OF A FIRM
By
USMAN SALEEM MOHAMMED
A thesis
submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements
for the degree of Master of Business Administration
to Office of Research, Innovation & Commercialization
(formerly Iqra University Research Centre - IURC)
at the Iqra University,
main campus, Karachi
Karachi, Pakistan
JUNE, 2015
Acknowledgements
On the completion of this report, I would like pay my sincere thanks to Allah (SWT)
who paved the way for me to conduct this research. Besides, this research would not
have been possible without the guidance and support of my instructors and teachers
who were always there to help me out and guide me about how to conduct a
comprehensive research.
I feel deep gratitude and pleasure to thank my research supervisor Dr. M.A.K. Chishty
for his relentless assistance and selfless guidance on any issue pertaining to the
research. Without his guidance, this research couldnt have been completed on time.
I would also like to express my gratitude to the academic and technical staff of Office
of Research, Innovation & Commercialization (ORIC) that helped in analyzing the
data and guided me a lot in data gathering and analyses. Furthermore I would like to
thank all those employees and consumers who participated in this research and helped
in the collection of data.
Also, I would like to thank my family and friends who assisted me in every possible
manner to complete my thesis.
Abstract
With the cut-throat competition thriving between brands in the industry at its zenith, it
is becoming tough for firms to find inspiration and innovative products to please their
target market. With the consumers dynamic demanding patterns, firm strive hard to
satisfy the consumers with ground-breaking attributes in products and grab the
attention of the buyers towards their brand. Product-line extension is one strategy
used by managers to tout a multi-product tactic for their brand. This research tends to
probe the impact of product line extension on the sales image of the firm. This
research was a descriptive, Likert scale based study. The source of information
collected was primary data, collected from the target audience of the research through
a questionnaire. The data collected was statistically tested via Regression for
quantitative analysis. On the basis of the numerical results, the research formed a
conclusion at the end of the report, suggesting policy implications and the potential
research in the area.
Table of Contents
DESCRIPTION
S.No.
PAGE
NO.
Acknowledgement
1.
...
Abstract...
ii
2.
List of
iii
3.
Tables..
List of
4.
5.
Figure..
Chapter 1:
Introduction..
vi
1
1.1.
Overview.
1.2. Problem statement .
.
1.3 Background, Objectives and Significance of the
study
1.4. Outline of the Study.
1.5. Definitions...
6.
7.
2.1 Hypotheses..
..
Chapter 3: Research Methods.
14
3.6. Statistical
8.
Technique..
Chapter 4:
Results..
17
Summary..
Chapter 5: Discussions, Conclusion, Policy Implications and
Future Research..
5.1. Discussions...
...
5.2. Conclusion .
.
5.3. Policy
Implications..
5.4. Future Research...
21
References..
10.
Appendix..
23
11.
..
25
List of Tables
S.No.
1.
2.
3.
4.
4.
TABLE(S)
3.1. Reliability Statistics.
4.1. Model Summary ..
4.2. ANOVA.........
4.3. Coefficients.........
4.4. Hypotheses Assessment Summary..
PAGE NO.
15
17
17
18
18
List of Figures
S.No.
1.
FIGURE(S)
3.1. Research Model ...
PAGE NO.
16
Chapter 1: Introduction
1.1 Overview
Product line extension is basically launching a new product which is an
extension of a previous or principal product under the familiar brand name and is
slightly different from the original ones. For example Pepsi is a brand and a product
where as diet Pepsi is a product line extension.
The purpose of the product line extension is to grab the attention of more diverse
customers with more added value or benefits with same or more improved quality.
Brand extension is basically expanding the brand itself. For example Coca-Cola is a
brand and Pulpy Orange juice is a brand extension of Coca Cola. Both product line
extension and brand extension increases the profit of a company because they
introduces a new product in the market with reduced costs, more benefits and attracts
more diverse customers geographically.
Introducing a new product line or brand extension can be a risk as well because if the
new product or a brand is a complete failure it could dull down the companys name
and the customers will not support any of the companys products in future.
A line extension plays a vital role in keeping a brand alive and to acknowledge
incremental money related development for an organization. Line extensions have
almost very little esteem over existing products, and that cannibalization is intimately
linked with the success of a product line extension. As per Aaker (1991) launching a
new brand extension have become more difficult because of the rising cost that incurs
in terms of advertising and distribution channels, it is easier to launch a product line
extension as it has less chances of failure then brand extension because of the
1.5 Definition
1.5.1
2.1 Hypotheses
There are several hypothesis developed for this study that would help in
conducting the research in a proper manner. These hypotheses are outline below:
H1: Pack size has a significant effect on the sales image of a firm.
N of Items
.853
31
The table 3.1 identifies that whether the instrument used in the research is reliable or
not. Cronbach`s Alpha is .853 which is acceptable. As Cronbach`s Alpha is within the
acceptable region thus this proves that the instrument used for data collection in this
research is reliable.
