Retail Inventory
Quick Check
Answers:
1. c
2. a
3. b
4. d
5. b
6. d
7. b
8. a
9. b
10. b
(20-25 min.) E6-3
Req. 1
Golf Haven
Date
Nov 1
Nov 6
Nov 8
Purchases
Unit
Total
Quantity Cost
Cost
$68
$476
10
10
4
31
68
74
74
680
740
296
$2 192
$1 480
20
$74
Nov 17
Nov 30
Totals
FIFO
Cost of sales
Unit
Total
Quantity Cost
Cost
20
$1 480
Inventory on Hand
Unit
Total
Quantity Cost
Cost
17
$68
$1 156
10
68
680
10
68
680
20
74
1 480
10
6
6
74
74
740
444
$444
Journal
DATE
ACCOUNTS AND EXPLANATIONS
Nov
6 Cash (7 x $128)
Sales revenue
6 Cost of sales (7 x $68)
Inventory
POST.
REF.
DEBIT
896
896
476
476
1 480
2 560
17 Cost of sales
(10 x $68) + (10 x $74)
Inventory
CREDIT
1 480
2 560
1 420
1 420
30 Cash (4 x $128)
Sales revenue
512
296
512
296
(10-15 min.) E6-6
Req. 1
Jun 30
30
Journal Entry
ACCOUNTS AND EXPLANATIONS
Purchases:
Inventory
Accounts payable
Sales:
Accounts receivable ($76 000 x .81)
Cash ($76 000 x .19)
Sales revenue
DEBIT
CREDIT
46 000
46 000
61 560
14 440
76 000
Cost of sales
Inventory
38 000
38 000
Req. 2
BALANCE SHEET:
Current assets:
Inventory ($8 000 + $46 000 $38 000)
$16 000
INCOME STATEMENT:
Sales revenue
Cost of sales
Gross profit
$76 000
38 000
$38 000
(15-20 min.) E6-9
Reqs. 1, 2 and 3
FIFO
$1 080
16
10
26
LIFO
$1 080
AVERAGE
$1 080
780
910
840
$ 300
$ 170
$ 240
$70
Req. 4
The FIFO method results in the largest gross profit during times of increasing
inventory prices. This method will produce the lowest cost of sales.
(5 min.) E6-10
Req. 1
Journal
DATE
ACCOUNTS AND EXPLANATIONS
Jun
30 Cost of sales ($13 000 $12 800)
Inventory
POST.
REF. DEBIT CREDIT
200
200
Req. 2
According to the lower-of-cost-and-net-realisable-value rule, Eagle Resources
should report inventory on the 30 June balance sheet at $12 800.
(5 min.) E6-11
Req. 1
Journal
DATE
ACCOUNTS AND EXPLANATIONS
Mar.
31 Cost of sales ($18 000 $17 000)
Inventory
POST.
REF. DEBIT CREDIT
1 000
1 000
Req. 2
INCOME STATEMENT:
Sales revenue
Cost of sales
$45 000 + $1 000
Gross profit
$117 000
46 000
$ 71 000
2012
$139 000
$8 500*
76 000
$ 84 500
(17 000)
$120 000
$12 000
70 000
$ 82 000
(8 500)*
67 500
$71 500
23 000
$ 48 500
73 500
$46 500
18 000
$ 28 500
2013
Understated by $4 500
2012
Overstated by $4 500
(10-15 min.) E6-14
Req. 1
Beginning inventory..
Net purchases.
Cost of goods available ..
Estimated cost of sales:
Net sales revenue.....
Less: Estimated gross profit of 45%...
Estimated cost of sales...
Estimated cost of inventory destroyed...
$220 000
800 000
$1 020 000
$1 100 000
495 000
(605 000)
$415 000
Beginning inventory
Net purchases
Goods available for sale
Cost ratio
Less: Net sales
Ending inventory at retail
Ending inventory at cost
At Cost
25 000
100 000
125 000
0.41667
At Retail
50 000
250 000
300 000
-240 000
60 000
25 000
Focus on Ethics
Req. 1
Although this may or may not be viewed as an ethical issue, changing accounting
methods every year hurts a companys credibility, which makes it hard for the
company to borrow or raise money from outside investors. The question that arises
about such a company is: What does the business have to hide?
Req. 2
The comparability principle is violated. Unless the external auditor concurs with the
appropriateness of the change each year (highly unlikely), the change is a violation
of generally accepted accounting principles and the auditors opinion would be
qualified. Even if the auditor concurs with the change, the change will still be noted
in the auditors report of opinion in order to alert readers of the financial statements
to the change.
Req. 3
The companys various stakeholders could be harmed by excessive accounting
changes. It becomes difficult to tell what aspects of the companys financial results
are real and what parts are simply a result of changes in accounting methods.
Outsiders find it difficult to track the companys operating results and financial
position over time. Ultimately the company suffers because lenders will not want to
loan it money, and outsiders will be reluctant to invest in the business. This may
deprive the entity of needed funds and hurt its chances for success or survival.