~--,-:
SPE 17824
FACTORS AFFECTING RESIDUAL OIL SATURATION AND ITS
DISTRIBUfiON IN A WATERWETIED TIGJIT RESERVOIR
DURING WATERfLOODING
.
re~~ervnit' und~r
ls
only
20-30~.
The pmount
nr
roi~b~
as
high
permeablllty reservoirs.
causes
of
~esenrch
to
the
2) the
granular~
litholoe~
r.ontt~nt
has
mojiW
sizes: 3) the reservoir pore throat sizes: nnd 4) the effective flu'l..
able pore volume. The four parameters are intf.r'rlependent, ench reflecting one
aspect of their relatlonsh!P to the residual oil. The
other~
l~esidual
re:;~L~lunl
oil. It is indicated
oi 1 saturation
ri~es
up ar. the
INTRODUCTION
.._.
.....
Vartou~~
stntistir.~: ..
tl~tn.l.
For
the
in their per-
Jiffen~nce
in the low
h~'drocarf.~Gn
thn~~e L'e!~er-voirs
Pt~l"'
having litt"le
IW
no water-sensi tl ve mlnernl such as montmori lloni te and illite; usuallY the met.hud
. l)f
.
water flooding iS adopted for their development. This not onlY can increase produc-tion lntensl ty but also can enhanca oil recovery feom the reservoir'. The maln problem for this method is low displacement efficiency -- much lower than that of the
high permeability sand reservoir. People have shown mope and more extensive concern
as to the reason for this Phenomenon and what arl-:a the controlling
factOl~s
of the
distribution of residual oll. It has much to do with how to make a more l'ationnl Jevelopment of the large portion of
resL~rve5
in the low
Pt~rmeobillty
reservoirs. r.f,:::tn-
efft::ctivt:~np~:~:
implemlmt~d, il
Pecovt:t'nblf~
rt-.!
core:::~ froth
1Lt~
serves.
.'-
lYSiS
._.
stati~~tic
lttholo~ic
r1nnlY:.~i:,
[.-,
(1ll.
FffiD DATA
'-
--2--
SEE 17 8 2 4
In order to
under~tanrl
welh~
perm,~nblll
pay
~urassic.
res~rvotrs
low permeabilitY
the
ln1'gL~
sandstone,
-3 1o
)Jill
No water-sensl ti ve minerals were identl fled in the rock analysl s.- After water flooding, the permeabilitY decreased by 1'31: (the water volumP. injected was 200 times
sreate~
than the pore volume). After the study of sedimentnry rock hi stor'Y and the
reservoir
formations.
permeability;
~:,Part
fiS
or
flint) content was formed ... Due to the high hardness. the compactlon
during the inunature stage of the miJdle matured rock. The reductton
intersranular
COillPlexl ty
space was
mainly resulted
or
wrs~~
smnll
its prilllnt'Y
of the distribution of the pore thtouts wn~~- rormed when the intepgranulm'
space was further occupled bY the erow1ng quartz, ht!nce the PhYsical property of low
permeabilitY was aggravated. Another cause
or
various tYPP.S of
feld~~pat'
tht~
l!~
ns hiSh as
30-40~
Comong
them. the content of lower' class fle::ihle mftnmorphic JeLr-is and sericiti:cd ftLi
~
spar
8t1 Cilll!:~e
~~erious
b~
obser'ved
vt~ry obviou~:
thrc.~ugh tlu~
from the
~:ulJ~;ur
face feldspar dissolution and kaolinizution is the low per-meabi 11 ty pore thr-ord
--3--
SPE
17 8 2 4
Im~
low porositY caused by the cementation durin-~ the diuS8nettc process; 2) Hiilhl:t
"'
rm~med
The Pi lot production in Changqlng o.i lfleld showed that the mak-e-up ener-gy roc the
reservoir was rather weak. During the elastic drive phasP.. production and
pre~~~~ur~t~
was much improved. The oi 1 product ion per well per daY
and the recovery rate w.ere raist?d greatly. After the Pilot production war.
