Anda di halaman 1dari 71

Case 2:16-cv-02980-DSF-AFM Document 30 Filed 07/29/16 Page 1 of 29 Page ID #:338

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

BEVERLY HILLS

TROJAN LAW OFFICES

11

R. Joseph Trojan, CA Bar No. 137,067


trojan@trojanlawoffices.com
Dylan C. Dang, CA Bar No. 223,455
dang@trojanlawoffices.com
Hee Jae J. Yoon CA Bar No. 298,925
yoon@trojanlawoffices.com
TROJAN LAW OFFICES
9250 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 325
Beverly Hills, CA 90212
Telephone: 310-777-8399
Facsimile: 310-691-1086
Attorneys for Plaintiffs,
CAPBRAN HOLDINGS, LLC and
NUTRIBULLET, LLC

12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

13

FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

14

WESTERN DIVISION

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

CAPBRAN HOLDINGS, LLC, a


CASE NO. 2:16-cv-02980-DSF(AFMx)
California LLC, and NUTRIBULLET,
LLC, a California LLC,
AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR
DAMAGES AND INJUNCTIVE
Plaintiffs,
RELIEF FOR FEDERAL
TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT,
v.
TRADE DRESS INFRINGEMENT,
COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT,
FIREMALL LLC, a New York LLC, DESIGN PATENT INFRINGEMENT,
and MITCHEL BERKOWITZ, an
and CALIFORNIA UNFAIR
individual,
COMPETITION
Defendants.

DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

25
26
27
28
CAPBRAN HOLDINGS, LLC, et al. v. FIREMALL LLC, et al.
AMENDED COMPLAINT

Case 2:16-cv-02980-DSF-AFM Document 30 Filed 07/29/16 Page 2 of 29 Page ID #:339

1
2

Plaintiffs Capbran Holdings, LLC and NutriBullet, LLC (hereinafter


collectively, Capbran or Plaintiffs) hereby complain and allege as follows:
I. PARTIES:

3
4

existing under the laws of the State of California, having its principal place of

business at 11601 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 2300, Los Angeles, California 90025.
2.

NutriBullet, LLC is a limited liability company organized and existing

under the laws of the State of California, having its principal place of business at

11601 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 2300, Los Angeles, California 90025.

10
11
12

BEVERLY HILLS

Capbran Holdings, LLC is a limited liability company organized and

TROJAN LAW OFFICES

1.

3.

Capbran Holdings, LLC is the licensor and Nutribullet, LLC is the

licensee and they share common ownership.


4.

On information and belief, Defendant Firemall LLC (hereinafter

13

Firemall) is a company organized under the laws of the State of New York,

14

having its principal place of business at 92 Union Road, Spring Valley, New York,

15

10977.

16
17

5.

Berkowitz), is an individual residing in the state of New York.


II. JURISDICTION AND VENUE:

18
19

On information and belief, Defendant Mitchel Berkowitz (hereinafter

6.

This Court has personal jurisdiction over Firemall because Firemall

20

conducts business in this district and has sold products to consumers within this

21

district.

22

information and belief, Berkowitz authorized and directed Firemalls sales of

23

infringing products, including sales within this district as alleged below.

24

7.

This Court has personal jurisdiction over Berkowitz because, on

Venue is proper within this jurisdiction because, on information and

25

belief, sales of accused products have occurred in Los Angeles, and because the

26

Plaintiff is located within the Central District of California at 11601 Wilshire Blvd,

27

23rd Floor, Los Angeles, California 90025.

28

-1CAPBRAN HOLDINGS, LLC, et al. v. FIREMALL LLC, et al.


AMENDED COMPLAINT

Case 2:16-cv-02980-DSF-AFM Document 30 Filed 07/29/16 Page 3 of 29 Page ID #:340

8.

1331 because this case arises under federal law, namely the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C.

1051 et seq., federal copyright laws, 17 U.S.C. 100 et seq., and under United

States patent law, 35 U.S.C. 100 et seq.

jurisdiction over the state law claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1367 because the state

law claim arises under the same set of facts as the federal law claims. Subject

matter jurisdiction is also proper in this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1332 because

there is complete diversity and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000.

BEVERLY HILLS

10

This Court has supplemental

III. GENERAL ALLEGATIONS:

TROJAN LAW OFFICES

Subject matter jurisdiction is proper in this Court pursuant 28 U.S.C.

9.

Capbran through its licensees has spent several hundred million

11

dollars advertising its BULLET blenders. Infomercials for the MAGIC BULLET

12

and related MAGIC BULLET blenders are shown somewhere in the world at every

13

minute of every day. The family of BULLET blenders includes inter alia, the

14

MAGIC BULLET, the BABY BULLET, the PARTY BULLET, the BULLET

15

EXPRESS, the MAGIC BULLET PLATINUM PRO, the NUTRIBULLET,

16

NUTRIBULLET SPORT, and the NUTRIBULLET PRO. The superior quality of

17

the BULLET product line in combination with extensive marketing efforts has

18

caused the BULLET blenders to become famous in the minds of relevant

19

consumers.

20

10.

Capbran Holdings, LLC is the owner of registered United States

21

trademarks for MAGIC BULLET, Registration No. 2,947,492, and MAGIC

22

BULLET, a stylized word mark, Registration No. 2,947,494, both in International

23

Class 007 for electronic appliances, namely kitchen food processors.

24

11.

Capbran Holdings, LLC is the owner of registered United States

25

trademarks NUTRI BULLET, Registration No. 4,161,917, NUTRIBULLET,

26

Registration No. 4,889,548, and NUTRIBULLET, a stylized word mark,

27

Registration No. 4,316,614, in international class 007 for electronic appliances,

28

-2CAPBRAN HOLDINGS, LLC, et al. v. FIREMALL LLC, et al.


AMENDED COMPLAINT

Case 2:16-cv-02980-DSF-AFM Document 30 Filed 07/29/16 Page 4 of 29 Page ID #:341

namely electronic food blenders.


12.

2
3

trademark NUTRIBULLET PRO, Registration No. 4,526,464, in international class

007 for electronic appliances, namely electronic food blenders.


13.

BEVERLY HILLS

Capbran Holdings, LLC is the owner of registered United States

trademark, Registration No. 4,416,702, a design mark, for its trade dress for blender

base which has a rim with a wave design. Attached hereto as Exhibit 1 are true and

correct copies of the registration certificates for the trademarks and trade dress at

issue.

10

TROJAN LAW OFFICES

Capbran Holdings, LLC is also the owner of registered United States

14.

Attached hereto as Exhibit 2 is a true and correct copy of trademark

11

assignment cover sheet for recordation of the assignment to Capbran Holdings,

12

LLC filed with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office showing Capbran Holdings,

13

LLCs ownership interest in the trademarks and trade dress at issue.

14

15.

Capbran Holdings, LLC also owns United States Copyright

15

Registrations for its retail boxes for NUTRIBULLET PRO and included user guides

16

and recipe books. Capbran Holdings, LLC is the owner of Copyright Registration

17

VA 1-968-778 for the NUTRIBULLET PRO retail box, Copyright Registration VA

18

1-841-670 for the Pocket Nutritionist book, and Copyright Registration TX 7-557-

19

487 for the Nutribullet User Guide and Recipe book.

20

16.

Capbran Holdings, LLC is also the owner of United States Design

21

Patent No. D554,427 for combined blender base and container, which is for

22

ornamental design of a combined blender base and container generally in the shape

23

of a bullet with a wave design on the bottom portion of the blender base, U.S.

24

Design Patent No. D500,633, and U.S. Design Patent No. D532,255 for ornamental

25

design for mugs. Attached hereto as Exhibit 3 is a true and correct copy of U.S.

26

Design Patent No. D554,427, D500,633, and D532,255.

27
28

17.

Firemall sold blenders under the designation MAGIC BULLET


-3CAPBRAN HOLDINGS, LLC, et al. v. FIREMALL LLC, et al.
AMENDED COMPLAINT

Case 2:16-cv-02980-DSF-AFM Document 30 Filed 07/29/16 Page 5 of 29 Page ID #:342

NUTRIBULLET

(NUTRIBULLET PRO 900) on Amazon.com.

