) 464-7499. .lf you would like to contact your Council Rcpresentative,
please call (7 02\ 229 -6405
l,,,'fi",:i fi[],'?,'ff,i,
Please use available blank space n card for
cpA-64838 & ZON-6483e [PRJ-64792]

Planning Commission }fetbr';of
flffi,$i9r,=
13g07817006
case:GPA4838
COOK JAMES L
S3OO MOUNT CASH AVE #103
LAS VEGAS NV 89129.7545
comments
r:
i ;
,,\1,1,il 4,l,,fl rilf
, lr
r,f
n,t ,t,tlullt[ r'111"[
I4r
City of Las Vegas
PRSRT
Department of Planning
Devclopment Sen'iccs Centcr
333 Nonh Rancho Drive..ld Floor
Las Vegas- Nevada 89 I 06
FIRST CLASS i,qIL
U.S. Postage
PA ID
Las Vegas, NV
Pemit No, 1630

Oficial Notice of Public Hearing
,R.OE,IV}
JuL 11
\ 6t
Ultv of Las Vegas

CIe'Pt. ot Planntng
City Hall
.t3
lf
te-
sr
you wish to lle your prolest or supporl on this request, check
the
appropriatc box bclow and retum this card in an envelope with postage to the
Department ol Planning at the addrcss listcd abovc, fax this side of this card to
QAI !6a7499. If
please call
(7
you would likc to contact your Council Representative,
02) 229-6405.
I SUPPORT
this Rcqucst
1b
I OPPOSE
this Requcst
13907g1706r
case: GPA'6+838
BROWN HITA G REVOCABL tIV TR

BROWN RITA G TRS
9321 MTCASH AV #102
LAS VEGAS NV 89129-75,18
cpA-4E3E & ZON.6483e [PRJ-64792]

Pranning commission
tTF"t3Ff'S1'.*r'r.
r:
vl,,1il,1rt,,fiil!iltllt,rfullllllllf ,ll,,1l''llf
lq-zg?
City of Las Vegas
PRSRT
FIRSTCLASS MAL
U.S, Postage
Depanment ol Planning
Dcvelopmcnt Sen,iccs Center
Las Vegas. Nevada tl9 106
PA ID
Las Vegas, NV
Permit No. 1630

REEIVD
JUL
tott
tr
2o1b
i':il'"\?iJTi;
Cry Hfl
at
tbtr
ll' you wish to file your protest or
support on this request, check the

card in an envelope with postage to thc
appropriate box below and return thi.s

Department of Planning at thc addrcss listed above, fax this side of this card to
(7O2\ 4$.7499. Il'you would like to contact your Council Reprcsentative,
1ggo78i7o9g
STOUBEFI LIVING TRUST

STOUBER SEYMOUR & PHYLLIS A TRS
9336 MT CASH AVE #101
LAS VEGAS NV 89'129.7546
please call (7 07) 229 -&O5.
I SUPPORT
this Request
tr
case: GPA'64838
I OPPOSE
ths Request

cpA-64838 & ZON-6489 IPRI -647 921
Pranning commission
t,"t,gtolru,r*J
s r
,, r lu[ ill,l
lf , l, ,, | 1,, f l l | r r f I r I I I I f f , l, , f ,
lq-7o?
City of Las Vegas

Depanment of Planning
PRSRT
FIRSTCLASS MAIL
[J.S. Postaoe
Development Services Cente

333 Norrh Rancho Drive. -1d Floor
Las Vegas. Nevad 89106
PAIDLas Vegas, NV
Permit No. 1630

RE0fVD)
JuL
It
o
oStt
1 2U1b
of Las Vegas
net. or Planntng
titv
City Hall
il
Clty Hll
ltqi
M0
.9ltkr
Il
you wi-sh to filc your prorcsl or .suppon on this rcquest, chcck
the
appropriate hox bclow and rclum this card in an envelope with postage to the
Department of Planning at the ddress listed abovc, fax this side of this card to
rg8oTgrTogz
case: GPA{4838
(?02) 464-7499. ll'you would like to onat your Council Reprr:sentative,
ADEL,,:AN FONALO & VERDEAN M
please cal I (7 02) 229 -6405.
9425 MT BRT AVE #103

LASVEGAS NV 89129-7579
i-
l-l
suPPoRr i
Request ll
tt'is
r oPPOSE
rnis Rcqucst

GpA-64838 & ZON-64839 [PRJ-64792J
Pranning Commission
t"f,B"r&W&?lfu"i ,
fflttll'f
,,1
I'ltfl,f ff lllt t,f ff l,lff ,,,,
1',lllf ,llt
rlllfl,l
lq-?g ?
(Y t's
SctaL os
Cte/ta'l'r/{
al
su
(o[c:|7rc
fu*rr,rl O Dt 77c ft tL l/,L?t ,t, ,'' r1,<rt'6 fl /t7 /514,<-o,t, f
rso {rL+'vprc
r{
,0 / tc/rf 7t t/
cityorlasVegas
/o/otr/
Developmentscrvicescenter V"*i o iri'
lili:si:inî,"
PRSRT
e u7'1o e7 ou ot'(onlqutif
uEo
//h,fr$ tt t
n*
FIRSTCUSS MAIL
U.S. Postaoe
PAIDLas Vegas, NV
Permit No. 1630

JUt i tr z01tj
titv
of Las Vegas
e"Pt. ot Flanning
rg9
tt
Cry HU
9t t
lf
l-rtt
you wish to file your protesl or support on this request. check
the
appropriate box below and return this card in an envelope with postage (o the
Dcpartment of Planning at the address listed above, fax this side of this card to
(702) 464-7499. If you would like to contct your,Ccuncil Representative,
plcase call (702) 229-6/'05.
r
suPPORT lVl
Request l\l
this
13g07g17045
Gase:GP464838
COLONNA LIVING TRUST

COLONNA GIROLAMO & JOAN TRS
9437 MT CASH AVE fIOl
LAS VEGAS NV 89T29-7558
oPPosE
tnis Rcquest
Please use available blank spacd on card for your commens.
cpA-64838 & ZON-64E39 [PRJ-64792]

Pl an n
ing com
ssion
" "i!p
"tJlf?119,t
'$*
r,
;i
ll,
lltl{lrl!,,
l, I 1,,
f1
lf ll, ll1ff l f
"
lf
f
'flll,, rll' ll'
lq-u?
City of Las Vegas
PRSRT
Developmcnt Serviccs Ccnter
333 Nonh Rancho Drive. 3'd Floor
Las Vcgas. Nevada 89 I 0
FIRST CLASS lvlAlL
U.S. Postage
PA ID
Las Veg, NV
Permil No. 1630
RCIV

JUL n 1 20ltj
Oity of l-as Vegas
Dept. of Planning
tD
rrtt
A
N
Clty Hall
L@t6t'Lp
atstk
lf
you wi.sh to file your protest or suppon on this rcquest, check
thc ^.
appropriate box below and return this card in an envelope with postage to the
Deprtnent ofPlanning t the address listed above, fax this side ofthis card to
(702) 464-7499.
lf you would like lo contact your Council
Representative,
please call (7 02) 229 -6405.

I SUPPORT
this Request
lf,7f r oPPosE
Nthis Request
13807817041
Casa: GP4.64838
BEM LINDA M TRUST

BEM LINDA M TRS
9437 MT CHERIE AVE #103
LAs VEGAS NV 89129-7574
Please u.se available blank Space on card for your comments
cpA.64838 & Z9.N-64839 [PRJ-64792]

Planning commission tut,#lfffl,,s2,,96.f
cris,t
j.i
lllltllllll\rfit,',l,lllllf{|"'llt,lltf
lll,lll,l,,ftf ll
14.70?
City of Las Vegas

PRSRT
FIFSTCI,ASS MAIL
U.S. Postage
Dcvclopment Services Centcr

333 North Rancho Drir.c.3'd Floor
Las Vegas. Nevada 89106
PA ID
Las Vegas, NV
PermlN0. 1630
REIV

JUL
1tr
2016
.ity of Las Vegas
tout
Dept. of Planning
tt
I'lall
A
N
cll}Hrll
Lt6Mt
3M9
If
you wish to file your Frotcst or suppon on this rcquest. check
the
appropriate box bclow and rcturn this card in an envelope with postage to the
Depatment of Planning at the address listcrJ abovc, fax this side of this card to
(702) 4*7499. lf you woutd likc to conlact your Council Reprcsentative,
please call (7 02) 229 -05.
380781 701 6
Case: GPA4838
ELLIOTT JANICE
9321 MOUNT BRETAVE #101
I SUPPORT
this Requcst
i lt
Ni,',',i$:,,
lor your comments.
ra
i".{:;
Please use available blank space on card
GPA-64838 & ZON.64839 IPRI-647921

Pran ni ng
commi ssion
t,jfgu"
# &Ef.
e,
E. L Z
,,,lt,,ll,,tl,f lltf ,llf ,llt,ltil|tf ,f,tf t,f t,unlln,illl
\t\4n?
City of Las Vcgas

f)epanment of Planning
PRSBT
FIRSTCLqSS UIAIL
U.S. Poslage
PAI D
Las Vegas, NV
Permit No. 1630
Dcvelopmcnt Serviccs Centcr

Noith Rancho Drive.3'd Floor
-333
Las Vcgas. Ncvada 89106

REEIVED
\ Utt,
JUL
'r
1 216
Clty Hall
City of l-as Vegas

DePt. of Planntng
l$
If you wish to lile your protesl or suppon on ths rcqust. check the
appropriate box below and return this card in an cnvolclpc with postage to the
Dcpartment of Planning at the addrcss listcd abovc. f ax this side of this card to
your Council Rcpresentative.
QA 464-7499. If you wou ld likc to
plcase call (7 02) 229 -6405.
this Reqrrest
casa: GPA-64838
LAROCCA ROEERT A LIVING TFUST

9436 MOUNT CASH #103
I OPPOSE
his Requcst
I SUPPORT
ig8o7817o44
your comments,
Please use available blank
GpA.64838 & 2ON.64839 [PRJ-64792]

Planning Commission Meeting o 7ll2l2Ol6
riiri:';;,.ii"
g r
fi
4lillllllh,tlt['ll,y'tt'tl'q'tl'iltlltt'lll'fll'lllf'l'l
lq-z7
City of Las Vcgas
PRSRT
Depanmcnt ol'Planning
Development Scrviccs Center
333 Norrh Rancho l)rivc. 3'd Floor
Las Vegas. Ncvada 8910
FIRST CLASS
MAII
U.S, Poslage
PAID
L Vegas, NV
Permil No, 1630

RGIVE
JUt
\
6tt
tr
1 2016
City Hall
titv of l-as Vegas

Pe-pt. ot Flanning
lf
you wish to llc your protest or suppon on this rcqucstr chcck thc
appropriate box bclow and relun this card in an cnrclope with postage to the
Depannrent ol Planning at thc a<ldress listed abo"'e, fax this side tll'this card to
(702) 464-7499. lf you would like to contact your Council Rcprcscnlative,
please call (7 02) 229-6405,
I.SUPPORT
case: GPA'64838
FLIX MAFIY J
9401 MT CHERIE AVE
Et',-**,
this Requcst
1ggo7g171og
Please use available blank spac on card tor your comments.
GpA-4838 & ZON-64839 [PRl-64792]

{ii?irf.J
;F
l,lftl,flt,ltll'll',ll,1lf l,llllf ,lll,,,fllf 'lf "lll'l'l
lq-?-0?
City of Las Vcgas
PRSRT
lpanment of Planning
FIRST CLASS MAIL
Devclopment Sen'iccs Center

Nonh Rancho Drive. 3d Floor
Las Vcgas. Ncvada 89106
U.S. Postaoe
l3l
PAI DLas Vegas, NV

Permil No, 1630

RCEIV
JUL
o6t3
2016
Cfty of Las Vegas

Dept. of Planning
It' you wish to file your prolest or support on this
rL'quest, chcck thc
rppropriate box helow and return this card in an envelope wi(h poslge to lho
Deparlment of Planning t the ddress listed above, fax this side of this card to
(702) 464-7499. lf you would like to contact your Council Rcprcscntativc,
plcasc call (702) 229-6405.
I SUPPORT
this Request
Case: GPA-64838
1 380781 7042
VLCEK FAMILY TRUST
VLCEK JOAN TRS
9436 MT CASH AVE f101
I OPPOSE
this Request
LASVEGAS NV 8S12S
GpA,64838 & ZON.648se [PRJ-64792]

Planning Commission Meeting of 7l1212016
ri,.iirjp s..F
,l,l'rff
l'llltflilil'l\'rillflll'll't'f3l'lrtillt'rilnll
lT-tn?
City ol'Las Vegas

l)epartment of Planning
PRSRT
FIRST CLASS MAIL
Dcvclopnrcnt Serviccs Center

333 North Rancho Drive. 3'd Floor
Lus Vcgas. Ncvada 8910
U.S, Postage
PA ID
Las Vegas, NV
Permit No. 1630

RECIV
JUL tr 1
tf
Ciry Hall
2016
eTty of Las Vegas
Dept" of Planning
tg
If' you wish to fle your prolest or support on this request, check
thc
appropriate box below and return this card n an cnvcfope with postage to the
Dcpar{mcnt ofPlanning at the addess listed above. fax this side ofthis card to
QA 4&-7499.
lf you would like
(o contact your Council Representativc.
pleasc cnll ('102J 229-6405.
13go78r7osl
MASKOWSKY ALICE & ROSE

LAS VEGAS NV 89129
I SUPPORT
this Request
,,""Klt:i.i:i,
cas: GPA+1838
c. mmen,s
cpA-64838 & ZON-6483e [PRJ-64792]

Planning Commission Meeting af 7llUZAl6
c [Fir:,rj'jr= J
J.
l'lll'n'il'l"llllll1l|llh"
llf
lrfl'ltlf lllf
'fll'll,f 'ltllll
lq-u?
Jul.05 .2OL6 05:15 PM J. hI.

City of Las Vegas
Department of
Development
333 North Rancho
-1,asVeg+s.
PAGE.
10261 57 27 2
VOOD
PRSRT
RHSTCLCSS M
U,S, Po$age
PAI
Floor
las:Yegas,NV.
Pemit No. l63(
Reqrested,
Public
Hearing
Notice of
RECIVED
JUL
City Hall
II
2016
of Las Veoai
Dept. of ptanriing
GTty
If
you wish to
appropriate box
Deparnent of
{7A 464-7499.
please call (702)
on this reguest, check the

envelope with postage to the
the addess listed above, fax this side of this card to
vould like Io contcl your Council Represenradve'
138o7g17iog
fi[l,m'
this
sMrcFtEnleve
LAS VEGAS
NV 89129'568
spac on card for Your colnments'
Please use
GPA-64838
Planning
case:GP'648
FELIXMAfVJ
&
[PRI-64792]
Meeting of 711212016
{}ffi}'*fd J
, c
t
J.J&,#i.t/. il,,lk,tfi hlt'HrvhL*'lllil
^thl
\1
14
|'
l'1
g-??
Jul, \.2016
^ 111
tltr,0lJJ
t\r
10:514M
tity of Lns Vegas
D
r.
I
I
PR$BT.
FIRSTCLASS MAIL
U.$. Postaga
PAI D
Las Vegas, NV
Parnlt No, 1630
Pepanrent of Planning
Derrelgp1 $ervices Cgnter
333 Nrth Rancho rive,3td Floor
Las Vegas, Nevada 89106
Returr Service Requested
Officlsl Notice of Public learing
JUL
City of
Dept. of
City Hall
20t6
s
nn ng
lf
you rvish to file your protest or support on this rque$t' cbeck the
apprrrpriate box belorv rnd returr this csrd in an envelope witlt postage to the
Depilnent of Pnning at the addrss listed abovq fax this sid f lhs card ts
(7m) 464-7499. If you rvould like t ctdtct your Coutuil
pleose call
srrPPr)RT El
Request Xl
rhi.s
8-co:0P444838
JONES JUNE & PABTCH MARY REV TB
Representative-,
9SO1
{7m) 229-6405.
r
390781 700S
MTCHERIEAVE#103
ropposu
,hitn"qo*t.
Please u.se available. blank space on card for y.our omments-
GpA-64838 & ZoN-6483e [PRJ-64792]

Planning Conunission *?-L.4H."tr.I4,9106*
s..E
1,lilf
,f ,f
,lt,, l, lllll'lftr l,lf,fh
l,lll,r nu,
\\'La?
City of [-as Vegix

Depalmenr of Planning
PRSBT
FIRST CI.ASS I'/AIL
Deve,opment Seryices Center

33-'l Nonh lancho Drive, 3d Floor
Las Vegas, Neada 89106
U.S. Postaoe
PAID
Las Vegas, NV
Permit No. 1630
RECEIVD

JUL
11 2016
City of Las Veoas

Dept. of planni-ing
\
^
H
Cilyll11
Le litrp
If you wish to file
vour protest or support on this rcquesL check lhe

appropriate box below and retum this card in an envelope wich postage to the
Depar'tment of Planning at the address listed above, Jx this side of this card to
i7A2) 464-'1499. If -vou would like t contact your Council Representative.
pleasv
ca
I i72) 229 -b405.

I SUPPORT
this Request
3B07Bt 701 6
Case: GPA-9838
ELLIOTTJANICE
9321 MOUNTBREAVE #101
LAS VEGAS NV 89.129-7575
ML?,'[y;?*
lur yt)ur c(,mrncnts.
Please use availale blank spacc-un uanJ
GPA-64838 &
Z0lr-fi839 [pRJ-647921
Planning commisson lvleee-of ?/,f2l?,fl,$u,*
'd
99t95OL
'.
,8f, j.
J_i,
,,,lly,l[1,,,11,,ltt,iij,lft,lttlt,l,t,lt,illlfit,,,ltltl
rideLeql
leuoricunl
eg:0 f g L g0
lnl
lqnnr
Jul.06.2OL6 01:18 AM J. vl.
wooD
0261 51 27 2
PRSRT
FIRSTCLASS M
U,S, Postase
City of Las Vegas

Department of
Development
333 North Racho
Las Vegas, Nevada
PAGE.
3'd
PA ID
Floor
L Vegas, NV
Pernitl$o. ?63t
Service Requested.
Notiee f Prlblif ltreafing
RCIVED
JUL tr 1
2016
of Las Vegas
Dept. of Planning
'3Tty
ctw
If
you wish to
appropriate box
epartnent of
(702'' 464-7499.
ple.a,se oall(7O2)
protest or sppof on this request, check ll

retum this cad in an envelope with postage to the
at the address listed above, fax this side of this card to
would like to contact your Council Represenfative,
ISS+A8+,|V-89+4
pace n card for your comments.
Please use
Planning
Case: GP464838
13807817109
&
ABMEN
FSPARZA STEVE
9401 MT GHERIE #10i1
I\ -1I I oPPoSE
IJ thi+Request
I
GPA-64838 &
.ran
IPP.I-647921
-i,r$.&
"r#{+t39}$*
r.
'
f,1,,
f,, l ll,,
ff''
Itltfll'lll' ff'lfl" lf"ff "ll' "lltt'tl'll
lq-1?
RCIVD
JUL
City of Les Vegas

Depaament ofFl*nning
Iferelopmet Services Centsr
331 Noflh Rrncho Drive. 3d Flanr
Las legul Nevada 89106
11
2016
c/.
L rf
t tt f-
/4
n
zcf
PflSRT
LctrJ
a- tvg t c/
t. t2ttt
{, Vfl?rt t t
City of Las Vegas

ept. of Planning
ftvtf
8-
ehlrn Serdce Requesttd

Offieial Notice of Pnblic l{earing
-n
RtAsor- PrarJ f
fIRSTTI..SS
l.ilATL
U,S. Postage
PAI
Las Vegas,
llV
GI
Pemit$o.1g
t-
y - g7t?t)'@ttt t/ it:il_/
ttt+.1 kr<.-, ,r-r
7 - Ptr'sct,
P-srrlJire
zt*-tt
e{f-,< 4
:,
-:.,* 'f rt FCt c* - 12 'Fc.rlt-t Lr J
cm
fJ!
tity llall
cf1l
you +ish 1o file yout protest r spoft on this rcq$sl, check the
rppoflrite boli belor and return ths card n an envelope wilh postage ro the
13807B1T26
Deprtment of Planning at the address listed abore, fax this side of this card to
0?) 44-7499. If -vou would like to contct your Council Eepres,enttvB,
please call (70X) ??9-64t5.
I SUPPORT
thir Requrst
zm
z
casa: GPA-64*B
tr
SINGER FONALD STUFT & DONNA J

g4T1 MT BRT VE {+1D3
LS VEGAS NV 89123.75T1
-J
I OPPSE
lhis Requtsl
hJ
hJ
Please use availble blank spce 0n card for your comclets
NJ
cp.64838 & ZON-4839 LPRI-64792I

ptann n g co mmi
ssi
on
*tSH
"
f,l,f.$
}'f
tTl
i*,
J:
:;*3
Ilrltlllli l' !tf,ft, llfj {f,', llf,lt
'
ll !ll ll lt Ji.'1
tsl
I' l, I
f'
ru
l:
t-
Lrl
tJ
ts
ts
tr
g
tS
Lft
-tr
ll
Iq.L?
City ol Las Vegas
PRSRT
l)epartment of Planning
Development Scrvices Center
Las Vegas, Nevada 89 I 06
FIRST CLASS MAIL
U.S. Poslage
PA ID
Las Vegas, NV
Permit No, '1630

REClvD
JUL
11
2016
Citv of Las Vegas

Pe'Pt. ot Planning
u?t
City
llall
^l'l
ryHll
l(ii6lp
Il
you wish to lle your protest or suppon on this rquest, check
the
appropriate box below and return this card in an envelopc with postage to thc
Depanment of Planning at lhe ddress listed abovc. lix this side ol this card to
(702) 464-7499.
If you would like to contact your
please call (7 02) 729 -6405.
l-l r srrPPoRr lVl

L-l tntr Requesr l\l
case: GPA-64838
13807817106
KOPPNAAL THEODORE J & LINDA A

9333 MT CHERIE VE #103
LAS VEGAS NV 89129
Council Representalive,
oPPosE
tnis Request
GpA-64838 & ZON-6483e [PRJ-64792]

Planning commission tH"t#?t$,'$-
If
',
,',,, l,f ,, l,lll l 1,'f
'1,
lll,
l, ll
"
fI
ll, il, n' lll t
-7nP
City of Las Vegas
PBSR
I)epartment of Planning
Development Services Center
FIRST CLASS MAIL
U.S, Postage
PA ID
Las Vegas, NV
Permit No. 1630

RECruED
JUL
11 2016
City of Las Veaas

Dept. of ptanriing
f\
6
City
llall
^'l
Cty H:l
tmli6
fr4p
5tut
ll
you wish o file your protest or support on this request, check
the
appropriate box below and relum this card in an envelope wth postage to rhe
Department ol Planning at the address listed above, lix this side ol'this cal to
vour Council Representative.
('102) 461-7499. If you
like to
please call (702) 229-6405.
I SUPPORT
I OPPOSE
this Request
this Request
Please use available blan
GPA-64838 & ZO
Pl anni n g commi ssion
ti
rsgo7gr7o95
case: GPA'&838
ERNST CYNTHIA
card for your comments.
792)
g"t l,4*f$lpi= i;?,s
,, tf
ill,l,lllt lll ll, nu,,llnllt, ylt,,t " rllll,l,,lllt ltl
Ict-?g?
City
o.f Las Vegas

Departrnent ol Planning
Dcvelopment Scrviccs Centcr
PRSRT
FIRST CLASS lvlAlL
U.S. Poslage
PAID
Las Vegas, NV
Permit No. 1630

RECEIVED
JUL
e 6tt
11 2016
Oitt of Las
Dept. of Plann
A
N
t4lim'*
Oty Hall
tf you wish to lle your protest or
supporl on this rquest, check the
appropriate hox below and retum this card in an envelope with postage to the
Department ol' Planning at the address listed above, lax this side ol'this card to
"*...(702) 464-1499. ll'you would like to contact your Council Rcpresentative,
please call (7O2) 229 -6405.
ISUPTRT
this Request
Please use available
cse: GPA'&838
I OPPOSE
this Requcst
space on card for your comments.
GPA-6483E & ZON-483e [PRJ-64792J

Pranning comrnission
i3ao7g.r7o1g
MORTON PAUt E & JANET M

9321 MT BRET AVE #103
M$'"rrfl,try?,91.9..
J.
;,
,l'fl',1,lllll'lt'tllflll'ltl'lllll'l'l'ryltu'llilul'rlrt
\cl-??
RECHV
JUL n 1
City of Las Vegas

l)evclopment Services Center
313 Norrh Rancho l)rve. 3'd Floor
216
PRSRT
FIRSTCLASS MAIL
U.S. Postage
Oitv of Las Vegas

De-Pt. ot Planntng
PA ID
Las Vegas, NV
Permit No. 1630

Tfrl
llall
./Z/
S t.!
Il' you wish to l'ilc your
protcst
or suppof on this
request. chcck the
appropriate box below and return this card in an envelope with pos(age to the
Department ol'Planning at the address listed above. l'ax this side o1- this card to
QA 4&-7499. Il you would like 1o contact your
please call ('102) 229-6445
I SUPPORT
thi.s Request
13go7gi7o9g
case: GPA-64838
SCHWARTZ DONALD & LOIS F

21 SNFOBD RD
SPRINGS CO 80906-4219
4+@-:(J
@;,'r;x,
Please use available blank space on cald fo r your commenlst_O7( 4;d0.a- t
GPA-64838 & ZON-4839 lPRl -647 921

PlanningCommissionMeetlngof J.,#.,-P,&l*,
gl:;l:,i
rlltrrh,r,,
l*-/7P"',7k',1/1
r,tf
lh
ll,lfrr,t,t'f'lllf lll,l,llt ltl',, lllllt'llf l
\ct-?9?
'qANT,'.$$4
ca g,
'06:a.JL'16
City of Las Vcgas

Departmen! of Planning
Development Serviccs Ccnter
333 r.*onh Rancho l)rivc. 3'd Floor
Las Vegas, Ncvada 89106
PRSBT
FIRST CLASS MAIL
U.S. Postage
FT4 L
PAID
Las Vegas, NV
Permil No. l630

RECEIVED
JUL
Hall
i 1 2016
City of Las Vegas

Plarung
^tl
-D_ept._of
Holl
}'
ll'
yoLr wish
to f ilc your
protest
or supporl on this
rcqucst. check thr:
appropriatc box bclow and relurn this card in an cnvclo: with postage to thc
Departnrent of Planning ilt the ddress listed above. lrx thi. side oi this card to
QA 464-7499. ll you would like to contact your Council Representative.
please call (7 02) 2?9 -6405.
I SUPPORT
this Rcquest
38r 71 1 0052
Cse: GPA-&838
BORRIT.HANSEN INTER VIVOS TRUST

19 SON MORELL
LAGUNA NIGUEL CA 92677.8603
I OPPO.SE
this Rcqucst
GpA.64838 & ZON-64E39 [PRJ-4792]

Planning Cournrission Meeting of ill2/2O16
;;;i;
i:ri;...,
t.
;;;i-:
'flfllf ''f''lllll,'f"l'lf 'flllllf
llll',t'fllllf rl'll'
lq-?::?
City ol Las Vegas
PRSRT
331 Nonh Rancho Drive. 3d Flrxrr
FIRST CI.ASS L4AIL
U.S. Postage
PA ID
Las Vegas, NV
Permit No. 1630

RECEIVED
JUI--l 1
Cry Hll
2016
City of l-as Vegas

Dept. of Planning
A
t
City Hall
L6Ip
ll' you wish to lle your
protcst or support on this request, check the
Depanment oi Planning at the address lislcd above. fax this side of this card to
(702) 464-1499. Il you would like lo contact your Council Representative,
please call (702) 229 -6405
I SUPPORT
I OPPOSE
this Request
this Requst
Please use available
Slo JGL u
card for your comrnents.
GPA-6483E & ZON-6483e [PRi-64792]

Planning Conmission *e,"Si
13go7g170g6
"rJ,,T?rrfl,,
l:':'
J-.f '3
case: GPA'64838
REBMAN FAMILY TRUST

REBMAN GARY S & MABILYN DTRS
9424 MI CHRIE AVE UT 103
LAS VEGAS NV 89129
n, I
lt n I r
il vt iltl ill
ll,
t, rt rtr
ll, rt,, \,,t Fu
ll
lq:??
t ox' fu-et
tila rrrt
RECEryED
PRSRT
FIRSTCTJASS MAIL
U.S. Postage
PAI
Las Vegas, NV
Permit No, 1630
!lall
D6tt
A
llH0
Cry
tsd Mp
t hf
(702) 464-7499. If you would likc to contact your Council Representatve,

please cal I
('1
GITERSONKE DONALO & MARY M

933{ MI CHER|E AVE #101
O2l 229 -6405.
I SUPIRT
this Request
I OPPOSE
this Rcqucst
Please use available blank space on carcl for your cgmments.
cpA-64838 & ZON-6483e [PRJ-64792}

PlanningCommissionte,.$ig"tJ,.r*.tr,91$"
er:' .dr
tf
,lff
I tf
l,t,
1,,
iltlilt,, tl h t,, ttf l,f lh,
tt f tf
I,
t.,r tf rl,
lq-zpP
Jity of
bs
Vegas
PRSRT
FRST CLASS M.AIL
)epartment of Planning
)evelopmenr Services Center
133 Nonh Rancho Drive. 3d Floor
U.S. Postoo
PIDLas Vegas, NV
Prmit No, f630
-as Vcgas. Ncvd 8910

OfTcial Notice of Public Hearng
REGIV
JUL
11
2016
Oity of Las Vegas

Dept. of Planning
A
t
Ott Hdl
lsl61
att Urll
prote$ or suppon on his rcquest, check lhe

rppropriate box bclow and return this card in an cnvelope wth postage to the
)cpanmnt of Planning at the address listed atnvc, fax this side of this card to
'.702) 464-7499. lf you would like lo contsct your Council Representative.
.f you wish to lle your
KACENSKY WILLIAM
GUO ZHUNZHUN
93OO FRESH SPHING DR
LAS VEGAS NV 8OI3I
rtea.sc cal I (702) 229 -4,05.
Case: GPA4838
1381 851 1036
SUPPoRT IS.,I TOPPOSE

Request l\ rhis Requcst
this
Please use availabte blank spa-ceon card for your comrfents.
cpA-64838 & ZON-64E39 [PRJ-64792I

,r
Planning Commission
"ri,Eg
l$,#Hr9r* ,
sis4
lf
lr
l,l,t lt f , f f fl',t ft llf tlt ff f ll, ll,

'
l,
ll'f
','
Ilt,llul{l
Dear Members of the Department of Planning:

proposed
My wife and I live across the street of Cheyenne in Sun City from the property adjacent to the
Boos Development GrouP, lnc.
We strongly oppose their general plan development to change the O (office) to SC (service commerciaf ).
We purchased our home located on 9300 Fresh Spring Drive here in Las Vegas, zip 89134, in May of
2015. Our reason for disproval of said development are for the reasons, as follow'..
Noise, the 7 eleven is a constant reminder of such a development, which is adjacent on Fort
Apache Rd. to the Boos proposed site, Drunken people at night, yelling, cars peeling out, engines
rewing from kids racing and showing off. Driving too fast. I have seen a lot of accidents here.
1.
2.
3.
Lights, the post signs are very tall and are intrusive.
property value, noise, lights, and general development of these type of commercial property will
lower our neighborhood property values.
quiet,
Bottom line, office buitdings are adjacent to this Boos development site on Fort Apache Rd. Their
that is more
non-invasive and reasonable with sign height. lmportantly, a O (office) will allow a service,
community'
of
our
development
beneficial for the surroundng
Sincerely,
Williarn Kacensky
DatetOT/O6|2OL6
l\,-?p ?
City of Las Vegas
PRSRT
Department ol' Planning

Development Services Ccnrer
333 North Rancho Drivc. 3d Floor
Las Vegas. Ncvad 89 I 06
FIRST CLASS fuIAIt
U.S. Postage
PAID
Las Vegas, NV
Permt No. 1630
RECEIVED

216
City of Las Vegas

Dept. of Planning
6tt
City Hall
4l5S
If you wish to file
JUL tr 1
your protcst or support on this rcqursr, check
the
appropriate box below and rcturn this card in an envelope with postage to the
Depafnrent ol Planning a{ the ddress listed above. I'ax rhis.side of rhis card to
(702) 464-7499. If you would like ro contact your Council Represenrarive.
please cal I (7 02) 229 -64A5.
I OPPOSE
I SUPPORT
this Request
38078
7005
Case: GPA-64838
SIEMER GERD H
VALDEZ BARBARA A
9301 MT CASHAVE #I01
LAS VEGAS NV 89129
this Request
GpA-64838 & ZON-64839 [PRJ-64792]

Prannin g com m ss i on
tT,,,.f t
,,
l&.1&%,0"
rrJ. !, i ;i s
l' I l l, il ' t,,' l il,',
l iltll ,1,' l y, [!,,flt,tlll,,ll,'
tt
1,q-? P
City of Las Vcgas

Dcpartmcnt of Planning
Dcvclopment Services Center
333 Nonh Rancho Drive.3'd Floor
PRSRT
FIRSTCLASS MAIL
U.S. Poslage
PA ID
Las Vcgas, Nevada 891 06
Las Vegas, NV
Permit No. 1630

Offcial Notice of Public Hearin bg
RECEIVED
JUL
\
6tt
City of Las Vegas

Dept. of Planning
^
N
cry Hll
!+l s6
ll'
11 216
you wish to lle your prolest or support on rhis rcqut:sr, chcck
the
apprtrpriutc box below and rclurn this card in an envelope with postage to the
Depanment ol Planning at rhe addrcss lisrecl above, fa.r this side olrhis card ro
('102) 46tl-7499. Il you would like to conracr your Council Rcpresenrarive.
please ca I I (7 02) 229 -6405.
1
l-l
I
suPPoRr ltoPPosE
Requesr l( I this Requesr
this
Please use avalable blank space on card for your comments.
380781 7001
Case: GPA-64838
SIEMER
VALDEZ
9301 MOUNT CASH AVE #101
GPA-64838 & ZON-6483e [pRJ-64792]

Planning Conrmission Meeting of 7ll2l20l6
i;
rrrr;,:i'r
r: ,s J s
Ilil,ttlnillllilJl'lllff"lllfhf'fll'rf lftl ilnl'1,'lll'
lcl-u?
RECEIVD
JUL
City ol'Las Vegas
l)cpartment of Planning
l)cvclopnrent Services Ccnter
333 North Rancho l)rivc. 3'd Floor
I 1 2016
Oity of Las Vegas

Dept. of Planning

t,,.,- u^t-L
.lyt
.YLo*{t-
-r 4'
/LfB*'
ll' you wish to lle your prolest or support on this rcquest. chcck the
rppropriate box below an<J return this clrd in an envelope wth posta_uc to the
Dcpartment ol'Planning at the address li.stcd above. l'ux this side of this cur<l to
(702i 464-7499. If'you would like to contct your Council Representative.
plcase call (1021 229-6405.
I SUPPORT
this Rcquest
PAID
c,J4t
Las Vegas, NV
Permit No. 1630
'
fn1 'R'*'l-1e
/LLa4f .. ,,,^ ol .s .P
"t*h
,d- a
a ,-
(M..t, CAtA, /.'-L

ryth
PRSBT
FIRSTCLASS MAIL
U.S. Poslage
errlfj" E Ut-
rtr
tt
al,-u- a<r-t'-
V"t4-l''L u;JlJ-
,/bl-?ct-
3..rwt-r-L-
/U""- l\utut^
r3Bo7Br7064
case: GPA-9838
MARRET.SADOWSKY=HELENE TRUST
MRBE-SADOWSKY HELENE TRS
I OPPO.SE
this Requcst
LAS VGAS NV 89129.7583
GPA-64838 & ZON-64E39 [PRJ-64792]

Planning Commission Meeting of 7ll2l?016
i :fr'ji
f.I;;it,';if;:
J. S l;?'C
hil| t lilt,u,,
l,
t,,,,,
t,
ilqu rrr r
I t 1,, il|,, ill l' I uil
l\-?9?
City of Las Vegas
PRSBT
FIRSTCLASS MAIL
U.S, Postage
Depanrnent of Planning
Devcloprncnt Scrvices Ccnter
333 North Rancho l)rive. 3td Floor
PA ID
Las Vegas, NV
Pemit No.'1630

RECEIVD
JUL
Cry Hall
11 2016
City of Las Veqas

Dept. of Ptann'ing
A
it
<ty lllll
L6im Mp
If
you wish to fle your protest or supporl on lhis request, check
rhe
appropriate box below and return this card in an enveloxr with posrage to the
Department of Planning at the address listed above, fax rhis side ol'this card to
(102) 464-7499. If you would like to contact your Council Reprcsentative,
plerse call (7O2) 229 -6405 I SUPPORT
this Rcquest
138o7g17o6s
case: GPA-64838
PEBEZ RICARDO & VICKI MORGAN

9320 MT CASH #f02
LAS VEGAS NV 89129
I OPPOSE
this Request
GpA-64838 & ZON-64839 [pRJ-64792]

ptanning Commission M","f
g,l*,3?lruer
, J F
lllr,lf
r, rl
r,,,1
lill,lll, t,lilll,,,t ilnt,llllutllt,,
ilt t,,,r
l\'1-o (
City of Las Vcgas
PRSRT
l)epartrnent ol' Planning

Devclopment .Scrvices Center
333 Norrh Rancho l)rive, 3'd Floor
Las Vegas, Ncvad 89106
FIRST CLASS MAIL
U.S, Postage
PAID
Las Vegas, NV
Permit No. 1630

RECIVED
JUL
2016
tity of Las Vegas

6tl
City Hall
Dept. of Pl annng
A
N
Ciry
lhll
If yoir u'ish to fle your protsst or supporl on this rcqest, check the
appnlpriate box below and return this card in an envelope u'ith pos{a_uc to the
Depaflnrent ol Planning at the acldress listed abor.e, fax this side of this card to
(702) 464-7499. lf'you would like to contact your Council Reptcsentative.
ple:rsc call QA 229 -6405.
I SUPPORT
this Rcquest
The noise, odors and traffic generated

by the proposed develoPment of a
Jiffo Lube and a De! Taco restaurant
will be detrimental to our peaceful
communty
Property values will drop because of the
aforementioned problems, and for
many in the communitY, our homes
ue our only asset.
Please deny the request for rezoning
from O to C-1. Thank you.
138o7g17oo2
cas: GPA-'1838
BORDEFS LILLIAN G 1997 FAM TR

BOFIDERS LILLIAN GRACE TRS
9301 MT CASH AVE #I02
t OPPOSE
this Request
GpA-64838 & ZON-64839 [PRJ-64792]

Planning Commission Meeting of 7ll2/2A16
i;
r:'r,,:ir'ii3
' i.
lfllf
lllllllllll'lll"ll'lfll,lllfl'lll'l'lllllf llll'll'''"1
\q-'7 ?
City of Las Vegas
PRSRT
Depanrnent ol Plnnning
Development Serviccs Center
Nonh Rancho l)rivc. 3'd Floor
Las Vcgas. Nevada 89106
FIRST CLASS MAIL
U.S. Poslage
l3l
PAID
Las Vegas, NV
Permil No. 1630

Ofl'icial Notice of Public Hebring
RECIVED
JUL
\
t()6tt
I 1 2016
City of Las Vegas

Dept. of Planning
llall
5*9
ll
you *'ish to llc your protes! or suppo on this reque.sl, chcck
the
appropriate box below cnd rerum this card in an envelope with postagc lo the
Depanment of Plannin,e t the address listcd above, fax this side of this card to
(702) 464-7499, ll'you would like t contact your Council Reprcscntativc,
plcase call (7 02) 229-6405.
I SUPPORT
I OPPOSE
this Requcst
this Request
Please use available blank space on card for your conments
13807817054
case: GPA-64838
KNOWLES LIVING TRUST

KNOWLES ELMAR M TRS
9401 MT CASH AVE S1O1
GpA-64838 & ZON-64839 [PRJ-64792]

Planning Commission Meeting of 7/1212016
.?
:?ij];i'{p:
f fr f ^85
ll l, l',,t I' I lt ll,l'l,llll,l
il'l'l'lll, n tl l, ilil\',lltl
lq-?p ?
City of Las Vegas

Departmcnt of Planning
PRSRT
FIRSTCI-ASS MAIL
U.S. Postaoe
Dcvclopment .lervices Cente

333 North Rancho l)rive, I'd Floor
Las Vegas. Nevada 89 I 06
PAIDLas Vegas, NV
Permit No. 1630

REEIVED
iul I 1 2016
Clty of Las Vegas
D_ept,9f Planning
Cry
Hall
A
I'l
(lty ltoll
Ldli6ltp
lf'you
rvish
to file your
protest
or suppon on this
request, check the
appropriutc box below and rctum this card in an envelope with pos{age to the
Departmcnt ol Planning at the address listcd above. fax this side of this card to
(702) 464-7499. If you would like to contact your Council Representative,
please call (7 02) 229 -6405.
I SUPPORT
his Request
i3go7g17o7g
case: GPA-g838
D M P SEPARATE PROPERIY TRUST

PATUBZO DENISE M TRS
2912 STERLING COVE DR
LAS VEGAS NV 89f28-7749
IOPPOSE
this Request
Please use available blank space on card for your conments.
GpA-64838 & ZON-64839 [PRJ-64792]

Planning commission
*:'"Sig
"tl+?{','*4,!..f*
r. r: r;i,
rr rf
/,,,
r, r,
fi ,l,l,l l,
I lllll\n,,
4 tlilt
ltt
tl
tq-?9?
REGEIVED
JUL tr 1
ol./
City ol'Las Vegas
Depannrent of Planning
Dcvclopmcnt Sen'iccs Ccrlcr
333 North Rancho Drivc, 3d Floor
{//}-
2016
eity of Las Vegas

Dept. of Pl anning
afu-{
PRSRT
FIRSTCLASS MAIL
U.S. Postage
P ID
/A)
Las Vegas, NV
Permit No. 130
Return Service
Offcial Notice of Public
6tt
4-rIf you wish to lle your protest or suppon on this
chcck the
rppropriate box betow and return this card in an envelope with

to the
Department of Planning at the address lisled above, lax this side of'this card to
(102\ 464-7499. Il you would like to contacl your Council Rcprcsctaii,'e,
12527610037
plcasc cal I ('l 02) 229-6405.
I SUPPORT
this Request
Case: GPA-64834
BONDS LYNN B REVOCABLE TRUST

BONDS LYNN B TRS
P O BOX 26027
I OPPOSE
this Request
GpA-64834 & 2ON.64833 [PRJ-64769]
ptanning Commission tvteeting,ofy'/ffif,,$i.ir*
r: fi . :,"i
tlt il
t\
T | | It lll4 il'
Ilt l' \ tll'll.ll tl t t',' illlt " H
lT.zn 7
City of Las Vcgas

Dcpanment ol Planning
PRSRT
FIRSI CLASS MAIL
Development Serviccs Centcr

331 North Rancho Drive.3d Floor
Las Vegas. Nevada 89 1 06
U.S- Poslage
PAID
Las Vegas, NV
Permit No. 1630

Official Notice of Public llearing-
REEHVD
JUL tr 1
2016
City of Las Vegas

Dept. of Planning
\ wtt
4tt&9
lf
you wish to tlle your protst or suppon on this requcst. check
the
appropriate box below and return this canl in an envelope with postage to tbe
Departmenl o[ Planning at the addrss listed above, fax this .side of this card to
(102) 464-1499. ll you would like lo contact your Council Representativcplease call 0A 229-6405.
l- rsuPPoRr 7
l-l rhis Request \l
13go781z062
case: GPA-64438
DORSEY DONALD SR & HABRIET

roPPosE
this Request
GP-64838 & ZON-64839 [PRJ-64792]

Plan'ing commission tffl$r."tfl,H,,,$t,*,:'
l ^s
'r
lr
lll
',ff,l
,lltltl,,llll',1fll
l,
'
lll'f'f,lff,' 'f',1
\a,.lp?
City of Las Vcgas
PRSBT
Depanmcnt of Planning
Developmcnt Serr'ices Center
Las Vegas. Ncvada 89106
FIRST CLASS MAIL
U.S, Poslage
PA ID
Las Vegas, NV
Permil No. 1630

Official Notice of Public Hering
RECTVED
l0 rt
JUL
tl
City Hall
A
t{
Cry
Hlll
l,lM,-fl
s lh ft
1 2016
City of Las Vegas

Dept. of Planning
If
you wish to file your protc.sl or suppon on rhis rcquest. chcck thc
appropriatc box below and return this card in an envelcpe with postagc to thc
Dcpannrcnt ol'Planning at the address listed above. lix this side of this card to
(iO2) 464-7499. lf you would like to contc{ your Council Represcntativc,
plcnsc cal l (1 02) 229 -6405.
I
I
I rsuPPoRT
I
this
Request
f\ ,/ roPPosE
lZ!-J this Rcquc.st
13go78'r7011
case: GPA'9838
DAVIES DAVID F III

93OO MT CHERIE AVE #102
LASVEGASNV 89129.7559
Please use available blank space on card for yorrr comments-
GpA-64838 & zON-64839 [PRJ-64792]

Planning Commission Meeting of 7l12/2016
f r fiir:ii'i:J. ,i J: 9
,tll tl, tl f ,,llt,,l, ll,l,
ff
'1,
l,
,,
[\,ll ,11'l ,l'il tl"
lq-'|?
City ol'Las Vegas
PRSRT
FIBSTCLASS MAIL
U.S. Postage
Devclopment Services Center
3-13 n{onh Rancho l)ive. 3d Floor
Las Vcgas. Nevado 89106
PA ID
Las Vegas, NV
Permit No. 1630

RECETVED
iul I I
2016
City of Las Vegas

Dept. of Planning
lf
yt'ru wish
to lle your
protest
or suppon on this requc.\r. chcck
the
appropriate box hclow and return this card in an envelope with posta_ue to the
Depaf menl of Planning at the addrcss listed abovc. lax this side of this card to
{70 4e-7499. ll you would like lo contact your Council Representative.
please call (7 02) 229 -6405.
I SUPPORT
this Request
13807817007
Case: GP4.64838
THYEF DONNA L
9301 MT CHERIE AVE.#IOT
I OPPOSE
-'
this Request
Please use available blank space on card for your conlnents
GpA-64838 & ZON-483e [PRJ-64792]

Planning Commisson Meeting of 1ll2l20l6
i. trri:t;i'ii: i
r, til tttt ut,, t il, l, tt'tt,f l, U,, illl Un,l l r lf lf I I r, r i rf

r
lq-1p ?
City ol Las Vcgas
PRSRT
l)cpartment ol' Planning

I)evelopment Services Ccntcr
313 North Rancho Driyc. 3'd Floor
FIRST CLASS MAIL
U.S. Poslage
PAID
Las Vegas, Ncvacla 89106
Las Vegas, NV
Permit No. 1630

RECETVED
JUL tr 1
(ity Hall
lo6tt
City of Las Vegas

Dept. of Planning
^H
cty lott
lq6l{p
ll'you
wish to fle your protest or suppor{ on this request. check
thc
appropriate box below and return his card irr an envelopc with postage to thc
Depaf.ment ol'Planning at the atltlrcss listed above. fax this side ol this card to
(702) 464-7499. ll you would likc to contact your Council Rcprescntativc.
plcase calf (7 02) 229 -6405
ISUPPOIT
r oPPos.
this Request
this Request
2Oi6
for your commenls
1ggo7g17o4g
cse: GPA"B'838
FARREN FAMILY TFUST

FARBEN RUTH J RS
GpA-64838 & ZON-64E39 [PRJ-64792]

t i.i: ,:.ii:1':'it:'
ci'
I'lfllnil'tll'flflillfi\"llllll"lllllllilllililll'lill
\u,-'lo
City of Las Vegas

Deprtmcnt of Planning
PRSBT
FIRS CI-ASS MAIL
U.S. Postage
RECETVED
Developrncnl Services Center

333 Nonh Rancho t)rive. 3'd Floor
PA ID
juL 11 2016
Las Vegas, NV
Pemil No.'1630

Citv of Las Vegas
Official Notice of Public Hearing oe'pt. ot Planning
,4
1il,tr
"tt
L la no l- ol.r.
hee
tv^
\
m6tt
a(
ll' you wish to llc your prorcst or supporl on thi.s rcquest.
chcck
appropriate box bclow and retum this card in an envelope with postuge to the
Dcpartmcnt of Planning at the addrcss listed above, fax this sicle of this carcl ro
('702) 464-'1499. If' you would like lo contact your Council Represcntative.
please call (7 02) 229 -6405.
r
suPPORr JV
Requcst l\
this
ct re
lvlf r
tbe
rTvesf
eolnê-.!
iv't
a9]l H$Jl
I-l
"uiH',
-f-ttiS
o c(ru& Pro,n o3e *e

N
Clty )ldl
LBs l.p
[-l
r sl J e{s
ur (,onztttu-n*f
Lo n cct^ he
15. S lre
r^
13go7g17o3B
a-a
case: GPA'64838
SHERMAN STUART J & C REV LIV TR

SHERMAN STUART J & CYNTHIA F TRS
LAS VEGAS NV 89.I29.7573
roPPosE
this Request
GPA-64838 & ZON-64839 [PRJ-64792]

Planning commission Mt*{.tf3f'$i'f,r-
i {t
lf
I,f f ,,,, I t,, t,
lll | il,,,, It, illt,\ il tl, u, ill tl|I,, , l,,l
\Q-l> ?
-l
PRSRT
FIBST CLASS MAIL
U.S. Postage
PAID
Las Vegas, NV
Permit No. 1630

RECEIVD
JiJr x I
A
ttty of Las Vegas
il
6ty Brl
tq:
2016
Dept. of planning
Mp
Jfr!
If you wish to file your prtest or support on this requesi! chr:ck the
appropriate box below and rcturn this curd in an envclope with postagc to the
Dcpartmcnt olPlanning r the ddrcss listed above. lax this side olrhi.s card ro
(702) 464-7499. Il'you woulcl like to contac( your Council Represcntative.
please crll (7 02) 229 -6405.
EL.":,"":i
case: GPA'il838
13g07817074
HUGHES CHABLES H & STELLA M

i,'?,'i",
GPA-64838 & ZON-6483e [PRJ-64792]

i E!5
[,r".r=
l,l,
t,
1,,1, nt,,
ilnil|il
ll, ll,t, lll ill,
il,1
il
tf
lt
IIII
\cr-zP?
City of Las Vegas
PFSRT
l)cparnent of' Ptannng

Development Scrviccs Center
333 Nonh Rancho Drive. 3d Floor
FIRST CLASS MAIL
U.S. Postaoe
PAIO-
Las Vegas, NV
Pemill No. 1630

*OfTieial. Notice.ot P.u_blig HeaI*
RECEIVD
JUL 1 1
6tt
City
llatl
2016
City of Las Vegas

Dept. of Planning
A
N
Cty H ll
t6tim i.tp
aq; &h
st
Il' you wish to file your protesl or suppo on this
requesr, check rhe

appropriate box below and return this card in an envelope with poslage to lhe
Departnrent ol Planning at the address listed bove. fax this side ol rhis card ro
(702) 464-7499.
If
13go7gr7o3s
you would like !o contact your Council Represenrative.
please cal I (7 02). 229-6405.
l-l
l-l
suPPoRr l{71
rnis
Request l\l
case: GPA-64838
ESHOO MARTIN D & CHARLENE O

ESHOO MARTIN O & CHARLENE BEV TR
9437 MT BRET AVE #103
oPPosE
rhis Rcquest
GpA-64838 & zON-6483e [PRJ-64792J

Planning Conrnrission
t?"ti*
otJ,,#.#&t,UrO
, s J. s
Il,
ui' lltl il t l,f , ll r, il r, r r tll t tl I t|il,il l, t,,, llt, lr

t
\\-7PP
City of Las Vegas
PBSRT
Department ol' Planning

Devclopment Services Center
333 Nonh Rancho Drive. 3'd Flour
Las Vegas. Ner,ada 89106
FIRST CLASS MAIL
U.S. Poslage
PA ID
Las Vegas, NV
Permil No. 1630

RECETVD
A
JUL
cJtyHdl
tb
rrldp
this requcst.
please call (702)
229-6105.
' .':---'
I SUPPORT
OPPOSE
this Request
this Request
2016
Dept. of Ptanning
checkf the
appropriate hox bclow and return this card in an en velopc with postage td the
Depaf ment of Planning at the address listed above, l'ax this siclc ol this caid to
(702) 464-7499. lf' you would like to conl.ct your Council
tity of Las Veoas
,9' i n$
If you wish to lle your protest or suppn on
tr
j3go78r7o7s
cse:GPA'&838
FATIGATO GELA TFIUST

RINELLA JAMES C & GLORIANN TRUST
O/"A FATIGATO TBS
1216 W FLOURNOY
cHtcAGo lL 0607
GpA-64838 & ZON-4839 LPRJ,64792J

pt an
nin
g Com mi ssion
M..H
ofJ,/?.{2,
I lr,=
6 ir
:,:-:
nt, ltl, l,ll
il ilt tfi ilfi ilth,t
tlf ,f t,,,, I t,, r
W,t,h nh
lQLo?
il
City ol'Las Vegas
l/eit /n (Ro /os I r -
Fo *h'
nry^y sle;t /'4 I rc61'trzlt'oJ-'
Deparlment of Planning
Devclopment Services Ccnter
3ll Nonh Rancho Drive. 3'd Floor
Las Vcgas, Nevada 89106
4TVrzopn-t

Ape, lc
this Request
or suppon on this
PAID
Las Vegas, NV
Permit No. 1630
FLo*
,blqer.ye /.t/tkc
I t o't t
JUL
I 1 2016
Mrp
C'ity of Las Vegas
rcquest. chcck the
Dept. of Planning
Departnrent ol' Planning at the address listcd above, fax this sitte ol this card to
(1O2) 464-7499. lf you woulrl like to contact your Council Representarive.
plcasc call (702) 229-6405.
I SUPPORT
U.S. Postage
RECEIVD ^
N
(lTHll
protest
PRSBT
FIRST CLASS MAIL
4' g but*etsel
wo// c n teftfflc p/o bn Ad +Ae
City Hall
L(ari6
lf you wish to file your
e-
/ 4.r.rt to *E,t
F+
EW?t
case: GPA-64838
1ggo7gi6060
MON,AHAN JOSEPH A
9316 DEER LODGE LN
I OPPOSE
this Request
GPA-64838 & ZON-6483e [PRJ-4792]

Planning Comn.rission Metirs,of/*#2:,*lf=;:
fi J fi
lilt
lt. I4ll,\il,,,1,,, t lllr ll t ntl[,t il n llt ill | rlt

t
lu,-? 7
City ol'Las Vegas

Depanrncnl ofPlanning
PRSRT
FIRSTCljSS
Developmcnt Sen'iccs Center

333 Nonh Rancho l)rivc, 3'd Floor
MAIL
U.S. Poslage
PAID
Las Vegas, NV
.l630
Permit No.

OfTicial Notice of Public Hearing
REEEIVD
JUL
i 1 20i6
Oity of Las Vegas

Dept. of Planning
IO6tt
s51
If yp s,i5 to flc your
protest or support on this request, chcck thc

apprtrpriatc box belorv and return this card in an cnvclope with postage to thc
Departmcnt of Planning at the addrcss lisrcd bove,
this side of this card to
(102) 464-7499.
lf
you rvould likc ro conracr
Council Rcpresentativc
pleasercall
1
:,
ll
-:-
,l " rirl(il\rr
ir _
this Requcst
use av ailable blank
GPA-64838 &
.!
,il',r lkil(Fr\r
---,i
on
38078 1 7l 05
Case: GPA-64838
BEAUDOIN BARFY B
9333 MT CFIRIE AVE #102
for your comments.
IPRJ-64
Pfanning Commission Meeting of l/1212016
r';jtr : J r
'th'l'1il'llllltl'f 'il|',\ttt',|il|'r'ill'f fl,ltl'l.,l'lt
lq-b

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
ZON-64839 - REZONING RELATED TO GPA-64838 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT:
BOOS DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC. - OWNER: NEVADA STATE BANK - For possible
action on a request for a Rezoning FROM: O (OFFICE) TO: C-1 (LIMITED COMMERCIAL)
on 2.17 acres at the northwest corner of Cheyenne Avenue and Fort Apache Road (APN 138-07801-011), Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-64792]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
C.C.: 9/21/2016
261
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Consolidated Backup
Consistent with the Citys

sustainability efforts to reduce
paper use, backup
documentation pertaining to
related items will appear as
backup under the first item. This
item includes such consolidated
backup documentation. Please
refer to the first related
application in the subject line of
the Agenda Summary Page.
ZON-64839
ZON-64839

77 7
77AA 7A
77

7

76
6
b77b
b
b

A777A
77
7
77

7

77

77 7
77 7

77
7

b77b
b b
777
b 777b
b
b77
b 7b
b
77
b 77
7b
b
77
7

b
b 77

7b
b
77 ?

77
7
77 7

777 7?

77
7
7b
b 77

b
77 7
7 76
b 7
b77

6
6
b77 ?
b
77A
7b
7 7b
77

7
77 ?
A 7
77A7

7A 7 A7
77 A A
77A b A7b
77A 7b
77b 7
7
77
77 A 7b
7b 7A
AA
77 7
77 A
777 7
77Ab A7b
77A7b
77A7b
77b 7A
77 b
777 7
77AAb 7
77A7 7
77 7 7
77A 7b 7
77 7 7b
7A
777b
7
7777 7
7 77777777 7b
7 77 777 7
777 77777
7 7
77 7 7
b77
77 77

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
SUP-65273 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT RELATED TO GPA-64838 AND ZON-64839 PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: BOOS DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC. - OWNER:
NEVADA STATE BANK - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR A
PROPOSED AUTO REPAIR GARAGE, MINOR USE at the northwest corner of Cheyenne
Avenue and Fort Apache Road (APN 138-07-801-011), O (Office) Zone [PROPOSED: C-1
(Limited Commercial)], Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-64792]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
C.C.: 9/21/2016
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved, subject to conditions:
2. Location and Aerial Maps - SUP-65273, SDR-65272 and TMP-65348 [PRJ-64792]
4. Justification Letter - SUP-65273, SDR-65272 and TMP-65348 [PRJ-64792]
5. Protest/Support Postcards SUP-65273 and SDR-65272 [PRJ-64792]

paper use, backup
SUP-65273
SUP-65273
SUP-65273, SDR-65272 and TMP-65348
SUP-65273, SDR-65272 and TMP-65348
SUP-65273, SDR-65272 and TMP-65348
SUP-65273, SDR-65272 and TMP-65348

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
SDR-65272 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO GPA-64838, ZON64839,AND SUP-65273 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: BOOS DEVELOPMENT
GROUP, INC. - OWNER: NEVADA STATE BANK - For possible action on a request for a Site
Development Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED 8,580 SQUARE-FOOT GENERAL RETAIL
STORE, OTHER THAN LISTED; A 2,418 SQUARE-FOOT RESTAURANT WITH DRIVE
THROUGH WITH A WAIVER TO NOT ORIENT THE BUILDING TO THE CORNER
WHERE SUCH IS REQUIRED; AND A 3,115 SQUARE-FOOT AUTO REPAIR GARAGE,
MINOR WITH A WAIVER TO ALLOW SERVICE BAY DOORS TO FACE A PUBLIC
RIGHT-OF-WAY on 2.17 acres at the northwest corner of Cheyenne Avenue and Fort Apache
Road (APN 138-07-801-011), O (Office) Zone [PROPOSED: C-1 (Limited Commercial)], Ward
4 (Anthony) [PRJ-64792]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
C.C.: 9/21/2016
210
RECOMMENDATION:

paper use, backup
SDR-65272
SDR-65272

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
TMP-65348 - TENTATIVE MAP RELATED TO GPA-64838, ZON-64839, SUP-65273, AND
SDR-65272 - NWC CHEYENNE AVENUE AND FORT APACHE ROAD - PUBLIC
HEARING - APPLICANT: BOOS DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC. - OWNER: NEVADA
STATE BANK - For possible action on a request for a Tentative Map FOR A ONE-LOT
COMMERCIAL SUBDIVISION on 2.17 acres at the northwest corner of Cheyenne Avenue and
Fort Apache Road (APN 138-07-801-011), O (Office) Zone [PROPOSED: C-1 (Limited
Commercial)], Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-64792]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
C.C.: 9/21/2016
210
RECOMMENDATION:

paper use, backup
TMP-65348
TMP-65348
TMP-65348 - REVISED
TMP-65348 - REVISED
TMP-65348 - REVISED
TMP-65348 - REVISED
TMP-65348
TMP-65348

PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: AUGUST, 2016
DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
GPA-64786 - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/
OWNER: KULKA LAND, LLC - For possible action on a request for a General Plan
Amendment FROM: RNP (RURAL NEIGHBORHOOD PRESERVATION) TO: R (RURAL
DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) on 5.0 acres at the northwest corner of Elkhorn Road and Grand
Canyon Drive (APN 125-18-403-003), Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-64704]. Staff recommends
APPROVAL.
C.C.: 9/21/2016
27
RECOMMENDATION:
2. Conditions and Staff Report - GPA-64786, ZON-64787, WVR-64788, WVR-64789 and
TMP-64790 [PRJ-64704]
3. Supporting Documentation - GPA-64786, ZON-64787, WVR-64788, WVR-64789 and TMP64790 [PRJ-64704]
4. Photo(s) - GPA-64786, ZON-64787, WVR-64788, WVR-64789 and TMP-64790 [PRJ64704]
5. Justification Letter - GPA-64786, ZON-64787, WVR-64788, WVR-64789 and TMP-64790
[PRJ-64704]
6. Concern email and Protest/Support Postcards for GPA-64786 and ZON-64787 [PRJ-64704]
GPA-64786, ZON-64787, WVR-64788, WVR-64789 and TMP-64790 [PRJ-64704]

DEPARTMENT:
PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/ OWNER: KULKA LAND, LLC
CASE
NUMBER
GPA-64786
ZON-64787
WVR-64788
WVR-64789
TMP-64790
RECOMMENDATION
conditions:
conditions:
conditions:
REQUIRED FOR
APPROVAL
GPA-64786
GPA-64786
ZON-64787
GPA-64786
ZON-64787
GPA-64786
ZON-64787
WVR-64788
WVR-64789
** NOTIFICATION **
51
NOTICES MAILED
288 - GPA-64876 and ZON-64787

288 - WVR-64788 and WVR-64789
288 - TMP-64790
APPROVALS
1 - GPA-64876 and ZON-64787

3 - WVR-64788 and WVR-64789
0 - TMP-64790
PROTESTS
27 - GPA-64876 and ZON-64787

23 - WVR-64788 and WVR-64789
30 - TMP-64790
YK

Conditions Page One
** CONDITIONS **
WVR-64788 CONDITIONS
Planning
1.
Approval of and conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Tentative Map (TMP64790) shall be required, if approved.
2.
A Waiver of Title 19.02.240 to allow no street lighting on interior streets, where such is
required is approved.
3.
Planning
1.
Approval of and conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Tentative Map (TMP64790) shall be required, if approved.
2.
A Waiver of Title 19.04.070 to allow private streets to not meet minimum construction
standards as public streets, where such is required is approved.
3.
YK

Conditions Page Two
Planning
1.
2.
Approval of GPA-64786, ZON-64787, WVR-64788 and WVR-64789 shall be required, if

approved.
3.
Street names must be provided in accordance with the Citys Street Naming Regulations.
4.
5.
In conjunction with creation, declaration and recordation of the subject common-interest

community, and prior to recordation of the Covenants, Codes and Restrictions (CC&R),
or conveyance of any unit within the community, the Developer is required to record a
Declaration of Private Maintenance Requirements (DPMR) as a covenant on all
associated properties, and on behalf of all current and future property owners. The DPMR
is to include a listing of all privately owned and/or maintained infrastructure improvements,
along with assignment of maintenance responsibility for each to the common interest
community or the respective individual property owners, and is to provide a brief
description of the required level of maintenance for privately maintained components. The
DPMR must be reviewed and approved by the City of Las Vegas Department of Field
Operations prior to recordation, and must include a statement that all properties within the
community are subject to assessment for all associated costs should private maintenance
obligations not be met, and the City of Las Vegas be required to provide for said
maintenance. Also, the CC&R are to include a statement of obligation of compliance with
the DPMR. Following recordation, the Developer is to submit copies of the recorded
DPMR and CC&R documents to the City of Las Vegas Department of Field Operations.
6.
Statutes.
YK

Public Works
7.
Dedicate 50-feet of right-of-way for Elkhorn Road, 40-feet for Grand Canyon Drive and
30-feet for Solar Avenue. Additionally, dedicate a 25-foot radius on the southwest corner
of Solar Avenue and Grand Canyon Drive and a 30-foot radius with a Traffic Signal Chord
Easement at the northwest corner of Grand Canyon Drive and Elkhorn Road on the Final
Map for this site.
8.
Grant pedestrian access easements for all public sidewalk located outside of the public
right-of-way.
9.
Construct half street improvements on Elkhorn Road and Grand Canyon Drive meeting
complete street standards and construct Solar Avenue as shown on the approved site plan
adjacent to this site concurrent with the development. All existing paving damaged or
removed by this development shall be restored at its original location and to its original
width concurrent with development of this site.
10.
Private streets must be granted and labeled on the Final Map for this site as Public Utility
Easements (P.U.E.), Public Sewer Easements, and Public Drainage Easements to be
privately maintained by the Homeowners Association.
11.
Extend public sewer in Solar Avenue to the west edge of this site at a depth and location
acceptable to the Sanitary Sewer Section of the Department of Public Works concurrent
with the development of this site.
12.
The proposed 40-foot easement at the south end of Street A shall also be a Public Sewer
Easement and located entirely on a common lot.
13.
The proposed 20-foot Public Sewer Easement located at the north end of Street A shall
be located entirely on a common lot and centered over the sewer main which is to be
located 5-feet east of Street A.
14.
All landscaping and private improvements installed with this project shall be situated and
maintained so as to not create sight visibility obstructions for vehicular traffic at all
development access drives and abutting street intersections.
15.
Contact the City Engineers Office at 702-229-6272 to coordinate the development of this
project with the Rancho Road Storm Drain Elkhorn/Fort Apache to Grand Canyon
project, and any other public improvement projects adjacent to this site. Comply with the
recommendations of the City Engineer.
YK

16.
A working sanitary sewer connection shall be in place prior to final inspection of any units
within this development. Full permanent improvements on all major access streets,
including all required landscaped areas between the perimeter wall and adjacent public
street, shall be constructed and accepted by the City prior to issuance of any building
permits beyond 50% of all units within this development. All off-site improvements
adjacent to this site, including all required landscaped areas between the perimeter walls
and adjacent public streets, shall be constructed and accepted prior to issuance of building
permits beyond 75%. The above thresholds notwithstanding, all required Improvements
shall be constructed in accordance with Title19.02.130.D.
17.
Department of Public Works prior to the issuance of any building or grading permits, or
submittal of any construction drawings, or the recordation of a map, whichever may occur
first. Provide and improve all drainageways recommended in the approved drainage
plan/study. The developer of this site shall be responsible to construct such neighborhood
or local drainage facility improvements as are recommended by the City of Las Vegas
Neighborhood Drainage Studies and approved Drainage Plan/Study concurrent with
development of this site.
18.
As per Unified Development Code (UDC) 19.16.060.G, all requirements must be complied
with or such future compliance must be guaranteed by an approved performance security
method in accordance with UDC sections 19.02.130.C and 19.02.130.E.
19.
deviations from adopted City Standards shall be allowed unless specific written approval
for such is received from the City Engineer prior to the recordation of a Final Map or the
approval of subdivision-related construction plans, whichever may occur first. Approval of
this Tentative Map does not constitute approval of any deviations. If such approval cannot
be obtained, a revised Tentative Map must be submitted showing elimination of such
deviations.
YK

** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This is a proposed 17-lot residential subdivision on 5.00 acres of undeveloped land located at the
northwest corner of Elkhorn Road and Grand Canyon Drive. The Project requires a General Plan
Amendment (GPA-64786) from RNP (Rural Neighborhood Preservation) to R (Rural Density
Residential); a Rezoning (ZON-64787) from R-E (Residence Estates) to R-1 (Single Family
Residential); a Waiver (WVR-64788) to allow no streetlights where such are required; a Waiver
(WVR-64789) to allow private streets to be developed to non-public street standards behind a
gate; and a Tentative Map (TMP-64790). Staff supports the requested General Plan Amendment
and the Rezoning requests; however, as a result of the requested Waivers, staff does not support
the remaining three applications and recommends denial of the Waivers and Tentative Map.
ISSUES
A Waiver is required to allow internal streets to not have required street lights. Staff does
not support this request.
A Waiver is required to allow proposed private streets to not be designed and constructed
to public street standards as required. Staff does not support this request.
ANALYSIS
The applicant is requesting to amend the Centennial Hills Sector Plan land use designation from
RNP (Rural Neighborhood Preservation) to R (Rural Density Residential) and to rezone the
property from R-E (Residence Estates) to R-1 (Single Family Residential) for a future singlefamily, detached residential subdivision on 5.00 acres of undeveloped land on the northwest
corner of Elkhorn Road and Grand Canyon Drive. The proposed changes are appropriate and
compatible with adjacent land uses. The R (Rural Density Residential) land use and
corresponding R-1 (Single Family Residential) zoning district are appropriate buffering
designations between the larger Clark County residential properties on the west and north with
the higher density residential properties on the east and south side of the proposed site. Staff
supports these requests.
There has been a steady increase in the demand for single-family residential dwellings in the
Centennial Hills Sector Plan area. In 2014, 1,118 new building permits were issued for singlefamily homes and in 2015, 1,194 permits were issued for the same. This was a 6.8 percent
increase and this upward trend has continued into 2016. The demand for new housing permits
YK

city wide, was even greater at over 11 percent. The proposed land use and zoning for this
vacant, undeveloped 5.00 acre parcel will help meet this increased demand for new housing units
in the northwest portion of the City.
The applicant is proposing private streets that are not designed to public street standards as
required. This is problematic for the City if the proposed community should choose to turn the
streets over to the City to maintain in the future. The required Waiver to allow this is not
supported by staff.
In addition to proposing private streets that are not designed to public standards, the applicant is
also requesting to not install required lights on these streets. This does not foster a safe Walkable
Community that is one of the Citys goals. As a result, staff cannot support this Waiver that is
needed to allow no streetlights to be installed on the interior streets.
The submitted east/west cross sections depict maximum natural grade greater than 2% across this
site. Per the Tables in Subdivision Code 19.06.050 a development with natural slope greater
than 2%, is allowed a maximum 6-foot retaining wall. A 4.5-foot maximum retaining is shown
on the east property line and no retaining is shown on the west property line.
The submitted north/south cross section depicts maximum natural grade less than 2% across this
site. Per the Tables in Subdivision Code 19.06.050 a development with natural slope less than
2%, is allowed a maximum 4-foot retaining wall. A 3-foot maximum retaining wall is shown on
the north property line and a 2-foot retaining wall is shown on the south property line.
The Clark County School District projects that approximately seven primary and secondary
school students will be generated by this proposed development. Two of the three schools
serving the area (Sandra L Thompson Elementary School and Arbor View High School) are over
capacity for the 2015-16 school year. Edmundo Sr. Escobedo Middle School also serves the
area, but has not reached capacity.
In summary, staff supports the requested General Plan Amendment and Rezoning requests as
they are appropriate of the area. However, staff does not support the two requested Waivers or
the associated Tentative Map and recommends denial of these applications.
1.
The density and intensity of the proposed General Plan Amendment is compatible
with the existing adjacent land use designations,
YK

The proposed R (Rural Density Residential) General Plan designation is consistent with
the adjacent larger lot single-family residential land uses surrounding the subject site on
the north and west.
2.
The zoning designations allowed by the proposed amendment are compatible with the
existing adjacent land uses and zoning districts.
3.