irregular inverted 9Gspot pattern w\th tlae
~~:11 ~~pnctng
or
t)
-:.
wells/km,
fini~~hed,
wa~~ appllt~rl
in the overall water flooding development of the oilfield. However, the nmount of
the liquid production tncreased wns rnther 1imi teJ, the effectt veness of .vate' tlri.ve
was rather low. As a result, once thet'e was wnter' production, tt was very d.lfficnlt
tomaintain stable production. In ot'der to 11nJerstunct the influence on residunl tH l
in the low permeability reservoir .. 8 data
of water breakthrough. 5 out of the
fl
hol~r.
the studies. They were Llngjian-214, LinSjlan-236, Zhongjtan-9, WanSjlan-40 rtnd Lee.jlan-t 9. Cores
'.t~ere
-J
overall average permeability was 32.2 10 Am CTab le 11. In order to obtain reliable data, large rllameter COPing c-core dinmetets 140mm1 wet'e applied. Tn t)rder to
avotd the influence of the dri l1inS mud,
r.hemlcah~ Jr~,~e
dr~i
lllm;.
and the tracing test was used to conftrm l:lte ~~ontnminnt ion of cores bY the dr- i 11 ins
mud. Only those unconto.mlnated cores were se] ected. Tn the process of sett tng the
cores to the gro11nd and cuttuis them and Plitt inS them into bottles ror examlnat.ton
there was loss in both water and oi 1 saturntion.
TiliS
--4--
SPE
1 7.8 2 4
------ -
......
--
--
desa~:sine
dw~
to
cut"'i.~
tr~ave 11 i ng
'.\las
tj tht! ail'
t~:-:pusurt~
from d1)wnhc. le
befotl~
was put into the sealing fluid. "In otder tl). have. n prrLct u:al est ilnn.te or
the
of such loss. mttch field wot'k and laborcJtory tests we['e 11ndertaken .. Cuttt ne.
grading analysis, mercury fi llins . : -
. - ~ nnd
~:cr:nn i ng
L<:Lf!
:~ l ic in~~.
electron-microsr.oij:.
analysis were made wtth the core samples to fjcqnire thH relntiortshiP bet'Nt~en tht!
residual oil and lithology. In order to determine whether the snmples Leing
nnut:f:t~d
n.t~
was
ust~J
to cnlcu1nte
Jll
and water production in the formations where the cot'es rfime from. llnlY the c:ol"'e fre:u,
water producing zones were
consider~:J
as
r~sidual
re:::~ i dual
~~aturation
oi 1 saturation.
INFLUENCE Of LITHOLOGY
conc~pt
of resldunl oi 1 ratio
"l./1
the
original oil saturation of the sample is introduced. The current otl saturation at
reservoir condl tlon is obtained tht"'ough
d~gassing
the oil saturation of the sample. Obviously, the displacement e-fficiency shoultl be
1
-y.
Analysis and study show that the residual oil rntio after water flooding
1~1
1. The influence of the content of medium flne s&nd and silt in the rock
di~~tribution
rocks. E.xaminations of the samples shuwrd that sranulat'l ty was one of the
important factors affecting the level of t"'esidual oil rnt1o. 29 pteces of cme
sample!: were SP.lected to obtain datn. 111 regmJ h.1
re~adual
~ranular!
ty.
--5SPE
17 8 2 4
.._.
Common sradinS stanciards wer'e nppl ted: mPdium snnd: o. s - n.2rinnn: nne
'-
~~on.t:
0.. 25
o.tmm: silt: 0.1 - O.Otmm. From FlSure 1 we can see thot there is a rather goorl sta-
. '-
re~:idual
y '"'
i.
0.. 0052 ~ .