3
4
5

BEVERLY HILLS

900

SERIES

BLENDER/MIXER

SYSTEM

On information and belief, Berkowitz directed and authorized

Firemalls sales of the counterfeit products.


19.

Plaintiffs have received numerous consumer complaints about the

defective or non-functional NutriBullet Pro blenders sold by Firemall. Plaintiffs

requested proof of purchase of the NutriBullet Pro blenders. Attached hereto as

Exhibit 4 are sample proofs of purchase submitted by customers who purchased the

NUTRIBULLET PRO 900 through Amazon.com from Firemall.

10

TROJAN LAW OFFICES

18.

PRO

20.

To process the customers warranty claims, Capbran requested that the

11

clients confirm that the product came with a Pocket Nutritionist Booklet, User

12

Guide & Recipe Book, and Quick Start Guide. The customers confirmed that

13

the product they purchased from Firemall contained the included product

14

documentations. Capbran also requested that the customer submit photos of the

15

front and back of the Pocket Nutritionist Booklet and photos the products Power

16

Base.

17

21.

The photos submitted by the consumers show that the labels affixed to

18

the bottom of the NUTRIBULLET PRO 900 sold by Firemall contain several

19

factual errors, such as the wrong name and model number. The label is also

20

missing certain information found on authentic NUTRIBULLET PRO 900 products

21

sold by Capbran. Thus, the products sold by Firemall are counterfeit products and

22

not the authentic NUTRIBULLET PRO 900 manufactured and distributed by

23

Capbran.

24

IV. FIRST COUNT:

25

INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. TRADEMARK REG. NO. 2,947,492

26
27
28

22.

Plaintiffs Capbran incorporate by reference each and every allegation

contained in paragraphs 1 through 21 above as though fully set forth herein.


-4CAPBRAN HOLDINGS, LLC, et al. v. FIREMALL LLC, et al.
AMENDED COMPLAINT

Case 2:16-cv-02980-DSF-AFM Document 30 Filed 07/29/16 Page 6 of 29 Page ID #:343

sold

products

designated

as

MAGIC

BULLET

NUTRIBULLET PRO 900 SERIES BLENDER/MIXER SYSTEM even though the

products were not an authentic NUTRIBULLET PRO 900 product manufactured

and distributed by Plaintiff.

NUTRIBULLET word marks in marketing the counterfeit product by its

designation

BLENDER/MIXER SYSTEM. The product packaging clearly used a reproduction

of the MAGIC BULLET logo mark, NUTRIBULLET logo mark and word mark.

In fact, the boxes were reproductions of the authentic NUTRIBULLET PRO retail

11

BEVERLY HILLS

Firemall

10

TROJAN LAW OFFICES

23.

of

MAGIC

Firemall used the MAGIC BULLET and

BULLET

NUTRIBULLET

PRO

900

SERIES

boxes used by Plaintiff.


24.

On information and belief, Berkowitz directed and authorized

12

Firemalls sales of the counterfeit products, including counterfeit trademarks even

13

though Berkowitz knew that the products were not authentic. On information and

14

belief, Berkowitz knew that the products were not obtained through Plaintiffs

15

authorized distribution channels but still directed Firemall to sell the infringing

16

products.

17

25.

The use of counterfeit retail packaging and counterfeit booklets,

18

including counterfeit trademarks on the packaging and booklets, is likely to cause

19

confusion and deception as to the source of Firemalls counterfeit products. In fact,

20

it did cause some consumer deception because consumers contacted Plaintiffs

21

regarding defective counterfeit products sold by Defendant Firemall.

22

26.

On information and belief, Firemall knew that the products it was

23

selling as NUTRIBULLET PRO 900 was not authentic but a counterfeit. And

24

despite the fact that it knew that it did not purchase any NUTRIBULLET PRO 900

25

from Plaintiff or its authorized distributors, Firemall willfully, deliberately and

26

knowingly offered for sale counterfeit products as authentic NUTRIBULLET PRO

27

900 products, constituting trademark infringement and counterfeiting in violation of

28

-5CAPBRAN HOLDINGS, LLC, et al. v. FIREMALL LLC, et al.


AMENDED COMPLAINT

Case 2:16-cv-02980-DSF-AFM Document 30 Filed 07/29/16 Page 7 of 29 Page ID #:344

1
2

On information and belief, Firemall has sold its counterfeit products

for less than Plaintiffs retail price, stealing sales of Plaintiffs authentic products

by selling defective and/or lower quality counterfeit products causing loss of profits

to be determined according to proof.


28.

Firemalls intentional and willful conduct has damaged Plaintiffs

reputation and goodwill because Firemalls counterfeit products are of lower

quality and/or defective. In fact, Plaintiffs had to respond to consumer complaints

about defective counterfeit products sold by Firemall.

10

BEVERLY HILLS

27.

TROJAN LAW OFFICES

15 U.S.C. 1114(a).

29.

In the alternative, pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1117(c)(1), Firemalls

11

infringement of the MAGIC BULLET, word mark, registration no. 2,947,492, by

12

its sales of counterfeit products including counterfeit marks entitles Plaintiffs

13

statutory damages up to $200,000. Firemalls intentional, deliberate, and willful

14

sales of the counterfeit products entitles Plaintiffs to enhanced damages up to

15

$2,000,000 per counterfeit mark pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1117(c)(2).

16

V. SECOND COUNT:

17

INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. TRADEMARK REG. NO. 2,947,494

18
19
20

30.

Plaintiffs Capbran incorporate by reference each and every allegation

contained in paragraphs 1 through 29 above as though fully set forth herein.


31.

Firemall

sold

products

designated

as

MAGIC

BULLET

21

NUTRIBULLET PRO 900 SERIES BLENDER/MIXER SYSTEM even though the

22

products were not an authentic NUTRIBULLET PRO 900 product manufactured

23

and distributed by Plaintiff.

24

NUTRIBULLET word marks in marketing the counterfeit product by its

25

designation

26

BLENDER/MIXER SYSTEM. The product packaging clearly used a reproduction

27

of the MAGIC BULLET logo mark, NUTRIBULLET logo mark and word mark.

28

of

MAGIC

Firemall used the MAGIC BULLET and

BULLET

NUTRIBULLET

PRO

-6CAPBRAN HOLDINGS, LLC, et al. v. FIREMALL LLC, et al.


AMENDED COMPLAINT

900

SERIES

Case 2:16-cv-02980-DSF-AFM Document 30 Filed 07/29/16 Page 8 of 29 Page ID #:345

In fact, the boxes were reproductions of the authentic NUTRIBULLET PRO retail

boxes used by Plaintiff.

BEVERLY HILLS

TROJAN LAW OFFICES

32.

On information and belief, Berkowitz directed and authorized

Firemalls sales of the counterfeit products, including counterfeit trademarks even

though Berkowitz knew that the products were not authentic. On information and

belief, Berkowitz knew that the products were not obtained through Plaintiffs

authorized distribution channels but still directed Firemall to sell the infringing

products.

33.

The use of counterfeit retail packaging and counterfeit booklets,

10

including counterfeit trademarks on the packaging and booklets, is likely to cause

11

confusion and deception as to the source of Firemalls counterfeit products. In fact,

12

it did cause some consumer deception because consumers contacted Plaintiffs

13

regarding defective counterfeit products sold by Defendant Firemall.

14

34.

On information and belief, Firemall knew that the products it was

15

selling as NUTRIBULLET PRO 900 was not authentic but a counterfeit. And

16

despite the fact that it knew that it did not purchase any NUTRIBULLET PRO 900

17

from Plaintiff or its authorized distributors, Firemall willfully, deliberately and

18

knowingly offered for sale counterfeit products as authentic NUTRIBULLET PRO

19

900 products, constituting trademark infringement and counterfeiting in violation of

20

15 U.S.C. 1114(a).

21

35.

On information and belief, Firemall has sold its counterfeit products

22

for less than Plaintiffs retail price, stealing sales of Plaintiffs authentic products

23

by selling defective and/or lower quality counterfeit products causing loss of profits

24

to be determined according to proof.

25

36.

