28 tayangan

Diunggah oleh AlutsyahLuthfian

Numerous methods have been used for upward continuation, but most of them require data on a regular grid. Gridding can introduce errors that affect the continued data in an unpredictable way. To avoid this problem, we design a continuation operator used for the direct continuation of scattered data on a 3-D basis. In this approach a harmonic function, satisfying the constraints imposed by the measured data, is developed.

Numerous methods have been used for upward continuation, but most of them require data on a regular grid. Gridding can introduce errors that affect the continued data in an unpredictable way. To avoid this problem, we design a continuation operator used for the direct continuation of scattered data on a 3-D basis. In this approach a harmonic function, satisfying the constraints imposed by the measured data, is developed.

© All Rights Reserved

- Comparison of Spatial Interpolation Methods for Precipitation in Ningxia, China
- Linear Interpolation With Excel
- Akkala 2010
- WhatsNew.rtf
- Morris County NJ FIRM: Panel 229F
- Topographic Map of Wied
- 1012 Oil Report
- Map Maker Pro Guide
- Topographic Map of Bland
- Checking Arbitrage in Implied Vol Using the RND
- How to Report on Cross Company Stock in Transit.pdf
- Survey Report
- sdarticle
- Function Approximation
- NM
- Final Residential Effect
- Topographic Map of Richland Springs
- OF2010-4
- manual ads
- ds691

Anda di halaman 1dari 9

org/

source are known, the computation of the continued field is

straightforward. To find the source, its geometry must first be

fixed. For gravity data, Dampney (1969) chose a set of point

sources located on a plane below the data points. This configuration was, however, recognized as inefficient. Instead, GraberBrunner et al. (1991) placed an equivalent source layer made

of square, constant thickness prisms at a constant distance from

the surface that interpolates all measurement points. The optimum distance can be determined according to the results

of Xia and Sprowl (1991). The densities of the sources are

then calculated solving a system of linear algebraic equations.

Bhattacharyya and Chan (1977) chose a set of dipoles placed

at data points for magnetic data and an equivalent surface density distribution for gravity data. The dipole moments and the

density distribution are calculated solving a Fredholm integral equation of the second kind. For 2-D magnetic anomalies,

Hansen and Miyazaki (1984) considered a surface composed

of a set of plane faces with constant magnetic moment over

each face.

The method of Bhattacharyya and Chan is recognized to be

unstable when topography is very rugged. Another problem

is that rugged topography causes distortion in potential field

data because of the varying vertical separation of measurement points from the equivalent source. Several methods have

been proposed to overcome these limitations. We discuss those

by Pilkington and Urquhart (1990) and Xia et al. (1993). The

first consists of computing the equivalent source distribution

on a mirror image of the observed surface that is then replaced

by a horizontal plane. The second consists of determining the

equivalent source distribution on a horizontal plane by iterative forward calculation of the anomaly on the topographic

surface in the wavenumber domain.

All methods mentioned above need, in a direct or indirect

way, data measured on a regular grid. This is seldom the case,

so gridding must be used. However, as pointed out by Cordell

(1992), "Gridding embodies forgotten compromises made at

an early stage of analysis from which we may suffer from now

on." Scattered data in 3-D space are invariably gridded using 2-D algorithms, and the grid interval is often too small

ABSTRACT

Numerous methods have been used for upward continuation, but most of them require data on a regular

grid. Gridding can introduce errors that affect the continued data in an unpredictable way. To avoid this problem, we design a continuation operator used for the direct continuation of scattered data on a 3-D basis. In

this approach a harmonic function, satisfying the constraints imposed by the measured data, is developed.

The continuation is written in the form of a linear combination of the measured data, but it depends on the

arbitrary choice of the topographic zero level. However,

the coefficients of the linear combination depend only

on the position of the data points. This allows the zero

level to be estimated on the basis of the continuation of

synthetic anomalies calculated between the starting and

ending surface. An important feature of the method is

its local character, which allows the reduction of computation time. Also, the stability of the method for noisy

data is reasonably good. The method is applied to both

synthetic and real cases. Synthetic examples show how

gridding-related errors may affect the continuation when

an irregular distribution of data points and a variable topography are considered.

INTRODUCTION

geophysics. It can be used, for example, to enhance the signal

of deeper sources when shallower ones are present. Upward

continuation becomes complicated when complex starting and

ending surfaces are used.

