Chennai - 020
EMBA/ MBA
Elective: Quality Systems Management (Part - 1)
components
and
know
that
almost
all
will
be
acceptable.
The diagram on the left shows a series of sample distributions that fall inside
of and outside of the specification limit. This is an example of an unstable,
not capable process. The right side of the diagram shows all of the
distributions falling within the specification limits. This is an example of a
capable process.
Process capability can be expressed with an index. Assuming that the mean
of the process is centered on the target value, the process capability index Cp
can be used. Cp is a simple process capability index that relates the
allowable spread of the spec limits (spec range or the difference between the
upper spec limit, USL, and the lower specification limit, LSL) to the
measure of the actual, or natural, variation of the process, represented by 6
sigma, where sigma is the estimated process standard deviation.
If the process is in statistical control, via "normal" SPC charts, and the
process mean is centered on the target, then Cp can be calculated as follows:
Cp = (USL - LSL) / 6 sigma
Cp<1 means the process variation exceeds specification, and a significant
number of defects are being made.
Cp=1 means that the process is just meeting specifications. A minimum of .
3% defects will be made and more if the process is not centered.
Cp>1 means that the process variation is less than the specification,
however, defects might be made if the process is not centered on the target
value.
While Cp relates the spread of the process relative to the specification width,
it does not address how well the process average, X, is centered to the target
value. Cp is often referred to as process "potential".
Cpk measures not only the process variation with respect to allowable
specifications, it also considers the location of the process average.
Cpk is taken as the smaller of either Cpl or Cpu
Cpl = (X -LSL) / 3 sigma where X is the process mean
Cpu = (USL - X ) / 3 sigma where X is the process mean
Many companies are establishing specific process capability targets. They
may typically start with 1.33 for supplier qualification and have an expected
goal of 2.0. If the process is near normal and in statistical control, Cpk can
be used to estimate the expected percent of defective material.
===============================================
Performance:
Performance refers to a product's primary operating characteristics. This
dimension of quality involves measurable attributes; brands can usually be
ranked objectively on individual aspects of performance.
Features:
Features are additional characteristics that enhance the appeal of the product
or service to the user.
Reliability:
Reliability is the likelihood that a product will not fail within a specific time
period. This is a key element for users who need the product to work without
fail.
Conformance:
Conformance is the precision with which the product or service meets the
specified standards.
Durability:
Durability measures the length of a products life. When the product can be
repaired, estimating durability is more complicated. The item will be used
until it is no longer economical to operate it. This happens when the repair
rate and the associated costs increase significantly.
Serviceability:
Serviceability is the speed with which the product can be put into service
when it breaks down, as well as the competence and the behavior of the
serviceperson.
Aesthetics:
Aesthetics is the subjective dimension indicating the kind of response a user
has to a product. It represents the individuals personal preference.
Perceived Quality:
Perceived Quality is the quality attributed to a good or service based on
indirect measures.
Dimension 1: Performance
Does the product or service do what it is supposed to do, within its defined
tolerances?
Performance is often a source of contention between customers and
suppliers, particularly when deliverables are not adequately defined within
specifications.
The performance of a product often influences profitability or reputation of
the end-user. As such, many contracts or specifications include damages
related to inadequate performance. This dimension of quality involves
Dimension 3: Reliability
This dimension reflects the probability of a product malfunctioning or
failing within a specified time period. Among the most common measures of
reliability are the mean time to first failure, the mean time between failures,
and the failure rate per unit time. Reliability normally becomes more
important to consumers as downtime and maintenance become more
expensive. Reliable equipment can mean the difference between a good year
and spoiled crops. But consumers in other markets are more attuned than
ever to product reliability.
Will the product consistently perform within specifications?
Reliability may be closely related to performance. For instance, a product
specification may define parameters for up-time, or acceptable failure rates.
Reliability is a major contributor to brand or company image, and is
considered a fundamental dimension of quality by most end-users.
Dimension 4: Conformance
A related dimension of quality is conformance, or the degree to which a
products design and operating characteristics meet established standards.
All products and services involve specifications of some sort. When new
designs or models are developed, dimensions are set for parts and purity
standards for materials.
One drawback of this approach is the problem of tolerance stack-up: when
two or more parts are to be fit together, the size of their tolerances often
determines how well they will match. Should one part fall at a lower limit of
its specification, and a matching part at its upper limit, a tight fit is unlikely.
Even if the parts are rated acceptable initially, the link between them is likely
to wear more quickly than one made from parts whose dimensions have
been centered more exactly.
Does the product or service conform to the specification?
If its developed based on a performance specification, does it perform as
specified? If its developed based on a design specification, does it possess
all of the features defined?
Dimension 5: Durability
A measure of product life, durability has both economic and technical
dimensions. Technically, durability can be defined as the amount of use one
gets from a product before it deteriorates. After so many hours of use, the
filament of a light bulb burns up and the bulb must be replaced.
Durability, then, may be defined as the amount of use one gets from a
product before it breaks down and replacement is preferable to continued
repair.
This approach to durability has two important implications. First, it suggests
that durability and reliability are closely linked. Second, this approach
implies that durability figures should be interpreted with care. An increase in
product life may not be the result of technical improvements or the use of
longer-lived materials. Rather, the underlying economic environment simply
may have changed.