Firemalls intentional and willful conduct has damaged Plaintiffs

26

reputation and goodwill because Firemalls counterfeit products are of lower

27

quality and/or defective. In fact, Plaintiffs had to respond to consumer complaints

28

-7CAPBRAN HOLDINGS, LLC, et al. v. FIREMALL LLC, et al.


AMENDED COMPLAINT

Case 2:16-cv-02980-DSF-AFM Document 30 Filed 07/29/16 Page 9 of 29 Page ID #:346

1
2

In the alternative, pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1117(c)(1), Firemalls

infringement of the MAGIC BULLET, a stylized word mark, registration no.

2,947,494, by its sales of counterfeit products including counterfeit marks entitles

Plaintiffs statutory damages up to $200,000. Firemalls intentional, deliberate, and

willful sales of the counterfeit products entitles Plaintiffs to enhanced damages up

to $2,000,000 per counterfeit mark pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1117(c)(2).

VI. THIRD COUNT:

INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. TRADEMARK REG. NO. 4,161,917

11
12

BEVERLY HILLS

37.

10

TROJAN LAW OFFICES

about defective counterfeit products sold by Firemall.

38.

Plaintiffs Capbran incorporate by reference each and every allegation

contained in paragraphs 1 through 37 above as though fully set forth herein.


39.

Firemall

sold

products

designated

as

MAGIC

BULLET

13

NUTRIBULLET PRO 900 SERIES BLENDER/MIXER SYSTEM even though the

14

products were not an authentic NUTRIBULLET PRO 900 product manufactured

15

and distributed by Plaintiff.

16

NUTRIBULLET word marks in marketing the counterfeit product by its

17

designation

18

BLENDER/MIXER SYSTEM. The product packaging clearly used a reproduction

19

of the MAGIC BULLET logo mark, NUTRIBULLET logo mark and word mark.

20

In fact, the boxes were reproductions of the authentic NUTRIBULLET PRO retail

21

boxes used by Plaintiff.

22

40.

of

MAGIC

Firemall used the MAGIC BULLET and

BULLET

NUTRIBULLET

PRO

900

SERIES

On information and belief, Berkowitz directed and authorized

23

Firemalls sales of the counterfeit products, including counterfeit trademarks even

24

though Berkowitz knew that the products were not authentic. On information and

25

belief, Berkowitz knew that the products were not obtained through Plaintiffs

26

authorized distribution channels but still directed Firemall to sell the infringing

27

products.

28

-8CAPBRAN HOLDINGS, LLC, et al. v. FIREMALL LLC, et al.


AMENDED COMPLAINT

Case 2:16-cv-02980-DSF-AFM Document 30 Filed 07/29/16 Page 10 of 29 Page ID #:347

including counterfeit trademarks on the packaging and booklets, is likely to cause

confusion and deception as to the source of Firemalls counterfeit products. In fact,

it did cause some consumer deception because consumers contacted Plaintiffs

regarding defective counterfeit products sold by Defendant Firemall.


42.

On information and belief, Firemall knew that the products it was

selling as NUTRIBULLET PRO 900 was not authentic but a counterfeit. And

despite the fact that it knew that it did not purchase any NUTRIBULLET PRO 900

from Plaintiff or its authorized distributors, Firemall willfully, deliberately and

10

knowingly offered for sale counterfeit products as authentic NUTRIBULLET PRO

11

900 products, constituting trademark infringement and counterfeiting in violation of

12

15 U.S.C. 1114(a).

13
BEVERLY HILLS

The use of counterfeit retail packaging and counterfeit booklets,

TROJAN LAW OFFICES

41.

43.

On information and belief, Firemall has sold its counterfeit products

14

for less than Plaintiffs retail price, stealing sales of Plaintiffs authentic products

15

by selling defective and/or lower quality counterfeit products causing loss of profits

16

to be determined according to proof.

17

44.

Firemalls intentional and willful conduct has damaged Plaintiffs

18

reputation and goodwill because Firemalls counterfeit products are of lower

19

quality and/or defective. In fact, Plaintiffs had to respond to consumer complaints

20

about defective counterfeit products sold by Firemall.

21

45.

In the alternative, pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1117(c)(1), Firemalls

22

infringement of the NUTRI BULLET, a word mark, registration no. 4,161,917, by

23

its sales of counterfeit products including counterfeit marks entitles Plaintiffs

24

statutory damages up to $200,000. Firemalls intentional, deliberate, and willful

25

sales of the counterfeit products entitles Plaintiffs to enhanced damages up to

26

$2,000,000 per counterfeit mark pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1117(c)(2).

27
28

VII. FOURTH COUNT:


-9CAPBRAN HOLDINGS, LLC, et al. v. FIREMALL LLC, et al.
AMENDED COMPLAINT

Case 2:16-cv-02980-DSF-AFM Document 30 Filed 07/29/16 Page 11 of 29 Page ID #:348

1
2
3

BEVERLY HILLS

TROJAN LAW OFFICES

INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. TRADEMARK REG. NO. 4,889,548


46.

Plaintiffs Capbran incorporate by reference each and every allegation

contained in paragraphs 1 through 37 above as though fully set forth herein.


47.

Firemall

sold

products

designated

as

MAGIC

BULLET

NUTRIBULLET PRO 900 SERIES BLENDER/MIXER SYSTEM even though the

products were not an authentic NUTRIBULLET PRO 900 product manufactured

and distributed by Plaintiff.

NUTRIBULLET word marks in marketing the counterfeit product by its

designation

of

MAGIC

Firemall used the MAGIC BULLET and

BULLET

NUTRIBULLET

PRO

900

SERIES

10

BLENDER/MIXER SYSTEM. The product packaging clearly used a reproduction

11

of the MAGIC BULLET logo mark, NUTRIBULLET logo mark and word mark.

12

In fact, the boxes were reproductions of the authentic NUTRIBULLET PRO retail

13

boxes used by Plaintiff.

14

48.

On information and belief, Berkowitz directed and authorized

15

Firemalls sales of the counterfeit products, including counterfeit trademarks even

16

though Berkowitz knew that the products were not authentic. On information and

17

belief, Berkowitz knew that the products were not obtained through Plaintiffs

18

authorized distribution channels but still directed Firemall to sell the infringing

19

products.

20

49.

The use of counterfeit retail packaging and counterfeit booklets,

21

including counterfeit trademarks on the packaging and booklets, is likely to cause

22

confusion and deception as to the source of Firemalls counterfeit products. In fact,

23

it did cause some consumer deception because consumers contacted Plaintiffs

24

regarding defective counterfeit products sold by Defendant Firemall.

25

50.

On information and belief, Firemall knew that the products it was

26

selling as NUTRIBULLET PRO 900 was not authentic but a counterfeit. And

27

despite the fact that it knew that it did not purchase any NUTRIBULLET PRO 900

28

-10CAPBRAN HOLDINGS, LLC, et al. v. FIREMALL LLC, et al.


AMENDED COMPLAINT

Case 2:16-cv-02980-DSF-AFM Document 30 Filed 07/29/16 Page 12 of 29 Page ID #:349

from Plaintiff or its authorized distributors, Firemall willfully, deliberately and

knowingly offered for sale counterfeit products as authentic NUTRIBULLET PRO

900 products, constituting trademark infringement and counterfeiting in violation of

15 U.S.C. 1114(a).

for less than Plaintiffs retail price, stealing sales of Plaintiffs authentic products

by selling defective and/or lower quality counterfeit products causing loss of profits

to be determined according to proof.


52.

Firemalls intentional and willful conduct has damaged Plaintiffs

10

reputation and goodwill because Firemalls counterfeit products are of lower

11

quality and/or defective. In fact, Plaintiffs had to respond to consumer complaints

12

about defective counterfeit products sold by Firemall.

13
BEVERLY HILLS

On information and belief, Firemall has sold its counterfeit products

TROJAN LAW OFFICES

51.

53.

In the alternative, pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1117(c)(1), Firemalls

14

infringement of the NUTRIBULLET, a word mark, registration no. 4,889,548, by

15

its sales of counterfeit products including counterfeit marks entitles Plaintiffs

16

statutory damages up to $200,000. Firemalls intentional, deliberate, and willful

17

sales of the counterfeit products entitles Plaintiffs to enhanced damages up to

18

$2,000,000 per counterfeit mark pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1117(c)(2).

