Executive Summary
This report examines the principles of leadership used by modern western militaries,
such as the Canadian Forces (CF), and their potential application to the municipal
environment for developing a leadership training program. It asserts that organizations
should look beyond their traditional network of similar organizations when looking for
inspiration when developing their training programs.
This report outlines the evolution of leadership doctrine in modern militaries in broad
terms focusing on the evolution from a centralized to a decentralized leadership model.
It examines the militarys shifting focus of leadership to non-combat roles to meet the
realities of peacetime and an ever-expanding administrative branch.
This report establishes a broad definition of leadership which includes the concepts of
command, management, and mentorship. It evaluates the balance that must be
maintained between these three concepts in order to maintain effective leadership in
any organization. This report goes on to outline the principles of leadership that form
the basis of many modern western militaries leadership programs. It summarizes the
intent of each principal and describes how they can be applied in a municipal
organization.
The final sections of this report highlight the similarities of a modern military operating in
a non-combat environment, with that of a municipal government. It asserts that the
lessons learned by militaries over many centuries in developing leadership programs
can be applied with potentially great benefit to the municipality. It also highlights the
importance of developing and encouraging individual leadership in all staff to the benefit
of the organization.
Page | 2
Table of Contents
Executive Summary
Table of Contents
11
13
18
20
Conclusions
22
Bibliography
24
Page | 3
Page | 4
Page | 5
Leadership in any form must build on these most basic and natural tendencies. A
leader must understand that individuals tend to form groups naturally and seek
reasonable direction from others. An effective leader will recognize these desires and
build upon them rather than forcing their will upon the group. Many organizations, such
as modern militaries, have built on these concepts to create comprehensive leadership
programs that can be used in todays complex workplaces.
Most organizations realize the importance of first defining leadership before attempting
to evaluate or train their leaders. Nowhere is this more true than with modern western
militaries, such as the Canadian Forces (CF) which defines leadership as;
Leadership is the art of influencing human behavior so as to
accomplish a mission in the manner desired by the leader.
- Canadian Forces Definition of Leadership
Although this definition has evolved over time and many variations exist today, this
definition captures the essence of what leadership is. Leadership consists of two
equally important components. The first is the mission or goal either determined by the
leader or assigned to them by anther more senior person. This is the ultimate outcome
that the leader and team must work towards. The secondly equally important
component is the method in which the team will work toward the chosen outcome. This
method must be controlled by the leader to ensure all members of the team are working
effectively towards the same outcome. If either of these two components are missing,
then leadership is not present and the likelihood of the desired outcome being achieved
is significantly reduced.
Page | 6
Although the mission or goal is often outside the leaders control, the method in which
the leader choses to lead the group is often left up to the individual. Many methods
exist and their descriptions and naming can vary depending on the source and their
perspective. In general terms the leadership approach will range on a scale from freerein on one end to authoritative on the other.
A free-rein leadership style is characterized by minimal input by the leader. The leader
will ensure the group is informed of the ultimate outcome, but will generally leave it up to
the group to determine the method and coordination required to work towards this goal.
This approach can be effective in situations where the group is highly trained or where
the outcome is repetitive. Otherwise this approach can easily lead to confusion,
repetition, or inaction by group members.
The opposite end of the scale is an overtly authoritative approach. This approach is
characterized by the leader maintaining complete control of the actions by the group
members. The leader will not seek feedback from the group and the leader may even
refrain from disclosing all or part of the desired outcome. Although this approach can
be useful in intense situations, it will generally lead to resentment and poor performance
by the group if used too often.
The middle of the scale is a blend of the two approaches and is often referred to as a
participatory leadership approach. This approach is characterized by the mutual
exchange of information by both the leader and the group members. This includes
detailed information on the desired outcome by the leader as well as possible methods
to achieve the goal by the group members. However the ultimate responsibility to select
the chosen method of work rests with the leader. This leadership approach is intended
to encourage group participation while ensuring control is maintained by the leader.
Page | 7
Page | 8
The day the soldiers stop bringing you their problems is the
day you stopped leading them. They have either lost
confidence that you can help them or concluded that you do
not care. Either case is a failure of leadership. - Colin Powell
The Origins of Modern Military Leadership
The leadership and command style used in militaries has always been a direct result of
the military tactics used on the battlefield. From the centralized command structure that
accompanied large military formations before the twentieth century to that of the
decentralized command structure used in small unit tactics of the modern battlefield.
The origins of the Canadian military, for example, did not simply start on an arbitrary
day in history. Instead, it was a slow transition from the European model in the
nineteenth century. As a result, the early Canadian military inherited the same two
class structure used in all western militaries of the day. This system saw the separation
of the officers from the enlisted soldiers. The officers were expected to be educated
and most importantly from the upper classes of society often contributing financially to
garner a higher rank. The enlisted soldiers on the other hand were often conscripted
from the working class. They typically had little or no education and no financial
resources to influence a higher rank.
This division often led to mutual resentment between the two classes. It is well
documented that the officer class would maintain strict discipline through the threat of
brutal punishment, to the point where it is often assumed that the only reason the
enlisted class would fight was because they feared their officers more than the enemy.
Although history may overstate the true effect that harsh disciple may have had on the
average soldier, it can be said with some certainty that the average officer would be
viewed as commander and not as a leader. This centralized leadership model focused
on the executive and senior leaders and encouraged an authoritative leadership style.