Many authors have proposed methods to deal with this

problem. The equivalent source method probably enjoys the

most popularity. It consists of finding an equivalent source

that fits the measured data. Once the characteristics of the

Manuscript received by the Editor October 28, 1996; revised manuscript received June 30, 1998.

*Dipartimento di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, University di Napoli "Federico II", Largo S. Marcellino 10, 80138 Naples, Italy. E-mail: fedi@axposf.dgv.

unina.it; rapolla@unina.it.

$Dipartimento di Scienze Fisiche, University di Napoli "Federico II", Mostra d'Oltremare, Pad. 16, 80125 Naples, Italy. E-mail: gguido.russo@

na.infn.it.

1999 Society of Exploration Geophysicists. All rights reserved.

443

Fedi et al.

Downloaded 03/25/15 to 169.230.243.252. Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use at http://library.seg.org/

444

method based on the equivalent source concept. This consists

of calculating, iteratively, the densities at discrete points beneath a subset of data points at a depth proportional to the

distance to the nearest neighboring data point. This method

requires no linear systems of equations to be solved but leaves

one parameter to be determined by trial and error.

Among the methods that use scattered data are those of

Henderson and Cordell (1971), Parker and Klitgord (1972),

and Ducruix et al. (1974). The first consists of approximating

the gravity field by means of a finite harmonic series whose

coefficients are determined by least squares. In the 3-D case, the

order of the approximation is limited because a large number

of coefficients must be determined. For example, for a sixthorder harmonic series, at least 169 data points are required.

Accordingly, the solution involves the inversion of rather large

matrices. The second is a 2-D method based on the SchwarzChristoffel mapping of data lying on an uneven profile to points

on a straight line.

The third method, which expands the 2-D method of Courtillot et al. (1973) to three dimensions, calculates the continuation using an approximate expression of the continuation

operator in terms of trigonometric polynomials. This method

assumes that the anomaly field is band-limited; however, this

assumption is not necessary, and the same authors later proposed (Courtillot et al., 1978) a more general method, which

has been used for downward continuation of MAGSAT data

(Achache et al., 1987). A serious problem of upward continuation is that the continuation operator depends on the altitude

zero level (Courtillot et al., 1978), the choice of which may

distort the continued data.

We propose an inverse approach that does not create any

distortion effect because it uses an optimized zero level. It is

based on finding a harmonic function coinciding at data points

with the measured values. It has two remarkable characteristics. First, since no previous interpolation is needed, it can be

applied to scattered data sets. Second, the continuation operator has a local character because not all the points of the data

set contribute significantly to the continuation at a given point.

The number of calculations needed to perform continuation

is reduced, and there is no need for additional computational

time to perform the interpolation. The importance of direct

continuation of scattered data is that no arbitrary information

is introduced, in a direct or indirect way, that can cause unpredictable errors in the continued data.

THE CONTINUATION OPERATOR

where

G(r, r') _ m

normal of the element ds', r is the position of a point inside S, r'

is the position of a point on S, and s is the Green's function.

This formula can be rewritten as

(D(r) = 4^

ff

S

,

r) (3)

to the scalar product defined on S of the kernel G and the

potential on the surface.

Consider a set of points Pi at positions r ; where the potential is known. If none of these points coincide and belong to

S, the set of G(r ; , r') = G ; (r') is a linearly independent set of

functions defined on S and generates a vectorial subspace V.

Any function t (r') defined on S can be written as the sum of

an element of V and an element of the orthogonal complement

V 1 of V:

4(r') = 4 v (r') +

:1(r'). (4)

(G 1 (r') I c(r')) = d, Vi,

(5)

expression (4) into expression (5), we see that only the 1v

component of t (r') affects the value of di , so we may choose

O i 1 at will. Since

(6)

norm, (D v l must be the null vector. Hence, we can write

cI(r') =

a i G^(r'),

(7)

We have

where g,j = (G ; 1G 3 ). The matrix g of elements g, 1 is called the

Gram matrix. The left side of the last equality in equation (8)

represents the matrix product of the Gram matrix and the column vector whose components are the coefficients a. If we

premultiply both sides of the last equality by the inverse of the

Gram matrix, we obtain

a; _

gI.j ' dj .

(9)

t(r')=G,(r')>g Ii t dj .

(D(r) --4 7r.^,1 0(r) a an'' r) ds', (1)

ar,

(10)

with G ; (r') expressed in spherical coordinates can be found

in Achache et al. (1987). We discuss its application to upward

continuation in Cartesian coordinates.