Source: Self-made
Chapter 4: Results
4.1 Findings and interpretation of the results
Table 4.1: Model Summary
Model Summary
R
Square
Model
.346a
.119
.103
.38197
The table of Model Summary shows the R value as 0.346 and the value of R.
square as 0.119. This means that we can analyze and interpret the model correctly up
to 34.6%. This depicts that the model has ample room for improvement.
Table 4.2: ANOVA
ANOVAb
Sum of
Squares
df
Mean
Square
Sig.
Regression
5.425
1.085
7.437
.000a
Residual
39.976
274
.146
Total
45.401
279
Model
The table represents ANOVA analyses, exhibiting that F=7.437 and sig. value as 0.000
and is <0.005. This shows that the model is statistically significant and the
independent variables can significantly predict the dependent variable.
Table 4.3: Coefficients
Std. Error
(Constant)
2.981
.149
Pack Size
.059
.029
Pack Type
.039
Packaging
Standardize
d
Coefficients
Beta
Sig.
20.057
.000
.133
2.022
.044
.031
.085
1.272
.204
.063
.031
.143
2.077
.039
Flavor
.034
.026
.080
1.319
.188
Design
.024
.027
.057
.889
.375
Hypotheses
Sig. Value
Empirical
Evidence
.044
Accept
.204
Reject
.039
Accept
.188
Reject
.375
Reject
5.2 Conclusion
By conducting this research study it has been established that pack size and
packaging are the only variables that were discovered to be significant for product
line extensions impact on the sales image of the firm. Whereas, the remaining three
variables namely flavor, design and pack type were revealed to have no significant
effect whatsoever for product line extensions impact on sales of the product. As a
result, it can be concluded that consumers are influenced by line extension of a
product that offer different, innovative packaging and are made available in other
various pack sizes. Consumers are less drawn towards new flavor, design or pack type
of the product in its line extension. Ultimately, sales will be drawn via new pack sizes
and packaging in extension of a line.
References
Altuna, O. (2010), "The effect of brand extensions on product brand image", Journal
of Product & Brand Management, vol. 19 (3), pp. 170 180
Ambler, T., & Styles, C. (1996). Brand development versus new product
development: towards a process model of extension decisions. Marketing Intelligence
& Planning, 14(7), 10-19.
Clark Sinapuelas, I., & Ram Sisodiya, S. (2010). Do line extensions influence parent
brand equity? An investigation of supermarket packaged goods. Journal of Product &
Brand Management, 19(1), 18-26.
Desai, K. K., & Hoyer, W. D. (1993). Line extensions: a categorization and an
information processing perspective. Advances in Consumer Research, 20(1), 599-606.
Draganska, M. & Jain, D. (2005), Product-Line length as a competitive tool,
Journal of Economics & Management strategy, vol. 14 (1), pp.1 28
Hanslin, K., & Rindell, A. (2014). Consumer-brand relationships in step-down line
extensions of luxury and designer brands. Journal of Fashion Marketing and
Management, 18(2), 145-168.
Kim, B. D., & Sullivan, M. W. (1998). The effect of parent brand experience on line
extension trial and repeat purchase. Marketing Letters, 9(2), 181-193.
Kim, C. Lavack, A. (1996), "Vertical brand extensions: current research and
managerial implications", Journal of Product & Brand Management, vol. 5 (6),
pp. 24 37
Appendix
Table 3.1: Reliability Statistics
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
Alpha
N of Items
.853
31
R
Square
.346a
.119
.38197
df
Mean
Square
Sig.
Regression
5.425
1.085
7.437
.000a
Residual
39.976
274
.146
Total
45.401
279
Model
Std. Error
(Constant)
2.981
.149
Pack Size
.059
.029
Pack Type
.039
Packaging
Standardize
d
Coefficients
t
Sig.
20.057
.000
.133
2.022
.044
.031
.085
1.272
.204
.063
.031
.143
2.077
.039
Flavor
.034
.026
.080
1.319
.188
Design
.024
.027
.057
.889
.375
Beta
Variable View
Data View
Gender:
Male
Female
Contact Number: ..
Occupation: ..
Designation: ..
Age: 15-20yrs
21-30yrs
31-40yrs
41-50yrs
High
Moderate
Low
Very Low
a) Pack Size
b) Pack Type
c) Packaging
d) Flavor
e) Design
2. Given below are some statements related to Impact of Product Line Extension
on the Sales Image of a Firm. For each statement, kindly specify your level of
agreement or disagreement by putting a tick mark in the appropriate boxes.
Strongly Agree
5
Agree
Undecided
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Statement
New packaging of a product influences buying choice for a
product
The consumer is more influenced to purchase products that are
available in various pack sizes
The consumer is induced to try out a new pack size of a product
than the one he usually buys
1
1
Very High
High
Moderate
Low
Very Low
a)Appearance
b) Shape
c) Color
d) Style
e) Smell
f) Function
g) Feel
h) Ease of Use