19

VIII. FIFTH COUNT:

20

INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. TRADEMARK REG. NO. 4,316,614

21
22
23

54.

Plaintiffs Capbran incorporate by reference each and every allegation

contained in paragraphs 1 through 53 above as though fully set forth herein.


55.

Firemall

sold

products

designated

as

MAGIC

BULLET

24

NUTRIBULLET PRO 900 SERIES BLENDER/MIXER SYSTEM even though the

25

products were not an authentic NUTRIBULLET PRO 900 product manufactured

26

and distributed by Plaintiff.

27

NUTRIBULLET word marks in marketing the counterfeit product by its

28

Firemall used the MAGIC BULLET and


-11-

CAPBRAN HOLDINGS, LLC, et al. v. FIREMALL LLC, et al.


AMENDED COMPLAINT

Case 2:16-cv-02980-DSF-AFM Document 30 Filed 07/29/16 Page 13 of 29 Page ID #:350

designation

BLENDER/MIXER SYSTEM. The product packaging clearly used a reproduction

of the MAGIC BULLET logo mark, NUTRIBULLET logo mark and word mark.

In fact, the boxes were reproductions of the authentic NUTRIBULLET PRO retail

boxes used by Plaintiff.

BEVERLY HILLS

TROJAN LAW OFFICES

56.

of

MAGIC

BULLET

NUTRIBULLET

PRO

900

SERIES

On information and belief, Berkowitz directed and authorized

Firemalls sales of the counterfeit products, including counterfeit trademarks even

though Berkowitz knew that the products were not authentic. On information and

belief, Berkowitz knew that the products were not obtained through Plaintiffs

10

authorized distribution channels but still directed Firemall to sell the infringing

11

products.

12

57.

The use of counterfeit retail packaging and counterfeit booklets,

13

including counterfeit trademarks on the packaging and booklets, is likely to cause

14

confusion and deception as to the source of Firemalls counterfeit products. In fact,

15

it did cause some consumer deception because consumers contacted Plaintiffs

16

regarding defective counterfeit products sold by Defendant Firemall.

17

58.

On information and belief, Firemall knew that the products it was

18

selling as NUTRIBULLET PRO 900 was not authentic but a counterfeit. And

19

despite the fact that it knew that it did not purchase any NUTRIBULLET PRO 900

20

from Plaintiff or its authorized distributors, Firemall willfully, deliberately and

21

knowingly offered for sale counterfeit products as authentic NUTRIBULLET PRO

22

900 products, constituting trademark infringement and counterfeiting in violation of

23

15 U.S.C. 1114(a).

24

59.

On information and belief, Firemall has sold its counterfeit products

25

for less than Plaintiffs retail price, stealing sales of Plaintiffs authentic products

26

by selling defective and/or lower quality counterfeit products causing loss of profits

27

to be determined according to proof.

28

-12CAPBRAN HOLDINGS, LLC, et al. v. FIREMALL LLC, et al.


AMENDED COMPLAINT

Case 2:16-cv-02980-DSF-AFM Document 30 Filed 07/29/16 Page 14 of 29 Page ID #:351

reputation and goodwill because Firemalls counterfeit products are of lower

quality and/or defective. In fact, Plaintiffs had to respond to consumer complaints

about defective counterfeit products sold by Firemall.


61.

In the alternative, pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1117(c)(1), Firemalls

infringement of the NUTRIBULLET, registration no. 4,316,614, a stylized word

mark, by its sales of counterfeit products including counterfeit marks entitles

Plaintiffs statutory damages up to $200,000. Firemalls intentional, deliberate, and

willful sales of the counterfeit products entitles Plaintiffs to enhanced damages up

10

to $2,000,000 per counterfeit mark pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1117(c)(2).

11

IX. SIXTH COUNT:

12

INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. TRADEMARK REG. NO. 4,526,464

13
BEVERLY HILLS

Firemalls intentional and willful conduct has damaged Plaintiffs

TROJAN LAW OFFICES

60.

14
15

62.

Plaintiffs Capbran incorporate by reference each and every allegation

contained in paragraphs 1 through 61 above as though fully set forth herein.


63.

Firemall

sold

products

designated

as

MAGIC

BULLET

16

NUTRIBULLET PRO 900 SERIES BLENDER/MIXER SYSTEM even though the

17

products were not an authentic NUTRIBULLET PRO 900 product manufactured

18

and distributed by Plaintiff.

19

NUTRIBULLET word marks in marketing the counterfeit product by its

20

designation

21

BLENDER/MIXER SYSTEM. The product packaging clearly used a reproduction

22

of the MAGIC BULLET logo mark, NUTRIBULLET logo mark and word mark.

23

In fact, the boxes were reproductions of the authentic NUTRIBULLET PRO retail

24

boxes used by Plaintiff.

25

64.

of

MAGIC

Firemall used the MAGIC BULLET and

BULLET

NUTRIBULLET

PRO

900

SERIES

On information and belief, Berkowitz directed and authorized

26

Firemalls sales of the counterfeit products, including counterfeit trademarks even

27

though Berkowitz knew that the products were not authentic. On information and

28

-13CAPBRAN HOLDINGS, LLC, et al. v. FIREMALL LLC, et al.


AMENDED COMPLAINT

Case 2:16-cv-02980-DSF-AFM Document 30 Filed 07/29/16 Page 15 of 29 Page ID #:352

belief, Berkowitz knew that the products were not obtained through Plaintiffs

authorized distribution channels but still directed Firemall to sell the infringing

products.

65.

including counterfeit trademarks on the packaging and booklets, is likely to cause

confusion and deception as to the source of Firemalls counterfeit products. In fact,

it did cause some consumer deception because consumers contacted Plaintiffs

regarding defective counterfeit products sold by Defendant Firemall.

BEVERLY HILLS

TROJAN LAW OFFICES

The use of counterfeit retail packaging and counterfeit booklets,

66.

On information and belief, Firemall knew that the products it was

10

selling as NUTRIBULLET PRO 900 was not authentic but a counterfeit. And

11

despite the fact that it knew that it did not purchase any NUTRIBULLET PRO 900

12

from Plaintiff or its authorized distributors, Firemall willfully, deliberately and

13

knowingly offered for sale counterfeit products as authentic NUTRIBULLET PRO

14

900 products, constituting trademark infringement and counterfeiting in violation of

15

15 U.S.C. 1114(a).

16

67.

On information and belief, Firemall has sold its counterfeit products

17

for less than Plaintiffs retail price, stealing sales of Plaintiffs authentic products

18

by selling defective and/or lower quality counterfeit products causing loss of profits

19

to be determined according to proof.

20

68.

Firemalls intentional and willful conduct has damaged Plaintiffs

21

reputation and goodwill because Firemalls counterfeit products are of lower

22

quality and/or defective. In fact, Plaintiffs had to respond to consumer complaints

23

about defective counterfeit products sold by Firemall.

24

69.

In the alternative, pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1117(c)(1), Firemalls

25

infringement of the NUTRIBULLET PRO, a word mark, registration no. 4,526,464,

26

by its sales of counterfeit products including counterfeit marks entitles Plaintiffs

27

statutory damages up to $200,000. Firemalls intentional, deliberate, and willful

28

-14CAPBRAN HOLDINGS, LLC, et al. v. FIREMALL LLC, et al.


AMENDED COMPLAINT

Case 2:16-cv-02980-DSF-AFM Document 30 Filed 07/29/16 Page 16 of 29 Page ID #:353

sales of the counterfeit products entitles Plaintiffs to enhanced damages up to

$2,000,000 per counterfeit mark pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1117(c)(2).

X. SEVENTH COUNT:

INFRINGEMENT OF REGISTERED TRADE DRESS REG. NO. 4,416,702

5
6
7

BEVERLY HILLS

Plaintiffs Capbran incorporate by reference each and every allegation

contained in paragraphs 1 through 69 above as though fully set forth herein.


71.

Firemalls counterfeit products were manufactured to look like

Capbrans authentic NUTRIBULLET PRO 900 products, including a base that has

a rim with a wave design.

