Journal of Food Protection, Vol. 73, No. 10, 2010, Pages 18911901
Copyright G, International Association for Food Protection
AND
MOKHTAR ZARROUK
Laboratoire Caracterisation et Qualite de lHuile dOlive, Centre de Biotechnologie de Borj-Cedria, B.P.901-2050, Hammam-Lif, Tunisia
MS 10-166: Received 1 April 2010/Accepted 8 June 2010
ABSTRACT
Four Tunisian virgin olive oils (VOOs), derived from varieties (Chemlali Tataouine, Zarrazi Douirat, Fakhari Douirat, and
Dhokar Douirat) grown in the harsh pedoclimatic conditions of the region of Tataouine, were evaluated for their responses to
microwave heating. Aside from fatty acid composition, all other evaluated parameters were affected by microwave heating, and
their variations depend on the genetic factor. Chemlali Tataouine VOO exhibited the slowest biophenol degradation rate and the
least diminution in oxidative stability and consequently, its total fraction and both lipidic and methanolic fractions remained
unchanged with an exceptional antioxidant potential. In the remaining studied VOOs, the biophenol contents, the oxidative
stability, and the antioxidant potential underwent gradual decreases; nevertheless, their levels at the longer treatment time are
close to some fresh VOOs. These results should be taken into consideration when Tataouine VOOs are recommended for
microwave heating.
1892
OUESLATI ET AL.
1893
:
A515nm ~ 10:6DPPH z 0:0167
(r ~ 0:99)
(r 2 ~ 0:99)
1894
OUESLATI ET AL.
1895
TABLE 1. Effect of microwave heating on the fatty acid composition in Tataouine VOOs at different time intervals
Time interval (min):
FAME
10
15
20
30
C16:0 (%)
Chemlali
Tataouine
Fakhari Douirat
Zarrazi Douirat
Dhokar Douirat
12.86
9.79
9.50
18.80
0.10
0.11
0.16
0.24
b Aa
aA
aA
cA
12.84
9.77
9.52
18.82
0.19
0.14
0.11
0.27
bA
aA
aA
cA
12.87
9.78
9.50
18.80
0.16
0.16
0.06
0.20
bA
aA
aA
cA
12.88
9.76
9.51
18.81
0.11
0.12
0.15
0.21
C18:1 (%)
Chemlali
Tataouine
Fakhari Douirat
Zarrazi Douirat
Dhokar Douirat
74.48
75.00
76.02
51.25
1.58
2.37
0.77
0.59
bA
bA
bA
aA
74.46
75.05
76.06
51.27
1.67
1.98
1.30
1.83
bA
bA
bA
aA
74.49
75.07
76.04
51.25
1.17
1.40
1.69
0.98
bA
bA
bA
aA
74.44
75.10
76.01
51.24
1.70
1.48
2.42
0.58
bA
bA
bA
aA
74.50
75.09
76.11
51.26
0.63
1.53
1.11
1.22
bA
bA
bA
aA
74.47
75.06
76.09
51.27
1.20
0.50
1.43
1.31
bA
bA
bA
aA
C18:2 (%)
Chemlali
Tataouine
Fakhari Douirat
Zarrazi Douirat
Dhokar Douirat
4.77
9.89
9.52
23.41
0.02
0.01
0.09
0.16
a A 4.72
c A 9.90
b A 9.51
d A 23.38
0.11
0.09
0.17
0.08
aA
cA
bA
dA
4.73
9.87
9.48
23.37
0.09
0.14
0.06
0.09
aA
cA
bA
dA
4.70
9.84
9.46
23.33
0.05
0.11
0.11
0.23
a A 4.68
c A 9.82
b A 9.45
d A 23.32
0.16
0.09
0.12
0.27
a A 4.66
c A 9.79
b A 9.43
d A 23.30
0.12
0.05
0.17
0.39
aA
cA
bA
dA
MUFA/PUFAb
Chemlali
Tataouine
Fakhari Douirat
Zarrazi Douirat
Dhokar Douirat
14.67
7.16
7.66
2.21
0.07
0.09
0.12
0.03
d A 14.69 0.09 d A
b A 7.18 0.06 b A
c A 7.69 0.06 c A
a A 2.24 0.05 a A
14.68
7.14
7.66
2.20
0.03
0.02
0.14
0.02
dA
bA
cA
aA
14.65
7.15
7.68
2.23
0.04
0.05
0.09
0.06
For each parameter examined, means within a column with same lowercase letters and means within a row with same capital letters are
not significantly different (P , 0.05).
MUFA, monounsaturated fatty acids; PUFA, polyunsaturated fatty acids.
