If you have continuity in your programme it benefits the audience as well as the artists,
because they gain a totally different kind of visibility and are perceived differently in the
city's art scene.
What we often find, and among the international artists you see it too, is the distinction
between the author and the one who puts it on the stage. But it doesn't exist in that
sense here. They are people who tell stories about their daily lives, and who tackle
issues that affect them directly.
And they are the ones who convey those stories on stage. There isn't the negative
connotation of an actor's "service assignment" to present someone else's issues on
stage. And that is something that requires a different contextual approach.
There's challenges also for cultural politics, to see how ...when does cultural politics
follow a trend or tries to be ahead of a trend. I think here the new developments
...Let's put aside the word "trend" because it's too much fashionable.
But new really developments in making arts, like in ... For the theatre, it would be the
performance art, contemporary dance, the interdisciplinary collective working ...That for
this type of working, it's cultural policy reacts very, very slowly.
And also for this art it's even more difficult to find private funding or find, you know,
maybe also the support from a broader public sphere. Because we would say it's critical
art. So it's always question marks, because we talk a lot about it in my team:
"Is art always critical? Does it criticise society? Does it ask questions?"
So what we want from society is that it pays exactly the thing that criticizes it, or can
pull the rope, the carpet under its legs. And that's actually what a state that is at ease
with itself can do. You know, the idea of the joker at the court, right? The joker can
kind of say the truth about the king without ...The joker was still welcomed in a way.
They never said, "Okay, you're out ..." Normally you would end up getting fired. If at
some point there's a risk of bankruptcy, people are fired and they think it helps. But
that's nonsense.
Annemie Vanackere (Director):
We don't cater to demands. In a way, we ...The new forms would be offered, or
invented, or developed together with artists in the first place.
And ...But artists are part of a public too, you see, so the artists have ...or live in this
society and develop their new forms with or without us, you know?
So it would start there, and then we would go in dialogue with them and try to facilitate
or produce those works and think of the audiences, absolutely.
But it's that way and not the other way round, that we would say, ah people are like so
busy with their smartphones, let's think of a performance that's dealing with
smartphones.
That's like not my imagination or ... Yeah, it's going through ideas of artists, going
through ideas that we think are relevant, and there the relevance term is coming in
again.