10

TROJAN LAW OFFICES

70.

72.

On information and belief, Berkowitz directed and authorized

11

Firemalls sales of the counterfeit products, including counterfeit trade dress even

12

though Berkowitz knew that the products were not authentic. On information and

13

belief, Berkowitz knew that the products were not obtained through Plaintiffs

14

authorized distribution channels but still directed Firemall to sell the infringing

15

products.

16

73.

Firemalls counterfeit products which includes a blender base that

17

looks like Capbrans authentic NUTRIBULLET PRO 900 products that has a rim

18

with a wave design is likely to cause confusion as to the source of Firemalls

19

counterfeit products.

20

consumers contacted Plaintiffs regarding defective counterfeit products sold by

21

Defendant Firemall for warranty repairs thinking that it was authentic

22

NUTRIBULLET PRO 900 products sold and distributed by Plaintiffs.

23

74.

In fact, there was actual consumer deception because

On information and belief, Firemall knew that the products it was

24

selling as NUTRIBULLET PRO 900 was not authentic but a counterfeit. And

25

despite the fact that it knew that it did not purchase any NUTRIBULLET PRO 900

26

from Plaintiffs or its authorized distributors, Firemall willfully, deliberately and

27

knowingly offered for sale counterfeit products as authentic NUTRIBULLET PRO

28

-15CAPBRAN HOLDINGS, LLC, et al. v. FIREMALL LLC, et al.


AMENDED COMPLAINT

Case 2:16-cv-02980-DSF-AFM Document 30 Filed 07/29/16 Page 17 of 29 Page ID #:354

900 products, constituting trade dress infringement and counterfeiting in violation

of 15 U.S.C. 1114(a).

for less than Plaintiffs retail price, stealing sales of Plaintiffs authentic products

by selling defective and/or lower quality counterfeit products causing loss of profits

to be determined according to proof.


76.

Firemalls intentional and willful conduct has damaged Plaintiffs

reputation and goodwill because Firemalls counterfeit products are of lower

quality and/or defective. In fact, Plaintiffs had to respond to consumer complaints

10
11

BEVERLY HILLS

On information and belief, Firemall has sold its counterfeit products

TROJAN LAW OFFICES

75.

about defective counterfeit products sold by Firemall.


77.

In the alternative, pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1117(c)(1), Firemalls

12

infringement of the blender base trade dress, registration no. 4,416,702, by its sales

13

of counterfeit products including counterfeit trade dress entitles Plaintiffs statutory

14

damages up to $200,000. Firemalls intentional, deliberate, and willful sales of the

15

counterfeit products entitles Plaintiffs to enhanced damages up to $2,000,000 per

16

counterfeit mark pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1117(c)(2).

17

XI. EIGHTH COUNT:

18

COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT OF NUTRIBULLET PRO RETAIL BOX

19
20
21

78.

Plaintiffs Capbran incorporate by reference each and every allegation

contained in paragraphs 1 through 77 above as though fully set forth herein.


79.

The counterfeit products that Firemall sold were distributed in retail

22

boxes that look like Plaintiffs authentic retail boxes. On information and belief,

23

Firemall imported the unauthorized copies of Plaintiffs retail boxes for

24

NUTRIBULLET PRO 900 in violation of 17 U.S.C. 602.

25

80.

Firemalls counterfeit products also included unauthorized copies

26

Plaintiffs Pocket Nutritionist Booklet and User Guide & Recipe Book. On

27

information and belief, Firemall imported the unauthorized copies of Plaintiffs

28

-16CAPBRAN HOLDINGS, LLC, et al. v. FIREMALL LLC, et al.


AMENDED COMPLAINT

Case 2:16-cv-02980-DSF-AFM Document 30 Filed 07/29/16 Page 18 of 29 Page ID #:355

1
2

Firemall sold and distributed unauthorized copies of Plaintiffs retail

boxes, and Plaintiffs Pocket Nutritionist and User Guides in connection with

Firemalls sales of counterfeit products in violation of 17 U.S.C. 501 constituting

copyright infringement.
82.

On information and belief, Firemall and Berkowitz (collectively

Defendants) knew that the retail boxes and books were unauthorized copies.

Despite the fact that Defendants knew that the copies were unauthorized,

Defendants knowingly, deliberately, intentionally and willfully distributed

10
11

BEVERLY HILLS

81.

TROJAN LAW OFFICES

books.

unauthorized copies of Plaintiffs works.


83.

On information and belief, Firemall has sold its counterfeit products

12

for less than Plaintiffs retail price including unauthorized copies of Plaintiffs

13

copyrighted retail boxes, stealing sales of Plaintiffs authentic products by selling

14

defective and/or lower quality counterfeit products causing loss of profits to be

15

determined according to proof.

16

84.

In the alternative, pursuant to 17 U.S.C. 504(c)(1), Firemalls

17

copyright infringement of Plaintffs NUTRIBULLET PRO 900 Retail boxes

18

entitles Plaintiffs statutory damages up to $30,000.

19

deliberate, and willful copyright infringement entitles Plaintiffs to enhanced

20

damages up to $150,000 per work infringed mark pursuant to 17 U.S.C.

21

504(c)(2).

Firemalls intentional,

22

XII. NINTH COUNT:

23

COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT OF POCKET NUTRITIONIST BOOK

24
25
26
27
28

85.

Plaintiffs Capbran incorporate by reference each and every allegation

contained in paragraphs 1 through 84 above as though fully set forth herein.


86.

The counterfeit products that Firemall sold were distributed in retail

boxes that look like Plaintiffs authentic retail boxes. On information and belief,
-17CAPBRAN HOLDINGS, LLC, et al. v. FIREMALL LLC, et al.
AMENDED COMPLAINT

Case 2:16-cv-02980-DSF-AFM Document 30 Filed 07/29/16 Page 19 of 29 Page ID #:356

Firemall imported the unauthorized copies of Plaintiffs retail boxes for

NUTRIBULLET PRO 900 in violation of 17 U.S.C. 602.

Plaintiffs Pocket Nutritionist Booklet and User Guide & Recipe Book. On

information and belief, Firemall imported the unauthorized copies of Plaintiffs

books.
88.

Firemall sold and distributed unauthorized copies of Plaintiffs retail

boxes, and Plaintiffs Pocket Nutritionist and User Guides in connection with

Firemalls sales of counterfeit products in violation of 17 U.S.C. 501 constituting

10
11

BEVERLY HILLS

Firemalls counterfeit products also included unauthorized copies

TROJAN LAW OFFICES

87.

copyright infringement.
89.

On information and belief, Firemall and Berkowitz (collectively

12

Defendants) knew that the retail boxes and books were unauthorized copies.

13

Despite the fact that Defendants knew that the copies were unauthorized,

14

Defendants knowingly, deliberately, intentionally and willfully distributed

15

unauthorized copies of Plaintiffs works.

16

90.

On information and belief, Firemall has sold its counterfeit products

17

for less than Plaintiffs retail price including unauthorized copies of Plaintiffs

18

Pocket Nutritionist Book, stealing sales of Plaintiffs authentic products by selling

19

defective and/or lower quality counterfeit products causing loss of profits to be

20

determined according to proof.

21

91.

In the alternative, pursuant to 17 U.S.C. 504(c)(1), Firemalls

22

copyright infringement of Plaintffs Pocket Nutritionist Book entitles Plaintiffs

23

statutory damages up to $30,000. Firemalls intentional, deliberate, and willful

24

copyright infringement entitles Plaintiffs to enhanced damages up to $150,000 per

25

work infringed pursuant to 17 U.S.C. 504(c)(2).

26

XIII. TENTH COUNT:

27

COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT OF USER GUIDE & RECIPE BOOK

28

-18CAPBRAN HOLDINGS, LLC, et al. v. FIREMALL LLC, et al.


AMENDED COMPLAINT

Case 2:16-cv-02980-DSF-AFM Document 30 Filed 07/29/16 Page 20 of 29 Page ID #:357

1
2
3

contained in paragraphs 1 through 83 above as though fully set forth herein.


93.