Amendment; and
There are existing transportation, recreation, utility and other facilities that are adequate to
accommodate the uses and densities permitted by the proposed General Plan Amendment.
4.
The proposed amendment conforms to other applicable adopted plans and policies
that include approved neighborhood plans.
There are no other plans or policies that would be applicable to the site.
1.

The proposed R-1 (Single Family Residential) zoning district conforms to the proposed
General Plan Amendment related to this request.
2.
The detached single-family residential use that will be allowed on the subject site is at an
appropriate density with the surrounding properties and is therefore, compatible with the
residential uses and zoning designations of these surrounding properties.
3.
YK

As the local economic conditions improve, the City is seeing an increased demand for new
residential construction. New residential zoning districts at an appropriate density will
help meet this demand.
4.
Access to the property is provided off Grand Canyon Drive, identified as a 100-foot
Primary Arterial on the Master Plan of Streets and Highways. This has adequate capacity
to meet the traffic expected to be generated by this project.
FINDINGS (WVR-64788)
The requested Waiver to allow no streetlights on the interior streets of a proposed 17-lot
residential subdivision does not further the goals of the Citys Complete Street Standards or the
Walkability of the neighborhood. Staff does not support this Waiver request.
The requested Waiver to allow private streets to be developed to non-public street standards
behind a gate is not supported by staff. The goal of the Citys Complete Street Standard is not
advanced by permitting residential streets to be narrowed.
FINDINGS (TMP-64790)
The proposed Tentative Map conforms to Nevada Revised Statues. However, the project
requires two Waivers from Title 19 Development Standards. Staff does not support these
Waivers; as result, staff does not support the Tentative Map request and recommends denial.
The City Council approved Annexation (ANX-62934) for five acres located
03/16/16
on the southwest corner of North Grand Canyon Drive and Solar Avenue.
The effective date was 03/25/16.
07/12/16
12/28/15
YK


There are no related permits or business licenses on file at this time.
Staff met with the applicant and the owners of the property located on the
northwest corner of Grand Canyon Drive and Elkhorn Drive for a proposed
17-lot residential subdivision. During this meeting, the owners agreed to
05/18/16
design the project with no Variances or Waivers. However, if the new design
still required them, they would be included in the justification letter with the
application.
Start: 6:30
End: 7:40
Attendees: 1 Applicant, 2 CLV Staff, 34 Members of the Public

Residents present were not in favor of the proposed project. Several
mentioned that no more than 10 lots should be allowed on the site. Specific
points that were brought up more than once:
06/13/16
The project is too dense for the area;

The project isnt a good transition from the R-1 (Single Family
Residential) on the east to the R-E (Residence Estates) on the west;
Keep the area as rural as possible;
Concerned that a Home Building isnt part of the project;
The proposed lots are not large enough for the area;
The applicant may agree to a condition to limit development to singlestory, but would check with owner;
Many wondered why the owner wasnt present at the meeting.
The applicant indicated that they may hold another meeting if the
proposed project changes.
The two most important concerns that were raised:
What does the grading plan look like? Residents dont want the
foundations of the homes to be higher than 18-inches from the
centerline of the street; and
The density proposed is too high and is not compatible with the rural
County Island.
YK

Field Check
06/02/16
Staff visited the site and found an undeveloped parcel. No issues were noted
at the time.

Site Area
Net Acres
5.00
Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12
Subject Property
Undeveloped
North
Single Family,
Detached
South
Undeveloped
East
West
Single Family,
Detached
Single Family,
Detached
Undeveloped
Planned or Special
RNP (Rural
Neighborhood
Preservation)
RNP (Rural
Neighborhood
Preservation) Clark
County
RNP (Rural
Neighborhood
Preservation)
R (Rural Density
Residential)
RNP (Rural
Neighborhood
Preservation) Clark
County

R-E (Rural Estate
Residential District) Clark
County
R-1 (Single Family
Residential)
R-1 (Single Family
Residential)
R-E (Rural Estate
Residential District) Clark
County
Master Plan Areas

Trails
Compliance
N/A
Compliance
N/A
Compliance
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
YK

Pursuant to Title 19.02 and 19.06.070, the following standards apply:
Standard
Required/Allowed
Provided
Min. Lot Size
6,500 SF
6,510 SF
Min. Lot Width
60 Feet
60 Feet
Min. Setbacks
Front
20 Feet
20 Feet
Side
5 Feet
5 Feet
Corner
15 Feet
15 Feet
Rear
15 Feet
20 Feet
Max. Lot Coverage
50 %
50 %
35 Feet
35 Feet
Mech. Equipment
Screened
Screened
General Plan
RNP (Rural Neighborhood
Preservation)
Proposed General Plan
R (Rural Density Residential)
Existing Zoning
Proposed Zoning
R-1 (Single Family
Residential)
Compliance
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Permitted Density
Units Allowed
2.00
10
Permitted Density
3.59
Permitted Density
2.00
Permitted Density
Units Allowed
17
Units Allowed
10
Units Allowed
3.59
17
Street Name
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Grand Canyon Drive
Primary Arterial
Elkhorn Road
Primary Arterial
Solar Avenue
Minor Collector
Governing Document
Planned Streets and
Highways Map
Planned Streets and
Highways Map
Planned Streets and
Highways Map
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Compliance
with Street
Section
100
100
60
YK

19.04.040 Connectivity
Transportation Network Element
Internal Street
Intersection Internal
Cul-de-sac Terminus
Intersection External Street or Stub Terminus
Intersection Stub Terminus w/ Temporary Turn Around
Easements
Non-Vehicular Path - Unrestricted
Total
Required
Connectivity Ratio (Links / Nodes):
1.30
Streetscape Standards
Required
Elkhorn Road
Three-foot amenity area

and a five-foot wide
sidewalk.
Grand Canyon Drive
Three-foot amenity area

sidewalk.
# Links
3
# Nodes
1
2
1
4
3
Provided
1.33
Provided
Five-foot amenity area,
five-foot wide sidewalk and
a five-foot wide landscaped
area
Five-foot amenity area,
five-foot wide sidewalk and
a five-foot wide landscaped
area
Compliance
Y*
Y**
Five-foot amenity area

Five-foot amenity wide
Y**
sidewalk.
sidewalk.
*PW has agreed to a deviation of the standards in order to match the existing conditions to the
east of the project.
**PW has agreed to a deviation of the standards in order to match the existing conditions to the
east of the project.
***PW has agreed to a deviation of the standards in order to transition to the Clark County rightof-way to the west of the project.
Solar Avenue Minor
Collector
Parking Requirement
Required
Provided
Compliance
Gross Floor
Parking
Parking
Area or
Use
Parking
HandiHandiNumber of
Ratio
Regular
Regular
capped
capped
Units
Single Family,
17
2 per lot
34
Detached
34
34
Y
34
0
34
0
Y
YK
A 7 7 A b A 7
GPA-64786
b 7 7 7
A 777777
77 7 7 *77
77A *77
77 7 7 *
77777* 777 777 777b 7b 7

7b 77777777777 7
7 7777 7777777
77777 777
7 7
77777 777b 7b 77 7b 7 7
7777777777 7 77b 7 7
77A 777A 7 7 77777 777
777777
b 7

A
77 7
7 *
77 77
7 A
7 7 77
7777b 7
777
7A 7 77
A 7 * 7 7
7 7b 77 *7
A 7 77
77
77 7
A
7 777 7777
b 7 7 77
7A 7
77
7A 7 7
77
A 7 7A
7 7 *777
A 77 *7 7
b 77
77 7
77
7 7
b 7 7 7
7A 7
A b A 7 A 7A 7b 7
b 77
7777
A 77 *7
7 7
b 7
7A 7
A 7 A b 7 b 7b
b 7 7 *
A 77b 7b 7
7777 77
b 7
7A 7 7
77 777 777777 7
7 77 77*777777777
7 7 7
7
7 7 7 *77
777 777
7 A 7 7
7777 7
77 77
7 77777b 7
GPA-64786
7 A
7 7 77
7
7A 77
77 77777 7
7777 77
77 777
777
A 77 *A 7
77A 7 A 7A
7 b 7b
7b
7b
77 7A
7
77 7b 7A
77 A77
7A
77A
777

A77 777A
777
77
b
b
b777b
77
7
7

77
77
7
77

77
77
b77
b
7b
b
77
b777b
7777
77 77
b777b

774
4
7

57775
5
5
777
777
5bb 5
5bb775
b47b
b4 b
77 A 7 A 7
77 7 A
77 7
77b 7 A 7b
77 A 7b 7
A 7
77 7
77 A 7A
77A 7A 7
777
7 7 A 7
77 7b 7
7 7
77 A
7A7bA7
77 7A 7b
77 A 7A
77 b A 7b
77 A7A
7 A
777
b777b
b b
b777b
b

b7777b
b

7
7777 7
7 77777777 7b
7 77 777 7
777 77777
7 7
77 7 7
b77
7777
GPA-64786, ZON-64787, WVR-64788, WVR-64789 and TMP-64790
A7b
bA77A7b
7 7 7
7 7 7 7
7 7 7
Ab7 bA
GPA-64786 [PRJ-64704] - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT RELATED TO ZON-64787, WVR-64788, WVR64789 AND TMP-64790 - APPLICANT/ OWNER: KULKA LAND, LLC
NORTHWEST CORNER OF ELKHORN ROAD AND GRAND CANYON DRIVE
06/02/16
06/02/16
06/02/16
06/02/16
77
b777
7
777
777
7b77b77
A7
7777b
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 87 7 b7 7 7
777777777777A77b7b
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7 7 7 7 b7 7 7 87 7 7 7 b7 7 7 7 7
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 b7 7 7 7
7777777777
77A7A7
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
777
7b7b7
7777777777777777777
777777777777777
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
777777777777777
777777
777777
777b7777777
777b77b777777
777777777777777
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 b7 7 7 87 7 7 7 7
77777777777777b77777
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7777777
777
777777777777777
7 7 7 7 b7 7 7 7 7 b7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7

7777777777777777

7777777777777777777
7
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7
8
8

77777777777777787777

7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7
7
7
777

7777777777
7777
777
7777777777777
77777
7
7b77
877
b77
7
7
7
77
7
7
77877
877
777877
777
7877
77
77
77b7
77b7
7A7
777
7777
777787
777
77
b77
777
7777777b7787777777
7787777777777
77
A7777777777777777
7777777777777777777
777777777778777777777
77777777777778777
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 87 7 7
7777
77
A7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7777777777777777
777J7777777777777
7777777877777777777
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 87 7 7 7 7 7 7
7777777777
7777
777
7777777777A
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7777777777
77777777
87
7L87
7777777777
7777
Nora Lares
Subiect:
FW:
PA-647 86, ZON - 647 87, WV R- 647 89
RECEIV
---Original Message----
JUt f tr 206
From: Michelle Imailto:mddishon2872@email.com]

Sent: Thursday, July 07,2Ot611:01 PM
To: sam @cherrylv.com
Cc: Nicole Eddowes
Su bject: G PA-64786, ZON-647 87, WVR-64789
tty of t-ae Veoes
Dept. of plann-ing
Hello Commissioner Cherry,

I am
wrting to express my concern regarding a rezoning request of 5 acres next to my home.
Kulka Land, LLC is asking for L7 homes on a 5 acre parcel where 8 homes is what it is currently zoned for. lt's also in the
RNP which we continually try to fight to preserve here in Las Vegas.
We have asked the developer to work with us and ask for something with less density that we both can agree on.
We hope you will look at the negative impact this could have in our area and deny this application.
Thank you,
Michelle Dishon
Submitted atter f inal agenda

1
D^r$7ftildn
-5L?
t[L/lI/2016/Itrf0N 04:51
FA
Plr,f
P 001/001
No
ity of Las Vegas
PRSRT
FIHSTCLASS MAIL
U.S, Poslaoe
Deprtment of Planning
Development $ervic enter
333 Noith Rancho Drive, 3d Floor
Las Vegas, Nevada E9106
PAID'
Las Veg, NV
Permil No. 1 630
REEIVD

Offrcal Notice of PuhlicHearing
JUL
11 2016
tlty of Las Vegas

Dept. of Pl anning
If
you wish to file yotu profst or
suPPort
on this reguestr check
the
aPpropn ate box below and return this card in an envelope with P0steg to the
Department of Planning at the addresg listed bove, fax thie side of this card to
Repsentative,
QAZ) 464-7+99. If you would like to
please cell
('1
02) 229 -f05.
1251S12024
I SUPPORT
thi$ Requst
this Request
Please use available blank space
for your comments.
Gase: GF444786
I(ALTNACH RONAL L
MARTIN SHARONA
7075 N JENSEN 5T
LASVEGAS NV 8914S1359
GPA.64786 & ZON-64787 IPRI

Planning Commission Meeting of 7lLN20l6
irilsr;f.{fnl, ffiS:
i'5s
f''l"l'l'l'l'fll'tltl"ltttl'l'llfrfrf rfl'lff l'lllff"t'llll'
5l-52?
Jul 07 1 6 09:1
p.3
860440-3s34
Langhammer Larv Office
City cti Las Vegrs
PFSRI
trFsT cl.Ass [.rArr
epartrnent of Plunnin-s
i)cr clopment Scn'ixs Centcr
.133 Norrh Rancho t)riue, 3'd Floor
-r$ vegts, Nevd 8910
U.S.
Posta
PAI
D
Ls Vegs.
l.ll
Pmil li. 1630
Refurn Sen'ice Requested

Official Nofice of Public
Hall
It' y.'ou rvish trr tle .vour prort or supfrort on rhi.s requsr. check the
rppropriate bo.r below and rcturn this curd irr an cnvelope rvith postage ro rhe
Llepertment of Planning t :hc ddress liscd rhrve, lx this sidc of this card to
(702) 464-7499. If you worltl like to conl3ct your Council Represeutative,
pltxse call (?0?) 229-6.10-5
I SUPPORT
rhis Rcquest
Please usc availablc blank spacc
GP.{-64786 & Z0N-647s7 [
Cse:6PA-64786
1251951 1032
LANGHAMMER LLOYO
85 NIANTIC RVER RD
WATERFORD CT 06385-2537
I OPPOSE
this Rcqucst
rd for your comntenrs.
-64704)
Planrring Conrnrission rlecring of 7 l12l?016
rirli.iF; I
'
i;.-..
::_ r:.'
__
| w l : 41il : l, 4 t U ll,' l r t l, ll t fi l l
t
lt,,
r n
l, l,
il l l,
Niatic River Road

Wateford, CT 06385
85
July
via facsimile
Ciry
ollas
?,2016
17021 464-?499
Vegas
RCI\IED
Department olPlanning
Development Services Celrter
3331forth Rancho Drive,3'd Floor
JLtt_ x
20t6
C'ty of Ls Vegas
epi. of Ptannng
Re:
wvR-64788 & WVR-64789

GPA-4786 &.ZON-64781
TlvfP-4790
Dear Department of
Planning:
Enclosed herervith please find the cards registering my opposition. More specificaly. the
request for re-zoning is contrary to the Comprehensive Plan of Development already adopled by
sole
tt e Cify of Las Vegas. There exists no reason to re-zone for the developer's benefitt' The
basis ior the zoning request is tbr the developer's beneft and lrot r the citizens ofthe cily of
Las Vegas. Acco.ingly, I would request that the Departme nt of Plarming anUor lhe responsible
officials deny this request.

Respecttrlly,
d*"1
Lloyd L. Langammer (A
Enclosures (3)
5l'5L?
7L 4q-74q,
Citi of Lao Vcqis

Depsrtrnenl of Pl anning
PRSBl
HnsTc-ss l,lll
Developmcnt Servics Ceritr

331 Nonh Rancho Drivc.3d Floor
Las Vegas, Ncvada d9106
U.S. Poslao
PAID.
Las Vegar, NV
RECIVEE
Return Servic Requested

Officlal Notice of Public Hearng
JUL
Peftdt N. 1630
11 2016
City of Las Veoas

Dept. of ptanring
61
City Hall
If you wish lo file your protedf or support on this rcquest, c,hect< the
tPtropriate box b+lor+ snd rtrm tlus cd in on envelope *i postg to the

Dpfifrncnl qf Plenning at g address listed above, fax ttris sidc of thie card m
(7Q2) 46+-7499. If you rvould like fo contsct your Couucil Rpresentative,
pleare call
Q V) 229
1z'Ig1lro1o
-6405.
Jit"$*h* .M*r*,
GPL-64786 & 2ON.64787 [PRI-64704]

Pranning commission
csge: GPA'84786
ABRA.TIAM'S SEOTRUST
P o BOX 75009s
LAS VEGS NV 89136
you r
"!-"tl/#l,t$,=
onr'en,s
i r
{,
,,''llf', ll'iu,l il'll, t,l tl t\l il' {t,,

ill
illt
5l-5
City oILas Vegas
PHST
Dcpartment o1' Planning

Developrncnt Scrvices Cenr
Las Vcgas, Ncvada 891 06
FIHST CLASS MAIL

U.S. Poslage
PA ID
Las Vegas, NV
Permit No. 1030

RECEruEE
\ 6t!
City Hall
to
JUL tr 1
il
2016
lty of Las Veges

Dept. of Planning
Cly*ntl
{sln
lf you wish to lile your
proLest or suppot on this rcquest, cheqk the

appropriate box belorv and return lhis eard in al envelope with postagc to the
Departnrent of Plannin-r at the addrcss listed above, fax this side of ths card to
t'|(n> 4g-1499. lf you would like to conlact your Council Represenlative,
please call (l A2) 229-6+05.
i,,'i:iJl
12s19110012
case: GPA-64786
KAEV JAN ANDERS & }NGRID ELIZAEE

9790 ADDIE MEADOW CT
LAS VEGAS NV 89149
il,','*,
Please use a vailable bank space on card for your comments.
Gpa-64786 & zON-64787 [PRJ-647041

Planning Comnrission Meeting of 7/lAZAl6
j ;; '
Lli+u ,,".*
,',
g l! j. +i .{i
Jlt,,ll lff f ,lf ,f,'
lJ
l,'flftlll,lf,'
ft, ilf
l,,lllll'
5l-sL?
'd
7,698-86-LB
$apuv
dgO:O
9t 90 tnl
Jul-06-2016 04:10
PM The
Hutchens Family
1022430296
FAGE. 7/
City of Lrs Vcgas
PHSHT
Deprtnent of Planning
Developntcnt Service eilIsr
l33 North Rnncho Drive, .ld Floor
Las Vcgas, Nevads tJg 106
FIRST CLASS MAIL
U.S, Postage
PAID
Las Vegas, NV
Permit No, 1030

OffTciul Notice of Puhltc Ilearing
ITIVED
JUL
lllt*fl
tr
2O16
'ity of Las Vegas

ept. of Planning
ity lfull
Il' you wioh to file your protst or suppotl on ths requ$t, check
the
rppropriat box below nd leturn thig crrd i0 it envelope with postrge t0 the
Deprlrnent of Planrtng $t the rrddr$$ listed above, fhx this sirle of this carrl to
("12) 464-7499. If you would ltkc to conracr ycnrr Council Repru.scntative,
please cal I ('7 02l. 229-fi415,
I SUFPORT
I OPPOSE
tlls Re.q{'st
thls Rr:quost
1AS1BBl1016
aee: GPA-64788
HUCHENS TERRY J & CATHERIN M

7332 RUST1O ORE5T ST
TAS VEGAS NV 89149
Plese use vailble blank space on crd for your comnnnts.
GPA-64786
2ON"64787 [pRJ-64704]
Planning Cornrnissiorr Meeting of 7,'12016
I ;r'i"
i-trJi:ir.iiix
J.
*i,fi
T.
;.+i
rlt'll,lltllllrtl't'll'ltlllli ,l"lllillillll*ylttl
5l-5L?
E7/ E6/
?E1r
EF:
3l"Pl 7E?4t8573
PAE 81/81
RE]D SIITH
City of Las Vcgas

DE+rartrnent ol Pl*trning
PRSRT
FIRST CLASS M
u.S. Postage
PAI
Las
N
bJ
This i$ the last 5 ar Frcel in the re to be developed. Why, after everyone ele has purchased
and/or
built homes in good faith ln cordnce with"RNP onlng. At the June meeting there was no ju$tification
presented that would warrant re-ronirrg. Thi is a
beginwlth.
Pleaserejecttheproost.
nfrecamn olfthy wg have
;;H:
If
you wish to file yortr proiest or slrpprt r)fi this rqrst, chc( tb
appropn*te box below and rtlurn this eard in irn etrvelox with postage to tl
Depfftrnilt of Pl*nning at rhe addre,ss lstcd sbove, ftx this side of tfus card to
(1t2) 464.-1499. If y-ou would. .ke to. cona.ct your Counoil Reprsentative,
please call (1 W) 229 - 6405.
OPFDSE
this Rcqncst
I.
GPA.6478
P.
e ZON-64?87
f.or your colIrtrlts
JUL tr 1
CTty
2O16
of t-as Vegas
Dept" of Planning
251 841
0005
c: GPA{4786
SMITH DANA L FAMILYTRU$T

SMITH REID 5 & DANA L CO.TRS
73OS SILENT WATER WAY
LA$VEGAS NV 89143
[PRr-64704]
lann in g fl omnr.s si or: Meeturg
REffEE
fM tffi- -ffi
fuoo,t-f,
I SI-IPPORT
this Requcst
zqning regulatlonf to
o.f. 7 I
12 120 L tt
#rrrr*rips.
#:
d,
ltf"lll'ltl,lr,,lf ,fl,,,ll,hl'J,ff ll"lllil,ulllltll'
5tSZ?
City of Las Vegas
PBSBT
De vel opment Sen'jces Center
33- Nr-:nh Rancho Drive,3'd Roor
Las Vg:as, )ilevada 89106
FIHSTCISS MAIL
U.S. Postaoe
PAID-
Las Vegas, NV
Permit No. 1630
Return Service Requesfed

RECTVED
JUL
tr
2016
trifiirH?,;
^
lil
niHrll
Lqls lp
r.953
Il you rvish to file
your protesi or support on this request, check thc
appropriate box below and retum this card in an envelope with posrage ro the
Dcpartrnent of Panning at thc address listed above, fax this side of rhis card to
(7OZ) 46+7499. If you would ljle ro contact your Council Represenrative,
ple:rse call (102) 229-6{.05.
cse GPA-486
1251gg1101g
BECKMAN LLLIAN D TRUST

7325 RUSTIC CREST ST
ty:,"":J 6[,?.'ff;:,,
Please use avajlable blank space on card for your con.men
Gp.-64786 & ZON-64787 [PRJ-64704]
Planning Commission leeting of 711212016
i ;T ?
i;:ii:,',i'1i:: l. .s l ,:.f;
l lh t, l t r l,
Il it l ilr lilt i ll
t,
t, l
il il\,
tll
{,
dZ:20 91 0 lnf
z'd
5l-57?
REEVE
.J
I
'.1
I
JLlr tr 1
20i6
Io
CIty of t-as Vegas

ept. of Planning
rl
</r'
/11--
City of Las Vegas

PRSRT
FIRST CLASS MAIL
Development Services Ccnter

333 North Rancho Drive,
U.S. Poslaoe
PAID-
Las Vegas, Nevada 891O6
"--

615
City Hall
6r - 6478[*ZtN 64787
yrtk
Ii
NV
30
you wish to file your protest or support on ths rqest, check
the
7"n
It
)
st-szr
City of Las Veg

Deparment of Plamlng
PRSRT
FIRSTLASST,IIL
U.S. Poshge
Developrnent Sesices Cent+r

333 Noth Rancho Drire.3d Floor
pAto
las Vegas,NeradaEPl
Las
\hps,
NV
Parmf No. 1630
Retum,Service Requested
Officil Itlotice of Public H*aring
RCEIVD
JUL
NL
tity of l-as Veoas
(it1 Hall
Dept. of plann'ng
If yor ush to file 3-or pftest r $upport ori ths rBq$t,
che*k lhe
approprale box below and netum this card in ar e*relofl,e wth postage to the
at the address lisd abole, fax this -ide of this cord to
46'L
wold likr.o contc your Cour*it Represenfave,
12s1s4oioo9
6as
GF+4786
IGLTY JA$ES R & DEMSE TFP

968.I SOTAEAV
LA^ VEGAS NV 9fl$1gt1
SUPrcRT
I OPPSE
thisRoes
this Request
card for you comments.

GP,{,-647S6 & UDt{-4?r/ [PRr-64?t4]
Planning commission M*fip"r###fff+r
Please use avallable
r.
,,:i..
,Jrltl*l,J,itJl,,ruJ'l'ftftff ,1il,,,,,,tllltt,1,r,,11fJ,
St'52?
Cily
ofL Veg
PSR
RRSIttTASSMA|L
Depammt of Plmning
Development SeoJces Center
3.13 ,;orth Ranrho Drive. Jd Floo
ljs Vegas. NevadaS9l06
U.S.lelaae
PA] D-
REEffD
Las V:o- NV
Pemt0. i o
Return Service Requesd

Oflcial Notice of Public Hearing
If you uish to tle yfrr protesl tr supF{xt on this request. check the
appopriate bor telow nd rctum lhs crd itr atr enrclope u.ith trlstage o the
Depaflmnt of Plamin8 address listed abole, f.lI this side of this crd lo
,-12) 464-7499- lf )'ou q'ould like to contac your Council Repsentlle,
ple call (7O2) 229-6tl05.
f SUPPORT
thir Request
2O16
City of Las Vecas

ept. of Ptanni-ing
JUL tr 1
12S.t
S'O2O20
DISI-ION TREVOR
Ca*: GPA{4786
JAHES & MICHELLE D
9690 WITTIG AVE

LAS VGAS M/ 8914S1392
.fl'r,r,":'-,
for your cormenls-
Plea-se use available blank space on card
GP-t78 & ZON-64?S7 tPR-47041

PlanningCommissionMetirrgofJ.*Z.r,tl.ri
Its
cl
*-,
!l
5l-52?
City of Las Vegas

l)epaflnent of Planning
PRSRT
FIRST CTASS MAIL
Developmcnt Set.vices Center

333 North Rancho Drive, 3d Floor
Las Vcgas. Ncvatja 89106
U.S. Postage
PA ID
Las Vegas, NV
Permit No, 1630

Ofcial Notice of Putrlic Hearing
RECIVED
JUL
11
2016
of Las VegasDePt. of Plannlng
Cfrty
lf
you wish to llc your protest ol suppo1 on this request, check the
appropriate box belorv antl cturn this card in an cnvclopc rvith po-stage to the
Depanment ol'Planning at the rddrcss listcd abovc, lax this side of'this card to
(702) 464-7499. lt' you would like {o conlact your Council Rcpresentiltive.
pleuse call (7 OZ) 229 -6405.
I
I
IISUPPoRT
I rhis Rcquest
T\-4
l^l
IoPPOSE
this Rcttrcst
,,',2a16
case: GPA-64786
HOOKE ROBERT D & DONNA J

9675 ELKHORN RD
t.AS VEGAS NV 89149-1911
Please use available blank space on card for your cornrents.
GpA-64786 & ZON-64787 [PRJ-64704]

Planning Commission Meeting of 7ll2l2J16
J.;
.jrri.{:.r: .J. ri1:r
tl''lll,fll'fll,"f'fl,{'fl,l,l,l'l,iu 'lll,,J,,llf ,llll
5l- 5z?
City ol Las Vcgas
PFSR
l)cpannrent ol Planning
Dcvclopment Services Center
Las Vegas. Ncvda 89106
FIRST CLASS MAIL
U.S. Postage
PA ID
Las Vegas, NV
Permil No. 1630

REEffD
JUL tr 1
2016
City of Las Vegas

DePt. of Planning
toqtt
ryth
Il' you wish to file your
prolcst or suppoll on this rcqucst. check the

approprilte box below and return this card in an envclope with posta-re to the
Dcpanment ol'Planning al the addrL'ss Ii.sted above. lax this side ol'this card to
(1OZ) 464-7499. ll you would like to contact your Council Reprscnttive.
plca
t'
se.,.Cjr
ll
{7 02) 229 - 64A 5.
Case: GPA-64786
251 84 1 0002
SCOTT CAMILLE & BRENDON
7369 SILENT WATER WAY
LAS VGAS NV 89149
1
f OPPOSE
I SUPPORT
this Request
Request
Please use available blank space on
your conrments.
cPA-64786 & ZON-64787 [PRJ-64

Plannirrg Conrnission Meeting of 7/1212016
r;i1r.it=i f 'l!
ilf
lll,t, t|i;r,1, l,t lt,,
r,,
il r,,l
tlillltl, iliu,l,,l,lr,, t, lh
5l-52?
City ol'Las Vegas

l)cpanmcnt of Planning
l)cvclopment Services Ccntcr
333 Norrh Rancho f)rive.3'd Floor
PRSHT
FIRSTCI.ASS MAIL
U.S. Postaoe
PAIDLas Vegas, NV
.l630
Permit No.
0fficial Notice of Public Hearing
RCEIVED
JUL
2016
City of Las Vegas

Dept. of Planning
o6tt
^H
gty Hdl
t@lmHp
stffi!
lf you wish to lle
your protest or suppo on lhis rcquesl, check
the
appropriate box below an<l rctum this card in an cnvclopc with postage to thc
Depatmcnt of Planning irt the address listcd above, l'ax this side of this c:rd to
{1OZ) 464-1499. lf you would like to conlact your Council ReprescntaLive.
please cal I (7 02) 229 -6405 -
-I
I
suPPoRr fVl-
lthisRcqucst I
r25184o1org
case: GPA-M786
GRAVES WILLIAM R & MICHELLE C

7365 N JENSEN ST
LASVEGAS NV 89149.1916
roPPosE
lthisRequest
Please use available blank space on card for your corrments.
cpA-6478 & ZON-64787 [PRJ-64704]

Planning Commission Meeting ol 7l 1212016
J::i
Lri?i':,i"iir
li "{. i,
lll
I ll
i' ll lr
" ililtlln " \tl ' " ll'l'
tf
f'f
"'
l'
'
5l-SLP
City ol'Las Vegas

Depanmcnt of Plunning
Dcvelopmenl Scrvices Center
333 Nonh Rancho Drive, 3'd Floor

Ofcial Notice of Public Hearing
PRSRT
FIRSTCLASS MAIL
U.S Postage
PA ID
Las Vegas, NV
Permit No. 1630
RECIVED
JUL
6tt
11
2016
City of Las Vegas

Dept. of Planning
ll' you wish to lilc your prolest er suppo on this reqrrest, check the
appropriate box bclow and return this card in an envelope with postage to the
Depanment of Planning at the address listed above. fax this side ofthis card to
(702) 4@-7499. If you rvould like to <:ontact your Council Reprcscntative,
plcase call (7 02\ 229 -6405.
I SUPPORT
ths Rcquest
case: GPA-786
12sr841ooo3
ZACI.I,ARY FAMILY TRUST

ZACIjARY KEETON DALE & JULIE TRS
LASVEGAS NV 89149
X,*,'tt'*l
Please use available blank Space on crd lor your corments.
GpA-6478 & ZON-64787 [PRJ-64704]

Planning commission t-l::p+"t,1.rtlSr9r,-
r.
..c
{s
il|,
illt I,t rul il, rf l,,ll, I l,,r tl,,
th
ll,
I,t l,
ll, llf
,r
ill r rh
5l-5zP
City of Las Vcgas

l)epanrnent of Planning
PRSRT
FIRST CLASS MAIL
l)c.velopment Scrvices Centcr

rii. xorr Rancho Drive. J' Floor
t-ur'.t1,.gut. Ncvadr 89 I 06
U.S. Posage
.PAID
Las Vegas, NV
- --"',1o. ,l630
This is the last 5 acre parcel in the area to be developed. Why, after everyone else has purchased
and/or
built homes in good failh in accordance wth'RNP zonng. At the June rneeting there was no justification
presented that would warrant re-oning. rhis is

begin with. Please reject the proposal.
a'WWH n".'"'''u;;';;;r;
fur,--" t;H
JULrl2o16
11 you -wish to lle your prolest or support on this request. check the
**appropriltc.box]t]clow:ind:rc(rn tlis card:in:un.entek>pc with postagc to tle
l)eprtmcn( of'Planning at thc address listcd above, lix this side of ihis card tli "(7OZ) 464-'1499. tl you would-like.to corrlct your Council Reprcscntative,
please call (7 02) 229 -645.
I SUPPORT
!OPPOSE
this Request
this Regucst
on
for your comments.
_CIit!
of Las Vegas
Dept. rrfPlnning
1251g41ooos
case: GPA-6478
SMITH DANA L FAMILY TRUST

SMITH REID S & DANA L CO.TRS
LAS VEGAS NV 89149
cp{-64786 & ZON-64787 [pRJ-4704]

Planning Con.mission Meeting o 711217016
;rL:,5iTTi r
ri.
llll,'hlll'lll,l,,'lf
'f|,,,ll'1,1,'f,ff
ff',flrllylltllll'
t-tz?
lity of Las Vcgas
PRSRT
)epurtmct of Planning
)evclopment Serliccs Ccntcr
33 Nonh Runcho l)rive, 3d Floor
.as Vcgas. Nevda 8910
F|FSTCTSS ilAlL
U.S. Postage
PAI D
Las Vagas, NV
PermilNo. 1630

Offcial Notice of Publlc Hearing
RECEII'D
-J.
E6tt
JUL
Ciry Hall
îl
tltsFl
r.9
you wish ro lilc your protcst or support on this rcques, check
suPPoRr fA
rhis
Request lA
2016
the
rppropriatc hox below and rcturn this card in an envclopc u'ith grcstage to thc
)cptrment of Pl:rnning at the address listed above. tax this sitle ol'this curd to
702t. 4&-1499. lf you would likc to contat your Council Rcpresentative,
lcase call (7 02) 229 -6405.
l-1
"',6
flr,::iti:?ff
cllytldl
to
.L
-J.-'
1zsila1zo27
case: GPA4789
roPPosE
WESTIOFF JAMES J & KORINNE S

7220 FERN MEADOW ST
this Request
LASVEGASNV 89149
)lease use available blank space on card for your comments.
3PA-786 & 2ON.64787 [PRJ-64704]

?lanning Commission Meeting of
7ll7n0l6
Application Location
Application Informtion
GPA.64786 . GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT . PUBLIC
HEARING . APPLICANT/ OWNER: KULKA LAND' LLC. FOT
possible action on a request for a General Plan Anrendment FROM:
RNP (RURAL NEIGHBORHOOD PRESERVATION) TO: R
(RURAL DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) on 5.0 acres at the nofthwest
corner of Elkhorn Road and Grand Canyon Drive (APN 125- l8-403O03);'Ward-6 (Ross) [PRJ-64704].
2ON.64787. RBZONING RELATED TO GP4.64786 . PUBLIC

HEARING - APPLICANT/ OWNER: KULKA LAND' LLC - For
possible action on a request for a Rezoning FROM: R-E
(RESIDENCE ESTATES) TO: R.I (SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL) on 5.0 acres at the northwest corner of Elkhorn
Road and Grand Canyon Drive (APN 125-18-403-003), Ward 6
(Ross) [PRJ-64704].
,/l/a-'g
)r//r'd-
Thc proposed project may not pertain to the cntire highlightcd

project site.
Public Hearing Information

I\feeting:
-Date:
Planning Commission
July 12,2016
:00 P.M.
City Council Chambers

495 South Main Steet,
[s
2nd
Floor
Nevada 89101
5I-SL?
City of Las Vcgas
PRSRT
f)epartmcnt of Planning
Developmcnt Scrvices Cetcr
313 North Rncho Drive. 3'd lloor
Las Vegas. Ncvada 89 I 0
FIRST CLASS MAIL
U,S. Postage
PA D
Las Vegas, NV
Permil No. 1630
RECEryED

JUL T 1 Zt)lli
trr;:m","rr"ru"
p6
Xall
^tl
City lll
Lm
lf you
ip
wish to lle your protest or support on this rcqucst. chcck
the
appropriate box bclow nd return this card in an envelopc with posta-ee to the
Departmcnt of Planning t the address listed above. fax this side of this canl to
(702) 464-7499. ll you wotilci like to contact your Council Representativc,
please call (l 02) 229 -6405.
I SUPPORT
this Request
1251g410006
case: GPA-647g6
IOPPOSE
MINOSKI RICKY J & MARY

this Request
rAsVGASNV 89149-1701
Please use available blank space on card for your commenls.
GpA-64786 & ZON-64787 [PRJ-64704]

Planning Commission Meeting of 1l'l2l2A
]::.
ilt:ti.::;;;''' J rfi i,i'i$
1,,tt,,, lt lrf
,,htllll, lllttllril fi ,l,l1ll, " "1" lll,'t, lll,l
5V2?
City of Las Vegas
PRSRT
FIRST CI.ASS I'/IAIL
U.S. Postage
l)epaf menl of Planning

Developmcnt Scrvices Center
333 North Rancho Drivc.3'd Floor
PA ID
Las Vegas, NV
Permit No, 1630

RECETVED
p6rJ
JUL tr.1
City
llall
2016
Citv of Las Vegas

Oe'Pt. ot Planning
sth9
f you wish to frle your protest or
suppon on this reques!. check the
appropriate box below and retum this card in an envelope with postage to the
Departnrent of Planning at the address listed above, fax this side olthis card to
(702\ 464-'1499.
plcasc call
(1
lf
you would like to contact your Council Representalivc.
RAO GOPAL
LEE SUSIE
7111 NARROWPEAKST
02) 229 -6405.
I SUPPORT
this Request
case: GPA-il786
i2s19s11022
t-As VEGAS NV 89149-0160
I OPPOSE
this Request
Please use available blank space on card for your comnents.
GpA-64786 & ZON-64787 [PRJ-64704]

Pranning commission tt1.g+"3lrti?s,io'
j. i ,...i:j
tll,llillt,,,tlf,f
,,tf rJ,r,ntftftlf
tf
ltlln,l'f rtltllllllt
5l-5L7

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
ZON-64787 - REZONING RELATED TO GPA-64786 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/
OWNER: KULKA LAND, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Rezoning FROM: R-E
(RESIDENCE ESTATES) TO: R-1 (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) on 5.0 acres at the
northwest corner of Elkhorn Road and Grand Canyon Drive (APN 125-18-403-003), Ward 6
(Ross) [PRJ-64704]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
C.C.: 9/21/2016
27
RECOMMENDATION:
2. Location and Aerial Maps - ZON-64787, WVR-64788, WVR-64789 and TMP-64790 [PRJ64704]

paper use, backup
A 7 7 A b A 7
ZON-64787
b 7 7 7
A 777777
77 7 7 *77
77A *77
77 7 7 *
77777* 777 777 777b 7b 7

7b 77777777777 7
7 7777 7777777
77777 777
7 7
77777 777b 7b 77 7b 7 7
7777777777 7 77b 7 7
77A 777A 7 7 77777 777
777777
b 7

A
77 7
7 *
77 77
7 A
7 7 77
7777b 7
777
7A 7 77
A 7 * 7 7
7 7b 77 *7
A 7 77
77
77 7
A
7 777 7777
b 7 7 77
7A 7
77
7A 7 7
77
A 7 7A
7 7 *777
A 77 *7 7
b 77
77 7
77
7 7
b 7 7 7
7A 7
A b A 7 A 7A 7b 7
b 77
7777
A 77 *7
7 7
b 7
7A 7
A 7 A b 7 b 7b
b 7 7 *
A 77b 7b 7
7777 77
b 7
7A 7 7
77 777 777777 7
7 77 77*777777777
7 7 7
7
7 7 7 *77
777 777
7 A 7 7
7777 7
77 77
7 77777b 7
ZON-64787
7 A
7 7 77
7
7A 77
77 77777 7
7777 77
77 777
777
A 77 *A 7
77A 7 A 7A
7 b 7b
7b
77 7A
7
77 7b 7A
7A
77A7

77
7
77

7

b77b
b
b

A777A
77 7

77
7

77

77 7
77 7

777
b77b
b b
b77
b 7b
b
b 777b
b
b 77
7b
b
77
7b
b 77

b
77
7

b 7
b77

5
5
b
b 77

7b
b
77 >

77
7
777 7>

b77 >
b
77A
77
7
77 7
7 75
77 7
75
77 A 7 A 7
77 7 A
77 7
77b 7 A 7b
77 A 7b 7
A 7
77 7
77 A 7A
77 A77
777
7 7 A 7
77A 7A 7
7 7
7b
77 7b 7
77 7A 7b
77 A 7A
77 b A 7b
77 A
7A7bA7
77 A7A
7 A
777
7
7777 7
7 77777777 7b
7 77 777 7
777 77777
7 7
77 7 7
b7
7777

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
WVR-64788 - WAIVER RELATED TO GPA-64786 AND ZON-64787 - PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT/ OWNER: KULKA LAND, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Waiver
TO ALLOW NO STREETLIGHTS WHERE SUCH ARE REQUIRED on 5.0 acres at the
northwest corner of Elkhorn Road and Grand Canyon Drive (APN 125-18-403-003), R-E
(Residence Estates) Zone [PROPOSED: R-1 (Single Family Residential)], Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ64704]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
C.C.: 8/17/2016
23
RECOMMENDATION:
3. Protest/Support Postcards for WVR-64788 and WVR-64789 [PRJ-64704]

paper use, backup
A 7 7 A b A 7
WVR-64788
b 7 7 7
A 777777
77 7 7 *77
77A *77
77 7 7 *
77777* 777 777 777b 7b 7

7b 77777777777 7
7 7777 7777777
77777 777
7 7
77777 777b 7b 77 7b 7 7
7777777777 7 77b 7 7
77A 777A 7 7 77777 777
777777
b 7

A
77 7
7 *
77 77
7 A
7 7 77
7777b 7
777
7A 7 77
A 7 * 7 7
7 7b 77 *7
A 7 77
77
77 7
A
7 777 7777
b 7 7 77
7A 7
77
7A 7 7
77
A 7 7A
7 7 *777
A 77 *7 7
b 77
77 7
77
7 7
b 7 7 7
7A 7
A b A 7 A 7A 7b 7
b 77
7777
A 77 *7
7 7
b 7
7A 7
A 7 A b 7 b 7b
b 7 7 *
A 77b 7b 7
7777 77
b 7
7A 7 7
77 777 777777 7
7 77 77*777777777
7 7 7
7
7 7 7 *77
777 777
7 A 7 7
7777 7
77 77
7 77777b 7
WVR-64788
7 A
7 7 77
7
7A 77
77 77777 7
7777 77
77 777
777
A 77 *A 7
JItL/11/2016/M0N 04: 48
F,{
Plrlf
P 001/001
No,
Cty of Las Vegas
PRSRT
evelopment Services Center
333 Nonh Rancho Drive,3rd Floor
Les Veg, Nevada 89106
FIRSTCIAS$ MAIL
[J.S, Postaoe
PAIDL Vegas, NV
Permit No, 1630
Return Senlce Requested

Official Notice of Public llearing
RECIEIVD
JUL
City of Las Vegas

Dept" of Planning
l0rlt
If
I 1 2016
you wish to file your protest or support ort this request, check
the
appropriate box below and rhrrn this cand in an envelope with postage to the
Department of Planning tt th ddress listed above, fax this side of ths card to
Representative,
QA 464-7499. If You would like to
please call (7OZ) 7Zg 4+05.
1251S10024
I SUPPORT
this Request
ttris Requegt
Please use available blank space
cess:wvFs4788
KALTENACH RONALD L
MARTIN SHARON A
7075 N JENSEN ST
LAS VEGAS NV SS14$1359
for your commsnts.
wvR-64788 & WVR-64789 [pRI-64704]

Planning Commission Meeting of 7/12,1216
ii:r.rr
6ts{..[#
frlll'lllflf
fff
lttl'rff fg'f'lhrltlh'tlllll'ftf
Submittod after ftnal ageruia
*TfrrlttruZ'sLl?
Ju1071609:11a
!--ity"
p.2
860440-3534
LanghammerLawOffice
of Lrs Vegirs
PFSBT
Dep:rrtmcnt of Planning
L)cvel lpnrent Serviccs Csn ler
j.'lj Norrh Rcncho Dlive. 3'r Floor
Lrs \'gus. Nevada lJ9 I 0
FIRST OLASS ['tli

U,5. Posaoe
PAID-
Las Vegas, NV
Permir.No. 1330
Return Service Requcsted

Official Nolice of Public Hearing
ChyHall
A
il
CwHdl
tx'.v+
ll'you wish ro lilc.r-ouc
prolesr r suppt on this rquesr, chcck rhe

nshrrv :lnd rcruro this crd in an envr.lope wifh postag to tht:
l)epanrnent ol'Planning t the rddrers listed ctove- fax chissiele of dts car.J lo
apprtrpriate
bol
(73 +6+-7a9r. lf you rvould like ro conract vour Council Represerrrative,

plerse call (7 OZ) 229-05.
r2s1g511032
LANGHAlvilvlR LLOYD
I OPPOSE
I.SUPPORT
this Rcqucst
on
-+
85 NIANTIC IVER RO -.
WATERFOFD CT 06385.2537
this Request
Plcase usc available blank
case: !vvn{;4768
for your comments.
rvvR.64788 & tvVR-64789 [pRJ-64704]

Planning Commission Meeting cf 7/12/2A16
frr,.+j:
r: fr,;:ii;j
/,flfJfJltt,
,,,t[1,,!,llil,tlt,lllllilt,rlll,lll,tt
85 Niantic
fuver Road
Wateford, CT 06385
July 7, 2016
., .,
r,ia facsinile 1702) 464-7499

Cir'* of Las Vegas
RECIVE
Depaftment olPtanning
333-l.torth Rancho Drive, 3'd Floo
Las Vegas, Nevada 89 1 0
Re:
JL|L
fI
2o16
tity
of Las Vegas
ept. f Planning
v/vR-64788 & WVR-64789

GPA-64786 eZON-64787
Tlv{P-64790
Dear Department of Planning:

the
Enclosed herervilh please find the cards registering my opposition. More specifrcaliyb.uadopted
already
Development
of
Plan
the
Comprehensive
is
to
conlrary
requesl for re-zoning
sole
te cit:, of Las vegas. There exists no reason to re-zone lor the developer's bencFrt. The
Cify Df
basis lor the zoning request is tbr the developer's benefil and rlot f'or the cilizens olth
Las Vegas. ecco.dingiy, I would request that the Department of Planning anrVor the responsible
ResPec.tfrllY,
do"{
Lloyd L. Lan$tammer
Enclosures (3)
53-9?
City of Las Vegas
PRSRT
Departnrent of Plarrning
Devetopnrent Senices Cenrcr
333 North Raneho Drive. 3'd F'lcor
FIBSTCLASS MAL
U,S. Postage
PAD
Las Vegas, NV
Permil No, 1630

Official Notice of Public Ilearing
REGEIVD
JUt
&6"9
tr
2016
eitv of Las Vegas

oet. or Planning
If you wish to fle your
protest
or supPott on this
reguest, chcck the
ppropriate box belorv and retum this card in an envelope with postage to the
Department of Planning at the address listcd above, fax this side of this card to
CIOZ) 464-'1499. If you woukl like to contct your Council Representative,
please call (7 02) 229 -6405.
l-1
I
sLrPPoRr Vl
Request
r
this
1251 91
I oPPosE
Ol 2
Case: WVR-64788
KAEV JAN ANDERS & INGRI ELIZABE

LAS VEGAS NV 89149
this Request
Please use available blank space on card for your con:ments.
\ryvR-64788 & \WR-64789 [PRJ-6 4704]

Planning Commisson Meeting of 7112/2016
I .i; :iq#{i'iF J S i':i'r
tlnn, t,,,illlllJ
lruilr ff
llt' r, ll I l'lr llf , f ,r It lrll,lf
rr,f
ll
53-5t{P
'd
Z69B.BV6.LB
slopuv
1LO:ZO 9 L q0
lnf
Ju}.06.2016 04:11 PM The Hutchens Family
PAGE. 3/
7022430296
City of Lus Vegrs
PRSBT
FIRSTCI.ASS MAIL
U.S. Postage
lJepannrent of Planni ng
Dcv*lorrrncnt Sotvir-:cs Ccttcr
f Floith Rurcho Dvc, 3d Floor
Los Vegas, Nevada 89106
PA ID
Las Vugas, NV
Permlt No. 1630
Return $ervice Requested

Offtcinl Notice of Pubtic llenring
REEEru
il)
lf
urtt
ciity Hrll
JUL
you wish to file your plotst or support on lhis lequest, check tlte
tr
2016
triitii"",",T'
apprqrrlate bx blw ln.l retum this carrl in an cnvelopo with pol;ttgs t0 the
Deprtrnent of Planning at the addn lited alrve, fax this side of th,s carri to
(702) 464-?499. lf you would Jike to contact
Council Rcprescntativc,
please call (702) 229-6405.
1P51Bgj101B
SUPPORT
this Request
case:wVR-6'1788
HUTCHENS TEBFY J & CATHERINE M

7A32 BUSTI REST ST
LASVEGAS NV 89149
OPPOSE
this Request
lbr your comment$,

wvR"64788 & WVR.64789 [PRJ-647041
lanning Commission Meeting f 711212016
lcase use available blank space on card
'iT
i'
1:]{i/..{i1r
.f
fcii,r
,r. ,..+
,llrlillfl,tt rrrl,rrr,,fllllllf llllrtrlrf llrrlrf f ll,ll,r,lff
ff ,
f
%5q?
Cty of
L-as Vegas
PRSRT
FIRST CLASS MAIL
Departmerrt of Planning
Development Services Cenler
-13:
U.S, Postage
PA ID
Norlh Racho Drive, 3' Floor
Las Vegas, \V
Permh No. 1 3
Las Vegas, Nevada 89 106

RFCEIVED
JUL
11 2016
Clty of Las Vegas

Dept. of Planning
Flall
ity Hll
tf
a55kt
tdg
If you wish to file your protest r support on this request, check
the
appropriate bcrx belorv and renm this card in an envelope rvith postage ro thc
Departrnent of Planning at the address listed above, fax this side o1'this card to
OO2j 464-7499. If you would like to contact your Council Representative'
please call (?0?) 129-405.
12s1 gB1
I-] r .srJPPoRr Vl toPPsE

f_l rr,i,. Requxr ,nlrhis Request
\ryvR-4788 & WYR-4789 [PRJ-64704]
pra.ning commisson M:fgT""fl./,1.#?;n=t,,,*
gd
r:
ir,
r.
,:
case: wv*s4788
1o1g
BECKI.4AN LLLAN D TRUST

l{,, lll'
'I
lfl,,
I'1,
lllll l,,t,l ll' l,

I
l,
' 'f
lll tl l,,
'lf
J I
dv'.ogfLolnr
53-5q?
REEffED
o
J
I
iul I 1 2016
lity of Las Vegas
tepartment of Planning
revelopment Services Center
North Rancho Drive, 3il Floor
,as Vegas, Nevada 89106
#-
/( r'r,\e-,q-
FaQ-,'t':-'a -'
City Hall
Zr/-
'J
request,
ppropriate tiox below and return this card in an envelope with postage to the
)epartment of Planning at the address listed above, fax this side of this card to
702\ 464-'1499. lf you would like to contact your Council Representative,
f ease caf l (702) 229-6405.
Y.,144.----Lb
you wish to file your protest or support on this
I SUPPORT
this Request
*.1
--4.J4f.
6t5
PRSR
FIBSTCLASSMAIL
U.S, Poslage
PAI D
Las Vegas, NV
Permit N0.1630
&LL-
o:
Dept. of planriing

lo
tity of Las Veoas
.13
I OPPOSE
this Request
'lease use available blank space on card for your comments.
a-
WVR-64788
Case:
't25t 8S11008
FITCH FAMILY TRUST
FITCH RANDALL G & DIANE M TBS
9485 GRAND HEIGHT AVE
LAS VEGAS NV 8S149.0124
ryvR-64788 & \ryVR-64789 [PRJ-64704]

'lanning Commission Meeting of 711212016
wvr'- 47gg q''-v-
- '47 g?
f,L
53-sLtP
PHSRT
Cty of Las Vegas
Depaflffil
flflgTCLrSS MAIL
of PlDrinB
U.S. Poslage
Developmenc SerYices Cmts

333 Noltb Racho Drjve.3d Flmr
Las Yegas, Nevada 891 0
PID
Return Service
REruE
JUL tr 1
lf
you rvish to
file your pfotest or suppoil on
{?O2)
4+?499. If you would like to contact
yr>ur
'-*'iri,,,-H*'*
tity of Las Vegas
cherh the
this
appropriate bo belorv d relurn this card in an envelope

Department af Planning at the address listed sbove, tix tltis
poctage lo tbe
of lhis crd 1o
Rerresenrare,
2016
Uept. of Planning
case: I'fJR!1708
2518403009
KLLY JMES A DEJISE TFOPE
96A1 SOLAFI AVE
LASVES M/ 89149-1907
I
your conrment$.
lryR-6r?ss & 1\\rR-64789 |PRI-647041

ptannrng commission
Me;tsot#Tf$l{_,
t9 :l .t. {. 5
t,,lfLI,,,Ilf,llf fll,ill,ft,ll,,f ,tftf ,fll,,J llllrl,,lf
53.-5q,?
City ol Las Vegas

l)cpartnrcnt of Planni ng
l)cvclopment Servces Ccntcr
333 n'orth Rancho l)rivc, 3'd Floor
PRSRT
FIRSTCLASS MAIL
U.S, Poslage
PAID
Las Vegas, NV
Permil No. 1630

RECEIVED
JUL
6tt
City Hall
tr
2016
City of l-as Veqas

Dept. of Flann'ng
A
t{
qryHl
Ldi,o Mp
s:s g
ll' you rvish to 1le your
protest
or supporl on {his requcst. chcck
thc
appropriate box below antl return this carci in an cnvelope with postagc to tbe
lix this sidc ol this card to
Dpartment of Planning at the address listcd
your Council Rcpresentative.
0A 4e-7499. l[ you wou ld like to
please call (702) 229-6405.
I SUPPORT
this Request
251 841 0002
Case: WVR64788
SCOTT CAMILLE & BRENDON

7369 SILENT WAER WAY
LAS VEGAS NV 89149
OPPOSE
Request
Plea.se use available blank .space on
your commerts.
wvR-64?88 & WVR-64789 [PRJ-64704]

Planning Commission Meeting of
l/l2l20
r;,F
F,
J.
*i.s
'llfll"ll"'lhil'l'liltilltltfll"flll"llt'lll"'llllll
s35.{
City of Las Vegas
PRSRT
Dcpanrncnt of Planrting
l)evclopnrcnt Services Center
Las Vegas, Ncvatja 89106
FIRST CLASS MAIL
U.S. Postage
PAID
Las Vegas, NV
Permit N0. 1630

RECEruE
'JUL
Hall
11
216
City of Las Vegas

Dept. of Planning
tes
lf
you wish to lle your protest or supporl on this rcqtrest. check
the
appropriatc box bclow and relurn this curd in an envelopc with postage to the
Dcpanment of Planning at lhc address listed above. lax this side ol'this card to
(102) 464-7499. ll'you would like to contact your Council Reprcsentativc,
plcuse call (7 02) 2?9 -6405.
SUPPORT
this Request
t OPPOSE
this lequest
1251gt02016
case: wVR-64788
HOOKE ROBER D & DONNA J

9675 ELKHOHN RD
LAS VEGAS NV 89I49.1911
Please use available blank space on ctrd for your comments
wvR-64788 & lvvR-6478e [PRJ-64704]

i;?." r;r;,ri. i*J 'i:
','lfltl,ll"l,ltt'llllrltlll'r,ltrlf,f l'fll'lfll'fflll"
SS5LTP
City of Las Vegas

l)epartment ol Planning
PRSRT
FIRST CLASS MAIL
U.S. Postage
l)evelopnrcnt Servi ccs Cenlcr

333 North Rancho l)rive. 3d Floor
Las Veeas. Nevada 8910
PAID
Las Vegas, NV
Permil No. 1630

REGEIVD
11
JUL
2016
Oity of Las Vegas

Dept. of Planning
ll'you rvish to file your protest or suPporl on this rcqust' check the
cpproprirlc box h:low and rcturn lhis card in arr envclopc with postage to thc
Departmcnt of Planning at thc address lisled lbove. lax this side ol this card to
QA 461-7499. ll'you n'ould like 10 conlact your Council Reprcsentativc,
please call (1 02) 229 -6405.
I SUPPORT
1251 840101
Case: WVR-M788
GBAVES WITLIAM R & M}CHELLE C

7365 N JENSEN ST
I OPPOSE
this Request
this Request
Please use available blank space on card for your comlents.
wvR-64788 & WVR-64789 [PRJ-tr704]

Planning Commission Meeting of ]ll2/2O16
J.
.tl? rri';i".rF
J:
,5
ri5
,'
lt
llr l,l. I't' lll
lrll'lrtlt lt', llt, J'!lltt, n illt'llt n,'
5V-9,?
City of Las Vegas

Developmcnt Services Ccnter

/^*
PRSRT
FIBST CLASS MAIL
U.S. Postage
PAlD
Las Vegas, NV
Prmir No. 1630
REEE{VED
\ ustt
rc
JUL tr 1
ity tlall
2016
Oity of Las Vegas

Dept. of Planning
lf you wish to file your protest or suppon on this request, check the
lppropriatc box below and rcturn this card in an envelope with postage to thc
Department of Planning ( lhe ddrcss listed abovc. lax this side ol this card to
QA 464-7499. lf you would like to contact your Council Rcpresentative.
please call (702) 229-6405.
I SUPPORT
this Request
12sjB41ooo3
case: wVR'64788
ZACHARY FAMILY TRUST

ZACHAFIY KEETON DALE & JULIE TRS
7349 SILENT WATEB WAY
LAS VEGAS NV 89149
ffir;,'r,::.,
Please use available blank space on card lor your commenls
wvR,4788 & WVR-6478e [PRJ-4704]

Pl ann i n g
Commiss ion
i"t+g ",J,,.?#,3!
*,
5 f -'
,llt.t il, lilt
ll,
tlt,,t
T,t ilt, ltllt,, " tt tt ttilt,ttlntt,tt
svsq?
lAlL
U.S. Postage
PA ID
Las Vegas, NV
Permit No, 1630
lo6
Cry
I SUPPORT
xall
WSTHOFF JAMES J & KORINNE S

7220 FERN MEADOW ST
LAS VEGAS NV 89149
Ef,?,',iy;:,,
this Rcquest
Please use available blank space on card for your cornments.
wvR-64788 & WVR-64789 [PRJ-64704]

iiliiilf f r+
,l,fl rfl,l,rlrf;
ly,,t,t,lI,lillllt.iltlillllrt,l,
ll,
53-5qP
City of Las Vegas

Departmcnt of Plonning
Development Services Ccnler
333 North Rancho Drivc. 3'd Floor
PESRT
FIFSTCLASS MAIL
U.S. Poslage
PAID
Las Vegas, NV
Permit No. 1630
Lns Vegas. Ner'ada 891 06
RECIVED

Offcial Notice of Public Hearing
JUL
o6r,
2016
CIty of Las Veoas

Dept. of Ptaning
(ity
Hall
If you wish lo lle your prolest or support on lhis
request. check lhe
appropriatc box below and rcturn this card in an cnvelope rvith postage to thc
Dcpartment of Planning at thr: address listecl above. lax this side of this clrtJ to
QA 4&-'1499. If you would likc to contact your Council Representative,
plerse call (102) 229-6405
I SUPPORT
this Requcst
Caso: WVR-64788
1 2s1 841 0006

MINOSKI FICKY J & MAFY E
I OPPOSE
this Request
Please use avilable blank space on card for your colnllenfs
wvR-64788 & WVR-64789 [PRJ-4704]

_:i ," ,,_iHLr;--tIt.. J. i
J.
+t
l,\
r l, t,,
ll,l f tlll, il, n it,t r
11,
tl
t\ ililt il|ry, t,
s7-5q?
City of Las Vegas

Depanment of Panning
PRSRT
FIRSTCLASS MAIL
U.S. Postage

333 North Rancho Drive.3'd Floor
PA ID
Las Vegas, NV
Permil No. 1630

REEHVD
JUL
.tr
I 2016
roBtt
Ii you wish to filc your
City
protest
City of Las Vegas

Dept. of Planning
llall
or
support
on this request, check the
appropriate box below and return this card in an envelope with postagc to the
Department of Planning at the address listed abovc, fax this side of this card to
(7tJ2) 461-7499. If you would like to contact your Council Represenlativc,
please call (70?) ?29-6405.
I SUPPORT
this Request
2519s1 1022
Case: WVR8|788
BAO GOPAL
L SUSIE
7111 NARROW PEAKST
LAS VEGAS NV 89I49.0160
I OPPOSE
this Rcqucst
Please use available blank space on crd for your comments.
wvR-64788 & \ryVR-64789 [PRJ-64704]

Planning Commission Meeting of 7llZl2tl6
ii;i".ri}
i r: 4r
ilt il n,
ul
l, ilt
lltn, lt l, r l, lr rr, rlll rr
il,
llu I t
53-5q?
Cty ofLs Veg

Depanme.nt of Pfning
Develapment
ll3
PFSRT
FIRSf CISSM'L
U.S. foslaqe
Seoies Cenltr
PID-
Norih Rocho Die. 3'd Flr

L Vegtr. A-.etd 8910
Retsrn
las Vegas, tlV

Pemtllo. 1630
Servic.e Req uested
Ilicial Nolice of Public Hearng
J
J s pprr I i$o sr{ETLtgkrs
tstf br Noi tq-?fl,
.f po'4 \l)rg
RHCfVD
JUL
ll ynr
u'isb ro file your protst or sppfl on this rcguest,

pprofrire box bx d retutn this cud in an enlelop* silh postg the
Depnnt of PlanDing at rhe rddress listed abore. fax his side of this crd to
jAZi 464-7499. If you uould like o contct your Coumil Rqnre*ntatire.
nlere crll 72 229-64O5.
l2519toaoo
cs: wv'647a
CIISHONTREVOB JA},IES A MICHELLE O

9690 wlTlrGAv
LS VGS tV 83149-1392
20t6
Cit| of Las Veoes
eft. of ptanriing
e
Ir
,,g"txnrr",#}Ft.***n*
-
!vrR,6478E & WVR.789 IPRI-64?041
Id Planning- Commssion
lr{eeting of
lll2t216
alf*Pi
6i
rrrJt,1,,
lrilrtlflllJllfl trlil,,,l,ht,rl,f
1,{,rf frf,f ,
I
I
Sth
5t\?
Cily of las Veg

ot PltDniog
f.eveloomer Sen ires Cf, ntu
3ll N{;b RDcho D.ir.c. 3d l.-loo
Las Vegar- Nevsd 8906
PRSRT
Dpanffit
FIBSI
PIDLas Vegas. NV
f sg,pp". fiJo c rtr-t-t5 hts

fwr f bo Nl
Sr;pp..^-f \nJv/(- tq"rl -
t{All
Pemit No. t630
(Xficial Ntlice of Public Hearing
CITASS
U.S- Poslaoe
RECTVE
il
frr xa
r-
=
I
If you *ish to fle ctr protsa or spfton o this reqest' check the
appropriale box t*low tfil rBtum (his rd in an envclope s'i(h poslage lo he
Depanment of Planing tt lbe addrcss listed abore' fax this side ofthis card ro
(7O2) {ll-?499- If you ould tike lo conttt yout Coumil Represenfalire.
plase call (?m) ?29-6405.
'ras191ozoal
JUL 1T
c:ltw*'64748
OISIIOTVOB & MICHELLE

s690 wllTf6
LAS VEGAS NV A9t49-392
flr:lr:; f,r,::ff::.,
2I]16
trrfLirT:rff
Pease use ayalable blank spacUon card for your comnrents-
& r4'IlR{789 {PRJ-,17041

Planning Commisson Me.etlng ol J|WA.6
WVR-64788
"
i?
g5t4
i3rifr:r"ir=j
tlal, jhJth'r,,Jf
t,,,lil,nlll,flilt 't\,,il,t' t,, ilfi
hi
l
f
7
57A
sut P

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
WVR-64789 - WAIVER RELATED TO GPA-64786, ZON-64787 AND WVR-64788 PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/ OWNER: KULKA LAND, LLC - For possible action on a
request for a Waiver TO ALLOW PRIVATE STREETS TO BE DEVELOPED TO NONPUBLIC STREET STANDARDS BEHIND A GATE on 5.0 acres at the northwest corner of
Elkhorn Road and Grand Canyon Drive (APN 125-18-403-003), R-E (Residence Estates) Zone
[PROPOSED: R-1 (Single Family Residential)], Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-64704]. Staff recommends
DENIAL.
C.C.: 9/21/2016
23
RECOMMENDATION:
3. Concern email

paper use, backup
A 7 7 A b A 7
WVR-64789
b 7 7 7
A 777777
77 7 7 *77
77A *77
77 7 7 *
77777* 777 777 777b 7b 7

7b 77777777777 7
7 7777 7777777
77777 777
7 7
77777 777b 7b 77 7b 7 7
7777777777 7 77b 7 7
77A 777A 7 7 77777 777
777777
b 7

A
77 7
7 *
77 77
7 A
7 7 77
7777b 7
777
7A 7 77
A 7 * 7 7
7 7b 77 *7
A 7 77
77
77 7
A
7 777 7777
b 7 7 77
7A 7
77
7A 7 7
77
A 7 7A
7 7 *777
A 77 *7 7
b 77
77 7
77
7 7
b 7 7 7
7A 7
A b A 7 A 7A 7b 7
b 77
7777
A 77 *7
7 7
b 7
7A 7
A 7 A b 7 b 7b
b 7 7 *
A 77b 7b 7
7777 77
b 7
7A 7 7
77 777 777777 7
7 77 77*777777777
7 7 7
7
7 7 7 *77
777 777
7 A 7 7
7777 7
77 77
7 77777b 7
WVR-64789
7 A
7 7 77
7
7A 77
77 77777 7
7777 77
77 777
777
A 77 *A 7
Nora Lares
Subject:
FW: GPA-64786, ZON-64787, WVR-647 89
RECEIVD
-----Origina I Message----From: Michelle Imailto:mddishon2872@email.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 07,201611:01 PM
To: sam@cherrylv.com
Cc: Nicole Eddowes
Su bject: GP A-647 86, ZON-647 87, WVR-64789
JUL
II
2016
tty of Las Veoas
Dept. of ptanriing
Hello Commissioner Cherry,

I am
writing to express my concern regarding a rezoning request of 5 acres next to my home.
Kulka Land, LLC is asking for L7 homes on a 5 acre parcel where 8 homes is what it is currently zoned for. lt's also in the
RNP which we continually try to fight to preserve here in Las Vegas.
We have asked the developer to work with us and ask for something with less density that we both can agree on.
We hope you will look at the negative impact this could have in our area and deny this application.
Thank you,
Michelle Dishon
Subrnitted after flnd agende
:*eflttlln
+P

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
TMP-64790 - TENTATIVE MAP RELATED TO GPA-64786, ZON-64787, WVR-64788,
AND WVR-64789 - ELKHORN & GRAND CANYON - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/
OWNER: KULKA LAND, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Tentative Map FOR A
17-LOT SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION on 5.0 acres at the northwest
corner of Elkhorn Road and Grand Canyon Drive (APN 125-18-403-003), R-E (Residence
Estates ) Zone [PROPOSED: R-1 (Single Family Residential)], (Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-64704].
Staff recommends DENIAL.
C.C.: 9/21/2016
30
RECOMMENDATION:

paper use, backup
A 7 7 A b A 7
TMP-64790
b 7 7 7
A 777777
77 7 7 *77
77A *77
77 7 7 *
77777* 777 777 777b 7b 7

7b 77777777777 7
7 7777 7777777
77777 777
7 7
77777 777b 7b 77 7b 7 7
7777777777 7 77b 7 7
77A 777A 7 7 77777 777
777777
b 7

A
77 7
7 *
77 77
7 A
7 7 77
7777b 7
777
7A 7 77
A 7 * 7 7
7 7b 77 *7
A 7 77
77
77 7
A
7 777 7777
b 7 7 77
7A 7
77
7A 7 7
77
A 7 7A
7 7 *777
A 77 *7 7
b 77
77 7
77
7 7
b 7 7 7
7A 7
A b A 7 A 7A 7b 7
b 77
7777
A 77 *7
7 7
b 7
7A 7
A 7 A b 7 b 7b
b 7 7 *
A 77b 7b 7
7777 77
b 7
7A 7 7
77 777 777777 7
7 77 77*777777777
7 7 7
7
7 7 7 *77
777 777
7 A 7 7
7777 7
77 77
7 77777b 7
TMP-64790
7 A
7 7 77
7
7A 77
77 77777 7
7777 77
77 777
777
A 77 *A 7
TMP-64790
TMP-64790
TMP-64790
TMP-64790
A7b
bA77A7b
TMP-64790
7
7
7 7 7
7 7 7 7
7 7 7
Ab7 bA
TMP-64790
A 7 A 7b b
A 7 A 7b
7777777777 7
777 7
77 77 7
A 77 777777777
7777 7 7
7777
77 77
777777
7777777
7
7
7
7
7777777
77b 7 777 77
77777 77777
777777
777 7
77
777777 7 77
777 777 7777
7777 77777 7
777*7 7 77 7
7777
777777
7
77
77777
77 77777 77 7
7777 77 7
77777777
777777 7 7
777 7777777
77
77777777
7 7777 7777
7777777
7777 7 7777 7
7 7777
777777
7777777 77
77
777
7777 777
777777777777
77 7 77 7
A 7 A
7 7 77777777
7777 77 77
7777 7777
7 7777777
77777
7 7 7 7 7777
7 777 *77777
7 77777 777

A 77 7777777 7 77
7777
7 77777777
A 777 7b 7
77777777777 7
7 77
777
7777
7 7 7 77
7 7
77
777
7 7 77b 7 A 7
TMP-64790
A 7 *7 7b *7
TMP 64790
Kulka Land, LLC
NWC Elkhorn Road & Grand Canyon Drive

Proposed 17 single family unit residential development.
Proposed Use
Average Daily Traffic (ADT)
AM Peak Hour
9.57
SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED [DWELL]
PM Peak Hour
17
0.75
1.01
163
13
17
Existing traffic on nearby streets:

Elkhorn Road
PM Peak Hour (heaviest 60 minutes)
2,364
189
Grand Canyon Drive

2,929
234
Traffic Capacity of adjacent streets:

