ENTREPRISE TUNISIENNE
DACTIVITES PETROLIERES
SEPARATOR
DESIGN & SIZING
Students:
Mohamed SAHNOUN
Yessin REBAI
Mahmoud MAKNI
I.
INTRODUCTION:
Separators play an important role in the oil and gas industry and are critical to the success of almost
all processes. The usage of phase separators ranges from functions as diverse as ensuring that final
product quality meets often stringent standards to protecting downstream equipment from undesirable
impurities. In the oil and gas industry the most common uses include:
Separation of liquid hydrocarbon from a hydrocarbon vapor (2-phase vapor liquid separation)
Separation of a two liquids differing in their respective densities (2-phase, liquid liquid separation)
Separation of a feed stream consisting of vapor, liquid hydrocarbon and water into 3 separate
components. (3-phase separation).
Whilst theoretically, it may be important to take into consideration dynamic operating conditions of the
separation process, such as variation in fluid properties with time; and the transient start-up and shutdown characteristics of separation operation when undertaking the design, this presents a near
impossible task in reality. As such, in this design we will uses steady-state operation of the separator as
its basis according to the GPSA Standards chapter 7.
II.
DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS
As is the case with the design of any vessel, the associated system properties and process requirements
must first be defined. In the case of separator design, these may include:
System Properties
Vapor Liquid
The vapor is the continuous light phase, with liquid being the heavy,
discontinuous phase which settles out as droplets.
HC liquid Water.
The HC liquid is the continuous phase, with water settling out as droplets
Water HC liquid
The water is the continuous, heavy phase, with HC liquid being the light
discontinuous phase rising up through the water as droplets.
Process Requirements
The required amount and composition of feed mixture to be purified will ultimately determine the
size and type of separator selected.
Degree of separation required. The minimum droplet sizes required to be separated from each phase
need to be specified. This is generally set by factors such as purity of product required for sale or
purity required to avoid upsets to downstream equipment / processes. For example:
In HC liquid vapor separation, efficient liquid separation from vapor is needed, particularly in
situations where the vapor subsequently flows downstream to a compressor. Separators for this
purpose often include mist eliminators to enhance their separation performance.
In water HC liquid separation, efficient separation of water from the HC is needed to avoid
over-loading downstream water treatment facilities. This is particularly important if the liquid
HC is then fed to a downstream distillation column.
III.
application, there are number of factors that need to be taken into consideration. The following sections
outline the general characteristics of both horizontal and vertical separators and where they are most
useful. It is important to note, however, there are exceptions to these recommendations and each specific
case should be evaluated before any decision is made.
For ease of reading, when comparing the performances of vertical and horizontal separators in this
section, the light phase will be referred to as vapor and the heavy phase as liquid, even in the case
of liquid-liquid systems.
A.
High separation efficiency due to higher vapor space volumes and vapor residence times.
Lower nozzle outlet elevations
More applicable for use as reflux accumulators, which can be more readily attached to and
supported by horizontal separators.
More suitable than vertical separators for handling large total liquid volumes.
May be used in applications requiring 3-phase separation.
B.
C.
Less potential for entrainment of liquid in vapor stream. Unlike a horizontal separator, the area
available for vapor flow is not reduced when the liquid level rises during operation.
Less footprint area required.
Easier installation and operation of level alarms and shutdown control systems.
Generally a lower cost option than horizontal separators.
More efficient than horizontal separators for high vapor / liquid ratios.
D.
Not generally recommended for three-phase separation unless the total liquid fraction present
in the feed stream is very low (10 20% by weight).
Less suitable for a feed with a high liquid/vapor ratio.
Based on the previous remarks, we chosen to design a horizontal separator.
IV.
Inputs Required
The following lists outline the input data required. Many such inputs are highly sensitive on
the precise process requirements of the separator, and include:
Physical properties of both phases Maximum flowrates
Actual Densities
Viscosities
B.
Separator Sizing:
INPUTS
Oil flow rate
Gas flow rate
Gas relative density
MW
Pressure
T
T
Z
Gas Viscosity
Liquid relative density
Dp
R
GOR
2 385,00
238 500,00
0,80
21,72
3 500,00
40,00
313,00
0,90
0,01
0,83
100,00
8,31
100,00
m3
m3/d
g/mol
kPa
C
K
cp
g/cm3
microns
m3/m3
1st step: Calculate the gas density to determine the gas flow rate, using the following equation:
Gas density
33,41
kg/m3
Liquid density
825,00
kg/m3
Mass flow
2,53
kg/s
Gas density
0,0757
kg/m3
The K factor is needed to calculate the critical or terminal gas velocity necessary for particles
of size D to drop or settle out of gas Vt through the next equation:
With an assumed diameter Dv= 1200mm, the length of the separator is about 2900mm.
Separator dimensions for gas liquid separation
D
1200
mm
L
2900
mm
Now, we will need to recalculate the dimensions with liquid/liquid separation equations.
Imputs
Oil flow rate
2385
m3
238,5
m3
0,825
1,01
Operation temperature
40
Oil viscsity
0,55
cp
C*
1880
Where:
Shl = relative density of heavy liquid
Sll = relative density of light liquid
Wcl= flow rate of light liquid, m3/day
Outputs
LlHl
3,77
4,969
m3
Regarding the values of U and HlLl, we can estimate the minimum diameter of the vessel:
=
= 1,4
Now we assume a value for Ll and figure out the corresponding height Hl:
Assumed Ll
4,8
Calculated Hl
0,8
The results of Dmin and Hl are acceptable (acceptable ratio between Hl and Dmin) so we will
compare them to those of the Gas/Liq separation and chose the right dimensions.
V.
CONCLUSION:
As a conclusion and after all this work, we obtain two designs of separator:
The first with a diameter D=1,2m and length L=2,9m for gas liquid separation
The second with diameter D=1,4m and a length L=4,8m for liquid liquid separation.
In order to get the best separation between gas/liquid and liquid/liquid, we have to choose the
biggest one which is the second design.