www.iji-cs.

org

International Journal of Information and Computer Science (IJICS) Volume 3, 2014

doi: 10.14355/ijics.2014.03.011

Cultural Relics Health Evaluation Based on

Cloud Model Approved Analytic of Hierarchy
Process
Xiaohong Zhang 1,2, Huiqin Wang 3, Zhan Wang 4
School of Management,Xi'an University of Architecture And Technology, Xi'an, China; 2School of Communication
& Information Engineering,Xian University of Science & Technology,Xi'an, China;3School of Information &
Control Engineering,Xi'an University of Architecture & Technology ,Xi'an,China;4 Shaanxi Province Institute of
Cultural Relics Conversation and Restoration, Xi'an, China.
1

447973560@qq.com; 2whq463@263.com

*1

Abstract
Cultural relics health management includes healthy
monitoring ,healthy analysis,and health assessment,in which
the method and model structure of the assessment are the
most important aspect of the protection of cultural
relics.This paper builds the indication system of cultural
relics health, in consideration of the ontology state of the
cultural relics,disease state,heritage preservation the
environment and the security of cultural relics. The
improved evaluation methods of heritages health
assessment are put forward in this paper, the priority of
AHP replaced by cloud model calculates the coefficient
weight in the relics health evaluation model. At last,the
defferent health index of Tang shun Ling in three dates are
compared by the method.
Keywords
Cultural Relics; Heath Assessment; AHP; Cloud Model

Introduction
The conservation of heritage relies on diagnosis relies
on its current status and restoration interventions.
Therefore, it is based on various kinds of
investigations and analytical data[1].Although many
cultural relics administrative departments monitor the
environment and condition of cultural relics for many
unmovable cultural relics, but health assessment and
health assessment is still at the primary stage. At
present the research on the evaluation at home and
abroad, often using analytic hierarchy process,
multiple
regression
analysis
of
the
fuzzy
comprehensive evaluation method, and neural
network method.Dr. Chen has preserved the data of
collection to the Great Wall in the north of Shaanxi soil
sites, but also no health assessment of the overall
data[2];Mr. Wu is also aware of the health assessment
of cultural relics is of great significance to the
88

protection of cultural relics and research, but also did

not find a feasible method to try[3]. Professor Lu has
monitored the long-term of the Mogao Grottoes of
Dunhuang, has accumulated of a large number of
data, but only studied for the relations between the
local tourist amount and caves in CO 2 , nor on the
caves in the heritage body health condition for a
quantified analysis[4].These evaluation methods are
different aspects of the evaluation target and its
influence factors of uncertainty as an important role in
promoting the research of evaluation target. In the
aspect of Tang mausoleum stone cultural relics
protection,this paper will analaysis the cultural relics
protection data of Tangshun mausoleum in China,
after accumulating 2 years.It makes analysis on the
main factors through using the AHP to geological
disasters in the study area, considering the impact of
various factors, combined with the protection of
cultural relics experts, to evaluate the health status of
Tangshun mausoleum stone cultural relics.
Health Status Assessment Index System of
Cultural Relics
There are very different between health and biological
heritage health, a measure of cultural relics healthy is
not only on the form and characteristics of relics
ontology, but also including the environmental state of
preservation, considering the unexpected events such
as the geological disasters, man-made destruction of
cultural relics. Considering the comprehensive
aspects, health evaluation model is established
according to the cultural relics of Tangshun
mausoleum stone artifacts, as shown in figure 1.
From the cultural relics under the unmovable cultural
relics and cultural relics protection monitoring data,

International Journal of Information and Computer Science (IJICS) Volume 3, 2014

We can divide into 3 layers:

FIGURE 1 RELICS HEALTH EVALUATION INDEX SYSTEM

www.iji-cs.org

operations to approximate, not persuasive. In

addition, the cultural relics health factor with a precise
numerical objective membership on health risk level is
very difficult, the existing methods are usually
adopted subjective value or empirical formula to give
a degree of membership, this process leads to the
membership degree of uncertainty[4].
In view of this, the method of multi-level fuzzy
comprehensive evaluation using the improved cloud
model to construct the heritage health risk prediction
model, the key lies oin the evaluation set cloud model
cloud model, standard three aspects and the degree of
membership function of cloud model, cloud model,
each of which are with its corresponding expectations
(Ex), entropy (En) and hyper entropy (He)three digital
features to characterize, namely C (Ex, En, He).
Among these droplets (Ex) reflect the position of the
center of gravity, is health risk level[5].

