Abstract
The paper is dedicated to the
analysis and examination of
Tinder
from
innovation
management point of view. The
perspective adopted will define
how the topics encountered affect
the chosen innovation. First, the
essay will introduce the context of
the virtual dating before Tinder.
Then, the paper is going to
classify Tinder among the types of innovation explored and observe the
degree of expansion and diffusion in both economic and social contexts.
The study will investigate the source of the innovation, its origins and the
role of the users, how it spreads, the weight of the technological lockouts
and time of entry. Then there will be an analysis of Tinders business model
and its intellectual property rights.
Introduction
The technology has had huge impact on every aspect of our life, above all
how we interact with other people.
People began to use the WWW to find a partner since 1995 1. Today there
are both millions of websites and couples made up online.
The diffusion of smartphones has brought the ubiquity of connection to
1.75 billion devices owners starting the migration from online dating to
mobile dating.
After the first dating service on a mobile phone 2 and the expansion of
smartphones in 2007, the outbreak of the mobile dating apps took place.
Their portability and proximity features turned peoples daily life in a
social activity.
1 http://blog.badonlinedates.com/date-stories-jens-blog/2012/10/infographic-theevolution-of-online-dating.html
2 Proxidating was using the Bluetooth technology to connect mobile devices.
1
Dating is one of the aspect of our life the most suitable for becoming a
social activity. In fact, in 2013 7% of smartphone users had used a dating
app3.
One of the most innovative and lively dating app is Tinder 4 that, of course,
takes advantage of proximity and portability features that smartphones can
provide to the dating apps. A market valued at 1.4 billion in 20135.
Tinder is influencing and changing the entire process of dating, involving
the means, the tools, the processes, the feelings, the contexts and of course
the behaviours.
The curiosity for this app built in only 3 weeks and how it would face the
challenge to shift to a profitable business model arouse me deciding my
choice.
Definition types
Tinder is a product innovation, which according to the Oslo Manual
definition is a good or a service new or significantly improved by technical
specifications, component and materials or degree of user friendliness and
other functional characteristics6. The novelty or the changes to products
and services have to add value and benefits to the customer or meet the
market needs. Tinder does both since it combines new benefits to the
customers, that can avoid the fear of rejection and take advantage of
localization feature, with the market needs because people are
continuously seeking new way to connect each other and update their
behavioural habits with the new trends and technological tools.
Tinder is a service innovation, providing a new dating service that include a
link with Facebook - making the connections more reliable and more
comfortable because of the linkages among people who have common
friends and involving a game component - users can swipe each other
and the gathering of the matches has huge influence from a psychological
perspective. The dating service does not rely on shared interests and
hobbies anymore but it shifted to the mutual liking.
3 http://www.neomobile-blog.com/online-dating-evolution-infographic-neomobile/
4 http://www.gotinder.com/about
5 http://www.neomobile-blog.com/online-dating-evolution-infographic-neomobile/
6 the OECD Oslo Manual, 3rd edition (2005)
2
From the S-curve perspective, Tinder is in the phase where the early
adopter are beginning to
embrace those applications.
Moreover, customers are
comfortable
with
virtual
dating, they overcame the
initial phase when many
online dating services were
launched and now they have
diversified their needs served
by
new
emerging technologies. We
have not still seen the
achievement of a dominant design. We are still in the stage where people
are experimenting new virtual dating patterns and models.
Source of Innovation
Serendipity played an important role within the creation of the app. It is
likely the two founders did not know which was the direction they
undertook and the implications of what they created. While Rad and
Mateen were employed at Hatch Labs13, they were working on the idea of a
flirting app based on mutual liking system. They just wanted to overcome
some of the main typical drawbacks and fears of the offline date process
that occur to both male and female: feelings as disappointment and
embarrassment, uncomfortable situations (unwanted suitors and
consequent unfiltered requests, meetings and messages) or the habitual
uncertainty of identity of the virtual dating systems. Maybe Tinder
founders did not know what they would have cause but they knew what
they were addressing to: a market with several constrains that was looking
for who could provide a solution to its problem.