Elkhorn Road
Grand Canyon Drive
Adjacent Street ADT Capacity

22,860
20,320
This project will add approximately 163 trips per day on Elkhorn Rd. and Grand Canyon Dr. Elkhorn is currently at about 10
percent of capacity and Grand Canyon is at about 14 percent of capacity. After this project, Elkhorn is expected to be at
about 11 percent of capacity and Grand Canyon to be at about 15 percent of capacity.
Based on Peak Hour use, this development will add into the area roughly 17 additional cars, or about two every seven
minutes.
Note that this report assumes all traffic from this development uses all named streets.
tUL/11/2016/[,f0N 04: 48
FAX
PIll
P 001/001
No
City of Las Vcgns

Dpartrent of Pls.trnini
PRSRT
FIHSTCLAS$ MAIL
U.$. Pcstage
Development Scrvices Center

333 Nth Rancho Drive,3d Floor
PAID
Las Vegas, NV
Pemit No. 1630
Return Service Requesred

Offlciel Notrce of Public Ilearing
RECEIVD
JUL
20i6
City of Las Veoas

Dept, of Ptanni-ing
l.irv l'.lall
fr
If you wish to fil your protest or support on this rqust, chck the
appropriate box below tnd retufii this card in an envelope with postge to th
Dpfiffierit of Planning at tlro f,.ddffiss listed above, fax this side sf this card to
ra5lsloaoa4
cs:r,'47e0
KALTENBACH RNALD L
MARTIN SHAHON A
7075 N JENSEN ST
L,A.S VEGAS NV 8S140"135S
TMP-647e0 [PRI-64704]
Planning Commission Meeting of '7lt2l?t6
l?
,f#T,iaii
J.
ii$
f 4fr
ff
llf
, l ,
f
tlf llf ilt Llt,,
t,ll,, lt tt lt l,ilt,,ll,ll,,tt lllltf
3ubmitted atter tinal agen$
iztevltrlttffiSS
Jul 07 16 09:1
1a
p.4
860440-3534
Langhammer Law Office
Ciry cl'Las Vugas
PRSFT
l)upartnrcnt ol' Pllnnirrg
FIFST CLASS MAIL

U.S. Poslage
cvcllrpg Scr\, ir:us Csrtr

.i3l Norh t{arrho t)rivc. .l'd l.'cor
PA ID
Las Vcgirs. Ncvcla 61106
las
Vegas, lrV
Permil l.;o. 1630

Official Noticc of Publc I'Iearing
ro6t!
ll
CiyHal?
you rvish (o t'ile :/our protcst of suppo on this rcqucs(. clrcck
rhc
apLtropriatc br.r belorv and return this cartf in lr envelopc wirh postirgc to the
cpannrcnl ol'Planning r rhe ddres$ lisr.cd ab0vc. fax his sirjc of this cunl to
('/02) 46+-7.199. If ,r'ou would

plcase crl I 0 O?'t 2?9.6405.
o contact your Council Rcprcscntativq
fO32
I .SLIPPORT
t2Sl9S1
TANGIiAMMEN LLOYO
85 I,IANTIC FIVER RD
f OPPOSE
Rcquest
this Rcquc-st
Plcasc use avilablc blank
ca6s: IMP.G{7so
wArEFtFoR0 cT o638s-2537
card for your conntcnls
rNtP-64790 [PRJ-4704]
Planning Commission Meeting of 711212016
l_-r:if i.ir-.i
,':f:i,::,:-:j;
__
ttl\:lfU",1il,t|.Ul'l,,yl',l!t,'l,jhJf l,l,t
85 Niantic
fuver Road
Waterford, CT 06385
Iuly 7 ,2016
r'ia facsinrile {702) 464-7499

Ciry* of Las Vegas
RECIVE
Developmenl Services Center
333}forth Rancho Drive,3'd Floot
JUL
Re:
iI
016
tity
of Las Vegs
Pept. 0f Ptanning
\t'vR-64788 &
\, VR-64789
GPA-4786 &.ZON-64787
TlvfP-64790
Dear Department of Planning:

Enclosed herervilh please find the cards registering m,'opposilion- More specihcally- the
'request for re-zoning is conlrary to the Comprehelsive PIan of Development already adopled bv-
ttteCifyofLasVegas. Thereexistsnoreasontore-zonforthedeveloper'sberleht. Thesole

basis ior the zoning request is for the developer's bene1 and nol for the citizens ofthe Ciry... of
Las Vegas. Accordingly, I would requesl that the Department olPlanning anor the responsible

RespectlullY,
Lloyd L. Lan$tammer
Enclosures {3)
55?
RCEIVED
JUL
City of t$ Vegr
Dqpartnnnt ofPlanniog
11
2016
PRSRT
FIR$ICLASSMAIL
City of Las Vegas

Dept. of Planning
Developmcnt Scvices Oentcr

333 North Rnho D,rive,3.Floor
Las Vegas, Ncvadn 89106
U.S,
Pos!e
PAIDL \,gas, NV
Permit No. 1630
Return Sevice Requested
-flrys w'.1.
OfHcial Notlce of PutIic Hearing
lnorn e>
*o gw)a,Ll
d*,vl (t
P,, P"r9
d,r', v.t--
If you wish ro tJJ your
pfplst
or
s,
ot lh-i req.ucit chlr
'e
appropriae box belo*, and rhir rhi$ card

rvelope with postage to thc
Deparrnent of t lanning at e aldress Jistd 'bove, fat this side of this card to
(70?) 464-'1499, lf you rvould like i0 ontsct your Counci! Rerreserrtarive,
pleose
ca
ll
Q V) 229
1.l0l0
C3:
l25t gi
ABAHAS SEEO TBUST
P o 80x 7t0895
tAS VEGAS NV 8913C
-6105.
TMP-&t7e0
I SIJPFRT
tftis Requcsr
Please us vailabl
blmk
Nil?,'n,
space on card ror your omfiients
TII{P.64790 [PRJ-1704]
prannine commission
MfEU
'f!Tlrp
s'5 gL-h
lti,, f ltlltilllil,,
llt ,
{,t,
y1l'
filt\, rl'ltn,l, 4l,l
55?
City ol Las Vcgas
PRSRT
FIFSTCiSS ltAlL
Departmcnt of Planning
U.S. Postage
Developmenr Sen'ices Center

Las V egas. Nevada 89 I 06
PAID
Las Vegas, NV
Permit No. 1630
Rturn Service Requested

REEruD
JUL tr 1
I0!1fi
Oity of Las Vegas

Dept. of Planning
#J*h5t
If you wish to l'ile your protest or
suPPort
on this request- check
2016
the
appropriate box below and rctllrn this eard in an envelope with postage to the
Depanrnent of Planning at the address listed above, lx tbis side of this card lo
(702) 464-7499. Tf you wotlid like to contact your Council Representative,
pleasc
call (7O2)
229
-64t5.
Case: TMP-64790
125191 10012
KAEV JAN ANDERS & INGRID ELIZABE

LASVEGAS NV 89149
I OPPOSE
SLTPPORT
this Request
this Request
o card for your comments.
TMP-64790 [PRJ-64704]
Planning Commission Meeting of l/1212416
;T
;I;j.ii;ar :. i3.r .-if;
l,l
lf
Jf
I,f
,f 1,, lt
f ,, [n ll tll,l',,, lt Jf l l'' J,'f ' f

,
s5?
ld
Z69B-86-L8
slopuv
dO0:0 9 L q0
lnl
Jul-.06.2016 04:11
PM The Hutchens Family
PAGE. 2/
7022430296
City of Los Vegur

l)eportnrent of PI snning
PHSRT
FIRSTCLASS MAIL
U.S, Postaoe
I)evelopm*nt Services Cent*

33ll North Rrncho Drive, 3d Floor
Las Vegaq Nevada 89106
At'
Lae Vegas, NV
Permit No, 1630
Return Servlce Requested

Offlclnl Notlce of Public Hearing
RCEruD
(il.y l{all
rDwrS
JUL 1 1
I1' you wish to file your pfotest or suppofl on this requestf check the
appropriam trox below and retnrn thi$ cflrd in an envelrrpe witlr postage to the
eprrtment o1'Planning t the addre listecl above, fhx this side o[ lhis card to
(?02) 464-7499. If you rpould lilce to onrecr your Council Rcprcscntrtive,
please call (72) ?29-640..
20'16
City of Las Vegas

Dept. of Planning
1AS1BBil0l6
()PPC)SE
SUPPORT
this Rqu61
Csi lMP.647s0
HUCHENS TERRY J & CATHERINE M

73$P FIUSTIC CHEST ST
LAS VEGAS NV 89149
this Requert
Flease use avaiJable blank space on cald for your commnts.
rMP,64790 [PRJ"64704]
Flarrning Cornn:ission Meeting of 711212016
I ri1';'
frlf,tfiTr,Tf.{idi
J.
trffi
,',r.,s
tfllh[il,,lll[tlt'lll,tl4lllll,lt',,'ll,'ltl,,Fl'illll
S5?
E7/EE,rZEl6
FGE EI/1
REID SI"IITH
EE: ?5P1 7828498571
ity of Las Vegas

Dpaftmenl ot Plnnning
PFSRT
FIRST CLASS MI
U.$. Postage
I)evelonnrent Services Csnte
PAD
333 North Rancho Drive, 3td Floor

Las Vogas, Nvad 89106
Las Vegas, NV
Ptfrnit No. 1631
This area is zoned RNP Resldental Nelghborhood Preservation. The current zoning regulatlons allow for
a total of 10 homes on 5 ecres, whlch all of us in this area have honored. Dana and Reid Smlth strongly
opose 1.7 resldential lots being developed on 5
zonng
acre;wnicfs direct violation of thmrUp
N-H{rH
JUL
"oa"'*;If
you wish to file your ptrtest or suPpgrt on this request, chec.k
the
epproprile bqx below and renr tlris ccid in an envelope with postage to the
Depa{tment of Planning at the address listed above, fax ttus side of this cad to
(702) 4-7499, If you wsuld like. t cantct your {Jouncil R+presentrttiv,
plese cll
(7m) 229-6405.
2016
ffifLiriff;
C.ei TM-647P0
'1251841005
SMTH HID S E DANA L CO-TRS
7309 SILNT WATER WAY
L-AS VEGAS NV 89149
l\ ./l r clPPsE
l. this Requesr
I SUPPCIRT
this Request
Please use available blark spad on card for -your cottunents.
TMP-647e0 [PRI-6,+704]
Flanning Commission Metittg of
.f
:-
7117121116
i:'1.i31,tF-rf
'-
i ,r
lf,fff
rrf
lf lf ,1 r,fl' ll
lllll' lt,'l lilt,f rlll'l'llf l
5?
Ciry of Las vegs

epartmert of Pl arn'rng
Dc'ielopment Ssrvs Cenr
333 orth Rancho Drive- 3il Floor
Lar Vegas, Neuada 891C6
Return Service Reqrrstd

Otricial Notice of Public llearing
rl
PRSRT
FIRSI ILASS MAIL
U.S. Po6le
PI D
Las Veg, NY
Pernft tlo.1630
surftr.T-g{tr
,o rlortcs S{FrqU$ f
lgf tr tsr o*rY I
-
Hall
JU
2l]16
trfitH',.
Il you rvish to file yur
requesq check e
appropriate bo.r bclow ad renrn this crd in an envelope .ilh posage to the
Dpali of Planoing at rhe adfuss lisrd aboye, lar tlris side of this card
(702) 464-7499. If you would ikc to conlact your Council Reprsentlve,
please call (704) 2?9-6105.
[mnx
prolest
or suport on this
c*:lMPs790
12slg4foo1o
RIPPEY KENT & ttIABY E

7390 SILENT WTf WAY
LASVEGASNV 8!14S
[fil?,'ffi'r*
for your comrnenls,
Trlf P-64790 {PRI-64?41

Plannine- Commission Meetins ol 7/12f2016
iEi
#i,;1i1'=i Si'.it
JJ r
j,rr, r,. t f, ft
lif
r f,
lit
iJ f
,f
ift
J, lr i,
lliffJ,
I 'J, 'T
s57
PRSR
City of Los Vcgas
FIFSTCLSS MAIL
ilILL
Development Sen'ices Center

Las Ve.'qas, Nevada 89106
Las Vegas, NV
Permit Nc. 1630
Return Servce Requested

RECEIV
JUL
Hll
If
you wish to file your protest or support on fhis requesl' check
thi; Request
Please use available bank
2016
Oity of Las Veoas

Dept" of ptanning
the
appropriate box belo*'and returrr this canl in an envelope rvitlr postage to the
Depanrnent of Planning at lhe address listcd above, fax this side of this card tn
U02) 464-'1499. If you would like to contact your Council Represenladve,
please call (7 02) 229 -64t5
I SUPPORT
l1
*ll*
tase: TMP'64790
12518811019
BECKMAN LILLIAN D TRUST

LS VEGAS NV 89.I49.0125
your comrerrts.
TrvrP-64790 [PRJ- 64704]

Pl annin
C onr rni
ss
io
n Me.eigg
3 i:
ld
'
of.ll??.ql.q,*
t.''air-.L
"ff'
J.
'{'#
l,,llll,t ' ll, ' ll 'l,tJll,,,t,,
li I llt ll
'
't
l,' 'lJl,l I li,,,,lfJ,,

dtZ:ZO
9!
0 tnt
55P
IIECEIVED
JUL tr 1
City of Las Vegas

Departmenl o[Planning
Develo pment Services Center
333 Nonh Rancho Drive, 3'd Floor
l6tt
-'--CTtyf Las Vegas

Dept. of Planning
ryPZ #*
Return Service
Official Notice of Public Hearing.e'.,
2016
PRSRT
FIRST CLASS tdAIL
U.S, Poslaos
PAID-
/-r-4
-A-a., -(1 e-.4-/
ity Hall
If
you wish io file your protes or support on this

appropriate box below ad return this card in an envetope with postage to the
Depnment of Planning rt the address listed above, lx this side ol'this card to
(7?\ 464-7499. If you woutd like to contnct your Council Represenlatve,
please call (702) 229-6405.
I SUPPORT
this Request
Las Vegas, NV
Permit No. 1630
I OPPOSE
this Request
Please use available blank space on card for your
a4^(
*.f
&
'12518S11008
Cas: TMP-fl790
FITCH FMLY TRUST

FITCH RANDALL G & DIANE M TRS
9485 GRAND HEGHT AVE
LASVEGASNV 89149.0124
TMP.64790 [PRJ-64704]
Planning Commission Meeting of 7l1212016
ll
5sP
City of l-as Vgas
PBSfiT
Deprrmsnt of Planning
Dereloprnrnt Services Ccn
333 Norrh Rcho Dri,3d Floor
Las Vegar, Nevada 89 106
FIMT.S$MAIL
U.S. Poslage
PAI
Las Vegas, NV
PsntNo.
Return SeruceRequfffd
ffiddNotce of Public Hearing
CV
I6tt
REEruD
ffilf:i"",""'f;
ttal
If
you wish ) fie your protcs or support on this reques c}ck the
pproprate b+x belorv and retrrn this card in aR eavelope $'ith postage lo he
al te address listed above, fax this ide of thi$ card to
46+
1'ou trurld like to contc your Cconcil RepftsflTalive,
pleasc
rastg4{3og
casE: T4P479
KELIY JI.IES fi & ENIS TOP

36S1 SOLB AYE
IAVEGAS NV 89149-1907
Pleasc
your conuilrts.
TIvIP{479 IPRJ -647&l]

Planning Commission Meeting of T1A2016
iiif'i.iF!I
ii1.i.
llf
f ,,
l,,l{Jf
Jtl tlf
ltiLIlt,,il JIulllllr'li,
li rLrl,Jtlf
s5?
RGEIVD
JUL
vega.r
Pepartnent af Planqirl
Developmettt Services Ce.fl ter
L Vegas, Neveda 8910ti
Crty of
La.s
11
2016
PB$RT
FIRST CLASS f\,tAll
Gity of Las Vegas

Dept" of Planning
U.$. Poslage
FAI
Permit No,'1630
Return $ervi*e Requtcd

Oftcial Notice of Public Hearing
-nl, g
rrp ryt
'\
tu
itV ttotl
If you wish to file your protst or snpport on thig reqoest, check the
rpprr)pfiate Lrrrx below fld ftufl his card in m errvtlopo with postage to the
Department. of L'lanning a[ dre. addrss ]isted bv, f.r this side of this cflrd to
If you would like to ontst
your Counci! Represerurtive,
Fles cnll (702) ?29-645.
v{
t"-F8
l#,'
e>
s-y1
CLv
PA:4 464-7499.
Las Vegas, NV
ruA
rr-t-
l
'lr\- y\
w rn"h)
VTLI
i*u*ln^[*1
UL.
Csei TMF++79
1251311t0tU
ABRAHAII'S SEED TRUST
P o Box Tsogss
LASVEGASNV 6913
I SUPPRT
Wil?Iffr,
tlris Request
Ple:ase use
available blank sp-ace on catd for youf comulIts.
rMF.647e0 [PRJ-647041
PlanningConrmissi.onMeetjigof
J
;il
L-l-?[-lf...
l-iTrl.}iriiil I
lil':l
J-
Jr.:i
,l\,r,4 ltlltlllt ,llt, n r,t I|I,f IIIII,r,
l,
h wI, ll, I
f,s?
City of Lro Veg

of Plniog
DveloDment Seryis Cf, let
lll.l Nonh Rmcho Drire- 3'd F'lr
tls Veg. Ne!d 89106
PFSRT
Departffit
FIFSTTIS MIL
U.S, Poslaoe
REEEfVD
JUL
Ofcial Notice of Public Hearing
f,
201{;
City of Las Veqas

Dept. of Ptanning
N
f\
FTID-
Las Vegar, NV
PemitN.1630
(ity
Hall
lf you uish to frle your proest or suPpon on lhis reqmsl, ceck the
rpprcpriate box below and tDm is card in m nvelopf wilh lstage to lhe
Depafimnt of Plnning at the ildress isd abo\t, fu tbis side ol'this card to
(702) 464-7.+99. If ycu uould lik lo contacl your Clurcil Replesnllive,
ples call (?02) 229#-5.
'r2s19ro2o2r
t:TMP{47s
DISI-ION TREVOR A MICILL.

s690 wlTTlG
r_As vGAs Nv 89149-13S2
[].:xf"x fft,-n,,
= Please use available blaok spacFon card for your co)nmefls.

I
TMP-647eO [PRJ-6470,|1
ts
4
Planning Commission Meetin o1'l11217016
:T
f,L='Ci-iF
J t : 4'
,Jt,
4,lf il l,t, rltf ,, l, l,, lil, f ,,
ll,,l,i,tll,fhl,tllf ,ll,l
r
=
ssP
City of Las Vcgas
PRSRT
Development Scrviccs Cenler
333 North Rancho l)rive. 3'd Floor
Las Vegrs. Nevrtla 89106
FIRST CLASS MAIL
U.S. Poslage
PA ID
Las Vegas, NV
Permit No. 1630

REEEruED
jul
\
City Hall
11
2016
City of Las Vegas

Dept. of Planning
il
City Holl
Llid)lp
s!&h&
If' you wish to l'ilc your protest or
support on this request, check thc

rppropriate box bclorv and relurn this card in an cnvelope with poslage to thc
Departnrent ol Planning at the addrcss listed above. lax this side of this card to
OA2) 464-7499. ll' you would like to contact your Council Represenlalive.
please call (7 0?) 229 -6405.
l-I
I
rsuPPoRr fZ
roPPosE
this
this Request
Rcqucsr l
.J
r251g4ororg
case: TMP'64790
GRAVES WILLIAM B & MICHELLE C

7365 N JENSEN ST
LAS VEGAS NV 89149-.I916
TMP-64790 [PRJ-64704]
7l\ZDA
i ? :i:,';r'r:
*.s
"f t,llf
'll't'lf f l'll',llf l'llll'll'll'l'fllll"ll'l'f
lf
'l'lf
SS?
City ol Las Vegas

l)e panment of Planning
PRSRT
FIRST CLASS MAIL
Dcvclopment Services Ccnter

U.S. Poslage
PAID
Las Vegas, NV
Permit No. 1630

RECIVED
jul
\
ut,
City Hall
11 2016
Clty of Las Vegas

Dept. of Planning
A
N
6ty Holl
t! l*
sl&hs
It' you wish to file yor"rr protest or support or this request, check thc
appropriatc box bclow and rcturn this card in an cnvclope with postage to thc
Dcpanment ol Planning at the address listed abovc. tax this sitle of this card to
(702\ 464-7499. If you would like to contact your Council Representative.
plcasc call (7 02J 229 -6405.
12sl84rooo2
I OPPOSE
SUPPORT
this Request
this Rcqucst
Please use available blank space on
case: TMP-64790
SCOTT CAMILLE & BRNDON

7369 SILENT WATEFI WAY
LAS VEGAS NV 89,I49
your comrnents
TMP-64790 [PRJ-64704]
1/l2l2$l6
.E? rr;r;;;r'.r J
'j.
lf
l'lJl'lllf
','l'tlllr'llll'l'l"1''" tn'il|ilI"ilrlf
SSP
City ol Las Vegas

I)cpanmcnt ol' Planninp
l)evelopmenr Scrvices Cenlcr
331 Nonh Rancho Drivc. 3d Floor
PRSRT
FIESTCLASS MAIL
U.S. Postage
PAID
Las Vegas, NV
Permit No. 1630
Las Vcgas. Ncr,acla 89106
Oflicial Notice of Public Hearing
REEEffD
JUL
11
2016
City of l-as Vegas

Dept. of Planning
ll'you wish to lile your protcst or supporl on this rcque.st. check the
uppropriate box below and rettrrn this card in an cnvelope lvith postage lo thc
Dcparlmenl ol Planning al the addrcss listed atrovc, fax this side of this card to
(102) 464-7499. If you would like to contat your Council Rcprcsentalive.
plcasc call {702)229-6405.
'
12s19102016
I SUPPORT
this Rcqucst
case: TMP'il790
HOOKE ROBERT D & DONNA J

9675 ELKHORN RD
LASVEGAS NV 89149-1911
I OPPOSE
this Request
Please use available blank space on card for your cornments
TMP-64790 [PRJ-64704]
1ll2l20l6
E7 irf;,:f'ti= t t. -'
ttltl t l,
!il,l,
l, ll 1,, I 1,, l'
il l t| il,,il ",1,1 lll l, llf '
SS?
City of Las Vegas

Depanmenl of Planning
PRSRT
FIRSTCLASS MAIL
U.S. Postage

North Rancho Drive. 3'd Fl<xrr
PA ID
-133
Las Vegas, NV
Permit No. 1630
'

RECEIVED
JUL
City Hall
tw15
A
it
Cry
H!ll
t@s
stlb9
ll' you wish to' lle your
11
2016
City of Las Vegas

Dept. of Planning
,{p
prolcsl or .suppon on this request. chcck thc
appropriate box belorv and rcturn this card in an envelope with postage to thc
Departnrent of Planning at the addrcss li.stcd above. fax this side of this card to
(102) 46+-7499. lf you would likc lo contact your Council Represcntative.
please call (1 02) 229 -6405.
t SUPPORT
this Request
r2s1g4iooo6
case: TMPgTgo
MINOSKI RICKY J & MARY E

7310 SILNT WATER WAY
I OPPOSE
this Request
Please use available blank space on card for your coulrents
TMP-647e0 [PRJ-64704]
Planning Commission Meeting of 7/12/2016
i.i''.;t t
*i.
llf'll'f'lllfll'll"'ll'llllllll'll'tll'llf''llln'l'"'ll
55?
City ol'Los Vegas
PRSRT
FIHST CLASS MAIL
U.S. Postage
l)epartnrenl ol Planning
l)cvelopment Services Centcr
333 Norrh Rancho Drive.3 Floor
PAIO
Las Vegas, NV
Permit No. 1630
This area is zoned RNP Residentiat NeBhborhood Preservation. The current zoning regulations allow for
total of 10 homes on
5 acres, which all of us in this area have
oppose 17 residential lots being developed on 5
whi
rs
honored. Dana and

direct vi
tion of the current RNP
RECEIVED
zonrng.
\
J
/\
il lf't
Reid Smith strongly
wislr to lle- Ycur -Prot*.!l rlr-'\uPFon g- ris- request' check-the-
th pQstage l() thc

appropriate box bclow n<i ren r tt3 ffitl' iir- cnvolitwi
of this card to
side
this
fax
above.
listed
thc
addrcss
at
Represenlativc'
your Council
0A 4g-1499. If You woul d like to conlact
pleasc call (102) 229 -6405.
I OPPOSE
this Request
I SUPPORT
this Rcquest
on card for Your colrments
rMP-647e0 [PRJ-64704]
Planning Comnrission Meeting
J.
oT I I
-:e--l
JUL
---
2016
City of Las Veoas

.--ephorffig-_-
1251 84.t 000s
Cse: TMP-64790

SMITH REID S & DANA L CO-TBS
LAS VEGAS NV 89149
lT70l6
a-rjf:;t:i"jj5
J: t rs
Itll,lltllll,,llllltltll'tt "lit trllll llf , l,'llil,llf ll'l'llll
SSP
Jity of
L.rrs
PRSRT
Vegas
FIESTCISSMAIL
)epanrncnt ol Planning
)evelopmcnt Scn'ices Center
ll3 North Rancho Drivc. 3'd Floor
-as Vcgas. Ncvuda 89106
U.S, Posloe
PAID-
Las Vegas, NV
Permil No. 1630

Oflcial Notice of Public Hearing
RCV
JUr_ tr
2016
C'ily of l-as Veoas
Cty Hll
66
Dept. of ptanriing
.tt5
.f you wish to lrle your protes( or
support
on this requcst, check
the
rppropriate hox trulow and return this card in an envelope with nstage to the
)epurtment of Planning at the addrcss listed ahove. l'ax this side of this card to
'.7A2, 46+7499. If you would like to contact your Council Represcntative,
.125t8410003
rleaso call Q A 229-6405.

a
l*f#
Please use
","
rMP-64790 [PRJ-64704]
Pf an n i n
oqnill'-o
Hl"','#"t:t
your
co m men r s.
M egtin g_of 7 I t_U]l_!!
Applcation Information
TlMp-64790
Caso: TMP64790
ZACHARY FAMILY TFUST

ZACHABY KEETON DALE & JULIE TBS
LAS VEGAS NV 89119
. TENTATM MAP RELATED TO GPA-64786,
zoN-64787, \ryVR-64788, AND WVR-64789 - ELKHORN &

GRAND CANYON . PUBLIC HEARING . APPLICANT/
OIVNER: KULKA LAND, LLC - For possible action on a request
for a Tentative Map FOR A 17-LOT SINCLE-FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL SUBDMSION on 5.0 acres at the northwest corner
of Elkhorn Road and Grand Canyon Drive (APN 125-18-403-003),
R-E (Residence Estates ) Zone IPROPOSED: R-l (Single Family
>& f,,
r---
i!
L*
Residential)1, (Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-64704].
The proposed project may not penain to the entire highlightcd

project site.
7rf;

Planning Commission
July 12,2016
6:00 P.M.
495 South Main Street, 2d Floor
Meeting:
Date:
Time:
L,ocation:
Nevada 89101
Las
nl all
thcruol'si(h
tlBr ublic hwin tms ny
lf,
,\(fri$s
bc
dsql
linl
Nor
hy lhL lrlannilg Conrmssim
1r
^cton
dis[ssi(hollltrkx. itrllnilrinlirnnlhrn.i-ludinSthcfulliaftnorl.FL'escidl
qpG5 pprral of
ti9106. l:inal
on
cq@s]:
Ccrurl
I'lil
^ctim
qmy.
ncodm(rts d
$n(ilnccd
ill tf,'dclcmifrrl
at tbc
ud mmcnr Hcivr
m stenda Ns
lcr th
ro hc
rclLrt(, nlinx uilil lltr fhc ung: hoscrc lhc ffnftnl{ rc mdu at"ilablc lo hc mcmtLh 0l thc locmin, bfrly for licirconsd{rli(u trior b t mtid!.
>s7
PRSRT
)ity of'Las Vcgas
FIRST C{,ASS
)panmcnt of Planning
PAID
t33 Nonh Rancho Drive. 3'd Floor
Las Veg, NV
PermilNo. 1630
-as Vcgas. Ncvada 89106
'
I'IL
U.S. Postaga
)etclopmcnt Serviccs Ccntcr

Offcial Notice of Public Hearing
RECV
\
tt,
Jtit
cry Hall
tr
2016
Olty of l-as Veoas
Dept. of ptanriing
you wish to flc your prolest or support on this requesl. chcck thc
rppropriatc box below and return this crrd in an ei,rvclogr with Posmgc to thc
)epunment of Planning at the adrlrtss listed abovg fax this side of this curd to
'j02) 4(A-1499. lf you would likc to contact your Council Represcntative.
:lcasc cull (7 02) 229 -6405.
if
1251g4b300g
I OPPOSE
ths Requast
I SUPPORT
this Request
rMP-64790 [PRJ-64704]
cas: TMP64790
POECHMANN FAMILY LIVING TRUST

POECHMANN DAVID C & KERRV A TRS
9695 SOLAR AVE
rs VEGAS NV 89149-1 907
7llU2Ol6
Application Information
.TMP.64790
- TENTATIVE MAP RELATED TO GP4.64786,

zoN-64787, 1ryVR-64788, AND WVR-64789 - ELKHORN &
GRAND CANYON . PUBLIC HEARING . APPLICANT/
rct
li
OWNER: KULKA LAND, LLC - For ossible ction on a request

for a Tentative Map' FOR A I7-LOT SINGLE-FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION on 5.0 acres at the northwest corner
of Elkhorn Road and Grand Canyon Drive (APN 125-18-403-003),

R-E (Re.sidence Estates
) Zone IPROPOSED: R-l (Single
Family
l
The proxrscd projcct may not pcnlin to the entire highlightcd

project sitc.

Meeting:
Date:
July 12,2016
Time:
:00 P.M.
Location:

495 South Main Street, 2'd Floor
Planning Commission
Las
rnd all
ffryrru
l)cpnmrnt t
(rtlrr phlic h!in8 i[rs my bc
disssior ol'c ite. It
rcll{ed onliru rntll afur c rong: hosrtr. [ smocnL\
theolrith
1uc{l {r m} .
o (crunl [{m ,\ntrlmcs
frton
may
thc
*ill
ol
mill: uilablc
to
:19-6.01 OTY 7-l.l)or

mcmbcn of r gottmiog tnly
rriff
Nolc
to E m(aling,
bc
tirt f$rnls
Nevada 89101
or
tc
flot hc
S5?
PRSRT
lity'of Las Vcgas
FIRSTCISS iIAIL
)cparrment of Planning
)cvelopmcnt Services Ccncr
31 Nonh Rancho Drive. 3'c Floor
.as Vcgas. Nevada 8910
U.S. Postage
PA ID
Las Vegao, NV
Permit No. 1630
Return Service Requted

Oflicial Notice of Puhlic Hearing
T
RECIVED
at
City Xall
JUL
t
itv ll[
Lt' lp
rtrst
t' you. wish Io file your protc.(t or supp(lrl on this rcquest. check thc
rppropriate box hctow and rcturn this card in an cnvclopc with postage to the
"'6
20t6
flr':'.ix":ffi
at thc addru$s listcd uhovc. thx this sidc of this crd to

702'' 464-7499. tf you would like to contact your Council Representative,
lcasc cill (702) 229-6405.
icpartr.nt of Phrnning
l-l
I
tsuppoRr l7l
topposE
this
this Request
Requcst I f\l
l2slglrzazT
cas: TMP4790
^/ESTHOFF JAMES J E KOEINNE S

7O FERN MAOOW ST
LAS VEGAS NV 89149
)tease use availble blank space on card for your comments-
rMP.647eo [PRl-647041
)lanning Commission Meeting ar 7l1212016
Application Information
*ir
TMP-64790 . TENTATIYE MAP RELATED TO GPA-64786,

7,ON-64787, \ryVR-6478E, AND WVR-64789 - ELKHORN &
GRAND CANYON . PUBLIC. HEARING . APPLICANT/
OWNER: KULKA LAND, LLC - For possible action on a request
for a Tentative Mp FOR A l7-LOT SINCLE-FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION on 5.0 mes at the norlhwest corner
of Elkhorn Rca-bnd Gacl' Cayon Dri ve (APN- I 25-.1 8-493-003),
R-E (Residence Estatss ) Zone TPROPOSED: R-l (Sinlle Farnily
IG
Residential)1, (Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-64704].
The proposcd projcct may not pcrtain to the entire highlightccl

projcct sitc.
%.*
Public Hearing lnformation

Meeting: Planning Comnrission
Date:
July 12,2016
6:00 P.M,
Time: ..
Location City Council Chambers
'
495 South Main Steet,2d Floor
/vt
0f
Ncvada 89101
Las
(v
rc {nt (*rj1 (r (rcrpGsx
ud
8ov!fiin8 txy
l'or
Lir cotc(n)o priot lo lhc
rulit.
(rtjcci(n th(reto0r
l
Rczonings
will
hc
dcmi{
lfrcr
r rilh xtN sill
nol
.
tE
S5?
REClVD
Ciry f Las vegas
3:[n:i!Jiil"n*,
PRSRT
uul trl2016
FIHST CLASS MAIL
333 Norrh Rancho Drive. 3d Floor

Las vegas. Nevada
89106
Gity Of Las Vegas

DePt. of Planning
AtsotutttTjrroT
to
et
?t9b
U.S. Postage
PAID
-Las Vegas, NV
Permil No. 1630
{oMi t:f(lxrMUNJ
lntF Ar Lcr5; oilty

r
If you wish to file your protest or
suppon on this requesr, check the

appropriate box bclow and retum this card in an envelope with postge to thc
Department of Planning at the address listcd above, fax rhis sidc ofthis card to
(102) 464-7499. ll' you would like to contact yc.rur Council Representative,
please call (7 02) 229-6405.
X l,'*'[:,",:i fifi
'r2s1g41ooro
case: TMP-&790
RIPPEY KENT & MARY E

LAS VEGAS NV 89149
i,?.'-",',
Please use.available bank space on card for your comments.
rMP-647e0 [PRJ-64704]
Planning Cornmission Me.et$g of,7.,/,.]!l?9.1,._
t:
.i
*,.
,i.
ul,,{,t,ltl,fl, riillrll, lltf,l,, lllltlt lI lt l,llllll,t,,,,l
5s(
City of Las Vegas

Depcnmcnl of Planning
f)cvclopnrcnt Services Ccner
333 North Rancho Drive.3d Floor
PRSBT
FIRSTCLASS MAIL
U.S. Postage
PAID
Las Vegas, NV
Permil No. 1630
Las Vegas, Ncvada 89106

OfficialNotice of Public Hearing
RECEIV
JUL 1 T
2016
-l
\
^Ni.l
City of t-as Vegas

Dept. of Planning
Cty
Ltim Mp
49]i &h tr
If
you wish to fle your protest or suppon on ths rcqucst, check the
appropriate box below and retum this card in an envelope with postage-to the
Department oi Planning al the address listed above. t'ax this si<le of this ard to
(702\ 464-7499. If you would like lo contact your Council Rcpresentative,
please cal I (7 02) 229 -6405.
I SUPPORT
this Request
251 951
022
Case: TMP-6,4790
RAO GOPAL
LEE SUSIE
7111 NARROW PEAKST
I OPPOSE
this Rcquest
TMP-47e0 [PRJ-647041
Plannins Commission Meeins of 7/121216
"
i;=-T ii,;r{Fl. l:+S
,, I, rf
,,,f
rf ,,
f
lll,t
lf
lf r
lltlllf \t,ttl l' ililllll,,

a
r,, r, I
I
55?

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
GPA-64884 - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT - PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT/OWNER: 7470, LLC - For possible action on a request for a General Plan
Amendment FROM: R (RURAL DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) TO: GC (GENERAL
COMMERCIAL) on 5.19 acres at the northeast corner of Deer Springs Way and Hualapai Way
(APN 125-19-202-006), Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-64757]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
C.C.: 9/21/2016
18
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends DENIAL
2. Conditions and Staff Report - GPA-64884, ZON-64885, VAR-64887 and SDR-64886 [PRJ64757]
3. Supporting Documentation - GPA-64884, ZON-64885, VAR-64887 and SDR-64886 [PRJ64757]
4. Photo(s) - GPA-64884, ZON-64885, VAR-64887 and SDR-64886 [PRJ-64757]
5. Justification Letter - GPA-64884, ZON-64885, VAR-64887 and SDR-64886 [PRJ-64757]
6. Protest Email/Letter - GPA-64884, ZON-64885, VAR-64887 and SDR-64886 [PRJ-64757]
and Protest Postcards - GPA-64884, ZON-64885, and VAR-64887 [PRJ-64757]
GPA-64884, ZON-64885, VAR-64887 and SDR-64886 [PRJ-64757]

DEPARTMENT:
PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: 7470, LLC
CASE
NUMBER
GPA-64884
ZON-64885
VAR-64887
SDR-64886
RECOMMENDATION
conditions:
conditions:
REQUIRED FOR
APPROVAL
GPA-64885
GPA-64884
ZON-64885
GPA-64885
ZON-64885
VAR-64887
** NOTIFICATION **
42
NOTICES MAILED
100 - GPA-64884, ZON-64885 and VAR-64887

100 - SDR-64886
APPROVALS
0 - GPA-64884, ZON-64885 and VAR-64887

0 - SDR-64886
PROTESTS
18 - GPA-64884
17 - ZON-64885 and VAR-64887
18 - SDR-64886
NE

Conditions Page One
** CONDITIONS **
VAR-64887 CONDITIONS
Planning
1.
Approval of General Plan Amendment (GPA-64884) and Rezoning (ZON-64885);

approval of and conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Site Development Plan
Review (SDR-64886) shall be required, if approved.
2.
3.
Safety.
4.
5.
Planning
1.
Approval of General Plan Amendment (GPA-64884) and Rezoning (ZON-64885); and

Approval of and conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Variance (VAR-64887)
shall be required, if approved.
2.
NE

Conditions Page Two
3.
All development shall be in conformance with the site plans date stamped July 27, 2016;
the landscape plan date stamped July 21, 2016; and building elevations date stamped June
1, 2016 and July 18, 2016, except as amended by conditions herein.
4.
A Waiver from Title 19.08 is hereby approved, to allow the car wash bay to face the public
right-of-way where such is not allowed.
5.
A Waiver from Title 19.08 is hereby approved, to allow a drive-through stacking lane for
five vehicles where a stacking lane that accommodates six vehicles is required.
6.
The building footprint for the 2,061 square-foot Restaurant with Drive Through shall be
reconfigured to allow for a minimum of a five vehicle stacking lane.
7.
A Waiver from Title 19.08 is hereby approved, to allow a five-foot landscape buffer along
a portion of the east property line where eight feet is required.
8.
A Waiver from Title 19.08 is hereby approved, to not orient the buildings to the corner and
street fronts where such is required.
9.
An Exception from Title 19.08 is hereby approved, to allow seven parking lot landscape
islands where ten parking lot landscape islands are required; and to allow 27 parking lot
trees within the landscape islands and at the end of each row of parking spaces where 32
parking lot trees are required.
10.
The Trash Enclosure and Mechanical Equipment shall be screened in accordance with Title
19.08.040(E)(4).
11.
Safety.
12.
13.

of any traffic control device. The technical landscape plan shall include the following
changes from the conceptual landscape plan:
a.
Provide landscape islands with trees and shrubs in accordance with Title 19.08.
NE

14.
15.
A Comprehensive Construction Staging Plan shall be submitted to the Department of

Planning for review and approval prior to the issuance of any building permits. The
Construction Staging Plan shall include the following information: Design and location of
construction trailer(s); design and location of construction fencing; all proposed temporary
construction signage; location of materials staging area; and the location and design of
parking for all construction workers.
16.
17.
18.
Public Works
19.
Dedicate 50 feet for Hualapai Way and 40 feet for Deer Springs Way adjacent to this site
prior to the issuance of off-site permits. Additionally, dedicate a 35-foot radius with a
Traffic Signal Chord Easement at the northeast corner or Hualapai Way and Deer Springs
Way. Also dedicate additional right-of way per Standard Drawing #201.1 on Hualapai
Way and Deer Springs Way and a bus turnout per Standard Drawing #234.1 on Hualapai
Way prior to the issuance of off-site permits.
20.
right-of-way.
21.
Construct all half-street improvements on Hualapai Way and Deer Springs Way per current
City Standards including traffic signal underground infrastructure at the northeast corner of
Hualapai Way and Deer Springs Way adjacent to this site concurrent with development of
this site. All existing off-site improvements damaged or removed by this development
shall be restored at its original location and to its original width concurrent with
development of this site.
22.
Unless otherwise allowed by the City Engineer, construct sidewalk on at least one side of
all access drives connecting this site to the adjacent public streets concurrent with
development of this site. The connecting sidewalk shall extend from the sidewalk on the
public street to the first intersection of the on-site roadway network and shall be terminated
on-site with a handicap ramp.
NE

23.
Meet with the Fire Protection Engineering Section of the Department of Fire Services to
discuss fire requirements for the proposed use of this facility.
24.
All private improvements and landscaping installed with this project shall be situated and
25.
Submit an Encroachment Agreement to the City of Las Vegas for all landscaping and
private improvements in the Hualapai Way and Deer Springs Way public rights-of way
adjacent to this site. The applicant must carry an insurance policy for the term of the
Encroachment Agreement and add the City of Las Vegas as an additionally insured entity
on this insurance policy. If requested by the City, the applicant shall remove property
encroaching in the public right-of-way at the applicant's expense pursuant to the terms of
the City's Encroachment Agreement. The installation and maintenance of all private
improvements in the public right of way shall be the responsibility of the applicant and any
successors in interest to the property and assigns pursuant to the terms of the Encroachment
Agreement. Coordinate all requirements for the Encroachment Agreement with the Land
Development Section of the Department of Building and Safety (229-4836).
26.
Works prior to the issuance of any building or grading permits, submittal of any
construction drawings or the recordation of a Map subdividing this site, whichever may
occur first. Comply with the recommendations of the approved Traffic Impact Analysis
prior to occupancy of the site. The Traffic Impact Analysis shall also include a section
addressing Standard Drawings #234.1 #234.2 and #234.3 to determine additional right-ofway requirements for bus turnouts adjacent to this site, if any; dedicate all areas
recommended by the approved Traffic Impact Analysis. All additional rights of way
required by Standard Drawing #201.1 for exclusive right turn lanes and dual left turn lanes
shall be dedicated prior to or concurrent with the commencement of on site development
activities unless specifically noted as not required in the approved Traffic Impact Analysis.
Phased compliance will be allowed if recommended by the approved Traffic Impact
Analysis. No recommendation of the approved Traffic Impact Analysis, nor compliance
therewith, shall be deemed to modify or eliminate any condition of approval imposed by
the Planning Commission or the City Council on the development of this site.
27.
Department of Public Works prior to the issuance of any building or grading permits or
submittal of any construction drawings, whichever may occur first. Provide and improve
all drainage ways recommended in the approved drainage plan/study. The developer of
this site shall be responsible to construct such neighborhood or local drainage facility
improvements as are recommended by the City of Las Vegas Neighborhood Drainage
Studies and approved Drainage Plan/Study concurrent with development of this site
NE

** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant has proposed a commercial development consisting of a Convenience Store with
Fuel Pumps and a Canopy; a General Retail Store; a Full Service Car Wash Facility; a Coffee
Shop; a Restaurant with Drive-Through; and a 700-unit Mini-Storage Facility on 5.19 acres at the
northeast corner of Deer Springs Way and Hualapai Way.
ISSUES
A General Plan Amendment is required to amend the subject site from R (Rural Density
Residential) to GC (General Commercial) Land Use Designation to support the requested
zoning district C-2 (General Commercial).
Rezoning the subject site from R-E (Residence Estates) to C-2 (General Commercial) is
required to allow the proposed commercial development and proposed land uses.
The initial request was for a Residential Adjacency Setback Variance for both the northern and
eastern property lines. The applicant has revised the site plan and now only requires a Variance
for the Residential Adjacency Setback along the northern property line.
Waivers are required to allow the car wash bay to face the public right-of-way, to allow a
reduced vehicle stacking lane in the drive-through, and to not orient the proposed buildings to
the corner and street fronts.
A Waiver to allow a reduced landscape buffer along the eastern perimeter is no longer
required, as the applicant has revised the site plan to provide the required eight-foot landscape
buffer.
ANALYSIS
The subject site is currently an undeveloped 5.19 acre parcel located at the northeast corner of
Deer Springs Way and Hualapai Way. Currently the subject site has a General Plan designation of
R (Rural Density Residential), and is zoned R-E (Residence Estates). Rural Density Residential
allows for 3.59 dwelling units per acre. Additionally, this parcel is bordered by existing detached,
single family residences [R-1 (Single Family Residential)] to the north, and an undeveloped parcel
to the east that is currently designated RL [(Residential Low) Rural Neighborhood Preservation I]
in Clark County. Essentially, the subject site is directly adjacent to existing and planned low
density single family residences.
The applicant is requesting a General Plan Amendment from R (Rural Density Residential) to GC
(General Commercial), one the most intense commercial designations available. In addition, the
NE

applicant has also requested to rezone the subject site from R-E (Residence Estates) to C-2
(General Commercial), also a very intense commercial zoning district. For example, an Auto Sales
Showroom; a Building & Landscape Material/Lumber Yard; Building Maintenance Service and
Sales; Hotel, Motel or Hotel Suites; and a Towing Service (with no storage), are all permitted uses
within the C-2 (General Commercial) zoning district. These types of land uses are too intense and
inappropriate to be directly adjacent to single family residences.
Initially, the applicant had proposed a Mini-Storage Facility that did not meet Residential
Adjacency Setback requirements for both the east and north property lines and required a Variance
application. After meeting with the area residents during a scheduled neighborhood meeting on
June 20, 2016, the applicant requested an abeyance until the August 9, 2016 Planning Commission
meeting to allow for more time to analyze the subject site and re-submit new exhibits to the
Planning Department for consideration. Revised plans were submitted and the first floor of the
proposed Mini-Storage Facility is now set back 44 feet from the east property line where 20 feet is
required for the rear setback. The tower feature was reduced in height from its original design to
28 feet, and is now setback 83 feet where 63 feet is required, meeting the Residential Adjacency
Standards along the eastern property line. However, along the north property line, the applicant
revised the building elevation to provide a step in the elevation and graduate to the second level.
The second story has a height of 20 feet, requiring a 60-foot setback. The applicant has provided a
56-foot set back; four feet shy of the required 60 feet to meet Residential Adjacency Standards.
This is especially crucial considering the north property line abuts existing single family homes.
Residential Adjacency Standards were developed to protect single family residences from being
intruded upon by commercial development. In this instance, the existing single family homes to
the north will have a two-story Mini-Storage Facility adjacent to their rear yards. The applicant has
not met the Residential Adjacency Standards for the north property line; therefore, staff
recommends denial of this Variance application.
The overall site plan consists of an 84,800 square-foot Mini-Storage Facility with 700 units; a
3,668 square-foot Convenience Store with Fuel Pumps, Canopy, and a Car Wash; a 2,220 squarefoot Restaurant with Drive Through; 1,223 square feet of General Retail space; and another 2,061
square-foot Restaurant with Drive Through. None of the proposed structures were positioned to
orient to the corner and the street fronts as required by Title 19.08, and a Waiver has been
requested for this. A Waiver has also been requested to allow for a reduced stacking lane
associated with the 2,220 square-foot Restaurant with Drive through. Title 19 requires stacking for
six vehicles, and the applicant has only provided stacking for five. Staff questions the validity of
the stacking lane depicted on the site plan for the 2,061 square-foot Restaurant with Drive
Through. The footprint of the building depicts the typical pop-out for the Drive Through window
on the northern side of the building, which would only allow for a three-vehicle stacking lane. A
Condition of Approval has been added to ensure sufficient vehicle stacking is provided if
approved. Staff is concerned reduced vehicle stacking lanes associated with the Restaurant Drive
Throughs will create circulation problems within the parking lot itself and is recommending denial
of the Waiver request. A Waiver has also been requested to allow for the Car Wash tunnel to face
NE

the public right-of-way where such is not allowed. Since the proposed site plan could have been
reconfigured to mitigate the car wash tunnel view from the public right-of-way, staff is
recommending denial of this request as well.
The applicant has requested an Exception for the required parking lot landscape islands and trees.
Title 19 requires a landscape island with tree for every six uncovered parking spaces. The
proposed site plan depicts six extra parking stalls; the site could have been reconfigured to allow
for the required parking lot landscape islands and trees while still meeting the minimum parking
requirements set forth by Title 19.12. For this reason, staff is recommending denial of the
Exception request.
The signage depicted on the site, landscape, and elevation plans are not part of this review and are
reviewed separately when a building permit application is submitted for a sign.
Staff finds the proposed General Plan Amendment and associated Rezoning, Variance, and Site
Development Plan Review applications to be incompatible with the existing single family
residential homes and zoning districts in the area, and the land uses permitted in the proposed C-2
(General Commercial) zoning district to be inappropriate and too intense to be adjacent to single
family residences. In addition, the applicant is proposing to overdevelop the subject site as
evidenced by the need for a Residential Adjacency Standard Variance, Waivers of the
development standards, and Exceptions of the parking lot island and tree requirements. For these
reasons, staff recommends denial of all of the requested applications. If approved, the proposed
commercial development would be able to be constructed as submitted.
1.
The density and intensity of the proposed General Plan Amendment is compatible with
the existing adjacent land use designations,
The intensity of the proposed GC (General Commercial) General Plan designation is not
compatible with the adjacent existing R (Rural) General Plan designated single family
residences to the north, or the R-E [Rural Estates Residential (2 Units per Acre)] zoned
property within Clark Countys jurisdiction to the east.
2.
The C-2 (General Commercial) zoning district supported by the GC (General Commercial)
Land Use Designation permits uses such as an Auto Sales Showroom; Building &
NE

Landscape Material/Lumber Yards; Cold Storage Plants; Emergency Ambulance Services,

Ground; a Hotel, and a Motel or Hotel Suites. Staff finds the uses permitted in the C-2
(General Commercial) zoning district to be too intense and inappropriate to be adjacent to
single family residences.
3.

Amendment; and
Deer Springs Way is a Major Collector with Hualapai Way being a Primary Arterial as
defined by the Master Plan of Streets and Highways. Both would be adequate to
accommodate the uses and densities permitted within the GC (General Commercial) Land
Use Designation.
4.
The proposed amendment conforms to other applicable adopted plans and policies that
include approved neighborhood plans.
Map Two of the Centennial Hills Sector Concept Land Use Map has the intersection of
Deer Springs Way and Hualapai Way designated as part of the Rural Preservation area.
Amending the General Plan to GC (General Commercial) would not conform to the
Centennial Hills Sector Plan.
1.

If approved, the proposed C-2 (General Commercial) zoning district would conform to the
requested GC (General Commercial) General Plan Designation; however, staff is
recommending denial as the requested zoning district does not conform to the Centennial
Hills Sector Plan or the surrounding residential land uses.
2.
Staff finds the proposed uses, in addition to uses currently permitted in the C-2 (General
Commercial) zoning district by Title 19.12 to be too intense and inappropriate to be adjacent
to single family residences.
3.
NE

In addition to the neighbors expressing their desire for the subject site to be developed into
single family residential lots during the neighborhood meeting, building permits for housing
have increased 11.4% from November 2014 to November 2015 Citywide. As the local
economic conditions continue to improve, the City is seeing an increased demand for new
residential construction. This indicates a demand for additional housing stock, not
commercial space.
4.
Deer Springs Way is a Major Collector with Hualapai Way being a Primary Arterial as
defined by the Master Plan of Streets and Highways. Both would be adequate to
accommodate the land uses permitted within the C-2 (General Commercial) zoning district.
FINDINGS (VAR-64887)
In accordance with the provisions of Title 19.16.140(B), Planning Commission and City Council,
in considering the merits of a Variance request, shall not grant a Variance in order to:
1.
2.
3.
Permit a use in a zoning district in which the use is not allowed;

Vary any minimum spacing requirement between uses;
Relieve a hardship which is solely personal, self-created or financial in nature.
Additionally, Title 19.16.140(L) states:

Where by reason of exceptional narrowness, shallowness, or shape of a specific piece of
property at the time of enactment of the regulation, or by reason of exceptional topographic
conditions or other extraordinary and exceptional situation or condition of the piece of
property, the strict application of any zoning regulation would result in peculiar and
exceptional practical difficulties to, or exceptional and undue hardships upon, the owner of
the property, a variance from that strict application may be granted so as to relieve the
difficulties or hardship, if the relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good, without substantial impairment of affected natural resources and without
substantially impairing the intent and purpose of any ordinance or resolution.
No evidence of a unique or extraordinary circumstance has been presented, in that the applicant
has created a self-imposed hardship by overdeveloping the subject site. Alternative site design
would allow conformance to the Title 19 requirements for Residential Adjacency. In view of the
absence of any hardships imposed by the sites physical characteristics, it is concluded that the
applicants hardship is preferential in nature, and it is thereby outside the realm of NRS Chapter
278 for granting of Variances. Staff recommends denial of this application.
NE

In order to approve a Site Development Plan Review application, per Title 19.16.100(E) the Planning
Commission and/or City Council must affirm the following:
1.
The proposed development is compatible with adjacent development and development

in the area;
As demonstrated by the need for a General Plan Amendment, a Rezoning, a Variance from
Residential Adjacency Standards, and multiple development Waivers, the proposed
development is too intense and incompatible with the existing surrounding residential uses in
the area.
2.
The proposed development does not conform to the minimum development standards set
forth by Title 19. The applicant is proposing to overdevelop the subject site, evidenced by
the need for a Residential Adjacency Setback Variance, and multiple Waivers.
3.

The primary access to the subject site is Hualapai Way, a Primary Arterial and Deer Springs
Way, a Major Collector as designated by the Master Plan of Streets and Highways. Both
access points would serve as adequate to meet the traffic needs of the proposed development.
4.
The building materials proposed consist of split face CMU, decorative molding, and stone
veneer accents. The proposed landscape materials include the Fruitless Olive tree,
Mediterranean Palm trees, and Lantana shrubs, all of which are appropriate for a desert
climate and the City.
5.

features are not unsightly, undesirable, or obnoxious in appearance; create an orderly
and aesthetically pleasing environment; and are harmonious and compatible with
The building elevations demonstrate structures with varied rooflines and building facades
and would not be unsightly, but the necessity of a Residential Adjacency Setback Variance is
evidence that the proposed structures would be intrusive to the existing adjacent residential
NE

neighborhood and would not create an aesthetically pleasing environment for the existing
neighbors. The proposed commercial development would not be harmonious or compatible
with the existing residential development in the area.
6.
general welfare.
Development of the site is subject to all applicable codes, permitting and inspections,
thereby securing the public health, safety and general welfare.
Code Enforcement processed a complaint (#117692) for an abandoned
07/30/12
political sign on the east side of Hualapai Way, north of Deer Springs Way.
The case remains open.
Code Enforcement processed a complaint (#130034) for a food truck on the
06/13/13
corner of Deer Springs Way and Hualapai Way. The case was resolved on
06/13/13.
Code Enforcement processed a complaint (#130034) for a food truck parking
on the County side of the intersection of Deer Springs Way and Hualapai
06/18/13
Way. Complainant wants to make sure the food truck remains within the
County limits. The case was resolved on 08/12/13.

The City Council approved a Petition to Annex (ANX-61543) 5.39 acres on
01/20/16
the northeast corner of Deer Springs Way and Hualapai Way.
07/12/16

07/26/12

There are no relative building permits or business licenses for the subject site.
NE

05/24/16
for a General Plan Amendment, Rezoning, Variance, and Site Development
Plan Review were discussed.
Meeting Start Time:
Meeting End Time:
6:30 p.m.
7:30 p.m.
Attendance: 5 Representatives for the Applicant

1 Representative from the Planning Department
1 Representative from Mayor Pro Tem Ross Office
Approximately 32 Members of the public (neighbors).
06/20/16
Concerns:
The neighbors do not want any kind of commercial located on that
particular lot. The neighbors feel the other commercial projects in the
area provide them with enough services.
The neighbors are concerned with having commercial uses within
close proximity of their homes and yards, creating noise problems.
The neighbors whose property are adjacent to the proposed project do
not want commercial uses in their backyard. They are concerned with
losing their privacy and people jumping walls, etc.
The neighbors are also concerned with their property values
plummeting after the project is built. No one wants a mini-storage
facility and a convenience store/gas station in their backyard, and they
will lose value and not be able to sell their homes for what they paid.
Many expressed how they have spent their life savings to be able to
live in the rural area and want to spend their remaining (retirement)
years there.
The majority of the neighbors expressed the sentiment that they
purposely purchased a home in that particular area because they enjoy
the peacefulness of a rural area and they do not want to be surrounded
by commercial development, and they want to maintain the rural feel
of the area.
The neighbors did not appreciate the Variance request to reduce the
residential adjacency requirement, which furthers the encroachment of
the commercial development into their residential properties. The
neighbors felt the applicant should have at least tried to meet the
minimum code requirements for development especially since the
project is adjacent to residential, and they do not feel the reduced
landscape buffer provides an adequate buffer for them either.
NE

The neighbors felt even with specialized lighting fixtures, since the
commercial buildings are so close to residential there will still be
errant lighting spilling over into their yards at night. Commercial
developments need to have adequate lighting at night for
security/safety reasons, and the lighting of their yards, rear windows
will be unavoidable at night.
Increased traffic was another concern, along with the transient
population that mini-storage facilities tend to bring.
The residents are willing to compromise if the developer will build
more homes on the lot and keep the lot residentially zoned. The
neighbors are willing to accept R-1 (Single Family Residential) as a
possible zoning district for the site in order to see homes built on the
site. They will not accept apartments, condominiums, etc. Only single
family, detached homes.
None of the residents that attended this meeting were in support of this project
and intend to rally together the remaining residents who were unable to attend
in order to protest this proposed project at the Planning Commission and City
Council meetings.
Field Check
06/02/16
Staff performed a routine field check of the subject site where a vacant,
undeveloped lot was observed.

Site Area
Net Acres
5.19
Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12
Planned or Special
R (Rural Density
Residential)
Subject Property
Undeveloped
North
Single Family
Residential,
Detached
L (Low Density
Residential)
R-1 (Single Family

Residential)
South
Undeveloped
PCD (Planned
Community
Development)
PD (Planned
Development)
NE

Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12
East
Undeveloped
West
Multi-Family
Residential
Planned or Special
RL [(Residential Low)
Rural Neighborhood
Preservation I] Clark
County
PCD (Planned
Community
Development)

R-E [Rural Estates
Residential (2 Units per
Acre)] Clark County
PD (Planned
Development)
Master Plan Areas

Trails
Compliance
N/A
Compliance
N/A
Compliance
N/A
N/A
Y
Y
Pursuant to Title 19.08, the following standards apply for the proposed C-2 (General Commercial)
Zone:
Standard
Required/Allowed
Provided
Compliance
Min. Lot Width
100 Feet
320 Feet
Y
Min. Setbacks
Front
Side
Corner
Rear
(Residential Adjacency)
North Perimeter
East Perimeter
10 Feet
10 Feet
10 Feet
20 Feet
72 Feet
36 Feet
28 Feet
40 Feet
Y
Y
Y
Y
18 Feet
20 Feet
N*
27 Feet
21 Feet
Y
Screened, Gated, w/ a
Trash Enclosure
Y**
Roof or Trellis
Roof or Trellis
Mech. Equipment
Screened
Screened
Y**
*The proposed Mini-Storage Facility does not meet the Residential Adjacency Standards.
**A Condition of Approval has been added to ensure compliance.
NE

Residential Adjacency Standards:

3:1 proximity slope East Property Line to Building
3:1 proximity slope East Property Line to Tower
3:1 proximity slope North Property Line
Required
39 Feet
63 Feet
60 Feet
Provided
Compliance
44 Feet
Y
83 Feet
Y
56 Feet
N*
Approximately
Trash Enclosure
50 Feet
Y
170 Feet
*The proposed Mini-Storage Facility does not meet the Residential Adjacency Standards along the
northern property line and a Variance has been requested to allow the reduced setback.
Pursuant to Title 19.08, the following standards apply for the proposed C-2 (General Commercial)
Zone:
Required
Provided
Compliance
Standards
Ratio
Trees
Buffer Trees:
North
15 Trees
17 Trees
Y
South
13 Trees
15 Trees
Y
East
31 Trees
35 Trees
Y
28 Trees
28 Trees
Y
West
87 Trees
95 Trees
Y
Parking Area Trees
32 Trees
27 Trees
N*
Min. Zone Width
North
8 Feet
8 Feet
Y
South
15 Feet
15 Feet
Y
East
8 Feet
8 Feet
Y
15 Feet
15 Feet
Y
West
Wall Height
6 Feet
Y
*The applicant has requested an Exception of the parking lot landscape island and parking lot
shade tree requirements.
*The applicant has requested a Variance (VAR-64887) to allow for a 40-foot Residential
Adjacency Setback along the east property line where 72 feet is required, and a 56-foot Residential
Adjacency Setback along the north property line where 72 feet is required.
NE

Street Name
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Deer Springs Way
Major Collector
Hualapai Way
Primary Arterial
Governing Document
and Highways
and Highways
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Compliance
with Street
Section
40
80
Parking Requirement
Required
Provided
Compliance
Gross Floor
Parking
Parking
Area or
Use
Parking
HandiHandiNumber of
Ratio
Regular
Regular
capped
capped
Units
1:50
Public
10
Restaurant
Seating/
with Drive2,061 SF
Waiting
Through
1:200
8
Remaining
Restaurant
with DriveThrough
2,220 SF
1:50
Public
Seating/
Waiting
29
1:200
Remaining
Car Wash,
2,300 SF
1:150
Full Service
Mini-Storage
1:50 Units
700 Units
Facility
Plus 5
General
Retail Store,
4,891 SF
1:175
Other Than
Listed
16
19
30
116
111
123
117
Y
Y
NE

Waivers
Requirement
If service or wash bay doors are
provided, openings to the bay
doors shall not face public
rights-of-way and shall be
designed to minimize the visual
intrusion into adjoining
properties.
Request
To allow a Car Wash bay to face the

public right-of-way.
Denial
A single-station drive-through
shall have a stacking lane that
will accommodate a minimum
of six vehicles, including the
vehicle at the station.
A single-station drive-through that

accommodates five vehicles,
including the vehicle at the station.
Denial
Buildings on corner lots should

be oriented to the corner and to
the street fronts, and should
make a strong tie to the building
lines of each street.
To not orient the buildings to the

corner or street fronts.
Denial
Exceptions
Requirement
One Landscape Island for Every
Six Parking Spaces
Provide 32 parking lot trees
within the landscape islands and
at the end of each row of
parking spaces.
Request
To provide seven landscape islands
throughout the parking lot where ten
landscape islands would be required.
To provide 27 parking lot trees
within the landscape islands and at
the end of each row of parking
spaces where 32 are required.
Denial
Denial
NE
GPA-64884
GPA-64884
7A7
777A7
7777A
7777A
77b77
777A
77A
777

777
777
77
77
77 77
A77 777A
77
b
b
b777b
77
7
7

77
77
7
77

77
b 7b
b77
b
b777b
b777b
77bA77
777A7
777A
7777
7777b
77
77
77AA77b
7 AAA7A
7A
77Ab7A
7A7
77 7A7A
7bA
6bb 6
6bb776
b57b
b 5 b
777b
b777b
b

b
b777b
b

b7777b
b

775
5
7

7777
67776
6
6
777
7777 7
7 77777777 7b
7 77 777 7
777 77777
7 7
77 7 7
b77
77 77
GPA-64884, ZON-64885, VAR-64887 and SDR-64886 - REVISED
7
b7A
AbA7A7

7
A
7 7
777
7
777
7
77
7b77AAA777
Ab7
A7A7AA
777A
A777777777777777
b7A
AbA7A7
A
7 7
777
7
777
7
77
7b77AAA777
Ab7
A7A7AA
777A
A777777777777777
GPA-64884, ZON-64885, VAR-64887 and SDR-64886
7b7777A7
7b77AAA77A
A
A77
777
7
777
7
77
7b77AAA777
Ab7
A7A7AA
777A
A777777777777777
A77A
A7A7A
A
7 7
777
7
777
7
77
7b77AAA777
Ab7
A7A7AA
777A
A777777777777777
A
7 7
A77A
A7A7A
A
777
7
777
7
77
7b77AAA777
Ab7
A7A7AA
777A
A777777777777777
A
7 7
A77A
A77A
777
7
777
7
77
7b77AAA777
Ab7
A7A7AA
777A
A777777777777777
AA7777A
AA777A7A
A
A77
777
7
777
7
77
7b77AAA777
Ab7
A7A7AA
777A
A777777777777777
AA7777A
AA7777A
A
A77
777
7
777
7
77
7b77AAA777
Ab7
A7A7AA
777A
A777777777777777
A
7 7
A7!7A
A7
7
777
7
777
7
77
7b77AAA777
Ab7
A7A7AA
777A
A777777777777777
AA777!7A7
AA
b
A
A77
777
7
777
7
77
7b77AAA777
Ab7
A7A7AA
777A
A777777777777777
AA7b
A
A77
7b77AAA777
Ab7
A7A7AA
777A
A777777777777777
777
7
777
7
77
GPA-64884 [PRJ-64757] - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT RELATED TO ZON-64885, VAR-64887 AND

SDR-64886 - APPLICANT/OWNER: 7470, LLC
NORTHEAST CORNER OF DEER SPRINGS WAY AND HUALAPAI WAY
06/02/16
GPA-64884 [PRJ-64757] - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT RELATED TO ZON-64885, VAR-64887 AND

SDR-64886 - APPLICANT/OWNER: 7470, LLC
NORTHEAST CORNER OF DEER SPRINGS WAY AND HUALAPAI WAY
06/02/16

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
ZON-64885 - REZONING RELATED TO GPA-64870 - PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT/OWNER: 7470, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Rezoning FROM: RE (RESIDENCE ESTATES) TO: C-2 (GENERAL COMMERCIAL) on 5.19 acres at the
northeast corner of Deer Springs Way and Hualapai Way (APN 125-19-202-006), Ward 6 (Ross)
[PRJ-64757]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
C.C.: 9/21/2016
17
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends DENIAL
2. Location and Aerial Maps - ZON-64885, VAR-64887 and SDR-64886 [PRJ-64757]

paper use, backup
ZON-64885
ZON-64885
7A7
777A7
7777A
77b77
7777A
777A
77A7

77 ?
A 7
77

7

76
6
b77b
b
b
A777A
77
7
77

7

77

77 7
77 7

77
7

b77b
b b
77 ?