1.The highest level A is the target layer, it is reasonable

to evaluate the health status of Tangshun mausoleum
stone cultural relics;
2.The middle layer (B) is the criterion layer, including:
the body of the cultural relics, artifacts state (B 1 )
diseases (B 2 ), heritage preservation of the environment
(B 3 ) and the safety of the cultural relics (B 4 );
3.The lowest layer (C 1 -C 21 ) includes project layer:
cultural relics, artifacts, age, cultural relics, defect
fracture scale, fractured, biological diseases, surface
weathering, settlement, air temperature, precipitation,
illumination, humidity, dew point, soil temperature,
soil humidity, wind speed, SO 2 concentration, CO 2
concentration, earthquake, flood and artificial the
theft.
Health Risk Assessment Model of Cultural
Relics Improved by Cloud Model
In the multilevel fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of
cultural relics health model, random and discrete
system is mainly reflected in the subjective opinion in
part. First of all, the impact of the factors in
determining the comparison judgment matrix, in order
to avoid expert personal experience and subjective
factors on the evaluation results, using the method of
group decision making needs to make a decision, but
the aggregation method of traditional expert score
only simple algebraic operations, but in fact each
expert score are inevitably exist fuzziness, randomness
and discreteness, the uncertainty between the
aggregation operation, using only simple algebraic

FIGURE 2 THE PROCESS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE

EVALUATION OF HERITAGE HEALTH RISK MODEL OF
MULTIPLE FUZZY CLOUD MODEL IMPROVED

Health risk influence factor weight and the

membership degree of central value respectively[6];
entropy (E n ) to describe the fuzziness and randomness
of cloud droplets, which reflects the health risk level,
health risk effects may range of factor weight and
membership degree; excess entropy (H e ) is entropy, is
used to describe the thickness of the cloud, mainly
reflects the degree of discrete droplets, respectively,

89

www.iji-cs.org

International Journal of Information and Computer Science (IJICS) Volume 3, 2014

said health risk level[7], health risk influence factor

weight and membership degree of deviation from the
center value. Improved health risks specific cultural
relics of multilevel fuzzy comprehensive evaluation
model by using the cloud model to realize the process
shown in figure 2.
In this paper, the cloud model scaling to construct the
judgment matrix, and then calculate the factor weight
of induced culture relics health risk by square root
method. Comparison of two two rows in the judgment
matrix elements are calculated, then obtains the
formula weights shown cloud expectations (Ex),
entropy (En) and hyper entropy (He) formula[8]:
1

=
Exi 0

Eni 0
=

Exi
=
Exi

n
n
Exij

j =1

n
n
Exij
i =1 j =1

ij

Eni
=
Eni

n
n Enij

j =1 E x

ij

n
n
n Enij
)2
Ex (

j =1
=i 1
=
j 1 Ex

ij

ij

=
Hei 0

Hei
=
Hei

n
Ex
j =1

ij

Heij n

j =1 E x

The cultural relics management department

determine the integrity of the artifacts, including
unexplained missing parts, but does not affect the
stability of the existing part of the heritage. Paul
Winter is complete, Heritage defect is defined as 1;
3) Heritage Fracture
Heritage
fractureindicates
relics
damaged
condition, mainly on the stability of the existing
heritage considerations, there is no obvious
fracture, better stability, and therefore is a cultural
break.