Consider a Cartesian coordinate reference system with the

vertical axis directed upward. Suppose that S is the plane z = 0,

and points inside S are those belonging to the half- space z > 0.

Let Q be one of these points, with position q. The function

G(r, q), when q - r', becomes

G(r,

r) 27L

[(x x') 2 + (y y') 2 + z2]3/2 .

(11)

445

Downloaded 03/25/15 to 169.230.243.252. Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use at http://library.seg.org/

singularity at q = r. However, Courtillot et al. (1978) found

a function H(r,

( q) that is harmonic inq such that H(i, q) =

G(r, q) when Q is on S, where r is the position of the image point

of P with respect to S (see Figure 1). Hence, by the definition

of g,j , we have

gij

^(r) _ ^ di ^ H(ij, r)gij l t = Ki di,

(18)

where

, r') ds'

Ki =

= 4^

ff

continuation operator. From equations (18) and (19) it is seen

that the continued field is expressed by a linear combination of

the measured data. The coefficients of the linear combination

depend only on the spatial distribution of the data points.

The results above also apply to any derivative of the potential, such as the gravity field.

The matrix g is symmetric, so it is always diagonalizable and

its eigenvalues are real. If we call U the matrix whose columns

are the eigenvectors of g and A the diagonal matrix made up

by the eigenvalues of g, we have

(12)

(13)

where

1 zi +zj

H(rJ

(14)

Moreover, we have

ai (G(r r') I Gi (r'))

,

(20)

g 1 = (UAU') -1 = UA - lUt.

(21)

Note that

g = UAU`.

(15)

where we used equation (7) and the fact that H(i, q) - G(r, q)

when Q is on S. Noting that, by equation (2),

(16)

ch(r)=^H(ri,r)^gij l dj,

(17)

we can wnte

by equation (17) is harmonic in the half-space z > 0, and satisfies the condition 1)(r,) = d i for every i.

k)

potential is known at point Pi , while the continuation is required at point P. Point P is the image of P. Point Q is a

generic point belonging to half-space z > 0.

From this equation it is seen that the variance of the coefficients a i (and hence of') depends on a linear combination of

the inverse of the square of the eigenvalues. When some of the

eigenvalues are small, this variance can be large. Under this

condition it may be useful to discard the contribution related

to these eigenvalues to reduce the variance (Jackson, 1972).

This in turn reduces the model resolution (Backus and Gilbert,

1968, 1970). Trials must be made to reach the best compromise

between low variance and high resolution (Parker, 1977).

OPTIMIZATION OF THE CONTINUATION OPERATOR

Equation (17) can be simplified computationally because the

continuation operator has a local nature. Suppose that data

have been sampled on a regular grid of spacing S and that continuation is required to a point at height h right above point P.

If PP is a point at distance nS from P i , we have, by equation (11),

G j /G ; = 1/(1 + w2)312, with w=nS/h. The dimensionless parameter w is referred to as the half-width of the continuation

operator (Achache et al., 1987). For w = 3, G j / G ; = 0.03, indicating that points outside the half-width w = 3 contribute little

to D(r'), as expressed by equation (10). These points may be

discarded when continuation is performed, saving computation

time. However, greater values of w can be used when unevenly

sampled data on an irregular surface are considered. Too few

points may be within the half-width w = 3, thus not allowing

a sufficient sampling of the field. The result, then, of continuation may be poor. In this case the half-width is increased to

reach a sufficient sampling of the field.

It is important to note in equation (14) that the elements

of g depend on the choice of the zero topographic level. If

we consider the simple coordinate transformation z = Z + zo,

where zo is the new zero topographic level, we can rewrite

446

Fedi et al.

factor. Courtillot et al. (1978) interpreted this effect as smoothing. They pointed out that a choice of zo is equivalent to the

choice of a physical filter and that the greater zo, the stronger

the smoothing of t (r). We find, instead, that the effect of the

choice of zo is not generally equivalent to a simple smoothing

and must be studied carefully. In particular, we find that the

scaling effect occurs only for regularly spaced data on a flat

surface, since, in this case, matrix g has the same elements at

every point far enough from the borders. When scattered data

points on an irregular surface are considered, the effect is more

complex and can no longer be considered as a simple scaling.