10 http://www.forbes.com/sites/stevenbertoni/2014/11/04/exclusive-sean-rad-out-astinder-ceo-inside-the-crazy-saga/3/
11 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bandwagon_effect
12 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2561518/Winters-unofficial-Olympic-sportSingle-U-S-athletes-admit-Tinder-turned-Sochi-dating-game.html
13 a New York-based incubator owned by the
IAC(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IAC/InterActiveCorp )
http://www.forbes.com/sites/stevenbertoni/2014/11/04/exclusive-sean-rad-out-astinder-ceo-inside-the-crazy-saga/2/
6
Standards battles
The technological lockout affects Tinder in two main dimensions. The first
one is the network effect, Tinder is certainly the type of innovation that
relies on the effect that the users of the service have on the value of that
service for the other users15. The app takes advantage of the two-sided
network that has two types of members, creating value each others
because the value of the network to one type of members depends on the
number of members of the other side. It entails that Tinder aims to be a
standard for dating but also for meet new people for many and varied
reasons. The bigger the number of Tinder users the more its value
increases and appeals the nonusers. The second dimension regards the
installed base. At the beginning, it could originate a technological lockout
since apps that relies on networks need large
installed base to function. The ease of usage, its user
friendly and the needs addressed fueled Tinder
installed base increasing it exponentially. Since its
simplicity and its free features, I cannot talk about
learning effect and switching cost. To conclude, from
a wider perspective the app could consider as
technological lockout complementary goods that can
be the mobile phone and the smartwatch. Indeed,
Tinder is a mobile app and it operates just on mobile
phone and smartwatches. The availability only on
those kinds of devices is both an advantage and a
drawback: it differentiates from the other services
making the experience more direct but limits the
usage excluding tablets and laptops.
Timing of entry
Since it is not the first dating service nor the first dating app neither the
first Facebook based mobile dating app, Tinder is not a First Mover but can
be defined fast second. It gathers the main features owned by the most
influential and disruptive apps - social discovery, gamification, location
and messaging - including those features in a service that changed the rules
of its market with its ease, user-friendly experience, reliability and level of
identification.
Business Model16
Customer Segment
Tinder focuses on mobile app users addressing the customer segment
called the mass market. In fact, there is no difference between customer
segments, offerings, distribution channels and level of profitability nor
willingness to pay for different aspect of the offer 17. The different customers
themselves perceive differently the features of Tinder depending on which
has more value for them. Even if it could be defined as a multisided
platform because the platforms value for a particular user group depends
substantially on the number of users on the platforms other sides18 there
are not two distinct groups of customers, associated value propositions
neither revenue streams. Tinder takes advantage of the two-sided network
and it has some features of the multisided platform pattern but the
distinction is not among customers but among the perception that the
customers has about Tinders features.
Value Propositions
Tinders value proposition makes its service unique. Increasing the speed
and frequency to whom people meet, users do not need to go in a bar they
can just start swiping and waiting for their matches. The mutual liking
system had a double effect, it has deleted the fear of rejection and
simultaneously it has solved many problem for high-pursued women as
unwanted suitors, unfiltered messages and meetings. It delivers you an ego
boost experience, since users are enabled to see the list of all their matches
knowing they have liked them. Moreover, through Facebook authentication
it provides the identity restriction that makes the app more reliable and
comfortable, the users know that the displayed Tinder profiles correspond
to real people who often belong to circle of Facebook friends that intersects
yours. Therefore, it adds the social and geographical proximity of the
possible matches because Tinder is a location-enabled app as well.
However, Tinders level of privacy is not affected by the interaction with
Facebook. In fact, only the First name, the age and a maximum of six pics
are showed as well as the social network will not share anything on your
behalf. Finally, Tinder provides a new way to meet people and simplify how
human court and approach.
Channels
Tinder reaches its users through different channels used to address the
Channel phases. The channels are the Apple Store, The Google Play and
Windows Store as well the webpage and blog. The apps stores with their
reviews and the Blog with its post raise the awareness among customers,
providing user generated experiences and app generated news. The
evaluation, purchase and delivery are essentially on the stores because the
content of the blog is app generated. The webpage performs its
functionality after sales since users can write to Tinder if they are looking
for any support.
Customer Relationship
Tinder has weak relationship with its customers because its value lies on
the linkages that it builds. The app listens to the customers to build
improvements and add new features providing them for all the necessary
means to communicate and get support. The Tinders customer
relationship is self-service19.
Revenue Stream
19 Business Model Generation. Osterwalder and Pigneur 2010. Pag. 29
10
average of cost of serving a free user and it is likely that the price they are
charging (probably 0,99 ) will increase the rate at which free users
convert to premium customers.