20.985a
20.944a
20.975a
20.604a
20.893a
20.509a
20.884a
20.793a
20.886a
20.972a
20.890a
20.939a
20.529d
20.965a
20.952a
20.970a
20.541d
20.965a
20.960a
20.925a
20.915a
20.971a
20.942a
20.931a
Studied parameters
RSA of TFc
Chemlali Tataouine
Fakhari Douirat
Zarrazi Douirat
Dhokar Douirat
RSA of LF e
Chemlali Tataouine
Fakhari Douirat
Zarrazi Douirat
Dhokar Douirat
RSA of MF f
Chemlali Tataouine
Fakhari Douirat
Zarrazi Douirat
Dhokar Douirat
5,475
5,366
5,396
5,220
92.58
52.87
65.68
85.57
94.87
92.23
92.78
90.39
915
612
681
491
92.76
72.6
83.7
30.4
31.32
14.87
12.98
5.67
dD
bF
cD
aC
19
23
13
25
dA
aE
bD
cC
bA
ab D
ab E
aE
cC
bE
bC
aD
2.34
2.23
1.47
1.17
2.34
2.47
0.49
0.18
5,469
5,349
5,385
5,209
92.24
49.41
62.64
82.55
94.52
92.16
90.26
91.78
909
592
662
367
90.6
68.5
81.1
24.7
dA
a DE
b CD
cC
a
a
a
a
17 c C
28 b E
11 b C
9aD
2.27
1.44
2.12
1.79
2.11
3.59
2.88
1.41
A
b CD
bE
bD
a BC
13 d D
5bD
7cB
6aE
4.4
2.9
1.5
6.6
d Fb 27.12 1.35 c E
cF
9.40 0.66 b E
bE
9.73 0.36 b D
aB
00 00 a A
10 d D
7bE
13 c C
13 a F
4.1
3.4
5.2
5.8
1.13
0.67
0.97
0.21
5,464
5,278
5,255
5,196
92.17
45.27
58.99
80.42
94.69
72.89
70.76
81.87
892
581
654
277
89.9
63.0
81.6
22.8
24.48
7.46
7.98
00
d CD
bD
cD
aB
22
25
20
11
dA
aD
bC
c BC
cA
aC
aD
bD
cC
bD
bB
aD
2.18
1.74
1.48
2.06
1.66
2.01
2.77
2.09
14 d C
5bC
7cB
10 a D
3.4
4.2
3.1
3.9
1.01 c D
1.19 b D
0.12 b C
00 a A
10
5,398
5,131
5,248
4,687
91.08
34.29
45.59
79.25
94.33
63.95
55.12
72.66
851
576
608
226
84.2
54.7
75.4
18.3
21.34
6.32
7.90
00
dC
bC
cC
a AB
dA
aC
bB
c BC
dA
bB
aC
cC
15 d B
11 b C
9cB
14 a C
1.65
1.81
3.28
1.36
3.31
2.69
2.96
2.24
9dB
4bC
10 c A
11 a C
6.8
1.6
3.6
2.8
0.82 d C
1.04 b C
0.23 c C
00 a A
15
5,287
5,082
5,233
3,781
90.33
28.74
41.91
77.24
92.89
51.76
48.32
62.98
838
552
602
190
73.5
48.1
70.4
16.3
16.89
4.34
5.37
00
cB
bB
cB
aA
dA
aB
bB
cB
cA
aA
aB
bB
29 d A
9bB
5cB
9aB
3.20
0.80
1.07
2.91
1.91
1.34
1.47
2.35
20 c AB
3bB
13 c A
6aB
4.6
3.1
2.0
4.0
1.45 c B
0.14 b B
0.40 b B
00 a A
20
5,265
4,978
5,147
3,514
88.67
22.69
35.17
65.92
90.78
50.34
40.76
53.99
823
513
597
141
55.7
36.2
48.9
12.4
8.19
1.45
1.78
00
cA
aA
bA
aA
dA
aA
bA
cA
cA
bA
aA
bA
8dA
14 b A
10 c A
15 a A
1.25
3.64
1.32
0.81
1.77
2.92
2.30
2.04
18 d A
8bA
5cA
8aA
2.6
3.6
6.7
2.1
0.91 c A
0.08 b A
0.09 b A
00 a A
30
,0.001
,0.001
,0.001
,0.001
0.020
,0.001
,0.001
,0.001
0.024
,0.001
,0.001
,0.001
,0.001
,0.001
,0.001
,0.001
,0.001
0.004
,0.001
,0.001
,0.001
,0.001
,0.001
,0.001
P value
OUESLATI ET AL.