How long will the product perform or last, and under what conditions?
Durability is closely related to warranty. Requirements for product durability
are often included within procurement contracts and specifications.
For instance, fighter aircraft procured to operate from aircraft carriers
include design criteria intended to improve their durability in the demanding
naval environment.
Dimension 6: Serviceability
A sixth dimension of quality is serviceability, or the speed, courtesy,
competence, and ease of repair. Consumers are concerned not only about a
product breaking down but also about the time before service is restored, the
timeliness with which service appointments are kept, the nature of dealings
with service personnel, and the frequency with which service calls or repairs
fail to correct outstanding problems. In those cases where problems are not
immediately resolved and complaints are filed, a companys complainthandling procedures are also likely to affect customers ultimate evaluation
of product and service quality.
Is the product relatively easy to maintain and repair?
As end users become more focused on Total Cost of Ownership than simple
procurement costs, serviceability (as well as reliability) is becoming an
increasingly important dimension of quality and criteria for product
selection.
Dimension 7: Aesthetics
The final two dimensions of quality are the most subjective. Aesthetics
how a product looks, feels, sounds, tastes, or smellsis clearly a matter of
personal judgment and a reflection of individual preference. Nevertheless,
there appear to be some patterns in consumers rankings of products on the
basis of taste.
The aesthetics dimension differs from subjective criteria pertaining to
performancethe quiet car engine, sayin that aesthetic choices are not
nearly universal. Not all people prefer rich and full flavor or even agree on
what it means. Companies therefore have to search for a niche. On this
dimension of quality, it is impossible to please everyone.
The way a product looks is important to end-users. The aesthetic properties
of a product contribute to a companys or brands identity. Faults or defects
in a product that diminish its aesthetic properties, even those that do not
reduce or alter other dimensions of quality, are often cause for rejection.
Dimension 8: Perception
Consumers do not always have complete information about a products or
services attributes; indirect measures may be their only basis for comparing
brands. A products durability, for example, can seldom be observed directly;
it usually must be inferred from various tangible and intangible aspects of
the product. Reputation is the primary stuff of perceived quality. Its power
comes from an unstated analogy: that the quality of products today is similar
to the quality of products yesterday, or the quality of goods in a new product
line is similar to the quality of a companys established products.
Perception is reality. The product or service may possess adequate or even
superior dimensions of quality, but still fall victim to negative customer or
public perceptions.
This completes the list of the eight dimensions of quality. The most
traditional notionsconformance and reliabilityremain important, but
they are subsumed within a broader strategic framework. A companys first
challenge is to use this framework to explore the opportunities it has to
distinguish its products from another companys wares.
A company need not pursue all eight dimensions simultaneously. In fact, that
is seldom possible unless it intends to charge unreasonably high prices.
Technological limitations may impose a further constraint. In some cases, a
product or service can be improved in one dimension of quality only if it
becomes worse in another.
the product or service. Secondly, they are the set of measurable variables
and/or attributes which comprise the specification that the organization uses
to assess its production capability and to ensure that the specifications are
met. Careful market research and clear product offerings help to ensure that
these two perspectives are identical. There are two types of product quality
characteristics, variables, and attributes. Variables are those quality
characteristics that can be measured on a continuous scale, for example,
length or weight. Attributes are those characteristics that are either present or
absent, for example, acceptable or not acceptable, within tolerance or out of
tolerance. Most operations texts explain in some detail how variables and
attributes can be measured using statistical process control (SPC) and
statistical quality control (SQC). Few, however, provide comprehensive lists
of product quality characteristics in the same way as service quality
characteristics.
The Product & Process Design pillar of the CQE Body of Knowledge is the
critical first step in delivering a high quality product that will satisfy your
customers.
Delivering a high quality product starts with capturing your customers needs
and then translating those needs into Products Features, which are also
known as Quality Characteristics.
Your Quality Characteristics are the features about your product that deliver
the functional performance that your customers need, want and are willing to
pay for.
These are the features about your product that your customers find valuable.
The best way to translate your customers needs into product features is the
use of the Quality Function Deployment tool (House of Quality).
In the framework of evaluating grammar checkers we suggest the following
specializations of the qualitative characteristics, based on ISO 9126:
Functionality:
It is a degree to which the equipment performs its intended function. The
way the system responds to errors is critical in this characteristic. This is
highly important for clinical equipments where minor error could be
disastrous. The system should detect errors and specify what they are,
thereby enabling the user to correct them. The system should not specify
non-errors. The system should be able to handle combinations of errors to
some extent. The present study focuses on this characteristic, since this is the
one that has to do with NLP.
Usability:
The user interface should have a form that makes the system easy and
efficient to use, e.g.
Dialogue;
Windows-based;
Text replacement;
Marked-up copy.
Reliability:
It is the capability of the product or service to perform as intended under
normal conditions without unexpected failure.
The system should not crash or loop;
The system should always specify the same grammar error in the same
context the same way.
This characteristic will not be tested explicitly.
In addition to the characteristics proposed by ISO 9126, we suggest:
Customisability:
The system should allow the user a certain control over the functionality.
The service provided should be complete and include the entire scope of
services. For example completeness of a training session.
======================================================