Key Resources
The Platform is the most important asset in the fremium business model,
allowing free basic service to be offered at low prices 24. Therefore, the app
stands for the main mean through Tinder delivers its value proposition the virtual place where users like or reject each other, matches and text.
Then, we have intellectual resources as the brand, worldly acknowledged
for the boost it brought in the human relationships. Finally, the customer
database that includes all the matches, lists, messages and data ongoing
evolving. In fact, the more we use Tinder the more the precision the
algorithm has - recording tastes and changes in interests and friends.
Human resources are necessary as well, the team and its perspective on the
goal and mission of Tinder had lead the app through a development that
tried to address to customer feedback and requirements. Moreover, the
initial decisions of the team shaped the evolution of the app, as the choice
to pilot it in the colleges or spread it among L.A. social influencer. Although
we are not in knowledge-intensive industry, as pharmaceutical or software
ones, the human resources owe their importance to the vision they bring to
the developing of the app. As Financial resources, we must mention the
IAC, which is still providing the necessary financial support it stands also
as a drawback since the founder owns just the 10% of the app. It would be
not feasible not quoting, Since Tinder is a mobile app and function only on
smartphones and smartwatch, the mobile network is a key resource
differentiating the service accelerating the meeting process.
Key Activities
The key activities regard the management of the platform and its
promotion as well as the provisioning of the service. Tinder has to manage
the platform where each users have to see possible matches based on user
preferences, location and interests. The algorithm improves its accuracy
progressively with the usage of the app, updating the possible matches
displayed with both new friends added on Facebook and in-app swipes and
rejects. Since the beginning, Tinder promoted its service and brand image
in an unconventional way. They started with the colleges in order to have
24 Business Model Generation. Osterwalder and Pigneur 2010. Pag. 102
12
Key partnerships
The first important key partnership affect one of the main functionality of
Tinder: the geographical proximity. The app display the users nearby you
and to make it available, Tinder had to agree on a partnership with Google
Map. Once Tinder shifted to the fremium business model, the
geolocalization increased its value since one of the two features, Passport,
uses the geolocalization to add value to the customer. Recently, Tinder
partnered with Amnesty International to make aware people of violence of
women26. Since the app was accused of sex discrimination, it helped to
rehab the image of the brand. Therefore, I can define such kind of
partnership that act on the perception that the customer has about the
brand key ones.
25 http://www.forbes.com/sites/jeffbercovici/2014/02/14/love-on-the-run-the-nextrevolution-in-online-dating/
26 http://www.amnesty.org.au/news/comments/34082/
13
Cost structure
The costs for Tinder are definitely value driven. The additional value of the
app is the service it provides, hence it cannot decrease any cost connected
with the value proposition. The highest costs are linked with the platform
management and development, Tinder has to guarantee simultaneously
the stream of possible matches updated with correspondent modifications.
Then Tinder has to bear costs that regards, its employees, the software
development and the cost related with the premium features. Besides,
there are also Google Map rights and storage costs for the data of each
customers and the expenditures for the promotion of the app.
IT
Storage
Informatio
n
Managing
Digital
Platform
Software
Mobile
Inventory
& Delivery
system
Algorithms
Google
Play, Apple
Store,
Windows
Store
Google
Maps
Software
Developme
nt
Tinder
webpage
and blog
Activities
with
Ongoing
Updating
of the
data
Maintena
nce and
Diagnosti
cs
systems
Promotion
of Service
14
Suppliers
value chain
Company
value chain
Channels
value chain
Google
Maps
Apple
Store
Facebo
ok
Google
Play
Google
Maps
Windo
ws
Apple
Customer
s value
chain
Mobile
App
Website
and Blog
15
Intellectual property
It seems Tinder did not patent its service. It is possible to find a patent
about an application for mobile phone, called Lasso27, that works with the
same principle of Tinder, Hot or Not. Two students filed the patent in
2005 before the beginning of the smartphone era. Currently, there are not
patents available on WIPO website nor on US patent office, neither patents
filed from Hatch Lab, the incubator where Tinder was born, or IAC, the
company that own both the incubator and Tinder. It is unknown how
Tinder is protecting its functionality of displaying the possible matches
through an order based on a score that depends on the social proximity on
Facebook. Instead, Tinder protects its Trademarks with US Trademark 28,
Australian Trademark29 respectively registered on 02/04/2014, and
04/11/2013 (in Australia it will be protected for 10 years). While in Canada,
its registration is still pending although it has been filed on 01/11/2013.