0.3515
percenta~e
(1)
content (:;;)
t~
n~~
increase of resldunl all ratio. Therefore, when the fine sand nnd silt cont.t:nt
1f' - 0.0105
where
X~
ls sll t per"r.:entase
inflw~nre
~:i
1t ppn
dll'.
mmt~:~e,.l:
(()
Xz + O.SSnJ
content
of
c~:)
~~i
Jt content
hn~~
un outstanding
i nf1llt.~m - LC:
2. The
lnflUI~nc&
We have just
discw:~sr.d
\..,..
~;i
lt
percentage on
re~~ i dunl
,hml oi 1 ratio
ill~ ce~~i
the~ rr~~~illunl
0;:-:t-~: tht~
SI'Itir, :i:r-
t'F:~aduul
~Wain
oi 1 ratio.
pt:~rc.t:~tl '~k
sl:e
lji
.srow~;
~~i~:e.
Tt ::: cltr,rl::
clines.
3. The influence
or
Cllre sample~;
to hi"
--(.-"-
SPE
17 8 2 4
residual oil samples. Through calculat1ons based on the duta obtuined rrom tht! 237
wn~~
drnwn to
~:how
the residual oil ratio and the pore tlwout.ruJius Ci11 micron). From figure 3 we can
see that the resldual oi 1 ratio reriuces as the pore thront radius
tl}e displaceme~t efficiency
lnrget'; 1. e.
get~~
smaller radius indicates that for water flooding ln the low per~meabili ty reservoirs,.
lt is difficult to displace the oil in thu small thuH1ts. tl&us the residual oil rallo
(3)
efficiency~
1 ..
0.3555ro....UJ
0. t 594
C4)
Equation C4) is the statlstlcnl equation r.howtng the relationshiP between thP displacement efficiency and the pore throut rad i U!~
meablllty reservoir ls ended. It
i~.:
ij
~Ni th
~~~r-
i11wnys
the value of the pore throat radius r is not difficult tu set. the displact=-ment r"ffi
ciency can be easilY .calculated wtth Equntit)n C4). nernuse 1( rP.presents
tht~
rrttiiJ
bet'lleen the residual oil saturation S0r and the oric!inal oil saturation S01' , ,-.tif'HI'Hd-
ly the
.._.
re~idual
.._.
b~ ~.~::pre~;:..~P.d
Ot'i~inal
"'_,
11f d
r,::
servoir are known. the residual oi 1 saturation cnn be calculated With Equatiun r:.
4. Tile influence of effect l ve flowable
port~
volume on thP.
r-~ levnnt
r"t~~:i
dual oil
lftboratory duta, n
uwv~
sLnw i r~~~
--(--
SPE
178 24
cur~~c
Is
i ~: nnte\orthY
tt
multi -sr:ction
brol.t~n
lint
or n,l
"0", the
cor~re~~pondine
pore throat
ohser~ed ft'ljffi
sectlon~~
f'[Ldlus i~:
wtthin the
h}lt as
re~idun1
ot 1 ratio is
a~qn~.
It
mean~~
that for this type of pore throat .. even if wt th water flood.tng, the otl contni ned
. __..
is difficult to flow, thus this type of pore throats are called difficult to flow
pore throat .. Its percentage can be observed by the corr-e~:('ponJtng percentage
of cumulative mercury filled in the ordinate in Fie. 4 and
'-'
r~ecorded
fi5tii"P.
as V". Ve
represents the perce~tage of no1nblr. met"rur'Y out nf the total rtmo11nt of the
merr.ury filled.
In this way, a new parameter m\l 5 is introduced representlnS effective flownble
....
p~re volumP..
nt
value of flowub le oi 1 in the pnre thronts. ';!hen fi s. S is drawn, we can see that
there is a very good relationshiP between mV& and 'f
'-
iS
'f
re~~er-
voir is closely t'elated wt th the mV5 value. That pteans, when water floodi 11S is imP lemented in a low permeability reservotr, the
di~~placement
ctive flowable pore throats. It is di ffi cult to recover the oi 1 in those small pol'es
in which oil is contained but unable to flow out.