Page | 9
The twentieth century saw the near constant evolution of military tactics, which lead to
fundamental shifts in the command and leadership approaches used by militaries. WWI
began to see the need for decentralized command as the use of massive formations of
concentrated soldiers proved to be outdated and ineffective. This period saw the rise of
the Non-Commissioned Officer (NCO) class, previously occupied by long serving
enlisted soldiers with little authority. This group encompasses the direct leaders in the
military and due to their close working relationship with the solders tended to be less
inclined to rely on a strictly authoritative leadership style. During WWII the NCO class
proved to be invaluable to western armies that saw the advantage and necessity of
having trained leaders able to independently and directly lead small groups of soldiers.
To facilitate this, western militaries designed training specifically for leadership at these
lower rank levels and thus began the modern leadership program
With the end of major conflicts many militaries, such as Canada, entered a new phase
in the late twentieth century. With more emphasis being place on peacekeeping and
humanitarian operations, it was becoming far more common for the average soldier to
complete their entire military career without ever seeing combat or even being deployed
to a combat region. The same time frame saw the steady increase of the administrative
trades within the military. This period saw an emphasis on developing military
leadership approaches that could be equally applied to non-combat environments such
as training or administrative environments and led to the general leadership slowly
moving away from a primarily authoritative style.
This evolution has resulted in a comprehensive leadership program that is taught to all
classes of military soldiers, to the point where even seniors officers are trained to be
leaders first and commanders second. The result is a modern military that works far
more collaboratively at all rank levels to ensure a proper balance between the demands
of the mission and the needs of the soldiers.
Page | 10
The final and equally important concept is Management. Management is the most
efficient and effective allocation of resources for the given goal. This includes both
physical resources as well as the proper selection of team members for each given role.
This approach is generally associated with a collaborative leadership style to allow for
effective communication, while maintaining control. A leader that is unable to properly
manage resources will see the overall productivity and moral of the team suffer.
These three terms are so fundamental to a team that it becomes difficult to describe a
team leader without using variations of one of the three terms. Unfortunately, this only
reinforces the imbalance with terms such as personal mentor, office manager, and
military commander becoming common place in modern society. With these terms
comes the assumptions that the individuals do not possess the other traits or the duty to
exercise these responsibilities associate with the other traits. Therefore, it must be
remembered that no matter what term is selected, or inherited, the three concepts must
be reinforced through balanced training.
Page | 12
Page | 13
Page | 14
Page | 15
Page | 16
or unproductive behavior in the team to ensure it does not spread and become deeply
rooted in the organizational culture.
Through all levels of military leadership training, the principles of leadership are set as
the focal point. Great lengths are taken to instill them as core concepts upon which all
other training is developed. This ensures that all leadership training is progressive and
inter-related. Although all leaders in the CF are trained to memorize each one in detail,
most will not find fault with those that carry the written principles on them at all times for
quick reference. With careers that span years or even decades it would be far too easy
for the high level of training to be forgotten without constant refresher training, which
would put a huge burden on the productivity of the entire organization. By engraining
these principles into the very culture of the organization it provides for a constant
reminder to the individual and each point quickly reminds the individual of the detailed
concepts that each one is based on. This ensures that the training delivered carries
more effectively through an entire career rather than be forgotten.
Page | 17
work in office environments, and many militaries are augmented by civilian personnel
that work alongside soldiers. It is these administrative environments which have striking
similarities to that of corporations and government agencies.
Even the positions within the organizations can be directly compared. The executive
leadership, whether it be senior officers in the military or directors in municipal
organizations are responsible for the overall organization by developing plans and
policies. Both sides are ultimately responsible to a group of elected officials, which can
have limited understanding of their organizations. The administrative personnel,
whether it be military clerical staff or municipal staff, are responsible for the day-to-day
implementation of the plans and policies set by the senior leaders. The front-line
personnel, whether it be combat soldiers or first responders, are tasked with dealing
with the difficult and dangerous situations that few others would like to or be able to deal
with. Finally, the support personnel, whether it be aircraft mechanics or public works
laborers, have the responsibility to make sure critical equipment and infrastructure is
maintained.
Page | 19
Page | 20
This comprehensive plan will ensure that the leadership potential of the organization is
maximized, which will encourage higher employee retention, reducing the need to
attract outside leadership candidates, and ensuring the highest levels of leadership from
staff at all levels.
Page | 21
Page | 22
special attention paid to the principles of leadership, which form the basis of the
program. This will allow the municipality to develop a program that does not merely
focus initial training of new leaders, but to also focus on the continued promotion of
effective leadership traits throughout their leaders careers.
However, It is not the intention of this report to suggest that the military principles of
leadership should be used verbatim as the basis of a radically new municipal leadership
program. Rather it should be used to highlight the value of the experience other
organizations have in developing successful leadership programs. Even though these
organizations may seem fundamentally different in the way they are structured or
operate, the reality is that they deal with the same types of people trying to deal with
similar types of organizational goals. Therefore, the only limit on the available material
and experience is that imposed by the individual or organization searching for it. The
true value that military training programs offers is evidenced by the way in which
portions of it have migrated into many other organizations, even without due credit or
appreciation to their origins.
Page | 23
Bibliography
Australia. Australian Defence Force. Leadership in the Australian Defence Force. 2000
Bilcq, Ron S. Technically Write! Pearson Education, 7th edition, 2007
Page | 24