Note the distribution of the eigenvalues of g for the two

cases of Figure 3a (Figure 3b). There is an apparent contradiction between the good conditioning of g and the poor result

of continuation in the case of Z = 0.1 km. Since the sampling

of the field is the same in both cases, one might expect a better result from this more stable case. This can be explained as

follows.

When Z << wh, the values of the line elements of g are peaked

around the value of the diagonal elements. Since g is nearly diagonal, its eigenvalues are nearly equal and g 1 is diagonal as

well. Moreover, the values of function H in equation (17) are

peaked around the value calculated at point P i right below

point P, where continuation is required (see Figure 2). Thus,

only the diagonal elements of g 1 , corresponding to points

immediately around Pi , contribute significantly to the sum in

equation (10). Under these circumstances g is well conditioned,

but the effective sampling of the field is not sufficient to allow

a good continuation.

When Z increases, the values of the elements of g are not

peaked any more and the elements of g' are equally weighted

in equation (17) by the functions H. The matrix g is more poorly

conditioned (see the curve for Z = 1.5 km in Figure 3b), but the

sampling of the field is sufficient to achieve good results.

If Z>> wh, some rows of g may become nearly equal, so that

the matrix may become numerically singular. This situation

must be avoided.

When real data are considered, the choice of the optimum

value of zo can be made as follows. Since the continuation

equation (14) as

r,)

Downloaded 03/25/15 to 169.230.243.252. Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use at http://library.seg.org/

ZI + Z j + 2zo

2n [(xi x1) 2 + (yr y.i) 2 + (Z1 + Z 1 + 2zo) 2 ]

3/2

(22)

Consider the situation shown in Figure 2. A 1-km homogeneous cube with density of 4 g/cm 3 is centered 2.1 km below a

16 x 16-km grid of 0.4 km spacing. The gravity field is known

at the grid points, and continuation is performed along a profile parallel to a side of the grid passing through the center

of it, as shown in Figure 2. In this case Z, = Z j = Z for every i and j. In Figure 3a the results for Z=0.1 km (i.e., for

zo = 3 km) and Z =1.5 km (i.e., for zo =1.6 km) are shown.

While for Z =1.5 km the result of the continuation is highly

satisfactory, for Z = 0.1 km the continued profile lies well under the curve representing the exact result. In particular, it ap-

1 lrm

Zo

zero level zo on the continuation. The 16 x 16-km and 0.4-km

spacing grid is at height Z with respect to zo. If z is the height

of the grid with respect to the ground, the equality z = zo + Z

holds. The source is a homogeneous cube of density 4 g/cm 3

centered below the grid. The width w is the half-width of the

continuation operator, and h = 0.5 km is the distance of continuation. Point Pi is a grid point. The continuation is required

at point P.

Z=0.1

km

3.5

Z=0.1 km b)

----- Z=1.5km

....................

2.5

.^+

a)

0.75

----- Z=1.5km

exact' \

I

i

'.

0.5

1.5

on

0.25

0.5

.d

.Y

v'C.`

0

0

distance (km)

12

16

10

20

30

40

FIG. 3. (a) Continued field at height Z + h along a profile parallel to the side of the grid passing through the center of the grid of

Figure 2 for Z = 1.5 km (dashed line) and Z = 0.1 km (solid line). The dotted line represents the exact values of the continued

anomaly. (b) Normalized eigenvalues for the same values of Z. The eigenvalues are numbered and ordered in descending order.

points, a synthetic model can be built to generate a data set of

the field calculated at data point locations. The upward continuation of the synthetic data set and the rms error of the

continuation can be calculated for several values of zo. The

optimum choice of zo corresponds to the value that minimizes

the rms error (see example in Figure 9b). In our experience

in areas where the average density of data points is not lower

than one or two points per square kilometer, the optimum step

of search for zo is 0.1 km. Also, for scattered data the optimum

zo rarely exceeds 0.6 km below the height of the lowest data

point, so the number of steps needed to find the optimum zo is

limited.

CONTINUATION OF GRIDDED AND SCATTERED DATA

Having a method to perform direct continuation of irregularly spaced data is important because interpolation may, under

certain conditions, bias in an unpredictable fashion the results

of continuation. We previously pointed out that interpolation is

commonly performed using 2-D methods. Generally speaking,

potential fields are functions f (x, y, z) of three spatial coordinates. The 2-D interpolation algorithms can handle only functions f*(x, y) and ignore the vertical coordinate z. Moreover,

the errors resulting from the interpolation of an uneven sampled field are likely to vary over the resulting grid, being higher

where there are too few data. In other words, the interpolation

errors spread over the grid in an unpredictable fashion. We

now turn to a synthetic example.