--
We have analysed the factors affect inS the residual ot 1 in terms or the flne sand
and silt percentage content, silt percentage content, granular slze, pore throat
size nnd e-rfecttve flownble pore volume. TI1e four llthologtc pat"ameters are re-
--8--
SPE
178 24
-._.
other~.
fi11e
effect! ve flowable pore volume decrenses. Th i :~ shows thnt the incr'f.ment of tht:'
fin~
rP
;~mallP.r'
nlSL) thr~
duct ton of effective flowable pore volume due to smaller pore tlu'out:.:.
The rock sranular sizes also have direct
voli1me CFig. 7). When the roc:k sranular
iltfll.n~ncP.
~~ize
void~~
l>nLt_'
nr1d
pore thl"oats are increusetH the flowable ~pace provided by the rock. also becontt~~~
01 l
ObvitHt~~lY~
effect.ivt.~
i!~
dtmm,
ok~et'Ved.
We have analysed the i.nf]uence of r-eservoir' ror.k r.hnrac teri st i,CS on thf!
re:~ i
dual
oil and havn wr 1t ten out stat 1st1 cal e}:pressions fot' each parameter. nused on thnt ~
.._.
multiple
regre~slon
tlonshiP between the residual oil r-ratio and these fiVP. lithologic
'-'
the
- 0.159 1sr
li ty water -wet
9. 91
x. 1o-+ ;.:;
3. 907
l(
1n-~ :-:t,
n.326 lg~
re~~ervoi r.
--.
~: tmul atlon
factor::~
COl't'8~pond1ng
--9-SPE
17 8 2 4
--- ------- .
..
"'-
Analy~ is
lm:~m"
~~irnulatinn
pro-
than GO
:<.
.. )
'1.
water
percentage is apparently hi8her than thP. absorbed oil percentage; tlte r'esut. . voir. .
i~:
..
water-wet. When the permeability is higher than 60 >< tO J_pm.
the reservolr
'-
of
the~e
i~:
characteristics.
In his research of a water-wet oi 1 and water systf.mp Lund gave the re 1at lon~:h i p
...
Cdilllt'I1SloulP.ss) 50 ;
-----.a
s .
01
C is "entrapping constant"', i
r no
~~tr~ons. fn1'
thP.
i~
convenienr:i~
of
description, we put:
\.:...
A=----
._.
Wben A is big,
t~~ere
~ntrapping
(lJ")
capacity
n~~;ul
t i lltJ
l~quations
th~
--1n--_.
SPE
178 24
50,
and
SDi
'K~ith
th8
followin~ equat1or1:.:~
sor -~------
(9)
s. = - - - - -
C10)
,_.
1 - S wtfl
where
s....
.....
'llf: finLl 1s
that
I~~ strongt!r
capillary effect
in the smaller pore throat radius reservoirs CF.ts. 8). That means, smuller por'e
._.
._.
throat radius has stronger capillary fot'ce. Fis. 8 showr. that A value slope is
steep when the pore throat radl u~
rndlus
--..
entrapping furce
for'c~
h~
mainly
existS) tn
CiiP i
11 r1r'/
eventually lfmds to the rir.e uf residu.al oil snturation CFig. 9). f1jr u wntd-
'-
~~eparatlon
i~~olatrld
is separated iHt1) a
dL~(Lj(Jti
tt! ht~
'-
di~placeJ
"-
,_
t!Vt.~ntllctlly
Oi ]
p~rmenbi li ty
WP.
~~~f
.._.
--11
.SEE 17 8 2 4
----
... _..
.. -. -. ----- -
gravl t/'
t~
re:~itlunl
oi 1 r ~tio value
brtJtt~~ht
tiuwn by
'~
small as
....
1-2~.
tr.~~:idual
ui 1 rntio
dr-op~~
duwn
f.L SUiilt)
f1)['
oi.l
only
o.ax. Thus we can see that capillary entrapping force PluYs a dominant role in
tht~
CONCLUSIONS
\. ..