Pearson
correlation
TABLE 2. Effect of microwave heating on the induction time, the natural antioxidant contents, and the capacity of the TF, LF, and MF to scavenge the free radical [DPPHN]
1896
J. Food Prot., Vol. 73, No. 10
1897
1898
OUESLATI ET AL.
antioxidants. Furthermore, it has been shown that dtocopherol has the highest efficiency, followed by ctocopherol, which is equivalent to b-tocopherol, and finally,
a-tocopherol as the least efficient antioxidant (45). The LF
of Dhokar Douirat VOO showed no significant variations (P
$ 0.05) in its RSA during the first 5 min of microwave
heating, which was followed by only minor losses observed
at the end of microwave heating, 65.92% (Table 2). A
gradual decrease in the antioxidant capacity of the LFs from
Zarrazi Douirat and Fakhari Douirat VOOs were observed
during the course of microwave heating until they had
succumbed to losses of 35.17 and 22.69%, respectively.
These percentages are similar to those observed for the LF
of fresh Greek VOOs (28, 48).
Because of this evaluation, we concluded that RSA
values of Tataouine VOOs before and during heating were
higher than those values of their respective nonpolar
1899
1900
OUESLATI ET AL.
olive oil business, since the exportation and commercialization of Tunisian oil affect many countries; and (iii) to the
final consumer, who demands safe and healthy oil.
18.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
19.
20.
REFERENCES
1. Abd El-Moneim, M. E., J. Dostalova, J. Pokorny, D. Lukesova, and
M. Dolezal. 2009. Oxidation of olive oils during microwave and
conventional heating for fast food preparation. Czech J. Food Sci. 27:
173177.
2. Albi, T., A. Lanzon, A. Guinda, M. Leon, and M. C. Perez-Camino.
1997. Microwave and conventional heating effects on thermoxidative degradation of edible fats. J. Agric. Food Chem. 45:3795
3798.
3. Albi, T., A. Lanzon, A. Guinda, M. C. Perez-Camino, and M. Leon.
1997. Microwave and conventional heating effects on some physical
and chemical parameters of edible fats. J. Agric. Food Chem. 45:
30003003.
4. Aparicio, R., and G. Luna. 2002. Characterisation of monovarietal
virgin olive oils. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 104:614627.
5. Ben Temime, S., B. Baccouri, W. Taamalli, L. Abaza, D. Daoud, and
M. Zarrouk. 2006. Location effects on oxidative stability of Chetoui
virgin olive oil. J. Food Biochem. 30:659670.
6. Berlitz, H. D., and W. Grosch. 1999. Food chemistry, 2nd ed., p. 333.
Springer, Berlin.
7. Bosetti, C., C. L. Vecchia, R. Talamini, E. Negri, F. Levi, L. D.
Maso, and S. Franceschi. 2002. Food groups and laryngeal cancer
risk: a case-control study from Italy and Switzerland. Int. J. Cancer
100:355360.
8. Brenes, M., A. Garcia, M. C. Dobarganes, J. Velasco, and C.
Romero. 2002. Influence of thermal treatments simulating cooking
processes on the polyphenol content in virgin olive oil. J. Agric. Food
Chem. 50:59625967.
9. Caponio, F., A. Pasqualone, and T. Gomes. 2002. Effects of
conventional and microwave heating on the degradation of olive
oil. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 215:114117.
10. Caponio, F., A. Pasqualone, and T. Gomes. 2003. Changes in fatty
acid composition of vegetables oils in model doughs submitted to
conventional or microwave heating. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 38:
481486.
11. Cerretani, L., A. Bendini, M. T. Rodriguez-Estrada, E. Vittadini, and
E. Chiavaro. 2009. Microwave heating of different commercial
categories of olive oil. Part I. Effect on chemical oxidative stability
indices and phenolic compounds. Food Chem. 115:13811388.
12. Chimi, H., J. Cillard, P. Cillard, and M. Rahmani. 1991. Peroxyl and
hydroxyl radical scavenging activity of some natural phenolic
antioxidants. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 68:307311.
13. Cossignani, L., M. S. Simonetti, A. Neri, and P. Damiani. 1998.
Changes in olive oil composition due to microwave heating. J. Am.
Oil Chem. Soc. 75:931937.
14. El-Abassy, R. M., P. Donfack, and A. Materny. 2010. Assessment of
conventional and microwave heating induced degradation of
carotenoids in olive oil by VIS Raman spectroscopy and classical
methods. Food Res. Int. 43:694700.
15. European Economic Community. 1992. Characteristics of olive and
olive pomance oils and their analytical methods. Regulation EEC/
1429/92 on the modifications to Regulation 2568/91. Off. J. Eur.
Communities L 248:182.
16. European Economic Community. 2003. Characteristics of olive and
olive pomace oils and on their analytical methods. Regulation EEC/
2568/91, Regulation EEC/1989/03. Off. J. Eur. Communities L 295:
5777.
17. Farag, R. S., Z. Y. Daw, E. A. Mahmoud, and S. A. E. Abd ElWahab. 2001. A comparison of c-irradiation and microwave
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
49.
50.
1901