The counterfeit products that Firemall sold were distributed in retail

boxes that look like Plaintiffs authentic retail boxes. On information and belief,

Firemall imported the unauthorized copies of Plaintiffs retail boxes for

NUTRIBULLET PRO 900 in violation of 17 U.S.C. 602.


94.

Firemalls counterfeit products also included unauthorized copies

Plaintiffs Pocket Nutritionist Booklet and User Guide & Recipe Book. On

information and belief, Firemall imported the unauthorized copies of Plaintiffs

10
11

BEVERLY HILLS

Plaintiffs Capbran incorporates by reference each and every allegation

TROJAN LAW OFFICES

92.

books.
95.

Firemall sold and distributed unauthorized copies of Plaintiffs retail

12

boxes, and Plaintiffs Pocket Nutritionist and User Guides in connection with

13

Firemalls sales of counterfeit products in violation of 17 U.S.C. 501 constituting

14

copyright infringement.

15

96.

On information and belief, Firemall and Berkowitz (collectively

16

Defendants) knew that the retail boxes and books were unauthorized copies.

17

Despite the fact that Defendants knew that the copies were unauthorized,

18

Defendants knowingly, deliberately, intentionally and willfully distributed

19

unauthorized copies of Plaintiffs works.

20

97.

On information and belief, Firemall has sold its counterfeit products

21

for less than Plaintiffs retail price including unauthorized copies of Plaintiffs

22

Pocket Nutritionist Book, stealing sales of Plaintiffs authentic products by selling

23

defective and/or lower quality counterfeit products causing loss of profits to be

24

determined according to proof.

25

98.

In the alternative, pursuant to 17 U.S.C. 504(c)(1), Firemalls

26

copyright infringement of Plaintffs User Guide & Recipe Book entitles Plaintiffs

27

statutory damages up to $30,000. Firemalls intentional, deliberate, and willful

28

-19CAPBRAN HOLDINGS, LLC, et al. v. FIREMALL LLC, et al.


AMENDED COMPLAINT

Case 2:16-cv-02980-DSF-AFM Document 30 Filed 07/29/16 Page 21 of 29 Page ID #:358

copyright infringement entitles Plaintiffs to enhanced damages up to $150,000 per

work infringed pursuant to 17 U.S.C. 504(c)(2).

XIV. ELEVENTH COUNT:

INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. DESIGN PATENT NO. D554,427

5
6
7

BEVERLY HILLS

TROJAN LAW OFFICES

99.

Plaintiffs Capbran incorporate by reference each and every allegation

contained in paragraphs 1 through 98 above as though fully set forth herein.


100. Defendants counterfeit products were manufactured to look like
Capbrans authentic NUTRIBULLET PRO 900 products.

101. In fact, the ordinary observer would be deceived into thinking that

10

Defendants counterfeit products were the same as the patented design in U.S.

11

Design Patent No. D554,427, constituting infringement of Plaintiffs design patent.

12

102. On information and belief, Defendants have sold its counterfeit

13

products for less than Plaintiffs retail price, stealing sales of Plaintiffs authentic

14

products by selling defective and/or lower quality counterfeit products causing loss

15

of profits to be determined according to proof.

16

103. In the alternative, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 289, Plaintiffs are entitled to

17

all of Defendants profits for Defendants infringement of U.S. Design Patent No.

18

D554,427.

19

XV. TWELVETH COUNT:

20

INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. DESIGN PATENT NO. 500,633

21
22
23
24

104. Plaintiffs Capbran incorporate by reference each and every allegation


contained in paragraphs 1 through 103 above as though fully set forth herein.
105. Defendants counterfeit products were manufactured to look like
Capbrans authentic NUTRIBULLET PRO 900 products.

25

106. In fact, the ordinary observer would be deceived into thinking that

26

Defendants counterfeit products were the same as the patented design in U.S.

27

Design Patent No. D500,633, constituting infringement of Plaintiffs design patent.

28

-20CAPBRAN HOLDINGS, LLC, et al. v. FIREMALL LLC, et al.


AMENDED COMPLAINT

Case 2:16-cv-02980-DSF-AFM Document 30 Filed 07/29/16 Page 22 of 29 Page ID #:359

107. On information and belief, Defendants have sold its counterfeit

products for less than Plaintiffs retail price, stealing sales of Plaintiffs authentic

products by selling defective and/or lower quality counterfeit products causing loss

of profits to be determined according to proof.

108. In the alternative, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 289, Plaintiffs are entitled to

all of Defendants profits for Defendants infringement of U.S. Design Patent No.

D500,633.

XVI. THIRTEENTH COUNT:

INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. DESIGN PATENT NO. 532,255

10
11

13
BEVERLY HILLS

TROJAN LAW OFFICES

12

109. Plaintiffs Capbran incorporate by reference each and every allegation


contained in paragraphs 1 through 103 above as though fully set forth herein.
110. Defendants counterfeit products were manufactured to look like
Capbrans authentic NUTRIBULLET PRO 900 products.

14

111. In fact, the ordinary observer would be deceived into thinking that

15

Defendants counterfeit products were the same as the patented design in U.S.

16

Design Patent No. D532,255, constituting infringement of Plaintiffs design patent.

17

112. On information and belief, Defendants have sold its counterfeit

18

products for less than Plaintiffs retail price, stealing sales of Plaintiffs authentic

19

products by selling defective and/or lower quality counterfeit products causing loss

20

of profits to be determined according to proof.

21

113. In the alternative, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 289, Plaintiffs are entitled to

22

all of Defendants profits for Defendants infringement of U.S. Design Patent No.

23

D532,255.

24

XVII. FOURTEENTH COUNT:

25

UNFAIR COMPETITION UNDER CAL. BUS. & PROF. CODE 17200

26
27
28

104. Plaintiffs Capbran incorporate by reference each and every allegation


contained in paragraphs 1 through 103 above as though fully set forth herein.
-21CAPBRAN HOLDINGS, LLC, et al. v. FIREMALL LLC, et al.
AMENDED COMPLAINT

BEVERLY HILLS

TROJAN LAW OFFICES

Case 2:16-cv-02980-DSF-AFM Document 30 Filed 07/29/16 Page 23 of 29 Page ID #:360

105. By engaging in the above-described practices and actions, Defendants

have committed one or more acts of unfair competition within the meaning of

California Business and Professions Code (BPC) 17200 et seq. As used in

this Complaint, and in BPC 17200, unfair competition means (1) an unlawful,

unfair or fraudulent business act or practice; (2) unfair, deceptive, untrue or

misleading advertising; and/or (3) an act prohibited by Chapter 1 (commencing

with BPC 17500). This conduct as alleged is actionable pursuant to BPC

17200 and 17203.

106. Defendants have engaged in, and continue to engage in, such unfair

10

competition with full knowledge that such acts and practices are wrongful,

11

arbitrary, without reasonable business or commercial justification, unethical,

12

oppressive, and have caused substantial harm and injury to Capbran. Moreover,

13

Dedendants conduct, as described above, is unlawful, unfair, and deceptive, and

14

violates BPC 17200 et seq. and constitutes inter alia, trademark infringement,

15

trade dress infringement, design patent infringement, and copyright infringement

16

resulting in injury in fact to Capbran in form of lost revenue, lost profits, lost

17

market share, lost business value and good will, and lost business opportunities as a

18

result of Defendants unlawful actions and practices in violation of BPC sections

19

17200 et seq. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants unlawful conduct,

20

Capbran is entitled to restitution and disgorgement of profits in an amount

21

according to proof at trial and entitled to preliminary and permanent injunctive

22

relief restraining Firemall, its officers, directors, members, agents and employees,

23

and all persons acting in concert with it, from engaging in any further acts in

24

violation of Section 17200 of the California Business and Professions Code.

25

107. To cure the harm caused by the sales of counterfeit products, Firemall

26

must send notices directly to all consumers who purchased the counterfeit products

27

advising such consumers of the deception and giving such consumers the right to a

28

-22CAPBRAN HOLDINGS, LLC, et al. v. FIREMALL LLC, et al.


AMENDED COMPLAINT

Case 2:16-cv-02980-DSF-AFM Document 30 Filed 07/29/16 Page 24 of 29 Page ID #:361

full refund. To prevent future harm, Firemall must be ordered to immediately cease

and desist from any further promotion or sales of the counterfeit products.