1) For the low permeablll ty water-wet reservotrs,. the residual oi 1 formed undt:r
the condition of water flooding development is closely related to the characteri-
'-.
parameter~,
[~eservoir
~ilt percentu~P.
exprL~ssed
ns such
CI)Utent.
them~
the effective flowable pore volume. A detailed descriPtion of the quantitative rela,_.
tlonshlP between these parameters and the residual oi 1 ratio ls g1 ven with the dutn
obtatned from the cor'e samples.
\.._._.,
2) Theoretical annlysis in this arttcle concludes that the poor water drive Pffert.
cau~:r:d b~'
"-
nnd largf.: residunl oil saturation in thP. luw pP.rtnef1bilitY reservoir'S are
the :=:mall pore throat and the cnptllatY Ant:capping force. Therefore, how to reduce
cnpillary entruppinS force is ull
impur~unt ~:ubj~r.t
residual oll.
ha~~
no
lc~w
apparent inflttenre on
tht)
'-
BIBLIOGRAPHY
"-
--12-,_
SPE 1 7 8 2 4
.......,.
...
(1) Han On
f~mm~h!lunn
Oil and \linter Movement in the Heteroserwot1~: 01 eo phi ll c Snndstone Reservo ir::p.
n,i.
(i.r t tt
ploration and
Dt-~velopment Re~~etwch
Institute Cin
Pnpet~s
nf
Primnr~~ Mineral~;
rJf
Chan8~'ling Pr.l.r'oh~l.llll
th,.:~
r.::
Odnt:::~:t~~
.._
........
'-
--tJ-SPE 1 7 8 2/t
!..
Qj
f./1
,-.
u
---
guiUUll'JS
--
~I TO aA IJP JalUM
- - ..
.0...,
~r~
II])
..
. '6.
oJ
""'
t
oJ
"t
ti
't'
""
Oo
(J,
"("'
.....
"()
.;:\-
.....
...,..
"'C"
,.,
""
.:to
.....
o-
....
I~
(,
....
~ ....
....
;\
--4
~ a-.
"' <ro
'Z!
'
~i
~ ~
Qo..
'
...
~I,, ..,::.. .,.. ~~
~.
I
i
I I
I-:~~~
r
I
'
I
-r
Q,
......
r..
.... 1
-41
,...
~
11
1'\
...0
"
.:J.
0..
""'
"
""'
-4
J~~~
.......
......
!....,
CCI
IWI~ul
-4
\...,
Ql
"(
1---
..... 1"'4
1't-
* :::
""'! ':-
~~
- -1,, ....~I
......
,).
.:}..
..... .....
""....
-.....
--4
I
.....
'
"
..:t
::I
'
)..
(tj
~I-
:r"' .
QO
....,
"
....J
I.])
QJ
.-4
.....
~
.....,
/'
I t
'
"'
r,..
I.
..:.
~ ~
,,
"'"t
......
r-
0'
..,.i
~::~jF:S ..... ~
...
....
-~~-- ~ ......,.,
~ -~
....U--4-J
...,.. ,..
~~-:
3:
)-
-:! Q-1~
.....:.' ~... ""~ "'ll't: . .
GIQ
(, r::- ~
..:..
"f'
"f
~ -~
,.:..
..c
~a-
.....,
IQ
c::
.... ~ ~ ~
'l.
..a
-(\
r1
'. .
~~.,.. ~ --I~
>-i ;: ):. - ,....,
IrS
i-4'~
.-ij ~
o-
"Qt)
.::
~:
"i ~ ~~ * ~J.
"''
....,
lt:l
-.
--1
::::. ,.....
' : I :!14
I -. ~j- ~ .. I~I i,~~~1'-1
!I -i.jo-~ c.;
ao.
~
~-1 ~. ".1 ' .......
i aol ~~ ~ ...... "4
!'I~,... N "'I I ....
""'I I "1- ~ N ..:;... ... ~ ~
I 'I
i
II
rI c:
~ >-
Q!
.. 4
.....
!
..:..
t..:.
j.
.,.,
""
Ia!)
OQ
t...