The value of the settlement, cracks, rust water, air

temperature, atmospheric humidity, rainfall, light
intensity, dew point, wind speed, CO 2
concentration, SO 2 concentration, soil temperature,
soil moisture and other parameters can be
completed every 10 minutes through the Heritage
Health Monitoring Network System a sample and
therefore need to be calculated as the average daily
input. Due to the large gap between the mean
range of different parameters, so do the
normalization processing for all the mean value
between 0-1.
5) Biological Diseases

ij

1
n

n n
n Heij
)2
Ex (

j =1
=i 1
=
j 1 Ex

ij

ij

Comprehensive Evaluation Results and

Analysis
According Tang Shunling East HAVEN monitoring
data, the monitoring data has been collected and
processed during September 1st, October 1st and
November 1 in 2013.
Operating Rules
1) Age of Relics
Given the age and cultural heritage into the health
of the reverse relationship, so that:
Age is less than 500 artifacts, relics Age entry is 3;
If artifacts age is between 500 and 1500, the age
relics term value is 2;
Age is greater than 1500 artifacts, relics Age value

90

2) Heritage Defect

4) Normalization Processing

n
Ex
j =1

of 1; Tang Shunling heritage with the age of 2;

Given by disease,the severity biological heritage

sector experts think existing biological disease less
severe, a value of 2;
6) Weathered Surface
The surface weathering, including cavities, crisp
base, is based on the surface area and severity
weathered joint decision, therefore, some experts
are given a value of 2;
7) Earthquake, Flood, Theft Man
Cultural heritage security issue is a serious health
condition affecting normal circumstances is 0, the
direct inclusion of the cultural health hazard ranks
when problems arise.
Establishment of Judgment Matrix
1) Establishment of A-B Judgment Matrix
According to the state heritage body system (B 1 ),
Heritage disease cases (B 2 ), cultural preservation of
the environment (B 3 ) and cultural security (B 4 ) the

International Journal of Information and Computer Science (IJICS) Volume 3, 2014

relative importance of the target layer, was AB

judgment matrix (shown in Table 1).
A
B1
B2
B3
B4

B1
1
1/3
1/2
1/2

B2
3
1
3/2
3

TABLE 4 B3-C JUDGMENT MATRIX

B2 C9
C9

TABLE 1 A-B JUDGMENT MATRIX

B3
2
2/3
1
1

B4
2
2/3
1
1

=
w1

a1 j
=

j =1

1*3* 2*
=
2

=
12 1.861

C 10 C 11 C 12 C 13 C 14

2/5

1 ( Aw )i
4.0404
=

n i =1 wi

W
0.208

3/2

1/2

3/2

1/2

3/2

0.083

2/3

4/3

1/3

2/3

2/3

0.126

C 12 5/2

3/2

3/2

1/2

3/2

0.083

C 13 5/4

2/3

0.041

C 14 5/3

2/3

2/3

1/3

1/3

2/3

2/3

0.126

0.041

C 16 5/2

3/2

1/2

3/2

1/2

3/2

0.083

C 17 5/3

2/3

2/3

1/3

1/3

2/3

2/3

0.126

C 18 5/2

3/2

1/2

3/2

1/2

3/2

0.083

max=3.204, CR=0<0.1

=
n 1

Therefore the judgment matrix are in good

agreement.
2) Establishment of Judgment Matrix B-C
BC judge to determine and calculate the feature
vector matrix (see Table2,3,4,5) according to the
same rules.
TABLE 2 B1-C JUDGMENT MATRIX

C2
2
2
3/2

C 10
1
3/2
1/2

C 11
2/3
1
1/3

C 12
2
3
1

W
0.333
0.500
0.167

max = 3 , CR=0<0.1

3) The Total Level Sorting

MAX n

C3
3
2/3
1

W
0.210
0.240
0.550

max = 3.0735 ,CR=0.063<0.1

TABLE3 B2-C JUDGMENT MATRIX

C5
2
1
2/3
1
2/3

2/5

As can be seen, all single sort of CR <0.1, each

judgment matrix consistency is considered
acceptable.