XVIII. DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL:

Plaintiff hereby exercises its right to a jury trial under the Seventh

Amendment to the United States Constitution and hereby demands a jury trial in

accordance therewith.
XIX. PRAYER OF RELIEF:

BEVERLY HILLS

TROJAN LAW OFFICES

7
8

WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs Capbran pray as follows:

1.

That Plaintiffs be awarded judgment in its favor and against Defendants;

10

2.

That Plaintiffs be awarded damages in the amount of at least $1,000,000

11

according proof for trademark infringement, trade dress infringement,

12

copyright infringement, design patent infringement, and unfair competition as

13

alleged herein;

14

3.

Awarding statutory damages of up to $200,000 pursuant to Section 35(c) of

15

the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. 1117(c) or, alternatively, Capbrans actual

16

damages and Defendants profits for their violations of Section 32 of the

17

Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. 1114(1)(a)-(b) for infringement of U.S. Trademark

18

registration no. 2,947,492;

19

4.

Awarding enhanced statutory damages of up to $2,000,000 pursuant to 15

20

U.S.C. 1117(c)(2) or alternatively awarding treble damages for Defendants

21

willful and knowing infringement of the registered trademark pursuant to 15

22

U.S.C. 1117(a) for infringement of U.S. Trademark registration no.

23

2,947,492;

24

5.

Awarding statutory damages of up to $200,000 pursuant to Section 35(c) of

25

the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. 1117(c) or, alternatively, Capbrans actual

26

damages and Defendants profits for their violations of Section 32 of the

27
28

-23CAPBRAN HOLDINGS, LLC, et al. v. FIREMALL LLC, et al.


AMENDED COMPLAINT

Case 2:16-cv-02980-DSF-AFM Document 30 Filed 07/29/16 Page 25 of 29 Page ID #:362

Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. 1114(1)(a)-(b) for infringement of U.S. Trademark

registration no. 2,947,494;

U.S.C. 1117(c)(2) or alternatively awarding treble damages for Defendants

willful and knowing infringement of the registered trademark pursuant to 15

U.S.C. 1117(a) for infringement of U.S. Trademark registration no.

2,947,494;
7.

Awarding statutory damages of up to $200,000 pursuant to Section 35(c) of

the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. 1117(c) or, alternatively, Capbrans actual

10

damages and Defendants profits for their violations of Section 32 of the

11

Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. 1114(1)(a)-(b) for infringement of U.S. Trademark

12

registration no. 4,161,917;

13
BEVERLY HILLS

Awarding enhanced statutory damages of up to $2,000,000 pursuant to 15

TROJAN LAW OFFICES

6.

8.

Awarding enhanced statutory damages of up to $2,000,000 pursuant to 15

14

U.S.C. 1117(c)(2) or alternatively awarding treble damages for Defendants

15

willful and knowing infringement of the registered trademark pursuant to 15

16

U.S.C. 1117(a) for infringement of U.S. Trademark registration no.

17

4,161,917;

18

9.

Awarding statutory damages of up to $200,000 pursuant to Section 35(c) of

19

the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. 1117(c) or, alternatively, Capbrans actual

20

damages and Defendants profits for their violations of Section 32 of the

21

Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. 1114(1)(a)-(b) for infringement of U.S. Trademark

22

registration no. 4,889,548;

23

10.

Awarding enhanced statutory damages of up to $2,000,000 pursuant to 15

24

U.S.C. 1117(c)(2) or alternatively awarding treble damages for Defendants

25

willful and knowing infringement of the registered trademark pursuant to 15

26

U.S.C. 1117(a) for infringement of U.S. Trademark registration no.

27

4,889,548;

28

-24CAPBRAN HOLDINGS, LLC, et al. v. FIREMALL LLC, et al.


AMENDED COMPLAINT

Case 2:16-cv-02980-DSF-AFM Document 30 Filed 07/29/16 Page 26 of 29 Page ID #:363

11.

the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. 1117(c) or, alternatively, Capbrans actual

damages and Defendants profits for their violations of Section 32 of the

Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. 1114(1)(a)-(b) for infringement of U.S. Trademark

registration no. 4,316,614;

12.

U.S.C. 1117(c)(2) or alternatively awarding treble damages for Defendants

willful and knowing infringement of the registered trademark pursuant to 15

U.S.C. 1117(a) for infringement of U.S. Trademark registration no.

11

BEVERLY HILLS

Awarding enhanced statutory damages of up to $2,000,000 pursuant to 15

4,316,614;

10

TROJAN LAW OFFICES

Awarding statutory damages of up to $200,000 pursuant to Section 35(c) of

13.

Awarding statutory damages of up to $200,000 pursuant to Section 35(c) of

12

the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. 1117(c) or, alternatively, Capbrans actual

13

damages and Defendants profits for their violations of Section 32 of the

14

Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. 1114(1)(a)-(b) for infringement of U.S. Trademark

15

registration no. 4,526,464;

16

14.

Awarding enhanced statutory damages of up to $2,000,000 pursuant to 15

17

U.S.C. 1117(c)(2) or alternatively awarding treble damages for Defendants

18

willful and knowing infringement of the registered trademark pursuant to 15

19

U.S.C. 1117(a) for infringement of U.S. Trademark registration no.

20

4,526,464;

21

15.

Awarding statutory damages of up to $200,000 pursuant to Section 35(c) of

22

the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. 1117(c) or, alternatively, Capbrans actual

23

damages and Defendants profits for their violations of Section 32 of the

24

Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. 1114(1)(a)-(b) for infringement of U.S. Trademark

25

registration no. 4,416,702;

26
27
28

16.

Awarding enhanced statutory damages of up to $2,000,000 pursuant to 15


U.S.C. 1117(c)(2) or alternatively awarding treble damages for Defendants
-25CAPBRAN HOLDINGS, LLC, et al. v. FIREMALL LLC, et al.
AMENDED COMPLAINT

Case 2:16-cv-02980-DSF-AFM Document 30 Filed 07/29/16 Page 27 of 29 Page ID #:364

willful and knowing infringement of the registered trademark pursuant to 15

U.S.C. 1117(a) for infringement of U.S. Trademark registration no.

4,416,702;

17.

for copyright infringement of NUTRIBULLET PRO RETAIL BOX or,

alternatively, Capbrans actual damages and Defendants profits for their

violation of the 17 U.S.C. 501;

18.

NUTRIBULLET PRO RETAIL BOX;

10

BEVERLY HILLS

11

Awarding increased statutory damages up to $150,000 pursuant to 17 U.S.C.


504(c)(2) for Defendants willful and knowing infringement of

TROJAN LAW OFFICES

Awarding statutory damages up to $30,000 pursuant to 17 U.S.C. 504(c)(1)

19.

Awarding statutory damages up to $30,000 pursuant to 17 U.S.C. 504(c)(1)

12

for copyright infringement of Pocket Nutritionist Book or, alternatively,

13

Capbrans actual damages and Defendants profits for their violation of the

14

17 U.S.C. 501;

15

20.

Awarding increased statutory damages up to $150,000 pursuant to 17 U.S.C.

16

504(c)(2) for Defendants willful and knowing infringement of Pocket

17

Nutritionist Book;

18

21.

Awarding statutory damages up to $30,000 pursuant to 17 U.S.C. 504(c)(1)

19

for copyright infringement of User Guide & Recipe Bookor, alternatively,

20

Capbrans actual damages and Defendants profits for their violation of the

21

17 U.S.C. 501;

22

22.

Awarding increased statutory damages up to $150,000 pursuant to 17 U.S.C.

23

504(c)(2) for Defendants willful and knowing infringement of User

24

Guide & Recipe Book;

25
26

23.

Awarding Plaintiffs lost profits as a result of Defendants infringement of


U.S. Patent No. D554,427 pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 284 or, alternatively,

27
28

-26CAPBRAN HOLDINGS, LLC, et al. v. FIREMALL LLC, et al.


AMENDED COMPLAINT

Case 2:16-cv-02980-DSF-AFM Document 30 Filed 07/29/16 Page 28 of 29 Page ID #:365

Defendants profits for infringement of Capbrans design patent pursuant to

35 U.S.C. 289;

24.