77
7
777 7?

b77 ?
b
77bA77
777A7
777A
7777
7777b
77
77
77AA77b
7 AAA7A
7A
77Ab7A
7A7
77 7A7A
7bA
77 7

77A
77
7
77 7
7 76
777

b 777b
b
b77
b 7b
b
77
b 77
7b
b
77
7

b 77
7b
b
b 77

7b
b
b 7
b77

6
6
777b
7
7777 7
7 77777777 7b
7 77 777 7
777 77777
7 7
77 7 7
b7
77 77

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
VAR-64887 - VARIANCE RELATED TO GPA-64884 AND ZON-64885 - PUBLIC
HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: 7470, LLC - For possible action on a request for a
Variance TO ALLOW A 40-FOOT RESIDENTIAL ADJACENCY SETBACK ALONG THE
EAST PROPERTY LINE WHERE 72 FEET IS REQUIRED AND TO ALLOW A 56-FOOT
RESIDENTIAL ADJACENCY SETBACK ALONG THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE WHERE
72 FEET IS REQUIRED on 5.19 acres at the northeast corner of Deer Springs Way and
Hualapai Way (APN 125-19-202-006), Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-64757]. Staff recommends
DENIAL.
C.C.: 9/21/2016
17
RECOMMENDATION:

paper use, backup
VAR-64887
VAR-64887

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
SDR-64886 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO GPA-64884, ZON64885, VAR-64887, AND VAR-65068 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: 7470,
LLC - For possible action on a request for a Site Development Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED
3,668 SQUARE-FOOT GENERAL RETAIL STORE, OTHER THAN LISTED
[CONVENIENCE STORE] WITH FUEL PUMPS AND CANOPY, A 1,223 SQUARE-FOOT
GENERAL RETAIL STORE, OTHER THAN LISTED, A 2,300 SQUARE-FOOT CAR
WASH, FULL SERVICE WITH A WAIVER TO ALLOW THE CAR WASH BAY TO FACE
THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY WHERE SUCH IS NOT PERMITTED, A 2,220 SQUAREFOOT RESTAURANT WITH DRIVE-THROUGH WITH A WAIVER TO ALLOW A
STACKING LANE FOR FIVE VEHICLES WHERE SIX VEHICLES IS REQUIRED, A 2,061
SQUARE-FOOT RESTAURANT, WITH DRIVE THROUGH, AND A 700-UNIT, 84,800
SQUARE-FOOT MINI-STORAGE FACILITY WITH WAIVERS TO ALLOW FIVE FEET OF
PERIMETER LANDSCAPE BUFFERING ON A PORTION OF THE EAST PROPERTY
LINE WHERE EIGHT FEET IS THE MINIMUM REQUIRED AND TO NOT ORIENT THE
BUILDINGS TO THE CORNER AND STREET FRONTS WHERE SUCH IS REQUIRED on
5.19 acres at the northeast corner of Deer Springs Way and Hualapai Way (APN 125-19-202006), R-E (Residence Estates) Zone [PROPOSED: C-2 (General Commercial)] Ward 6 (Ross)
C.C.: 9/21/2016
18
RECOMMENDATION:
3. Protest Postcards

paper use, backup
SDR-64886
SDR-64886
SDR 64886
7470, LLC
NWC Deer Springs Way & Hualapai Way

Proposed 96.272 thousand square foot commercial development.
First Use
152.84

GAS/SERVICE W/MARKET & CAR WASH
[FUELING POSITIONS]
AM Peak Hour
16
PM Peak Hour
11.93
13.94
2,445
191
223
Second Use
496.12

FAST-FOOD WITH DRIVE-THRU [1000
SF]
AM Peak Hour
4.281
PM Peak Hour
49.35
33.84
2,124
211
145
Second Use
42.94
SHOPPING CENTER [1000 SF]
AM Peak Hour
1.223
PM Peak Hour
1.00
3.73
53
1
5
Second Use
2.50
MINI-WAREHOUSE [1000 SF, GROSS]
AM Peak Hour
84.8
PM Peak Hour
0.15
0.26
212
13
22
Total Use
42.94
AM Peak Hour
PM Peak Hour
1.00
3.73

Deer Springs Way
2,729
218
Hualapai Way
96.272
26,163
2,093
4,834
416
395

Deer Springs Way
Hualapai Way

16,300
34,500
This project will add approximately 4,834 trips per day on Deer Springs Wy. and Hualapai Wy. Deer Springs is currently at
about 17 percent of capacity and Hualapai is at about 76 percent of capacity. After this project, Deer Springs is expected to
beat about 46 percent of capacity and Hualapai to be at about 90 percent of capacity.
Based on Peak Hour use, this development will add into the area roughly 416 additional cars, or about seven every
minute.
Jul07
16
08:41a
Vegas Drilling lnc
7026555513
p,1
Clry of l-a Vegas

Depanrnen( of Planning
Llevg16pn Sen.iccs Cener
.3 No;rh Rancbo Drivc. J'J Floor
PRSRT
RRSTq-ASS IAII
U.S, Postaoe
PAlD'
l.rs Vegas. Nevarla 89105
Las Vegas,
Permit No,
Ref urn Service Req uestcd

Official Notice of Public Hea rrng
llV
t6!0
REEruE
JUL
20tri
eity of Las Veqas

uept. of planni-ing
tolt
rtts*
ll
ycu uiish tcr file your proesl or suppcrt 0n this
rcqucsr..
clccl
rhe
rpprcprialc bo.t bclcrv ad rcturn lhis card in an envclope with pcrstage t<r thc
Dcpa{ime.!t ol'Planninp at thc adJress listd abor,, tix ths side or- this cad to
(142> 4&-7.99. f you *ould likc ro cr.rnact your Council Reprcsentativc,
plec call (703) 129-6405.
9212010
f SI.'PPCRT
I OPPOSE
rhis Request
this Reques
foryour conrments.
12sr
ROEINSON CRISTINE
SCO1T SUSAN
6922 HOPI SUvtMll Cl'
LAS VGAS t'V 8r9
cso: 6oF1816
sDR-Gr886 [PRJ-64757]
Planning Commission Meeting af 711212016
i:';:-
F"trF:.i_iF
j- ,3 l:.i
\rl,,htl,tr,ltulrlrlhh,
r,
Illl111,,111,1il
t,t,ulil,rutlult
ubnitted ftr llnl ageru
,*?f ttllf,qf,
City of Las \tegas

I)epanrnent of Plrtnning
PRSRT
FIRSTCLASS lvlAlL
U.S. Postage
l)evdlop.mcnt .Scr'vices Center

33.1 Norrh lancho Drive, 3d ltlcnr
l*s Vcgas, Ncva<lo 89106
PAID
Las Vegas, NV
Permit No. 1630
RECIVE}
Ratu rn Service Requcsted
Ollicinl Notice
of'
Public l{caring
JUL
11
2016
City of Las Vegas

DePt. of Planning
toqtt
Cry l{ll
triffl*D
t lt.hjt
Il
you.rvish
to lle your
prorest
or support on this
requcst, check the
appropriate box belorv antl retum rhis ccrd in arr cnvelope v,,ith posuge to rhe
f)cprtnrcnt of [)lannirrg at thc arldrcss listc.d ahovc, fx tlris side ol'this cnrd to
('1021 464-7499. If yon would like to contict ycxrr Council Representatir,c,
plea ie call (7 02) 229 -6405
I ltsuPPoRl' N'flc)PPosE
l-l rhislleoucsr \l rttir llcqucrt
Pleas.e use available blark space on
sDR-64886 l.PRr -647 57

Pl an nin g co nt mi ss io
iaslgailoro
cas6: sDH'{i{886
GOODMAN MICHAEL W J & EATRICE A

6902 LAKOTA SUMMIT C
LASVSGASNV 89149
card for your commerrts.
ti:l,llr
"l'l}r?f.t * ;i. rjr

"ut
.:ri
r:,'i.'ii
llllr'l,lrtll,'lltlJlf"f 'll,f ,,lll,tllllrtll,lff
lf
r,ll,f l'1,
u?
City of Las Vcgas
PRSRT
FISTCLASSMAIL
U.S, Postaoe
opartmcnt of Planning
l)wilopment Selviccs Ccnlcr
333 North'lncho t)rive, 3'd :loor
ls Vegas. Nevada 89106
pat0-
Las Vegas, NV
Permr No. 1630

RECTV
JUL 11
outrt
216
of Las Vegas
Dept. of Planning
GTty
CityHall
tt i x.hf
If
you.wish to file your potest or support on this regucst, check tlte

appropriate box bclow and rctunt this cad in an crtvelope witlt posutge to'iltc
Depnnrent ol Plannirrg at rhc addrcss lstcd ahorc, fax this sidc of'this crd to
(707) 464-'1499. If yorr w<rlrl likc to corrttct youl Courrcil Reptesentative,
rleaSe call ('lZ) 229-6405
f-l
l_l
Requcsr lVl
l31
suPFoRr
this
ias1g211o1o
cas: sD'64886
GOODMAT'I MICHAEL W J & BATRICE A
6902 LAI(OTA SUI4MIT CT
LASVEGASNV 89I49
t oPPos
this llcquest
Please use avilablc blarrk space on crd for your cornmerts.
sDR-64886 IPRI-647571
pranning conrmission *;:.,$.,q ,t1,!r]r?!,,f*lr!,,,,
,.
#,:ir
.rr ,.,r..i.r
lltf
l,l,llfl,,lltll,l',1,f l,tf,t'lll,lllfllll,lllff ,,ll'fl,l,
1LI P
RECIVF.D
'JUL
Cii
11
2016
City of Las Vegas

Dept. of Planning
ot'Las vegas
PRSRT
FIRST CLASS MAIL
Dcpartment ol' Planning

Dcvelopment Servces Ccnter
133 Nonh Rrneho l)rive, 3d Floor
U.S. Postage
PAI D
Las Vegas, NV
Permit No. 1630

DUttl
o()7
City Hall
If you wish to le your protest or supporl on lhis request.
check
the
appropriale ho.x below and retum this card in an envclope with postage to the
Depannrcnt of Planning at the address listed abovc. fax this si<Je of this card to
(lO2) 464-7499.
lf
you.would like o contact your Council Represenrarive'
plcasc call (702) 229-640.5.

I SUPPORT
this Rcquest
Cso: SDB-886
12519212002
ANDERSON TOMMY JOE & SEVERLY A
6975 HOPI SUMMIT CT
LAS VEGAS NV 89149
I OPPOSE
this Requcst
Please use available blank space on card for your comluents
sDR.64886
Planrring Commiss
i ':r 'i|:::i:'i'ji:: j. .* j.,:i.*
,lr,,Hr,rhl,llhtll,,hlt,lill,ll,"'ltill,htlt,lrl,l,lt llll
14P
City of Las Vcgas
PRSRT
FIRSTCLASS MAIL
U.S. Poslage
Developmcnt Servics Center
333 North Rncho Drve.3d Floor
Las Vegas. Nevado 891 06
PA ID
Las Vegas, NV
Permit No. 1630

Official Notice of Puhlic Hearing
RECEIVED
JUL
wtt
2016
City of Las Vegas

Dept. of Planning
Ciry Hall
93 t
ll' you wish to lle
11
&i
5r
your protest or support on this reguest. chcck
the
appropriate box below and retum this card in an envelope with postage to lhe
Deparncnt of Planning at the address listed above, tx this side of this card to
(702) 464-7499. lf you would like to
your Council Represenlative,
plcasc cal I (7 OZ) 229 -6405.
1 251 931 1 004

JACKSON ALVIN
Case: SDB'64886
GINA
6701 BBISTL FALLS ST

LAS VEGAS NV 89149
I OPPOSE
this Request
I SUPPORT
this Request
SDR-4E86 [PRJ-64757]
pranning commission
":i'l
*rl,,,l,r],r8,lfr*r.
iF f ,{.,;
l'f ,rf Irf ll,frlrlf

'1,'f 'l,f
r'lll'tl'llllth,',lltlll',tl,ll'
'lLt ?
PRSRT
City ol Las Ve-eas

Deparlnrent of Planning
FIRST CLASS MAIL
U.S. Poslage
Developnrent Services Center

333 Noih Rancho Drive. 3'd Floor
Las Vegas. Nevatja 89106
PA ID
Las Vegas, NV
Permit No. 1630

RECEIVD
JUL tr 1
\
wtt
City Hall
2O16
Clty of Las Veoas

Dept. of Ptann'ing
/\
l,l
Clty
llll
tdilh
trt
4ug*b5
If
you wish to f'le yqur protest or supporl on this request. check
the
appropriate box below and retum this card in an envelope with postagc to the
Department ol'Planning at the addrcss listcti abovc. lax this side of this card to
(702) 464-7499. If you would like to contact your Council Reprcsentative'
plu,ase
call (702\ 229-61105.

I SUPPORT
this Request
1251921
i005
case: sDR-&886
FATA DAVID C & LISA A

6945 LAKOTA SUMMIT CT
LAS VEGAS NV 89]49
ffii,?,'.",:.,,
Please use available blank spaceton card for your comments
sDR-64886 [PRJ-64757]
Pranning Cornrnission
ti"r*T
"J,##Elr"
, s,4s
ttllt,,lr,lllllllrl,t,f
l,,f tl,lf
t,t,,rl,tlll,lttlf ill,f,f l,l,l,ll
1Lt?
City of Las Vcgas

l)cpartment of Planning
RECEIVED
l)cvelopmcnt Scrviccs Ccntcr

333 North Rancho l)rive. 3d Floor
Las Vegas. Nevada 89 I 06
iul
PRSRT
FIRSI CLASS MAIL

I1
City of Las Veqas

Dept. of ptanriing
uact{&b J^Y ar a
\> Zonre$
V l.[p\.,)t\--\G \ t{
6tt
\\
fsor,rlul
h*,sr\T\AL oo
l'
Clty H.tl
LMI6I*p
t tn !
lf' you wish to lle your protest or support on this request, check the
approprate box bclow and return this card in an envelope with postage to the
Depanment of'Planning at the adtlress listcd above, fix this side of this card to
(7W, 464-7499. ll' you would like to contct your Council Rcprcscntative,
p lcase ca I I (7 02) 229 -6405.
I SUPPORT
this Rcquest
U.S. Postage
PAI D
Las Vegas, NV
Permil No. 1630
2016
',
,u'
nr.,,
ooru
case: sH-g886
MERRITT RUSSELL W & THERESA

9812 GUIDING LIGHT AVE
LAS VEGAS NV 89149
oPlsE
this Rcqucst
sDR-64886 [PRJ-64757]
Prarrning commission *i"1,9
"J,lT#rl",.
i r i.
llt,,,t, lilfiltlt,t,llt't,,h,t,, lllft l,l,flf
,t
llll, ltlflh I'
-lL{
City of Las Vegas
PRSRI
FIRSTCLASS MAIL
U.S. Postags
PAI D
Las Vegas, NV
Deparlment of Planning
Dcvilopent Scrvices Center
333 Norrh'Rancho Drive,3d Floor
Permil N0.
Return Servlce Requested

Offieial Notiee of Pullic Hearing
RECEIVD
JUL
I 1 2016
City of Las Vegas

Dept. of Planning
0ulrt
4tt I
If
Lb
you .wish to fle your prolest or support on this reguest, chcck
the
appropriate box below and rctum this card in an envelope wilb postege to'the
l)epirriment of Planrrirrg t lhr ddress listed above, fax this side of this card to
(702) 46+1499. If yorr would like to contact your Council R&p'e,scntativ,
pleasc call QA 229-6405
l-I
l-l
r251 921 101 0
Requesr
ffi
Casa: SDR'64886
GOODMAN MICHAEL W J & BEATRICE A

6902 LAKOTA SUMMTT GT
LASVEGASNV 89149
suPPrr lFzl r oPPosE
'ur
.1630
rtrts Requcst
Please use available blank space on card for your cornments,
sDR-64886 IPRJ-4757]
Pr arr n in
g cornmi ssion
M9"illg
" J!;rl"?,P,i:,,_.r
:*
.i,:.1..:i
lltfr,r,rlll,,llf
f1,,f
,il,l,l,llf ,lllf llllrilllllf ',ll,f l,l,
1Ll,?

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
ZON-65286 - REZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/ OWNER: 900 - 932 CASINO
CENTER, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Rezoning FROM: R-4 (HIGH DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL) AND C-2 (GENERAL COMMERCIAL) TO: C-1 (LIMITED
COMMERCIAL) on 1.25 acres at the southwest corner of Casino Center Boulevard and Hoover
Avenue (APNs 139-34-410-032 through 038), Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-64602]. Staff recommends
APPROVAL.
C.C.: 9/21/2016
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps - ZON-65286, SUP-65287 and SDR-65288 [PRJ-64602]
2. Conditions and Staff Report - ZON-65286, SUP-65287 and SDR-65288 [PRJ-64602]
3. Supporting Documentation - ZON-65286, SUP-65287 and SDR-65288 [PRJ-64602]
4. Photo(s) - ZON-65286, SUP-65287 and SDR-65288 [PRJ-64602]
5. Justification Letter - ZON-65286, SUP-65287 and SDR-65288 [PRJ-64602]
ZON-65286, SUP-65287 and SDR-65288 [PRJ-64602]

DEPARTMENT:
PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/ OWNER: 900 - 932 CASINO CENTER, LLC
CASE
NUMBER
RECOMMENDATION
ZON-65286
SUP-65287

conditions:
conditions:
SDR-65288
REQUIRED FOR
APPROVAL
ZON-65286
ZON-65286
SUP-65287
** NOTIFICATION **
33
NOTICES MAILED
394 ZON-65286 and SUP-65287

394 SDR-65288
APPROVALS
0 ZON-65286 and SUP-65287

0 SDR-65288
PROTESTS
0 ZON-65286 and SUP-65287

0 SDR-65288
FS

Conditions Page One
** CONDITIONS **
Planning
1.
Conformance to all Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.12 for the Mixed Use
land use.
2.
3.
4.
Safety.
5.
6.
7.
Planning
1.
2.
FS

Conditions Page Two
3.
All development shall be in conformance with the site plan and phasing plan date stamped
07/19/16, and landscape plan, floor plans and building elevations, date stamped 06/21/16,
except as amended by conditions herein.
4.
A Waiver from Downtown Centennial Plan Arts District architectural standards is hereby
approved to allow no shade devices (awnings, canopies, etc.) on the pedestrian level and to
allow a design and exterior materials that do not contribute to the artistic character of the
District.
5.
Reflective or tinted glass shall not exceed 60 percent of the overall exterior enclosure of
any building. Reflectivity of any glass shall not exceed 22 percent reflectivity index. Only
non-reflective clear glass or non-reflective tinted glass with a visible light transmittance of
about 60 shall be used on ground floors in all pedestrian-oriented areas.
6.
Service areas (including storage, special equipment, maintenance, trash dumpsters and
loading areas) shall be screened from pedestrian or street view with elements that
contribute to the aesthetic expression of the building.
7.
All service and loading areas shall be positioned so service vehicles will not disrupt traffic
flow to or from the site or within parking lots. No service, storage, maintenance or loading
area may extend into a setback area.
8.
Safety.
9.
10.
The applicant shall coordinate with the City Surveyor and other city staff to determine the
most appropriate mapping action necessary to consolidate the existing lots. The mapping
action shall be completed and recorded prior to the issuance of any building permits.
11.

changes from the conceptual landscape plan: Deglet-Noor Date Palms or similar type
palms 25 feet tall and spaced at 30-foot increments along Casino Center Boulevard; and
36-inch box shade trees at 15 to 20 feet intervals along Hoover Avenue and Coolidge
Avenue.
FS

12.
No turf shall be permitted in the non-recreational common areas, such as medians and
amenity zones in this development.
13.
14.
A Comprehensive Construction Staging Plan shall be submitted to the Department of

Planning for review and approval prior to the issuance of any building permits. The
Construction Staging Plan shall include the following information: Design and location of
construction trailer(s); design and location of construction fencing; all proposed temporary
construction signage; location of materials staging area; and the location and design of
parking for all construction workers.
15.
16.
Public Works
17.
Dedicate a 10-foot radius on the southwest corner of Hoover Avenue and Casino Center
Boulevard and the northwest corner of Casino Center Boulevard and Coolidge Avenue
prior to the issuance of any permits. Coordinate with the Right-of-Way Section of the
Department of Public Works for assistance in preparing the appropriate documents.
18.
Remove all substandard public street improvements and unused driveway cuts, if any,
adjacent to this site and replace with new improvements meeting current City Standards
concurrent with on-site development activities.
19.
Landscape and maintain all unimproved right-of-way adjacent to this site. All landscaping
and private improvements installed with this project shall be situated and maintained so as
to not create sight visibility obstructions for vehicular traffic at all development access
drives and abutting street intersections.
20.
Extend Public sewer in Coolidge Avenue or Hoover Avenue to the west edge of this site
concurrent with on-site development activities.
FS

21.
Contact the City Engineers Office at 229-6272 to coordinate the development of this
project with the Downtown Pedestrian and Bicycle Improvements Coolidge Avenue
project and any other public improvement projects adjacent to this site. Comply with the
22.
Works prior to the issuance of any building or grading permits, submittal of any
construction drawings or the recordation of a Map subdividing this site, whichever may
occur first. Comply with the recommendations of the approved Traffic Impact Analysis
prior to occupancy of the site. The Traffic Impact Analysis shall also include a section
addressing Standard Drawings #234.1 #234.2 and #234.3 to determine additional right-ofway requirements for bus turnouts adjacent to this site, if any; dedicate all areas
recommended by the approved Traffic Impact Analysis. All additional rights-of-way
required by Standard Drawing #201.1 for exclusive right turn lanes and dual left turn lanes
shall be dedicated prior to or concurrent with the commencement of on-site development
activities unless specifically noted as not required in the approved Traffic Impact Analysis.
Phased compliance will be allowed if recommended by the approved Traffic Impact
Analysis. No recommendation of the approved Traffic Impact Analysis, nor compliance
therewith, shall be deemed to modify or eliminate any condition of approval imposed by
the Planning Commission or the City Council on the development of this site.
23.
Meet with the Flood Control Section of the Department of Public Works for assistance with
establishing finished floor elevations and drainage patterns for this site prior to submittal of
construction plans or the issuance of any building or grading permits, whichever may occur
first. Provide and improve all drainage ways as recommended.
FS

** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The request is for a rezoning from R-4 (High Density Residential) and C-2 (General
Commercial) to C-1 (Limited Commercial), a Special Use Permit to allow a mixed-use
development within the Las Vegas Arts District, and a Site Development Plan Review for a
phased 14-story mixed-use building consisting of commercial, restaurant and residential uses at
the southwest corner of Casino Center Boulevard and Hoover Avenue.
ISSUES
A rezoning from R-4 (High Density Residential) and C-2 (General Commercial) to C-1
(Limited Commercial) has been requested. Staff recommends approval of this request.
A Special Use Permit is required for a mixed-use development within the Las Vegas Arts
District. Staff recommends denial of this request.
A Site Development Plan Review is being requested for a phased 14-story Mixed-Use
development. Staff recommends denial of this request.
The building faade is not consistent with the architectural standards of the Downtown
Centennial Plan and a waiver has been requested to provide relief from these requirements.
Staff recommends denial of this request.
The proposed parking garage will be constructed as a second phase, which means no onsite
parking will be available for the proposed 198 multi-family units and 7,279 square feet of
commercial space associated with the first phase. Staff does not support this request.
ANALYSIS
The rezoning request is from R-4 (High Density Residential) and C-2 (General Commercial) to
C-1 (Limited Commercial.) The subject parcel is located within the Las Vegas Redevelopment
Plan Area with a MXU (Mixed Use) future land use designation. The MXU (Mixed Use)
category allows for a mix of uses that are normally allowed within the L (Low Density
Residential), ML (Medium Low Density Residential), M (Medium Density Residential), H (High
Density Residential), O (Office), SC (Service Commercial), and GC (General Commercial)
Master Plan land use categories. Staff recommends approval of the rezoning request.
A Special Use Permit is required for Mixed Use developments within the 18b Arts District of the
Downtown Centennial Plan.
FS

Mixed Use is defined as The vertical integration of residential uses and commercial or civic
uses within a single building or a single development, where the uses share pedestrian access,
vehicular access, parking functions, or any combination thereof.
1. Residential uses permitted as of right in the R-3 and R-4 Zoning Districts may be
permitted by means of a Special Use Permit within a P-O, O or C-PB Zoning District.
This requirement does not apply to the subject site.
2. Nonresidential uses permitted as of right in the P-O, O and C-1 Zoning Districts may be
permitted by means of a Special Use Permit within an R-3 or R-4 Zoning District.
With the approval of the associated rezoning request, this requirement will not apply to
the subject site.
3. Commercial uses or civic uses shall at a minimum be located at the ground level fronting
the primary public rights-of-way and may extend beyond the ground floor. The principal
entryway to access those uses, whether individually or collectively, shall be directly
accessed from and oriented to the public sidewalk.
The proposal is in compliance with this requirement.
4. Residential uses shall not be permitted on the ground floor fronting on primary public
rights-of-way, but may be located at or above the second level of the building.
Residential uses may be located on the ground floor of any building or portion thereof
that is located at the interior of the development site and does not front on an arterial or
collector street.
5. Surface parking lots shall be located to the side or the rear of the principal building(s) on
the site, and shall be screened from view of the adjacent rights-of-way by the principal
building(s) or a landscape buffer in conformance with the requirements of LVMC
Chapter 19.08. Parking structures shall not be located along the street frontages of the
development site, but shall be screened from view of the adjacent rights-of-way by the
principal building(s).
FS

Staff recommends denial as the proposed use cannot be conducted in a manner that is
harmonious and compatible with development in the area because the use is proposed in a
building that does not meet the architectural standards of the Downtown Centennial Plan.
The Site Development Plan Review request is for a 14-story phased mixed-use development with
33,396 square feet of commercial space and 458 residential units with waivers of the Downtown
Centennial Plan architectural standards at the southwest corner of Hoover Avenue and Casino
Center Drive. The residential units will consist of both age restricted and standard market rate
apartments. The site is located within the Las Vegas Redevelopment Area, the 200-foot Airport
Overlay District and the Live/Work Overlay District. The site is in compliance with all
applicable regulations of these districts.
Per the provided phasing plan, the project is expected to be built in three phases. The first phase
will consist of 198 multi-family units with ground floor commercial, the second phase will
consist of a 370 space parking garage, and the final phase will consist of an additional 260 multifamily units with ground floor commercial. The applicant has indicated that the residential
component of the first phase will consist of age restricted units, while the units associated with
the third phase will be market rate apartments. The site plan shows that the two residential
buildings will be separated by a centrally located parking garage.
With the proposed parking garage being constructed in the second phase, no parking is being
proposed for the 198 multi-family units and 7,279 square feet of commercial space associated
with the first phase. While the Downtown Centennial Plan allows for flexibility and does not
require the automatic application of Title 19 parking standards, phase one of the project would
normally require 99 parking spaces for the age restricted apartments and 42 spaces for the 7,279
square feet of retail space if it were located outside the Downtown Centennial Plan area. Overall,
the site will provide 370 parking spaces where 582 would normally be required for all phases.
Staff does not support the prosed phasing of parking as the parking demand of the uses will
negatively impact the surrounding area and there is no guarantee that future phases will be
constructed.
On the ground level, the floor plans indicate 7,279 square feet of commercial space within the
north building, and 9,721 square feet of commercial space within the southern building. A
parking valet area will be available on the ground floor of the proposed parking garage with a
total of 30 spaces. Both buildings will have a loading zone with direct access to the adjacent
alleyway. There are proposed circular drives providing access to the ground floor commercial
entrances from both Hoover Avenue and Coolidge Avenue. Parking garage access is provided
from a pair of drives fronting Casino Center Boulevard. The drives into the garage will be rightturn in and right-turn out only.
FS

Floors 2-12 of the northern building will house 198 age restricted apartments. The floorplans
indicate 66 studio units and 132 one bedroom units. Floors 2-14 of the southern building will
house 260 standard market rate apartments. The floorplans indicate 104 studio units, 104 onebedroom units, and 52 two-bedroom units. The proposed parking garage is 12 stories and
contains a total of 370 parking spaces (including the valet parking). The roof level indicates an
8,564 square-foot restaurant with outdoor seating, a fitness center, and pool area.
The building elevations depict a multi-level building with a monolithic exterior consisting mostly
of glass and metal. The elevations do not meet the architectural standards of the Downtown
Centennial Plans 18b Arts District. The goal of the 18b Arts District is to encourage building
design that contributes to the quality of life in an active, aesthetically considered manner. Street
level design should enliven the street with visual continuity of activity from interior uses to the
pedestrian experience. Extended, solid walls are discouraged at the street level. The elevations
provided depict a building that lacks articulation and visual interest, and exhibits characteristics
that do not meet the intent or the spirit of the 18b Arts District. The use of arcades, awnings,
canopies and other shade devices are also required on the pedestrian level, but no such amenities
have been provided. The use of glass for over 60 percent of the building is prohibited within the
Arts District, and non-reflective clear or tinted glass must be used in all pedestrian oriented
areas. A waiver from the Downtown Centennial Plan 18b Arts District architectural standards is
required to provide relief from these requirements, and staff recommends denial as there has
been no justification provided for not using a more innovative design as required by the
Downtown Centennial Plan.
The Downtown Centennial Plan requires a streetscape consisting of a 10-foot sidewalk and a 5foot amenity zone. Along Hoover Avenue and Coolidge Avenue, 36-inch box shade trees are
required every 20 feet on-center. Casino Center Boulevard requires a 10-foot sidewalk and a 5foot amenity zone, and the Downtown Centennial Plan calls for 25-foot tall Deglet-Noor Date
Palms spaces 30 feet on-center. Complete street improvements were installed by the City along
Hoover Avenue (CIP-25798) and Casino Center Boulevard (CIP-16526) in the late 2000s. The
City is currently in the design stage (CIP-53541) to install complete street improvements along
Coolidge Avenue. The tree spacing on the landscape plans along all three street frontages
exceed the maximum allowed, but a number of access drives have been proposed and
consideration will need to be given to the required sight visibility zones. A condition of approval
has been included to revise the landscape plan to depict the proper tree spacing; however
meeting the requirement may not be feasible due to drive spacing and site visibility issues.
Las Vegas Valley Water District
The parcels are currently served by Las Vegas Valley Water District from Casino Center
Boulevard. The proposed development will require at least one large above-ground backflow
prevention assembly that cannot be placed in the sidewalk, below ground or inside of a
room. Revision of the site plan will be required prior to civil plan submittal to provide a setback
FS

adjacent to the water main to allow for the above-ground water facilities. Any proposed
revisions will be required to meet Downtown Centennial Plan standards. Proof of parcel lot
consolidation will be required prior to civil plan approval.
Staff recommends denial of the Site Development Plan Review due to the building design not
being appropriate for the Las Vegas Arts District. The building does not show visual interest or
articulation as required by the Downtown Centennial Plan, and it does not have the proper shade
devices at the pedestrian level. The heavy use of glazing and monolithic building faade is more
appropriate for a suburban location rather than within the downtown core. Also of concern is the
lack of parking proposed with first phase of the project. While the Downtown Centennial Plan
allows for flexibility and does not require the automatic application of development standards,
the parking garage is being proposed with the second phase, and no onsite parking will be
available for the residential and commercial associated with the first phase. In addition, there is
no guarantee when or if the additional phases will be built in the future, which could leave the
first phase without parking indefinitely.
1.

The proposed rezoning is consistent with the MXU (Mixed Use) Las Vegas
Redevelopment Plan Area designation.
2.
The uses which would be allowed on the subject property with the approval of the C-1
(Limited Commercial) zoning district will be compatible with surrounding land uses and
zoning districts.
3.
The location of the subject site within the Downtown Centennial Plan area and the
compatibility of the surrounding uses indicate the appropriateness of the rezoning.
4.
FS

The adjacent street network is adequate in size to meet the requirements of the zoning
district.
1.
The proposed use cannot be conducted in a manner that is harmonious and compatible
with existing and future land uses as projected by the General Plan as the use is proposed
within a building that is not appropriate for the Las Vegas Arts District.
2.
The site is physically suitable for the type and intensity of land use proposed.
3.
The adjacent street network is adequate in size to meet the requirements of the proposed
use.
4.
General Plan.
The proposed use will not be inconsistent with, or compromise the public health, safety,
and welfare or the overall objectives of the General Plan
5.
The use meets all conditions of Title 19.12.
FS

1.

Development within the Las Vegas Arts District is intended to utilize exterior materials
that contribute to the artistic character and quality of life of the District. The proposed
building incorporates design characteristics that are not consistent with the requirements of
the Downtown Centennial Plan, and are therefore it is not compatible with development in
the surrounding area.
2.
The required waiver of Downtown Centennial Plan architectural requirements makes the
proposed development inconsistent with Downtown Centennial Plan standards and Title
19.10.110.
3.

The adjacent street network is adequate in size to meet the requirements of the proposed
use and it will not negatively impact adjacent roadways or neighborhood traffic.
4.
The building materials used do not contribute to the artistic character and quality of life of
the Arts District. The heavy use of glazing in conjunction with a monolithic building
faade is more appropriate for a suburban location rather than within the downtown core.
The building as proposed does not promote the architectural intent of the Arts District and
is not appropriate for the area or for the City.
5.

The building design is not appropriate for the Las Vegas Arts District. The building does
not show visual interest or articulation as required by the Downtown Centennial Plan, and
it does not have the proper shade devices such as awnings or canopies at the pedestrian
level. The monolithic building faade does not create an aesthetically pleasing
environment and it is not compatible with the intent of the Downtown Centennial Plan.
FS

6.
general welfare.
Appropriate measures have been taken to secure and protect the public health, safety and
general welfare.
The City Council approved rezoning (Z-0100-64) to reclassify approximately
230 Acres generally located on property bounded by Main Street to the west,
Bonanza Road on the north, Las Vegas Boulevard on the east, and Charleston
12/16/64
Boulevard on the south from R-1 (Single Family Residential), R-4 (High
Density Residential), C-1 (Limited Commercial) and C-V (Civic) to C-2
(General Commercial).
The City Council approved a Site Development Plan Review (SDR-5782) for
03/16/05
a proposed 821 square-foot office conversion. Staff had recommended denial
and the Planning Commission recommended approval on 02/10/05.
A Capital Improvement Plan (CIP-16526) was approved for bicycle and
04/09/09
pedestrian improvements along Casino Center Boulevard.
A Capital Improvement Plan (CIP-25798) was approved for bicycle and
08/07/09
pedestrian improvements along Hoover Avenue.

09/12/11
A pre-application meeting was held and issues discussed included the need
for a rezoning action to make the entire project area consistent; the need for a
05/04/16
Special Use permit for a mixed use building within the Arts District; the
requirements for an age restricted community; and the need for a mapping
action to join all existing parcels.
A neighborhood meeting was not required nor was one held.
FS

Field Check
06/30/16
The subject site is populated with a number of buildings that are either vacant
or occupied with small businesses.

Site Area
Net Acres
1.28
Surrounding
Property
Subject Property
Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12
Multi-Family;
Office; Undeveloped
North
Multi-Family
South
Retail
East
Multi-Family;
Office; Undeveloped
West
Office; Undeveloped
Planned or Special
MXU (Mixed Use) Las
Vegas Redevelopment
Plan Area designation
MXU (Mixed Use) Las
Vegas Redevelopment
MXU (Mixed Use) Las
Vegas Redevelopment
MXU (Mixed Use) Las
Vegas Redevelopment
MXU (Mixed Use) Las
Vegas Redevelopment

C-2 (General
Commercial); R-4 (High
C-2 (General
Commercial)
C-2 (General
Commercial)
C-2 (General
Commercial)
C-M
Master Plan Areas

A-O (Airport Overlay) District
Compliance
N
Compliance
N
Y
Y
Compliance
Y
N/A
N/A
FS

Development within the Las Vegas Arts District is intended to utilize exterior materials that
contribute to the artistic character and quality of life of the District. The proposed building
incorporates design characteristics that are not consistent with the requirements of the Downtown
Centennial Plan standards. The site is located within the 200-foot Airport Overlay and the
Live/Work Overlay, and the site is in compliance with all applicable regulations of these overlay
districts.
Pursuant to Title 19.10.110, the following standards apply:
Standard
Required/Allowed
Provided
Compliance
Min. Lot Size
N/A
55,756 SF
Y
Min. Lot Width
N/A
140 Feet
Y
Min. Setbacks
Front
N/A
0 Feet
Y
Side
N/A
0 Feet
Y
Corner
N/A
0 Feet
Y
Rear
N/A
0 Feet
Y
Max. Lot Coverage
N/A
100 %
Y
N/A
150 Feet
Y
Screened, Gated, w/
Trash Enclosure
N/A
N
a Roof or Trellis
Mech. Equipment
Screened
N/A
N
It is not indicated whether proposed trash enclosures or mechanical equipment will be screened,
but a condition of approval has been included to ensure compliance with the screening
requirements of the Las Vegas Arts District.
Street Name
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Governing Document
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Compliance
with Street
Section
Casino Center
Major Collector
Planned Streets and

Highways Map
80 ft.
Hoover Avenue
Coolidge Avenue
Major Collector
Major Collector
N/A
N/A
80 ft.
80 ft.
Y
Y
Pursuant to the Downtown Centennial Plan, the following streetscape treatment is required
for the proposed development.
FS

Casino Center
Required
10-foot sidewalk and 5foot amenity zone with
25 ft. Deglet-Noor Date
or similar palms spaced
30 feet O.C.
Hoover Avenue

36 box shade trees
spaced 20 feet O.C
Coolidge Avenue

36 box shade trees
spaced 20 feet O.C
Provided
Compliance
25 ft. Deglet-Noor Date
N
or similar palms spaced
more than 30 feet O.C.
36 box shade trees
N
spaced more than 20
feet O.C
36 box shade trees
N
spaced more than 20
feet O.C
The tree spacing on the landscape plans along all three street frontages exceed the maximum
allowed, but a number of access drives have been proposed and consideration will need to be
given to the required sight visibility zones. A condition of approval has been included to require
a revised the landscape plan that depicts the proper tree spacing; however meeting the
requirement may not be feasible due to drive spacing and site visibility issues.
FS

Provided
Compliance
Gross Floor
Parking
Parking
Area or
Use
Parking
HandiHandiNumber of
Ratio
Regular
Regular
capped
capped
Units
Senior
0.5 space
198 units
99
Apartments
per unit
1 per
studio or 1
bedroom
unit
208 studio
and one
1.75 per
bedroom units
Multi-Family
two
299
Residential
bedroom
unit
52 two
bedroom units
2 per three
or more
bedroom
units
1 per 175
Retail
17,000 sq. ft.
98
sq. ft.
1 per 50
sq. ft. of
dining
Restaurant
8,564 sq. ft.
86
area and 1
per 200 of
remainder
N
582
370
570
12
370
0
N
Loading
17,000 sq. ft
2
2
Y
Spaces
With the proposed parking garage being constructed in the second phase, no parking will be
provided for the proposed 198 senior housing units and 7,279 square feet of commercial space
associated with phase one. As a comparison, phase one of the project would require 141 spaces
for if it were located outside the Downtown Centennial Plan area. Overall, the site will provide
370 garaged parking spaces (including valet) where 570 would be required outside of the
Downtown Plan Area.
FS
ZON-65286
ZON-65286
7A
7A
7b
A
7
b
A
b
7A
7A
A
7
A
7
7b
7bA A7
77
7
A
7
7bA7b
7
7bAA7
7b
7b A7
7b77b
77A7

77 >
A 7
77

7

6
76
A777A
77
7
77
7

77
77
b77b
b
b

777
b 777b
b
b77
b
7b
b
77
7

b 77
7b
b
77
7

7b
b 77

b
b
7b
b 77

b
77 7
77 >

77
7
777 7>

b77 >
b
77 7

77 7

77A
77
7
77 7
7 76
b 7
b77

6
6
b77b
b
b
7777 7
7 77777777 7b
7 77 777 7
777 77777
7 7
77 7 7
b7
77 77
ZON-65286, SUP-65287 and SDR-65288
ZON-65286, SUP-65287 and SDR-65288
ZON-65286, SUP-65287 and SDR-65288
ZON-65286, SUP-65287 and SDR-65288
ZON-65286, SUP-65287 and SDR-65288
ZON-65286, SUP-65287 and SDR-65288
ZON-65286, SUP-65287 and SDR-65288
ZON-65286, SUP-65287 and SDR-65288
ZON-65286, SUP-65287 and SDR-65288
ZON-65286 [PRJ-64602] REZONING RELATED TO SUP-65287 AND SDR-65288 - APPLICANT/ OWNER:

900 - 932 CASINO CENTER, LLC
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF CASINO CENTER BOULEVARD AND HOOVER AVENUE
06/30/16

06/30/16

06/30/16

06/30/16

bA 7
7 7
7 7 7 77 7 7 -777 7 7b 7b 7 77 7 7 7
7 7- 7 7 7 7 77 7 7 77 7 7 7 7 7
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 77 7 777 7 7 77 7 7
7 7 7 7 77 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 77 7 7
7 7 7 7 7 77 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 77
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 -7 7 7 7 7 77
77 7 7 77 7 7 7 77 7 7 7 77 7
7 77 7 7 77 7 7 7 7 7 7 77 7
7 - 7 7 7 7 777 - 7 77 7 - 7 7 77 7 - 7
77 77 7 7 7 - 77 7 7 7 7 -
7 77 7 7 7 7 77 7 7 7 77 - 7 7 7
7 -7 7 7
7 77 7 77b 7 7 7 7 7b 77A7 7 7 7 7
7 7 7 7 77 7 7 7
7 7 77 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7 7 7 7 77 7 7 77 7 7 7 7 7 77
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7 7 -7 7 77 7
7 7777 7 7 7 7 7 7 - 7 77 7 777 7 7
7 7 7 7 77 7 77 7 - 77 7 7 7 7 77 7 -

A7 7 7 7 77 7 7 7 77 7 7 7 7
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 77- 7 7
7 77 7 7 7 77 7 7 77 7 7 7 7
7 7
7b 7b 7b7
ZON-65286, SUP-65287 and SDR-65288

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
SUP-65287 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT RELATED TO ZON-65286 - PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT/OWNER: 900 - 932 CASINO CENTER, LLC - For possible action on a request
for a Special Use Permit FOR A 14-STORY MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT INCLUDING
33,396 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL SPACE AND 458 RESIDENTIAL UNITS on 1.25
acres at the southwest corner of Casino Center Boulevard and Hoover Avenue (APNs 139-34410-032 through 038), R-4 (High Density Residential) and C-2 (General Commercial) Zones
[PROPOSED: C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone], Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-64602]. Staff
recommends DENIAL.
C.C.: 9/21/2016
RECOMMENDATION:

paper use, backup
SUP-65287
SUP-65287

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
SDR-65288 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO ZON-65286 AND SUP65287 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER:900 - 932 CASINO CENTER, LLC - For
possible action on a request for a Site Development Plan Review FOR A 14-STORY MIXEDUSE DEVELOPMENT INCLUDING 33,396 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL SPACE
AND 458 RESIDENTIAL UNITS WITH WAIVERS OF DOWNTOWN CENTENNIAL PLAN
ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS on 1.25 acres at the southwest corner of Casino Center
Boulevard and Hoover Avenue (APNs 139-34-410-032 through 038), R-4 (High Density
Residential) and C-2 (General Commercial) Zones [PROPOSED: C-1 (Limited Commercial)
Zone], Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-64602]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
C.C.: 9/21/2016
RECOMMENDATION:

paper use, backup
SDR-65288
SDR-65288
SDR 65288
900-932 Casino Center, LLC
SWC Hoover Avenue & Casino Center Boulevard

Proposed 458 unit apartment complex with 33.396 thousand square feet of commercial space.
First Use
AM Peak Hour
42.94
33.396
PM Peak Hour
1.00
3.73
1,434
33
125
Second Use
AM Peak Hour
6.65
APARTMENT [DWELL]
458
PM Peak Hour
0.51
0.62
3,046
234
284
Total Use
AM Peak Hour
6.65
APARTMENT [DWELL]
PM Peak Hour
458
0.51
0.62
4,480
267
409

Hoover Avenue
804
64
Casino Center Boulevard

2,244
180

Hoover Avenue

13,040
16,300
This project will add approximately 4,480 trips per day on Hoover Ave. and Casino Center Blvd. Hoover is currently at
about 6 percent of capacity and Casino Center is at about 14 percent of capacity. After this project, Hoover is expected to
be at about 41 percent of capacity and Casino Center to be at about 41 percent of capacity.
Based on Peak Hour use, this development will add into the area roughly 409 additional cars, or about nine every two
minutes.

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
ZON-65372 - REZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: NEVADA SAFES OWNER: MCC INVESTMENT COMPANY LTD - For possible action on a request for a
Rezoning FROM: R-1 (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) AND C-1 (LIMITED
COMMERCIAL) TO: C-1 (LIMITED COMMERCIAL) on 0.53 acres at 5250 West Charleston
Boulevard (APN 138-36-803-004), Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-65195]. Staff recommends
APPROVAL.
C.C.: 9/21/2016
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Abeyance Request Letter - ZON-65372, VAR-65373, VAR-65374, SUP-65375 and SDR65376 [PRJ-65195]
2. Location and Aerial Maps - ZON-65372, VAR-65373, VAR-65374, SUP-65375 and SDR65376 [PRJ-65195]
3. Conditions and Staff Report - ZON-65372, VAR-65373, VAR-65374, SUP-65375 and SDR65376 [PRJ-65195]
4. Supporting Documentation - ZON-65372, VAR-65373, VAR-65374, SUP-65375 and SDR65376 [PRJ-65195]
5. Photo(s) - ZON-65372, VAR-65373, VAR-65374, SUP-65375 and SDR-65376 [PRJ-65195]
6. Justification Letter - ZON-65372, VAR-65373, VAR-65374, SUP-65375 and SDR-65376
[PRJ-65195]
7. Protest/Support Postcards ZON-65372 and VAR-65373 [PRJ-65195]
ZON-65372, VAR-65373, VAR-65374, SUP-65375 and

SDR-65376
ZON-65372, VAR-65373, VAR-65374, SUP-65375 and SDR-65376 [PRJ-65195]

DEPARTMENT:
PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: NEVADA SAFES - OWNER: MCC INVESTMENT
COMPANY LTD
CASE
NUMBER
ZON-65372
VAR-65373
VAR-65374
SUP-65375
SDR-65376
RECOMMENDATION
conditions:
conditions:
conditions:
conditions:
REQUIRED FOR
APPROVAL
N/A
ZON-65372
ZON-65372
VAR-65373
ZON-65372
VAR-65373
VAR-65374
ZON-65372
VAR-65373
VAR-65374
SUP-65375
** NOTIFICATION **
21
NOTICES MAILED
249 ZON-65372 and VAR-65373

249 VAR-65374 and SUP-65375
249 SDR-65376
APPROVALS
1 ZON-65372 and VAR-65373

0 VAR-65374 and SUP-65375
0 SDR-65376
PROTESTS
2 ZON-65372 and VAR-65373

3 VAR-65374 and SUP-65375
3 SDR-65376
RG

Conditions Page One
** CONDITIONS **
Planning
1.
Approval of a Rezoning (ZON-65372) and approval and conformance to the Conditions of

Variance (VAR-65374), Special Use Permit (SUP-65375) and Site Development Plan
2.
3.
Safety.
4.
5.
Planning
1.

Variance (VAR-65373), Special Use Permit (SUP-65375) and Site Development Plan
2.
RG

Conditions Page Two
3.
Safety.
4.
5.
Planning
1.
Conformance to all Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.12 for a Boat & Trailer
Dealership (New and Used) use.
2.

Variance (VAR-65373), Variance (VAR-65374) and Site Development Plan Review
(SDR-65376) shall be required, if approved.
3.
4.
Waiver from Title 19.12 is hereby approved, to allow a minimum site area of 23,087
square feet.
5.
Safety.
6.
7.
RG

Planning
1.

Variance (VAR-65373), Variance (VAR-65374) and Site Development Plan Review
(SDR-65376) shall be required, if approved.
2.
3.
Conformance to the approved conditions for Plot Plan Review [Z-0006-66(6)], except as
amended herein.
4.
All development shall be in conformance with the site plan, and building elevations, date
stamped 06/23/16, except as amended by conditions herein.
5.
Safety.
6.
7.
RG

** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The request is for a Rezoning of the subject property from R-1 (Single Family Residential) and
C-1 (Limited Commercial) to C-1 (Limited Commercial), with two Variances for setback
requirements and for parking requirements, a Special Use Permit to allow a Boat & Trailer
Dealership (New and Used) and a conversion of four shipping containers to a building. The
subject property contains an existing General Retail Store, Other than Listed.
ISSUES
A Rezoning from R-1 (Single Family Residential) and C-1 (Limited Commercial) to C-1
(Limited Commercial) has been requested. Staff recommends approval of this request.
A Variance is required to allow a five-foot front yard setback and zero-foot side yard setback
where 10 feet is required for the proposed 1,280 square-foot building. Staff recommends
denial of this request.
A Variance to allow a seven-foot front yard setback and zero-foot side yard setback where 10
feet is required for the existing 7,980 square-foot nonconforming building. Staff
recommends denial of this request.
A Variance is required to allow zero additional parking spaces where eight additional spaces
are required on a Parking Impaired Development. Staff recommends denial of this request.
A Boat & Trailer Dealership (New and Used) use is permitted in the C-1 (Limited
Commercial) zoning district with an approval of a Special Use Permit, with a waiver to allow
a minimum site area of 23,087 square feet where 25,000 square feet is required. Staff
recommends denial of this request.
A Site Development Plan Review is required for the conversion of the four shipping
containers totaling to 1,280 square feet to a building. Staff recommends denial of this
request due to the Variance requests.
ANALYSIS
The subject property is located within an Airport Overlay with 200 feet maximum height
requirement. The proposed development will not affect this overlay.
The subject property partially zoned as an R-1 (Single Family Residential), along the portion of
the north property and the remaining part of the property is mostly zoned as C-1 (Limited
Commercial). The underlying General Plan land use designation of the subject property is
MXU (Mixed Use). With the proposed Rezoning to C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning district is
still consistent with the General Plan. Staff recommends approval.
RG

The existing General Retail Store, Other than Listed use located at 5250 West Charleston
Boulevard is parking impaired; it met the parking requirements at the time the Plot Plan Review
[Z-0006-66(6)] was approved in 1968. The subject site currently provides 13 parking spaces
where the current requirement of the Unified Development Code is 53 spaces. Per Title
19.18.030 only the additional spaces are required. A total of eight additional spaces are required,
but no additional spaces will be provided. Staff does not support this request.
The proposed conversions of the four shipping containers are located within the required setback.
The subject property is considered a Double Frontage Lot, pursuant to Title 19.18. The property
fronts Charleston Boulevard and Alpine Place and each of these frontages are considered a front
yard setback. The proposed setbacks of these structures will be at five feet from the front yard
and zero feet from the side yard. Staff does not support this request.
In addition, the existing building is seven feet from the front setback and zero feet from the side
yard setback. Pursuant to Title 19.14, this building is classified as nonconforming. If the current
building is damaged greater than 50 percent, the new building will not be able to be rebuilt at the
current setback. In accordance to Title 19.14, it is generally the intent of this Title to permit
these nonconformities to continue until they are removed or abandoned, or until such earlier time
as they are ordered to be removed, but not to encourage their survival. Approval of a variance
for the existing structure would reclassify it as a conforming structure. Staff does not support
this request.
The Las Vegas Valley Water District (LVVWD) has commented on the requested Site
Development Plan Review, This parcel is currently served but does not have the required
backflow prevention per NAC 445A.67195. Civil and plumbing plans will need to be submitted
to LVVWD for domestic meter sizing, fire flow availability and backflow retrofit. If utility
boxes are required on the subject property it will be subject to Title 19.08.030 development
standards.
A Boat & Trailer Dealership (New and Used) use is permitted in the C-1 (Limited Commercial)
district with an approved Special Use Permit. The Boat & Trailer Dealership (New and Used)
use is defined as The use of any building or lot for the display and sale of new or used boats, jet
skis or other marine vessels, along with corresponding trailers. In the Justification Letter, date
stamped 06/23/16, the applicant requests that the existing establishment to be allowed to sell
small utility trailers.
1. The minimum site area shall be 25,000 square feet.
The proposed use does not meet this requirement; the subject property is only 23,087
square feet. The application is requesting for a waiver of this requirement.
RG

2. No vehicle, boat or trailer service or repair work shall occur except within a fully
enclosed structure.
The proposed use meets this requirement, as the applicants justification letter, dated
06/23/16, states that there will be no service or repair work done on site.
3. All sales activities and storage shall be within an enclosed structure. (C-1 only).
The proposed use meets this requirement, as the applicants justification letter, dated
06/23/16, states that it will only sell small utility trailers and all sales activities and
storage will occur within the enclosed structure on site.
The site is not physically suitable for the type and intensity of the proposed land use. Title
19.12, specifies for the Boat & Trailer Sales (New and Used) use requires a minimum site area of
25,000 square feet, where the subject site has an area of 23,087 square feet. In addition,
variances for parking and setbacks are required, indicating that the proposed use is too intense.
Staff recommends denial of this request. If this application is approved, it is subject to
conditions.
1.

The site is currently has a land use designation of MXU (Mixed Use). The north portion
of the subject property is currently zoned R-1 (Single Family Residential) and the request
to Rezone to C-1 (Limited Commercial) would allow conformance to the General Plan of
the City.
2.
The proposed rezoning of the remaining portion of the northern property to C-1 (Limited
Commercial) will be compatible with the surrounding land uses and zoning districts. The
purpose of the Rezoning is to clean up a split-zoned parcel and bring it into conformance
with the General Plan.
RG

3.
The subject property has been a General Retail Store, Other than Listed use and the
compatibility of the surrounding uses indicates the appropriateness of the rezoning.
4.
The adjacent streets are adequate in size to meet the requirements of the zoning district.
1.
2.
3.


property at the time of enactment of the regulation, or by reason of exceptional
topographic conditions or other extraordinary and exceptional situation or condition of
the piece of property, the strict application of any zoning regulation would result in
peculiar and exceptional practical difficulties to, or exceptional and undue hardships
upon, the owner of the property, a variance from that strict application may be granted so
as to relieve the difficulties or hardship, if the relief may be granted without substantial
detriment to the public good, without substantial impairment of affected natural resources
and without substantially impairing the intent and purpose of any ordinance or
resolution.
The applicant has created a self-imposed hardship by overbuilding the site such that the setbacks
cannot be met for the proposed building. Redistributing the other storage containers towards the
location of the Loading Zone on the provided site plan would allow conformance to the Title 19
requirements. Approval of a variance for the existing structure would reclassify it as a
conforming structure. Pursuant to Title 19.14, It is generally the intent of this Title to permit
these nonconformities to continue until they are removed or abandoned, or until such earlier time
as they are ordered to be removed, but not to encourage their survival. In view of the absence
of any hardships imposed by the sites physical characteristics, it is concluded that the
applicants hardship is preferential in nature, and it is thereby outside the realm of NRS Chapter
278 for granting of Variances.
RG

1.
2.
3.


resolution.
The applicant has created a self-imposed hardship by overbuilding the site such that current
parking requirements cannot be met. Reducing the number and size of the storage containers
would allow conformance to the Title 19 requirements by providing additional parking spaces.
In view of the absence of any hardships imposed by the sites physical characteristics, it is
concluded that the applicants hardship is preferential in nature, and it is thereby outside the
realm of NRS Chapter 278 for granting of Variances.
1.
The proposed land use can be conducted in a manner that is harmonious and compatible
with existing surrounding land uses by the General Plan and with future surrounding land
uses as the sale of utility trailers will occur with an existing General Retail Store, Other
than Listed use.
RG

2.
The site is not physically suitable for the type and intensity of the proposed land use. Title
19.12, specifies for the Boat & Trailer Sales (New and Used) use requires a minimum site
area of 25,000 square feet. The site currently has an area of 23,087 square feet.
3.
The adjacent street facilities are adequate in size to meet the requirements of the proposed
use.
4.
General Plan.
The approval of the Special Use Permit on this subject property will be subject to
condition of approval and business license approval and compliance.
5.
The proposed use does not meet all of the applicable conditions of Title 19.12. The subject
property has a minimum site area of 23,087 square feet and 25,000 square feet is required.
The applicant has requested waiver to allow this use to occur in a 23,087 square-foot area.
1.

The proposed development is not compatible with adjacent development and development
in the area. The proposed conversion requires an additional eight parking spaces and does
not meet the required setbacks. The applicant has requested for two Variances for parking
and setbacks.
2.
RG

The proposed development is not consistent with Title 19 regarding parking and setback
requirements. The applicant has applied for Variances for these issues.
3.

The Site can be accessed along Charleston Boulevard and the circulations do not
negatively impact adjacent roadways or neighborhood traffic.
4.
The building materials are not appropriate for the area and for the City; the building to be
converted are storage containers. The existing landscaping on site will not be affected by
the project.
5.

The building elevations, design characteristics and other architectural and aesthetic
features are undesirable. The building is a painted, metal storage container that is not
harmonious or compatible with development in the area.
6.
general welfare.
The proposed addition will be subject to plan check review and inspections in order to
protect the public health, safety and general welfare by the City staff.
The Board of City Commissioners approved a request for Rezoning (Z-000603/02/66
66) from: R-1 (Single Family Residential) and R-4 (High Density Residential)
to: C-1 (Limited Commercial).
The Planning Commission approved a request for a Plot Plan Review [Z08/08/68
0006-66(6)] for a proposed retail appliance store on the north side of
Charleston Boulevard west of Brush Street, C-1 zone.
RG


The City Council approved a request for a Variance (V-0016-96) to allow
access onto Alpine Place where such is prohibited by the original zoning
04/17/96
conditions of Rezoning (Z-0006-66) at 5250 West Charleston Boulevard. The
Board of Zoning Adjustment and staff recommended for approval.
The Board of Zoning Adjustment approved a one-year Required Review [V04/01/97
0016-96(1)] on the property located at 5250 West Charleston Boulevard.
A Code Enforcement case (#164752) was processed for sign violations and
03/23/16
storage containers in the rear of the property located at 5250 West Charleston
Boulevard. The case is currently active.

11/22/99

A building permit (#44842) was issued for a commercial building at 5250
10/16/68
West Charleston Boulevard. The permit was finalized on 6/25/69.
A building permit (#18682) was issued for exterior and interior tenant
10/1/74
improvement at 5250 West Charleston Boulevard. The permit was finalized
on 11/15/74
A building permit (#2416) was issued for a building addition at 5250 West
05/02/77
Charleston Boulevard. The permit was finalized on 08/04/77.
A business license (#G62-05622) for gun safe sales at 5250 West Charleston
06/19/14
Boulevard. The license is currently active.
A building permit (#275222) was issued for a sign at 5250 West Charleston
12/09/14
Boulevard. The permit was finalized on 03/24/15.
A pre-application meeting was conducted with the applicant to discuss the
submittal requirements for Rezoning, Variance, Special Use Permit and Site
Development Plan Review applications. The applicant proposes to convert
the existing shipping containers into permanent structure. The proposed
conversion results in an increase of eight parking spaces. The applicant was
06/15/16
informed of a second application for Variance for a parking is required on a
Parking Impaired Development.
It was discussed that the existing
nonconforming building on-site can be added as part of the Variance
application in addition to the setback for the proposed conversion of the
storage containers.
RG

Field Check
06/30/16
A field check was conducted by staff and observed the storage containers
located in the rear of the property.

Site Area
Net Acres
0.53
Surrounding
Property
Subject Property
North
South
East
West
Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12
General Retail,
Other than Listed
Single Family,
Detached
General Retail,
Other than Listed
General Retail,
Other than Listed
Vacant
Planned or Special
MXU (Mixed Use)
MXU (Mixed Use)

MXU (Mixed Use)
MXU (Mixed Use)
MXU (Mixed Use)

R-1 (Single Family
Residential)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
R-CL (Single-Family
Compact-Lot)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
Master Plan Areas

A-O (Airport Overlay) District (200 feet)
Trails
Compliance
N/A
Compliance
Y
Compliance
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
RG

Standard
Required/Allowed
Provided
Min. Lot Width
100 Feet
99 Feet
Proposed building Min. Setbacks
Front
10 Feet
5 Feet
10 Feet
0 Feet
Side
Existing nonconforming building Min.
Setbacks
Front
10 Feet
7 Feet
Side
10 Feet
0 Feet
Max. Lot Coverage
50 %
39 %
Storage Containers Max. Building Height
N/A
10 Feet
*Nonconforming lot
**A Variance (VAR-65373) application for setbacks is part of this request.
Street Name
Charleston
Boulevard
Alpine Way
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Primary Arterial
N/A
Governing Document
Planned Streets and
Highways Map
N/A
Compliance
Y*
N**
N**
N**
N**
Y
Y
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Compliance
with Street
Section
100
60
N/A
Parking Requirement
Required
Provided
Compliance
Gross Floor
Parking
Parking
Area or
Use
Parking
HandiHandiNumber of
Ratio
Regular
Regular
capped
capped
Units
General Retail
7,890 SF
1/175 SF
46
Store
Storage
Container
1,280 SF
1/175 SF
+8
Conversion
(addition)
54
13
N*
52
2
12
1
N*
Loading
9,170 SF
1
1
1
Y
Spaces
*A Variance (VAR-65374) for parking is part of this application request.
RG
ZON-65372
ZON-65372
b7
AA7
A7b
A7
AA7
AA7A
A7
7bA7
7A
7A
7A
77A7

77 >
A 7
77

7

76
6
A777A
77
7
77
7

77

77
7

b77b
b b
777

b 777b
b77
b 7b
b
77
b 77
7b
b
77
7

b 77
7b
b
b
b 77

7b
b
77 7
77 >

77
7
777 7>

b77 >
b
77 7

77 7

77A
77
7
77 7
7 76
b 7
b77

6
6
7A
b77b
b
b
777b
7b
7
7777 7
7 77777777 7b
7 77 777 7
777 77777
7 7
77 7 7
b7
77 7 7
b
7
A7AbA7
AbA7A
77777777
ZON-65372, VAR-65373, VAR-65374, SUP-65375 and SDR-65376
777777A777
77bAA7b7A7A777
77b7
b
7
A7AbA7
AbA7A
77777777
777777A777
77bAA7b7A7A777
77b7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
b7777
7777777
b77
7777777
A77777b
7
77
7777
7 7
b77
7777
777
77
7
7"7

77
7
"7
A77777b
7
777
77
7777
7b77
ZON-65372 [PRJ-65195] REZONING RELATED TO VAR-65373, VAR-65374, SUP-65375 AND SDR65376 - APPLICANT: NEVADA SAFES - OWNER: MCC INVESTMENT COMPANY LTD
06/30/16
06/30/16
06/30/16
06/30/16
06/30/16
06/30/16
06/30/16
06/30/16
06/30/16
06/30/16
06/30/16
06/30/16

SDR-65376

SDR-65376

SDR-65376

SDR-65376

SDR-65376

SDR-65376

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
VAR-65373 - VARIANCE RELATED TO ZON-65372 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT:
NEVADA SAFES - OWNER: MCC INVESTMENT COMPANY LTD - For possible action on
a request for a Variance TO ALLOW A FIVE-FOOT FRONT YARD SETBACK AND TO
ALLOW A ZERO-FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK WHERE 10 FEET IS REQUIRED FOR A
PROPOSED 1,280 SQUARE-FOOT BUILDING; AND TO ALLOW A SEVEN-FOOT FRONT
YARD SETBACK AND ZERO-FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK WHERE 10 FEET IS
REQUIRED FOR AN EXISTING NONCONFORMING BUILDING on 0.53 acres at 5250
West Charleston Boulevard (APN 138-36-803-004), R-1 (Single Family Residential) and C-1
(Limited Commercial) Zones [PROPOSED: C-1 (Limited Commercial)], Ward 1 (Tarkanian)
C.C.: 9/21/2016
RECOMMENDATION:

paper use, backup
VAR-65373
VAR-65373

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
VAR-65374 - VARIANCE RELATED TO ZON-65372 AND VAR-65373 - PUBLIC
HEARING - APPLICANT: NEVADA SAFES - OWNER: MCC INVESTMENT COMPANY
LTD - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW ZERO ADDITIONAL
PARKING SPACES ON A PARKING IMPAIRED DEVELOPMENT WHERE EIGHT
ADDITIONAL SPACES ARE REQUIRED on 0.53 acres at 5250 West Charleston Boulevard
(APN 138-36-803-004), R-1 (Single Family Residential) and C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zones
[PROPOSED: C-1 (Limited Commercial)], Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-65195]. Staff recommends
DENIAL.
C.C.: 9/21/2016
RECOMMENDATION:
3. Protest Postcards VAR-65374 and SUP-64375 [PRJ-65195]

paper use, backup
VAR-65374
VAR-65374

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
SUP-65375 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT RELATED TO ZON-65372, VAR-65373 AND VAR65374 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: NEVADA SAFES - OWNER: MCC
INVESTMENT COMPANY LTD - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit
FOR A PROPOSED BOAT AND TRAILER DEALERSHIP (NEW AND USED) WITH A
WAIVER TO ALLOW A MINIMUM SITE AREA OF 23,087 SQUARE FEET WHERE 25,000
SQUARE FEET IS REQUIRED at 5250 West Charleston Boulevard (APN 138-36-803-004), R1 (Single Family Residential) and C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zones [PROPOSED: C-1 (Limited
Commercial)], Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-65195]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
C.C.: 9/21/2016
RECOMMENDATION:

paper use, backup
SUP-65375
SUP-65375

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
SDR-65376 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO ZON-65372, VAR65373, VAR-65374 AND SUP-65375 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: NEVADA SAFES
- OWNER: MCC INVESTMENT COMPANY LTD - For possible action on a request for a Site
Development Plan Review FOR THE PROPOSED CONVERSION OF FOUR SHIPPING
CONTAINERS TOTALING 1,280 SQUARE FEET TO A BUILDING on 0.53 acres at 5250
West Charleston Boulevard (APN 138-36-803-004), R-1 (Single Family Residential) and C-1
(Limited Commercial) Zones [PROPOSED: C-1 (Limited Commercial)], Ward 1 (Tarkanian)
C.C.: 9/21/2016
RECOMMENDATION:

paper use, backup
SDR-65376
SDR-65376

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
VAR-65224 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: SCHOOL BOARD
OF TRUSTEES - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW 23
ADDITIONAL PARKING SPACES WHERE 30 ADDITIONAL SPACES ARE REQUIRED
FOR A PROPOSED PUBLIC SCHOOL, PRIMARY EXPANSION on 9.68 acres at 5701
Stacey Avenue (APN 138-24-202-001), C-V (Civic) Zone, Ward 5 (Barlow) [PRJ-64693]. Staff
recommends DENIAL.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps - VAR-65224 and SDR-64809 [PRJ-64693]
2. Conditions and Staff Report - VAR-65224 and SDR-64809 [PRJ-64693]
3. Supporting Documentation - VAR-65224 and SDR-64809 [PRJ-64693]
4. Photo(s) - VAR-65224 and SDR-64809 [PRJ-64693]
5. Justification Letter - VAR-65224 and SDR-64809 [PRJ-64693]
VAR-65224 and SDR-64809 [PRJ-64693]

DEPARTMENT:
PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: SCHOOL BOARD OF TRUSTEES
CASE
NUMBER
VAR-65224
SDR-64809
RECOMMENDATION
conditions:
conditions:
REQUIRED FOR
APPROVAL
If approved, subject to
If approved, subject to
VAR-65224
** NOTIFICATION **
NOTICES MAILED
444
APPROVALS
PROTESTS
14
SS
VAR-65224 and SDR-64809 [PRJ-64693]

Conditions Page One
** CONDITIONS **
Planning
1.
2.
Safety.
3.
4.
Planning
1.
The previously approved Minor Amendment (SDR-58865) shall be expunged upon final
approval of this Site Development Plan Review (SDR-64809).
2.
Approval of and conformance to the conditions of approval for a Variance (VAR-65224)

shall be required, if approved.
3.
Conformance to the conditions of approval for a Plot Plan Review (Z-0053-98), except as
amended herein.
4.
SS
VAR-65224 and SDR-64809 [PRJ-64693]

Conditions Page Two
5.
All development shall be in conformance with the site plan, landscape plan, and building
elevations, date stamped 05/25/16, except as amended by conditions herein.
6.
Safety.
7.
8.

9.
Public Works
10.
Correct all Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) deficiencies on the sidewalks adjacent
to this site in accordance with code requirements of Title 13.56.040, to the satisfaction of
the City Engineer concurrent with on-site development activities. All existing paving
damaged or removed by this development shall be restored at its original location and to its
original width concurrent with development of this site.
11.
all drainageways recommended in the approved drainage plan/study. The developer of this
site shall be responsible to construct such neighborhood or local drainage facility
Studies and approved Drainage Plan/Study concurrent with development of this site.
SS
VAR-65224 and SDR-64809 [PRJ-64693]

** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is proposing to expand an existing elementary school at 5701 Stacey Avenue by
adding a new two-story classroom building on the eastern portion of the property and three new
portable classroom buildings on the western portion of the property.
ISSUES
A Major Amendment of the approved Plot Plan Review (Z-0053-98) is required for a
proposed 12,120 net square-foot expansion of an existing 67,973 square-foot Public School,
Primary.
A Variance is required to allow 23 additional parking spaces where 30 additional spaces are
required for the proposed expansion of a parking impaired school development. Staff
recommends denial of the request.
This request qualifies as a Major Amendment of the approved Plot Plan Review, as it triggers
an increase in the parking requirement, necessitating a Variance.
If this Major Amendment is approved, a Condition of Approval has been added to expunge
the previously approved Minor Amendment (SDR-58865), as this approval will no longer be
needed.
ANALYSIS
The original 45,550 square-foot elementary school was constructed in 1965 at 5701 Stacey
Avenue. In 1998, the City Council approved a Plot Plan Review (Z-0053-98) for an 8,033
square-foot expansion. The subject site consisted of 10 portable classrooms totaling 14,400
square feet, bringing the total space dedicated to the school to 67,973 square feet. The
combination of existing buildings and modular buildings currently provides 56 classrooms,
office space, a library, multi-purpose room, teachers lounge, kitchen and restrooms.
In May 2015, the Department of Planning administratively approved a Minor Site Development
Plan Review (SDR-58865) for a 14,710 square-foot single-story classroom building addition to
the site that consisted of 14 new classrooms and two restroom facilities. As part of this request,
seven of the existing modular buildings (including 14 classrooms) would be removed, for a total
of three portables. An additional 23 parking spaces were proposed. As the site is already
parking impaired and there was no net change in the number of classrooms, no additional spaces
were required as a result of the expansion. This entitlement has not been exercised, and the
classroom building has not yet been constructed.
SS
VAR-65224 and SDR-64809 [PRJ-64693]

The current proposal modifies the previous approval by calling for a 30,200 square-foot, twostory classroom building with 18 classrooms, while adding back three of the modular buildings
for a total of six. The total number of classrooms (including modular) would increase from 56 to
66. Based on the net increase in the number of classrooms, 30 additional parking spaces are now
required. The applicant is proposing the same 23-space auxiliary parking area proposed through
SDR-58865, prompting a request for a variance for seven spaces. As the hardship is selfimposed through the addition of more classrooms, staff recommends denial.
The proposed two-story building would be constructed on the northeast corner of the subject site
on an existing outdoor recreation field, which would be relocated to the southeast corner. The
submitted elevations depict a painted CMU exterior with metal accents. Consistent architectural
details are proposed on all sides of the building, and windows are provided at regular intervals.
The proposed building height will meet residential adjacency requirements relative to protected
properties to the north and east and will be well under the 105-foot restriction of the Airport
Overlay District.
Pursuant to Title 19.10.020(E)(2), property in the C-V (Civic) zoning district adjacent to
residential uses in the U, R-E, R-D, R-1, R-SL, R-CL and R-2 Districts is subject to the height
standards of LVMC 19.06.060. The subject site is adjacent to R-1 (Single Family Residential)
zoning designations to both the north and east. At a maximum height of approximately 34 feet,
the proposed two-story classroom building meets the R-E (Residence Estates) height limitation.
Perimeter and parking lot landscaping standards are met by this Major Amendment. In addition
to nine existing mature trees, the applicant is proposing an adequate number of 24-inch box Rio
Grande Ash and Mondel Pine trees along the north and east perimeter buffers. A wide 28-foot
landscape buffer will be provided along the east property line for additional screening from
existing single family homes.
The Las Vegas Valley Water District (LVVWD) comments: This parcel is currently served but
the additional water fixture units require a new water commitment from LVVWD. Civil and
plumbing plans will need to be submitted to LVVWD for domestic meter sizing.
As the parking variance cannot be supported, staff recommends denial of the Site Development
Plan Review.
1.
2.
3.

SS
VAR-65224 and SDR-64809 [PRJ-64693]


resolution.
No evidence of a unique or extraordinary circumstance related to the subject site has been presented.
The applicant has created a self-imposed hardship by adding more classrooms, which increases the
net parking requirement for the site. Provision of fewer classrooms and/or increasing the amount of
parking provided would allow conformance to Title 19 requirements. In view of the absence of any
hardships imposed by the sites physical characteristics, it is concluded that the applicants hardship
is preferential in nature, and it is thereby outside the realm of NRS Chapter 278 for granting of
Variances.
1.

The proposed classroom building would replace seven existing modular buildings, which
are not aesthetically compatible with buildings in the surrounding residential
neighborhood. The applicant has provided additional trees and buffer area along the east
property line to provide additional screening from the existing single-family residences to
the east. However, less parking is being provided than is required by the proposed
buildings and structures. This can lead to traffic congestion in the area.
2.
The proposed expansion will increase the net overall school floor area by 18 percent. The
increase triggers and increase in the parking requirement, which is not being met by the
proposal. The development as proposed is consistent with all other Title 19 requirements.
SS
VAR-65224 and SDR-64809 [PRJ-64693]

3.

Access to the site is provided by Stacey Avenue and Winwood Street. Both roadways are
Local Streets of less than 60 feet. These rights-of-way will continue to be adequate to
meet the needs of the school use and will not negatively impact neighborhood traffic.
4.
The materials used for construction of the proposed expansion are typical for those used
for other institutional uses in Las Vegas. The proposed vegetation and existing mature
trees are appropriately used along the perimeter of the site and in the proposed parking lot.
5.

The submitted elevations show an aesthetically pleasing building with variations in
exterior color, materials, rooflines and wall planes. The design characteristics are
compatible with other existing buildings and surrounding neighborhood, and the proposed
building would replace several existing modular buildings with a permanent structure.
6.
general welfare.
All improvements will be subject to inspection and final approval by Clark County School
District (CCSD) Building Department Inspection Services and the State of Nevada Public
Works Division.
SS
VAR-65224 and SDR-64809 [PRJ-64693]

The Board of City Commissioners approved a Rezoning (Z-0109-62) from RR (Rural Residential) to R-1 (Single Family Residential) on property located
11/14/62
at the southeast corner of Winwood Street and Stacey Avenue. The Planning
The City Council approved a Rezoning and Plot Plan Review (Z-0053-98)
from R-1 (Single Family Residential) to C-V (Civic) for a 53,573 square-foot
09/14/98
Public School, Primary building on property located at the southeast corner of
Winwood Street and Stacey Avenue. The Planning Commission and staff
recommended approval.
Staff administratively approved a Minor Amendment (SDR-58865) of a
previously approved Plot Plan Review (Z-0053-98) for a 5,638 square-foot
04/28/15
expansion to an existing 66,533 square-foot Public School, Primary building
complex on 9.68 acres at 5701 Stacey Avenue.
The Planning Commission tabled a Major Amendment (SDR-61069) of a
previously approved Plot Plan Review (Z-0053-98) for a proposed 9,892
11/03/15
square-foot expansion to an existing 66,533 square-foot Public School,
Primary on 9.68 acres at 5701 Stacey Avenue, at the applicants request.