Consider the model shown in Figure 4. The source under the

topographic relief is a 1.5 x 1.5 x 2.3-km homogeneous prism,

and its top is 0.7 km above ground level. Its density contrast is

0.4 g/cm 3 . The sources below the depressions are 1.5-km homogeneous cubes with a density contrast of 0.35 g/cm 3 and top at

Contour interval of the topography is 0.1 km. The gravity field,

not shown in the figure, is sampled along the labeled profiles

with spacing of about 0.4 km, yielding a set of 199 data points.

447

1.5-km homogeneous prism with a density contrast of

0.35 g/cm 3 and a top at 0.1 km below ground level. Seven profiles are shown, along which the gravity anomaly is sampled

with a 0.4-km spacing, yielding 199 data points. We interpolated these data using kriging and minimum curvature, obtaining two sets of 961 data each on a regular grid of 12 x 12 km and

a spacing of 0.4 km. For each of the three data sets, we computed

the upward continuation to a height of 1.2 km above ground

level along the profiles. For the noninterpolated data we chose

w = 5 and zo = -0.6 km; for the gridded data we chose w = 3

and z o = -0.5 km. To determine the optimum zo we followed

the procedure outlined in the previous section. Note that the

value zo = - 0.6 km is related to the rather large value of w

used. The value of w also influences the dimension of the Gram

matrix g. For the noninterpolated data the maximum dimension is 65, but on the border the dimension falls to about five.

The dimension of g is also very sensitive to the distribution of

points. For example, for the interpolated data the maximum

dimension is about 214, but we have found Gram matrices of

dimension up to 500.

Figure 5 shows continuation results along four of the profiles.

The effect of poor sampling of the field is seen in profile 4 (Figure 5a). The data point density is not sufficient to let the kriging

exactly reproduce the field because of the two sources situated

along the profile. The result of continuation using minimum

curvature is also shown. The difference between the curves

obtained using kriging and minimum curvature interpolated

data is evident. We found that, along all the profiles, continuation performed using data interpolated by minimum curvature

is always poorer than continuation performed using data interpolated by kriging. Thus, in the following figures only the curve

obtained using kriging interpolated data is shown. This example shows that, depending on the distribution of the points, different interpolators may give different results. This complicates

the procedure of both interpolation and continuation because

it is impossible to determine which interpolator is more suitable. The advantage of a continuation method dealing directly

with scattered data is obvious.

Profile 3 (Figure 5b) has the same problem. A lack of sampling occurs at the points around the middle of the profile; the

maximum difference between the continuation of the two data

sets occurs at those points. Since the distribution of the eigenvalues is similar along the profile, this disagreement must be

because of interpolator error.

The same conclusion can be drawn for profile 5 (Figure 5c).

The rapid variation of the field is not sufficiently sampled, so

the interpolator introduces errors that distort the continuation.

This is not the case for continuation performed on noninterpolated data.

Continuation is performed well for both data sets along profile 1 (Figure 5d). However, even here the noninterpolated data

result is slightly better. This profile cuts the main topographic

feature of the model, but note that the sampling within the

half-width w increases toward the top of the relief. Moreover,

the field has a near-radial symmetry around it. Thus, the data

on profile 1, as well as the data on profile 7, are sufficient for

the interpolator to reproduce the field well.

To evaluate the stability of our continuation method, we

added to the signal an independent Gaussian noise whose standard deviation is 10% of the datum value. Data <0.1 mGal are

448

Fedi et al.

for profile 3 are shown in Figure 6. As expected, noise introduces some difference between the results, but in the worst

case the disagreement is 5-8%. A difference >10% was found

at only three points, located at the border of the survey area

where there is poor data sampling. The differences are rarely

>5%.

surface.

Using this upward continuation process, we must choose the

optimum zero vertical level. As previously pointed out, we

take advantage of the fact that the continuation operator of

equation (19) is independent of the measured data. Thus, we

can use a synthetic model to find all the information needed;

then we apply the results to the measured data.

