F.
HUMPHREYS,
PC
ATTORNEY
AT
LAW
P.O.
Box
192
Athens,
Georgia
30603
athenslaw@gmail.com
(706)
207
6982
with
the
unfounded
call
to
bar
us
from
the
courts
of
Georgia
for
bringing
claims
for
wrongdoing
that
is
documented
in
the
public
record.
Secondly,
I
call
this
misunderstanding
of
the
procedural
posture
to
your
attention
for
a
more
practical
reason.
The
motion
to
dismiss
notes
that
Defendant
Adams
has
not
been
served
with
the
federal
complaint.
You
will
recall
that
I
previously
asked
you
about
acknowledging
service
for
Adams,
who
has
been
a
defendant
represented
by
the
Attorney
General
in
this
litigation
since
February
of
2013.
To
be
on
the
safe
side,
we
went
ahead
and
served
the
defendants
Judge
Edlein
attempted
to
bar
us
from
adding
and
serving
in
Benedek
I,
though
they
were
served
in
Benedek
II.
As
you
noted,
we
have
had
some
logistical
problems
serving
Michael
Adams,
which
would
be
allayed
by
the
Attorney
General
acknowledging
service
of
the
complaint
on
this
defendant
the
Attorney
General
has
represented
throughout
this
continuous
litigation.
In
our
prior
conversation
you
declined
to
do
that.
Now,
after
receiving
the
Rule
11
letter
and
the
responses
to
the
motions,
with
a
proper
understanding
that
this
is
not
a
separate
lawsuit
being
filed
against
Adams,
but
a
continuation
of
Benedek
I,
in
which
Defendant
Adams
has
already
been
properly
served
and
represented
by
the
Attorney
General
for
more
than
three
years
now,
we
hope
that
you
will
reconsider
your
position,
acknowledge
and
waive
any
objections
to
service,
and
save
us
the
trouble
and
expense
of
tracking
him
down
between
Athens
and
Malibu.
I
will
look
forward
to
your
earliest
reply.
Thank
you
for
your
time
and
attention
to
this
important
matter.