02/15/63

A 45,540 square-foot Public School, Primary building was constructed at
c.1965
5701 Stacey Avenue.
A pre-application meeting was held with the applicants designated
representative to discuss the development review requirements to replace
05/17/16
seven existing modular buildings with a two-story permanent structure. It
was determined that the scope of the proposed addition would constitute a
Major Site Development Plan Review.
SS
VAR-65224 and SDR-64809 [PRJ-64693]

Field Check
06/02/16
A field check conducted on the subject property revealed an existing

elementary school that is well maintained with a number of temporary
classrooms.

Site Area
Net Acres
9.68
Surrounding
Property
Subject Property
North
South
East
West
Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12
Public School,
Primary
Single Family,
Detached
Planned or Special
C-V (Civic)
L (Low Density
Residential)
Multi-Family
Residential
M (Medium Density
Residential)
Single Family,
Detached
Multi-Family
Residential
L (Low Density
Residential)
M (Medium Density
Residential)
R-1 (Single Family

Residential)
R-PD12 (Residential
Planned Development
12 Units per Acre)
R-1 (Single Family
Residential)
R-3 (Medium Density
Residential)
Master Plan Areas

C-V (Civic) District
A-O (Airport Overlay) District 105 Feet
Trails
Compliance
N/A
Compliance
Y
Y
Compliance
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
SS
VAR-65224 and SDR-64809 [PRJ-64693]

Standard
Required/Allowed
Min. Lot Size
N/A
Min. Lot Width
N/A
Min. Setbacks
Front (Winwood Street)
N/A
Side
N/A
Corner (Stacey Avenue)
N/A
Rear
N/A
35 Feet
Provided
421,661 SF
479 Feet
Compliance
N/A
N/A
50 Feet
10 Feet
51 Feet
153 Feet
33.3 Feet
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Y
Pursuant to Title 19.08.040, the following residential adjacency standards apply:

Residential Adjacency Standards
Required/Allowed Provided
Compliance
3:1 proximity slope
100 Feet
103 Feet
Y
Pursuant to Title 19.10.020, 19.08.040 and 19.08.110, the following standards apply:
Required
Provided
Standards
Ratio
Trees
Buffer Trees:
North
14 Trees
14 Trees
8 Trees
12 Trees
East
22 Trees
26 Trees
Parking Area Trees
7 Trees
7 Trees
Min. Zone Width
North
15 Feet
28 Feet
East
8 Feet
25 Feet
Existing 6
chain link
fencing along
north and east
Wall Height
PL and
existing CMU
wall along
east PL
Compliance
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
SS
VAR-65224 and SDR-64809 [PRJ-64693]

Street Name
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Stacey Avenue
Local Street
Winwood Street
Local Street
Governing Document
and Highways
and Highways
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Compliance
with Street
Section
51 Feet
57 Feet
Parking Requirement
Required
Provided
Compliance
Gross Floor
Parking
Parking
Area or
Use
Parking
Number of
HandiHandiRatio
Regular
Regular
Units
capped
capped
Public School,
3 spaces
56
Primary
per
70*
classrooms
(Existing)
classroom
Public School,
10
3 spaces
Primary
classrooms
per
30
(Proposed Net
(4 permanent
classroom
Addition)
/6 portable)
100
93
N*
96
4
88
5
N
Percent Deviation
7%
*Pursuant to Title 19.18.030, the site is parking impaired. Only the additional parking spaces
generated by the expansion of use are required.
SS
VAR-65224
VAR-65224
VAR-65224
VAR-65224
VAR-65224
bA7 77
7A7
77A
AA
A7
b
7
7A
7bA
A

7A
A
7Ab

bA
AA
A
A7
7A
7 7 7
b7A77A7A
7Ab
7Ab
7Ab
7Ab
7Ab
7Ab
7Ab
7Ab
7Ab
7Ab
7bA77Ab77A7
7A
bA7b77A7b
77'7A
A7
Abb7A777
A777
A7A77b7Abb7
Abb7A777
7Ab77
A7A7777b7Abb7
77777bA77
A7777
b7b7A7777bA7
Abb7A77
A777
A7A77b7Abb
Abb7A777
7Ab77
777
A7A7777b7Abb7
7777bA77
A777
b7b7A7777bA7
A7
A7AA
b7AA77A77
7bA
A7AA7
77
A7
7bA7A7
7AA77
A7AA7
7Ab
77
A7
7AA77
7AA7 7
b
b
b77
77
A7
7AA
b7A7
7
7b77b7
A7A7AA7
VAR-65224 and SDR-64809
A7A7A

A A A
777A7bA
7
7A7A7A7
b7AAA7
7A7b7b
AA
bA
A7Abb
77A7
A7A7AA7
7
bb7
bb7b7
A7
A7b7
A
bb7
A
b7
A7
7AA77A7A7
bAb
A7A7AA7
A7

77
A7
Ab77A
A7
A
AA
b7
b
7
bA7 77
7A77AA7 7
77A
A7
A77
7A
A7
7bA
A
bA
AA
A
7A
A
7Ab
A7
7A
VAR-65224 and SDR-64809
A7A7A

A A A
AA
bA
7 7 7
bb7
bb7b7
A7
A7b7
bb7
A
A7
7AA77A7A7
b7
A7A7AA7
77
Ab77A
A7
A7
A
VAR-65224 and SDR-64809
bA7 77
77A7
bA7 77
77A7
bA7 77
77A77A7
bA7 77
A77A7
7 7
7 7
7 7
7 7
VAR-65224 and SDR-64809
b77
AAb7b
7Ab
b777Ab
b77
AAb7b
7
b7b
7bA
b7A
777Ab7A
A7bA7A
b7A
77A7
A77A
b7A
7777A7
7 A
b7bA
7A777A
b7A
777A7
b77
AAb7b
7
b7
b77
AAb7b
7
b7A7
bb7
bb7b7
A7
bb7
A
A7
7AA77A7A7
A7A7AA7
77
b7
A7b7
A7
A7
b
A7
A
bA7 77 7
b777A77 77
bA7 77
VAR-65224 and SDR-64809
7 7
7 7
bb7
bb7b7
A7
A7b7
bb7
A
b7
A7
7AA77A7A7
A7A7AA7
77
777A77 77
A7
b
A7
A
VAR-65224 [PRJ-64693] VARIANCE RELATED TO SDR-64809 - APPLICANT/OWNER: SCHOOL BOARD

OF TRUSTEES
5701 STACEY AVENUE
06/30/16

OF TRUSTEES
5701 STACEY AVENUE
06/30/16

OF TRUSTEES
5701 STACEY AVENUE
06/30/16

OF TRUSTEES
5701 STACEY AVENUE
06/30/16

OF TRUSTEES
5701 STACEY AVENUE
06/30/16
VAR-65224 and SDR-64809

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
SDR-64809 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO VAR-65224 - PUBLIC
HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: SCHOOL BOARD OF TRUSTEES - For possible action
on a request for a Major Amendment to a previously approved Plot Plan Review (Z-0053-98)
FOR A PROPOSED 12,120 SQUARE-FOOT EXPANSION TO AN EXISTING 67,973
SQUARE-FOOT PUBLIC SCHOOL, PRIMARY on 9.68 acres at 5701 Stacey Avenue (APN
138-24-202-001), C-V (Civic) Zone, Ward 5 (Barlow) [PRJ-64693]. Staff recommends
DENIAL.
RECOMMENDATION:

paper use, backup
SDR-64809
SDR-64809
SDR-64809
SDR-64809
SDR-64809
SDR 64809
School Board of Trustees
5701 Stacey Avenue

Proposed 12.12 thousand square foot expansion of an existing 67.973 thousand square foot public elementary school.
Existing Use
AM Peak Hour
15.43
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL [1000SF]
67.973
PM Peak Hour
5.20
1.21
1,049
353
82
New Use
AM Peak Hour
15.43
12.12
PM Peak Hour
5.20
1.21
187
63
15
Total Use
AM Peak Hour
15.43
PM Peak Hour
80.093
5.20
1.21
1,236
416
97

Lake Mead Boulevard
22,655
1,812
Jones Boulevard
21,264
1,701

Lake Mead Boulevard
Jones Boulevard

34,500
34,500
This project will add approximately 187 trips per day on Stacey Ave., Winwood St., Lake Mead Blvd. and Jones Blvd. Lake
Mead is currently at about 66 percent of capacity and Jones is at about 62 percent of capacity. After this project, these
capacities are expected to be unchanged. Counts are not available in this vicinity for Stacey or Winwood, but they are
believed to be under capacity.
Based on Peak Hour use, this development will add into the area roughly 63 additional cars, or about one every minute.

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
VAR-65269 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: DR HORTON - OWNER:
GREENGALE PROPERTIES, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO
ALLOW A 77-FOOT LOT WIDTH WHERE 80 FEET IS REQUIRED ON LOT 41 OF A
PROPOSED 95-LOT SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION on 39.18 acres at the
southeast corner of Elkhorn Road and Tenaya Way (APN 125-22-501-001), R-D (Single Family
Residential-Restricted) Zone, Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-65268]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps - VAR-65269, VAR-65277-65285, VAR-65289, VAR-6529165294, VAR-65302-65304, VAR-65306-65311, VAR-65313-65316, VAR-65318-65319, VAR65321, VAR-65326, WVR-65331, WVR-65593 and TMP-65275 [PRJ-65268]
2. Conditions and Staff Report - VAR-65269, VAR-65277-65285, VAR-65289, VAR-6529165294, VAR-65302-65304, VAR-65306-65311, VAR-65313-65316, VAR-65318-65319, VAR65321, VAR-65326, WVR-65331, WVR-65593 and TMP-65275 [PRJ-65268]
3. Supporting Documentation - VAR-65269, VAR-65277-65285, VAR-65289, VAR-6529165294, VAR-65302-65304, VAR-65306-65311, VAR-65313-65316, VAR-65318-65319, VAR65321, VAR-65326, WVR-65331, WVR-65593 and TMP-65275 [PRJ-65268]
4. Photo(s) - VAR-65269, VAR-65277-65285, VAR-65289, VAR-65291-65294, VAR-6530265304, VAR-65306-65311, VAR-65313-65316, VAR-65318-65319, VAR-65321, VAR-65326,
WVR-65331, WVR-65593 and TMP-65275 [PRJ-65268]
5. Justification Letter - VAR-65269, VAR-65277-65285, VAR-65289, VAR-65291-65294,
VAR-65302-65304, VAR-65306-65311, VAR-65313-65316, VAR-65318-65319, VAR-65321,
VAR-65326, WVR-65331, WVR-65593 and TMP-65275 [PRJ-65268]
6. Protest/Support Postcards VAR-65269, VAR-65277 and VAR-65278 [PRJ-65268]
VAR-65269, VAR-65277-65285, VAR-65289, VAR-65291-65294, VAR-65302-65304, VAR65306-65311, VAR-65313-65316, VAR-65318-65319, VAR-65321, VAR-65326, WVR65331, WVR-65593 and TMP-65275 [PRJ-65268]

DEPARTMENT:
PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: DR HORTON - OWNER: GREENGALE
PROPERTIES, LLC
CASE
NUMBER
VAR-65269,
VAR-65277,
VAR-65278,
VAR-65279,
VAR-65280,
VAR-65281,
VAR-65282,
VAR-65283,
VAR-65284,
VAR-65285,
VAR-65289,
VAR-65290,
VAR-65291,
VAR-65292,
VAR-65293,
VAR-65294,
VAR-65302,
VAR-65303,
VAR-65304,
VAR-65306,
VAR-65307,
VAR-65308,
VAR-65309,
VAR-65310,
VAR-65311,
VAR-65311,
VAR-65313,
VAR-65314,
VAR-65315,
VAR-65316,
VAR-65318,
RECOMMENDATION
REQUIRED FOR
APPROVAL

conditions:
.
FS
Notification Page Two
CASE
NUMBER
VAR-65322,
VAR-65326
WVR-65331
RECOMMENDATION
REQUIRED FOR
APPROVAL

conditions:
All related
Variances
WVR-65593

conditions:
All related
Variances
TMP-65275
Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved subject to All related

conditions
Variances, WVR65593, WVR-65593
** NOTIFICATION **
NOTICES MAILED
23 - VAR-65269, VAR-65277-65285,
VAR-65289, VAR-65291-65294,
VAR-65303-65304, VAR-6530665311, VAR-65313-65316,
VAR-65318-65319, VAR-65321,
VAR-65326, WVR-65331, and
TMP-65275
35 VAR-65302 and WVR-65593
242 VAR65296, VAR-65277 and VAR-65278

242 VAR-65279, VAR-65280 and VAR-65281
242 VAR-65282, VAR-65283 and VAR-65284
242 VAR-65285, VAR-65289 and VAR-65291
242 VAR-65292, VAR-65293 and VAR-65294
242 VAR-65302, VAR-65303 and VAR-65304
242 VAR-65306, VAR-65307 and VAR-65308
242 VAR-65309, VAR-65310 and VAR-65311
242 VAR-65313, VAR-65314 and VAR-65315
242 VAR-65316, VAR-65318 and VAR-65319
242 VAR-65321, VAR-65326 and WVR-65331
242 WVR-65593 and TMP-65275
FS
Notification Page Three
APPROVALS
1 VAR65296, VAR-65277 and VAR-65278

1 VAR-65279, VAR-65280 and VAR-65281
1 VAR-65282, VAR-65283 and VAR-65284
1 VAR-65285, VAR-65289 and VAR-65291
1 VAR-65292, VAR-65293 and VAR-65294
1 VAR-65302, VAR-65303 and VAR-65304
1 VAR-65306, VAR-65307 and VAR-65308
1 VAR-65309, VAR-65310 and VAR-65311
1 VAR-65313, VAR-65314 and VAR-65315
1 VAR-65316, VAR-65318 and VAR-65319
1 VAR-65321, VAR-65326 and WVR-65331
2 WVR-65593
1 TMP-65275
PROTESTS
3 VAR65296, VAR-65277 and VAR-65278

3 VAR-65279, VAR-65280 and VAR-65281
3 VAR-65282, VAR-65283 and VAR-65284
3 VAR-65285, VAR-65289 and VAR-65291
3 VAR-65292, VAR-65293 and VAR-65294
3 VAR-65302, VAR-65303 and VAR-65304
3 VAR-65306, VAR-65307 and VAR-65308
3 VAR-65309, VAR-65310 and VAR-65311
3 VAR-65313, VAR-65314 and VAR-65315
3 VAR-65316, VAR-65318 and VAR-65319
4 VAR-65321, VAR-65326 and WVR-65331
3 WVR-65593
4 - TMP-65275
FS
Conditions Page One
** CONDITIONS **
VAR-65269, VAR-65277 THROUGH 65285,

VAR-65289, VAR-65291 THROUGH VAR65294, VAR-65302 THROUGH VAR-65304,
VAR-65306 THROUGH VAR-65311, VAR-65313
THROUGH VAR-65316, VAR-65318, VAR65319, VAR-65321 CONDITIONS
Planning
1.
Conformance to the approved conditions for all related Variance applications, WVR65331, WVR-65593 and TMP-62275.
2.
3.
Safety.
4.
5.
FS
Conditions Page Two
Planning
1.
Conformance to the approved conditions for all related Variance applications, WVR65331, WVR-65593 and TMP-62275
2.
3.
Safety.
4.
5.
Public Works
6.
A Deviation of Standards for roadway cross-section on Elkhorn Road is hereby approved

allowing for a 35-foot wide roadway section from centerline to back-of-curb as depicted in
the approved Tentative Map date stamped 07/28/16.
FS
Planning
1.
This approval shall be void two (2) years from the date of final approval, unless exercised
2.
Safety.
3.
A Waiver from of Title 13.52 to allow above ground power transmission lines where
undergrounding them is required is approved.
4.
5.
6.
Conformance to the approved conditions for all related Variance applications, WVR-65593
and TMP-62275
Public Works
7.
A Variance to allow a non-standard roadway cross-section, such as VAR-65326, must be

approved by City Council.
FS
Planning
1.
This approval shall be void two (2) years from the date of final approval, unless exercised
2.
Safety.
3.
A Waiver from of Title 19.02.240 to allow no street lighting along proposed interior private
streets where such is required is approved.
4.
5.
6.
Conformance to the approved conditions for all related Variance applications, WVR-65331
and TMP-62275.
Planning
1.
FS
2.
Approval of VAR-65269, VAR-65277, VAR-65278, VAR-65279, VAR-65280, VAR65281, VAR-65282, VAR-65283, VAR-65284, VAR-65285, VAR-65289, VAR-65290,
VAR-65291, VAR-65292, VAR-65293, VAR-65294, VAR-65302, VAR-65303, VAR65304, VAR-65306, VAR-65307, VAR-65308, VAR-65309, VAR-65310, VAR-65311,
VAR-65311, VAR-65313, VAR-65314, VAR-65315, VAR-65316, VAR-65318, VAR65319, VAR-65321, VAR-65322, VAR-65326, WVR-65331 and WVR-65593 shall be
required, if approved.
3.
The required street trees (24-inch box 30 feet on-center) along Elkhorn Road are required
even with the approval of the associated perimeter landscape waiver unless written
verification from NV Energy is provided that restricts the installation of landscape in the
vicinity of overhead powerlines. At that time, the applicant shall coordinate with the
Department of Planning prior to approval of civil improvement plans to determine the best
landscaping scheme for the buffer and amenity zones adjacent to Elkhorn Road.
4.
Street names must be provided in accordance with the Citys Street Naming Regulations.
5.
6.
In conjunction with creation, declaration and recordation of the subject common-interest

community, and prior to recordation of the Covenants, Codes and Restrictions (CC&R),
or conveyance of any unit within the community, the Developer is required to record a
Declaration of Private Maintenance Requirements (DPMR) as a covenant on all
associated properties, and on behalf of all current and future property owners. The DPMR
is to include a listing of all privately owned and/or maintained infrastructure improvements,
along with assignment of maintenance responsibility for each to the common interest
community or the respective individual property owners, and is to provide a brief
description of the required level of maintenance for privately maintained components. The
DPMR must be reviewed and approved by the City of Las Vegas Department of Field
Operations prior to recordation, and must include a statement that all properties within the
community are subject to assessment for all associated costs should private maintenance
obligations not be met, and the City of Las Vegas be required to provide for said
maintenance. Also, the CC&R are to include a statement of obligation of compliance with
the DPMR. Following recordation, the Developer is to submit copies of the recorded
DPMR and CC&R documents to the City of Las Vegas Department of Field Operations.
FS
Conditions Page Six
7.
The required street trees (24-inch box 30 feet on-center) along Elkhorn Road are required
even with the approval of the associated perimeter landscape waiver unless written
verification from NV Energy is provided that restricts the installation of landscape in the
vicinity of overhead powerlines. At that time, the applicant shall coordinate with the
Department of Planning prior to approval of civil improvement plans to determine the best
landscaping scheme for the buffer and amenity zones adjacent to Elkhorn Road.
8.
Statutes.
Public Works
9.
The proposed Equestrian Trail shall be privately maintained in perpetuity by the

Homeowners Association.
10.
right-of-way.
11.
Construct half street improvements on Elkhorn Road and Tenaya Way meeting complete
street standards, except as amended by conditions herein, adjacent to this site concurrent
with the development of this site. Additionally, construct the proposed equestrian trail
adjacent to this site along Elkhorn Road concurrent with development of this site. All
location and to its original width concurrent with development of this site. Improvements
on Elkhorn Road may be modified through the approval of VAR-65326 and WVR-65331.
12.
Private streets must be granted and labeled on the Final Map for this site as Public Utility
Easements (P.U.E.), Public Sewer Easements, and Public Drainage Easements to be
privately maintained by the Homeowners Association.
13.
All landscaping and private improvements installed with this project shall be situated and
14.
Sewer connection shall not be allowed to the sewer located in the Rio Vista Street
alignment unless the property owner to the east grants an easement to this site. No
permanent structures or landscaping over 3 feet in height may be within Public Sewer
Easements granted on this site.
FS
Conditions Page Seven
15.
A working sanitary sewer connection shall be in place prior to final inspection of any units
within this development. Full permanent improvements on all major access streets,
including all required landscaped areas between the perimeter wall and adjacent public
street, shall be constructed and accepted by the City prior to issuance of any building
permits beyond 50% of all units within this development. All off-site improvements
adjacent to this site, including all required landscaped areas between the perimeter walls
and adjacent public streets, shall be constructed and accepted prior to issuance of building
permits beyond 75%. The above thresholds notwithstanding, all required Improvements
shall be constructed in accordance with Title19.02.130.D.
16.
Submit an Encroachment Agreement for landscaping and private improvements (including

the portion of the proposed Equestrian Trail within the Elkhorn right-of-way) in the
Elkhorn Road and Tenaya Way public rights-of-way prior to the issuance of permits for
these improvements. The applicant must carry an insurance policy for the term of the
improvements in the public right of way shall be the responsibility of the applicant and any
successors in interest to the property and assigns pursuant to the terms of the Encroachment
17.
18.
As per Unified Development Code (UDC) 19.16.060.G, all requirements must be complied
with or such future compliance must be guaranteed by an approved performance security
method in accordance with UDC sections 19.02.130.C and 19.02.130.E.
FS
Conditions Page Eight
19.
deviations from adopted City Standards shall be allowed unless specific written approval
for such is received from the City Engineer prior to the recordation of a Final Map or the
approval of subdivision-related construction plans, whichever may occur first. Approval of
this Tentative Map does not constitute approval of any deviations. If such approval cannot
be obtained, a revised Tentative Map must be submitted showing elimination of such
deviations.
FS
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The request is for a Tentative Map for a 95-lot residential subdivision located at the southeast
corner of Elkhorn Road and Tenaya Way. Companion items include 30 lot width Variances, two
setback Variances, a connectivity ratio and complete street Variance, a Waiver to allow overhead
transmission lines where they are required to be underground, and a waiver to allow no interior
community streetlights.
ISSUES
30 Lot Width Variances are being requested with this Tentative Map. Staff recommends
denial of the requests.
Two rear setback Variances are being requested for irregularly shaped lots. Staff
recommends denial of the requests.
A Variance has been requested from Title 19.04 to allow a no streetlights, an alternative
primary arterial complete street cross section, and a connectivity ratio of 1.25 where 1.30
is required. Staff recommends denial of the request.
A Waiver from Title 13.52 has been requested to allow overhead power lines where they
are required to be placed underground. The Director of Public works had previously
denied an administrative deviation request and staff recommends denial of this public
hearing waiver request.
A Waiver from Title 19.02 has been requested to allow no interior community streetlights
where they are required for the development. Staff recommends denial of the request.
A Tentative Map has been requested for a 95-lot Single Family Residential subdivision.
Staff recommends denial of the request.
ANALYSIS
The property is zoned R-D (Single Family Residential Restricted District) and the overall
density for the project is 2.42 units per acre, which is in conformance with the 3.49 units per acre
maximum of the R (Rural Density Residential) Master Plan Designation. Access is provided via
drives from Elkhorn Road and Tenaya Way. Adequate perimeter landscape buffering has been
FS
provided as required along both right-of-ways; however, the required street trees are not shown
on the Tentative Map. The street cross sections indicate a landscape buffer area between 10 and
12 feet along the adjacent rights-of-way. A condition of approval has been included to ensure the
installation of the required street trees. An exception of perimeter landscaping has been
requested along Elkhorn Road in the event that Nevada Energy restricts the type of vegetation
that can be installed underneath the power lines.
A multi-use trail alignment runs along the east property line and has been installed as required by
recorded trail easement (Document #200405503). The recorded easement required a 12.5-foot
bladed path to be perpetually maintained in good condition. This section of trail is considered
compete and no additional action will be required on the applicants part.
Thirty Variances have been required for lots do not meet the minimum lot width required within
the R-D (Single Family Residential Restricted District). Due to the method used to determine
lot width for irregular lots, two lots (lots 65 and 78) do not meet rear yard setback requirements
but meet lot width standards. Variances have been requested to provide relief from these
requirements. The applicant has created a self-imposed hardship by proposing more lots than the
R-D (Single Family Residential Restricted) zoned property can support. Reducing the number
of proposed lots would allow for conformance to the existing zoning requirements. It should
also be noted that the developer asked for, and was granted approval of, the R-D (Single Family
Residential Restricted) District at the 06/15/16 City Council Meeting. A Rezoning request to
the R-1 (Single Family Residential) or other less restrictive zoning district would have been more
appropriate, given the expected housing product, as opposed to subsequently requesting a lot
width Variance for approximately one-third of the proposed lots. Given that there is no evidence
of a hardship, staff recommends denial of all the lot width and setback Variance requests.
A Variance (VAR-65326) has been requested to allow an alternative street cross section along
Elkhorn Road where a 106-foot primary arterial street section is required. The proposed Elkhorn
section includes no streetlights and a design that is not consistent with Title 19.04 requirements,
including the installation of an equestrian trial outside of the established 2020 Master Plan
recreation trail network. The equestrian trail, if installed, will essentially dead end at the
Tenaya/Elkhorn intersection, as the surrounding developments across the street are built to a
more suburban standard. Adjacent street improvements are typical for a 100-foot primary
arterial and include amenities such as curb, gutter, and a five-foot sidewalk. The alternate street
cross section is not appropriate for this site, as it is unlikely that future development to the east
will continue with the proposed street section and it will cause inconsistencies in streetscapes. In
addition, installing a horse trail outside of the recreation trail network outlined in the 2020
Master Plan Trails Element is not advisable and could result in auto, equine and pedestrian
conflicts along this 100-foot primary arterial. Staff recommends denial of this Variance requests
and recommends installation of the correct Complete Street cross section identified in Title
19.04.
FS
Also associated with VAR-65326 is a request for a connectivity ratio of 1.25 where 1.30 is
required and the proposal of no streetlights along Elkhorn Road and Tenaya Way. Streetlights
are recommended for public safety along primary arterials and major collector streets. The
applicant has created a self-imposed hardship by deigning the interior street network to not meet
the minimum 1.3 connectivity ratio. Alternative design would allow conformance to the Title 19
requirements and therefore staff recommends denial on these requests as well.
A Waiver (WVR-65331) from Title 13.52 has been requested to allow the existing overhead
power lines to remain where they are required to be relocated underground. The applicant had
made an administrative waiver request to the Director of Public Works which was denied on
07/21/16. Reasons given for denial include the fact that adjacent developments were required to
underground the existing powerlines as a condition of their community approval, that the
powerlines detract from the quality of the community, and that the powerlines interfere with
installation and maintenance of City street lighting. With the denial of the administrative
request, the request is required to be heard at public hearing. The Department of Planning
concurs with the Public Works Directors assessment, and adds that the undergrounding of the
power lines will allow for the proper street trees along Elkhorn Road. If the lines are allowed to
remain, NV Energy typically places restrictions on types of landscaping placed beneath power
poles and the street trees will likely not be installed. Staff recommends denial of this request.
A Waiver (WVR-65593) has been requested to allow no interior streetlights where they are
required for the development. This community is located at an intersection of a Primary Arterial
and a Major Collector Street. The adjacent development at the corners of this intersection are
suburban in nature, and there is no justification to not install interior community streetlights for
the proposed development. Staff recommends denial of this request.
FINDINGS (VAR-65269, VAR-65277 THROUGH 65285, VAR-65289, VAR-65291

THROUGH VAR-65294, VAR-65302 THROUGH VAR-65304, VAR-65306 THROUGH
VAR-65311, VAR-65313 THROUGH VAR-65316, VAR-65318, VAR-65319, VAR-65321)
1.
2.
3.

FS

resolution.
has created a self-imposed hardship by proposing more lots that than the R-D (Single Family
Residential Restricted) District zoned property can support. Reducing the number of proposed
lots would allow for conformance to the existing zoning requirements. It should be noted that
the developer asked for, and was granted approval of, R-D zoning at the 06/15/16 City Council
Meeting. A Rezoning request to the R-1 (Single Family Residential) or other less restrictive
zoning district would have been more appropriate given the expected housing product, as
opposed to subsequently requesting a lot width Variance for approximately one-third of the
proposed lots. In view of the absence of any hardships imposed by the sites physical
characteristics, it is concluded that the applicants hardship is preferential in nature, and it is
thereby outside the realm of NRS Chapter 278 for granting of Variances.
There are 30 lot width Variances associated with the Tentative Map request. The table below
summarizes the requests.
Case
Number
VAR-65269
VAR-65277
VAR-65278
VAR-65279
VAR-65280
VAR-65281
VAR-65282
VAR-65283
VAR-65284
VAR-65285
VAR-65289
Lot
Number
41
43
38
45
36
47
34
32
49
40
30
Proposed Lot
Width in feet
77 feet
73 feet
73 feet
73 feet
73 feet
73 feet
73 feet
73 feet
73 feet
77 feet
77 feet
Required Lot
Width
80 feet
80 feet
80 feet
80 feet
80 feet
80 feet
80 feet
80 feet
80 feet
80 feet
80 feet
Denial
Denial
Denial
Denial
Denial
Denial
Denial
Denial
Denial
Denial
Denial
FS
Case
Number
VAR-65290
VAR-65291
VAR-65292
VAR-65293
VAR-65294
VAR-65302
VAR-65303
VAR-65304
VAR-65306
VAR-65307
VAR-65308
VAR-65309
VAR-65310
VAR-65311
VAR-65313
VAR-65314
VAR-65315
VAR-65316
VAR-65318
Lot
Number
28
26
25
23
21
66
68
70
72
74
76
77
81
83
84
86
87
89
79
Proposed Lot
Width in feet
75 feet
75 feet
75 feet
75 feet
78 feet
73 feet
73 feet
73 feet
73 feet
73 feet
73 feet
73 feet
73 feet
73 feet
73 feet
73 feet
73 feet
73 feet
75 feet
Required Lot
Width
80 feet
80 feet
80 feet
80 feet
80 feet
80 feet
80 feet
80 feet
80 feet
80 feet
80 feet
80 feet
80 feet
80 feet
80 feet
80 feet
80 feet
80 feet
80 feet
Denial
Denial
Denial
Denial
Denial
Denial
Denial
Denial
Denial
Denial
Denial
Denial
Denial
Denial
Denial
Denial
Denial
Denial
Denial
In addition, there are two rear setback Variances being requested as Lots 65 and 78 are
irregularly shaped. The table below summarizes the Variance requests:
FINDINGS (VAR-65321 and VAR-65319)

1.
2.
3.


FS
resolution.
has created a self-imposed hardship by proposing more lots than the R-D (Single Family
Residential Restricted District) zoned property can support. These two setback requests were
initially for lot width, but because of the irregular shapes of the two lots, Title 19 calls for a
different method of calculating the orientation of the lot. As such, these two lots ended up
becoming rear setback Variances. Reducing the number of proposed lots or rezoning to a less
restrictive district would allow for conformance to the existing zoning requirements. In view of
the absence of any hardships imposed by the sites physical characteristics, it is concluded that
the applicants hardship is preferential in nature, and it is thereby outside the realm of NRS
Chapter 278 for granting of Variances.
Case Number
Lot Number
VAR-65319
VAR-65321
65
78
Requested Rear Required Rear Staff

Setback
Setback
Recommendation
10 feet
30 feet
Denial
10 feet
30 feet
Denial
1.
2.
3.


FS
resolution.
has created a self-imposed hardship by proposing no streetlights, a street cross section adjacent
to Elkhorn Road not consistent with Title 19.04 Complete Street standards, and by designing the
interior street network to not meet the minimum 1.3 Connectivity Ratio. Alternative design
would allow conformance to the Title 19 requirements. In view of the absence of any hardships
imposed by the sites physical characteristics, it is concluded that the applicants hardship is
preferential in nature, and it is thereby outside the realm of NRS Chapter 278 for granting of
Variances.
The applicant had made an administrative waiver request to the Director of Public Works which
was denied on 07/21/16. Reasons given for denial include the fact that adjacent developments
were required to underground the existing powerlines as a condition of their community
approval, that the powerlines detracts from the quality of the community, and that the powerlines
interfere with installation and maintenance of City street lighting. With the denial of the
administrative request, the request is required to be heard at public hearing. The Department of
Planning concurs with the Directors assessment and recommends denial of this request.
A Waiver has been requested to allow no interior streetlights where they are required for the
development. This community is located at an intersection of a Primary Arterial and a Major
Collector Street. The adjacent development at the corners of this intersection are suburban in
nature, and there is no justification to not install interior community streetlights for the proposed
development. Staff recommends denial of this request.
The City Council approved a General Plan Amendment (GPA-63487) from
DR (Desert Rural Density Residential) to R (Rural Density Residential) and a
06/15/16
Rezoning (ZON-63488) from U (Undeveloped) to R-D (Single Family
Residential Restricted District). Staff and the Planning Commission had
FS

02/29/00
A pre-application meeting was held and items discussed included the need for
lot width Variances, undergrounding of the overhead utility lines, the required
05/25/16
improvements along Elkhorn Road, the required Multi-use trail, and noncompliance with complete street and connectivity standards.
The applicant held a voluntary neighborhood meeting at the Centennial Hills
07/26/16
YMCA.
Field Check
06/30/16
The site is undeveloped.

Site Area
Gross Acres
39.18
Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12
Planned or Special
Subject Property
Undeveloped
R (Rural Density
Residential)
North
Single Family,
Detached
South
Single Family,
Detached
East
Undeveloped
West
Single Family,
Detached
RNP (Rural
Neighborhood
Preservation)
DR (Desert Rural
Residential)
RNP (Rural
Neighborhood
Preservation) - Clark
County
DR (Desert Rural
Residential)

R-D (Single Family
Residential Restricted
District)
R-PD2 (Residential
units per acre)
U (Undeveloped)
R-A (Rural Agricultural) Clark County
R-PD2 (Residential
units per acre)
FS
Master Plan Areas

Compliance
N/A
Compliance
N/A
Compliance
Trails
Y
N/A
N/A
N/A
A Multi-use Transportation Trail is required along the east property line and has been installed
through a previous action.
Standard
Required/Allowed
Provided
Compliance
Min. Lot Size
10,000 SF
10,045 SF
Y
Min. Lot Width
80 Feet
73 Feet
N
Min. Setbacks
Front
25 Feet
25 Feet
Y
Side
5 Feet
5 Feet
Y
Corner
15 Feet
15 Feet
Y
30 Feet
10 Feet
N
Rear
2 stories
2 stories
Y
30 lots do not meet the minimum lot width required within the R-D (Single Family Residential
Restricted District). Due to the method used to determine lot width for irregular lots, two lots
(Lots 65 and 78) do not meet rear yard setback requirements. Variances have been requested to
provide relief from these requirements.
General Plan
R (Rural Density Residential)
Permitted Density
3.59
Units Allowed
141
FS

Required
Provided
Compliance
Standards
Ratio
Trees
Buffer Trees:
North
40 Trees
Not Shown
N
40 Trees
Not Shown
N
West
80 Trees
Not Shown
N
Min. Zone Width
North
6 Feet
10 Feet
Y
6 Feet
12 Feet
Y
West
The required street trees are not shown on the Tentative Map. A condition of approval has been
included to ensure compliance with this requirement. A waiver of perimeter landscaping has
been requested along Elkhorn Road in the event that Nevada Energy restricts the type of
vegetation that can be installed underneath the power lines. The street cross sections indicate a
landscape buffer area between 10 and 12 feet along the adjacent right-of-ways.
Street Name
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Governing Document
Tenaya Way
Major Collector
Planned Streets and

Highways Map
Elkhorn Road
Primary Arterial
Planned Streets and

Highways Map
19.04.040 Connectivity
Transportation Network Element
Internal Street
Intersection Internal
Cul-de-sac Terminus
Intersection External Street or Stub Terminus
Intersection Stub Terminus w/ Temporary Turn Around
Easements
Non-Vehicular Path - Unrestricted
Total
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Compliance
with Street
Section
80 feet.
105 feet.
# Links
11
0
0
0
# Nodes
0
10
2
2
0
11
0
14
FS
Connectivity Ratio (Links / Nodes):
Required
Provided
1.30
1.27
The subdivision does not meet the minimum required Connectivity Ratio and a Variance has
been requested to provide relief from this requirement.
Provided
Compliance
Three-foot amenity
zone back of curb with
Tenaya Way
Y
a detached five foot
sidewalk.
Five-foot amenity zone,
five-foot detached
Three-foot amenity zone
sidewalk, a 10-foot
back of curb with a
Elkhorn Road
equestrian trail
N
detached five foot
separated from the
sidewalk.
sidewalk with a split
rail fence.
The Elkhorn section includes amenities in excess of Title 19.04 requirements. The installation of
an equestrian trial for this site is not necessary and future development providing continuity with
this street section for future development adjacent to Elkhorn Road is not likely.
Exception
Requirement
Street trees planted 30 feet oncenter along Elkhorn Road
Required
Three-foot amenity zone
back of curb with a
detached five foot
sidewalk.
Request
Street trees planted 30
feet on-center along
Elkhorn Road, unless
NV Energy restricts
trees from being
planted underneath the
power transition lines.
Denial
FS
Waivers
Requirement
Underground overhead
powerlines.
Require street lights interior to
the subdivision.
Request
To allow overhead
power lines where they
are required to be
underground.
To allow no streetlights
within the subdivision.
Denial
Denial
Staff recommends that all overhead transmission lines be relocated underground, and as such,
recommends denial of the landscape exception request. A condition has been added that in the
event the Waiver to allow overhead transmission lines is approved that the applicant will still be
required to add the required street trees unless they provide verification from NV Energy that the
required trees are not permitted. The suburban nature of the surrounding area is not conducive to
having this subdivision not install streetlights.
FS
VAR-65269
VAR-65269
VAR-65269, VAR-65277-65285, VAR-65289, VAR-65291-65294, VAR-65302-65304, VAR-65306-65311, VAR-65313-65316,

VAR-65318-65319, VAR-65321, VAR-65326, WVR-65331, WVR-65593 and TMP-65268
VAR-65269, VAR-65277-65285, VAR-65289, VAR-65291-65294,

VAR-65302-65304, VAR-65306-65311, VAR-65313-65316,
VAR-65318-65319, VAR-65321, VAR-65326, WVR-65331,
WVR-65593 and TMP-65268 - REVISED
VAR-65269, VAR-65277 THROUGH VAR-65285, VAR-65289, VAR-65291 THROUGH VAR-65294, VAR65302 THROUGH VAR-65304, VAR-65306 THROUGH VAR-65311, VAR-65313 THROUGH VAR-65316,
VAR-65318, VAR-65319, VAR-65321, VAR-65326, WVR-65331, WVR-65593 AND TMP-65275 [PRJ65268] - VARIANCE - APPLICANT: DR HORTON - OWNER: GREENGALE PROPERTIES, LLC
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ELKHORN ROAD AND TENAYA WAY
06/30/16
06/30/16
06/30/16
VAR-65269, VAR-65277-65285, VAR-65289, VAR-65291-65294,

VAR-65302-65304, VAR-65306-65311, VAR-65313-65316,
VAR-65318-65319, VAR-65321, VAR-65326, WVR-65331 and TMP-65275
[PRJ-65268]

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
RECOMMENDATION:

paper use, backup
VAR-65277
VAR-65277

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
RECOMMENDATION:

paper use, backup
VAR-65278
VAR-65278

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
RECOMMENDATION:

paper use, backup
VAR-65279
VAR-65279

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
RECOMMENDATION:

paper use, backup
VAR-65280
VAR-65280

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
RECOMMENDATION:

paper use, backup
VAR-65281
VAR-65281

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
RECOMMENDATION:

paper use, backup
VAR-65282
VAR-65282

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
RECOMMENDATION:

paper use, backup
VAR-65283
VAR-65283

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
RECOMMENDATION:

paper use, backup
VAR-65284
VAR-65284

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
RECOMMENDATION:

paper use, backup
VAR-65285
VAR-65285

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
southeast corner of Elkhorn Road and Tenaya Way(APN 125-22-501-001), R-D (Single Family
RECOMMENDATION:

paper use, backup
VAR-65289
VAR-65289

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
RECOMMENDATION:

paper use, backup
VAR-65291
VAR-65291

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
RECOMMENDATION:

paper use, backup
VAR-65292
VAR-65292

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
RECOMMENDATION:

paper use, backup
VAR-65293
VAR-65293

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
RECOMMENDATION:

paper use, backup
VAR-65294
VAR-65294

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
RECOMMENDATION:
3. Protest/Support Postcards for VAR-65302, VAR-65303 and VAR-65304 [PRJ-65268]

paper use, backup
VAR-65302
VAR-65302

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
RECOMMENDATION:

paper use, backup
VAR-65303
VAR-65303

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
RECOMMENDATION:
DENIAL

paper use, backup
VAR-65304
VAR-65304

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
RECOMMENDATION:

paper use, backup
VAR-65306
VAR-65306

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
RECOMMENDATION:

paper use, backup
VAR-65307
VAR-65307

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
RECOMMENDATION:

paper use, backup
VAR-65308
VAR-65308

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
Residential-Restricted) Zone, Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-65268]. Staff recommend DENIAL.
RECOMMENDATION:

paper use, backup
VAR-65309
VAR-65309

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
RECOMMENDATION:

paper use, backup
VAR-65310
VAR-65310

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
RECOMMENDATION:

paper use, backup
VAR-65311
VAR-65311

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
RECOMMENDATION:

paper use, backup
VAR-65313
VAR-65313

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
RECOMMENDATION:

paper use, backup
VAR-65314
VAR-65314

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
RECOMMENDATION:

paper use, backup
VAR-65315
VAR-65315

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
RECOMMENDATION:

paper use, backup
VAR-65316
VAR-65316

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
RECOMMENDATION:

paper use, backup
VAR-65318
VAR-65318

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
ALLOW A 10-FOOT REAR YARD SETBACK WHERE 30 FEET IS REQUIRED ON LOT 65
OF A PROPOSED 95-LOT SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION on 39.18 acres
at the southeast corner of Elkhorn Road and Tenaya Way (APN 125-22-501-001), R-D (Single
Family Residential-Restricted) Zone, Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-65268]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
RECOMMENDATION:

paper use, backup
VAR-65319
VAR-65319

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
ALLOW A NINE-FOOT REAR YARD SETBACK WHERE 30 FEET IS REQUIRED ON LOT
78 OF A PROPOSED 95-LOT SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION on 39.18
acres at the southeast corner of Elkhorn Road and Tenaya Way (APN 125-22-501-001), R-D
(Single Family Residential-Restricted) Zone, Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-65268]. Staff recommends
DENIAL.
RECOMMENDATION:
3. Protest/Support Postcards for VAR-65321, VAR-65326 and WVR-65331 [PRJ-65268]

paper use, backup
VAR-65321
VAR-65321

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
ALLOW NO ADDITIONAL OFFSITE IMPROVEMENTS WHERE COMPLETE STREETS
STANDARDS REQUIRE A FIVE-FOOT SIDEWALK, A FIVE-FOOT AMENITY ZONE
AND OTHER AMENITIES ALONG ELKHORN ROAD AND TO ALLOW A
CONNECTIVITY RATIO OF 1.25 WHERE 1.30 IS THE MINIMUM REQUIRED on 39.18
acres at the southeast corner of Elkhorn Road and Tenaya Way (APN 125-22-501-001), R-D
(Single Family Residential-Restricted) Zone, Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-65268]. Staff recommends
DENIAL.
RECOMMENDATION:

paper use, backup
VAR-65326
VAR-65326

PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: SEPTEMBER 21, 2016
DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
WVR-65331 - WAIVER - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: DR HORTON - OWNER:
GREENGALE PROPERTIES, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Waiver FROM
LVMC 13.52 TO ALLOW OVERHEAD TRANSMISSION LINES WHERE
UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE REQUIRED on 39.18 acres at the southeast corner of
Elkhorn Road and Tenaya Way (APN 125-22-501-001), R-D (Single Family ResidentialRestricted) Zone, Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-65268]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
RECOMMENDATION:

paper use, backup
WVR-65331
WVR-65331

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
WVR-65593 - WAIVER - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: DR HORTON - OWNER:
GREENGALE PROPERTIES, LLC - For possible action on a request TO ALLOW NO
STREETLIGHTS FOR ALL INTERIOR STREETS WHERE STREETLIGHTS ARE
REQUIRED on 39.18 acres at the southeast corner of Elkhorn Road and Tenaya Way (APN 12522-501-001), R-D (Single Family Residential-Restricted) Zone, Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-65268].
RECOMMENDATION:
3. Protest/Support Postcards WVR-65593 and TMP-65275 [PRJ-65268]

paper use, backup
WVR-65593
WVR-65593

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
TMP-65275 - TENTATIVE MAP RELATED TO VAR-65269, VAR-65277 THROUGH 65285,
VAR-65289, VAR-65291 THROUGH VAR-65294, VAR-65302 THROUGH VAR-65304,
VAR-65306 THROUGH VAR-65311, VAR-65313 THROUGH VAR-65316, VAR-65318,
VAR-65319, VAR-65321, VAR-65326, WVR-65331 AND WVR-65593 - ELKHORN 40 PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: DR HORTON - OWNER: GREENGALE PROPERTIES,
LLC - For possible action on a request for a Tentative Map FOR A 95-LOT SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION on 39.18 acres at the southeast corner of Elkhorn Road and
Tenaya Way (APN 125-22-501-001), R-D (Single Family Residential-Restricted) Zone, Ward 6
(Ross) [PRJ-65268]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
RECOMMENDATION:

paper use, backup
TMP-65275
TMP-65275
TMP-65275 - REVISED
TMP-65275 - REVISED
TMP-65275 - REVISED
TMP-65275 - REVISED
TMP-65275 - REVISED
TMP-65275 - REVISED
TMP-65275
TMP 65275
DR Horton
SEC Elkhorn Road & Tenaya Way

Proposed 95 single family unit residential development.
Proposed Use
AM Peak Hour
9.57
SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED [DWELL]
PM Peak Hour
95
0.75
1.01
909
71
96

Elkhorn Road
6,698
536
Tenaya Way
8,132
651

Elkhorn Road
Tenaya Way

25,400
34,500
This project will add approximately 909 trips per day on Elkhorn Rd. and Tenaya Wy. Elkhorn is currently at about 26
percent of capacity and Tenaya is at about 24 percent of capacity. After this project, Elkhorn is expected to be at about 30
percent of capacity and Tenaya to be at about 26 percent of capacity.
Based on Peak Hour use, this development will add into the area roughly 96 additional cars, or about three every two
minutes.

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
VAR-65380 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: JOSE PICHARDO
- For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW 20 PARKING SPACES WHERE
29 SPACES ARE REQUIRED on 0.24 acres on the east side of 10th Street, approximately 50
feet north of Garces Avenue (APN 139-34-801-012), R-3 (Medium Density Residential) Zone,
Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-65295]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Abeyance Request Letter - VAR-65380, SUP-65379 and SDR-65382 [PRJ-65295].pdf
2. Location and Aerial Maps - VAR-65380, SUP-65379 and SDR-65382 [PRJ-65295]
3. Conditions and Staff Report - VAR-65380, SUP-65379 and SDR-65382 [PRJ-65295]
4. Supporting Documentation - VAR-65380, SUP-65379 and SDR-65382 [PRJ-65295]
5. Photo(s) - VAR-65380, SUP-65379 and SDR-65382 [PRJ-65295]
6. Justification Letter - VAR-65380, SUP-65379 and SDR-65382 [PRJ-65295]
7. Action Letter for SDR-59513 - VAR-65380, SUP-65379 and SDR-65382 [PRJ-65295]
8. Protest/Support Postcards VAR-65380 and SUP-65379 and Support Phone Log - VAR65380, SUP-65379 and SDR-65382 [PRJ-65295]
VAR-65380, SUP-65379 and SDR-65382 [PRJ-65295]

DEPARTMENT:
PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: JOSE PICHARDO
CASE
NUMBER
VAR-65380
SUP-65379
SDR-65382
RECOMMENDATION
conditions:
conditions:
conditions:
REQUIRED FOR
APPROVAL
VAR-65380
VAR-65380
SUP-65379
** NOTIFICATION **
40
NOTICES MAILED
247 VAR-65380 and SUP-65379

247 SDR-65382
APPROVALS
2 VAR-65380 and SUP-65379

1 SDR-65382
PROTESTS
1 VAR-65380 and SUP-65379

1 SDR-65382
SS

Conditions Page One
** CONDITIONS **
Planning
1.
Approval of and conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Special Use Permit (SUP65379) and Site Development Plan Review (SDR-65382) shall be required, if approved.
2.
3.
Safety.
4.
5.
Planning
1.
Conformance to all Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.12 for a Mixed Use
Development.
2.
Approval of and conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Variance (Var-65380) and
Site Development Plan Review (SDR-65382) shall be required.
SS

Conditions Page Two
3.
4.
Safety.
5.
6.
Planning
1.
Approval of and conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Variance (VAR-65380)

and Special Use Permit (SUP-65379) shall be required, if approved.
2.
This approval is a major amendment to, and shall run concurrently with, Site Development
Plan Review (SDR-59513). No further action is needed, as the amendment is extended,
exercised or expired with SDR-59513.
3.
All development shall be in conformance with the site plan date stamped 06/23/16,
landscape plan date stamped 06/27/16, building elevations date stamped 06/23/16 and
07/05/16 and floor plans date stamped 06/23/16, except as amended by conditions herein.
4.
A Waiver from Title 19.06.110 is hereby approved, to allow a zero-foot perimeter

landscape buffer along the west property line where six feet is required.
5.
Safety.
6.
SS

7.

8.
9.
Public Works
10.
to this site on 10th Street in accordance with code requirements of Title 13.56.040, if any,
to the satisfaction of the City Engineer concurrent with development of this site.
11.
Remove all substandard alley improvements concurrent with the development of this site.
All existing paving damaged or removed by this development shall be restored at its
original location and to its original width concurrent with development of this site. A
geotechnical soils report shall be submitted concurrent with the submittal of off-site
construction drawings for the site and shall be approved prior to the issuance of any offsite
permits.
12.
Landscape and maintain all unimproved rights-of-way, if any, adjacent to this site. All
landscaping and private improvements installed with this project shall be situated and
13.
discuss fire requirements for the proposed use of this facility. The design and layout of all
onsite private circulation and access drives shall meet the approval of the Department of
Fire Services.
SS

14.
Submit an Encroachment Agreement for landscaping and private improvements in the 10th
Street public right-of-way prior to this issuance of permits for these improvements. The
applicant must carry an insurance policy for the term of the Encroachment Agreement and
add the City of Las Vegas as an additionally insured entity on this insurance policy. If
requested by the City, the applicant shall remove property encroaching in the public rightof way at the applicant's expense pursuant to the terms of the City's Encroachment
Agreement. The installation and maintenance of all private improvements in the public
right of way shall be the responsibility of the adjacent property owner(s) and shall be
transferred with the sale of the property for the entire term of the Encroachment
15.
establishing finished floor elevations and drainage patterns for this site prior to submittal of
construction plans or the issuance of any building or grading permits, whichever may occur
SS

** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is requesting to modify the previous approval for a three-story apartment building
on this site to add eight additional units on upper levels and a small commercial tenant space at
the ground level. Several two-bedroom units would be split into studio and one-bedroom units,
but the footprint of the building would remain as approved. The addition of the commercial
space would transform this apartment project into a mixed-use development. No additional
parking is proposed.
ISSUES
The Mixed-Use use is permitted in the R-3 (Medium Density Residential) zoning district
with the approval of a Special Use Permit.
The R-3 zoning district allows up to 50 dwelling units per acre. The proposed eight-unit
addition would increase this development to 75 units per acre, which is incompatible with
this district. This development cannot be approved with the number of units as proposed.
A Variance is needed to allow 20 parking spaces where 29 spaces are required as a result of
adding residential units and a commercial tenant space. The Variance triggers a Major
Amendment of the approved Site Development Plan Review for a 10-unit multi-family
residential development. Staff does not support this request.
A new waiver of perimeter landscaping would be needed to allow the area in front of the
proposed caf to be hardscaped. A minimum buffer width of six feet was approved in the
original entitlement; this request would reduce the buffer to zero feet along a portion of the
west property line.
The commercial tenant space must conform to all building code requirements at the time of
building permit review, including the incorporation of standards for handicap accessibility.
ANALYSIS
The site is subject to Title 19.12 requirements for mixed use developments, Title 19.06
requirements for R-3 zoned properties and Title 19.18.030 mixed use parking requirements (at
the option of the applicant). The R-3 District allows up to 50 dwelling units per acre. The
maximum number of units that are allowed on this parcel given this ratio is 12. With the eight
units proposed as part of this request, the development would exceed this zoning standard.
Therefore, unless at least six units are removed from the building, this request cannot be
approved, nor can the density ratio be varied.
SS

Title 19 parking requirements cannot be met by the proposal; thus, a variance is required. As
this is a mixed use development, the applicant may opt to use the 19.18.030 mixed use parking
requirement or offer an alternative parking standard endorsed by a licensed engineer through a
special use permit. The applicant has chosen to use the parking standard for each use as required
by Title 19.
The Mixed-Use use is defined as, the vertical integration of residential uses and commercial or
civic uses within a single building or a single development, where the uses share pedestrian
access, vehicular access, parking functions, or any combination thereof. The proposed use
meets the definition, as the applicant is requesting to incorporate a 140 square-foot take-out
restaurant space on the ground floor of an approved multi-family residential development.
Parking is provided for both uses on the ground floor underneath the residential units. MixedUse is permitted in the R-3 zoning district with a Special Use Permit
This requirement does not apply, as the property is located within the R-3 zoning
district, where residential uses are already permitted as of right.
2. Nonresidential uses permitted as of right in the P-O, O and C-1 Zoning Districts may
be permitted by means of a Special Use Permit within an R-3 or R-4 Zoning District.
The proposed use meets this requirement, as a Special Use Permit is requested for a
proposed 140 square-foot commercial tenant space in the R-3 zoning district.
3. Commercial uses or civic uses shall at a minimum be located at the ground level
fronting the primary public rights-of-way and may extend beyond the ground floor.
The principal entryway to access those uses, whether individually or collectively,
shall be directly accessed from and oriented to the public sidewalk.
The proposed use meets this requirement, as the proposed commercial tenant space
would be located at the ground level oriented toward and with direct access from
10th Street.
that is located at the interior of the development site and does not front on an arterial
or collector street.
SS

The proposed use meets this requirement, as all multi-family residential units would
be located on the second and third levels of the proposed building.
5. Surface parking lots shall be located to the side or the rear of the principal building(s)
on the site, and shall be screened from view of the adjacent rights-of-way by the
principal building(s) or a landscape buffer in conformance with the requirements of
LVMC Chapter 19.08. Parking structures shall not be located along the street
frontages of the development site, but shall be screened from view of the adjacent
rights-of-way by the principal building(s).
The proposed use meets this requirement, as access to the covered ground level
parking area would be from the rear alley. The side facing public right-of-way would
not be exposed.
The proposed 140 square-foot restaurant would provide walk-up service only (no indoor
seating/waiting area) serving only prepared food and drinks. Access to restroom facilities is
shown on the exterior of the building, facing south. Staff notes that the door must be designed to
move inward and cannot encroach into the side yard setback on the south side of the building. In
addition, the restroom facilities must conform to all building code requirements at the time of
building permit review, including the incorporation of standards for handicap accessibility.
Other than the addition of units on the third floor and the reduction of the west side perimeter
landscape buffer in order to provide an outdoor dining area, there are no changes to the building
configuration or site layout. The R-3 District allows for a maximum of 12 units on this site as a
result of the existing lot area. The proposed number of units cannot be approved. Additionally,
because the additional units trigger the need for a parking variance that is self-created by the
applicant, the development is not compatible with the adjacent offices, many of which are
already tight on parking and depend on offsite spaces along 10th Street. Staff therefore
recommends denial, with conditions if approved.
The Las Vegas Valley Water District notes that this parcel is currently served by LVVWD from
the alley on the east side of the parcel. The proposed development will require at least one large
above-ground backflow prevention assembly that cannot be placed in the alley, below ground or
inside of a room. The applicant is advised to revise the site plan to provide a setback adjacent to
the water main to allow for the above-ground water facilities outside of the public right-of-way.
SS

1.
2.
3.


resolution.
has created a self-imposed hardship by proposing additional units that increases the parking
requirement beyond what the site can provide. Leaving the number of units at 10 would allow
conformance to the Title 19 requirements. In view of the absence of any hardships imposed by
the sites physical characteristics, it is concluded that the applicants hardship is preferential in
nature, and it is thereby outside the realm of NRS Chapter 278 for granting of Variances.
1.
A Mixed-Use development on this site would be compatible with the adjacent professional
office uses in the vicinity; however, this site lacks the capacity to provide sufficient onsite
parking facilities to handle the increased number of residential units proposed, which can
cause potential issues with offsite parking. Therefore, this particular use cannot be
conducted in a manner that is harmonious and compatible with the surrounding land uses.
2.
With the number of residential units proposed, the site cannot accommodate the requisite
number of parking spaces.
SS

3.
Access to the property is provided by 10th Street, an 80-foot right-of-way, and a 20-foot
rear alley. Both are adequate in size to meet the requirements of the proposed Mixed-Use
development.
4.
General Plan.
The proposed uses onsite will be subject to licensing requirements and inspections if
approved, thereby safeguarding the public health, safety and welfare.
5.
All Minimum Special Use Permit Requirements for the Mixed-Use use are satisfied by the
proposed use.
1.

The subject site lacks the capacity to provide sufficient onsite parking facilities to handle
the increased number of residential units proposed. Additionally, the number of additional
units proposed would exceed the maximum allowable density of the R-3 zoning district,
making the development incompatible with the adjacent R-3 and P-O zoned parcels.
2.
The development cannot be approved with 18 units as proposed, as the maximum density
allowance in the R-3 District is 50 dwelling units per acre. The proposed increase in
residential units triggers a parking variance, which staff does not support. The proposed
restroom facility associated with the commercial area will need to be designed according
to handicap-accessible building codes.
SS

3.

The site is accessed from 10th Street, an 80-foot public right-of-way that is sufficient in
size to carry the minimal amount of traffic this proposed development will generate.
4.
The project design and style are appropriate for the subject location and will be
harmonious with buildings in the surrounding area. The submitted building elevations
indicate the building faades will have a light grey stucco finish, with 24-inch dark wood
tile pop out architectural embellishments. The primary tree species being utilized are the
24 box Mexican Fan Palm, 24 box Mediterranean Fan Palm, 24 box Pom Pom Olive
and 15-gallon African Sumac trees, which are consistent with the Southern Nevada
Regional Plan Coalition Regional Plant List.
5.

The design characteristics of the proposed building elevations are not unsightly and are
compatible with existing development in the area.
6.
general welfare.
The proposed mixed-use development will be subject to permitting and inspections in
order to protect the public health, safety and general welfare.
SS

The City Council approved a Rezoning (ZON-59511) from R-1 (Single
Family Residential) to R-3 (Medium Density Residential) on 0.24 acres on the
east side of 10th Street, 50 feet north of Garces Avenue. The Planning
The City Council approved a Variance (VAR-59512) to allow a six-foot front
yard setback where 10 feet is required on 0.24 acres on the east side of 10th
Street, 50 feet north of Garces Avenue. The Planning Commission and staff
08/19/15
The City Council approved a Site Development Plan Review (SDR-59513)
for a proposed 10-unit, three-story multi-family residential building with
waivers to allow a six-foot landscape buffer along a portion of the west
perimeter where ten feet is the minimum required and a zero-foot buffer along
a portion of the east perimeter where six feet is the minimum required on 0.24
acres on the east side of 10th Street, 50 feet north of Garces Avenue. The
Planning Commission and staff recommended approval.
A Final Map (FMP-61271) to revert three subdivided lots on 0.24 acres to
11/25/15
acreage on the east side of 10th Street, 50 feet north of Garces Avenue was
recorded.

08/30/13

Civil Improvement Plans (62883) for a 10-unit, three-story multi-family
01/05/16
residential building were submitted for staff review. As of 07/26/16, the plans
have not been approved.
requirements for a parking variance, a Special Use Permit and a Major
06/21/16
Modification to an existing Site Development Plan Review to allow a MixedUse development consisting of 18 residential units and 140 square feet of
restaurant area.
SS

Field Check
06/30/16
The site is undeveloped, containing mostly weeds on the interior and several
mature trees along 10th Street. The site is enclosed on three sides by a chain
link fence and a block wall on the south side.

Site Area
Net Acres
0.24
Surrounding
Property
Subject Property
North
South
East
West
Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12
Vacant
(approved MultiFamily Residential)
Office, Other than
Listed
Office, Other than
Listed
Office, Other than
Listed
Office, Other than
Listed
Planned or Special
MXU (Mixed Use)
R-3 (Medium Density

Residential)
MXU (Mixed Use)
P-O (Professional Office)
MXU (Mixed Use)
P-O (Professional Office)
C (Commercial)
MXU (Mixed Use)
R-3 (Medium Density

Residential)
P-R (Professional Office
and Parking)
Master Plan Areas

Trails
Compliance
N/A
Compliance
Y
Compliance
N/A
Y
N/A
N/A
SS

Standard
Required/Allowed
Min. Lot Size
6,500 SF
Min. Lot Width
N/A
Dwelling Units per Acre
13-50
Min. Setbacks:
Front
10 Feet
Side (north)
5 Feet
Side (south)
5 Feet
20 Feet
Rear
Min. Distance Between Buildings
10 Feet
55 Feet
Trash Enclosure
Mech. Equipment
Screened, Gated, w/ a Roof or

Trellis
Screened
Provided
10,418 SF
N/A
75
Compliance
Y
N/A
N
10 Feet
5 Feet
5 Feet
20 Feet
N/A
47 Feet
Screened,
Gated, w/
a Roof or
Trellis
Screened
Y
Y
Y
Y
N/A
Y
Y
Y
Pursuant to Title 19.06 and the approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-59513) for this site,
the following standards apply:
Approved SDR-59513
Provided
Compliance
Standards
Ratio
Trees
Buffer Trees:
North
6 Trees
6 Trees
Y
South
6 Trees
6 Trees
Y
East
2 Trees
3 Trees
Y
4 Trees
4 Trees
Y
West
18 Trees
19 Trees
Y
Min. Zone Width
North
5 Feet
5 Feet
Y
South
5 Feet
5 Feet
Y
East
0-6 Feet
0 Feet
Y
6 Feet
6 Feet
Y
West
6 Feet
Wall Height
Not required (not adjacent to residential)
adjacent to
N/A
south PL
SS

Street Name
10th Street
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Minor Street
Governing Document
Title 13.12
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
80
Compliance
with Street
Section
Y
Parking Requirement
Required
Provided
Compliance
Gross Floor
Parking
Parking
Area or
Use
Parking
Number of
HandiHandiRatio
Regular
Regular
Units
capped
capped
Multi-Family
1.25
10 Studio/
Residential
spaces per
18
4 1 BR
(Studio/1 BR)
unit
Multi-Family
1.75
Residential
4
spaces per
7
(2 BR)
unit
1 space
Guest Spaces
18
3
per 6 units
1 space
per 200
Restaurant
140 SF
SF back of
1
house
GFA
29
20
N
27
2
19
1
N
Percent Deviation
45%
Waivers
Requirement
A minimum landscape buffer
width of 6 feet along the west
property line was allowed and
approved through the original
entitlement.
Request
To reduce the buffer to

zero feet
Denial
SS
VAR-65380
VAR-65380
VAR-65380, SUP-65379 and SDR-65382
VAR-65380, SUP-65379 and SDR-65382
VAR-65380, SUP-65379 and SDR-65382
VAR-65380, SUP-65379 and SDR-65382
VAR-65380, SUP-65379 and SDR-65382
VAR-65380, SUP-65379 and SDR-65382
VAR-65380, SUP-65379 and SDR-65382
VAR-65380, SUP-65379 and SDR-65382
VAR-65380, SUP-65379 and SDR-65382
VAR-65380, SUP-65379 and SDR-65382
VAR-65380, SUP-65379 and SDR-65382
77
7
77777
77
7b7777777
77
777777777777777
777777A
77bA7777b7A77AbA77bA7
67777777777767A77
7777777777777A7A7
77777777b77
77AAb7A777AbA77bA776
777777777A77A7Ab77
Ab7A7777777777777
7777A7A77777
777b77
7777A77A777A7A7b7A
7AbA77bA77677777777
A77777777767A7
777b7677A7676
AA77A776A7A777A7A7
A7A767AbA7667A7A776777
77767A7A7777777777
777777A7A777
77777b77
77777777777777

7777777777777

777777A77777777
VAR-65380, SUP-65379 and SDR-65382
77777777777777
777777777777
7777777777777
777777777
777777777777777
7777777b7A77777
7777777777777
77777777777777
777777777
7
7
7777
7
777777777777
77
77777777777777
7777777777
7777
7
77
VAR-65380, SUP-65379 and SDR-65382
VAR-65380 [PRJ-65295] VARIANCE RELATED TO SUP-65379 AND SDR-65382 - APPLICANT/OWNER:

JOSE PICHARDO
EAST SIDE OF 10TH STREET, NORTH OF GARCES AVENUE
06/30/16

JOSE PICHARDO
06/30/16

JOSE PICHARDO
06/30/16
A 77
77
7A 7b
7 7
7 7 77 7 7 A 7
A 7 7 7A 7 A
b 7b b 7 7 7A 77
A 7 A
b 7b b
b A 7 7 A
A
7 7
7 7
A 7 7
7A A A
b 7 7 A
A 7 7A
7b
7
A 7 7
b 7 A A
7b 7b 7777 777A 777A 7

7 77 7 7 7 75 7A 7 7
7 5 A 7 A 7 7 7A
A 7 7A 7A 7 5 7 A b A 7 5 5 7A 7A
7 5 7 7 7 7 7 75 7 7
7 7A 7A 7 5 7 5 5 7A 7A 7
5 7 7 A 7 7 7 75 7 7 7
777777 77 7A 77
7 75 7 7 7 7 7 7
7 77b 7
777777 7

b 7 7A7 A
A 7 7A
7b7b
7 7 A b 7
7
A 7 A 7 A A 7
A 777 777b 77A 77

777 A 77777
77777 77 77777
7777777 b 777A
77 7 7777777b 77

A 7 7777 7 7777
7 7 7 7 7 777 7
777
A 7 7 7777777 77
77 77777 7 77
777 7 77777 7
A 7 7 7777777 77
77 777777 77
7 7777777 77777
b 7
A 7
7

777
7 7 7 7 7b b 7 7 A 7b A 7 b 7A A
VAR-65380, SUP-65379 and SDR-65382
77
7 77 7
A 77
A 777 77777777
77 7 7777777777
7 77
7b 77A 77777777777
777
A 77777 77777
77 7777777777
777 7
7777 77b 7 77777

77 77 77777
77 7 7777 77777
7777
7 A 777777777 7A
7A 7 7 77b 7 7 77
77777 7 777 7777 7A 7
7C7 777777 7 77
7 7777777
7777 777777
7 A 7b 7b 7 777777b 7 7 7
777 7
7 +
b 77A 7 7 7A 7A A 7777 C
777777 777 77 77
77 7 7 7 7 7 7b 7 7 7
777
7777 77 77 7
77A 777 77 777 77
777777777 77 7
777A 777777 77 7
7777 777777777
77777
VAR-65380, SUP-65379 and SDR-65382
77
7 77 7
A 77
77 77 7 777777
A 7777 77 7777
77 7777777777
777 777777
7 77 7 7 7 777 77

7777 77777777
777777777777 7
777 777
77 7A 77777 7
77 77 777777 77
7 77 7777777 77
7A 7777b 777 7777
777777777b 7777
7777777 77777
7 7 7 7 7b 7 7A 7 7 7
7777 777777 777
77777 77777 7
7777777 777 7A 7b
7 777 7A 7 777
777 77 77 7
7 77 7b 7 777 77 7 C7
7 777777777
777 7777777777
7 7 7 777 77 777
7
7 777A 7 77 777 7b 7b C77A 77
7A 7

77
A
VAR-65380, SUP-65379 and SDR-65382

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
SUP-65379 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT RELATED TO VAR-65380 - PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT/OWNER: JOSE PICHARDO - For possible action on a request for a Special Use
Permit FOR A MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT on the east side of 10th Street, approximately 50
feet north of Garces Avenue (APN 139-34-801-012), R-3 (Medium Density Residential) Zone,
Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-65295]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
RECOMMENDATION:

paper use, backup
SUP-65379
SUP-65379

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
SDR-65382 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO VAR-65380 AND SUP65379 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: JOSE PICHARDO - For possible action
on a request for a Major Amendment of an approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR59513) FOR A PROPOSED THREE-STORY MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT CONSISTING
OF 140 SQUARE FEET OF RESTAURANT USES AND 18 MULTI-FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL UNITS, WITH A WAIVER TO ALLOW A ZERO-FOOT LANDSCAPE
BUFFER ALONG A PORTION OF THE WEST PROPERTY LINE WHERE SIX FEET WAS
APPROVED on 0.24 acres on the east side of 10th Street, approximately 50 feet north of Garces
Avenue (APN 139-34-801-012), R-3 (Medium Density Residential) Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin)
RECOMMENDATION:
3. Protest Postcard

paper use, backup
SDR-65382
SDR-65382
SDR 65382
Jose Picardo
E side of 10th Street, N of Garces Avenue

First Use
127.15

AM Peak Hour
HIGH-TURNOVER (SIT-DWN)
RESTAURANT [1000 SF]
0.14
PM Peak Hour
11.52
11.15
18
2
2
Second Use
AM Peak Hour
6.65
APARTMENT [DWELL]
18
PM Peak Hour
0.51
0.62
120
9
11
Total Use
AM Peak Hour
6.65
APARTMENT [DWELL]
PM Peak Hour
18
0.51
0.62
138
11
13

Charleston Boulevard
31,438
2,515
10th Street
1,026
82

10th Street

34,500
13,040
This project will add approximately 138 trips per day on Charleston Blvd., 10th St. and Garces Ave. Charleston is currently
at about 90 percent of capacity and 10th is at about 8 percent of capacity. After this project, Charleston is expected to be
at about 92 percent of capacity and 10th to be at about 9 percent of capacity. Counts are unavailable for Garces in this
vicinity, but it is believed to be under capacity.
Based on Peak Hour use, this development will add into the area roughly 13 additional cars, or about one every four
minutes.

