Scribd Logo
Unggah

Selamat datang di Scribd!

  • Alecia Farley v. Bank of America, N.A., 4th Cir. (2015)

    Diunggah oleh

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 tayangan2 halaman
    This document summarizes an unpublished decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal by Alecia and Marvin Farley of a district court order ruling on several pretrial motions in their case against Bank of America entities. The appeals court found that the district court's order was not a final judgment and did not fall into the limited categories of appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. Therefore, the appeals court dismissed the Farleys' appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

    Deskripsi Asli:

    Filed: 2015-03-04 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-2215

    Hak Cipta

    © Public Domain

    Format Tersedia

    PDF atau baca online dari Scribd

    Apakah menurut Anda dokumen ini bermanfaat?

    Apakah konten ini tidak pantas?

    Laporkan Dokumen Ini
    This document summarizes an unpublished decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal by Alecia and Marvin Farley of a district court order ruling on several pretrial motions in their case against Bank of America entities. The appeals court found that the district court's order was not a final judgment and did not fall into the limited categories of appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. Therefore, the appeals court dismissed the Farleys' appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

    Hak Cipta:

    Public Domain
    Unduh sebagai PDF atau baca online dari Scribd
    Tandai sebagai konten tidak pantas
    4 tayangan2 halaman

    Alecia Farley v. Bank of America, N.A., 4th Cir. (2015)

    Diunggah oleh

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes an unpublished decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal by Alecia and Marvin Farley of a district court order ruling on several pretrial motions in their case against Bank of America entities. The appeals court found that the district court's order was not a final judgment and did not fall into the limited categories of appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. Therefore, the appeals court dismissed the Farleys' appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

    Hak Cipta:

    Public Domain
    Unduh sebagai PDF atau baca online dari Scribd
    Tandai sebagai konten tidak pantas
    dari 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 14-2215

    ALECIA Y. FARLEY; MARVIN A. FARLEY,


    Plaintiffs - Appellants,
    v.
    BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.; BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., as Successor
    by Merger to BAC Home Loans Servicing, L.P.,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond.
    James R. Spencer, Senior
    District Judge. (3:14-cv-00568-JRS)

    Submitted:

    February 18, 2015

    Decided:

    March 4, 2015

    Before NIEMEYER and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Alecia Y. Farley; Marvin A. Farley, Appellants Pro Se. Michael


    T. Hosmer, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina, for
    Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Alecia Y. Farley and Marvin A. Farley seek to appeal the
    district

    courts

    order

    ruling

    on

    several

    pretrial

    motions.

    This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28


    U.S.C. 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral
    orders, 28 U.S.C. 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v.
    Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949).

    The

    order the Farleys seek to appeal is neither a final order nor an


    appealable interlocutory or collateral order.
    dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
    oral

    argument

    adequately

    because

    presented

    in

    the
    the

    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    Accordingly, we
    We dispense with
    contentions
    this

    court

    are
    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    Anda mungkin juga menyukai