Note that the synthetic model can be chosen at will because

the continuation operator depends only on the position of data

points and on the continuation surface. Therefore, even if the

map of the measured data shows numerous anomalies, it is sufficient to consider a simple synthetic anomaly distribution for

seeking the optimum zero level. Figure 8 shows the anomaly

has two main minima, corresponding to the crater zone and

Colle Umberto. We used a synthetic model, made up of two

FIELD EXAMPLE

We applied our continuation method to a set of 383 gravity measurements collected at Mt. Vesuvius, Italy, during 1994

(Bruno et al., 1994). Topographic relief and station locations

are shown in Figure 7. The Bouguer anomaly map is shown in

Figure 8. To show that our method can be applied when the

continuation surface is irregular, the station Bouguer anomaly

1.75

I a)

__ -_

profile 4

1.5

2.5

min cum

. 1.25

b)

2 profile 3

aging

1.5

exact

0.75

0.5

0.5

0.25

0

-{ topography

1 topograf

0.5

0.5

0

0

1.25

distance (km)

12

12

12

distance (km)

d)

profile 1

c)

1 profile 5

0.75

eo

0.5

0.25

YI

0.5

0.5

[.

0

FIG. 5.

distance (km)

12

Continuation of the gravity data defined by the synthetic model of Figure 4 to a height of 1.2 km above ground level. (a)

Gravity along profile 4. Squares represent the interpolated and continued data using kriging; triangles represent the interpolated

and continued data using minimum curvature; diamonds represent the noninterpolated continued data; and circles represent the

exact values. (b) Gravity along profile 3. (c) Gravity along profile 5. (d) Gravity along profile 1. Below each figure, the topography

along the profile is plotted.

3

0

exact

2.5

Downloaded 03/25/15 to 169.230.243.252. Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use at http://library.seg.org/

,/Pk%

21.5

^ 1

0.5

topography

Z 0.5

12

distance (km)

FIG. 6. Continuation of noninterpolated data with noise.

Crosses represent the continuation of data with a Gaussian

noise whose standard deviation is 10% of the datum value. For

the other symbols, Figure 5.

449

prisms, that reproduces these two minima (Figure 9a). Upward continuation of the synthetic data set was computed for

several values of zero topographic level. The calculated rms

error results are shown in Figure 9b. We chose zo = 0.3 km

above sea level, which corresponds to the minimum rms

value.

We performed a standard eigenvalue analysis and found that

a condition number of 4000 is a good average value, even when

in some zones (like Colle Umberto) a greater value can be

used. The result of continuation is shown in Figure 10a. To

assess the goodness of our calculation, we again exploited the

synthetic model. We continued the synthetic field using the

same conditioning as before, and we determined the residuals

between calculated and exact field (Figure 10b). The maximum

error is concentrated in the northwestern part of the data set,

while the field in the crater zone is generally well resolved.

Since we cannot determine the experimental error, we cannot

assess its effect on the continuation as we did in the previous

section (see Figure 6).

CONCLUSION

We have developed a method for upward continuation of

scattered 3-D potential field data. The importance of having

a method for upward continuation of scattered data resides

in the fact that interpolation of data may introduce wrong information into the gridded data set. The errors are mainly the

FIG. 7. Location of data points of the gravity survey of Mt. Vesuvius (from Bruno et al., 1994, modified). During 1994, 383 gravity

measurements were collected. Shaded in the center of the figure is the crater; the topographic high northwest of it is Colle Umberto.

Mt. Somma can be recognized in the northernmost part of the figure. The contour interval is 50 m. On the axis are the distances

(kilometers) from the 14E longitude meridian (horizontal axis) and the 4040' N latitude parallel (vertical axis).

450

Fedi et al.

the data of Figure 7. The contour interval is 1 mGal.

FIG. 8.

FIG. 9.

the chosen grid spacing may be inadequate.

The method we developed is based on a continuation operator that has a local character, so it can operate only on a subset

of the data. Hence, it is numerically efficient. Its performance

on scattered data without noise is highly satisfactory. We also

tested it using data with superimposed Gaussian noise whose

standard deviation is equal, at each point, to the 10% of the datum without noise. The method was found stable, giving results

to within 5 to 8% of data without noise.

The field application shows that the dependence of the continuation operator on the zero topographic level can be optimized with the use of a synthetic model. If an estimate of the

data error is known, it is possible to find the best conditioning

at every data point with the same synthetic model. This conditioning can in turn be applied to the continuation of field

data. Otherwise, a standard eigenvalue analysis must be carried out, but the synthetic model can again be used to assess

the goodness of the continuation.

