White Paper:
Fast Analysis
of Acoustic Resonators
for the Rapidly Growing
Premium RF Filter Market
Introduction
Acoustic resonator filters have been used in cell phones since the early
2G wireless standard. Now, typical smart phones employ thirty (30) or more
filters as mobile carriers push to support more and more data bands as well as
Wi-Fi, Bluetooth and GPS. Market pressure for these RF filters to be compact
and inexpensive, yet meet the higher performance requirements of the 4G
standards, has spurred great interest in novel filter design concepts that further
miniaturize the transmit/receive chain of RF frontends The first successful filters
were surface acoustic wave (SAW) filters, but in the past few years the number
of bulk acoustic wave (BAW or FBAR) filters within a handset has grown rapidly
to fill the market demand above 1 GHz where SAW device performance
degrades (see [Aigner] for technical details, and [Hettenbach] for market
analysis). Most recently, bulk mode resonators that vibrate in plane to allow
multi-frequency filters on one substrate have garnered significant interest within
the research community. These in-plane bulk-mode resonators come by various
names such as contour-mode resonators (CMR) and laterally-vibrating
resonators (LVR).
Until now, simulation tools were not able to provide an accurate, detailed
frequency response for these filters in a practical amount of time. This limited a
designers ability to explore many design concepts or mitigate the effect of nonidealities in the design, such as spurs in the frequency response. The designer
typically simplified the simulations in order to get results in a reasonable amount
of time. The simplifications involved reducing the simulation geometry to a 2D
cross section (even though most devices exhibit 3D effects) and/or reducing the
number of frequency points simulated. Both of these simplifications risk missing
important features of the response, as is shown in this white paper.
Coventor has overcome the limitations of the conventional simulation
approach with the recent release of the FastPZE module in CoventorWare 10. In
this paper, we show that the new FastPZE module is 30 times faster than
competing techniques for computing the detailed frequency response of a
3D Lithium Niobate LVR described in [Gong13]. The FastPZE simulations
provide the admittance response over a broad frequency range in minutes rather
than many hours. For instance, Figure 1 shows the frequency response for the
LVR computed using a conventional approach with a limited number of frequency
points to make the simulation finish in a practical amount of time. Crucial
features of the frequency response, such as the frequency of the peak response
and presence of spurs are not captured precisely. In contrast, the result from
FastPZE accurately resolves these features to give true guidance to the
designer.
Many simulation tools provide only the frequency response to a single set
of voltage stimuli. Unfortunately, this frequency response does not provide
metrics to guide design nor does it enable simulation with RF circuit simulators.
In contrast, the FastPZE module can automatically extract Butterworth VanDyke (BVD) component parameters from the frequency response to give the
motional RLC parameters and electromechanical coupling coefficient, 2 as
shown in Figure 2. Also, for multiport resonator systems, the ports can be
defined and the n-port admittance parameters automatically computed. This
admittance, which includes all the non-idealities of a true design, can be
converted to n-port s-parameters and written to Touchstone format for
simulation in RF circuit simulators.
In this paper, we will provide more details related to the modeling of the
Lithium Niobate LVR. Note that other features important to resonator design
such as thermal coefficient of frequency (TCF), thermo-elastic damping
(TED), and anchor loss also can be simulated with the CoventorWare tool suite,
but are not covered in this paper.
Figure 2: FastPZE simulations results for LVR (blue) and automatically extracted BVD
response (red). The BVD parameters and electromechanical coupling are inset on the
bottom left.
As a final note before diving into the details, bear in mind that designs are
not necessarily constructed with Manhattan geometries (all edges at right angles
to each other). A design may consist of, for instance, arbitrary polygons or
curves. In some simulation tools, this would require a mesh made of
tetrahedrons. Unfortunately, since these are thin-film devices, this can lead to an
extremely large number of mesh elements and consequently very long simulation
times. CoventorWare, in contrast, provides very efficient meshing for thin-film
devices of non-Manhattan shape with straight or curved edges as shown in
Figure 3.
Figure 5: Excited 3D mode shape. Cross-sectional view (top), top view (bottom).
G
Figure 6: Given a mask layout and process description, CoventorWare automatically
generates a 3D solid model of the LVR.
Figure 7: Mesh on 3D model with 3114 parabolic hex elements (a), 12 elements per finger
pitch (b) to accurately capture the S0 Lamb wave mode.
Figure 9: Admittance computed from FastPZE. Green circles mark 4 spurs in the
frequency response that are in the measured data but only one is in the 2D analysis (see
Figure 10c of [Gong] for measured data and 2D analysis).
Volume
mesh
nodes
Degrees
of
Freedom
Frequency
points
~18k
67k
~90k
350k
CoventorWare
FastPZE module
1680
~7hrs
15 min
1900
~74hrs
2hrs 20min
(a)
(b)
Figure 12: 2-port S-parameters (a) and the corresponding Touchstone file (b)
Parametric Analysis
As an example of parametric analysis, we sweep the angle of the X-cut as
illustrated in Figure 13 to optimize the electromechanical coupling as is done in
[Gong13]. The sweep can be automated and the frequency responses plotted
together as shown in Figure 14
Figure 13: Three configurations of the resonator relative to fixed crystallographic axes for
various angles to Y+.
Conclusions
In this paper we have shown that the FastPZE module of CoventorWare
10 provides three unique capabilities that aid resonator designers in meeting
time-to-market demands:
References
[Aigner] R. Aigner, SAW, BAW and the future of wireless, EDN, May
2013, http://www.edn.com/design/wireless-networking/4413442/SAW--BAW-andthe-future-of-wireless
[Hettenbach] C. Hettenbach, Morgan Stanley Research. For summary,
see http://blogs.barrons.com/techtraderdaily/2013/11/25/avago-rf-filter-biz-tobenefit-from-cheap-smartphone-growth-says-morgan-stanley/
[Gong13] Songbin Gong and Gianluca Piazza, "Figure-of-Merit
Enhancement for Laterally Vibrating Lithium Niobate MEMS Resonators", IEEE
Transactions on Electron Devices, Vol. 60, No. 11, November 2013.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TED.2013.2281734
[Gong14] Songbin Gong and Gianluca Piazza, Monolithic MultiFrequency Wideband RF Filters Using Two-Port Laterally Vibrating Lithium
Niobate MEMS Resonators, IEEE Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems,
Vol. 23, No. 5, October 2014, p. 1188-1197.
[Kovacs] G. Kovacs, M. Anhorn, H. Engan, G. Visintini, and C. Ruppel,
Improved material constants for LiNbO3 and LiTaO3, in Proc. IEEE Ultrasonics
Symposium, Dec. 1990, Vol. 1, pp 435438.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ULTSYM.1990.171403
[CWPZE] Coventor, Inc. CoventorWare MEMS Design and Analysis
Tutorials and Piezoelectric Resonator Analysis, 2015.
http://www.coventor.com/mems-solutions/