The owner of trademarks in US and Australia is Tinder, Inc. Corporation
and in Us Hatch Lab corporation as well.
27 http://www.google.com/patents/US20070037574
28 http://www.wipo.int/branddb/en/showData.jsp?qi=46551417967152980&ID=USTM.85980800&LANG=en&NO=1&TOT=3
29 http://www.wipo.int/branddb/en/showData.jsp?qi=46551417967152980&ID=AUTM.1589323&LANG=en&NO=0&TOT=3
16
References
bercovici, j. (2014). [online] Available at:
http://www.forbes.com/sites/jeffbercovici/2014/05/06/linkedin-for-love-tinder-for-businessand-other-off-label-technology-uses/ [Accessed 29 Nov. 2014].
bercovici, j. (2014). [online] Available at: http://www.forbes.com/sites/jeffbercovici/2014/04/11/notinder-is-not-worth-5-billion/ | No, Tinder Is Not Worth $5 Billion [Accessed 4 Dec. 2014].
bercovici, J. (2014). [online] Available at:
http://www.forbes.com/sites/jeffbercovici/2014/02/14/love-on-the-run-the-next-revolution-inonline-dating/ [Accessed 1 Dec. 2014].
Bertoni, S. (2014). [online] Available at:
http://www.forbes.com/sites/stevenbertoni/2014/11/04/exclusive-sean-rad-out-as-tinder-ceoinside-the-crazy-saga/ [Accessed 2 Dec. 2014].
Bmfiddle.com, (2014). Business Model Fiddle. [online] Available at:
https://bmfiddle.com/f/#/z4VX5 | z4VX5 - The Business Model Canvas - BMFiddle [Accessed
2 Dec. 2014].
colao, j. (2014). [online] Forbes. Available at: http://tinder-for-business-dating-app-looks-toconquer-other-matchmaking-verticals/ | Not Just For Hookups: Tinder Looks To Conquer
Business Networking - Forbes [Accessed 2 Dec. 2014].
CrunchBase, (2014). [online] Available at: http://www.crunchbase.com/organization/tinder/press
17
Rao, L. (2014). [online] Techcrunch. Available at: http://techcrunch.com/2014/06/05/with-momentstinder-too-decides-photos-shouldnt-always-last-forever/ [Accessed 2 Dec. 2014].
Schilling, M. (2014). [online] Available at: http://nraomrp.blogspot.fr/2012/11/technology-lockout-r
[Accessed 2 Dec. 2014].
Shontell, A. (2013). There Is Now A Socially Acceptable Way To Call Someone Ugly Or Attractive,
And It's Sweeping College Campuses. [online] Business Insider. Available at:
http://www.businessinsider.com/what-is-tinder-walk-through-2013-1?op=1 | What is Tinder?
Walk-through - Business Insider [Accessed 2 Dec. 2014].
Shontell, A. (2014). Tinder, A $500 Million Dating App, Used This Pitch Deck When It Was Just A
Tiny Startup. [online] Business Insider. Available at: http://www.businessinsider.com/tindersfirst-startup-pitch-deck-2014-7?op=1 | Tinder's First Startup Pitch Deck - Business Insider
[Accessed 1 Dec. 2014].
SHONTELL, A. (2014). [online] Available at: http://www.businessinsider.com/tinder-is-launchinga-premium-service-2014-10 [Accessed 3 Dec. 2014].
Smith, K. (2014). [online] Available at: http://www.businessinsider.com/tinder-dating-app-2013-1
[Accessed 1 Dec. 2014].
Tsotsis, A. (2014). [online] Available at: http://techcrunch.com/2013/11/21/tinder-wants-to-be-withyou-even-when-you-are-taken/ [Accessed 1 Dec. 2014].
Wikipedia, (2014). [online] Available at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tinder_%28application%29 |
Tinder (application) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia [Accessed 1 Dec. 2014].
Wipo.int, (2014). [online] Available at: http://www.wipo.int/branddb/en/showData.jsp?qi=46551417967152980&ID=AUTM.1589323&LANG=en&NO=0&TOT=3 [Accessed 4 Dec. 2014].
Wipo.int, (2014). [online] Available at: http://www.wipo.int/branddb/en/showData.jsp?qi=46551417967152980&ID=USTM.85980800&LANG=en&NO=1&TOT=3 [Accessed 4 Dec.
2014].
19