(a) Synthetic field used to evaluate the optimum zero level. The contour interval is 0.3 mGal. (b) The rms of the continuation

of synthetic data for various values of the zero level, Z.

(a) Continuation of real data on a surface parallel to the topographic surface at 0.2 km. The contour interval is 1 mGal.

(b) Map of the residuals between the continued synthetic data calculated with the same conditioning as (a) and the exact data. The

contour interval is 0.1 mGal.

FIG. 10.

REFERENCES

Achache, J., Abtout, A., and Le Mouel, J. L., 1987, The downward

continuation of Magsat crustal anomaly field over Southeast Asia:

J. Geophys. Res., 92, 11584-11596.

Backus, G., and Gilbert, F., 1968, The resolving power of gross earth

data: Geophys. J. Roy. Astr. Soc., 16, 169-205.

1970, Uniqueness in the inversion of inaccurate gross earth

data: Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, 266,123-192.

Bhattacharyya, B. K., and Chan, K. C., 1977, Reduction of gravity and

magnetic data on an arbitrary surface acquired in a region of high

topographic relief: Geophysics, 42,1411-1430.

Bruno, E E G., Carrara, E., Cella, E, Dorre, A. S., Fedi, M., Florio, G.,

Grimaldi, M., Lamberti, S., Rapolla, A., Roberti, N., 1994, Progetto

Vesuvio: Contributi preliminari delle indagini gravimetriche e primi

risultati del test di sismica a riflessione: Presented at the Ann. General Assembly, Gruppo Nazionale per la Vulcanologia, Consiglio

Nazionale delle Ricerche.

Cordell, L., 1992, A scattered equivalent-source method for interpolation and gridding of potential field data in three dimensions: Geophysics, 57, 629-636.

Courtillot, V., Ducruix, J., and Le Model, J. L.,1973, Le prolongement

d'un champ de potentiel d'un contour quelconque sur un contour

horizontal: Ann. Geophys., 29, 361-366.

1978, Inverse methods applied to continuation problems in geophysics in Applied inverse methods: Sabatier, P. C., Ed., SpringerVerlag, Berlin.

451

34, 39-53.

Ducruix, J., Le Model, J. L., and Courtillot, V., 1974, Continuation of

three-dimensional potential fields measured on an uneven surface:

Geophys. J. Roy. Astr. Soc., 38, 299-314.

Graber-Brunner, V., Klingele, E., and Marson, I., 1991, An improved

solution for the problem of upward continuation of gravity field data

in rugged topography: Bollettino di Geofisica Teorica e Applicata,

33,135-144.

Hansen, R. 0., and Miyazaki, Y.,1984, Continuation of potential fields

between arbitrary surfaces: Geophysics, 49, 787-795.

Henderson, R. G., and Cordell, L., 1971, Reduction of unevenly spaced

potential field data to a horizontal plane by means of finite harmonic

series: Geophysics, 36, 856-866.

Jackson, D. D., 1972, Interpretation of inaccurate, insufficient and inconsistent data: Geophys. J. Roy. Astr. Soc., 28, 97-197.

Parker, R. L., 1977, Understanding inverse theory: Ann. Rev. Earth

Planet. Sci., 5, 35-64.

Parker, R. L., and Klitgord, K. D., 1972, Magnetic upward continuation

from an uneven track: Geophysics, 37,662-668.

Pilkington, M., and Urquhart, W. E. S., 1990, Reduction of potential

field data to a horizontal plane: Geophysics, 55, 449-455.

Xia, J., and Sprowl, D. R., 1991, Correction of topographic distortion

in gravity data: Geophysics, 56, 537-541.

Xia, J., Sprowl, D. R., and Adkins-Heljeson, D., 1993, Correction of

topographic distortion in potential field data: A fast and accurate

approach: Geophysics, 58, 515-523.

