September 1, 2010
Decided:
PER CURIAM:
Gary
David
Lambert
appeals
the
district
courts
Lambert
district
court
to
order
restitution
to
any
victim
of
Thus,
18 U.S.C. 3613(a),
any
exemption
seeks
Lambert
other
to
Federal
law.
invoke,
28
3613(a).
U.S.C.
The
3014,
is
MVRAs
language
is
clear
and
unambiguous;
its
provisions
notwithstanding
statutes.
of
any
clause
other
section.).
supersedes
The
conflicting
MVRAs
federal
1047 (9th Cir. 2007) (en banc) (MVRA provisions supersede the
non-alienation provisions of ERISA); United States v. Irving,
452 F.3d 110, 126 (2d Cir. 2006) (same).
In light of the MVRAs broad language, including its
clear
intention
to
override
conflicting
federal
law,
the
of
federal,
state,
district
court
entitled
to
whether
or
local
correctly
garnish
all
the
tribal
law
under
concluded
of
28
that
Lamberts
3
ordinance
U.S.C.
the
property
constitutes
3014,
the
Government
was
or
rights
to
under
the
Internal
we
Revenue
Code,
and
the
3014
the
district
courts
orders
Lamberts
motion
to
quash.
We
dispense
with
oral
AFFIRMED