U.S. Patent No. D500,633 pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 284 or, alternatively,

Defendants profits for infringement of Capbrans design patent pursuant to

35 U.S.C. 289;

25.

U.S. Patent No. D532,255 pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 284 or, alternatively,

Defendants profits for infringement of Capbrans design patent pursuant to

11

BEVERLY HILLS

Awarding Plaintiffs lost profits as a result of Defendants infringement of

35 U.S.C. 289;

10

TROJAN LAW OFFICES

Awarding Plaintiffs lost profits as a result of Defendants infringement of

26.

Firemall to be ordered to send notice to all consumers who purchased the

12

counterfeit products advising such consumers of the counterfeit products and

13

giving such consumers the right to a full refund;

14

27.

To prevent future harm, Firemall must be ordered to immediately cease sales

15

of counterfeit products and all counterfeit products to be impounded pursuant

16

15 U.S.C. 1116(d)(1)(A);

17

28.

the full extent provided by Section 35 of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. 1117;

18
19

29.
30.

Awarding Capbrans costs and attorneys fees to the full extent provided by
35 U.S.C. 285;

22
23

Awarding Capbrans costs, attorney's fees, investigatory fees and expenses to


the full extent provided by 17 U.S.C. 505;

20
21

Awarding Capbrans costs, attorney's fees, investigatory fees and expenses to

31.

An award of punitive damages in accordance with Cal. Civ. Code 3294 of

24

an amount adequate to punish and deter Defendants from engaging in sales of

25

such counterfeit products;

26

32.

Plaintiff be awarded its costs of suit and reasonable attorney fees;

27

33.

Interest on all damages, according to proof; and

28

-27CAPBRAN HOLDINGS, LLC, et al. v. FIREMALL LLC, et al.


AMENDED COMPLAINT

Case 2:16-cv-02980-DSF-AFM Document 30 Filed 07/29/16 Page 29 of 29 Page ID #:366

34.

Any and all other relief the Court deems just.

Respectfully submitted,

TROJAN LAW OFFICES


by

4
5
6
7
8

July 29, 2016

/s/R. Joseph Trojan


R. Joseph Trojan
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

9
10
11

13
BEVERLY HILLS

TROJAN LAW OFFICES

12

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-28CAPBRAN HOLDINGS, LLC, et al. v. FIREMALL LLC, et al.


AMENDED COMPLAINT

Case 2:16-cv-02980-DSF-AFM Document 30-1 Filed 07/29/16 Page 1 of 8 Page ID #:367

Exhibit1

Case 2:16-cv-02980-DSF-AFM Document 30-1 Filed 07/29/16 Page 2 of 8 Page ID #:368

Case 2:16-cv-02980-DSF-AFM Document 30-1 Filed 07/29/16 Page 3 of 8 Page ID #:369

Case 2:16-cv-02980-DSF-AFM Document 30-1 Filed 07/29/16 Page 4 of 8 Page ID #:370

Case 2:16-cv-02980-DSF-AFM Document 30-1 Filed 07/29/16 Page 5 of 8 Page ID #:371

Case 2:16-cv-02980-DSF-AFM Document 30-1 Filed 07/29/16 Page 6 of 8 Page ID #:372

Case 2:16-cv-02980-DSF-AFM Document 30-1 Filed 07/29/16 Page 7 of 8 Page ID #:373

Case 2:16-cv-02980-DSF-AFM Document 30-1 Filed 07/29/16 Page 8 of 8 Page ID #:374

Case 2:16-cv-02980-DSF-AFM Document 30-2 Filed 07/29/16 Page 1 of 5 Page ID #:375

Exhibit2

Case 2:16-cv-02980-DSF-AFM Document 30-2 Filed 07/29/16 Page 2 of 5 Page ID #:376

Case 2:16-cv-02980-DSF-AFM Document 30-2 Filed 07/29/16 Page 3 of 5 Page ID #:377

Case 2:16-cv-02980-DSF-AFM Document 30-2 Filed 07/29/16 Page 4 of 5 Page ID #:378

Case 2:16-cv-02980-DSF-AFM Document 30-2 Filed 07/29/16 Page 5 of 5 Page ID #:379

Case 2:16-cv-02980-DSF-AFM Document 30-3 Filed 07/29/16 Page 1 of 23 Page ID #:380

Exhibit3

Case 2:16-cv-02980-DSF-AFM Document 30-3 Filed 07/29/16 Page 2 of 23 Page ID #:381

Case 2:16-cv-02980-DSF-AFM Document 30-3 Filed 07/29/16 Page 3 of 23 Page ID #:382

Case 2:16-cv-02980-DSF-AFM Document 30-3 Filed 07/29/16 Page 4 of 23 Page ID #:383

Case 2:16-cv-02980-DSF-AFM Document 30-3 Filed 07/29/16 Page 5 of 23 Page ID #:384

Case 2:16-cv-02980-DSF-AFM Document 30-3 Filed 07/29/16 Page 6 of 23 Page ID #:385

Case 2:16-cv-02980-DSF-AFM Document 30-3 Filed 07/29/16 Page 7 of 23 Page ID #:386

Case 2:16-cv-02980-DSF-AFM Document 30-3 Filed 07/29/16 Page 8 of 23 Page ID #:387

Case 2:16-cv-02980-DSF-AFM Document 30-3 Filed 07/29/16 Page 9 of 23 Page ID #:388

Case 2:16-cv-02980-DSF-AFM Document 30-3 Filed 07/29/16 Page 10 of 23 Page ID


#:389

Case 2:16-cv-02980-DSF-AFM Document 30-3 Filed 07/29/16 Page 11 of 23 Page ID


#:390

Case 2:16-cv-02980-DSF-AFM Document 30-3 Filed 07/29/16 Page 12 of 23 Page ID


#:391

Case 2:16-cv-02980-DSF-AFM Document 30-3 Filed 07/29/16 Page 13 of 23 Page ID


#:392

Case 2:16-cv-02980-DSF-AFM Document 30-3 Filed 07/29/16 Page 14 of 23 Page ID


#:393

Case 2:16-cv-02980-DSF-AFM Document 30-3 Filed 07/29/16 Page 15 of 23 Page ID


#:394

Case 2:16-cv-02980-DSF-AFM Document 30-3 Filed 07/29/16 Page 16 of 23 Page ID


#:395

Case 2:16-cv-02980-DSF-AFM Document 30-3 Filed 07/29/16 Page 17 of 23 Page ID


#:396

Case 2:16-cv-02980-DSF-AFM Document 30-3 Filed 07/29/16 Page 18 of 23 Page ID


#:397

Case 2:16-cv-02980-DSF-AFM Document 30-3 Filed 07/29/16 Page 19 of 23 Page ID


#:398

Case 2:16-cv-02980-DSF-AFM Document 30-3 Filed 07/29/16 Page 20 of 23 Page ID


#:399

Case 2:16-cv-02980-DSF-AFM Document 30-3 Filed 07/29/16 Page 21 of 23 Page ID


#:400

Case 2:16-cv-02980-DSF-AFM Document 30-3 Filed 07/29/16 Page 22 of 23 Page ID


#:401

Case 2:16-cv-02980-DSF-AFM Document 30-3 Filed 07/29/16 Page 23 of 23 Page ID


#:402

Case 2:16-cv-02980-DSF-AFM Document 30-4 Filed 07/29/16 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:403

Exhibit4

Case 2:16-cv-02980-DSF-AFM Document 30-4 Filed 07/29/16 Page 2 of 6 Page ID #:404

Case 2:16-cv-02980-DSF-AFM Document 30-4 Filed 07/29/16 Page 3 of 6 Page ID #:405

Case 2:16-cv-02980-DSF-AFM Document 30-4 Filed 07/29/16 Page 4 of 6 Page ID #:406

Case 2:16-cv-02980-DSF-AFM Document 30-4 Filed 07/29/16 Page 5 of 6 Page ID #:407

Case 2:16-cv-02980-DSF-AFM Document 30-4 Filed 07/29/16 Page 6 of 6 Page ID #:408

Anda mungkin juga menyukai