- Comparison of Spatial Interpolation Methods for Precipitation in Ningxia, ChinaDiunggah olehIjsrnet Editorial
- Linear Interpolation With ExcelDiunggah olehkktung
- Akkala 2010Diunggah olehOswaldo Abad
- WhatsNew.rtfDiunggah olehRiki Nursetiyadi
- Morris County NJ FIRM: Panel 229FDiunggah olehMorris County NJ
- Topographic Map of WiedDiunggah olehHistoricalMaps
- 1012 Oil ReportDiunggah olehGreg Jaklewicz
- Map Maker Pro GuideDiunggah olehJohn Victor
- Topographic Map of BlandDiunggah olehHistoricalMaps
- Checking Arbitrage in Implied Vol Using the RNDDiunggah olehEtienne Bédelpet
- How to Report on Cross Company Stock in Transit.pdfDiunggah olehPatel BO
- Survey ReportDiunggah olehHarish Nagabatla
- sdarticleDiunggah olehRajib Chowdhury
- Function ApproximationDiunggah olehShraddha_90
- NMDiunggah olehNIlesh Bhagat
- Final Residential EffectDiunggah olehNicholas Spalt
- Topographic Map of Richland SpringsDiunggah olehHistoricalMaps
- OF2010-4Diunggah olehcarlos
- manual adsDiunggah olehAndré Lapa
- ds691Diunggah olehJhessykha Gutierrez Quenta
- lec35Diunggah olehKhairy Elsayed
- Topographic Map of SchulenburgDiunggah olehHistoricalMaps
- Topographic Map of Hedwig VillageDiunggah olehHistoricalMaps
- Topographic Map of Pearsons ChapelDiunggah olehHistoricalMaps
- Math471 Chapter 5Diunggah olehmohamed fanouch
- Topographic Map of QuinlanDiunggah olehHistoricalMaps
- V12Diunggah olehpropernoun
- Design ReviewDiunggah olehAr Sanjay
- mcqsuniti-v-150813122121-lva1-app6892Diunggah olehmsurfudeen6681
- Student Lecture 29 Eigenvalues and EigenvectorsDiunggah olehuploadingperson

- Archaeological implications of a widespread 13th Century tephra marker across the central Indonesian ArchipelagoDiunggah olehAlutsyahLuthfian
- QUARTZ-RICH SANDY FACIES BEHIND THE MIOCENE VOLCANIC ACTIVITY IN SOUTH EAST JAVA: INSIGHT FROM SANDSTONE CHARACTERISTICS WITHIN JATEN FORMATIONDiunggah olehAlutsyahLuthfian
- Kamojang GeothermalDiunggah olehAlutsyahLuthfian
- Jurnal MagnetikDiunggah olehAlutsyahLuthfian

- airport.docxDiunggah olehdereje buruse
- Geometry Are You ReadyDiunggah olehBryant Bachelor
- A Textbook for Advanced Calculus - John Boller & Paul J. Sally, Jr.Diunggah olehliza
- NumericalIntegration.pdfDiunggah olehAshok Kumar K
- Mathematical treatise on linear AlgebraDiunggah olehJonathan Mah
- CLASS_XDiunggah olehAdarsh Raj
- LU HW2 SolutionsDiunggah olehbhagwat26
- solnwdescDiunggah olehJose Leandro Feliciano
- algebra 2Diunggah olehapi-298956964
- Maths 4U 1968 HSC.pdfDiunggah olehKingom 885
- Mae 331 Lecture 9Diunggah olehAli Akbar
- Minggu 2 1 Engineering Mathematics Differential EquationsDiunggah olehhjgajjar
- Principal Paper IDiunggah olehSWETHA LATHA
- Selariu Super-Mathematics FunctionsDiunggah olehAnonymous 0U9j6BLllB
- Shooting MethodDiunggah olehKrish Pavan
- N. Arkani-Hamed, J. Bourjaily, F. Cachazo, A. Hodges and J. Trnka- A Note on Polytopes for Scattering AmplitudesDiunggah olehSteam29
- notes.pdfDiunggah olehRon
- 02RootFinding.pptDiunggah olehgundulp
- Solu2Diunggah olehnikolaimuthama
- FS GM Lesson PlanDiunggah olehcrisna
- Grade 11 Math Test OntarioDiunggah olehHeather
- CE50P Lecture 1Diunggah olehJohn Alex Blancaflor
- Assignment 3 SolutionsDiunggah olehAndrianMelmamBesy
- HyperbolaDiunggah olehAngelo Luigi Yasay
- laplace transforms.pdfDiunggah olehSupriya Anand
- Fibonacci SequenceDiunggah olehHaziq Shaf
- Permutation and Combinations1Diunggah olehMM_AKSI
- lcm hcfDiunggah olehImmanuel Rathinakumar
- MIT18_02SC_SupProb2.pdfDiunggah olehMahmoud Asem
- Chapter 3 SurfacesDiunggah olehXi Wang