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
VAR-65234 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: DAN
CLONINGER AND JAENE GRAYE - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO
ALLOW A ZERO-FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK WHERE FIVE FEET IS REQUIRED, A
ZERO-FOOT DISTANCE SEPARATION FROM THE PRIMARY RESIDENCE WHERE SIX
FEET IS REQUIRED, AND TO NOT BE AESTHETICALLY COMPATIBLE WITH THE
PRINCIPAL DWELLING WHERE SUCH IS REQUIRED FOR A PROPOSED ACCESSORY
STRUCTURE (CLASS II) [CARPORT] on 0.16 acres at 9045 Gray Bluff Drive (APN 138-08214-009), R-CL (Single Family Compact-Lot) Zone, Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-65178]. Staff
recommends DENIAL.
RECOMMENDATION:
4. Photo(s)
6. Protest Postcards
VAR-65234 [PRJ-65178]

DEPARTMENT:
PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: DAN CLONINGER AND JAENE
GRAYE
CASE
NUMBER
VAR-65234
RECOMMENDATION
REQUIRED FOR
APPROVAL

conditions:
** NOTIFICATION **
NOTICES MAILED
381
APPROVALS
PROTESTS
22
NE
VAR-65234 [PRJ-65178]
Conditions Page One
** CONDITIONS **
Planning
1.
The Accessory Structure (Class II) [Carport] shall be painted to match the primary
residence.
2.
3.
Safety.
4.
5.
NE
VAR-65234 [PRJ-65178]
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is requesting a Variance to allow for the construction of a steel carport in the side
yard of a residence located at 9045 Gray Bluff Drive.
ISSUES
A Variance is required to allow for the proposed carport to be zero feet from the side
property line.
A Variance is required to allow for the proposed carport to be zero-feet from the primary
residence where six feet is required.
A Variance is required to allow the carport to not be aesthetically compatible with the
primary residence.
ANALYSIS
The applicant has proposed to construct a steel ten-foot tall, ten-foot wide, and 20-foot long,
metal carport within the 10-foot wide side yard area on the eastern side of the primary residence.
The subject site is zoned R-CL (Single Family Compact-Lot), and is a corner lot that requires a
10-foot corner side yard setback and a total combined side yard setback of 15 feet. Title 19
requires Accessory Structures to be separated six feet from the primary residence, and three feet
from the side property line. The applicant is requesting this Variance in order to provide shade
for a passenger vehicle and a travel trailer.
The proposed carport structure is 200 square feet and does not require a building permit, but is
required to meet residential setback requirements for an Accessory Structure Class II [Carport].
Staff does not able to support this application and is recommending denial, since this is a selfimposed hardship.
If approved, staff has added a Condition of Approval requiring the metal carport structure to be
painted the same color as the primary residence to address the aesthetic incompatibility issue.
NE
VAR-65234 [PRJ-65178]
1.
2.
3.


resolution.
has created a self-imposed hardship by proposing to install an Accessory Structure (carport)
within the side setback area. In view of the absence of any hardships imposed by the sites
physical characteristics, it is concluded that the applicants hardship is preferential in nature, and
it is thereby outside the realm of NRS Chapter 278 for granting of Variances; therefore staff is
recommending denial of this application.
Code Enforcement received a complaint (#140302) for food being thrown out
04/21/14
onto the street to feed the pigeons. The case was resolved on 05/07/14.
Code Enforcement received a complaint (#142038) for food being thrown out
06/03/14
onto the street to feed the pigeons. The case was resolved on 06/05/14.

03/13/09

There are no related building permits or business licenses for the subject site.
NE
VAR-65234 [PRJ-65178]
06/14/16
for a Variance were discussed.
Field Check
06/30/16
During a routine field check staff observed a well-maintained single family

residence and the subject area proposed for the carport.

Site Area
Net Acres
0.16
Surrounding
Property
Subject Property
North
South
East
West
Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12
Single Family,
Detached
Single Family,
Detached
Single Family,
Detached
Single Family,
Detached
Single Family,
Detached
Planned or Special
ML (Medium Low
ML (Medium Low
ML (Medium Low
ML (Medium Low
ML (Medium Low

R-CL (Single Family
Compact-Lot)
R-CL (Single Family
Compact-Lot)
R-CL (Single Family
Compact-Lot)
R-CL (Single Family
Compact-Lot)
R-CL (Single Family
Compact-Lot)
Master Plan Areas

Trails
Compliance
N/A
Compliance
N/A
Compliance
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
NE
VAR-65234 [PRJ-65178]
Street Name
Gray Bluff Drive
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Local
Governing Document
Title 13
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
48
Compliance
with Street
Section
Y or N
Pursuant to 19.06, the following standards apply:

Standard
Required/Allowed
Provided
Compliance
Min. Lot Size
3,000 SF
6970 SF
Y
Min. Lot Width
35 Feet
70 Feet
Y
Min. Setbacks
Front (To House)
14 Feet
14 Feet
Y
Front (To Garage)
18 Feet
21 Feet
Y
Side
5 Feet
0 Feet
N*
Corner
10 Feet
10 Feet
Y
10 Feet
30 Feet
Y
Rear
6 Feet
Feet
N*
Max. Lot Coverage
70 %
%
Y or N
*The applicant is requesting a Variance to allow for an Accessory Structure (Class II) [Carport]
to be located in the side yard, zero-feet from the primary residence, and zero-feet from the side
property line.
NE
VAR-65234
mmmm
xxxxxxxxxx
mmmmmmm
bbbbbbbbbbsss
xxxxxxxxxxx
VAR-65234
VAR-65234
VAR-65234
VAR-65234
VAR-65234
VAR-65234
VAR-65234

b7A77A
7
A
7A 7
7A7++7
7
777
7b 7 +7b77b
77
7 7
A+7AAb77
79 7
79 7
b7
b

7 7
7 7
7
7
7
b7
b
7
77
77 7 7

+7 7
A7+7
7
VAR-65234
b7

77

VAR-65234
VAR-65234 [PRJ-65178] VARIANCE - APPLICANT/OWNER: DAN CLONINGER AND JAENE GRAYE

9045 GRAY BLUFF DRIVE
06/30/16
VAR-65234 [PRJ-65178] VARIANCE - APPLICANT/OWNER: DAN CLONINGER AND JAENE GRAYE

9045 GRAY BLUFF DRIVE
06/30/16
VAR-65234
VAR-65234
VAR-65234
VAR-65234
VAR-65234
VAR-65234
VAR-65234
VAR-65234
VAR-65234
VAR-65234

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
VAR-65413 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: JRJ PROPERTIES
- For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW A ZERO-FOOT REAR YARD
SETBACK WHERE 20 FEET IS REQUIRED FOR AN EXISTING BUILDING on 0.86 acres
at 5000 West Sahara Avenue (APN 163-01-803-012), C-2 (General Commercial) Zone, Ward 1
(Tarkanian) [PRJ-65253]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
RECOMMENDATION:
4. Photo(s)
VAR-65413 [PRJ-65253]

DEPARTMENT:
PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: JRJ PROPERTIES
CASE
NUMBER
RECOMMENDATION
VAR-65413

conditions:
REQUIRED FOR
APPROVAL
** NOTIFICATION **
NOTICES MAILED
20
APPROVALS
PROTESTS
16
SS
VAR-65413 [PRJ-65253]
Conditions Page One
** CONDITIONS **
Planning
1.
Conformance to the approved conditions for Site Development Plan Review (SDR-43737).
2.
3.
Safety.
4.
5.
SS
VAR-65413 [PRJ-65253]
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is proposing to remap a conforming lot line to the rear edge of the existing
building at 5000 West Sahara Avenue. The map cannot be recorded unless a Variance is
approved allowing no rear yard setback.
ISSUES
A Variance is required to allow an existing building at 5000 West Sahara Avenue to be set
back zero feet from a proposed property line where the C-2 (General Commercial) zoning
district requires a 20-foot rear yard setback. Staff does not support the request.
ANALYSIS
Development within this site is subject to the requirements of Title 19.08 for C-2 zoned
properties. The C-2 (General Commercial) zoning district requires a 20-foot rear yard setback
for all buildings. In April 2016, two parcels at the northwest corner of Sahara Avenue and
Decatur Boulevard were merged and split into three lots through a parcel map (PMP-62941).
That map indicated a new property line 20 feet behind the building in conformance with C-2
setback requirements. The applicant now plans to remap the lot line at the rear of the existing
building on APN 163-03-301-012, which would first require a variance before the map could be
recorded.
The existing buildings rear face forms part of a wall that separates the grade in the parking lot
and impedes access to the rear of the property. The area behind the building is several feet lower
than the area in front of the building. The purpose of remapping the lot line is to allow this area
to be part of the lot to the north, which has an approved (but unexercised) entitlement for a
hospital and medical building.
The hardship in this case is self-created, as the new lot line is proposed to be mapped at the rear
edge of the existing building where the physical characteristics of the property do not require it.
The rear parking and loading area is only currently accessible through APN 163-01-803-013.
This was not the case prior to recordation of PMP-62941. Staff therefore recommends denial. If
denied, the current lot line separating APNs 163-01-803-012 and 013 cannot be moved any
closer to the building.
SS
VAR-65413 [PRJ-65253]
1.
2.
3.


resolution.
has created a self-imposed hardship by proposing to remap an existing lot line zero feet from the
rear of the building at 5000 West Sahara Avenue. The current lot configuration allows
conformance to the Title 19 requirements. In view of the absence of any hardships imposed by
the sites physical characteristics, it is concluded that the applicants hardship is preferential in
nature, and it is thereby outside the realm of NRS Chapter 278 for granting of Variances.
Upon an appeal request, the City Council approved a Site Development Plan
Review (SDR-3347) for the remodel and expansion of an existing Auto
01/21/04
Dealership on 9.39 acres at the northwest corner of Sahara Avenue and
Decatur Boulevard. The Planning Commission and staff recommended
approval.
The Planning Commission approved a Site Development Plan Review
(SDR-43737) for a proposed Motor Vehicle Sales (New) facility with
Waivers to allow landscape buffer widths of zero feet along portions of the
12/13/11
south and east property lines where 15 feet is required and along the north and
west property lines where eight feet is required on 5.40 acres at the northwest
corner of Sahara Avenue and Decatur Boulevard. Staff recommended
approval.
SS
VAR-65413 [PRJ-65253]

A three-lot merger and resubdivision parcel map on 5.29 acres at the
04/12/16
northwest corner of Sahara Avenue and Decatur Boulevard was recorded.
[File 121 Page 22 of Parcel Maps]
The Planning Commission approved a Site Development Plan Review (SDR63916) for a proposed 40,188 square-foot, two-story hospital and medical
05/10/16
office building on 5.31 acres at the northwest corner of Sahara Avenue and
Decatur Boulevard. Staff recommended approval.

04/26/16

1970
Construction year of the building on APN 163-01-803-013
1992
Construction year of the building on APN 163-01-803-012.
A Building Permit (#01019614) was issued for the partial demolition and
11/07/01
redevelopment of an automobile dealership at 2333 South Decatur Boulevard.
A Certificate of Occupancy was issued on 03/29/02.
A business license (A65-00049) was issued for wholesale auto sales at 5000
04/16/03
West Sahara Avenue. The license is currently active.
Staff met with the applicant and discussed the process of applying for a
variance in order to reduce an existing building set back to zero feet from a
property line proposed through a future parcel map. Concern was raised from
the Fire Department about possible building and fire code issues with a nonrated building at the property line; however, the applicant explained that the
06/20/16
building was originally constructed at the property line prior to the last
recorded map. It was therefore concluded that this would not be an issue. The
applicant was urged to consult with the Department of Building and Safety,
who were not present for this meeting, for options related to the building
code.
SS
VAR-65413 [PRJ-65253]
Field Check
06/30/16
The site is developed with an auto dealership. The paved parking and loading
area behind the building is at a lower grade than the area in front of the
building.

Site Area
Net Acres
0.85
Surrounding
Property
Subject Property
North
Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12
Motor Vehicle Sales
(New)
Motor Vehicle Sales
(New)
Planned or Special
MXU (Mixed Use)
MXU (Mixed Use)
General Retail Store
CG (Commercial
General) Clark County
designation
East
Undeveloped
MXU (Mixed Use)
West
Motor Vehicle Sales

(New)
C (Commercial)
South

C-2 (General
Commercial)
C-2 (General
Commercial)
C-2 (General
Commercial) Clark
County designation
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
Master Plan Areas

Trails
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area (Redevelopment Area 2)
Compliance
N/A
Compliance
N/A
Compliance
N/A
Y
N/A
N/A
SS
VAR-65413 [PRJ-65253]
Standard
Required/Allowed
Min. Setbacks
Front
10 Feet
Side
10 Feet
Corner
10 Feet
20 Feet
Rear
Street Name
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Sahara Avenue
Primary Arterial
Provided
Compliance
93 Feet
78 Feet
N/A
0 Feet
Y
Y
N/A
N
Governing Document
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Compliance
with Street
Section

and Highways
150
SS
A 7 7 A b A 7
VAR-65413
b 7 7
77 7 7
77A 7 7
77 7 b &
77777& 777 777 777b 7b 7

7b 77777777777 7
7 7777 77777 77
777777 77
77777 777b 7b 77 7b 7 7
7777 777777 7 77b 7 7

77A 777A 7 77777 777
777 777
b 7

A
77 7
7
77 77
7b 77 7
777 7 @
777
VAR-65413
VAR-65413
77b77777Ab777
Ab
77Ab7A7A7A7AA7
Ab A A A
VAR-65413
VAR-65413
VAR-65413
VAR-65413
VAR-65413 [PRJ-65253] VARIANCE - APPLICANT/OWNER: JRJ PROPERTIES

5000 WEST SAHARA AVENUE
06/30/16

06/30/16

06/30/16

06/30/16

06/30/16

06/30/16

06/30/16

06/30/16
VAR-65413

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
SUP-65414 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: D F DURANGO,
LLC - OWNER: DURANGO I-95, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Special Use
Permit FOR A BEER/WINE/COOLER OFF-SALE ESTABLISHMENT WITHIN A
PROPOSED 6,278 SQUARE-FOOT CONVENIENCE STORE (WITH FUEL PUMPS) on the
southwest corner of Durango Drive and El Capitan Way (APN 125-17-612-012), T-C (Town
Center) Zone [SC-TC (Service Commercial - Town Center) Special Land Use Designation],
Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-64494]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps - SUP-65414, SUP-65415, SUP-65416, SUP-65417, SUP-65418
and SDR-65550 [PRJ-64494]
2. Special Map
3. Conditions and Staff Report - SUP-65414, SUP-65415, SUP-65416, SUP-65417, SUP-65418
and SDR-65550 [PRJ-64494]
4. Supporting Documentation - SUP-65414, SUP-65415, SUP-65416, SUP-65417, SUP-65418
and SDR-65550 [PRJ-64494]
5. Photo(s) - SUP-65414, SUP-65415, SUP-65416, SUP-65417, SUP-65418 and SDR-65550
[PRJ-64494]
6. Justification Letter - SUP-65414, SUP-65415, SUP-65416, SUP-65417, SUP-65418 and
SDR-65550 [PRJ-64494]
7. Protest Postcard SUP-65414 and SUP-65415 [PRJ-64494]
SUP-65414, SUP-65415, SUP-65416, SUP-65417, SUP-65418 and SDR-65550 [PRJ-64494]

DEPARTMENT:
PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: D F DURANGO, LLC - OWNER: DURANGO I95, LLC
CASE
NUMBER
SUP-65414
SUP-65415
SUP-65416
SUP-65417
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends
conditions:
Staff recommends
conditions:
Staff recommends
conditions:
Staff recommends
conditions:
REQUIRED FOR
APPROVAL
DENIAL, if approved subject to

SUP-65418

conditions:
SDR-65550

conditions:
SUP-65414
SUP-65415
SUP-65416
SUP-65417
SUP-65418
** NOTIFICATION **
58
NOTICES MAILED
1105 SUP-65414 and SUP-65415

1105 SUP-65416 and SUP-65417
1105 SUP-65418 and SDR-65550
APPROVALS
0 SUP-65414 and SUP-65415

0 SUP-65416 and SUP-65417
0 SUP-65418 and SDR-65550
PROTESTS
1 SUP-65414 and SUP-65415

1 SUP-65416 and SUP-65417
0 SUP-65418 and SDR-65550
FS

Conditions Page One
** CONDITIONS **
Planning
1.
Conformance to all minimum requirements under the Town Center Development Standards
and LVMC Title 19.12 for a Beer/Wine/Cooler Off-sale Establishment use.
2.
3.
4.
Safety.
5.
6.
7.
Municipal Code.
8.
Planning
1.
Conformance to all minimum requirements under the Town Center Development Standards
for a Convenience Store (With Fuel Pumps) use.
FS

Conditions Page Two
2.
3.
4.
Safety.
5.
6.
Planning
1.
Conformance to all Minimum Requirements under the Town Center Development

Standards for a proposed Gaming Establishment, Restricted use.
2.
3.
4.
Safety.
5.
6.
FS

Planning
1.
Conformance to all Minimum Requirements under the Town Center Development

Standards and LVMC Title 19.12 for a proposed Car Wash, Full Service or Auto Detailing
use.
2.
3.
4.
A Waiver from Title 19.12 is hereby approved, to allow service bay doors to front a rightof-way where such is not permitted.
5.
Safety.
6.
7.
Planning
1.
Conformance to all Minimum Requirements under Town Center Development Standards

for an Auto Smog Check use.
2.
FS

3.
4.
Safety.
5.
6.
Planning
1.
Approval of and conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Special Use Permits (SUP65414, SUP-65415, SUP-65416, SUP-65417, SUP-65418) shall be required, if approved.
2.
Conformance to the Conditions of Approval for approved Site Development Plan Review
(SDR-20496) shall be required.
3.
4.
elevations, date stamped 07/05/16 except as amended by conditions herein.
5.
A Waiver from the SC-TC (Service Commercial Town Center) perimeter landscape
requirements is hereby approved to allow a two-foot landscape buffer area were 15 feet is
required.
6.
A Waiver from the Town Center building placement requirements is hereby approved to
allow the proposed buildings to not abut the build-to-line adjacent to El Capitan Way.
7.
Safety.
FS

8.
9.

10.
11.
All mechanical equipment shall be adequately screened to satisfy the requirements

contained in the Town Center Development Standards Manual.
12.
Public Works
13.
to this site on 10th Street in accordance with code requirements of Title 13.56.040, if any,
to the satisfaction of the City Engineer concurrent with development of this site.
14.
discuss fire requirements for the proposed use of this facility. The design and layout of all
onsite private circulation and access drives shall meet the approval of the Department of
Fire Services.
15.
An update to the previously approved Master Traffic Impact Analysis must be submitted to
and approved by the Department of Public Works prior to the issuance of any building or
grading permits or the submittal of any construction drawings, whichever may occur first.
Comply with the recommendations of the approved update to the Traffic Impact Analysis
prior to occupancy of the site. No recommendation of the approved Traffic Impact
Analysis, nor compliance therewith, shall be deemed to modify or eliminate any condition
of approval imposed by the Planning Commission or the City Council on the development
of this site.
16.
An Update to the previously approved Drainage Plan and Technical Drainage Study must
be submitted to and approved by the Department of Public Works prior to the issuance of
any grading or building permits, submittal of construction drawings or the submittal of a
Final Map for this site, whichever may occur first. Provide and improve all drainageways
as recommended in the approved drainage plan/study.
FS

Conditions Page Six
17.
Site development to comply with all applicable conditions of approval for SDR-20496 and
all other site related actions.
FS

** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The request is for a Special Use Permit and a major amendment to an approved Site
Development Plan Review (SDR-20496) for a 6,278 square-foot Convenience Store (with Fuel
Pumps) at the northwest corner of Durango Drive and El Capitan Way. Associated Special Use
Permits include requests for a Beer/Wine/Cooler Off-Sale Establishment, a Restricted Gaming
Establishment, a Full Service Car Wash, and an Auto Smog Check in conjunction with the
proposed convenience store.
ISSUES
A Special Use Permit is required for a Convenience Store (with Fuel Pumps) within the SCTC (Service Commercial Town Center) land use designation. Staff recommends denial of
the request.
A Special Use Permit is required for a Beer/Wine/Cooler Off-sale establishment within the
SC-TC (Service Commercial Town Center) land use designation. Staff recommends denial
of the request.
A Special Use Permit is required for a Car Wash, Full Service or Auto Detailing use within
the SC-TC (Service Commercial Town Center) land use designation. Staff recommends
denial of the request.
A Special Use Permit is required for a Gaming Establishment, Restricted use within the SCTC (Service Commercial Town Center) land use designation. Staff recommends denial of
the request.
A Special Use Permit is required for an Auto Smog Check as it does not meet all of the Town
Center Conditional Use regulations. Staff recommends denial of the request.
A perimeter landscape waiver is being requested with the Site Development Plan Review to
allow a one-foot perimeter landscape buffer area along a portion of the east property line
where 15 feet is required. Staff recommends denial of this request.
A waiver is being requested to allow the street side of the building to not abut the build-toline when adjacent to a primary pedestrian corridor. Staff recommends denial of this request.
ANALYSIS
The request is for a major amendment to an approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR20496) for a 6,278 square-foot Convenience Store (with Fuel Pumps) with an ancillary full
service car wash and auto smog check at the southeast corner of an existing commercial
shopping center. The site plan depicts a 3,750 square-foot convenience store, a 2,310 squareFS

foot carwash with stacking for six cars, covered car vacuum areas, and a smog test kiosk with
one open air test bay. The sites location within a commercial subdivision allows for shared
parking throughout the existing shopping center. The proposed development does not increase
the parking requirement of the overall site. The original site plan indicates a total of 1,137
parking spaces provided where 1,081 were required.
The Town Center commercial development standards require that commercial buildings along
primary pedestrian corridors abut the build-to-line on the side of the building facing the street.
There is a multi-use trail alignment on El Capitan Way, which is considered a primary pedestrian
corridor. The commercial building should be located at the build-to-line along the east property
line where vacuum service bays are proposed, and a waiver has been requested to provide relief
from this requirement. The waiver request is recommended for denial as the site design
compromises the integrity of the Town Center streetscape and interrupts the continuity of the
pedestrian realm. This location is at a prominent intersection within the Town Center plan area,
and the site design does not adequately reflect the character or intent of the Town Center
Development Standards.
The landscape plan does not depict the required SC-TC (Service Commercial Town Center)
15-foot landscape buffer area along the east property line. Within the SC-TC (Service
Commercial- Town Center) designation, a 15-foot wide amenity zone, in addition to the width of
any detached or attached sidewalk, is to be provided between the right-of-way and the proposed
use. The applicant has requested a perimeter landscape waiver to allow a 2-foot perimeter
landscape buffer along a portion of the east property line where 15 feet is required. The waiver
request is recommended for denial as the landscape deficiency could be alleviated by an alternate
site design or reducing the site intensity. The minimal landscape buffer area also reduces
screening and aesthetic qualities at this prominent intersection within the Town Center plan area.
The required landscape buffer areas along Durango Drive are not depicted on the provided plans;
however, a note is included on the landscape plan that indicates that the landscape in this area is
existing and will remain. A visual inspection of aerial imagery confirms that the required
landscape has been installed as required.
The building elevations depict a one-story convenience store with a stucco, aluminum, stone and
glass exterior. The color scheme is generally consistent with Town Center Standards. The
proposed car wash is similar in design, and is consistent with the primary building on the site.
The fuel canopies are of a typical design, and the smog check kiosk uses materials that generally
match that of the primary building.
The site design and proposed reduction of perimeter landscaping detracts from the character of
the existing shopping center as well as development in the general area. Given the sites location
at a prominent Town Center intersection, it should exemplify the high design standards of the
Town Center plan area by both providing adequate landscaping and having a site design that
FS

accentuates the pedestrian realm. The site as proposed is over-built and too intense for the size
of the subject parcel. As such, staff recommends denial of the Site Development Plan Review
and of the requested waivers.
A Special Use Permit is required for a Beer/Wine/Cooler Off-Sale Establishment within the SCTC (Service Commercial Town Center) land use designation.
A Beer/Wine/Cooler Off-Sale Establishment is defined as An establishments whose license to
sell alcoholic beverages is limited to the sale of beer, wine and coolers to consumers only and not
for resale, in original sealed or corked containers, for consumption off the premises where the
same are sold, and is operated in connection with a grocery store, drug store, convenience store
or specialty merchandise store.
* 1.
Except as otherwise provided, no beer/wine/cooler off-sale establishment (hereinafter

establishment) shall be located within 400 feet of any church/house of worship, school,
individual care center licensed for more than 12 children, or City park.
The site meets all distance separation requirements for the proposed use.
* 2.
Except as otherwise provided in Requirement 3 below, the distances referred to in

Requirement 1 shall be determined with reference to the shortest distance between two
property lines, one being the property line of the proposed establishment which is closest
to the existing use to which the measurement pertains, and the other being the property
line of that existing use which is closest to the proposed establishment. The distance shall
be measured in a straight line without regard to intervening obstacles. For purposes of
measurement, the term property line refers to property lines of fee interest parcels and
does not include the property line of: a. Any leasehold parcel; or b. Any parcel which
lacks access to a public street or has no area for on-site parking and which has been
created so as to avoid the distance limitation described in Requirement 1.
* 3.
In the case of an establishment proposed to be located on a parcel of at least 80 acres in

size, the minimum distances referred to in Requirement 1 shall be measured in a straight
line:
a.
b.
From the nearest property line of the existing use to the nearest portion of the
structure in which the establishment will be located, without regard to intervening
obstacles; or
In the case of a proposed establishment which will be located within a shopping
center or other multiple tenant structure, from the nearest property line of the
existing use to the nearest property line of a leasehold or occupancy parcel in
which the establishment will be located, without regard to intervening obstacles.
FS

4.
When considering a Special Use Permit application for an establishment which also
requires a waiver of the distance limitation in Requirement 1, the Planning Commission
shall take into consideration the distance policy and shall, as part of its recommendation
to the City Council, state whether the distance requirement should be waived and the
reasons in support of the decision.
5.
The minimum distance requirements in Requirement 1 do not apply to: a. An

establishment which has a non-restricted gaming license in connection with a hotel
having 200 or more guest rooms on or before July 1, 1992 or in connection with a resort
hotel having in excess of 200 guest rooms after July 1, 1992; or b. A proposed
establishment having more than 50,000 square feet of retail floor space.
* 6.
All businesses which sell alcoholic beverages shall conform to the provisions of LVMC
Chapter 6.50.
7.
The minimum distance requirements set forth in Requirement 1, which are otherwise
non-waivable under the provisions of LVMC 19.12.050(C), may be waived:
a.
b.
c.
d.
8.
In accordance with the provisions of LVMC 19.12.050(C) for any

establishment which is proposed to be located on a parcel within the
Downtown Casino Overlay District;
In accordance with the applicable provisions of the Town Center
Development Standards Manual for any establishment which is proposed
to be located within the T-C (Town Center) Zoning District and which is
designated MS- TC (Main Street Mixed Use) in the Town Center Land
Use Plan;
In connection with a proposed establishment having between 20,000
square feet and 50,000 square feet of retail floor space, if no more than 10
percent of the retail floor space is regularly devoted to the display or
merchandising of alcoholic beverages; or
In connection with a retail establishment having less than 20,000 square
feet of retail floor space, if the area to be used for the sale, display or
merchandising of alcoholic beverages and each use to be protected are
separated by a highway or a right of way with a width of at least 100 feet.
No beer/wine/cooler off-sale establishment shall be permitted on or adjacent to the

Pedestrian Mall, as defined in LVMC Chapter 11.68. On-site Parking Requirement: No
additional parking required beyond that which is required for the principal use(s) on the
site
Staff recommends denial of the request because the requested building orientation and perimeter
landscape waivers associated with the companion Site Development Plan Review indicates that
the site is not physically suitable for the type and intensity of the proposed land use.
FS

A Special Use Permit is required for a Convenience Store with Fuel Pumps use within the SCTC (Service Commercial Town Center) land use designation.
The Convenience Store with Fuel Pumps use is unique to the Town Center Plan area. The most
similar Title 19 definition is for a Convenience Store, which is defined as A facility designed to
have a minimum size of 1,200 square feet and no more than 5,000 square feet of floor space,
exclusive of warehouse and office area, devoted to the display of merchandise, that is primarily
used for the retail sale to the public of merchandise for offsite consumption, including
prepackaged food products, sundries, household items and similar consumer items. The term
does not include a retail business licensed as a drugstore pursuant to LVMC Title 6. The
proposed use meets the definition of Title 19.
The Minimum Town Center Special Use Permit Requirements for this use include:
a. Shall not locate within 330 feet of any single-family detached dwelling.
b. The installation and use of an outside public address or bell system is prohibited.
The provided plans do not indicate the installation of a public address or bell system, and
a condition of approval has been included to ensure compliance with this requirement.
A Special Use Permit is required for a Gaming Establishment, Restricted use within the SC-TC
(Service Commercial Town Center) land use designation.
Gaming Establishment, Restricted is defined as An establishment which is used or intended to
be used for gaming activities for which a restricted gaming license is required pursuant to Title 6
of the Las Vegas Municipal Code. For informational purposes, the term refers to an
establishment whose gaming operations are limited to not more than fifteen slot machines,
incidental to the primary business at the establishment, and no other game or gaming device.
a. Special Use Permit is required for any new gaming establishment.
A Special Use Permit has been requested for this use.
b. May not locate within 330 feet of any single-family detached dwelling.
FS

A Special Use Permit is required for the proposed Car Wash, Full Service or Auto Detailing use
within the SC-TC (Service Commercial Town Center) land use designation.
Car Wash, Full Service or Auto Detailing is defined as An establishment that provides for the
washing, cleaning, waxing or detailing of passenger vehicles, either by means of employees or
by means of automated or semi-automated methods of cleaning, or by a combination thereof.
1. Each wash bay shall have a stacking lane that will accommodate at least six cars.
The wash bay has minimum stacking for six cars as required.
the site is not physically suitable for the type and intensity of the proposed land use
An Auto Smog Check is a conditional use within the SC-TC (Service Commercial Town
Center) land use; however, a Special Use Permit is required as the proposal does not comply
with all conditional use requirements.
Auto Smog Check is defined as A facility for the testing of vehicle emissions.
1. All service shall be performed within a completely enclosed structure.
The site plan and elevations depict a smog check kiosk with an open air check area. The
proposal is not in compliance with this requirement.
2. If conducted as an accessory use of a Service Station or an Auto Repair (Major or
Minor), the facility shall be designed to be architecturally compatible with the primary
building on the site.
The smog check is not part of a Service Station or Auto Repair facility.
3. When operated as a primary use, no other automobile repair shall be permitted in
conjunction with the facility.
FS

The smog check will be ancillary to the convenience store use.

4. No required parking spaces shall be used or eliminated to provide the facility.
Required parking spaces have not been used or eliminated.
5. Any permanent structure shall have a Site Development Plan Review, per LVMC
19.16.100.
The permanent smog kiosk being proposed is included with the companion Site
Development Plan Review.
6. Service bay doors shall not face public right of way and shall remain closed except to
allow the entry or exit of vehicles.
No service bays are proposed with the smog check facility.
Staff recommends denial of the request because the proposed smog check does not meet the
Town Center standard of performing all service within a completely enclosed building.
1.
The proposed Beer/Wine/Cooler Off-sale use can be conducted in a manner that is
harmonious and compatible with existing surrounding land uses as projected by the
general plan.
2.
The requested waivers with the associated Site Development Plan Review indicate that the
site is not physically suitable for the type and intensity of the proposed land use.
3.
Durango Drive and El Capitan Way are adequate in size to meet the requirements of the
proposed use.
FS

4.
General Plan.
The use permit at the site in question will not be inconsistent with or compromise the
public health, safety and welfare or the overall objectives of the General Plan.
5.
The use meets all applicable conditions of the Town Center Development Standards and
Title 19.12.
1.
The proposed Convenience Store (With Fuel Pumps) use can be conducted in a manner
that is harmonious and compatible with existing surrounding land uses as projected by the
general plan.
2.
site is not physically suitable for the type and intensity of the proposed land use
3.
proposed use.
4.
General Plan.
FS

5.
Title 19.12.
1.
The proposed Gaming Establishment, Restricted use can be conducted in a manner that is
harmonious and compatible with existing surrounding land uses as projected by the
general plan.
2.
3.
proposed use.
4.
General Plan.
5.
Title 19.12.
FS

1.
The proposed Car Wash, Full Service or Auto Detailing use can be conducted in a manner
that is harmonious and compatible with existing surrounding land uses as projected by the
general plan.
2.
3.
proposed use.
4.
General Plan.
5.
Title 19.12.
FS

1.
The proposed Auto Smog Check use can be conducted in a manner that is harmonious and
compatible with existing surrounding land uses as projected by the general plan.
2.
site is not physically suitable for the type and intensity of the proposed land use. In
addition, the testing will not be taking place within an enclosed building as required by the
Town Center Conditional Use requirements for this use.
3.
proposed use.
4.
General Plan.
5.
Title 19.12.
1.

Due to the lack of perimeter landscape buffering along the east property line, the proposed
development is not compatible with the adjacent development or development within the
Town Center plan area.
FS

2.
3.
The proposal is not consistent with the required perimeter landscape requirements of the
Town Center Development Standards Manual.
The site access and circulation does not negativity impact adjacent roadways or
neighborhood traffic.
4.
The building and landscape materials are appropriate for the area and city; however, a
perimeter landscape waiver has been requested which indicates that the quantity of
provided landscaping does not meet the minimum Town Center design criteria.
5.

The building elevations are not unsightly, undesirable or obnoxious in appearance and are
compatible with development in the area.
6.
general welfare.
general welfare.
The Board of City Commissioners approved an Annexation (A-0003-64) of
05/12/64
approximately 5,000 acres generally located north of Lone Mountain Road
and west of Decatur Boulevard.
FS


The City Council approved a request for a Rezoning (Z-0076-98) to T-C
(Town Center) on 1,468 acres located within the Northwest General Plan
12/07/98
Amendment to the City of Las Vegas General Plan, including the subject site.
The Planning Commission and staff recommended approval.
The Planning Commission accepted the applicants request to withdraw
without prejudice a request for a Special Use Permit (SUP-20500) for a
04/26/07
Restaurant with Drive-Through use on the subject site.
Staff had
The City Council approved a request for Special Use Permits for Building and
Landscape Material/Lumber Yard (SUP-20497), Outdoor Storage, Accessory
07/11/07
(SUP-20498), and Restaurant with Drive-Through (SUP-20499) on the
subject site. The Planning Commission and staff recommended approval.
The City Council approved a request for a Site Development Plan Review
(SDR-20496) for a proposed 269,860 square foot commercial center and
07/11/07
waivers of the Town Center Development Standards for landscape buffer
requirements and fast food restaurant uses on the subject site. The Planning
Planning and Development Department staff approved a Minor Site
Development Plan Review of the overall shopping center site for reduction of
11/30/07
floor area of the Fast Food A building from 2,650 square feet to 2,407
square feet.
Code Enforcement responded to a complaint regarding graffiti on the subject
07/22/08
site. Code Enforcement resolved the case 07/25/08.
Development Plan Review of the overall shopping center site for revisions in
07/31/08
the elevations for the Major A building and Buildings A through G. There
were no major changes in height or materials.
The City Council approved a request for a Major Modification (MOD-28538)
of the Town Center Land Use Plan to amend the land use designation from
SC-TC (Service Commercial - Town Center) to GC-TC (General Commercial
09/17/08
- Town Center) on 7.97 acres at the southwest corner of Durango Drive and
Farm Road. The Planning Commission recommended approval; staff
recommended denial.
The Planning Commission approved a Waiver (WVR-33758) of the Town
Center Development Standards to allow no amenity zone along Durango
04/23/09
Drive where a 2.5-foot amenity zone was required. Staff recommended
denial.
A Final Map (FMP-27577) for a one-lot commercial subdivision (Carolines
06/19/09
Court) was recorded.
FS

Staff Report Page Fourteen

The Planning Commission approved a request for a Master Sign Plan (MSP34174) for a proposed commercial development on the subject site, with
waivers of the Town Center Sign Standards to allow 2,609 square feet of
freestanding signage where 1,506 square feet is allowed, a 100-foot pylon
06/25/09
sign where 24 feet is allowed, three monument signs along the El Capitan
Way street frontage where two are allowed, and to allow wall signs to face an
existing residential development that is located outside of the city limits of the
Centennial Hills Town Center where such is not permitted.
Staff
recommended denial.
The City Council approved Extensions of Time for previously approved
requests for Special Use Permits for Building and Landscape
Material/Lumber Yard (EOT-34757), Outdoor Storage, Accessory (EOT07/15/09
34759), and Restaurant with Drive-Through (EOT-34761) uses on the subject
site. The approvals will expire 07/11/10 unless another Extension of Time is
approved by the City Council. Staff recommended approval.
The City Council approved an Extension of Time (EOT-34762) for a
previously approved request for a Site Development Plan Review (SDR07/15/09
20496) for a proposed 296,860 square foot commercial center and waivers of
the Town Center Development Standards for landscape buffer requirements
on the subject site. Staff recommended approval.
Development Plan Review on the overall shopping center site for reduction in
09/21/09
overall floor area from 269,734 square feet to 269,212 square feet and to
revise the landscape plan to incorporate a drainage channel.
Development Plan Review on the overall shopping center site for reduction in
10/07/09
overall floor area from 269,212 square feet to 264,189 square feet and to
remove the drainage channel along the east perimeter of the site.
The City Council approved a Special Use Permit (SUP-36111) for a proposed
2,155 square-foot Restaurant with Drive-Through and a Variance (VAR12/02/09
36338) to allow no loading spaces on Pad G where one loading space is
required at 7737 North El Capitan Way.
The City Council approved (ROC-36456) to review Condition Number 21 of
12/02/09
a Site Development Plan Review (SDR-20496) to amend restrictions on hours
of operation on the site.
Planning Staff approved an administrative Site Development Plan Review
08/25/10
(SDR-39249) for a three story clock tower.
The Planning Commission will consider a Special Use Permit (SUP-64857)
08/02/16
and Site Development Plan Review (SDR-64859) for a 69,200 square-foot
mini-storage facility. Staff recommends approval.
FS

Staff Report Page Fifteen

06/04/16

A building permit (Hanson 25179) was issued for a 39-foot tall clock tower at
10/23/08
7741 North El Capitan Way.
General submittal items were discussed and the applicant acknowledged the
need for a building orientation waiver; an exception for parking lot
05/03/16
landscaping; five separate Special Use Permits; a Site Development Plan
Review.
Field Check
06/30/16
A field check verified an empty pad site within a commercial shopping center.
A clock tower is located within the southeastern portion of the site.

Site Area
Net Acres
1.03
Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12
Subject Property
Undeveloped
North
General Retail
South
Undeveloped
Planned or Special
SC-TC (Service
Commercial-Town
Center)
SC-TC (Service
Commercial-Town
Center)
GC-TC (General
Commercial Town
Center)

T-C (Town Center)
T-C (Town Center)
T-C (Town Center)
FS

Staff Report Page Sixteen
Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12
East
General Retail
West
General Retail
Planned or Special
SC-TC (Service
Commercial-Town
Center)
SC-TC (Service
Commercial-Town
Center)

T-C (Town Center)
T-C (Town Center)
Master Plan Areas

Town Center Master Plan
T-C (Town Center) District
Trails
Compliance
N
Compliance
N
Compliance
Y
N/A
N/A
N/A
The subject site does not meet the perimeter landscape buffer requirements of the Town Center
Development Standards Manual. The Multi-Use Transportation Trail required along the west
side of El Captain Way was installed with a prior project.
Pursuant to Town Center Development Standards Manual, the following standards apply:
Standard
Required/Allowed
Provided
Compliance
Min. Setbacks
Front
15 Feet
170 Feet
Y
Side
10 Feet
90 Feet
Y
Corner
15 Feet
20 Feet
Y
20 Feet
36 Feet
Y
Rear
2 stories
1 story
Y
Screened, Gated,
Trash Enclosure
w/ a Roof or
Y
Roof or Trellis
Trellis
Mech. Equipment
Screened
Screened
Y
There is an existing screened trash enclosure to the north of the subject site, and no other
enclosures are proposed. All mechanical equipment will be screen per Town Center standards.
FS

Staff Report Page Seventeen
Pursuant to Town Center Development Standards Manual, the following standards apply:
Required
Provided
Compliance
Standards
Ratio
Trees
Buffer Trees:
Y
South
5 Trees
8 Trees
Y
3 Trees
4 Trees
East
Parking Area Trees
Min. Zone Width
South
15 Feet
East
15 Feet
8 Trees
12 Trees
5 Trees
6 Trees
20 Feet
2 Feet
Y
N
The Town Center Development Standards require a 15-foot landscaped amenity zone between
the right-of-way and the proposed use within the SC-TC (Service Commercial Town Center)
designation. The required 15-foot landscape buffer area is not provided along the east property
line and a waiver has been requested to provide relief from this requirement. The landscape plan
does not indicate the buffer area trees along the south property line, but a site visit and aerial
images indicate that the required landscape is existing and in place as required.
Street Name
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
El Capitan Way
Town Center
Arterial
Durango Drive
Parkway Arterial
Governing Document
Town Center
Development Standards
Manual
Town Center
Development Standards
Manual and Master Plan
of Streets and Highways
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Compliance
with Street
Section
80
120
FS

Staff Report Page Eighteen
Parkway Arterial
Arterial
Required
9.6-foot detached
sidewalk and 5-foot
amenity zone
5-foot detached sidewalk
with a 2.6-foot amenity
zone
Provided
10-foot detached
sidewalk and 5-foot
amenity zone
10-foot detached
sidewalk and 5-foot
amenity zone
Compliance
Y
The existing streetscape improvements were installed with a previous project.
Parking Requirement
Required
Provided
Compliance
Parking
Parking
Use
Parking
HandiHandiGross Floor
Ratio
Regular
Regular
capped
capped
Area
Convenience
1 space per
Store with
3,750 sf
250 Gross
15
Fuel Pumps
Floor Area
One space
per 150 feet
Carwash, Full
of gross
Service or
2,310 sf
floor area
16
Auto
and 6 car
Detailing
stacking
lane
1 space
Auto Smog
independent
N/A
1
Check
of stacking
lanes
32
28
Y
2
2
Y
Loading
6,060 sf
1
1
1
Y
Spaces
The subject site is a part of a larger commercial subdivision which allows for reciprocal parking.
The proposal does not increase the overall amount of parking required for the existing shopping
center. The original site plan indicates a total of 1,137 parking spaces provided where 1,081
were required.
FS

Staff Report Page Nineteen
Waivers
Requirement
15-foot landscaped buffer
Request
Waiver to allow twofoot of landscape buffer
for a portion of the east
property line where 15
feet is required.
Denial
FS
A 7 7 A
A 7 7 A b A 7
SUP-65414
b 7
A 7 7
7 7 7 A 77 b 7 b A 7
7A 7 A A
7 7 A 7 7A A
777771 777 777 777b 7b 7

7b 77777777777 7
7 7777 77777 77
7 777 77
b b b
7777 7 7777 7 77b 7 7
A A
7 7 77
b 7
77
7
71
77 77
7 777777
b 7
7 7 777b 77
A 7
AbA

A
A A
A b A 77 7
A 7 7 b 7 b 7 A 7 b A A
A 7 7 7 A 7 7A 7 b A A 7 A
7 7 b 7 b 7 A 77b A 7 A 7 7 7 A
A 7 77 7777 7 7 7
7 77
b 7 77 b 7
b 7 7 7 7 7
7A 77
77
7 b
7A 7
A 7
7 7 A 77b 7
b 7 b A 7
A 7 7 7 7 77
b 7 7A 7
7b A 7
7A
A b A 7 A 7 7b 7
b 7 A 7 A
A 7 77 7A A b 7
b 7A 7 A 7
7 7
7A 7 A A b
A 7 b A 7 7
b 7 A 7
A 7 7 7b A 7 77
7 7
b 7 A 7 A 7
7 7
7A 7 A A b
7777 777777 7 7 7777777777 71 7777777b 7777
77 777777 77 77 777777777777 77 77
777777777777
77 177 77777 77
7 77
7 A 7 7
A 777 777777 7777
SUP-65414
b
7
7 777
77 77
7 77
77
b 7
AA 7
7 7
AbA
77
A 7
A77A77
77 777 7 77
7
7 7 7 7 7
7 77
7 7
777
b A77
b A 7
7 A
7 7
A 7
b A A7A
Ab A
A A A 7A
A A 7
b A
b 7A
b A 7A
A 7 A 7
b A 7 A
A
A 7
A 7
7A
A
77
7777777b
77
777777777777777777777777777
b A7
b
b A
A 7 7 7 A 7
7A
A 7 7 7 A7
7A
7 7b
A 7 A 7 7A 7 7
77 A 7
Ab b 7A7 7
A 7A b b 7A 7 7
A 7A 7 7
7 b 7 7 A 7
7
bb7
A7
A77b7
77
b
b77
A7
A
A 7 7 7b 7 7b 7 7A 7 A
b b 7 77A7 777 7 77
b A 7 A 77 777 77 777
777 A 777
7 A 7 A b 777
A 7A 7 7
b A7 7 7 777 b A 7
b b 7 7 7 7
b A 7 A 7 7 b
7b b 7A
7 7b
A
b 7 777A 7
A77A
7b
A 7 b 7A 7 7b 7 7 7 77
777A 77 7 7 b 7 7A 7 7 A b
7 7 77 b 7 7 77 777
b A b
AA A7 A
A 7
A 7
7
7
7A Ab
b A
A A A 7A
7 7
7
A 7
b A A
A b A
7 A 7
b A 7
A 7 A
7 7 A
b A 7 A
A A
b 7A
7 A b 7
A A
A 7
A 7
7 A
A 7 7
7 A
A
77
A 7
b A
b A 7
A 7A
7
A 7
A7
b A 7 A
b
A 7A 77b A A
A 7
7b
7A7A77bAA
7A7
SUP-65414, SUP-65415, SUP-65416, SUP-65417, SUP-65418 and SDR-65550
A 77 A 7
7 A 7 7
77b A A 7 A
7 7 7
A 7 A 7 777777

A A
A
A 7
7
7
7A
A 7 7
A 7 A 7

7 A
7A
A b b
7
7
7 7A
7 A A 7A
b A
A
7 A 7 7
7 7

b
7
7Ab b

A 7 7 7A
7"
7
7
b b A 7 A 7A 7b b A 7
b A
77
77b A A 7 A
b A b
AA A7 A
A 7
A 7
7
7
" 7A Ab
b A
A A A 7A
7 7
7
"A 7
b A A
A b A
7 A 7
b A 7
A 7 A
7 7 A
b A 7 A
A A
b 7A
7 A b 7
A A
A 7
A 7
7 A
A 7 7
7 A
""A
77
""A 7
b A
b A 7
A 7A
7
A 7
A7
b A 7
7 A
7 7
"A 7
b A A7A
A b A
A A A7A
A A 7
b A
b 7A
b A 7A
A 7 A 7
b A 7 A
A
A 7
A 7
7A
A
7 7 7
A7 A7 777777
7
bb7
A7
A77b7
7
b
b77
A7
A
b A 7
77
7777777b
77
777777777777777777777777777
"
b A
" 7 A 7 7A 7 A
7b A 7Ab 7 Ab
7 A 7

A " 7
7 A
b
7
7
7A
b
b A
b A 7 A
7b
7A7A77bAA
7A7
b
A 7A 77b A A
A 7
A A
A
A 7
7
7
7A
A 7 7
A 7 A 7
bb7
b
b77
A7
A7
A
A77b7
7A
77
7b
7A7A77bAA
7A7
AbA7A7
77
bb7
A7
b77
b
A77b7
A7
A
b7A7
AbA7A
7b
7A7A77bAA
7A7
bb7
b77
b
A7
A7
A
A77b7
7A
77
7b
7A7A77bAA
7A7
bb7
b77
b
A7
A7
A
A77b7
7A
77
7b
7A7A77bAA
7A7
bb7
b
b77
A7
A7
A
A77b7
%7A
77
7b
7A7A77bAA
7A7
SUP-65414 [PRJ-64494] SPECIAL USE PERMIT RELATED TO SUP-65415, SUP-65416, SUP-65417,

SUP-65418 AND SDR-65550 - APPLICANT: D F DURANGO, LLC - OWNER: DURANGO I-95, LLC
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF DURANGO DRIVE AND EL CAPITAN WAY
06/30/16

06/30/16

06/30/16

06/30/16

06/30/16
77
b777
7
777
7777
77b77b7b777b
A77
77777)7777777A
7777777777777777
77
7777b
7777777777777777
7777777777777777777
77777777077777777)77
777777777777777777777
77 77b77777777777777
77777777b777077b77A77
7b7777777777777777
77777777777777
777777777777777777777
77777777A777Ab777777
7777777777777777777
7777)7777777777
7777
bA77
77AA77A
7
7777
SUP-65414, SUP-65415, SUP-65416, SUP-65417,

SUP-65418 and SDR-65550

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
SUP-65415 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT RELATED TO SUP-65414 - PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT: D F DURANGO, LLC - OWNER: DURANGO I-95, LLC - For possible action
on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED 6,278 SQUARE-FOOT
CONVENIENCE STORE (WITH FUEL PUMPS) on the southwest corner of Durango Drive
and El Capitan Way (APN 125-17-612-012), T-C (Town Center) Zone [SC-TC (Service
Commercial - Town Center) Special Land Use Designation], Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-64494]. Staff
recommends DENIAL.
RECOMMENDATION:

paper use, backup
A 7 7 A
A 7 7 A b A 7
SUP-65415
b 7
A 7 7
7 7 7 A 77 b 7 b A 7
7A 7 A A
7 7 A 7 7A A
777771 777 777 777b 7b 7

7b 77777777777 7
7 7777 77777 77
7 777 77
b b b
7777 7 7777 7 77b 7 7
A A
7 7 77
b 7
77
7
71
77 77
7 777777
b 7
7 7 777b 77
A 7
AbA

A
A A
A b A 77 7
A 7 7 b 7 b 7 A 7 b A A
A 7 7 7 A 7 7A 7 b A A 7 A
7 7 b 7 b 7 A 77b A 7 A 7 7 7 A
A 7 77 7777 7 7 7
7 77
b 7 77 b 7
b 7 7 7 7 7
7A 77
77
7 b
7A 7
A 7
7 7 A 77b 7
b 7 b A 7
A 7 7 7 7 77
b 7 7A 7
7b A 7
7A
A b A 7 A 7 7b 7
b 7 A 7 A
A 7 77 7A A b 7
b 7A 7 A 7
7 7
7A 7 A A b
A 7 b A 7 7
b 7 A 7
A 7 7 7b A 7 77
7 7
b 7 A 7 A 7
7 7
7A 7 A A b
7777 777777 7 7 7777777777 71 7777777b 7777
77 777777 77 77 777777777777 77 77
777777777777
77 177 77777 77
7 77
7 A 7 7
A 777 777777 7777
SUP-65415
b
7
7 777
77 77
7 77
77
b 7
AA 7
7 7
AbA
77
A 7
A77A77
77 777 7 77
7
7 7 7 7 7
7 77
7 7
777

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
SUP-65416 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT RELATED TO SUP-65414 AND SUP-65415 - PUBLIC
HEARING - APPLICANT: D F DURANGO, LLC - OWNER: DURANGO I-95, LLC - For
possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED GAMING
ESTABLISHMENT, RESTRICTED LICENSE IN A PROPOSED 6,278 SQUARE-FOOT
CONVENIENCE STORE (WITH FUEL PUMPS) on the southwest corner of Durango Drive
and El Capitan Way (APN 125-17-612-012), T-C (Town Center) Zone [SC-TC (Service
Commercial - Town Center) Special Land Use Designation], Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-64494]. Staff
recommends DENIAL.
RECOMMENDATION:
2. Special Map
4. Protest Postcard SUP-65416 and SUP-65417 [PRJ-64494]

paper use, backup
A 7 7 A
A 7 7 A b A 7
SUP-65416
b 7
A 7 7
7 7 7 A 77 b 7 b A 7
7A 7 A A
7 7 A 7 7A A
777771 777 777 777b 7b 7

7b 77777777777 7
7 7777 77777 77
7 777 77
b b b
7777 7 7777 7 77b 7 7
A A
7 7 77
b 7
77
7
71
77 77
7 777777
b 7
7 7 777b 77
A 7
AbA

A
A A
A b A 77 7
A 7 7 b 7 b 7 A 7 b A A
A 7 7 7 A 7 7A 7 b A A 7 A
7 7 b 7 b 7 A 77b A 7 A 7 7 7 A
A 7 77 7777 7 7 7
7 77
b 7 77 b 7
b 7 7 7 7 7
7A 77
77
7 b
7A 7
A 7
7 7 A 77b 7
b 7 b A 7
A 7 7 7 7 77
b 7 7A 7
7b A 7
7A
A b A 7 A 7 7b 7
b 7 A 7 A
A 7 77 7A A b 7
b 7A 7 A 7
7 7
7A 7 A A b
A 7 b A 7 7
b 7 A 7
A 7 7 7b A 7 77
7 7
b 7 A 7 A 7
7 7
7A 7 A A b
7777 777777 7 7 7777777777 71 7777777b 7777
77 777777 77 77 777777777777 77 77
777777777777
77 177 77777 77
7 77
7 A 7 7
A 777 777777 7777
SUP-65416
b
7
7 777
77 77
7 77
77
b 7
AA 7
7 7
AbA
77
A 7
A77A77
77 777 7 77
7
7 7 7 7 7
7 77
7 7
777

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
SUP-65417 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT RELATED TO SUP-65414, SUP-65415 AND SUP65416 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: D F DURANGO, LLC - OWNER: DURANGO I95, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED CAR
WASH, FULL SERVICE OR AUTO DETAILING IN CONJUNCTION WITH A PROPOSED
6,278 SQUARE-FOOT CONVENIENCE STORE (WITH FUEL PUMPS) WITH A WAIVER
TO ALLOW SERVICE BAY DOORS TO FRONT A RIGHT-OF-WAY WHERE SUCH IS
NOT ALLOWED on the southwest corner of Durango Drive and El Capitan Way (APN 125-17612-012), T-C (Town Center) Zone [SC-TC (Service Commercial - Town Center) Special Land
Use Designation], Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-64494]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
RECOMMENDATION:

paper use, backup
A 7 7 A
A 7 7 A b A 7
SUP-65417
b 7
A 7 7
7 7 7 A 77 b 7 b A 7
7A 7 A A
7 7 A 7 7A A
777771 777 777 777b 7b 7

7b 77777777777 7
7 7777 77777 77
7 777 77
b b b
7777 7 7777 7 77b 7 7
A A
7 7 77
b 7
77
7
71
77 77
7 777777
b 7
7 7 777b 77
A 7
AbA

A
A A
A b A 77 7
A 7 7 b 7 b 7 A 7 b A A
A 7 7 7 A 7 7A 7 b A A 7 A
7 7 b 7 b 7 A 77b A 7 A 7 7 7 A
A 7 77 7777 7 7 7
7 77
b 7 77 b 7
b 7 7 7 7 7
7A 77
77
7 b
7A 7
A 7
7 7 A 77b 7
b 7 b A 7
A 7 7 7 7 77
b 7 7A 7
7b A 7
7A
A b A 7 A 7 7b 7
b 7 A 7 A
A 7 77 7A A b 7
b 7A 7 A 7
7 7
7A 7 A A b
A 7 b A 7 7
b 7 A 7
A 7 7 7b A 7 77
7 7
b 7 A 7 A 7
7 7
7A 7 A A b
7777 777777 7 7 7777777777 71 7777777b 7777
77 777777 77 77 777777777777 77 77
777777777777
77 177 77777 77
7 77
7 A 7 7
A 777 777777 7777
SUP-65417
b
7
7 777
77 77
7 77
77
b 7
AA 7
7 7
AbA
77
A 7
A77A77
77 777 7 77
7
7 7 7 7 7
7 77
7 7
777

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
SUP-65418 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT RELATED TO SUP-65414, SUP-65415, SUP-65416
AND SUP-65417 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: D F DURANGO, LLC - OWNER:
DURANGO I-95, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR A
PROPOSED AUTO SMOG CHECK IN CONJUNCTION WITH A PROPOSED 6,278
SQUARE-FOOT CONVENIENCE STORE (WITH FUEL PUMPS) on the northwest corner of
Durango Drive and El Capitan Way (APN 125-17-612-012), T-C (Town Center) Zone [SC-TC
(Service Commercial - Town Center) Special Land Use Designation], Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ64494]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
RECOMMENDATION:

paper use, backup
A 7 7 A
A 7 7 A b A 7
SUP-65418
b 7
A 7 7
7 7 7 A 77 b 7 b A 7
7A 7 A A
7 7 A 7 7A A
777771 777 777 777b 7b 7

7b 77777777777 7
7 7777 77777 77
7 777 77
b b b
7777 7 7777 7 77b 7 7
A A
7 7 77
b 7
77
7
71
77 77
7 777777
b 7
7 7 777b 77
A 7
AbA

A
A A
A b A 77 7
A 7 7 b 7 b 7 A 7 b A A
A 7 7 7 A 7 7A 7 b A A 7 A
7 7 b 7 b 7 A 77b A 7 A 7 7 7 A
A 7 77 7777 7 7 7
7 77
b 7 77 b 7
b 7 7 7 7 7
7A 77
77
7 b
7A 7
A 7
7 7 A 77b 7
b 7 b A 7
A 7 7 7 7 77
b 7 7A 7
7b A 7
7A
A b A 7 A 7 7b 7
b 7 A 7 A
A 7 77 7A A b 7
b 7A 7 A 7
7 7
7A 7 A A b
A 7 b A 7 7
b 7 A 7
A 7 7 7b A 7 77
7 7
b 7 A 7 A 7
7 7
7A 7 A A b
7777 777777 7 7 7777777777 71 7777777b 7777
77 777777 77 77 777777777777 77 77
777777777777
77 177 77777 77
7 77
7 A 7 7
A 777 777777 7777
SUP-65418
b
7
7 777
77 77
7 77
77
b 7
AA 7
7 7
AbA
77
A 7
A77A77
77 777 7 77
7
7 7 7 7 7
7 77
7 7
777

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
SDR-65550 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO SUP-65414, SUP65415, SUP-65416, SUP-65417 AND SUP-65418 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: D F
DURANGO, LLC - OWNER: DURANGO I-95, LLC - For possible action on a request for a
Major Amendment to a previously approved Site Plan (SDR-20496) FOR A PROPOSED 6,278
SQUARE-FOOT CONVENIENCE STORE (WITH FUEL PUMPS) WITH A CAR WASH, A
WAIVER OF THE TOWN CENTER DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS MANUAL AND
TITLE 19.08 TO ALLOW A COMMERCIAL BUILDING TO BE LOCATED AWAY FROM
PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND A WAIVER FOR A REDUCTION OF PERIMETER
LANDSCAPING on 3.71 acres at the northwest corner of Durango Drive and El Capitan Way
(APN 125-17-214-012), T-C (Town Center) Zone [SC-TC (Service Commercial - Town Center)
Special Land Use Designation], Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-64494]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
RECOMMENDATION:

paper use, backup
A 7 7 A
A 7 7 A b A 7
b 7
SDR-65550
A 7 7
7 7 7 A 77 b 7 b A 7
7A 7 A A
7 7 A 7 7A A
777772 777 777 777b 7b 7

7b 77777777777 7
7 7777 77777 77
7 777 77
b b b
7777 7 7777 7 77b 7 7
A A
7 7 77
b 7
77
7
72
77 77
7 777777
b 7
7 7 777b 77
A 7
AbA

A
A A
A b A 77 7
A 7 7 b 7 b 7 A 7 b A A
A 7 7 7 A 7 7A 7 b A A 7 A
7 7 b 7 b 7 A 77b A 7 A 7 7 7 A
A 7 77 7777 7 7 7
7 77
b 7 77 b 7
b 7 7 7 7 7
7A 77
77
7 b
7A 7
A 7
7 7 A 77b 7
b 7 b A 7
A 7 7 7 7 77
b 7 7A 7
7b A 7
7A
A b A 7 A 7 7b 7
b 7 A 7 A
A 7 77 7A A b 7
b 7A 7 A 7
7 7
7A 7 A A b
A 7 b A 7 7
b 7 A 7
A 7 7 7b A 7 77
7 7
b 7 A 7 A 7
7 7
7A 7 A A b
7777 777777 7 7 7777777777 72 7777777b 7777
77 777777 77 77 777777777777 77 77
777777777777
77 277 77777 77
7 77
7 A 7 7
A 777 777777 7777
SDR-65550
b
7
7 777
77 77
7 77
77
b 7
AA 7
7 7
AbA
77
A 7
A77A77
77 777 7 77
7
7 7 7 7 7
7 77
7 7
777

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
SUP-65429 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER:
WESTCARE FOUNDATION, INC. - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit
FOR AN 87-UNIT CONVALESCENT CARE FACILITY/NURSING HOME (OCCUPIED BY
NO MORE THAN 87 ADULT PATIENTS AND AN AVERAGE OF 87 RELATED MINOR
CHILDREN OF NOT MORE THAN NINE YEARS OF AGE) at the southwest corner of
Duncan Drive and Bradley Road (APN 138-12-110-056), R-E (Residence Estates) Zone, Ward 5
(Barlow) [PRJ-65237]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommend APPROVAL, subject to conditions:
1. Location and Aerial Maps - SUP-65429 and SDR-65430 [PRJ-65237]
2. Conditions and Staff Report - SUP-65429 and SDR-65430 [PRJ-65237]
3. Supporting Documentation - SUP-65429 and SDR-65430 [PRJ-65237]
4. Photo(s) - SUP-65429 and SDR-65430 [PRJ-65237]
5. Justification Letter - SUP-65429 and SDR-65430 [PRJ-65237]
6. Protest/Support Postcards - SUP-65429 and SDR-65430 [PRJ-65237]
SUP-65429 and SDR-65430 [PRJ-65237]

DEPARTMENT:
PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: WESTCARE FOUNDATION, INC.
CASE
NUMBER
SUP-65429
SDR-65430
RECOMMENDATION
REQUIRED FOR
APPROVAL
SUP-65429
** NOTIFICATION **
NOTICES MAILED
209
APPROVALS
PROTESTS
16
SS
SUP-65429 and SDR-65430 [PRJ-65237]

Conditions Page One
** CONDITIONS **
Planning
1.
The previous Special Use Permit approval (SUP-59938) shall be expunged upon final
approval of SUP-65429.
2.
The total number of convalescent beds within the facility shall be limited to 87.
3.
The maximum length of stay by any one person shall be limited to 18 months.
4.
No child over the age of 9 shall be allowed to reside on premise. The operator shall
maintain a list of children residing onsite.
5.
Visitors shall only be allowed during the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m.
6.
Conformance to all Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.12 for a Convalescent
Care Facility/Nursing Home use.
7.
8.
9.
Safety.
10.
11.
SS
SUP-65429 and SDR-65430 [PRJ-65237]

Conditions Page Two
Planning
1.
The previous Site Development Plan Review approval (SDR-59939) shall be expunged
upon final approval of SDR-65430.
2.
A revised site plan shall be submitted to the Department of Planning prior to the submittal
of building permits reflecting the updated unit type counts and associated bed counts
conforming to conditions of approval for SUP-65429.
3.
The perimeter wall shall be eight feet in height and shall be constructed to match the
existing wall found on the adjacent commercial property to the south. The perimeter wall
shall be installed along both Bradley Road and Duncan Drive.
4.
A security gate shall be required on Duncan Drive and allowed to be open between the
hours of 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. and closed during all other hours.
5.
Landscaping shall be installed behind the sidewalk in conformance with the submitted
landscape date plan stamped 06/27/16.
6.
The applicant shall submit a security plan to the Department of Planning for review and
approval administratively.
7.
8.
All development shall be in conformance with the site plan, landscape plan and building
elevations, date stamped 06/27/16, except as amended by conditions herein.
9.
All provided handicap-accessible parking spaces shall conform to Title 19 dimensional

requirements.
10.
Safety.
11.
SS
SUP-65429 and SDR-65430 [PRJ-65237]

12.
action shall be completed and recorded prior to the issuance of any building permits.
13.

Provide additional 24-inch box trees in the north and south perimeter buffers to meet the
maximum spacing requirement of one tree per 20 linear feet. Alternatively, provide 24inch box trees at 20-foot intervals.
14.
15.
Public Works
16.
Prior to the issuance of any building permits, dedicate a 15-foot radius at the southwest
corner of Bradley Road and Duncan Drive. Additionally, dedicate a radius acceptable to
the City of Las Vegas Traffic Engineer at the intersection of Duncan Road and Helen
Avenue and grant Public Pedestrian Access Easements for any public sidewalk areas not
within the public right-of-way.
17.
Construct half-street improvements including appropriate transitional paving on Duncan

Drive, and Bradley Road adjacent to this site concurrent with development of this site.
Install all appurtenant underground facilities, if any, adjacent to this site needed for the
future traffic signal system concurrent with development of this site. Extend all required
underground utilities, such as electrical, telephone, etc., located within public rights-ofway, past the boundaries of this site prior to construction of hard surfacing (asphalt or
concrete). All existing paving damaged or removed by this development shall be restored
at its original location and to its original width concurrent with development of this site.
18.
Construct the full width of the adjacent alley per current city standards concurrent with onsite development activities. Alternatively, vacate the entire length of the alley along the rear
of this site to Rancho Drive.
SS
SUP-65429 and SDR-65430 [PRJ-65237]

19.
Unless otherwise allowed by the City Engineer, construct sidewalk on at least one side of
all access drives connecting this site to the adjacent public streets concurrent with
development of this site. The connecting sidewalk shall extend from the sidewalk on the
public street to the first intersection of the on-site roadway network and shall be terminated
on-site with a handicap ramp.
20.
This site shall connect to the 36-inch sewer line in Bradley Road at an existing or new
manhole.
21.
Landscape and maintain all unimproved rights-of-way, if any, adjacent to this site. All
22.
Submit an Encroachment Agreement for landscaping and private improvements in the

Duncan Drive and Bradley Road public rights of way prior to this issuance of permits for
these improvements. The applicant must carry an insurance policy for the term of the
encroaching in the public right- of way at the applicant's expense pursuant to the terms of
improvements in the public right of way shall be the responsibility of the adjacent property
owner(s) and shall be transferred with the sale of the property for the entire term of the
23.
This site is in a Federal Emergency Management Area (FEMA) designated flood zone. A
Drainage Plan and Technical Drainage Study must be submitted to and approved by the
Additionally, a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) must be obtained from
FEMA prior to the issuance of any construction permits.
SS
SUP-65429 and SDR-65430 [PRJ-65237]

** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is requesting approval of a proposed transitional living facility for women and
children on a 4.69-acre R-E (Residence Estates) zoned parcel at the southwest corner of Duncan
Drive and Bradley Road. The request also proposes access from the adjacent parcel, which is
zoned C-2 (General Commercial).
The related applications were heard and approved by the City Council on 10/21/15. Although
the approvals are still valid, the City is requiring that they be reheard to provide specific notice to
the public that the facility is to contain no more than 87 units to be occupied by no more than 87
adult patients and an average of 87 related minor children of not more than nine years of age.
ISSUES
These items were originally approved on 10/21/15. The City Council, by conditions of
approval, limited the total number of beds to 87, the maximum length of stay to 18 months,
and the hours of visitation from 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. In addition, the City Council
stipulated that no child over the age of nine shall be allowed to reside on the premises and
that the operator shall maintain a list of children residing onsite.
The same plans as were previously approved were again submitted for this proposal.
Conditions of approval are recommended that will ensure conformance to the Unified
Development Code. The same conditions will again be imposed on the development as were
stipulated through SUP-59938 and SDR-59939 by the City Council.
A Convalescent Care/Nursing Home use is permitted in the R-E (Residence Estates) zoning
district with the approval of a Special Use Permit.
Title 19 requires additional trees in the north and south perimeter buffers. A condition of
approval addresses this requirement.
An unimproved public alley is located along the south property line. The alley must either be
improved to current standards or vacated and made part of the site.
ANALYSIS
Development is subject to Title 19 standards for the R-E (Residence Estates) District and use
requirements for a Convalescent Care Facility/Nursing Home. This use allows for Community
Residence-type uses such as transitional living facilities with a greater number of residents than
that use category would normally allow. The existing General Plan designation for this site is O
(Office), which was intended for a previously approved commercial/office development that was
ultimately not constructed. The General Plan does not need to be amended to match the current
SS
SUP-65429 and SDR-65430 [PRJ-65237]

zoning district. The site is also located within the 330-foot buffer radius of two rural preservation
neighborhoods. Per Title 19.10.180, the radius is intended to protect rural properties from being
rezoned to a greater density or intensity. As rezoning of this site is not requested, no special
standards apply as a result of the sites location within the buffer areas.
The site is bordered on the east by 18,000 to 20,000 square-foot single-family residential lots, on
the north by a Convalescent Care Facility, on the west by a Social Service Provider (also
operated by the applicant) and on the south by office buildings. No social services would be
provided on this site; rather, these uses are provided on the adjoining parcel to the west. Ingress
and egress is proposed from Duncan Drive through the adjacent parcel, with secondary egress to
Bradley Road through a crash gate. Both streets are 60-foot rights-of-way (Minor Collectors)
that are not fully improved. Access to the site would be gated for privacy and protection of the
residents. Site amenities include community gardens, play areas and two multi-purpose storage
buildings. A Special Use Permit is required in the R-E zoning district for a Convalescent Care
Facility/Nursing Home; all minimum use requirements are met by the proposal.
The site is intended to be integrated with the applicants development on the adjacent parcel to
the west, which contains a Social Service Provider use. Although related, the intention is for the
overall site to remain as two separate parcels to maintain separation between commercial and
residential land uses. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the current parcel must be
remapped to eliminate previously platted lot lines that will be in conflict with the proposed
building locations. A condition of approval of the Site Development Plan Review addresses this
issue.
Title 19.18 defines a Convalescent Care/Nursing Home use as A building or structure designed,
used, or intended to be used to house and provide care for persons who have a chronic physical
or mental illness or infirmity, but who do not need medical, surgical or other specialized
treatment normally provided by a hospital. This use includes a rest home and nursing home,
as well as a use that would qualify as a Community Residence except for the limitation on the
number of residents, but does not include an assisted living apartment, hospital or other
medical facility that is specifically defined in LVMC Chapter 19.18.
The proposed use meets the definition, as the residents are in need of counseling but do not need
medical treatment. The use would normally qualify as a Community Residence; however, that
use limits the number of residents to 10. According to the applicant, these residences would
allow for mothers and their minor children to transition from emergency housing to economic
and social self-sufficiency and onto permanent housing at other locations. The average length of
stay would range from six to eighteen months. Through the previous approval of this request,
the City Council conditioned a maximum length of stay of 18 months; this will again be imposed
as a condition of approval.
The Minimum Special Use Permit Requirements for this use in the R-E zoning district include:
SS
SUP-65429 and SDR-65430 [PRJ-65237]

1. The minimum parcel size shall be 20,000 square feet.

The proposed use meets this requirement, as the subject parcel is 204,296 square feet in
size.
2. The maximum number of beds per acre shall be 25.
The proposed use meets this requirement, as 18 beds per acre would be provided (total of
87 beds on 4.69 acres). The submitted plans show that 123 beds would be provided,
which exceeds 25 beds per acre. However, conditions of approval will again be imposed
limiting the number of beds to 87 and submittal of a site plan that adjusts the unit count
and number of beds to conform to the SUP approval.
3. Setbacks for buildings shall be the same as required for a single family dwelling in the
zoning district where located.
The proposed use meets this requirement, as the buildings adhere to the same setbacks
required in the R-E (Residence Estates) zoning district.
4. The maximum building height shall be two stories.
The proposed use meets this requirement, as the residential and accessory buildings are
one story in height.
5. The facility must be located on a collector street or larger.
The proposed use meets this requirement, as Duncan Drive and Bradley Road are both
Minor Collectors with dedicated 60-foot rights-of-way. Half-street improvements will
need to be completed as part of this project.
The proposed single-story apartment buildings are appropriate adjacent to the existing lowdensity residential uses and single-story office buildings. They are well below the 3:1 proximity
slope requirement for developments adjacent to single-family dwellings. Wide setbacks have
been provided along Duncan Drive and Bradley Road, and open space has been provided
throughout the site.
A sufficient number of trees to meet perimeter landscape buffer requirements along the north and
south property lines is not being provided. A variety of larger 36-inch box trees are proposed,
which accounts for some of the deficit. Additional 24-inch box trees could be provided to ensure
conformance with Title 19. Trees are missing along the drainage culvert adjacent to the
residential buildings. A condition of approval addresses the deficiencies.
SS
SUP-65429 and SDR-65430 [PRJ-65237]

The Department of Public Works notes that there are several underlying lot lines on this site and
recommends that the applicant coordinate with the City Surveyor and other city staff to
determine the most appropriate mapping action necessary to consolidate the existing lots. It
further notes that a previous Parcel Map (PMP-52637) on the site adjacent to this one, APN
138-12-210-036, was submitted but has not to date been recorded.
A drainage culvert is identified on the rear of the site. This is currently a public alley and as such
should be either improved or vacated. Based on staff research, it appears that the alley was
dedicated entirely from this parcel (Page 4, Book 86), so vacating it would result in the entire
alley being returned to this site.
The Las Vegas Valley Water District (LVVWD) had previously submitted the following
comments in regard to this site:
This parcel is not currently served by LVVWD. Civil and plumbing plans will need to be
submitted to LVVWD for domestic meter sizing, available fire flow, and installation of required
backflow prevention.
Site development is in conformance with Title 19 requirements, with the exception of the
provision of an inadequate number of buffer trees along the perimeter of the property. Staff
recommends providing the minimum number of trees on each side. The site adequately balances
the residential buildings with open space and amenities, and development is compatible with the
uses on surrounding parcels. The number of beds should be reduced from 123 to 87 in keeping
with the previous approvals. Staff recommends approval with conditions.
1.
The use qualifies as a Convalescent Care Facility by virtue of providing transitional living
quarters and amenities that can accommodate more persons than a Community Residence
as defined by Title 19. Adequate screening, building setbacks and single-story height
contribute to its compatibility with the surrounding properties.
2.
SS
SUP-65429 and SDR-65430 [PRJ-65237]

The site is currently undeveloped and can accommodate 87 living units for 87 adult
patients and an average of 87 related minor children of not more than nine years of age.
3.
Duncan Drive and Bradley Road are both 60-foot Minor Collectors as described by Title
13. Half-street improvements are needed to extend the roadways to their intended widths.
4.
General Plan.
The proposed Convalescent Care Facility will be subject to licensing inspection, thereby
protecting the public health, safety and general welfare.
5.
All five minimum Special Use Permit requirements pertaining to the Convalescent Care
Facility in the R-E (Residence Estates) District are met by the proposal for accommodation
of 87 units for 87 adult patients and an average of 87 related minor children of not more
than nine years of age.
1.

