No. 13-4813
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville. Timothy M. Cain, District Judge.
(6:13-cr-00271-TMC-1)
Submitted:
Decided:
PER CURIAM:
Yeedser Daniel Palacios appeals his seventy-five month
sentence
imposed
following
his
guilty
plea
to
aggravated
On
appeal,
Palacios
argues
that
his
sentence
is
abuse-of-discretion
standard.
significant
procedural
Gall
v.
United
including
improper
18
U.S.C.
3553(a)
(2012)
factors,
and
failure
to
United
United States v.
Johnson, 587 F.3d 625, 639 (4th Cir. 2009) (internal quotation
marks
omitted).
lengthy
but
must
The
be
explanation
adequate
to
2
need
permit
not
be
elaborate
meaningful
or
appellate
review.
States
v.
Lynn,
592
F.3d
572,
576
(4th
Cir.
or
prosecutor
presents
nonfrivolous
2010)
Where the
reasons
for
marks omitted).
Palacios
primarily
asserts
that
the
district
court
adequately
explaining
why
it
rejected
his
arguments
He further
raise
in
the
district
court
his
arguments
Palacios did
regarding
the
in
selecting
sentence,
specifically
tying
the
selecting
regarding
family
his
well-developed,
experience
took
as
also
he
his
the
did
sentence.
were
not
not
Palacios
particularly
demonstrate
circumstances
outside
arguments
strong
how
his
the
heartland
or
familys
of
she
provided
no
evidence
atypical).
that
her
circumstances
were
give
specific
reasons
for
rejecting
his
requests
for
relief
is
warranted.
Insofar
as
Palacios
challenges
the
and
the
court
cannot
grant
the
district
court
any
effectual
relief
Further, it is apparent
meaningfully
considered
Palacios
We
dispense
contentions
with
are
oral
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
facts
and
the
materials
legal
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED