Scholar, Department of Computer Science & Applications, Chaudhary Devi Lal University, Sirsa
Ph.D. Scholar, Haryana School of Business, Guru Jambheshwar University of Science & Technology,
Hisar, India
1
dalbirhsb@gmail.com,2ms_samta89@yahoo.com
I. INTRODUCTION
191
quality of learning.
In concert with
geographical
flexibility,
technologyfacilitated educational programs also remove
many of the temporal constraints that face
learners with special needs (Moore and
Kearsley, 1996). Students are starting to
appreciate the capability to undertake
education anywhere, anytime and anyplace.
The flexibility has heightened the availability
of just-in-time learning and provided
learning opportunities for many more
learners who previously were constrained by
other
commitments
(Young,
2002).
Innovative uses of information and
communication technology can potentially
solve this problem. Internet usage in home
and workplace has grown exponentially
(McGorry, 2002). The demand for education
in developing counties like India has
skyrocketed as education is still regarded as
an important bridge of social, economic and
political mobility (Amutabi and Oketch,
2003). There exists infrastructure, socioeconomic, linguistic and physical barriers in
India for people who wish to access
education (Bhattacharya and Sharma, 2007).
Sampath Kumar and Biradar (2010) observe
the use of information communication
technology (ICT) in 31 college libraries in
Karnataka, India by analyzing the ICT
infrastructure, status of library automation,
barriers to implementation of library
automation and librarians attitude towards
the use of ICT. The survey carried out using
questionnaire, observation and informal
interview with selected college 22 librarians
show that lack of budget, lack of manpower,
lack of skilled staff and lack of training are
the main constraints for not automating
library activities. Even though library
professionals have shown a positive attitude
towards the use of ICT applications and
library automation, majority expressed the
need for appropriate training to make use of
ICT tools.
III. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Sendin
g and
readin
g e-
192
Freque
ntly
Occasio
nally
Seldom
%
ag
e
N %a
ge
%
ag
e
68.
0%
2
1
5
9
23.
6%
1
7
0
8.4
%
Never
N
%
ag
e
0%
Freque
ntly
Occasio
nally
Seldom
N %a
ge
%
ag
e
%
ag
e
Never
N
%
ag
e
mails
Chatti
ng
online
(Faceb
ook,
Instant
Messe
nger)
1
3
7
54.
8%
4
4
17.
6%
3
5
14.
0%
3
4
13.
6%
Readin
g or
watchi
ng the
news
online
1
4
9
59.
6%
3
1
12.
4%
7
0
28.
0%
0%
Using
an
online
diction
ary or
encycl
opedia
9
7
38.
8%
4
3
17.
2%
1
1
0
44.
0%
Search
ing
online
for
practic
al
inform
ation
(e.g.
seats
at a
match,
shoppi
ng,
train
times,
health)
6
3
Search
ing
1
7
25.
2%
69.
2%
8
1
7
7
32.
4%
30.
8%
6
2
24.
8%
0%
4
4
0%
17.
6%
0%
differe
nt
source
s
online
for
inform
ation
and
learnin
g
about
a
particu
lar
topic
youre
interes
ted in
Freque
ntly
Occasio
nally
Seldom
Never
%
ag
e
N %a
ge
%
ag
e
%
ag
e
Learni
ng
with
educat
ional
softwa
re,
games
and
quizze
s
8
5
34.
0%
4
4
17.
6%
9
1
36.
4%
3
0
12.
0%
Taking
part in
online
group
discus
sions
or
forums
1
0
4.0
%
6
6
26.
4%
8
8
35.
2%
8
6
34.
4%
Playin
g one
player
games
online
1
0
4.0
%
2
0
8.0
%
3
4
13.
6%
1
8
6
74.
4%
193
Freque
ntly
Occasio
nally
Seldom
Never
%
ag
e
N %a
ge
%
ag
e
Playin
g
multiplayer
online
games
1
0
4.0
%
1
0
4.0
%
4
2
16.
8%
1
8
8
75.
2%
Brows
ing the
Interne
t for
fun
5
9
23.
6%
3
4
13.
6%
9
8
39.
2%
5
9
23.
6%
%
ag
e
Watch
ing
video
clips,
downl
oading
music,
games,
softwa
re
from
the
Interne
t
9
5
38.
0%
8
6
34.
4%
3
5
14.
0%
3
4
13.
6%
Keepi
ng
your
own
websit
e,
Faceb
ook
page,
blog
1
0
4
41.
6%
5
5
22.
0%
3
6
14.
4%
5
5
22.
0%
194
REFERENCES
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
195