The residential complex is being developed to integrate with the existing Social Service
Provider to the west; however, the two parcels are intended to remain separate. The
proposed single-story apartment buildings are appropriate adjacent to the existing lowdensity residential and single-story office buildings. Adequate open space is provided.
2.
SS
SUP-65429 and SDR-65430 [PRJ-65237]

Perimeter buffer trees are missing along the north and south property lines. The applicant
must correct this as a condition of approval. In addition, the provided handicapped parking
spaces do not meet the dimensional requirements of the Unified Development Code and
must be corrected on the plans submitted for building permit.
3.

Ingress and egress is proposed from Duncan Drive through the adjacent parcel, with
secondary egress to Bradley Road through a crash gate. Access to the site is gated for
privacy and protection of the residents. Vehicular traffic is not expected to be high in this
area nor negatively affect traffic in this neighborhood.
4.
The residential buildings feature painted stucco exteriors with metal accents and flat roofs.
Windows are prominently featured. The applicant may want to consider reducing the
quantity of windows to reduce heat gain and increase privacy.
5.

The proposed single-story building elevations are aesthetically pleasing and are compatible
with low-density, single-story dwellings in this neighborhood.
6.
general welfare.
Site development will be subject to requirements for building permit and will include
building and business licensing inspections, thereby safeguarding the public health, safety
and general welfare.
The Planning Commission struck a request for a General Plan Amendment
(GPA-5195) to amend a portion of the Centennial Hills Interlocal Land Use
11/18/04
Plan of the General Plan from DR (Desert Rural Density Residential) to MLA
(Medium Low Attached Density Residential) on 5.21 acres at the southwest
corner of Duncan Drive and Bradley Road. Staff had recommended denial.
SS
SUP-65429 and SDR-65430 [PRJ-65237]


The Planning Commission voted to Withdraw Without Prejudice a request for
a Rezoning (ZON-6379) from R-E (Residence Estates) to R-PD9 (Residential
Planned Development 9 Units per Acre) on 5.21 acres at the southwest
corner of Duncan Drive and Bradley Road. Staff had recommended denial.
05/12/05
a Site Development Plan Review (SDR-6381) for 12 proposed fourplex multifamily buildings on 5.21 acres at the southwest corner of Duncan Drive and
Bradley Road. Staff had recommended denial.
a General Plan Amendment (GPA-6270) from DR (Desert Rural Density
05/26/05
Residential) to MLA (Medium Low Attached Density Residential) on 5.21
acres at the southwest corner of Duncan Drive and Bradley Road. Staff had
recommended denial.
The City Council approved a General Plan Amendment (GPA-12367) from
DR (Desert Rural Density Residential) to O (Office) on 5.21 acres at the
southwest corner of Duncan Drive and Bradley Road. The applicant had
requested an amendment to GC (General Commercial). The Planning
Commission recommended approval. Staff recommended denial.
The City Council approved a Rezoning (ZON-12370) from R-E (Residence
Estates) to O (Office) on 5.21 acres at the southwest corner of Duncan Drive
and Bradley Road. The applicant had requested a Rezoning to C-2 (General
Commercial). The Planning Commission recommended approval. Staff
recommended denial. The Resolution of Intent expired 06/21/08.
06/21/06
The City Council approved a Variance (VAR-12921) to allow an eight-foot
corner side yard setback where 15 feet is the minimum on 5.21 acres at the
southwest corner of Duncan Drive and Bradley Road. The Planning
Commission recommended approval. Staff recommended denial. The
approval expired 06/21/08.
for a proposed 57,535 square-foot commercial/office development and a
waiver of perimeter landscape buffer requirements on 5.21 acres at the
southwest corner of Duncan Drive and Bradley Road. The Planning
Commission recommended approval. Staff recommended denial. The
approval expired 06/21/08.
A Boundary Line Adjustment (BLA-16051) between APN 138-12-110-048
(5649 Duncan Drive) and APN 138-12-210-034 (5659 Duncan Drive) was
10/10/06
recorded, with a transfer area of 23,790 square feet. This reduced the size of
the subject property from 5.21 acres to 4.69 acres.
A Code Enforcement Case (140483) was opened to investigate a complaint
04/25/14
about dumped tree cuttings on APN 138-12-110-056. The case was resolved
05/11/14 by Code Enforcement.
SS
SUP-65429 and SDR-65430 [PRJ-65237]


for an 87-bed Convalescent Care Facility/Nursing Home at the southeast
corner of Duncan Drive and Bradley Road. The Planning Commission and
staff recommended approval.
10/21/2015
(SDR-59939) for an 87-bed, single-story, 57,999 square-foot Convalescent
Care Facility/Nursing Home at the southeast corner of Duncan Drive and
Bradley Road. The Planning Commission and staff recommended approval.

08/10/06

There are no building permits or business licenses related to this site.
Submittal requirements for a Special Use Permit and Site Development Plan
Review were discussed with the applicant in 2015. The applicant brought in a
newer plan that addressed many of staffs prior issues. Public Works and Fire
06/23/15
Engineering both noted that the gated entry needed to meet Standard Drawing
#222A design to prevent congestion into the right-of-way and to allow for
turnarounds. The applicant indicated that several neighborhood meetings had
already been conducted, with attendees generally supporting the project.
A neighborhood was not required, nor was one held for the current requests. A previous
neighborhood meeting was held 07/27/15 to discuss this development. The meeting was held at
The Hideaway, located at 3369 Thom Boulevard in Las Vegas. There were 35 members of the
public, three members of the development team, two members from the City Council office and
one member of staff in attendance.
An introduction was conducted by City Councilman Ricki Barlow, followed by a description of
the project by each of the three applicants, that included statements pertaining to the applicants
commitment to women and children over the past 12 years and characteristics of the site design.
In general, the public supported the program but did not want this development in their
neighborhood for a number of reasons (see below).
SS
SUP-65429 and SDR-65430 [PRJ-65237]

Public Concerns:
Is this to be permanent housing?
o Applicant Response: Individuals sign a lease with Westcare for a period of 6 to
24 months.
Is there a limit to the number of leases on can sign?
o Applicant Response: No, but it is intended for the person to transition out of the
facility.
Is there an age cap on children?
o Applicant Response: 18 years old by law, but 8 years old is Westcares preference
and 5 years old is typical.
The neighbors are in support of the program but not within their neighborhood.
The neighbors were concerned about potential property devaluation.
The neighbors were concerned about the increase crime (break-ins) in the neighborhood.
The neighbors do not believe the use to be a convalescent care facility.
o Staff read the definition of a Convalescent Care/Nursing Facility.
The neighbors believe this project will destroy their community.
The neighbors put forth the idea of a land swap to relocate the facility.
The neighbors stated that Downtown would be a better location for this facility.
There was discussion pertaining to the number of service calls to the adjacent site.
Is this development going to be Section 8 housing?
o Applicant Response: No.
How many people are going to reside at the facility?
o Applicant Response: There are 86 units with the ability to house one parent plus
their children, so the total number of people can change.
Can spouses visit the site?
o Applicant Response: Yes. They will be required to go through drug testing,
security screening and attend a one day counseling program.
The proposed facility will destroy the Rural Preservation Neighborhood buffer.
o Staff clarified what the buffer was.
Will the site have sufficient security and lighting?
o Applicant Response: There will be a controlled access to the site by 24 hour
security. In addition, people entering the site to visit residences will be required
to submit to drug testing and searches, as well as required to attend a day long
counseling program. Furthermore, there is a curfew in place, so no visitation will
take place after a designated time.
There was concern over people loitering on Fridays and Saturdays adjacent to the current
facility.
SS
SUP-65429 and SDR-65430 [PRJ-65237]

Field Check
06/30/16
The site is vacant and bermed for flood control. There are no curbs or gutters
on the adjacent streets. The existing perimeter walls are in good condition.
An above-ground utility bisects the site.

Site Area
Net Acres
4.69 (overall site area is approximately 5.00 acres)
Surrounding
Property
Subject Property
Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12
Undeveloped
Convalescent Care
Facility/Nursing
Home
Undeveloped
Office, Other Than
Listed
Planned or Special
O (Office)
East
Single Family,
Detached
R (Rural Density
Residential)
West
Social Service
Provider
SC (Service
Commercial)
North
South
DR (Desert Rural
GC (General
Commercial)

C-2 (General
Commercial)
R-PD2 (Residential
Units per Acre)
C-2 (General
Commercial)
Master Plan Areas

A-O (Airport Overlay) District (70 feet)
Rural Preservation Overlay District (Buffer area only - within 330 feet)
Trails
Compliance
N/A
Compliance
Y
Y
Compliance
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
SS
SUP-65429 and SDR-65430 [PRJ-65237]

Pursuant to 19.06 and 19.08, the following standards apply:
Standard
Required/Allowed
Min. Lot Size
20,000 SF
Min. Lot Width
100 Feet
Min. Setbacks
Front (Bradley Rd.)
50 Feet
Side
10 Feet
Corner (Duncan Dr.)
15 Feet
Rear
35 Feet
N/A
Max. Beds per Acre
25
Trash Enclosure
Mech. Equipment
2 Stories/35 Feet
Roof or Trellis
Screened
Provided
204,296 SF
252 Feet
Compliance
Y
Y
50 Feet
10 Feet
25 Feet
35 Feet
8 Feet
26.2
1 Story/14 Feet
(Living Areas)
1 Story/22 Feet
(Multipurpose
Bldgs)
Screened, Gated,
w/ a Roof or
Trellis
Screened
Y
Y
Y
Y
N/A
By condition

Required/Allowed
3:1 proximity slope
50 Feet
Adjacent development matching setback
15 Feet
Trash Enclosure
50 Feet
Provided
110 Feet
110 Feet
801 Feet
Y
Y
Compliance
Y
Y
Y
Required
Provided
Standards
Ratio
Trees
Buffer Trees:
North
35 Trees
26 Trees
South
24 Trees
6 Trees
East
9 Trees
15 Trees
14 Trees
14 Trees
West
Compliance
N
N
Y
Y
SS
SUP-65429 and SDR-65430 [PRJ-65237]


Required
Standards
Ratio
Trees
82 Trees
Parking Area Trees
14 Trees
Min. Zone Width
North
15 Feet
South
10 Feet
East
15 Feet
8 Feet
West
Wall Height
Street Name
Duncan Drive
Bradley Road
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Minor Collector
Minor Collector
Governing Document
Title 13.12
Title 13.12
Provided
Compliance
61 Trees
14 Trees
25 Feet
10 Feet
50 Feet
35 Feet
8-foot wall
facing
residential
behind east
setback area
Y
Y
Y
Y
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
30
30
Compliance
with Street
Section
N
N
SS
SUP-65429 and SDR-65430 [PRJ-65237]

Parking Requirement
Required
Provided
Compliance
Gross Floor
Parking
Parking
Area or
Use
Parking
HandiHandiNumber of
Ratio
Regular
Regular
capped
capped
Units
1 space
per 6 beds
+ one
87 units/
space per
Convalescent 123 beds*
employee
Care/Nursing No employees on largest
21
Home
or medical
shift + 3
professionals
spaces for
medical
professionals
21
36
Y
19
2
33
3
Y
*A condition of approval for SDR-59939 limited the number of beds to 87, which would reduce the
parking requirement from 21 to 15.
Exceptions
Requirement
One 24 box tree per 20 feet in
perimeter landscape buffers
(total of 82 trees)
Request
61 total trees in perimeter

buffers
Denial
SS
SUP-65429
SUP-65429
SUP-65429 and SDR-65430
SUP-65429 and SDR-65430
SUP-65429 and SDR-65430
SUP-65429 and SDR-65430
SUP-65429 and SDR-65430

! #

SUP-65429 and SDR-65430

$$%

SUP-65429 and SDR-65430

! #

SUP-65429 and SDR-65430

%

SUP-65429 and SDR-65430

%

SUP-65429 and SDR-65430

SUP-65429 and SDR-65430

SUP-65429 and SDR-65430

&
SUP-65429 and SDR-65430

&
SUP-65429 and SDR-65430

SUP-65429 [PRJ-65237] SPECIAL USE PERMIT RELATED TO SDR-65430 - APPLICANT/OWNER:

WESTCARE FOUNDATION, INC.
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF DUNCAN DRIVE AND BRADLEY ROAD
06/30/16

06/30/16

06/30/16

06/30/16
SUP-65429 and SDR-65430
A 7 A
b 7b b
b A 7 7 A
A
7 7
A 7 7
7A A A
b 7 7 A
A 7 7A
7b
7
A 7 7
b 7 A A
77
7 77
b 7 7
7 7 7
7 7
7A A b 77 7 77 b A 7 7
A 7 7
b 7b b 7 7 7 b 77
7 7
7b 7b 7777 777 777 A
777 7 7 7A 7 7 b A b
77
b A 7 A b 7 7 7 7 7 7
77 7 7A 77 7 7
7 77 7
777777 7

A 7
7
b 7 7A 7 A
A 7 7 A
7 b 7b
7 7 A b 7
7
A 7 A 7 A A 7
b 7
A 7
7

b 7
77 7777 7777
77
7 7777777777 77

77777777777 777
7 777 777777
7 7777 77777A 77
7b 777 7 77 b 7 7
77b 7b 7 7 7
A 777 777b 77A 77
7 7 7 777
777
b 7A A
7 7 7 7 7b b 7 7 A 7b A 7
SUP-65429 and SDR-65430
7 77
b 77
7 77 7
77
7 77777 77 777777
777777 b 7 77A 7 77
7777777b 777
7 A 777 77777777
77 7 7777777777
7 77
7 7b 77A 77777777777
777 77 77 777777
7 A 7b 7b 7 777777b 7 7 7
777 7
7 777A 7 77 777 7b 7b D77 77
7A 7

77
A
SUP-65429 and SDR-65430
77
A 7 A
b 7b b
b A 7 7 A
A
7 7
A 7 7
7A A A
b 77A
A 7 7A
7b
7
A 7 7
b 7 A A
7 77
b 77
7 7 7
7 7
7A A b 77 7 77 7 7 A
7 A 7 7
b 7b b 7 7 7 b 77
7 7
7b 7b 7777 777 777A 7
777 7 7 7 7 7A 7 7
7 77 A 7b A b 7b A
A b 7 77 77777
77 7 77 7 7A 777
777 7 7 777b 7
b 77 77 7
777777 7

b 7 7A7 A
A 7 7A
7b7b
7 7 A b 7
7
A7 A7 A A7
b 7
A7
7

7 7
777
A 7A 777777 777 77
777 777 77777
77777 7777
7
7 7 7777777777
7 777 7777 7 77
777 7 777777 7
7 7
b 7A 7777777 7 77 77
7 7777 7A 77 77777
777777 H77 7
7 7777 7
777 777777 77
7 777
7 7 7 7 7b b 7 7 A 7b A 7
b 7A A
SUP-65429 and SDR-65430
7 77
b 77
7 77 7
7
7 A 777 777b 77A 77 7 7

77777
7 77777 77 777777
777777 b 7 77A 7 77
7777777b 777
7 A 7 7777 7 777777
7 777777 777
777
7 A 777 77777777
77 7 7777777777
7 77
7 7b 77A 77777777777
7 7
7 7777 77b 7 77777
77 77 77777
77 7 7777 77777
7777
7 A 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7A
7A 7 7 77b 7 7 77
77777 7 777 7777 7A 7
7H7 777777 7 7
77 7777777
7777 7777777
777777 77 77
7
7 77777777 7 777 7
77 77777777A 7
77777
7 A 77777 77777
77 7777777777
777 7
SUP-65429 and SDR-65430
7 77
b 77
7 77 7
7
7 A 7b 7b 7 777777b 7 7 7
777 77
7
7 7777777 777777
777 7 77 7 7A 77
7777b 777 7 7 7777
7 77 7A
7 b 77 77777
7 77 7 777777 7
7777777777777
777777 77 7 77
7 777777777
7 77 777777777
777A
7 777 7777777
7 77 7 777
7b 777 777777777
77 77A 777777
77777777 7
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7A
777 H777 777
7 7 7 777b 7 77 H7777
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7 7 7777 77 H77
77 H777777777777
H7777 77 777
7 7777777 777 7 7777
7
7 77 77 7 777777
A 7777 77 7777
77 7777777777
777 777777
SUP-65429 and SDR-65430
7 77
b 7 7
7 77 7
7
7 77 7A 77777 7
77 7 77 7 777 77777
777 7 77 77777
7 7 7 7 7A 7 7 7 7b 7 7 7 77
77777777777b 7
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 77
77777 777b 7 7A
777 7777 77777
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7 777777777 777
A 7b 77 777 7A 7 7
7 7 777 77 77 7
7 77777 7 7 7A 7 A 77
7A 7 7 77 7 7 7 77 77
777 77 7 =7777777
77 7 7 7
7 7 7 77 7 7 7
77 777777777
777777 777
77b 77 7 7 7 7 777
77 7 7777A 77b
7 7 7 7b 7 7 7 7 7 A 7 7 7
7777
7 77 7A 7 77 77 7 7b 7b =77 77
7A 7

77
A
SUP-65429 and SDR-65430

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
SDR-65430 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO SUP-65429 - PUBLIC
HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: WESTCARE FOUNDATION, INC. - For possible action
on a request for a Site Development Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED SINGLE-STORY, 87UNIT, 57,999 SQUARE-FOOT CONVALESCENT CARE FACILITY/NURSING HOME on
approximately 5.00 acres at the southwest corner of Duncan Drive and Bradley Road (APNs
138-12-110-056 and a portion of 138-12-210-036), R-E (Residence Estates) Zone and C-2
(General Commercial) Zone, Ward 5 (Barlow) [PRJ-65237]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
RECOMMENDATION:

paper use, backup
SDR-65430
SDR-65430
SDR 65430
Westcare Foundation, Inc.
SWC Duncan Drive & Bradley Road

Proposed 57.999 thousand square foot nursing home.
Proposed Use
AM Peak Hour
7.58
NURSING HOME [1000 SF]
PM Peak Hour
57.999
0.55
0.74
440
32
43

Bradley Road
868
69
Rancho Drive
25,080
2,006

Bradley Road
Rancho Drive

13,040
51,800
This project will add approximately 440 trips per day on Duncan Dr., Bradley Rd. and Rancho Dr. Bradley is currently at
about 7 percent of capacity and Rancho is at about 48 percent of capacity. After this project, Bradley is expected to be at
about 10 percent of capacity and Rancho to be at about 49 percent of capacity. Counts are not available for Duncan in this
vicinity, but it is believed to be under capacity.
Based on Peak Hour use, this development will add into the area roughly 43 additional cars, or about three every four
minutes.

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
SUP-65431 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/ OWNER:
CLAIRISSA IRENE RICCIO - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR A
PROPOSED SHORT-TERM RESIDENTIAL RENTAL USE WITH A WAIVER TO ALLOW
ZERO-FOOT DISTANCE SEPARATION FROM A SIMILAR USE WHERE 660 FEET IS
REQUIRED at 427 South 11th Street, Unit #1 (APN 139-34-811-033), R-4 (High Density
Residential) Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-65236]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Location, Aerial and Special Maps - SUP-65431, SUP-65432, SUP-65433, SUP-65434 and
SUP-65436 [PRJ-65236]
2. Conditions and Staff Report - SUP-65431, SUP-65432, SUP-65433, SUP-65434 and SUP65436 [PRJ-65236]
3. Supporting Documentation - SUP-65431, SUP-65432, SUP-65433, SUP-65434 and SUP65436 [PRJ-65236]
4. Photo(s) - SUP-65431, SUP-65432, SUP-65433, SUP-65434 and SUP-65436 [PRJ-65236]
5. Justification Letter - SUP-65431, SUP-65432, SUP-65433, SUP-65434 and SUP-65436 [PRJ65236]
6. Support Letters - SUP-65431, SUP-65432, SUP-65433, SUP-65434 and SUP-65436 [PRJ65236]
SUP-65431, SUP-65432, SUP-65433, SUP-65434, SUP-65435 and SUP-65436 [PRJ-65236]

DEPARTMENT:
PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/ OWNER: CLAIRISSA IRENE RICCIO
CASE
NUMBER
SUP-65431
SUP-65432
SUP-65433
SUP-65434
SUP-65435
SUP-65436
RECOMMENDATION
REQUIRED FOR
APPROVAL

conditions:
conditions:
Staff recommends
conditions:
Staff recommends
conditions:
Staff recommends
conditions:
Staff recommends
conditions:

** NOTIFICATION **
41
NOTICES MAILED
141 SUP-65431 and SUP-65432

141 SUP-65433 and SUP-65434
141 SUP-65435 and SUP-65436
APPROVALS
7 SUP-65431 and SUP-65432

7 SUP-65433 and SUP-65434
7 SUP-65435 and SUP-65436
PROTESTS
0 SUP-65431 and SUP-65432

0 SUP-65433 and SUP-65434
0 SUP-65435 and SUP-65436
RG

Conditions Page One
** CONDITIONS **
Planning
1.
Conformance to all Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.12 for a Short-Term
Residential Rental use.
2.
3.
from another Short-Term Residential Rental use.
4.
Safety.
5.
6.
Planning
1.
2.
RG

Conditions Page Two
3.
4.
Safety.
5.
6.
Planning
1.
2.
3.
4.
Safety.
5.
6.
RG

Planning
1.
2.
3.
4.
Safety.
5.
6.
Planning
1.
2.
RG

3.
4.
Safety.
5.
6.
Planning
1.
2.
3.
4.
necessary building permits shall be obtained and final inspections shall be completed in
Safety.
5.
6.
RG

** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This is a request for six Special Use Permit applications for a proposed Short-Term Residential
Rental use, with waivers of the distance separation from similar use at 427 South 11 th Street.
The subject property contains an eight-unit Multi-Family Residential building.
ISSUES
Per Title 19.12, a Short-Term Residential Rental use is a Conditional use, with a Conditional
Use Regulation for a distance separation of 660 feet between similar uses. However, a
business license for a Short-Term Residential Rental use was issued at this location for Unit
#6 on 07/18/16.
The applicant is requesting for six Special Use Permit applications to allow six Multi-Family
Residential units with waivers to allow a zero-foot distance separation from a similar use.
Staff does not support this request, as the resulting use of the property would mimic a
Commercial Hotel/Motel use, and would not be compatible with the surrounding residential
uses.
ANALYSIS
The subject property is an existing eight-unit multi-family residential development. The subject
property is currently zoned R-4 (High Density Residential). The site is located in the Live/Work
Overlay District. A business license (G64-03698) for a Short-Term Residential Rental was
issued for Unit #6 on 07/18/16. Pursuant to Title 19.12, a Short-Term Residential Rental use is a
Conditional use and the use may not be closer than 660 feet from similar use. The applicant is
requesting six Special Use Permit applications to add six more Short-Term Residential Rental
units (Units #1, #2, #4, #5, #7 and #8) with waivers to allow a zero-foot distance separation from
a similar use. The site has eight parking spaces located on the east side of the property and the
proposed use does not require additional parking required beyond that which is required for the
principal use on the site. The parking lot can be accessed through an alley way between Lewis
and Clark Avenues.
The Short-Term Residential Rental use is defined as The commercial use, or the making
available for commercial use, of a residential dwelling unit for dwelling, lodging or sleeping
purposes, wherein any individual guest rents or occupies the unit for a period of less than 31
consecutive calendar days. This use does not include a Community Residence, Facility for
Transitional Living for Released Offenders, or any other facility with dwelling units that is
specifically defined in Chapter 19.18.
RG

The proposed use meets the definition the applicant is proposing the use of the existing dwelling
for commercial use for dwelling, lodging or sleeping purposes. The guest will rent the unit for
less than 31 consecutive calendar days.
1. The operator must obtain a business license to operate the use.
If these Special Use Permits are approved, the applicant will be required to obtain a
business license.
2. The use must comply on an ongoing basis with all governmental licensing and regulatory
requirements, including the payment of applicable room taxes and licensing fees.
If business licenses are issued for the Short-Term Residential Rental, it will be subject to
license renewal and annual compliance reviews to ensure that all regulatory
requirements are being met.
3. The use must comply with the Citys noise regulations as they apply to residential uses.
If this use violates the Citys noise regulations, neighbors or members of the public can
file a complaint to the Code Enforcement Division, which would result in enforcement
action.
4. Vehicle parking associated with the use shall comply with applicable parking regulations,
and vehicles of guests and invitees shall not obstruct traffic or access to other properties
in the area.
If the parking regulations are violated or any traffic obstruction to other properties, the
public can either call the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department or the Business
License Division for non-compliance of business license requirements.
5. In addition to and independent of any enforcement authority or remedy described in this
Title, the failure to comply with a Minimum Special Use Permit Requirement or other
condition of approval associated with this use may be enforced as in the case of a
violation of Title 6 by means of a civil proceeding pursuant to LVMC 6.02.400 to
6.02.460, inclusive.
These applications if approved will be subject to annual review for compliance of the
Special Use Permits by the Department of Planning.
RG

6. The use may not be located closer than 660 feet to any other Short-Term Residential
Rental use (measured from property line to property line).
The subject property has a business license for a Short-Term Residential Rental. These
Special Use Permit applications are accompanied with the request for a waiver of the
distance separation.
7. The maximum occupancy of the residential dwelling unit shall not exceed the limits
provided for in LVMC 6.75.090.
Business License will conduct compliance inspections once the business licenses are
approved for compliance review.
The proposed Short-Term Residential Rental use will not be compatible within the surrounding
uses due to the existing similar use on the subject property. The minimum special use permit
requirements specify that the distance to similar uses shall be at 660 feet. Approval of all six
Special Use Permit applications would result in a land use similar to a Commercial Hotel/Motel
use; therefore, staff recommends denial, if this application is approved, it is subject to conditions.
FINDINGS (SUP-65431, SUP-65432, SUP-65433, SUP-65434, SUP-65435 and SUP-65436)

1.
The proposed land use cannot be conducted in a manner that is harmonious and
compatible with the existing surrounding land uses due to the waiver request of zero-foot
distance separation from similar use already on site. Approval of all six Special Use
Permit applications would result in a land use similar to a Commercial Hotel/Motel use.
2.
The subject site is not physically suitable for the type and intensity of land use proposed
due to the similar uses on site and the increase in the number of Short-Term Residential
Rental uses on the property.
3.
RG

The is adjacent to 11th Street, an 80-foot Major Collector pursuant to the Master Plan of
Streets and Highways. The existing parking for this property is located on the east side of
the building through an alley way between Lewis and Clark.
4.
General Plan.
conditions of approval and business license approval and compliance.
5.
The proposed use does not meet all of the applicable conditions of Title 19.12. The use
may not be closer than 660 feet from any other Short-Term Residential Rental use. The
applicant is requesting a waiver to allow a zero-foot distance separation.
The Board of Zoning Adjustment approved a requested for a Variance (V0047-71) to allow eight parking spaces where 12 are required on property
12/16/71
located on the east side of 11th Street, between Lewis Avenue and Clark
Avenue.
A Code Enforcement case (#166646) was processed on the property located at
05/09/16
427 South 11th Street for possible air bed and breakfast. The case was
A Conditional Use Verification (CUV-64734) was processed for a Short05/19/16
Term Residential Rental at 427 South 11th Street, Unit #6.
02/16/16
A building permit (#2372) was issued for a 4-unit Apartment at 427 South
01/11/72
11th Street. The permit was finalized on 06/02/72.
A building permit (#2373) was issued for a 4-unit Apartment at 427 South
01/13/72
11th Street. The permit was finalized on 06/02/72.
A business license (G64-3701) was issued for an Apartment House at 427
06/26/16
South 11th Street. The license is active.
A business license (G64-03698) was issued for a Short-Term Residential
07/18/16
Rental at 427 South 11th Street, Unit #6. The license is active.
RG

application submittal process for a Special Use Permit for a proposed ShortTerm Residential Rental. A Short-Term Residential Rental business license
was applied for by the applicant in one of the units. Any additional licenses
for the use will maintain a 660-foot distance separation. Since the first
06/16/16
business license is located on the same property. Each unit will require
Special Use Permits and request for waivers of the required distance
separation. The applicant was informed that there will be six applications will
be submitted since six units will be designated for Short-Term Residential
Use.
A neighborhood meeting was not required.
Field Check
06/30/16
A field check by staff was conducted and noticed the subject property is well
maintained.

Site Area
Net Acres
0.16
Surrounding
Property
Subject Property
North
South
East
West
Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12
Multi-Family
Residential
Single Family,
Detached
Multi-Family
Residential
Multi-Family
Residential
Single Family,
Detached
Planned or Special
MXU (Mixed Use)
MXU (Mixed Use)
MXU (Mixed Use)
MXU (Mixed Use)
MXU (Mixed Use)

R-4 (High Density
Residential)
R-4 (High Density
Residential)
R-4 (High Density
Residential)
R-4 (High Density
Residential)
R-4 (High Density
Residential)
RG

Master Plan Areas

Trails
Compliance
N/A
Compliance
N/A
Compliance
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Street Name
11th Street
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Governing Document
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Compliance
with Street
Section
Major Collector
Planned Streets and

Highways Map
80
RG
SUP-65431
SUP-65431
SUP-65431, SUP-65432, SUP-65433, SUP-65434, SUP-65435 and SUP-65436

SUP-65435 AND SUP-65436 - APPLICANT/ OWNER: CLAIRISSA IRENE RICCIO
427 SOUTH 11TH STREET, UNIT #1
06/30/16

SUP-65435 AND SUP-65436 - APPLICANT/ OWNER: CLAIRISSA IRENE RICCIO
427 SOUTH 11TH STREET, UNIT #1
06/30/16
SUP-65431, SUP-65432, SUP-65433, SUP-65434,

SUP-65435 and SUP-65436

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
RECOMMENDATION:

paper use, backup
SUP-65432
SUP-65432

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
RECOMMENDATION:

paper use, backup
SUP-65433
SUP-65433

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
RECOMMENDATION:

paper use, backup
SUP-65434
SUP-65434

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
RECOMMENDATION:

paper use, backup
SUP-65435
SUP-65435

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
RECOMMENDATION:

paper use, backup
SUP-65436
SUP-65436

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
SUP-65450 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: REAL
RACQUET ACADEMY - OWNER: MARY BARTSAS 13, LLC - For possible action on a
request for a Special Use Permit FOR A COUNTRY CLUB, PRIVATE at the southeast corner
of Oakey Boulevard and Buffalo Drive (APN 163-03-301-012), R-E (Residence Estates) Zone,
Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-65250]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
RECOMMENDATION:
6. Protest/Support Postcards and Phone Log - SUP-65450 and SDR-65451 [PRJ-65250]
SUP-65450 and SDR-65451 [PRJ-65250]

DEPARTMENT:
PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: REAL RACQUET ACADEMY - OWNER: MARY
BARTSAS 13, LLC
CASE
NUMBER
SUP-65450
SDR-65451
RECOMMENDATION
REQUIRED FOR
APPROVAL
SUP-65450
** NOTIFICATION **
NOTICES MAILED
170
APPROVALS
PROTESTS
29
SS
SUP-65450 and SDR-65451 [PRJ-65250]

Conditions Page One
** CONDITIONS **
Planning
1.
2.
3.
Safety.
4.
5.
Planning
1.
2.
3.
All development shall be in conformance with the site plan and landscape plan date
stamped 07/26/16 and building elevations, date stamped 06/27/16, except as amended by
conditions herein.
SS
SUP-65450 and SDR-65451 [PRJ-65250]

Conditions Page Two
4.
Handicap-accessible parking spaces shall be striped and dimensioned in conformance with

Title 19 requirements.
5.
All utility boxes and above-ground utility installations in excess of 27 cubic feet in size to
be placed outside of the public right-of-way shall be screened with landscaping on two
sides pursuant to Title 19.08.040, with one side being available for access by utility
companies.
6.
Safety.
7.
8.

of any traffic control device. The technical landscape plan shall indicate four five-gallon
shrubs per tree provided in perimeter landscape buffers.
9.
10.
Public Works
11.
Remove all substandard public street improvements and unused driveway cuts adjacent to
this site and replace with new improvements meeting current City Standards concurrent
with development of this site.
12.
SS
SUP-65450 and SDR-65451 [PRJ-65250]

** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The site consists of 2.03 acres of undeveloped land at the southeast corner of Oakey Boulevard
and Buffalo Drive. The applicant is requesting to construct a 4,200 square-foot single-story
clubhouse with covered patio, eight outdoor padel courts and a courtyard in this space, all for use
as a private country club. The facility would be for private membership of the neighborhood
residents only.
ISSUES
A Country Club, Private use is permitted in the R-E (Residence Estates) zoning district with
approval of a Special Use Permit.
Above-ground utility installations along Buffalo Drive must be screened on two sides by
landscaping in accordance with Title 19.08.040 requirements. A condition of approval
addresses this issue.
ANALYSIS
Development within this site is subject to the requirements of Title 19.06 for R-E (Residence
Estates) zoned properties. Pursuant to Title 19.12 this will be classified as a Country Club,
Private. A Site Development Plan Review is required for development of the site, and a Special
Use Permit is required for this use in the R-E (Residence Estates) zoning district. The site is
adjacent to two Rural Preservation Neighborhoods, but the proposed development is not directly
affected by this designation.
The Country Club, Private use is defined as a facility that is made available for use on a
membership basis for recreational or athletic purposes, where membership is limited and the use
of the facility is primarily restricted to members and their guests. This use includes accessory
uses such as (1) a clubhouse; (2) retail and restaurant facilities which do not have separate
signage or advertising. The proposed use meets the definition, as the applicant states in its letter
of justification that this would be a private membership club for neighborhood residents. The
development would include a 4,200 square-foot clubhouse and eight padel tennis courts situated
around a hardscaped courtyard. Padel tennis courts are approximately one-third of the size of
regulation tennis courts.
Pursuant to Title 19.06.060, nonresidential development in the R-E District shall adhere to
commercial development standards for landscaping. Therefore, 15 feet of onsite landscape
buffering is required along Oakey Boulevard and Buffalo Drive and eight feet is required on all
SS
SUP-65450 and SDR-65451 [PRJ-65250]

interior sides. Adequate buffer zones are provided along the two public rights-of-way. As all
parcels in the vicinity of this site are zoned R-E, a 23-foot wide landscape buffer with two rows
of staggered mesquite trees is provided along the east property line next to existing single-family
homes for screening purposes, while a 10-foot buffer is provided along the south property line
adjacent to an undeveloped two-acre parcel. An existing six-foot block wall will remain along
the east property line, and a new eight-foot split face block wall is proposed along the south
property line in conformance with Title 19 perimeter screening requirements. In addition, the
applicant is proposing a combination CMU/wrought iron fence behind the front and corner side
yards for protection of the clubhouse and padel courts. There are two existing above ground
utility appurtenances in the sidewalk along Buffalo Drive. These are proposed to be relocated in
the adjacent landscape buffer so as not to impede pedestrian access. A condition of approval
requires these utilities to be screened on at least two sides by landscaping.
There are no Minimum Special Use Permit Requirements for this use. Conditions may be
imposed on this use by the Planning Commission or City Council to ensure compatibility with
the surrounding land uses.
Access is planned from both Buffalo Drive (right in, right-out) and Oakey Boulevard.
Circulation around the site is logical. The parking lot has been reconfigured to eliminate backing
conflicts with the access points.
The proposed clubhouse adheres to all residential adjacency requirements from R-E properties
on all sides. In addition, the proposed trash enclosure will be located more than 50 feet from the
property to the south. Any trash enclosure shall be gated, screened and contain a roof or trellis
in conformance to Title 19.
The proposed private country club is appropriately sized for this parcel, and the padel courts and
clubhouse are adequately screened through walls and landscaping from the adjacent R-E zoned
residential properties. All Title 19 requirements are being met, with no waivers or variances
required. For these reasons, staff recommends approval of the Site Development Plan Review
with conditions. If denied, the property would remain undeveloped.
1.
SS
SUP-65450 and SDR-65451 [PRJ-65250]

The proposed Country Club, Private use is appropriately sized for a residential
neighborhood, and can be adequately screened from adjacent properties through perimeter
fencing and landscaping.
2.
The site is currently undeveloped; it can accommodate the proposed clubhouse size,
number of padel tennis courts, and all Title 19 parking and landscaping requirements.
3.
Oakey Boulevard (classified as an 80-foot Major Collector) and Buffalo Drive (classified
as a 100-foot Primary Arterial) provide access to the site and have adequate capacity to
meet the needs of the proposed Country Club, Private use.
4.
General Plan.
The proposed use will be subject to license requirements and inspections, thereby
safeguarding the public health, safety and general welfare.
5.
There are no minimum use requirements for a Country Club, Private use in Title 19.12.
1.

The proposed private country club is appropriately sized for this parcel, and the padel
courts and clubhouse are adequately screened through walls and landscaping from the
adjacent R-E zoned residential properties.
2.
SS
SUP-65450 and SDR-65451 [PRJ-65250]

All Title 19 requirements are being met; no waivers or variances are required.
3.

Access to the property is provided by two driveways. The Buffalo Drive access is right-in,
right-out only, while the Oakey Boulevard access will allow for left turns. Excess parking
spaces that were causing backing conflicts have been removed, thereby eliminating
negative impacts to traffic in the area.
4.
The provided elevations indicate that stucco exteriors with metallic and tile accents will be
featured on the clubhouse. These materials are appropriate for this type of building and
compatible with this area.
5.

The proposed clubhouse will be built to a scale that is compatible with the adjacent singlefamily dwellings. Design characteristics are carried around all sides, and the tallest parts
of the building are designed to face rights-of-way.
6.
general welfare.
Development of the site will be subject to permit review and inspection, thereby protecting
the public health, safety and general welfare.
SS
SUP-65450 and SDR-65451 [PRJ-65250]

The City Council approved a Petition to Annex (A-0009-85) approximately
1,400 acres generally located south of Charleston Boulevard between Torrey
03/19/86
Pines Drive and Fort Apache Road, including the subject site. The
Annexation became effective 03/28/86.
The City Council approved a request to amend a portion of the Southwest
Sector Plan of the General Plan (GPA-0027-98) from R (Rural Density
Residential) to DR (Desert Rural Density Residential) on properties bounded
11/23/98
by the Holmby Avenue Drainage Alignment, Via Olivero Avenue, Rainbow
Boulevard and Durango Drive. The Planning Commission and staff
The City Council approved a Special Use Permit (SUP-45488) for a proposed
Church/House of Worship at the northeast corner of Buffalo Drive and El
Parque Avenue. The Planning Commission and staff recommended approval.
The approval expired 10/17/14.
10/17/12
for a proposed 4,576 square-foot Church/House of Worship on 2.09 acres at
the northeast corner of Buffalo Drive and El Parque Avenue. The Planning
Commission and staff recommended approval. The approval expired
10/17/14.

12/09/03

There are no relevant building permits or business licenses for this site.
Submittal requirements for a Special Use Permit and Site Development Plan
Review were discussed with the applicants representatives. Staff informed
the representatives that the sidewalk along Buffalo Drive would need to avoid
06/20/16
the existing above ground utilities; a pedestrian easement would be needed for
any sidewalk that is located outside of the public right-of-way. In addition, an
existing streetlight will need to be relocated to allow for the Buffalo Drive
access.
SS
SUP-65450 and SDR-65451 [PRJ-65250]

A neighborhood meeting is not required for these requests. However, the applicants have stated
that they have met several times with the surrounding neighbors to discuss feasibility of the
project and obtain input on the design of the development.
Field Check
06/30/16
The site is undeveloped with patches of weeds and shrubs throughout. There
are currently several political and off-premise signs on the property. The
intersection of Oakey Boulevard and Buffalo Drive is signalized and fully
improved with attached sidewalks. Two above-ground utility appurtenances
are located in the sidewalk along Buffalo Drive.

Site Area
Net Acres
2.03
Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12
Subject Property
Undeveloped
North
Undeveloped
South
Undeveloped
East
West
Single Family,
Detached
Single Family,
Detached
Planned or Special
DR (Desert Rural
DR (Desert Rural
DR (Desert Rural
DR (Desert Rural
DR (Desert Rural

Master Plan Areas

Trails (Pedestrian Path Oakey Blvd.)
Compliance
N/A
Compliance
N/A
Compliance
Y
N/A
N/A
N/A
SS
SUP-65450 and SDR-65451 [PRJ-65250]

Standard
Required/Allowed
Min. Lot Size
20,000 SF
Min. Lot Width
100 feet
Min. Setbacks
Front (Oakey Blvd)
50 feet
Side
10 feet
Corner (Buffalo Dr)
15 feet
Rear
35 feet
Max. Lot Coverage (with courts)
N/A
2 stories/35 feet
Trash Enclosure
Roof or Trellis
Mech. Equipment
Screened
Provided
88,427 SF
290 feet
Compliance
Y
Y
69 feet
117 feet
73 feet
149 feet
37 %
1 story/21 feet
Y
Y
Y
Y
N/A
Y
Screened, gated
By condition
Parapet screened

Required/Allowed
3:1 proximity slope
63 Feet
Adjacent development matching setback
10 Feet/35 Feet
Trash Enclosure
50 Feet
Provided
145 Feet
117 Feet
62 Feet

Required
Standards
Ratio
Trees
Buffer Trees:
North
10 Trees
South
14 Trees
East
14 Trees
11 Trees
West
49 Trees
Parking Area Trees
17 Trees
Compliance
Y
Y
Y
Provided
Compliance
10 Trees
27 Trees
25 Trees
11 Trees
73 Trees
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
17 Trees
SS
SUP-65450 and SDR-65451 [PRJ-65250]

Staff Report Page Eitgt

Required
Standards
Ratio
Min. Zone Width
North
15 Feet
South
8 Feet
East
8 Feet
15 Feet
West
Wall Height
Street Name
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Oakey Boulevard
Major Collector
Buffalo Drive
Primary Arterial
Provided
Compliance
15 Feet
10 Feet
23 Feet
15 Feet
Existing 6
CMU wall
adjacent to
east PL
Proposed 8
CMU wall
adjacent to
south PL
Y
Y
Y
Y
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Compliance
with Street
Section
80
100
Trees
Governing Document
and Highways Map
and Highways Map
Parking Requirement
Required
Provided
Compliance
Gross Floor
Parking
Parking
Area or
Use
Parking
Number of
HandiHandiRatio
Regular
Regular
Units
capped
capped
1 space
Country Club,
4,200 SF
per 200
21
Private
SF GFA
21
52
Y
20
1
49
3
Y
SS
SUP-65450
SUP-65450
SUP-65450 and SDR-65451 - REVISED
SUP-65450 and SDR-65451
SUP-65450 and SDR-65451
7 7 7 A7 7 Ab 7 7 7 7 *7 7 7 7 b b b A7 7 A7 7 7 7 7
SUP-65450 and SDR-65451
SUP-65450 [PRJ-65250] SPECIAL USE PERMIT RELATED TO SDR-65451 - APPLICANT: REAL RACQUET
ACADEMY - OWNER: MARY BARTSAS 13, LLC
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF OAKEY BOULEVARD AND BUFFALO DRIVE
06/30/16
06/30/16
06/30/16
06/30/16
77777777777777777777777777777
777777777
777b7b7
777
77777777b7'777
7777777777777777777
A7777 7777777777777
77b777777777777777777777
A77
A77777#77
77
777b
77777777777777777
77777777777#77
7
777A7777777777
7 7 7 '7 7 '7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7777777777777777777
77777777
7 7 7 '7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
77777777777777777
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7777777777777777
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 '7 7 7 7 7 7 AA7 7
7777777777777b7777
77'7
7 77 7 7 7 '7 7 7 7 77 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7777777777777'77777777
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 '7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
777777'
7 17
7 7
7 7
7 7
7 7
7 77
7 7
7 7
7 77
77b
7 7
7 7
7 77
7777b
7 7
7 77
7 77
77
77
7717
777 7
7
777777'7
777
7
77777
77
77717777777771
77A7177777777
777777A771Ab777777

b77777777
SUP-65450 and SDR-65451

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
HEARING - APPLICANT: REAL RACQUET ACADEMY - OWNER: MARY BARTSAS 13,
LLC - For possible action on a request for a Site Development Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED
4,200 SQUARE-FOOT CLUB HOUSE AND EIGHT SPORT COURTS ASSOCIATED WITH
A COUNTRY CLUB, PRIVATE on 2.03 acres at the southeast corner of Oakey Boulevard and
Buffalo Drive (APN 163-03-301-012), R-E (Residence Estates) Zone, Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ65250]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
RECOMMENDATION:

paper use, backup
SDR-65451
SDR-65451
SDR 65451
Real Racquet Academy
SEC Oakey Boulevard & Buffalo Drive

Proposed 8 court tennis club.
Proposed Use
AM Peak Hour
38.70
RACQUET/TENNIS CLUB [COURTS]
PM Peak Hour
1.31
3.35
310
10
27

Oakey Boulevard
6,873
550
Buffalo Drive
32,325
2,586

Oakey Boulevard
Buffalo Drive

25,400
34,500
This project will add approximately 310 trips per day on Oakey Blvd. and Buffalo Dr. Oakey is currently at about 27 percent
of capacity and Buffalo is at about 94 percent of capacity. After this project, Oakey is expected to be at about 28 percent of
capacity and Buffalo to be at about 95 percent of capacity.
Based on Peak Hour use, this development will add into the area roughly 27 additional cars, or about one every two
minutes.

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
SUP-65718 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: BIG
BLOCK PARTNERS, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Major Amendment to Special
Use Permit (SUP-61048) FOR A MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT WITH WAIVERS TO
ALLOW RESIDENTIAL UNITS ON THE GROUND FLOOR AND A SURFACE PARKING
LOT AT THE FRONT OF THE DEVELOPMENT at the northeast corner of Charleston
Boulevard and 3rd Street (APNs 139-34-410-093 through 096), C-2 (General Commercial)
Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-65227]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
RECOMMENDATION:
6. Protest/Support Postcards - SUP-65718 and SDR-65451 [PRJ-65250]
SUP-65718 and SDR-65369 [PRJ-65227]

DEPARTMENT:
PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: BIG BLOCK PARTNERS, LLC
CASE
NUMBER
SUP-65718
SDR-65369
RECOMMENDATION
conditions:
conditions:
REQUIRED FOR
APPROVAL
SUP-65718
** NOTIFICATION **
NOTICES MAILED
371
APPROVALS
PROTESTS
34
JB
SUP-65718 and SDR-65369 [PRJ-65227]

Conditions Page One
** CONDITIONS **
Planning
1.
Conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Special Use Permit (SUP-61048) shall be
required, except as amended herein.
2.
3.
A Waiver is hereby approved, to allow residential units on the ground floor of the
development.
4.
A Waiver is hereby approved, to allow the surface parking lot at the front of the
development.
5.
6.
Planning
1.
Conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Special Use Permit (SUP-65718) shall be
required, if approved.
2.
The previously approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-61050) shall be expunged.
3.
JB
SUP-65718 and SDR-65369 [PRJ-65227]

Conditions Page Two
4.
All development shall be in conformance with the site plan, landscape plan, building
elevations and floor plans, date stamped 07/13/16, except as amended by conditions herein.
5.
A Waiver from the Downtown Centennial Plan Architectural Design Standards is hereby
approved, to allow no canopies or awnings at the pedestrian level.
6.
All service and loading areas shall be positioned so service vehicles will not disrupt traffic
flow to or from the site. Verify with Republic Services the route to be taken for trash
pickup.
7.
Safety.
8.
9.
action shall be completed and recorded prior to the issuance of any building permits for the
main structure.
10.
11.
12.

a. Provide 36-inch box (Southern Live Oak, Shoestring Acacia, African Sumac, Ash or
Pistache or other drought tolerant shade trees as approved by staff as a primary
landscape element) or other acceptable shade trees at 15-20-foot intervals in the
amenity zones along Charleston Boulevard and 3rd Street adjacent to this site in
conformance with the Downtown Centennial Plan.
JB
SUP-65718 and SDR-65369 [PRJ-65227]

b. Provide benches, trash receptacles, tree grates and associated amenities as required
by the Downtown Centennial Plan.
13.
Public Works
14.
Dedicate a 10-foot radius on the southeast corner of 3rd Street and Coolidge Avenue prior
to the issuance of any permits.
15.
this site and replace with new improvements meeting Downtown Centennial Plan
Standards concurrent with development of this site, except as amended by conditions
herein and as otherwise allowed by the City Engineer.
16.
If the proposed entry gates are to be electrically opened and closed, the gates may be placed
immediately behind the street right-of-way line (i.e., on the private property side of where
the sidewalk is located). If the entry gate is to be manually opened and closed, the gates
shall be set back a sufficient distance (a minimum of 18 feet) to allow a vehicle to pull
completely out of the public street right-of-way before parking to manually operate the
gate; alternatively the gates shall remain open during regular business hours. The
installation of either swing gates or rolling gates are acceptable as long as no part of the
gates, either in the opened or closed position, intrude into the public right of way.
17.
Contact the City Engineers Office at 702-229-6272 to coordinate the development of this
project with the Downtown Pedestrian and Bicycle improvements 3rd Street project,
the Downtown Pedestrian and Bicycle improvements Coolidge Avenue project and
any other public improvement projects adjacent to this site. Comply with the
18.
discuss fire requirements for the proposed use of this facility.
19.
All private improvements and landscaping installed with this project shall be situated and
JB
SUP-65718 and SDR-65369 [PRJ-65227]

20.
Submit an Encroachment Agreement for landscaping and private improvements in the 3rd
Street and Coolidge Avenue public rights-of-way, if any, prior to this issuance of permits
for these improvements. The applicant must carry an insurance policy for the term of the
improvements in the public right of way shall be the responsibility of the adjacent property
owner(s) and shall be transferred with the sale of the property for the entire term of the
21.
establishing finished floor elevations and drainage paths for this site prior to submittal of
construction plans, the issuance of any building or grading permits, or the submittal of a
map for this site, whichever may occur first. Provide and improve all drainage ways as
recommended.
JB
SUP-65718 and SDR-65369 [PRJ-65227]

** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is requesting to construct a three-building, 50.5-foot tall mixed use development
with 1,110 square feet of commercial floor space and 48 for-rent multi-family residential units
on the northeast corner of Charleston Boulevard and 3rd Street.
ISSUES
Within 18b The Las Vegas Arts District, a Mixed Use development is permitted with the
approval of a Special Use Permit in the C-2 (General Commercial) zoning district. Special
Use Permit (SUP-61048) was approved at 11/18/15 City Council Meeting.
A Major Amendment is required for Special Use Permit (SUP-61048) to add waivers to
allow residential units on the ground floor of the development and to allow the surface
parking lot at the front of the development (north perimeter).
A Waiver of the Downtown Centennial Plan Architectural Design Standards is required to
allow no canopies or awnings at the pedestrian level.
A Waiver from the Downtown Centennial Plan Parking Lot Landscaping requirements was
advertised with this Site Development Plan Review request; this waiver is no longer needed,
as all parking lot landscaping requirements have been met.
The site must be remapped to combine the existing platted lots prior to the issuance of
permits for construction of the primary building. A condition has been added to the site
review to address this issue.
ANALYSIS
This project is located in the Las Vegas Downtown Centennial Plan 18b Arts District and
proposes to construct a three-story Mixed-Use development comprised of three building with 48
residential units and 1,110 square feet of retail space, to be located on the block between
Charleston Boulevard and Coolidge Avenue, and between 3rd Street and a public alley. In
addition, the applicant has also requested a Waiver from the Downtown Centennial Plan
Architectural Design Standards to allow no awnings, canopies or other shading devices at the
pedestrian level.
The subject site is currently comprised of four parcels with a zoning designation of C-2 (General
Commercial), which allows for retail and commercial uses of an intense character, as well as
mixed-use developments. Mixed-Use developments are allowed in the 18b Arts District with an
approved Special Use Permit. The subject site currently has an approved Special Use Permit
(SUP-61048) for a Mixed Use development on the subject site, which was approved at City
JB
SUP-65718 and SDR-65369 [PRJ-65227]

Council on 11/18/15. This entitlement is set to expire on 11/18/17 unless exercised pursuant to
the provisions of LVMC Title 19.16. However, the applicant has requested a Major Amendment
to Special Use Permit (SUP-61048) to add waivers to allow residential units on the ground floor
of the development and to allow the surface parking lot at the front of the development (north
perimeter).
The Mixed Use is defined as, The vertical integration of residential uses and commercial or
civic uses within a single building or a single development, where the uses share pedestrian
access, vehicular access, parking functions, or any combination thereof. The proposed use
meets this definition, as a four-story building is proposed that integrates commercial uses and
parking on the ground level and multi-family residential uses on higher floors. This use requires
a Special Use Permit in any zoning district located within the boundaries of 18b The Las Vegas
Arts District.
This requirement does not apply, as the development would be located in the C-2
(General Commercial) zoning district.
2. Nonresidential uses permitted as of right in the P-O, O and C-1 Zoning Districts may be
permitted by means of a Special Use Permit within an R-3 or R-4 Zoning District.
The proposed use meets this requirement, as 1,110 square feet of ground-level
commercial uses are proposed for this development.
3. Commercial uses or civic uses shall at a minimum be located at the ground level fronting
the primary public rights-of-way and may extend beyond the ground floor. The principal
entryway to access those uses, whether individually or collectively, shall be directly
accessed from and oriented to the public sidewalk.
The proposed use meets this requirement, as the commercial floor space will be located
at ground level facing Charleston Boulevard.
that is located at the interior of the development site and does not front on an arterial or
collector street.
JB
SUP-65718 and SDR-65369 [PRJ-65227]

A waiver is required for this condition, as six residential units are located on the ground
floor of the proposed development adjacent to 3rd Street and Coolidge Avenue.
5. Surface parking lots shall be located to the side or the rear of the principal building(s) on
the site, and shall be screened from view of the adjacent rights-of-way by the principal
building(s) or a landscape buffer in conformance with the requirements of LVMC
Chapter 19.08. Parking structures shall not be located along the street frontages of the
development site, but shall be screened from view of the adjacent rights-of-way by the
principal building(s).
A waiver is required for this condition, as the proposed surface parking lot is located
near the front of the development on Coolidge Avenue. However, the surface parking lot
area is screened from view by an eight-foot tall block wall and seven-foot sliding access
gate which is set back two feet from the north property line.
Downtown Centennial Streetscape Standards have been not met along the sides of the building
facing Charleston Boulevard, 3rd Street and Coolidge Avenue with regard to the proposed width
of the sidewalk and amenity area.The submitted landscape plan indicates 36 box Deglet-Noor
date palms at 20-foot intervals will be provided along Charleston Boulevard and 3rd Street with
36 box African Sumac at 20 intervals provided along Coolidge Avenue. The Deglet-Noor Date
Palm trees proposed along Charleston Boulevard and 3rd Street are inappropriate for
streetscaping in this area per the Downtown Centennial Plan and must be amended to large
canopy shade trees (Southern Live Oak, Shoestring Acacia, African Sumac, Ash or Pistache or
other drought tolerant shade trees as approved by staff as a primary landscape element). A
condition of approval has been added to address this issue.
The three-story structures are 50.5 feet in height and will feature a painted stucco exterior with
synthetic wood and stone veneer accents and a corniced flat roof. Architectural details are carried
around all sides of the buildings. The Downtown Centennial Plan Architectural Design Standards
require canopies or awnings at the pedestrian level; a waiver of this standard has been requested
to allow no canopies or awnings at the pedestrian level. Trash receptacle access from the alley is
acceptable; however, the applicant must verify the pickup route with Republic Services so as not
to cause traffic conflicts.
Except for handicapped parking, Title 19 parking requirements are not automatically applied
within the boundaries of the Downtown Centennial Plan Overlay District, but are subject to
conditions imposed by the City Council if needed. The submitted ground floor plan indicates the
41 parking spaces will be provided on-site for the residential units, which includes twelve (12)
enclosed garage spaces, thirteen (13) covered carport parking spaces and sixteen (16) uncovered
parking spaces including two handicap-accessible parking spaces. The surface parking lot area
provides three 36-box African Sumac trees and approximately 554 square feet of landscape
area, which complies with the Downtown Centennial Plan parking lot landscaping requirements.
However, staff does not support the quantity of parking that will be provided for the overall
JB
SUP-65718 and SDR-65369 [PRJ-65227]

development, as it is less than one parking space per residential unit, with no guest parking and
no additional parking for the proposed commercial tenant space, which will force residents and
guests to find parking on adjacent streets. This will negatively impact the surrounding area.
The parcels are currently served by Las Vegas Valley Water District (LVVWD) with a main on
three sides. The proposed development will require at least one large above-ground backflow
prevention assembly that cannot be placed in the sidewalk, below ground or inside of a
room. Revise the site plan to provide a setback adjacent to the water main to allow for the aboveground water facilities. A Waiver of the Downtown Centennial Plan Standards to allow aboveground utilities within the public right-of-way will be required unless the service is
relocated. Proof of parcel lot consolidation will be required prior to civil plan approval.
The site will need to be remapped to consolidate the existing parcels and platted lots. The map
must be recorded prior to the construction of the main building so as to eliminate conflicts with
existing property lines.
The proposed use and design of this proposal will make a negative contribution to the urban
design for the residents in the immediate area and of the community at large as illustrated
through the required waivers and inadequate parking provided on-site. Staff recommends denial
of the requested Special Use Permit (SUP-65718) and Site Development Plan Review (SDR65369), for the proposed three-story Mixed-Use development with conditions.
1.
The development would provide opportunities for urban living in the Downtown area near
commercial uses and is adjacent to established public transportation lines. However, the
proposed development is not consistent with Title 19.12 Minimum Special Use
Requirement #4 and #5.
2.
Parking will be accommodated through a combination of garage, covered carport and
uncovered surface parking spaces. Insufficient parking has been provided for residents,
with 41 parking spaces proposed for 48 residential units. Staff does not support the
quantity of parking which will be provided for the overall development, as it provides less
JB
SUP-65718 and SDR-65369 [PRJ-65227]

than one parking space per residential unit, no guest parking and no additional parking for
the proposed commercial tenant space, which will force residents and guests to find
parking on adjacent streets. This negatively impacts the surrounding area.
3.
Access to the development would be from 3rd Street and Coolidge Avenue, which are both
80-foot rights-of-way that are well under capacity at this time. These facilities are adequate
to meet the needs of the mixed use development.
4.
General Plan.
The proposed mixed use development will be subject to permit and licensing requirements
and periodic inspections, thereby protecting the public health, safety and general welfare.
5.
The proposed development is not consistent with Title 19.12 Minimum Special Use
Requirement #4, which prohibits residential units to be located on the ground floor and
front primary public rights-of-way. As proposed, there are six residential units that are
located on the ground floor of the development, which front onto 3rd Street and Coolidge
Avenue. In addition, the proposed development also does not meet listed requirement #5,
which requires surface parking lots to be located on the side and rear of the principal
buildings on-site. As designed, the surface parking lot area is located on the front (northern
perimeter) of the development. Staff does not support these requested waivers, as they are
inconsistent with the Title 19.12 requirements for a Mixed-Use development.
1.

The proposed mixed-use development is incompatible with development in the vicinity, as
illustrated by the requested waiver of architectural design requirements and insufficient
parking provided on-site.
JB
SUP-65718 and SDR-65369 [PRJ-65227]

2.
The proposed mixed use development is consistent with Las Vegas 2020 Master Plan
Policy 1.1.3, which encourages new market rate, multi-unit mixed-use residential
development on vacant or underutilized sites, with ground floor commercial components
included where appropriate. However, a waiver of the Downtown Centennial Plan
architectural design requirements has been requested to allow no canopies or awnings at
the pedestrian level.
3.

Access to the development would be from 3rd Street and Coolidge Avenue, which are both
80-foot rights-of-way that are well under capacity at this time. These facilities are adequate
to meet the needs of the mixed use development. The applicant has proposed a seven-foot
tall access rolling gate at both entrances, which will be setback from the property line.
4.
The proposed building materials utilize a painted stucco exterior with synthetic wood and
stone veneer accents and a corniced flat roof, which are typical of mid-rise Downtown
projects. The Deglet-Noor Date Palm trees proposed along Charleston Boulevard and 3rd
Street are inappropriate for streetscaping in this area per the Downtown Centennial Plan
and must be amended to large canopy shade trees (Southern Live Oak, Shoestring Acacia,
African Sumac, Ash or Pistache or other drought tolerant shade trees as approved by staff
as a primary landscape element). A condition of approval has been added to address this
issue.
5.

The proposed elevations are both aesthetically pleasing and compatible with nearby
Downtown development. The building features variation in roofline, color, materials and
popout size. However, the proposed development requires a waiver of the Downtown
Centennial Plan Architectural Design standards to allow no canopies or awnings at the
pedestrian level.
6.
general welfare.
JB
SUP-65718 and SDR-65369 [PRJ-65227]

Development is subject to permitting and inspections, thereby securing the public health,
safety and welfare.
The City Council approved Rezoning (Z-0100-64) from R-1 (Single Family
Residential), R-4 (High Density Residential), C-1 (Limited Commercial), C-2
(General Commercial) and C-V (Civic) to C-2 (General Commercial) for
12/16/64
approximately 230 Acres generally located on property bounded by Main
Street to the west, Bonanza Road on the north, Las Vegas Boulevard on the
east, and Charleston Boulevard on the south, Wards 1 and 3. The Planning
Commission recommended approval on 12/10/64.
for a Mixed Use development at the northeast corner of Charleston Boulevard
and 3rd Street. The Planning Commission and Staff recommended approval
of the request.
11/18/15
(SDR-61050) for a proposed four-story mixed-use development, including
1,750 square feet of commercial space and 60 multi-family residential units,
with a waiver of Downtown Centennial Plan Architectural Design
Requirements at the northeast corner of Charleston Boulevard and 3rd Street.

05/15/15

There are no relevant business licenses or building permits related to this site.
A pre-application meeting was held to discuss submittal requirements for
06/01/16
applications related to a proposed Mixed Use Development.
JB
SUP-65718 and SDR-65369 [PRJ-65227]

Field Check
06/30/16
The site contains retail, office and wedding chapel buildings and associated
parking facilities.