0.0104
= 0.003467
3
CI
RI = 0.89 , CR
= = 0.003895 < 0.1
RI

C4
1
1/2
1/3
1/2
1/4

3/5

3/5

test

Its consistency test results,

B2
C4
C5
C6
C7
C8
test

2/5

B4

Largest igenvalue,

test

C 15 C 16 C 17 C 18
1/5

2/3

C 19
C 20
C 21

w = (0.122, 0.424, 0.227, 0.227)

C1
1
1/2
1/3

3/5

TABLE 5 B4-C JUDGMENT MATRIX

After normalized feature vector obtained,

B1
C1
C2
C3

1/5

test

,=
w2 0.5373,,=
w3 1,=
w4 1 ,

=
CI

2/5

C 11 5/3

Similarly obtained

=
MAX

3/5

C 10 5/2

C 15

Calculated using the square root method of its

largest eigenvalues and eigenvectors as follows:

www.iji-cs.org

C6
C7
3
2
3/2
1
1
2/3
3/2
1
1
2/3
max=3, CR=0<0.1

C8
4
2
4/3
2
1

W
0.091
0.182
0.272
0.182
0.363

Obtained at the right is a set of elements in a layer

of an element and its weight vector. To finally get
the elements of each program especially for the
lowest sort of target weight, we need for the total
order. The total order is the same level as the
relative importance of all the factors that the target
layer (top) of the sort weights. The total order is
important right from top to bottom of the right to a
single criterion under heavy synthesis [9].
ABC matrix for the total order, Cw weighting
matrix for the AB and BC are the product of the
weight matrix, the ultimate target layer C layer
relative weighting factor Cw[10]. The results are
shown in Table 6.
The main indicators of age relics, artifacts defect,
cultural rupture, water, rust, cracks, biological
diseases, surface weathering, sedimentation, air
temperature, precipitation, light, atmospheric
humidity, dew point, soil temperature, wind speed,
soil
moisture,
SO 2
concentration,
CO 2
concentration, value earthquakes, floods, and other
man-stealing in Table 7.
This paper uses the normalized method of the
relative value of interval to process the data as the
formula(1):

91

www.iji-cs.org

International Journal of Information and Computer Science (IJICS) Volume 3, 2014

X
i (j) =(X i (j) - minX i (j))/(max j X i (j) - min j X i (j)) .

The result is displayed in table 8.

After calculation, the three-day health index values
can know thatthe maximum value for the rainy
day, health risk index is the worst at the first day of
the three days.
TABLE 6 A-C TOTAL SORT OF JUDGMENT MATRIX

B1

B2

B3

B4

(Cw)

C1

0.210

0.02562

C2

0.240

0.0504

C3

0.550

0.132

C4

0.091

0.038584

C5

0.182

0.077168

C6

0.272

0.115328

C7

0.182

0.077168

C8

0.363

0.033033

C9

0.208

0.047216

C 10

0.083

0.047216

C 11

0.126

0.018841

C 12

0.083

0.028602

C 13

0.041

0.018841

C 14

0.126

0.009307

C 15

0.041

0.028602

C 16

0.083

0.009307

C 17

0.126

0.018841

C 18

0.083

0.028602

C 19

0.333

C 20

0.500

0.075591
0.1135

C 21

0.167

0.037909

TABLE7 TABLE THREE-DAY AVERAGE

92

Item

1/9/2013

10/1/2013

Age of relics

1/11/2013
2

Heritage defect

Heritage fracture

Water rust

Fracture

0.01327

0.01313

0.0128

Biological disease

Surface weathering

Settlement

0.156

0.159

0.153

Atmospheric
temperature

25.6

25.28

7.2

Precipitation

14.7

3.0

Illumination

5902.01

29671

30336.2
71.2

humidity

98.83

80.64

Dewpoint

17.98

11.34

1.32

Soil temperature

26.39

24.6

21.63

Wind velocity

0.728

0.395

0.39

Soil moisture

19

18.56

17.89

SO2 Concentration

0.23

0.41

0.18

CO2 Concentration

634

598

638

Earthquake

Flood

Artificial theft

TABLE8 DATA NORMALIZED RESULTS

Item

1/9

10/1

1/11

Age of relics

Heritage defect

Heritage fracture

Water rust

Fracture

0.702

Biological disease

Surface Weathering

Settlement
Atmospheric
temperature
Precipitation

0.5

0.983

0.204

Illumination

0.97278

Atmospheric humidity

0.3416

Dewpoint

0.6122

Soil temperature

0.6239

Wind velocity

0.0148

Soil moisture

0.6036

SO 2 Concentration

0.2174

CO 2 Concentration

0.9

Earthquake

Flood

Artificial theft

Conclusions
This paper designs the the multilevel fuzzy
comprehensive evaluation of cultural relics health
model improved by cloud model, whichi can reduce s
the the subjective opinion in part. In use of the
techonogy of the internet of things,this method
calculates monitoring data of the heath influence
factors ,and uses the cloud model to evaluated the risk
indcator to the Tangshun Ling.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT

This paper is
items,including:

supported

by

some

foundation

1 National Technology Support Project of the Ministry

of Science and Technology during the Twelfth Five
Year Plan (ID:2012BAK14B01) ;
2 National Ministry of education, the Returned
Overseas Students Science and Technology Support
Project (ID:K05055);
3 Xi'an University of Science and Technology
ResearchCultivation Project (ID:201256) .
4.Scientific Research Fund of Hebei
Education Department. (ID: QN2014334)

Provincial

REFERENCES

De Brito LMPL, Peralta LMR, Santos FES, eta. Wireless

International Journal of Information and Computer Science (IJICS) Volume 3, 2014

www.iji-cs.org

Sensor Networks Applied to Museums Environmental

Paola Gullino, Federica Larcher. Integrity in UNESCO

Monitoring[C]. Fourth International Conference on

World Heritage Sites. A comparative study for rural

Wireless and Mobile Communications 2008: 364-369

landscapes. Journal of Cultural Heritage 14(2013):389

F. Necati Catbas, Ricardo Zaurin, Mustafa Gul et al.Sensor

395.

Networks, Computer Imaging, and Unit Influence Lines

Peng Yu, Jang Hee Lee.A hybrid approach using two-level

for Structural Health Monitoring: Case Study for Bridge

SOM and combined AHP rating and AHP/DEA-AR

Load Rating[J].Journal of bridge engineering 17(2012):

method for selecting optimal promising emerging

662-670.

technology.Expert

Fengwei Li, Kok Kwang Phoon, Xiuli Du et al. Improved

Systems

with

Application

40(2013):300-314.

AHP Method and Its Application in Risk Identification.

Qiang Zou, Jianzhong Zhou, Chao Zhou. Comprehensive

Journal of construction engineering and management 139

Flood Risk Assessment based on Set Pair Analysis-

(2013): 312-320.

Variable Fuzzy Sets Model and Fuzzy AHP.Stochastic

Huu Tuan Do, Shang-Lien Lo, Lan Anh Phan Thi et al.
Calculating of River Water Quality Sampling Frequency
by

the

Analytic

Hierarchy

Process

909-916.
Li-Jun Yan, Zong-Bin Li, Wen-Kui Xi et al. Group-based
product scheme-screening decision method based on
AHP

and

evidential

reasoning

theory.

International journal of production research 50 (2012):

133-159.
Liu Xin-rong; Sun Hui; Chen Xiao-jiang. Structural Analysis
and Monitoring for Secondary Lining of Doubled Arch
Tunnel in Loess. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical
Engineering. Beijing 27 (2005): 695-697.
M. C. Rodrguez-Snchez, S. Borromeo, Member, IEEE, and
J. A. Hernndez-Tamames.Wireless Sensor Networks for
Conservation and Monitoring Cultural Assets. IEEE
Sensors Journal 11( 2011): 1382-1387.

525-546.

(AHP)[J].

Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 185(2013):

fuzzy

Environmental Research and Risk Assessment 27 (2013):

Xiaohong Zhang, Female, 1978.10- ,

doctor, lecture. She works in School of
Communication
&
Information
Engineering, Xian University of Science
and Techonolgy, mainly reserchs the
internent of things including data
processing, data mining, security
managment.
Huiqin Wang, Female, 1970.5- , doctor director, profession.
She works in School of Information & Control Engineering,
Xi'an University of Architecture & Technology, mainly do
the research about information intellegence process and data
managemnt.
Zhan Wang, male, 1973.10- , Associate Research Fellow. He
works in Shaanxi Province Institute of Cultural Relics
Conversation and Restoration, and mainly research the
Conversation and Restoration of Cultural Relics by
information technology.

93