....~". ~
~d
- ..
L....
<lJ
. -t-1
......
a3
*'
-
'
'Q
..,
q:.
"""
~~
"
.,
,"Q
....,-.
-...I
'riO
.-
,...-
ao Q Q ~
">- ~ ):. }::.
,..,
, ..Q...
..,J
..i.
-.J
--
uon:JasUT4l
... _SUT-lS'2J
,_
I])
tj
: ..
......
0
ssau~J T4:t
. ='
.q. lJni-ntmJ!l
..
~ palliJ . m:J-Jaw- -
til
(d
1.11
-ffi
..0
lt:S
.-1
'tAO
c
........
-t-~+.J
~...-
~-i1.
Qjl
31:'
-
aJoJ
ssamp144UOTllllUJO.:l
I'J
.:: -a
'-
.
~
,q, Il 1f.}UaWJa(i r
.uon.ewJo.:l {
.......
-~~
.I
'I
..i
aJ
::;;&
SEE 17 8 2 4
.. __ Table .2
:
Permea.Pi li ty
rnnee --
L.
( 1o-~ _.,l,Lhl~ )
Av.era~E: . per:-
rto--J
menblll ty )
~ 1'1\~
- ...
Poros i tyc.%)
. Absor.b.ed
10- in~
1.!
. '-J. a
:?. 7
ir: ~
. i7. 2
a-;
IJ'?
;3. o8'
?f"
.l ..
"
.2
/ 4-o()
t~o-?oo
Ja6
Absorbed
otl(x)
'
.l.'
. .2.~
waferCx)
..
1- 4-
{t-.
r.., .
JJj
2"- a
~<:>
?.
l,'-
,7
~.~~
.2- -
='
r',
--------
-----
Residual oi 1 rntioC~)
90 .
---------- ....
)(
3 1~().(
)(
+->
"'J
'-
80
1,-
J .._.,/
~-'
' 70.
60
50
40
j
~0
Fig.
contentc~~)
.X
-~
60
8~0 .
RelationshiP between residual otl ratio
and flne snnd and si 1t content
120!
50-
~o.:l
...
SPE 1 7 8 2 4
----- ------------------
,...,
~ 1.0.
-0
.f:... o.si,
0
..
. .
-6
tJ.i
Cll
..
0.6i
0.4,
..
0.2/
01
2:
Fig. 3
4i
s:
10
12:
14,
16
,-..
.. '
~~ 99
"0
Q.)
-r::
:::: 80
ct-.
fl\
50
30
1],)
:>
~
......
~
0.1
.3 4 5 6 7
125 i 62 . 31 . 16 7.8
M 9
2.0
]() : ll 12 13 14 15
0.5
0.1~ ---- 0.04 t/l
Porr~
Fi~~. 4
throat
dtameter~c;-m)
mercury fi 11edC~)
SPE
17 8 2 4
Restdual oil
~atlo
0.9
:0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
i6
; 10
1-1
12
fjs. 5
I
10
Fig. 6
20 , 30
40
50
60
~llt
70
HU . 90 __ 1UO .
SPE
178 2 4
------. _
..... o
-----------
....
r,
"' 1~
= 16'
11)
::I
r-1
::>
QJ
c...
0
1-t
j,':l..
I]J
r-4
12
~
~
10
r-1
L&-
Q.)
:::-
Q)
,._.
~-
LIJ
""
0.1
FlS. 7
0.2
".olume and
st~ain ~:lze
median
<
:>.. -.
co
c.
co
'0.)
c::
rhythmi c oi 1 formtttiCII
'-4 type rhythmic oi 1 formnlic~n
: 1.5
o \)
~"0
tyr~e
..:=
QJ
1.0
f.
..
0.5~-------+-~------~----------------~------~--_J
0
riS. 8
Relation~hiP
10
SPE
17 8 2 4
-----------
~ 0.75
'""'
Normal
. .
. 0.4
flg. q .
0.8
1.2
I
. entru.pping capacity A
SPE
178 2 4