Site Area
Net Acres
0.69
Surrounding
Property
Subject Property
North
South
East
Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12
Office, Other Than
Listed
General Retail
Wedding Chapel
Office, Other Than
Listed
Planned or Special
C (Commercial)
C-2 (General
Commercial)
General Retail
C (Commercial)

(Convenience Store)
Office, Other Than
Listed
Undeveloped
MXU (Mixed Use)
C (Commercial)
C (Commercial)
C-2 (General
Commercial)
MXU (Mixed Use)
R-4 (High Density

Residential) under
Resolution of Intent to C2 (General Commercial
West
Multi-Family
Residential
C-2 (General
Commercial)
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
C-2 (General
Commercial)
Master Plan Areas

Downtown Centennial Plan Overlay District (18b The Las Vegas Arts District)
Trails
Compliance
Y
Compliance
Y
Y
Compliance
N/A
Y
N/A
N/A
JB
SUP-65718 and SDR-65369 [PRJ-65227]

Pursuant to the Downtown Centennial Plan, the following standards apply:
Standard
Required/Allowed
Provided
Min. Lot Size
N/A
30,056 SF
Min. Lot Width
N/A
140 Feet
Min. Setbacks
Front
N/A
2 Feet
Side
N/A
8 Feet
Corner
N/A
0 Feet
Rear
N/A
0 Feet
Max. Lot Coverage
N/A
90 %
N/A
50.5 Feet
Screened, Gated, w/ a Roof
Screened, gated, in
Trash Enclosure
or Trellis
garage interior
Underground within
Within building
Utilities
building footprint
footprint
Mech. Equipment
Screened
Onsite/screened
Street Name
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Charleston Blvd.
Primary Arterial
Coolidge Ave.
3rd Street
Minor Collector
Minor Collector
Governing Document
and Highways Map
Title 13
Title 13
Compliance
N/A
N/A
Y
Y
Y
Y
N/A
N/A
Y
Y
Y
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Compliance
with Street
Section
85-95
80
80
Y
Y
Pursuant to the Downtown Centennial Plan, the following is required:

Streetscape
Required
Provided
Standards
5 amenity zone
5 amenity zone
10 sidewalk
10 sidewalk
Charleston Blvd.
Sidewalk amenities
Not indicated
(East/west street)
Street trees 36 box shade 1536 box Deglet-Noor date
20 intervals
palms at 20 intervals
5 amenity zone
5 amenity zone
10 sidewalk
10 sidewalk
3rd Street
(Minor north/south
Sidewalk amenities
Not indicated
street)
Street trees 36 box shade 1536 box Deglet-Noor date
20 intervals
palms at 20 intervals
Compliance
Y
Y
By condition
By condition
Y
Y
By condition
By condition
JB
SUP-65718 and SDR-65369 [PRJ-65227]

Streetscape
Standards
Coolidge Ave.
(East/west street)
Required
Provided
Compliance
5 amenity zone
10 sidewalk
Sidewalk amenities
Street trees 36 box shade 1520 intervals
5 amenity zone
10 sidewalk
Not indicated
36 box African Sumac at
20 intervals
Y
Y
By condition
Y

Provided
Compliance
Gross Floor
Parking
Parking
Area or
Use
Parking
Number of
HandiHandiRatio
Regular
Regular
Units
capped
capped
Multi-Family
1.25
Residential
48 units
spaces/
60
(Studio/1 BR)
unit
1 space/ 6
Guest Spaces
48 units
8
units
1 space
General Retail
1,110 SF
per 175
7
SF GFA
75
41
Y*
72
3
39
2
Y*
*Projects located within the Las Vegas Downtown Centennial Plan area are not subject to the
the base requirements of an analogous project in another location in the City.
Waivers
Requirement
Request
To allow no arcades,
The use of arcades, awnings and
awnings and canopies
canopies on the ground floor of
on the ground floor of
a building is required
the building
Residential uses shall not be
To allow residential
permitted on the ground floor
units on the ground
fronting on primary public
floor of the
rights-of-way, but may be
development which
located at or above the second
front onto 3rd Street and
level of the building.
Coolidge Avenue.
Surface parking lots shall be
To allow the surface
located to the side or the rear of parking lot at the front
the principal building(s) on the
of the development
site.
(north perimeter)
Denial
Denial
Denial
JB
SUP-65718
SUP-65718
A77
A77
7777
7bA
A
A
7bA
7bA
7bA
7bA
7bA
bA7!7A7b7
7!77Ab777
A7A7777bA7
77Abb7A
77
7!Ab7b7b7A777
bA7!7!7777!77!7A
A7b7A7Ab
Abb
A777bA777b7!7A7A7!7b77!7A
A7AA7
7A7A77A777bA7A7AA77
7777777
7bA
7bA
7bA7
7A
7bA
7bA
7bA7
777
77
77!Ab7b
7A7!77Ab7!7A7
77!Ab7b
A7A7!77Ab7A
b77A7bA
7Ab
7Ab
7Ab
7
7
7
7!7A
77
AbA7AA7
77
777
777A7
7A7
777A7
7A7
7Ab7
A7
A7
7Ab7
777Ab7
777Ab7
A7
7Ab7
777Ab7
777Ab7
7A7
7Ab
777Ab
777Ab
7Ab7
777Ab
777Ab
77
77
7A7
7!
A7777A7A77
7AA7AA7A7Abb77A77A
A A
b7A7A7A777Ab77AbbAb
Ab AbbAb
A7AbA7A77AA77A7A7A77

A
AA

b777
bA
7A7
bAAA
A
bA
7!A
AA
Ab!A
7AbA7
77
A7A
A!bA7Ab7
b77
77
AbA7
Abb7A7A77
77777A7
77777A7
Abb7A7A77
777
A7A7A77
77A777AAbA7A
77bA7777A7A7A7b77A7b
A7Ab7777A77
777Ab7
777Ab7
A7
A7
7
A7
7Ab7
777Ab7
A7
A7
A7
777Ab7
A7
A7
7A77777AA7A7
A7
77
7A7
77777
7A7AA7
7!7
bA7A777Ab777!777!7
I7A
AbA7A7
A77A
77
7!77!7Ab7A7Ab77
!7AA7A7!A7
Ab777777Ab
7!
A77AA7
7Ab7b77Ab7
7Ab
7bA
b7
7bA!bA7
7Ab777
7AA
b7!7A7A
7777
Ab77
77
7!7!7A7Ab7
7
7!
7bA7
7bA7
bA7
A7Ab
7bA
7bA7
7bA7
7bA
7bA
7bA
7bA
7bA
7bA
7bA
7bA
7bA
b77
A7
7
7
7
7
7
7A
77b
b7
7777
77
7b7A
bbA
AbA7A
b b
77 7
7 7 7A A 777 777 7 777777
A77
A77
7777
7bA
A
A
7bA
7bA
7bA
7bA
bA7!7A7b7
7!77Ab777
A7A7777bA7
77Abb7A
77
7!Ab7b7b7A777
bA7!7!7777!77!7A
A7b7A7Ab
Abb
A777bA777b7!7A7A7!7b77!7A
A7AA7
7A7A77A777bA7A7AA77
7777777
77
7!7!7A7Ab7
7bA
7bA
7bA7
7A
7bA
7bA
7bA7
777
77
77!Ab7b
7A7!77Ab7!7A7
77!Ab7b
A7A7!77Ab7A
b77A7bA
7Ab
7Ab
7Ab
7
7
7
7!7A
77
AbA7AA7
77
777
777A7
7A7
777A7
7A7
7Ab7
A7
A7
7Ab7
777Ab7
777Ab7
A7
7Ab7
777Ab7
777Ab7
7A7
7Ab
777Ab
777Ab
7Ab7
777Ab
777Ab
77
77
7A7
7!
A7777A7A77
7AA7AA7A7Abb77A77A
A A
b7A7A7A777Ab77AbbAb
Ab AbbAb
A7AbA7A77AA77A7A7A77

A
AA

b777
bA
7A7
bAAA
A
bA
7!A
AA
Ab!A
7AbA7
77
A7A
A!bA7Ab7
b77
77
AbA7
Abb7A7A77
77777A7
77777A7
Abb7A7A77
777
A7A7A77
77A777AAbA7A
77bA7777A7A7A7b77A7b
A7Ab7777A77
777Ab7
777Ab7
A7
A7
7
A7
7Ab7
777Ab7
A7
A7
A7
777Ab7
A7
A7
7A77777AA7A7
A7
77
7A7
77777
7A7AA7
7!7
bA7A777Ab777!777!7
I7A
AbA7A7
A77A
77
7!77!7Ab7A7Ab77
!7AA7A7!A7
Ab777777Ab
7!
A77AA7
7Ab7b77Ab7
7Ab
7bA
b7
7bA!bA7
7Ab777
7AA
b7!7A7A
7777
Ab77
7bA
7
7!
7bA7
7bA7
bA7
A7Ab
7bA
7bA7
7bA7
7bA
7bA
7bA
7bA
7bA
7bA
7bA
7bA
7bA
b77
A7
7
7
7
7
7
7A
77b
b7
7777
77
7b7A
bbA
AbA7A
b b
77 7
7 7 7A A 777 777 7 777777
!7!
!!77
!!77
7AA
7777
b77
7b7Abb7A
A7Ab
A7A7A
A7Ab
bb7
7777
b77
bb7
bb7A7
7
bb7
A777A7AA
A
bb7
b777
7Ab7b7b7b
A
bb7A7
A777A7AA
A
!7!
!!777
!!77
bb7A7
b777
77b
7AA
7777
77
77 7
777
7b7A
b b
7
bbA7A
7 7 7A A 777 777 7 777777
!7!
!!77
!!77
7AA
!7!
!!77
!!77
7Ab7b7b7b
A
7777
bb7A7
A7Abb7A
A7Ab
b77
7b7Abb7A
A7Ab
b777
7777
b77
A7b
7Ab7b7b7b
A
bb7A7
A7A7A
A7Ab
bb7A7
b777
77b
7
7
7777
77
7AA
77 7
777
7b7A
b b
7
bbA7A
7 7 7A A 777 777 7 777777
A7
AA7
bA7
AA7
bb
7777
AA
AA
bA

bb
A7
7A
77b
b
7A
AA7 bA
AA7 bA
b777!7
7A
bA7
AA7
AA7
AA7
AA7
bA7
AA7 AA7
7A
77
b7 7
7777
777
b b
77 7
7
7b7A
bbA77
!7A
7 7 7A A 777 777 7 777777
A7
7777
7A
b777!7
7A
7A
b7A
7A
A7
7A7
77
77b
7777
777
b b
77 7
7
7b7A
bbA77
!7A
7 7 7A A 777 777 7 777777
7777
7A
b777!7
7A
7A
7A
A7
7A7
77b
7777
77
777
b b
77 7
7
7b7A
bbA77
!7A
7 7 7A A 777 777 7 777777
SUP-65718 [PRJ-65227] SPECIAL USE PERMIT RELATED TO SDR-65369 - APPLICANT/OWNER: BIG

BLOCK PARTNERS, LLC
NORTHEAST CORNER OF CHARLESTON BOULEVARD AND 3RD STREET
06/30/16

BLOCK PARTNERS, LLC
06/30/16

BLOCK PARTNERS, LLC
06/30/16

BLOCK PARTNERS, LLC
06/30/16

BLOCK PARTNERS, LLC
06/30/16

BLOCK PARTNERS, LLC
06/30/16

BLOCK PARTNERS, LLC
06/30/16

BLOCK PARTNERS, LLC
06/30/16
7 7
7b777
77
777
777 7
7
7
777777
777 7 7 77
A77777777777777777
77777777777A7 7777777
777777b7777b7777b67b7
77777777777777777777
7777777777777777777
7777 7777777777777777
777777677777777777777
7777777777777777
7777777777777777777777
7777777777777777b777
777777777777777777 7
7 A7 7 7 A7 7 7 67 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
77777777777
7 7 7 7 7 67 7 7 7 67 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
7777777b7777 777A77776
7777 777777777 77777
77777777777777777777767
7777767777777777777 77
77767677777777777
A7777777777b77777
77@77777777777777b7
b7A777 7 7777777777 777
b777777777777777777
777b7A777777777777777
7777777777677777b77
77677777777b777777b7
7777777777777777777
777777777b77777777777777776
777677777 777777 777777
7777777677777776777
7777777 7777777777777
7777777777
777777A77777777777
777777777777777
A7A
7A
777677
77
@7
7 77 777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777
AA
SUP-65718 and SDR-65369

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: BIG BLOCK PARTNERS, LLC - For possible action on a
request for a Site Development Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED THREE-STORY MIXEDUSE DEVELOPMENT, INCLUDING 1,110 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL SPACE
AND 48 MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL UNITS, WITH A WAIVER OF DOWNTOWN
CENTENNIAL PLAN ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN AND PARKING LOT LANDSCAPING
REQUIREMENTS on 0.69 acres at the northeast corner of Charleston Boulevard and 3rd Street
(APNs 139-34-410-093 through 096), C-2 (General Commercial) Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ65227]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
RECOMMENDATION:

paper use, backup
SDR-65369
SDR-65369
SDR 65369
Big Block Partners, LLC
NEC Charleston Boulevard & 3rd Street

First Use
AM Peak Hour
42.94
1.1
PM Peak Hour
1.00
3.73
47
1
4
Second Use
AM Peak Hour
6.65
APARTMENT [DWELL]
48
PM Peak Hour
0.51
0.62
319
24
30
Total Use
AM Peak Hour
6.65
APARTMENT [DWELL]
PM Peak Hour
48
0.51
0.62
366
25
34

36,006
2,880
3rd Street
2,284
183
Hoover Avenue
867
69

3rd Street
Hoover Avenue

51,800
13,040
13,040
This project will add approximately 366 trips per day on Charleston Blvd., 3rd St. and Hoover Ave. Charleston is currently
at about 70 percent of capacity, 3rd is at about 18 percent of capacity and Hoover is at about 7 percent of capacity. After
this project, Charleston is expected to be unchanged, 3rd to be at about 20 percent of capacity and Hoover to be at about
9 percent of capacity.
Based on Peak Hour use, this development will add into the area roughly 34 additional cars, or about one every two
minutes.

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
TERRY J. HUNT AND EUGENE A. GODINA - For possible action on a request for a Special
Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED SHORT-TERM RESIDENTIAL RENTAL USE WITH A
WAIVER TO ALLOW A 292-FOOT DISTANCE SEPARATION FROM A SIMILAR USE
WHERE 660 FEET IS REQUIRED at 2501 Fulano Way (APN 162-05-715-017), R-1 (Single
Family Residential) Zone, Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-64624]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
RECOMMENDATION:
4. Photo(s)
SUP-65255 [PRJ-64624]

DEPARTMENT:
PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/ OWNER: TERRY J. HUNT AND EUGENE A.
GODINA
CASE
NUMBER
SUP-65255
RECOMMENDATION
conditions:
REQUIRED FOR
APPROVAL
N /A
** NOTIFICATION **
NOTICES MAILED
300
APPROVALS
PROTESTS
28
RG
SUP-65255 [PRJ-64624]
Conditions Page One
** CONDITIONS **
Planning
1.
Residential Rental use, except as amended herein.
2.
3.
A Waiver from Title 19.12 is hereby approved, to allow a 292-foot distance separation
from another Short-Term Residential Rental use, where 660 feet is required.
4.
Safety.
5.
6.
RG
SUP-65255 [PRJ-64624]
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This is a request for a Special Use Permit to allow a Short-Term Residential Rental use at 2501
Fulano Way. The subject property is located within 292 feet from a similar use; therefore, a
waiver of the distance separation from similar use has been requested as part of this application.
Staff recommends denial as the proposed use does not meet the minimum requirements of Title
19.12. If this Special Use Permit is approved, it is subject to conditions.
ISSUES
A Short-Term Residential Rental use is permitted in R-1 (Single Family Residential) zoning
district as a Condition of Approval. A distance separation of 660 feet from a similar use is
required as both a Conditional Use Regulation and as a Special Use Permit Requirement. As
this requirement cannot be met, a Special Use Permit is needed with a waiver to the distance
separation of 292 feet where 660 feet is required.
ANALYSIS
The subject property contains a single family dwelling and the applicant is proposing a ShortTerm Residential Rental use at 2501 Fulano Way. The property is in the airport overlay and the
proposed use will not affect the overlay. Currently, another Short-Term Residential Rental use is
located at 1913 Calanda Court, which is 292 feet from the subject property. No Business
License review has been conducted for the subject site. A waiver request through the special use
permit application would allow the proposed use be within 660 feet. This application request is
in response to a Code Enforcement action on 02/02/16.
The Short-Term Residential Rental use is defined as The commercial use, or the making
available for commercial use, of a residential dwelling unit for dwelling, lodging or sleeping
purposes, wherein any individual guest rents or occupies the unit for a period of less than 31
consecutive calendar days. This use does not include a Community Residence, Facility for
Transitional Living for Released Offenders, or any other facility with dwelling units that is
specifically defined in Chapter 19.18.
The proposed use meets the definition the applicant is proposing the use of the existing dwelling
for commercial use for dwelling, lodging or sleeping purposes. The guest will rent the unit for
less than 31 consecutive calendar days.
RG
SUP-65255 [PRJ-64624]
1. The operator must obtain a business license to operate the use.
If this Special Use Permit is approved, the applicant will be required to obtain a business
license.
2. The use must comply on an ongoing basis with all governmental licensing and regulatory
requirements, including the payment of applicable room taxes and licensing fees.
If a business license is issued for the Short-Term Residential Rental will be subject to
license renewal and annual compliance review to ensure that all regulatory requirements
are being met.
3. The use must comply with the Citys noise regulations as they apply to residential uses.
If this use violates the Citys noise regulations, neighbors or members of the public can
file a complaint to the Code Enforcement Division, which would result in a fine.
4. Vehicle parking associated with the use shall comply with applicable parking regulations,
and vehicles of guests and invitees shall not obstruct traffic or access to other properties
in the area.
If the parking regulations are violated or any traffic obstruction to other properties, the
public can either call the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department or the Business
License Division for non-compliance of business license requirements.
5. In addition to and independent of any enforcement authority or remedy described in this
Title, the failure to comply with a Minimum Special Use Permit Requirement or other
condition of approval associated with this use may be enforced as in the case of a
violation of Title 6 by means of a civil proceeding pursuant to LVMC 6.02.400 to
6.02.460, inclusive.
This application if approved will be subject to annual review for compliance of the
special use permit by the Department of Planning.
6. The use may not be located closer than 660 feet to any other Short-Term Residential
Rental use (measured from property line to property line).
RG
SUP-65255 [PRJ-64624]
The subject property is within 292 feet from another Short-Term Residential Rental use.
This Special Use Permit application is accompanied with a request for a waiver of the
distance separation.
7. The maximum occupancy of the residential dwelling unit shall not exceed the limits
provided for in LVMC 6.75.090.
Business License will conduct compliance inspections once a business license is
approved for compliance review.
The proposed Short-Term Residential Rental use will not be compatible with the surrounding
residential uses due to the existing similar use that is currently licensed within 292 feet from the
proposed subject property. The minimum special use permit requirements specify that the
distance to similar uses shall be at 660 feet; therefore, staff recommends denial. If this
application is approved, it is subject to conditions.
1.
The proposed land use cannot be conducted in a manner that is harmonious and
compatible with the existing surrounding land uses due to the waiver request of 292-foot
distance separation from similar uses.
2.
The subject site is not physically suitable for the type and intensity of land use proposed
due to the similar uses within 292 feet.
3.
The facility can be accessed from Fulano Way, a local street.
4.
General Plan.
RG
SUP-65255 [PRJ-64624]
condition of approval and business license approval and compliance.
5.
The proposed use does not meet all of the applicable conditions of Title 19.12. The use
may not be closer than 660 feet from any other Short-Term Residential Rental use. The
applicant is requesting a waiver to allow 292-foot distance separation.
A code enforcement case (#163048) was processed for an illegal Short-Term
02/02/16
Residential Rental operating at 2501 Fulano Way. The case is currently open.

07/18/03

A building permit (#9808-4) was issued for Single Family Dwelling at 2501
03/26/81
Fulano Way. The permit was finalized on 09/20/82.
A building permit (#44340) was issued for a Balcony at 2501 Fulano Way.
07/21/05
The permit was finalized on 04/08/06.
A building permit (#65736) was issued for a Spa at 2501 Fulano Way. The
05/24/06
permit was finalized on 10/23/06.
Special Use Permit submittal requirements. The applicant was informed that
05/10/16
another Short-Term Residential Rental Use is within the required 660-foot
distance separation; therefore, will require to request for a waiver of the
distance separation allow within 292 feet of the subject property.
RG
SUP-65255 [PRJ-64624]
Field Check
06/30/16
Staff conducted field check of the subject property and observed that the
property is well maintained.

Site Area
Net Acres
0.25
Surrounding
Property
Subject Property
North
South
East
West
Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12
Single Family,
Detached
Single Family,
Detached
Single Family,
Detached
Single Family,
Detached
Single Family,
Detached
Planned or Special
L (Low Density
Residential)
L (Low Density
Residential)
L (Low Density
Residential)
L (Low Density
Residential)
L (Low Density
Residential)

R-1 (Single Family
Residential)
R-1 (Single Family
Residential)
R-1 (Single Family
Residential)
R-1 (Single Family
Residential)
R-1 (Single Family
Residential)
Master Plan Areas

A-O (Airport Overlay) District (200 Feet)
Trails
Compliance
N/A
Compliance
Y
Compliance
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
RG
SUP-65255
SUP-65255
SUP-65255
SUP-65255
SUP-65255
SUP-65255
SUP-65255
SUP-65255
SUP-65255
SUP-65255 [PRJ-64624] SPECIAL USE PERMIT - APPLICANT/ OWNER: TERRY J. HUNT AND EUGENE
A. GODINA
2501 FULANO WAY
06/30/16
SUP-65255

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
SUP-65402 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: JAMMYLAND OWNER: ANTIQUA, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR A
PROPOSED 2,315 SQUARE-FOOT TAVERN-LIMITED ESTABLISHMENT USE WITH
2,850 SQUARE FEET OF OUTDOOR SEATING AREA at 1121 South Main Street (APN 16203-110-079), C-M (Commercial/Industrial) Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-65207]. Staff
recommends APPROVAL.
RECOMMENDATION:
4. Photo(s)
SUP-65402 [PRJ-65207]

DEPARTMENT:
PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: JAMMYLAND - OWNER: ANTIQUA, LLC
CASE
NUMBER
SUP-65402
RECOMMENDATION
REQUIRED FOR
APPROVAL
** NOTIFICATION **
NOTICES MAILED
124
APPROVALS
PROTESTS
31
SS
SUP-65402 [PRJ-65207]
Conditions Page One
** CONDITIONS **
Planning
1.
2.
Safety.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Municipal Code.
7.
Public Works
8.
Submit an Encroachment Agreement for landscaping or private improvements in the Main

Street public right-of-way, if any, prior to the issuance of permits for these improvements.
The applicant must carry an insurance policy for the term of the Encroachment Agreement
and add the City of Las Vegas as an additionally insured entity on this insurance policy. If
requested by the City, the applicant shall remove property encroaching in the public rightof-way at the applicant's expense pursuant to the terms of the City's Encroachment
Agreement. The installation and maintenance of all private improvements in the public
right-of-way shall be the responsibility of the applicant and any successors in interest to the
property and assigns pursuant to the terms of the Encroachment Agreement. Coordinate all
requirements for the Encroachment Agreement with the Land Development Section of the
Department of Building and Safety (702-229-4836).
SS
SUP-65402 [PRJ-65207]
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is requesting a 2,315 square-foot Tavern-Limited Establishment within an existing
building at 1121 South Main Street, located within 18b The Las Vegas Arts District. Two
outdoor seating areas totaling 2,850 square feet for alcohol service are also proposed.
ISSUES
A Tavern-Limited Establishment is a permitted use in the C-M (Commercial/Industrial)

zoning district and 18b The Las Vegas Arts District with approval of a Special Use Permit.
Any improvements in the public right-of-way will require approval of an encroachment
agreement with the City of Las Vegas.
ANALYSIS
The subject property is zoned C-M (Commercial/Industrial) and is located midblock between
Charleston Boulevard and California Street. The existing building is sandwiched between two
existing retail buildings on the north and south sides. The front is set back approximately 45 feet
from the Main Street right-of-way and has no side yard setback on either side. An uncovered
seating area of approximately 2,200 square feet is proposed in this front yard setback area. The
other uncovered outdoor seating area would be located at the rear of the building, but walled off
from the adjacent alley to allow for access to a loading zone, trash enclosure and service area.
Access to the building from the outdoor patios is through roll up doors located on the east and
west sides of the building.
The Tavern-Limited Establishment use is defined as an establishment that is licensed with a
tavern-limited license in accordance with LVMC Chapter 6.50. The proposed use meets the
definition, as the applicant is seeking an entitlement to serve alcoholic beverages on the premises
on a location contained within the Downtown Centennial Plan Overlay District. The proposed
outdoor seating fulfills one of the requisite conditions for obtaining a tavern-limited license.
There are no Minimum Special Use Permit Requirements for this use; however, there are
specific licensing requirements that affect the operation and performance of this use. According
to staffs distance separation map, five urban lounges, two tavern-limited establishments and one
tavern are located within 1,500 feet of the subject property. As there are no separation
requirements between Tavern-Limited Establishments and these other uses, the use conforms to
Title 19. No waivers or variances are needed for approval of this application.
SS
SUP-65402 [PRJ-65207]
There is no current onsite parking and no new parking spaces are proposed. The property can be
accessed by pedestrians from nearby transit stops, and accommodations for bike racks are
provided. On-street metered parking spaces and nearby surface parking lots are available for
vehicles to use. It appears that the bike racks and entrance to the establishment may be located
within excess right-of-way. A condition of approval addresses this issue by requiring an
encroachment agreement for any private improvements within the public right-of-way.
The indoor floor area is 2,315 square feet and contains a bar, lounge area, kitchen and restrooms.
A 48 square-foot entertainment area is located in the front patio area just outside the building.
As it contains less than 50 square feet of entertainment space, the venue does not qualify as a
Nightclub per Title 19.12.
According to the Las Vegas Valley Water District (LVVWD), this parcel is currently served but
does not have the required backflow prevention per NAC 445A.67195. Civil and plumbing
plans will need to be submitted to LVVWD for domestic meter sizing, fire flow availability and
backflow retrofit. It should be noted that the main and meter serving this parcel are located on
California Street and the above-ground backflow prevention assembly will be within the right-ofway unless the service is relocated. A Waiver of the Downtown Centennial Plan Standards to
allow above-ground utilities within the public right-of-way will be required unless the service is
relocated.
As the proposed use can be conducted in a manner that is compatible with the adjacent uses, staff
recommends approval with conditions. If denied, a business license to sell alcoholic beverages
for on-premise consumption could not be issued.
1.
The proposed Tavern-Limited Establishment use can be conducted in a manner that is
harmonious and compatible with existing and future surrounding land uses.
2.
The subject site is physically suitable for a proposed Tavern-Limited Establishment use
within a restaurant and is in close proximity to other Taverns and Urban Lounges in the
neighborhood.
SS
SUP-65402 [PRJ-65207]
3.
Site access is provided from Main Street, a 100-foot wide Primary Arterial as designated in
the Master Plan of Streets and Highways, and a 20-foot wide rear alley. Main Street is
sufficient in size to accommodate the needs of the proposed use; however, vehicular access
is provided only by the rear alley to service areas.
4.
General Plan.
Approval of this proposed Special Use Permit will not compromise the public health,
safety and general welfare of the public. The use will be subject to regular inspections and
is subject to licensing restrictions.
5.
There are no applicable Minimum Special Use Permit Requirements listed in Title 19.12
for the Tavern-Limited Establishment use.
There are no relevant actions related to this site.

02/05/13

There are no relevant records of building permits for this site.
A business license (M50-00063) was issued for fabrication and sales of signs
03/19/12
at 1121 South Main Street. The license was marked out of business on
07/16/13.
A business license (M50-00075) was issued for a sign shop and sign sales at
05/15/13
1121 South Main Street. The license was marked out of business on
06/01/14.
SS
SUP-65402 [PRJ-65207]
A pre-application meeting was held to discuss submittal requirements for a
06/16/16
Special Use Permit.
Field Check
06/30/16
The existing building is set back on the property. Buildings on both sides of
the site are built to the property line, creating a canyon effect. There is
graffiti on the alley side of the building.

Site Area
Net Acres
0.15
Surrounding
Property
Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12
Planned or Special
Vacant
C (Commercial)
North
C (Commercial)
South
C (Commercial)
East
Undeveloped
MXU (Mixed Use)
West
Liquor
Establishment
(Tavern)
C (Commercial)
Subject Property

C-M
C-M
C-M
C-1 (Limited
Commercial)
C-M
Master Plan Areas

Downtown Centennial Plan Overlay District (18b The Las Vegas Arts District)
Compliance
Y
Compliance
Y
N/A
SS
SUP-65402 [PRJ-65207]

Trails (Tortoise Shared Use Trail)
Compliance
Y
Y
N/A
N/A
Street Name
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Main Street
Primary Arterial
Governing Document
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
Compliance
with Street
Section

and Highways Map
85

Provided
Compliance
Gross Floor
Parking
Parking
Area or
Use
Parking
HandiHandiNumber of
Ratio
Regular
Regular
capped
capped
Units
1 space
990 SF indoor per 50 SF
plus 2850 SF
seating
77
outdoor patio
and
Tavernwaiting
Limited
1 space
Establishment
per 200
1,325 SF back
SF of
7
of house
remaining
GFA
84
0
N
80
4
0
0
N
1 for less
Loading
than
2,315 SF
1
1
Y
Spaces
10,000 SF
GFA
Projects located within the Las Vegas Downtown Centennial Plan area are not subject to the
the requirements of an analogous project in another location in the City.
SS
SUP-65402
SUP-65402
SUP-65402 - REVISED
SUP-65402 [PRJ-65207] SPECIAL USE PERMIT - APPLICANT: JAMMYLAND - OWNER: ANTIQUA, LLC
1121 SOUTH MAIN STREET
06/30/16
06/30/16
06/30/16
7
77
77
7777
77
7
7777777
777
b777
7
777
777
7b77777A7777777
A77
7777b
7777777777777
777 777777777
7777777777777777
777775777A77
7777777777777777
7777777777777
7777777777777
7
7
7

SUP-65402 - REVISED

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
SDR-65421 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT/OWNER: SCHOOL BOARD OF TRUSTEES - For possible action on a request
for a Site Development Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED 21,570 SQUARE-FOOT
EXPANSION TO AN EXISTING 68,764 SQUARE-FOOT PUBLIC SCHOOL, PRIMARY
WITH A WAIVER OF PERIMETER LANDSCAPING on 9.5 acres at 1200 North Mallard
Street (APN 138-25-201-001), C-V (Civic) Zone, Ward 5 (Barlow) [PRJ-65245]. Staff
recommends APPROVAL.
RECOMMENDATION:
4. Photo(s)
6. Support Postcard
SDR-65421 [PRJ-65245]

DEPARTMENT:
PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: SCHOOL BOARD OF TRUSTEES
CASE
NUMBER
SDR-65421
RECOMMENDATION
REQUIRED FOR
APPROVAL
** NOTIFICATION **
NOTICES MAILED
563
APPROVALS
PROTESTS
24
FS
SDR-65421 [PRJ-65245]
Conditions Page One
** CONDITIONS **
Planning
1.
2.
3.
Waiver from Title 19.08 is hereby approved to allow no landscape buffer area along a
portion of the south and east property lines where 15 feet is required.
4.
An Exception from Title 19.08 is hereby approved to allow 10 perimeter trees along
portions of the north, east and south property lines where 38 are required.
5.
An Exception from Title 19.08 is hereby approved, to allow 16 parking lot trees where 18
are required.
6.
Safety.
7.
8.
9.
FS
SDR-65421 [PRJ-65245]
Conditions Page Two
10.
Public Works
11.
to this site in accordance with code requirements of Title 13.56.040, if any, to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer concurrent with development of this site.
12.
Landscape and maintain all unimproved right-of-way adjacent to this site. All landscaping
and private improvements installed with this project shall be situated and maintained so as
to not create sight visibility obstructions for vehicular traffic at all development access
drives and abutting street intersections.
13.
construction plans, the issuance of any building or grading permits, whichever may occur
FS
SDR-65421 [PRJ-65245]
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The request is for a 30,994 square-foot addition to an existing Public School, Primary, and a new
107 space staff parking lot located at the northwest corner of Mallard Street and Rae Drive.
ISSUES
When adjacent to residential uses in the R-1 (Single Family Residential) zoning district,
development in the C-V (Civic) district are subject to the height standards of Title 19.06.060,
the landscape buffer standards of Title 19.08.040(F) and Table 4 of Title 19.08.050, the
parking standards of Title 19.08.110, and residential adjacency standards. The site does not
meet the perimeter landscape buffer standards of Title 19.08 and a waiver has been requested
to provide relief from this requirement.
A perimeter landscape waiver has been requested along the south and east property lines to
allow fewer perimeter trees and a zero foot buffer width. Staff recommends approval of the
request.
A parking lot landscaping exception has been requested to allow 16 parking lot trees where
18 are required. Staff recommends approval of the request.
The site is parking impaired and the applicant is responsible for providing parking for any
increase over the existing parking requirement. The increase with the proposal is 15 parking
spaces, which have been accommodated on the site.
ANALYSIS
Development Standards are typically established with approval of a Site Development Plan Review
for a C-V (Civic) zoned parcel; however, when adjacent to residential uses in the R-1 (Single
Family Residential) zoning district, they are subject to the height standards of Title 19.06.060, the
landscape buffer standards of Title 19.08.040(F) and Table 4 of Title 19.08.050, the parking
standards of Title 19.08.110, and residential adjacency standards.
The site plan and elevations depict a two-story classroom building located at the southeast portion
of the site. The building elevations depict a 34-foot flat roofed building finished with an exterior of
smooth and split face CMU. A new bus drop-off zone will be located adjacent to the proposed
building and will receive access from Saylor Way and Rae Drive. The new building will allow for
the removal of seven of the nine portable buildings at the northwest corner of the site. This area will
be replaced with a new 107 space staff parking lot. With the removal of the portables and addition
FS
SDR-65421 [PRJ-65245]
of the new classroom building, the classrooms count goes from 54 to 59, for a net gain of five
classrooms. The site is parking impaired and the addition of the new building requires the
accommodation of 15 additional parking spaces required by the classroom gain. There are
currently 135 on-site parking spaces and 150 are required as the site is currently proposed. There
are 151 spaces proposed with the plan and the additional required parking by the new classrooms
will be accommodated as required. The provided floor plans indicate that the building will have a
total of 18 classrooms with associated staff and storage rooms.
A perimeter landscape waiver has been requested to allow a no landscape buffer area along a
portion south and east property lines, and to allow 10 perimeter trees along portions of the north,
east and south property lines. Staff recommends approval of the waiver, as there is currently no
landscape buffering within these areas, and the addition of 10 trees will be an improvement over the
existing condition. In addition, the bus drop-off encroaches into the required buffer areas, but will
make site circulation safer and more efficient for both students and residents utilizing the local street
network.
An exception has been requested to allow 16 parking lot trees where 18 are required for the new
parking lot. Title 19.08 requires that one parking lot tree is provided for every six spaces. Staff
recommends approval of the request as the new parking lot has been adequately screened from the
adjacent single family residential.
1.

With approval of the associated waiver and exception, the proposed addition to the
existing school is compatible with adjacent development and development in the area.
2.
With the approval of the associated waiver and exception, the proposed development is
consistent with the General Plan, this Title, the Design Standards Manual, the Landscape,
Wall and Buffer Standards, and other duly-adopted city plans, policies and standards.
3.

FS
SDR-65421 [PRJ-65245]
Site access and circulation do not negatively impact adjacent roadways or neighborhood
traffic.
4.
The building and landscape materials are appropriate for the area and for the City.
5.

The building elevations and design characteristics are not unsightly or obnoxious in
appearance, and are harmonious and compatible with development in the area.
6.
general welfare.
The public health, safety and welfare will be protected through the permitting and
inspection process.
The City Council approved a Rezoning (ZON-37853) from R-1 (Single
07/07/10
Family Residential) to C-V (Civic). Staff and the Planning Commission had
recommended approval on 05/27/10.
Issues discussed included parking requirements for the new building and
06/23/16
general submittal requirements.
Field Check
06/30/16
A site visit occurred; there is an existing elementary school on the property
FS
SDR-65421 [PRJ-65245]

Site Area
Net Acres
9.50
Surrounding
Property
Subject Property
North
South
East
West
Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12
Public School,
Primary
Single Family,
Detached
Single Family,
Detached
Single Family,
Detached
Single Family,
Detached
Planned or Special
PF (Public Facility)
C-V (Civic)
L (Low Density
Residential)
L (Low Density
Residential)
L (Low Density
Residential)
L (Low Density
Residential)
R-1 (Single Family

Residential)
R-1 (Single Family
Residential)
R-1 (Single Family
Residential)
R-1 (Single Family
Residential)
Master Plan Areas

Compliance
N/A
Compliance
C-V (Civic) District
N
A-O (Airport Overlay) District
Y
Compliance
Trails
N/A
Y
N/A
N/A
Development Standards are typically established with a Site Development Plan Review for a CV (Civic) zoned parcel; however, when they are adjacent to residential uses in the R-1 (Single
Family Residential) zoning district, they are subject to the height standards of Title 19.06.060,
the landscape buffer standards of Title 19.08.040(F) and Table 4 of Title 19.08.050, and the
parking standards of Title 19.08.110.The site does not meet the perimeter landscape buffer
standards of Title 19.08 and a waiver has been requested to provide relief from this requirement.
FS
SDR-65421 [PRJ-65245]
Pursuant to Title 19.10 and 19.06, the following standards apply:
Standard
Required/Allowed
Min. Lot Size
N/A
Min. Lot Width
N/A
Min. Setbacks
N/A
Front
N/A
Corner
N/A
Rear
Max. Lot Coverage
N/A
35 Feet
Provided
9.5 acres
500 Feet
Compliance
N/A
N/A
100 Feet
N/A
15 Feet
N/A
52 Feet
N/A
17%
N/A
34 Feet
Y
Screened,
Gated, w/
Trash Enclosure
Y
a Roof or Trellis
Trellis
Mech. Equipment
Screened
Screened
Y
Development Standards are typically established with a Site Development Plan Review for a CV (Civic) zoned parcel; however, when they are adjacent to residential uses in the R-1 (Single
Family Residential) zoning district, the height standards of Title 19.06.060 apply. The site is in
compliance with the maximum building height.
Pursuant to Title 19.08 and 19.10, the following standards apply:
Required
Standards
Ratio
Trees
Buffer Trees:
North
14 Trees
South
14 Trees
10 Trees
East
Parking Area Trees
Min. Zone Width
North
15 Feet
South
15 Feet
15 Feet
East
Wall Height
Provided
Compliance
4 Trees
3 Trees
3 Trees
N
N
N
38 Trees
10 Trees
18 Trees
16 Trees
21 Feet
0 Feet
20 Feet
Y
N
Y
Not Indicated
N/A
FS
SDR-65421 [PRJ-65245]
Development Standards are typically established with the a Site Development Plan Review for a
C-V (Civic) zoned parcel; however, when they are adjacent to residential uses in the R-1 (Single
Family Residential) zoning district, the landscape buffer standards of Title 19.08.040(F) applies.
Within the portions of the site being built out with this request, the site does not meet Title 19
perimeter landscape standards and a waiver has been requested to provide relief from this
requirement.
Street Name
Mallard Street
Saylor Way
Rae Drive
Carmen Boulevard
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
Residential Street
N/A
Residential Street
Residential Street
Governing Document
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
50 ft.
80 ft.
50 ft.
50 ft.
Compliance
with Street
Section
Y
Y
Y
Y
Parking Requirement
Required
Provided
Compliance
Gross Floor
Parking
Parking
Area or
Use
Parking
HandiHandiNumber of
Ratio
Regular
Regular
capped
capped
Units
3 spaces
Public School, 59
per
177
Primary
Classrooms
classroom
177
151
Y
171
6
146
5
Y
Development Standards are typically established with the site plan for a C-V (Civic) zoned parcel;
however, when they are adjacent to residential uses in the R-1 (Single Family Residential) zoning
district, the parking standards of Title 19.08.110 applies. The subject site is parking impaired and
the applicant is only responsible for the net increase of parking from additional classrooms. The
new building will allow for the removal of seven of the nine portable buildings at the northwest
corner of the site. This area will be replaced with a new 107 space staff parking lot. With the
removal of the portables and addition of the new classroom building, the classrooms count goes
from 54 to 59, for a net gain of five classrooms. The site is parking impaired and the addition of the
new building requires the accommodation of 15 additional parking spaces required by the classroom
gain. There are currently 135 on-site parking spaces and 150 are required as the site is currently
proposed. There are 151 spaces proposed with the plan and the additional required parking by the
new classrooms will be accommodated as required.
FS
SDR-65241
SDR-65241
SDR-65241
SDR-65241
SDR-65241
bA7 77
7A7
A7
A77
7A7A
7Ab
77b7

7
7
bA7A
7A
777A7bA7
7A7A7A7
b7AAA7
7A7b7b7
SDR-65421 - REVISED
AA
7
bA
Ab7
bA7
7
A7AA77
7Ab
A777
A7A77b7Abb7
7 7 7
b7A77A7A
77'7A
A7
7Ab
7Ab
A7777
7bA77
7Ab
A777
A7A77b7Abb7
7bA77
A777
A7AA
b7AA777
77 7
7bA7A7
7bA
7
7
77AA7
7AA77
7
A77AA77
7Ab
7AA7
77
b77
A7
7AA
b7A77
7b77b7
A7A7AA7
A7Abb
77A7
A7A7AA7
7
bAb
bb7
bb7b7
A7
A7b7
A
bb7
A
b7
A7
7AA77A7A7
A7A7AA7
77
7AA7
A7
A7A
A7
A
bA7 77
7A777
A7
AA7
SDR-65241
7A
7 7 7
bb7
bb7b7
A7
A7b7
A
bb7
A
b7
A7
7AA77A7A7
77bA
A7A7AA7
77
7AA7
A7
bA7
A7A
b
A7
A
bA7 77
7A7
A77
7A7A
7Ab
77b7

7
7
bA7A
7A
777A7bA7
7A7A7A7
b7AAA7
7A7b7b7
SDR-65241
AA
7
bA
Ab7
bA7
7
A777
A7A77b7Abb7
7 7 7
b7A77A7A
77'7A
A7
7Ab
7Ab
A7777
7bA77
7Ab
7Ab
A777
A7A77b7Abb7
7bA77
A777
A7AA
b7AA777
77 7
A7AA77
7bA
7
7
77AA7
7bA7A7
7AA77
7
7AA7 7
A77AA777
7Ab
77
b77
A7
7AA
b7A77
7b77b7
A7A7AA7
A7Abb
77A7
A7A7AA7
7
bAb
bb7
bb7b7
A7
A7b7
A
bb7
A
b7
A7
7AA77A7A7
A7A7AA7
77
7AA7
A7
A7A
A7
A
SDR-65421 - REVISED
SDR-65241
77A7
bA7 77
77A7
bA7 77
77A7
bA7 77
A77A7
bA7 77
SDR-65421 - REVISED
7 7
7 7
7 7
7 7
b77
AAb7b
7Ab
b777Ab
b77
AAb7b
7
b7
7A777A
b77A
777Ab7A
7777A
A7bA7A
b77Ab7A
7777A
A
b7bA
A77A
b77A
7777Ab7A
777 7Ab7A
7bA
b77A
777Ab7A
7777A
b77
AAb7b
7
b7
b77
AAb7b
7
b7A
bb7
bb7b7
A7
bb7
A
A7
7AA77A7A7
A7A7AA7
77
b7
A7b7
A7
A7
b
A7
A
77A7
bA7 77
77A7
bA7 77
77A7
bA7 77
A77A77A7
bA7 77
7 7
7 7
SDR-65241
7 7
7 7
b77
AAb7b
7Ab
b777Ab
b77
AAb7b
7
b7
7bA
b77A
777Ab7A
7777A
A7bA7A
b77Ab7A
7777A
A
b7bA
A77A
b77A
7777Ab7A
777 7Ab7A
7A777A
b77A
777Ab7A
7777A
b77
AAb7b
7
b7
b77
AAb7b
7
b7A
bb7
bb7b7
A7
bb7
A
A7
7AA77A7A7
A7A7AA7
77
b7
A7b7
A7
A7
b
A7
A
77A7
77777A
AAb7
7777777777777777777777777777A
b77Ab
777777777777A7
7777777777777A
77Ab7b
AAb7b
b777Ab
77A
AAb7
7777777777777777777777777777A
b77Ab
777777777777A7
777777777777Ab7A
777b
AAb7b
b7A
SDR-65421 - REVISED
777b
AAb7b
b7
7 7
777b
AAb7b
b7
bb7
bb7b7
A7
A7b7
bb7
A
b7
A7
7AA77A7A7
A7A7AA7
77
bA7 77
A7
b
A7
A
bA7 77 7
b777A77 77
bA7 77
SDR-65241
7 7
7 7
bb7
bb7b7
A7
A7b7
bb7
A
b7
A7
7AA77A7A7
A7A7AA7
77
777A77 77
A7
b
A7
A
SDR-65421 [PRJ-65245] SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - APPLICANT/OWNER: SCHOOL BOARD

OF TRUSTEES
1200 NORTH MALLARD STREET
06/30/16

OF TRUSTEES
06/30/16

OF TRUSTEES
06/30/16

OF TRUSTEES
06/30/16

OF TRUSTEES
06/30/16

OF TRUSTEES
06/30/16

OF TRUSTEES
06/30/16
SDR-65241

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
SDR-65423 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT/OWNER: 1337 R E GROUP, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Site
Development Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED THREE-STORY, 18,657 SQUARE-FOOT
OFFICE AND RESTAURANT BUILDING WITH A WAIVER OF DOWNTOWN
CENTENNIAL PLAN STREETSCAPE AND PARKING LOT LANDSCAPING
REQUIREMENTS on 0.56 acres at the northwest corner of Charleston Boulevard and Casino
Center Boulevard (APN 139-34-410-047), C-2 (General Commercial) Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin)
RECOMMENDATION:
4. Photo(s)
SDR-65423 [PRJ-65299]

DEPARTMENT:
PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: 1337 R E GROUP, LLC
CASE
NUMBER
SDR-65423
RECOMMENDATION
REQUIRED FOR
APPROVAL

conditions:
** NOTIFICATION **
NOTICES MAILED
385
APPROVALS
PROTESTS
31
FS
SDR-65423 [PRJ-65299]
Conditions Page One
** CONDITIONS **
Planning
1.
2.
3.
A Waiver from Downtown Centennial Plan streetscape requirements to allow a five-foot

sidewalk and no amenity zone along Art Way where a ten-foot sidewalk and five-foot
amenity zone is required; and to allow eight street trees along Charleston Boulevard where
14 street trees are required.
4.
Safety.
5.
Mechanical equipment and trash enclosures shall be screened per Downtown Centennial
Plan standards.
6.
7.
Where the parking lot faces a public street, a 42-inch high decorative fence shall be
provided to screen the parking lot from the right-of-way. The design of the screen fence
shall be in conformance with the specifications described in Graphic 10 of the Downtown
Centennial Plan.
8.

of any traffic control device. The technical landscape plan shall indicate that the minimum
street tree size is 36-inch box and spaced 20 feet on-center.
FS
SDR-65423 [PRJ-65299]
Conditions Page Two
9.
10.
11.
Public Works
12.
Grant a Pedestrian Access Easement for any sidewalk located outside of the public right-ofway prior to the issuance of any permits.
13.
this site, if any, and replace with new improvements meeting Downtown Centennial Plan
Standards concurrent with development of this site, except as amended by conditions
herein.
14.
Relocate the existing Sanitary Sewer line at a depth and location acceptable to the Sanitary
Sewer Planning Section of the Department of Public Works and vacate the Public Sewer
Easement reserved by documents 20061208:05096 and 20060623:00739 concurrent with
on-site development activities. Alternatively, revise the site layout so that no landscaping
over 3 feet tall and no structures of any kind are within the existing Public Sewer
Easements reserved by documents 20061208:05096 and 20060623:00739. If relocating
existing public sewer lines, new Public Sewer Easements must be granted prior to issuance
of construction permits or the vacation of existing public easements.
15.
Landscape and maintain all unimproved right-of-way, if any, adjacent to this site. All
16.
Obtain an Occupancy Permit from the Nevada Department of Transportation (NDOT) for
all driveways or other private improvements, if any, in the Charleston Boulevard public
right-of-way adjacent to this site prior to constructing any improvements within NDOT
jurisdiction.
FS
SDR-65423 [PRJ-65299]
17.
Sign and record a Covenant Running with Land agreement for the possible future
installation and/or relocation of half-street improvements in accordance with Downtown
Centennial Standards for all improvements not required to be constructed at this time as a
result of the requested Waiver. Such Covenant Running with Land agreement shall record
prior to the issuance of any permits or the recordation of a map for this site, whichever may
occur first.
18.
Submit an Encroachment Agreement for landscaping, private improvements, and parking

spaces in the Casino Center Boulevard, Charleston Boulevard, and Art way public rightsof-way prior to the issuance of permits for these improvements. The applicant must carry
an insurance policy for the term of the Encroachment Agreement and add the City of Las
Vegas as an additionally insured entity on this insurance policy. If requested by the City,
the applicant shall remove property encroaching in the public right-of-way at the
applicant's expense pursuant to the terms of the City's Encroachment Agreement. The
installation and maintenance of all private improvements in the public right of way shall be
the responsibility of the applicant and any successors in interest to the property and assigns
pursuant to the terms of the Encroachment Agreement. Coordinate all requirements for the
Encroachment Agreement with the Land Development Section of the Department of
Building and Safety (229-4836).
19.
construction plans, the issuance of any building or grading permits, or the submittal of a
map for this site, whichever may occur first. Provide and improve all drainage ways as
recommended.
FS
SDR-65423 [PRJ-65299]
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The request is for an 18,657 square-foot, three story office and restaurant building located at the
northeast corner of Charleston Boulevard and Art Way.
ISSUES
A Site Development Review is being requested for an 18,657 square-foot, three story office
and restaurant building. Staff recommends denial of this request.
The Downtown Centennial Plan does not require the automatic application of Title 19
parking standards; however, the 21 parking spaces proposed are not adequate for the
anticipated uses.
The site design is not consistent with the Urban Design Goals and Objectives highlighted in
Chapter III of the Downtown Centennial Plan.
A Waiver from the Downtown Centennial Plan streetscape standards has been requested
adjacent to Charleston Boulevard and Art Way. Staff recommends denial of this request.
The required Downtown Centennial Plan 42-inch decorative fence intended to screen the
parking lot from the right-of-way. A condition of approval has been added to ensure that this
standard is met.
ANALYSIS
The site is located within the 18b Arts District, the Las Vegas Redevelopment Area and the
Live/Work Overlay District and is in compliance with all applicable overlay regulations.
The building is located on the southern portion of the site, with the parking located immediately
to the north. Access is provided by one ingress/egress drive from Art Way and a right turn-only
egress drive from both Art Way and Casino Center Boulevard. There are 21 parking spaces
proposed for the overall site. Five of the available parking spaces are within the right-of-way,
and will require the approval of an encroachment agreement. Parking spaces in this area cannot
be counted towards the overall parking count of the site. While the Downtown Centennial Plan
allows for flexibility and does not require the automatic application of Title 19 parking
standards, the uses associated with this project would normally require 128 parking spaces (46
for Office and 86 for Restaurant) if the site were located outside the Downtown Centennial Plan
area. Staff does not support the amount of parking proposed, as the parking demand for high
traffic uses such as restaurants and lounges will overburden the available on-site parking.
FS
SDR-65423 [PRJ-65299]
The proposed site design is not consistent with the Downtown Centennial Plan Urban Design
Goals and Objectives. One of the stated land use goals of the Downtown Centennial Plan is to
create pedestrian-friendly uses on the ground floor of buildings. The proposed building consists
of ground level restaurant and office space that does have not access for pedestrians utilizing
Charleston Boulevard. The primary entrances to the building are located adjacent to the parking
area on the north side of the building. The ground floor uses should be readily accessible to
pedestrians on the street-front side of the building. The design is also contrary to the urban
design goals of the Downtown Centennial Plan, which states that buildings should be built to the
property line or sidewalk edge. The proposed building is instead set back several feet to allow
for landscaping, which further detaches the building from the pedestrian realm. The use of shade
devices have been provided on the Charleston Boulevard side of the building, but they provide
no shade for pedestrians as they are located directly above the proposed landscape areas.
Along Charleston Boulevard, the Downtown Centennial Plan requires a streetscape consisting of
a 10-foot sidewalk and a five-foot amenity zone planted with 36-inch box shade trees every 20
feet on-center. The landscape plan depicts a 10-foot sidewalk and a five-foot amenity zone
planted with 36-inch box African Sumacs along a portion of Charleston Boulevard. The
required street trees are not located along the edges of the Charleston Boulevard frontage nearing
the intersections of both Art Way and Casino Center Boulevard. In total, eight street trees are
being provided where 14 are required. Along Art Way, the Downtown Centennial Plan requires
a 10-foot sidewalk and a five-foot amenity zone planted with 36-inch box shade trees every 20
feet on-center. The landscape plan depicts a five-foot sidewalk with no amenity zone or street
trees along this street frontage. Along Casino Center Boulevard, the Downtown Centennial Plan
requires a streetscape consisting of a 10-foot sidewalk and a five-foot amenity zone, with 25-foot
tall palm trees spaced 30 feet on-center. The required streetscape improvements were installed
by the City along Casino Center Boulevard (CIP-16526) in the late 2000s and no further action is
required by the applicant.
The applicant has requested a waiver from Downtown Centennial Plan streetscape standards to
allow a reduction of required streetscape improvements along Art Way and for portions of
Charleston Boulevard. One of the primary goals of the Downtown Centennial Plan is to create
streetscapes that provide safety, comfort, and interest for pedestrians. The lack of amenities
along Art Way and the reduction of shade trees along Charleston Boulevard are not appropriate
for an area of Downtown that has high pedestrian activity. Priority should be given to providing
adequate pedestrian facilities for this site and adhering to the requirements of the Downtown
Centennial Plan. Staff recommends denial of the waiver request.
The parking lot landscaping plan depicts an adequate amount of trees and landscaping for the
amount of parking provided. The Downtown Centennial Plan requires one tree per six parking
spaces, which equates to four required trees. Also required is ten square feet of landscaping per
each space for a total of 200 square feet of required landscaping. The landscape plan shows a
total of four parking lot trees and landscape areas in excess of 200 square feet. Not shown on the
site plan is the required 42-inch decorative fence intended to screen the parking lot from the
right-of-way, and a condition of approval has been added to ensure compliance with this
requirement.
FS
SDR-65423 [PRJ-65299]
The building elevations depict a three story, multi-level building with a listed maximum building
height of 45 feet. The exterior faade consists of stucco, decorative panels, perforated metal, and
glazing. The goal of the Arts District is to encourage building design that contributes to the
quality of life in an active, aesthetically considered manner. The appearance of the building is
visually pleasing and is consistent with the aesthetic qualities of the Las Vegas Arts District.
The site occupies a prominent and highly visible location within the Arts District where the
minimum standards and goals of the Downtown Centennial Plan should be adhered to. As
currently designed, the proposal does not meet the intent of several Downtown Centennial Plan
Urban Design Goals and Objectives, including those outlined in the Land Use, Urban Form and
Pedestrian Environment subsections. The building is not built to the edge of sidewalk and has no
pedestrian entrances along Charleston Boulevard. The requested streetscape waiver along
Charleston Boulevard is not appropriate as the reduction of street trees reduces shade for
pedestrians and does not enhance the aesthetic qualities of the area. Along Art Way, the
proposed waiver eliminates the streetscape improvements altogether, resulting in a five-foot
sidewalk located at the back of curb with minimal separation from the travel lane. This area of
the Arts District is heavily populated with pedestrians and streetscape improvements should be
prioritized. While the Downtown Centennial Plan does not require the automatic application of
Title 19 parking standards, the uses associated with this project would normally require 132
spaces if the site were located outside the Downtown Centennial Plan area. With only 21
proposed spaces, the parking demand for high traffic uses such as restaurant and lounges can
overburden the available on-site and local on-street parking. Staff recommends denial of the Site
Development Plan Review and the requested waivers.
1.

The proposed uses are compatible with adjacent development and development in the area.
2.
The proposed development is not consistent with the Downtown Centennial Plan Urban
Design Goals and Objectives, and the mandated Downtown Centennial Plan streetscape
treatment is not being provided along Charleston Boulevard and Art Way.
3.

FS
SDR-65423 [PRJ-65299]
The site access does not negatively impact adjacent roadways or neighborhood traffic.
4.
The building materials are appropriate for the area and the City. The landscaping, where
not compromised by waiver requests, is also appropriate for the area and the City.
5.

The elevations indicate a building that is not obnoxious in appearance and is harmonious
and compatible with development in the area.
6.
general welfare.
general welfare through the process of permitting and inspections.
The City Council approved a Site Development Plan Review (SDR-5660) for
a 20-story mixed use development and a waiver of Downtown Centennial
02/16/05
Plan streetscape standards at the northwest corner of Charleston Boulevard
and Casino Center Boulevard.
Staff and the Planning Commission
(SDR-9888) for a proposed 540 foot tall, 47 story Mixed-Use Development
with 280 residential units and 5,540 square feet of retail with Waivers of
upper floor step back requirements, the building placement requirement, and
01/04/06
the Downtown Centennial Plan streetscape standards, a Special Use Permit
(SUP-9886) for a Mixed-Use Development, and a Special Use Permit (SUP9887) for a 540-foot tall building in the Airport Overlay Zone at the northwest
corner of Charleston Boulevard and Casino Center Boulevard. The Planning
The City Council approved a Vacation (VAC-11633) for a portion of Casino
Center between Charleston Boulevard and Coolidge Avenue and a Master
04/19/06
Plan of Streets and Highways Amendment (MSH-11632) for a realignment of
Casino Center and 3rd Street Connector. Staff and the Planning Commission
FS
SDR-65423 [PRJ-65299]

The City Council approved three Extension of Time requests (EOT-27786,
EOT-27787, EOT-27788) for a proposed 540 foot tall, 47 story Mixed-Use
Development with 280 residential units and 5,540 square feet of retail with
Waivers of upper floor step back requirements, the building placement
01/16/08
requirement, and the Downtown Centennial Plan streetscape standards, a
Special Use Permit (SUP-9886) for a Mixed-Use Development, and a Special
Use Permit (SUP- 9887) for a 540-foot tall building in the Airport Overlay
Zone at the northwest corner of Charleston Boulevard and Casino Center
Boulevard. The Planning Commission and staff recommended approval.
Department of Planning Staff administratively approved a Site Development
12/08/15
Plan Review (SDR-62485) for a 17-foot by 4-foot embellishment to an
existing Off-Premise Sign.

09/20/12
Issues discussed included the concern with the lack of parking for the
06/21/16
proposed uses, the requested streetscape waivers, possibility of additional
parking on the adjacent City owned land, and other application related items.
Field Check
06/30/16
There is an existing Off-Premise Sign on a portion of the site. The remainder

of the site is undeveloped.

Site Area
Net Acres
0.57
FS
SDR-65423 [PRJ-65299]
Surrounding
Property
Subject Property
Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12
Off-Premise Sign
North
Undeveloped
South
General Retail
East
Undeveloped
West
Restaurant/Tavern
and Parking Lot
Planned or Special
C (Commercial) and
MXU (Mixed Use) Las
Vegas Redevelopment
Plan Designation
MXU (Mixed Use) Las
Vegas Redevelopment
Plan Designation
C (Commercial) Las
Vegas Redevelopment
Plan Designation
C (Commercial) Las
Vegas Redevelopment
Plan Designation
MXU (Mixed Use) and
C (Commercial) Las
Vegas Redevelopment
Plan Designation

C-2 (Limited
Commercial)
C-2 (Limited
Commercial)
C-2 (Limited
Commercial)
C-2 (Limited
Commercial)
C-2 (Limited
Commercial)
Master Plan Areas

Compliance
N
Compliance
N
Y
Compliance
Trails
N/A
Y
N/A
N/A
The proposal is not in compliance with Downtown Centennial Plan streetscape standards and
Urban Design goals and objectives. There are no live/work units proposed with this application
and the proposal is in conformance with the Las Vegas Redevelopment Area.
FS
SDR-65423 [PRJ-65299]
Pursuant to the Downtown Centennial Plan, the following standards apply:
Standard
Required/Allowed
Provided
Compliance
Min. Lot Size
N/A
24,932 SF
Y
Min. Setbacks
N/A
Front
20 Feet
N/A
N/A
Corner (Art Way)
20 Feet
N/A
N/A
Corner (Casino Center)
12 Feet
N/A
N/A
120 Feet
N/A
Rear
Max. Lot Coverage
N/A
16 %
N/A
N/A
45 Feet
N/A
Screened,
Gated, w/
Trash Enclosure
Y
a Roof or Trellis
Trellis
Mech. Equipment
Screened
N/A
Y
A condition of approval has been included to ensure compliance with Downtown Centennial
plan mechanical equipment and trash enclosure screening requirements.
Street Name
Art Way
South Casino Center
Boulevard
East Charleston
Boulevard
Functional
Classification of
Street(s)
N/A
Governing Document
Major Collector
N/A
Planned Streets and
Highways Map
Primary Arterial
Planned Streets and

Highways Map
Required

36-inch box trees planted
20 feet on-center
Actual
Street Width
(Feet)
40 feet
Compliance
with Street
Section
Y
80 feet
100 feet
Provided
Compliance
A 5-foot sidewalk and
no amenity zone along
Art way; and 8 street
trees along Charleston
N
Boulevard where 14 are
required.
FS
SDR-65423 [PRJ-65299]

Provided
Compliance
Parking
Parking
Gross Floor
Use
Parking
Area
HandiHandiRatio
Regular
Regular
capped
capped
1 space
per 50 sf
3,667 sf of
of seating
seating area
area and
Restaurant
82
one space
1,465 sf of
per 200 sf
other areas
of other
areas
Office, other
1 per 300
13,525 sf
46
than listed
sf
128
N
124
4
20
1
N
Loading
10,000 to
18,657 sf
2
0
N
Spaces
29,000 sf
While the Downtown Centennial Plan allows for flexibility and does not require the automatic
application of Title 19 parking standards, the uses associated with this project would normally
require 46 parking spaces for the office use and 86 spaces for the restaurant use if the site were
located outside the Downtown Centennial Plan area. Staff does not support the amount of
parking proposed, as the demand of the anticipated uses will greatly exceed the capacity of the
onsite parking, resulting in the surrounding area being negatively impacted.
Waivers
Requirement
Downtown
Centennial Plan
Streetscape
standards
Request
To allow a five-foot sidewalk and
no amenity zone along Art Way
where a ten-foot sidewalk and fivefoot amenity zone is required; and
to allow 8 street trees along
Charleston Boulevard where 14 are
required.
Denial
FS
SDR-65423
SDR-65423
7*7
bA77
SDR-65423
A7b77A7A
7bA7
Ab
Ab
A
A
A7AbA
SDR-65423
A7
A7b77A7A
7bA7
77
77
77
7777777
7 7b7777777
A7777
7
7 77A7
7 777777A7
7 A7777
777
7 7
7777
777777
7A
777b
bA77
7A
A7AbA
777777
7 7b7777777
A7777
7
7 77A7
7 777777A7
7 A7777
777
7 7
7777
777777
7A
777b
bA77
7A
A7A
bA7b
bA
b
A7AbA
A
A

A7
A7b77A7A
7bA7
77#
SDR-65423
77
77
A77A
7
bA77
AbA7A
SDR-65423
A7b77A7A
7bA7
A7AbA
A77A
7
bA77
AbA7A
A7A
SDR-65423
A7b77A7A
7bA7
A7AbA
bA7b
bA
b
A
A

bA77
bb7A
b
A7A
A7A
7A
7A7b7
A7b77A7A
bA7A7
7A
7
7
A7AbA
Ab
7A
bA7A77A
A
A
777A
A
7Ab7AbA
7A77
A77A7
b7
7A
7A7
7A
7A
7
7bA7
SDR-65423
A
A7A
b7A
b7A
7
bb
A7A7b
7
bA77
bA77
bb7A
b
A7A
A7A
7A
7A
7b7
7
A7b77A7A
bA7A7
7A
7
7
A7AbA
Ab
7A
bA7A77A
A
A
777A
A
7Ab7AbA
7A77
A77A7
b7
7A
7A7
7A
7A
7
7bA7
SDR-65423
A
A7A
b7A
b7A
7
bb
A7A7b
7
bA77
bA77
bA7A7
7A
77
7A7b7
bA7A
A7b77A7A
A7AbA
A7A7b

bA7A7
7Ab7AbA
7A77
A77A7
b7
7bA7
SDR-65423
7
7A
77A
A7A7b
7
bA77
bA7A7
7A
7
7A77
bA7A
A7b77A7A
A7AbA
A7A7b

bA7A7
7Ab7AbA
7A77
A77A7
b7
7bA7
SDR-65423
77
7A
77A
A7A7b
7
bA77
7A b7
SDR-65423
A7b77A7A
7bA7
A7A7b
bA7A7
77
A7AbA
A7A7b
7
bA77
7A 7
SDR-65423
A7b77A7A
7bA7
A7A7b
bA7A7
77
A7AbA
A7A7b
7
bA77
A7A7b7
SDR-65423
A7b77A7A
7A7A
7bA7
bA7A7
7A7
bA7A7
A
7A
A

7
A7AbA
bA77
A7A77
SDR-65423
A7b77A7A
7A7A
7bA7
bA7A7
7A7
bA7A7
A
7A
A

7
A7AbA
7b
SDR-65423
A7b77A7A
7bA7
A7AbA
A7bA
SDR-65423
A7b77A7A
7bA7
A7AbA
77A77A
SDR-65423
A7b77A7A
7bA7
A7AbA
A7bA77
SDR-65423
A7b77A7A
7bA7
A7AbA
b7A7A7A
SDR-65423
A7b77A7A
7bA7
A7AbA
7AbA
SDR-65423
A7b77A7A
7bA7
A7AbA
7A
7bA7
77bA7A
77A777AbA
A7b77A7A

b
7bA7
SDR-65423
7
A7AbA
7bA7
77bA
A7
7A77
7b
bA77
77A
bA7A7
A7b77A7A
A7
7bA7
SDR-65423
A7
7bA
A7
A7
7
A7bbAb
7
A7bbAb
7b
bA7AA7
7
A7bbAb
7b
bA7AA7
7
A7bbAb
7b
b7AA
A7AbA
bA77
b7 7A

b
A77
A7b77A7A
A7
7bA7
A7
SDR-65423
A7
7
A
A7AbA
7
A7bbAb
7AA
7
A7bbAb
7b
7AA
b7
7
A7bbAb
7b
b7AA
bA77
77A
A7b77A7A
7bA7
SDR-65423
7
b
7
A7bbAb
7b
A7AbA
77A7A77A7b77b
A A
bAbA
bAbA7777b777
bA7A
bA77
A7 A
7b77bA7A
A7b77A7A
7
A7Ab
b7
A7Ab
7
A7Ab
7bA7
SDR-65423
A7
b7
7A
A7AbA
A7
77A
777
7 77777
77777
7777777
7777
A777777
777777
7B
Ab7 777
777
777
7b7
777
b7b7 b7
7
7
7b
7
b7
A7b7 A77
b7b7
7bAbA7 7b77b
77 7
7A7 77b7
7A7 7777b
Ab77
b7 b77777
7A
7A7b7AA
SDR-65423
A7b77A7A
7bA
7bA7 77777
A7AbA

AbA7 b77777777777777777
77
AbbA7AA7 7
7
77
777
A7A77
bA7A77
b7A77 77A
A77
A7b77
777777
7777b77
777777777b7
777777777777
77*777777*77777
777777
7
777777777
7
7777777777
A7AA7 7777
7
7777777777
7
7777777777
A7
7A77
77 77777
b7 77777777777777777B777777
777777A777777b7b777777
777777777A777777777
777777777777777
7777777A7777777777777
7777777777777777777777
77AA
Ab777
A777A77
A7A7A7b
77
A7b77A7A
7bA7
Ab7
A7A7Abb
7A7
bA7A77A7A7
SDR-65423
Ab77b77A7b
A7
7
7b
AA7A
A7AbA
A
77A7
A7b7A7
A7A77
7A7
bA7A777A7A7A
SDR 65423
1337 R E Group, LLC
NWC Charleston Boulevard & Casino Center Boulevard

Proposed 18.657 thousand square foot commercial building.
First Use
AM Peak Hour
11.01
GENERAL OFFICE BUILDING [1000 SF]
13.525
PM Peak Hour
1.55
1.49
149
21
20
Second Use
127.15

HIGH-TURNOVER (SIT-DWN)
RESTAURANT [1000 SF]
AM Peak Hour
5.132
PM Peak Hour
11.52
11.15
653
59
57
Total Use
AM Peak Hour
11.01
GENERAL OFFICE BUILDING [1000 SF]
PM Peak Hour
18.657
1.55
1.49
802
80
77

36,006
2,880

1,352
108


51,800
16,300
This project will add approximately 802 trips per day on Charleston Blvd. and Casino Center Blvd. Charleston is currently
at about 70 percent of capacity and Casino Center is at about 8 percent of capacity. After this project, Charleston is
expected to be at about 71 percent of capacity and Casino Center to be at about 13 percent of capacity.
Based on Peak Hour use, this development will add into the area roughly 80 additional cars, or about four every three
minutes.
SDR-65423 [PRJ-65299] SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - APPLICANT/OWNER: 1337 R E GROUP,

LLC
NORTHWEST CORNER OF CHARLESTON BOULEVARD AND CASINO CENTER BOULEVARD
06/30/16

LLC
06/30/16

LLC
06/30/16
SDR-65423
SDR-65423
SDR-65423
SDR-65423

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
Consent
Discussion
SUBJECT:
TXT-65639 - TEXT AMENDMENT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: CITY OF
LAS VEGAS - For possible action on a request to amend LVMC 19.12.070 related to the Night
Club use to amend the conditions under which the distance separation requirements may be
waived, and to provide for other related matters. Staff has NO RECOMMENDATION.
THIS ITEM WILL BE FORWARDED TO CITY COUNCIL IN ORDINANCE FORM
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff has NO RECOMMENDATION
1. Proposed Amendments and Staff Report
TXT-65639

DEPARTMENT:
PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: CITY OF LAS VEGAS
CASE
NUMBER
TXT-64667
RECOMMENDATION
REQUIRED FOR
APPROVAL
Staff has NO RECOMMENDATION.
** NOTIFICATION **
NOTICES MAILED
RJ Only
APPROVALS
PROTESTS
N/A
SG
TXT-65639
Proposed Amendments Page One
**PROPOSED AMENDMENTS**
1. Title 19.12.070 Permissible Use Descriptions and Applicable Conditions and Requirements is
hereby amended by amending Minimum Special Use Permit Requirement Number 6 of the
Night Club use:
6. The distance separation requirement set forth in Requirement 1 may be waived in
accordance with the provisions of LVMC 19.12.050(C) under the following
circumstances:
a. in connection with a proposed nightclub that will be located on a parcel within the CV District, the Parkway Center District within the Downtown Centennial Plan
Overlay District, the Office Core district within the Downtown Centennial Plan
Overlay District, the Gaming Enterprise Overlay District, the Fremont East
Entertainment District, the 18b Arts District or the Downtown Casino Overlay
District; or
b. in connection with a proposed nightclub that will be located within an establishment
which has a non-restricted gaming license and is not exempted pursuant to paragraph
5;
2. Title 19.12.070 Permissible Use Descriptions and Applicable Conditions and Requirements is
hereby amended by amending Minimum Special Use Permit Requirement Number 8 of the
Night Club use:
*8. No nightclub may be located within 500 feet of any single-family dwelling unless the
nightclub is located on a parcel adjacent to Las Vegas Boulevard between Charleston
Boulevard and Fremont Street;
i. that has a minimum net site area of 0.25 acres; and
ii. is within a building that has a minimum of 5,000 square feet of gross floor area
dedicated to the use.
SG
TXT-65639
July 12, 2016 - Planning Commission Meeting
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT SUMMARY
This is a request to amend LVMC Title 19.12.070 Permissible Use Descriptions and Applicable
Conditions and Requirements to add a condition to the Minimum Special Use Permit
Requirements under which a waiver of the distance separation requirements may be requested
for the Night Club use.
ANALYSIS
For a Night Club use, LVMC Title 19.12.070 establishes minimum special use permit
requirements, including minimum distance separation requirements of 1,500 feet from the
following protected uses: church/house of worship, school, individual care center licensed for
more than 12 children and City park. Under certain specific conditions, these requirements may
be waived at a public hearing in conjunction with the approval of a Special Use Permit when it is
determined that the proposed use will meet the conditions for requesting a waiver and at the
discretion of the City Council or the Planning Commission.
This amendment will add the Office Core District within the Downtown Centennial Overlay
District to the areas that a waiver of the minimum distance separation requirements may be
requested.
In addition, the Night Club use includes a non-waivable minimum Special Use Permit
Requirement that no nightclub may be located within 500 feet of the nearest single-family
dwelling. This amendment will waive this requirement for a nightclub located on a parcel of at
least 0.25 acres that is adjacent to Las Vegas Boulevard, between Charleston Boulevard and
Fremont Street, as long as the use is located within a building with a minimum of 5,000 square
feet of floor area dedicated to the Night Club use.
Staff has no recommendation regarding this amendment.
FINDINGS
The proposed text amendment will achieve the following:
SG
TXT-65639
Allow the City Council and the Planning Commission to consider a waiver of the
minimum distance separation requirements from an individual care facility (more than
12 children), church or house of worship, city park or a school for a Night Club located
within the Office Core District within the Downtown Centennial Plan Overlay District.
Allow a Night Club to be established within 500 feet of a single-family dwelling on
properties located adjacent to Las Vegas Boulevard between Charleston Boulevard and
Fremont Street that are at least 0.25 acres in size. The Night Club would be required to
occupy a building with a minimum of 5,000 square feet of gross floor area dedicated to
the use.
Allow some flexibility to permit additional locations for the Night Club use along the
Las Vegas Boulevard corridor where the use is not otherwise permitted due to the
minimum distance separation requirements. Currently, there is one church/house of
worship located at 300 South 7th Street and a number of existing single-family dwellings
along 7th Street (two blocks to the east of Las Vegas Boulevard) that prevent the
establishment of a new Night Club use along much of this stretch of Las Vegas
Boulevard.
SG

DIRECTOR:
TOM PERRIGO
SUBJECT:
CITIZENS PARTICIPATION: PUBLIC COMMENT DURING THIS PORTION OF THE
AGENDA MUST BE LIMITED TO MATTERS WITHIN THE JURISDICTION OF THE
PLANNING COMMISSION. NO SUBJECT MAY BE ACTED UPON BY THE PLANNING
COMMISSION UNLESS THAT SUBJECT IS ON THE AGENDA AND IS SCHEDULED
FOR ACTION. IF YOU WISH TO BE HEARD, COME TO THE PODIUM AND GIVE
YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD. THE AMOUNT OF DISCUSSION ON ANY SINGLE
SUBJECT, AS WELL AS THE AMOUNT OF TIME ANY SINGLE SPEAKER IS
ALLOWED, MAY BE LIMITED

08.09.16 SPECIAL PC FINAL PACKET - Items - 28-122 PDF

Diunggah oleh

Informasi Dokumen

Judul Asli

Hak Cipta

Format Tersedia

Bagikan dokumen Ini

Bagikan atau Tanam Dokumen

Opsi Berbagi

Apakah menurut Anda dokumen ini bermanfaat?

Apakah konten ini tidak pantas?

Hak Cipta:

Format Tersedia

08.09.16 SPECIAL PC FINAL PACKET - Items - 28-122 PDF

Diunggah oleh

Hak Cipta:

Format Tersedia

Agenda Item No.: 28.

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING

APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:

Planning Commission Mtg.

Planning Commission Mtg.

City Council Meeting

City Council Meeting

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING

Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc

Most Recent Change of Ownership

Related Building Permits/Business Licenses

Details of Application Request

Existing Land Use

Existing Zoning District

MXU (Mixed Use)

General Retail Store,

R-1 (Single Family

Master Plan Areas

SUP-65400 [PRJ-65341] SPECIAL USE PERMIT - APPLICANT: HITEX INC

- OWNER: RZMZ FAMILY,

SUP-65400 [PRJ-65341] SPECIAL USE PERMIT - APPLICANT: HITEX INC

- OWNER: RZMZ FAMILY,

Agenda Item No.: 29.

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING

APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:

Planning Commission Mtg.

Planning Commission Mtg.

City Council Meeting

City Council Meeting

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING

Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc

Most Recent Change of Ownership

Related Building Permits/Business Licenses

Details of Application Request

Existing Land Use

Existing Zoning District

MXU (Mixed Use)

R-1 (Single Family

MXU (Mixed Use)

MXU (Mixed Use)

Auto Repair Garage,

MXU (Mixed Use)

Master Plan Areas

Planned Streets and

Agenda Item No.: 30.

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING

APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:

Planning Commission Mtg.

Planning Commission Mtg.

City Council Meeting

City Council Meeting

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING

Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED

3. No temporary signs (as described in LVMC 19.14.090) such as balloons, inflated

Details of Application Request

Existing Land Use

Existing Zoning District

General Retail Store,